"Lack of common decency": Lawyer calls out Gwyneth Paltrow in ski crash trial | LiveNOW from FOX
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- Gwyneth Paltrow takes the stand as drama in ski crash case unfolds in courtroom. The actress is fighting a lawsuit that alleges she caused serious harm to a skier several years ago.
More LiveNOW from FOX streaming video
Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! www.youtube.co...
Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox...
Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.
Her blink rate is off of the charts.
😂
Those eyelashes are irritating!
I think she is more believable the the idiot suing her! He’s nothing but a money hungry liar as is his daughters too!
What a freakin horrible lawyer. Stupid questions
@Betty Wallace How so?
Her looks to me says "Can you people believe I have to go through this baloney? Doesn't that guy know who I am?
That lawyer is horrible. I think she’s guilty based on the expert testimony- but I mean Gwyneth is overly smug and the lawyer is ridiculous
A JURY TRIAL FOR THAT RIDICULOUS CASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😄😂😆😂😄😂😆😂😄
Wow can this lawyer lady "fan girl" any worse than she already is? It's kind of embarrassing.
She isn't fan girling. She is trying to get on a common ground with Gwyneth. She fails miserably and I hope whatever questions she has Monday she simply asks.
Decency is NOT common.
What does how much she Paid for instructors have to do with anyone ?
Weird questions. Gwyneth clearly was reckless and because she is a celebrity will get away with it.
I hope she wins this case, I think the old man and his daughters are out for money! Period!
Unreal, is she actually smirking?
The lawyer? Yes.
Gwinnie is pompous. 😂
A snippet of America’s ridiculousness
SO she's what? 120lbs? The guy has injuries like he was in a car crash. She's completely uninjured? I'm not buying the guy's story. The physics of it just dont add up.
You don’t understand physics 😂
He may have been moving fast and straight, and she may have inadvertently cut him off, causing the crash by not looking behind her before moving left or right. He may have suffered more injuries bc he was skiing faster.
What? As a nurse for over 30 years I can state that based on his injuries the physics Do add up which is why she walked away without any injuries. All his scans, X-Rays, MRI's etc. all prove he was the victim. If he was the one who crashed into her he would have immediately fallen backwards because she would have been a buffer for him. There would not have been any torso damage much less head trauma. The type of injuries this man received only occur when the human body is slammed against someone or something at great physical force causing trauma to the entire body. Her skis fell apart because when she ran into him she lost total control and lost her balance. She most probably was skiing at a high rate of speed and was either looking up, backwards, or sideways, but not where she should have been looking. JUst like a rear end collission when a person takes their eyes off the road-it only takes a second, but the damage your negligence can cause is tremendous.
Physics do not change just because someone is a celebrity.
At speed you can hit someone hard. Iv been hit by kids that wiped me out.
I would say the more experienced skier is Gwen . I think she would know after all the years of skiing how to avoid someone . But if you have a skier that is less experienced, I would think they would be more accident prone than the more experienced skier. That is how some of the skiing accidents happen. His ribs could have been broken from him tripping over his own skis and landing on the ground . I have to agree with thecloop123. If she hit him she would be hurt to from slamming into him . In my opinion I think he crashed into her .
Lawyer with zero professionalism 😅
Calls out??? What a stupid line, particularly since her info was actually give.
She should have settled.
Do you really think a guy can slam into a woman but she should pay him? Because she's wealthy?
No she should fight it people can’t just sue her because they want to
If that guy is lying it's such a waste of time and money.
@@kated9914 🤣🤡
Yes you’re right.
I am not sure who’s fault this accident was but I think it’s definitely gone too far but Gwyneth just seems so stuck on herself and entitled that I just can’t stand her either
She doesn't seem stuck on herself at all to me. She seems disgusted that this idiot is lying and suing her. He's looking for his next ten vacations to be paid by her. She's losing more money with this lawsuit just sometimes ya just gotta stand up and do what's right
I'm not a Gwyneth fan at all, but her reaction and testimony seems perfectly normal... not stuck up. I think you might be just a little bit jealous because she's rich, famous and attractive. It takes guts to stand up against wrongful allegations when she could very well just write a cheque and make it all go away. She chose the hard thing to do which is to take the stand. That's not stuck up, that's just not being a doormat.
@@lifesabeach8133 agree
Actors are the worst liars
Gwyneth wants to crack up and laugh. She doesn't look injured.
Its a ploy by the Plaintiffs lawyer. . The plaintiffs lawyer is pretending to be Paltrow's buddy. Cracking jokes. Getting her to laugh. Its a ploy to 1)Let Paltrows guard down and 2) Make them more likeable to the jury. Personally, especially after the crack about her not being old enough to have a daughter as old as Paltrow, I would have asked the judge if this is a serious court case or a stand-up comedy show.
Objection, Your Honor. Where is this going?
This entire smash up on the slopes took how long? Ten - 15 seconds and it was over. Both people in shock of one magnitude or another. Confused, dazed, anxious. Wondering what in the world just happened. Trying to sort it all out with lots of other people snapping photos to put on facebook, So - now. The attorneys, news reporters, interviewers - all in their "I'm on TV for the world to see" glory are asking questions as if Ms. Paltrow had 30 minutes to have been able to see and hear everything 3 minutes prior to the smash up, 8 minutes of the smash up, and 3 minutes post smash up. It reminds me of of the investigation disaster the Federal Aviation Agency took against Captain Sullenberger and Co-Pilot Jeffrey Skiles when they landed the severely damaged plane safely on the Hudson River and saved all the lives of passengers and crew. The constant badgering of the FAA reps made it seem like the pilots had hours to make a decision when they only had seconds and those two pilots and the crew saved everyone with very few injuries being reported. So - for me these attorneys asking for every little "second counts" - trying to make it seem as if time had stood still and Paltrow is supposed to have made every mindful decision as if she were in a play or a movie is beyond ridiculous. This was a smash up on a hill - not an evening at Delmonicos.
The same questions will be asked of the plaintiff. This is standard. Don't like it? Don't watch trials that involve personal injury.
@Betty Wallace no they dont, the court does
@Betty Wallace Sanderson plowed into her, she had the right of way, what you wrote was not proven, just like the multiple personalities that ole Terry claimed to have. You lost, get over it.
@Betty Wallace really? Ya wrote an entire “elder abuse” essay regarding how GP should’ve just settled as it would’ve been the best example for her children. I took screenshots of them all, go ahead and gaslight away, after all, that’s what narcs are gonna do, right? Acting too cool now, def was your other personality writing those comments that the judge was in on it with GP’s side 😂 I’d jump ship too, TBH. Way to see your opinions through though.
@Betty Wallace if you singing dancing Queen is confidence, then I’ll pass, Miss Betty 🤦♀️
Skiing is the most fun I have ever had, and it is also terrifying. So I personally would never deliberately engage in risky behavior, but it could be said that skiing, in and of itself, is risky behavior. We're not all great skiers!
Loads of haters commenting here. If I were enjoying a day skiing with my children and someone ran into me from behind I'd be shocked first thing and upset and unhappy sendondly. It's not supposed to happen. Skiers run into trees. As a celebrity she is a target for loose canons.
Gwyneth annoys me more than the lawyer. That's saying something.
This is one of Gwyneth’a best performances!
And her last
The lawyer is fan-girling, and its soo cringe..
Shes loving the attention with that smirk.
Never heard that once
I'd have sid a lot more than the F word...
Unbelieveable to leave the scene and not wait to c if the person was going to be ok.anyone would do that unless u were too precious and arrogant and entitled,!!
She did ask him if he was OK before she left.
She asked her children’s ski instructor to stay with Sanderson. The ski instructor told Gwyneth to join her kids who were waiting for her at the bottom of the hill.
What's going on with her mouth??..😮
Why is she almost bursting into laughter? Very odd concerning she’s on the stand ? Weird . The touching of the hair , the face when asked certain questions…
Because she doesn't care and thinks she has this in the bag.
@@justtryme2020 I hope she does! Sanderson and his daughters are just wanting money! They make me sick!
that attorney is rotten shrewd with little jokes and smiles to think she hides her shrewdness, that would make any witness on stand to be smirking. I am puking.
Intermediate skier means she is a really good skier for those who don't ski. She can do basically any run safely with the exception being some more extreme runs such as steep chutes and narrow double black diamonds. This case is so stupid because it's clear that the guy ran into her from behind. This happens all the time at ski resorts. It's happened to me before. And usually it doesn't even go to trial. I ski with less talented riders all the time and it's easy keep an eye on them and ski under control. If someone runs into your back, it's there fault.
You mean it's "their fault." Apologies, can't help myself from being grammar/spelling police.
You get what you pay for. All those lawyers suck grass man. I still think she is guilty.
If I was GP's publicist, I would have her mess up her hair a little more & relax & just try to not act so elitist & so condescending. Just try to relate to the typical person. But, maybe that's too difficult to even "act". Idk. Maybe she's trying not to appear so haughty, but it seems like she wished she would've just had her insurance deal with it all & called it a day.
i think the audience is puking if you observe their faces.
i support mis paltrow
Who's carrying a pen and paper skiing.???
Phone.
I think 100% Mr. Sanderson, the plaintiff is at fault in this skiing collision. It appears to me Mr. Sanderson is suing Gwenyth Paltrow because she is famous and is a celebrity because she is rich!!!!
Then why not sue for millions? You don’t have the facts. It easily could have been her fault.
As a nurse for over 30 years based Soley on his scans and injuries, and nothing anyone says, there is NO way that he hit her from behind. They all show that someone ran into him.
It is physically impossible to receive those type of injuries unless someone crashed inot you. Physics do not change just because you are a "star."
@@cindi4031 exactly
@@pattyleech5049 He did sue for $3 MILLION-the judge cut it down to $300K. Don't know why because according to the law the judge doesn't have the legal authority to do that based on the type of case this is. Tells me the judge is biased against this man.
He told the truth
It's not up to the parties to decide if everyone is ok. It's up to medical professionals. This lawyer is weak.
I think the guy suing her was using Rudy Guiliani's playbook, as when he was patted on the shoulder by a store clerk and suffered major pain and trauma...it didn't work! Congrats Ms Paltro.
Hot question: who's going to play Gwyneth Paltrow in the Netflix series about this case?
whose going to play this attorney and able to do it with 2000 takes. I wanna see the editing floor
Is there a Rule of Common Decency????
Fantastic!
NO risky behavior, i had condoms on my ski poles.
After this, I don't know that I want to try and learn Ski.
I LOVE HOLLYWOOD STARS ON TRIAL!!😂😂😂
Lousy affect Gwen…..
OMG risky behavior on the slopes. This falls into the Prince Harry syndrome of blue todger.
Gwyneth is acting well
It sounds like that day was a Chinese Downhill and since Goop made it down the hill first, just give her the trophy and go home
She looks like Gary Oldman.
The arrogance 🥴👉
Gwenyth obviously French fried when she should have pizza'd.
What’s the cost of lessons to do with the crash. She is utterly useless Star stuck. She is not guilty simple
Shallow Hal wants a gal
The part of Bandana they were on is not green.
Rb
😮😮😮😮😮😮
Don't laugh with the enemy