UFOs: What Mysteries Could NASA’s New UAP Report Help Solve? | WSJ

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 фев 2025

Комментарии • 780

  • @tacitus539
    @tacitus539 Год назад +372

    That was about the most empty report I could imagine.

  • @bobcortez9471
    @bobcortez9471 Год назад +7

    Meanwhile, Mexico is like “check out these aliens”

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 Год назад +104

    NASA in 1977 sent Steven Spielberg a 20 page letter informing him that releasing "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" could be very dangerous. Mr Spielberg: "I really found my faith when I heard the government was opposed to the film. If NASA took time to write me a 20 page letter, then I knew there must be something happening".

    • @accordionSWE
      @accordionSWE Год назад +1

      Steven Spielberg.. Have not watched anyone of his movies since the movie Super 8 that he produced. What a great film maker. The movies looks so fine and got so many layers of meaning.

    • @bigpaul4450
      @bigpaul4450 Год назад +7

      I think this was more because they were worried it would make a mockery of science than any coverup

    • @shepardsmith3235
      @shepardsmith3235 Год назад

      That was not Spielberg's take. Ill go with him.@@bigpaul4450

    • @anon69_q
      @anon69_q Год назад

      Guys, this settles it. 100% proof that extraterrestrials have visited earth and the US government is covering it up.
      There is clearly no other explanation. Everyday we find more and more evidence of Aliens. I opened my fridge this morning and noticed I was out of milk. That was clearly the work of Martians.

    • @williamwilson6499
      @williamwilson6499 Год назад +8

      Just because Spielberg said he got a letter doesn’t mean he did. Remember, he was selling a movie.
      You probably weren’t born yet, but Jaws put the world into a near panic and sharks were being decimated by fools.
      If NASA did send a letter, it was due to the fear of the inherent stupidity of people who would freak out from the movie.

  • @Khalid.F95
    @Khalid.F95 Год назад +12

    I bet a 4K camera hooked up to these equipment in all US aircrafts wouldn’t cost them $100K

    • @melxb
      @melxb Год назад

      maybe they would have but there are likely technical reasons they can't, maybe at top speeds they fail/aren't fast enough to capture, etc

    • @tacitus539
      @tacitus539 Год назад +3

      I’m pretty sure they find a way to spend $100k on a hammer.

    • @samuelfuentes3327
      @samuelfuentes3327 Год назад +1

      You're right why did no one think of this before... You deserve a nobel prize!

  • @Jamie-gu7ib
    @Jamie-gu7ib Год назад +103

    Imagine having a james webb satelite that can capture photos light years away but can't even capture strange things that enters our planet lol

    • @fredbrandl880
      @fredbrandl880 Год назад +16

      I know hey! But even if they spot something which I’m sure they already have numerous times they won’t show us.

    • @delpinsky
      @delpinsky Год назад

      But you have to direct the James Webb to look the Earth, not the space... but for that we have already a lot of (spy) satellites, launched by private companies and the military.

    • @SofaKingShit
      @SofaKingShit Год назад +15

      It's probably easier to look at someone else's armpit than your own.

    • @realblakrawb
      @realblakrawb Год назад +1

      Because there aren't any going thru the firmament. Theyre from here imo, somewhere we don't know about publicly.

    • @ConsensusX
      @ConsensusX Год назад +5

      @@SofaKingShit No. I can pull out my phone right now, where I'm sitting and look at my armpit. It's called technology.

  • @nathanielsmith5566
    @nathanielsmith5566 Год назад +14

    What gets me is that they say these objects are not of extraterrestrial origin but at the same time indicate they still do not know what these objects are... also, it's been stated by pilots these things don't use any visible propulsion mechanisms which could indicate they there's no heat signature present. Why it would be colder than the ocean is beyond me but then again that's one of many questions we have to seek answers from, right? Also, one must take into account the pilot's perspective who witnessed these things directly and draw conclusions as to what they have claim to have seen.

    • @thehumancanary131
      @thehumancanary131 Год назад

      Tiny bubbles of gas in the windscreen of an aircraft can refract light in such a way as to give rise to erroneous assumptions of UFO activity. Get real!

    • @cyberhawk7274
      @cyberhawk7274 Год назад +1

      It could very well be space bending crafts that create a vaccum like environment around the craft. Basically floating through the space-time fabric. Hence could be cold af.

    • @nathanielsmith5566
      @nathanielsmith5566 Год назад

      @@cyberhawk7274 I wonder if that could be a cause for blurry images?… The only visual evidence of black holes we have at present are all fuzzy images. Sounds convenient I know but I wouldn’t rule it out as a possibility.

    • @thehumancanary131
      @thehumancanary131 Год назад

      Hm...to bend space takes an enormous power...we're talking black hole physics here...@@cyberhawk7274

    • @kyussbrooker1774
      @kyussbrooker1774 Год назад

      If thay are made by humans then they pose more of a threat the if they were extra torrential. Being that either is likely, then we can say it's most probable that both are correct.

  • @AP_0001
    @AP_0001 Год назад +2

    Thanks for the coverage.

  • @MrTee-de7to
    @MrTee-de7to Год назад +13

    Whether it's a UFO or not, the Chinese balloon debacle shows we need to be more observant and seriously investigate anything we are not sure about.

  • @badchuckle
    @badchuckle Год назад +31

    0:20 not using a propulsion system and thus cannot be a spaceship...
    They forgot to include the possibility of anti-gravity technology and technology that enables energy sources to not cause heat. Kinda bad reporting in my opinion on that part.

    • @paulsaulpaul
      @paulsaulpaul Год назад +1

      Any "free energy" device would produce cold given the nature of Dirac sea hole current (and similar concepts). Floyd Sweet's VTA device, when the output was "shorted" out on itself (drawing maximum current), it froze the coils and they iced over as the water vapor in the atmosphere froze on them. This same cooling is present in all of these "over-unity" devices. It makes sense if you consider it as a form of "negative entropy".
      There is misinformation all over this nonsense with their disclosure. Other than them not being extraterrestrial. They've been here in mortal flesh since they betrayed the Father. Corrupting and enslaving humans for thousands of years (written about in the Book of Enoch and the Old Testament). The floods didn't wipe them out completely. By now, they've got a whole network of bases underground, below the ice caps, on the moon, other moons in the solar system, and probably Mars (I don't know; seems right given the Andrew Basiago sideshow).
      I have a lot more to write on this subject, but I wanted to point this out to you about Floyd Sweet's device if you were not aware of it. I don't check for responses, so I won't know if anyone responds with questions. Tom Bearden's website is no longer available, but Jean-Louis Naudin still seems to have his site up. I recall these off the top of my head since I did all my free energy and anti-gravity research decades ago. I regret not saving all the info on the assumption that it would always be there. I found one good video on Bearden's MEG on youtube with 157 views... So the information is dying off.
      edit: I don't study this stuff anymore, and now study meta-physics and theology. With full submission to the Father and his son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. I also don't endorse the use of free energy or anti-gravity, as I consider it to be overstepping bounds and a betrayal of the Father (kind of a like a modern tower of babel, humans have not earned the right to leave this star system because we are very unrighteous in our intentions).

    • @samuelfuentes3327
      @samuelfuentes3327 Год назад +2

      @@paulsaulpaul Lay off the crack

    • @siffchopf22
      @siffchopf22 10 месяцев назад

      pop science buzzword bingo here we go

  • @LogicRebellion
    @LogicRebellion Год назад +79

    What is NASA's assessment of the 2004 tic tac incident? Has NASA requested and received classified data to assist in their assessments?

    • @danielwooten4509
      @danielwooten4509 Год назад +4

      They said their analysis, etc. would all be unclassified for transparency

    • @cosmo3024
      @cosmo3024 Год назад +9

      They said they are using only unclassified data that is already on the public domain .

    • @vickijo2343
      @vickijo2343 Год назад +4

      I think narrator said it was anomalous because it had no propulsion evident.... standard answer to swerve alien technology explanation....

    • @n1troni
      @n1troni Год назад +2

      Didnt nasa recently go out in public and say they confirm that ufo's exist but they believe they have no extraterrestrial origin. And they also said that they dont know whats causing those ufos

    • @analienfromouterspace
      @analienfromouterspace Год назад

      All your questions are a yes but you wont get a direct answers.

  • @supervike1
    @supervike1 Год назад +219

    This is what UFO people have been asking for. For decades. Scientists taking the topic seriously, and trying to figure it out.

    • @MrProzacmilkshake
      @MrProzacmilkshake Год назад +9

      just all drones

    • @Nemenis
      @Nemenis Год назад

      @@MrProzacmilkshake i wish. the fastest drone isnt even 1000mph. not even 1/10th the speed of the ufos that government is reporting.

    • @Real-cq1wj
      @Real-cq1wj Год назад +6

      I agree. I want the answers without having a agenda, if there is something out there I want to know if it looks convincing and the truth is there is a boring explanation I also want to know that. I just want the truth wherever that leads, I'm all ears. Just FKN get on with it please fr fr lol😅

    • @richardallan2767
      @richardallan2767 Год назад

      Seti has been investigating this for decades. Just out there. Let's face it, those mexican mummies look incredibly fake. As the video says, the most interesting stuff, the navy footage, is incredibly ambiguous.

    • @evamevs4169
      @evamevs4169 Год назад +5

      UAPs are just secret military aircraft in development 🤣 we are the aliens

  • @JasperH5150
    @JasperH5150 Год назад

    Thank you for not playing dramatic loud music in your videos... We can actually understand your dialogue !

  • @andyhughes1776
    @andyhughes1776 Год назад +28

    I lost all respect for NASA.
    The latest NASA report said the same thing every government agency now say:
    "We have no evidence these things came from outer space."
    "We now have a task force studying it."
    "We don't know what these things are."
    "We need more data" (even though NASA already has data from over 60 years of space exploration).
    In other words, we know nothing, we see nothing!

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 Год назад +4

      This is why i have a lot of respect for nasa they tell what they know and what they don't it's not like they are the CIA.

    • @nathandean5869
      @nathandean5869 Год назад +3

      what do you want them to say?

    • @andyhughes1776
      @andyhughes1776 Год назад +2

      @@paxundpeace9970 The see-ai-ay told NASA what to say!

    • @andyhughes1776
      @andyhughes1776 Год назад

      @@nathandean5869 In other words, I want NASA to come clean!

    • @steveburke7675
      @steveburke7675 Год назад +3

      @@andyhughes1776 Nah.....you wan't NASA to agree with you.

  • @Frankyouknow
    @Frankyouknow Год назад +5

    When a pilot says, "I seen a UAP, you got my attention."🙏

    • @smilergrogan1725
      @smilergrogan1725 Год назад +1

      One of our pilots said "I seen a UFO"? The first step should be to get him back in English class to learn how to use proper grammar... yikes.

  • @poliltinktink5343
    @poliltinktink5343 Год назад +75

    Given all the advanced technology regarding the space program, Hubble and the JW telescopes, along with the most advanced fighter planes in the world, and you expect us to believe, that these grainy 1950's photos/videos are the best pictures they're able to get??? C'MON MAN !!! 🤨

    • @KevinCox-v2o
      @KevinCox-v2o Год назад

      You think this is all the government has...the best pictures and clear videos the government keeps classified..and when everyday citizens post clear pictures, people say it's fake or ai generated

    • @badbad-cat
      @badbad-cat Год назад +3

      🤨 Don't ask questions. Just believe whatever they ask you to believe

    • @melxb
      @melxb Год назад +3

      that's why u shouldn't believe these are alien spaceships, they would have been captured on those devices already

    • @Thunderbyrd.
      @Thunderbyrd. Год назад +2

      @@melxbThey have also been captured on HD video. and photos. Just do a search.

    • @melxb
      @melxb Год назад

      @@Thunderbyrd. if they did we would have already announced that we found life outside of our own, so those are probably fake, explainable or again still not clear enough to say one way or another since they could pass for/be explained away as objects from earth

  • @BLURTHEGHOST
    @BLURTHEGHOST Год назад +28

    Am loving every minute of Disclosure😎

    • @williamwilson6499
      @williamwilson6499 Год назад

      Yeah, the disclosure is there’s nothing there other than ordinary aircraft and balloons.

    • @danielgarcia8815
      @danielgarcia8815 Год назад +4

      what disclosure hahaha

    • @americanaboy3581
      @americanaboy3581 Год назад +2

      ​@@danielgarcia8815are you living on mars ?

  • @wisdomSP
    @wisdomSP Год назад +5

    Why is it difficult to get better footage? I have a 4K camera in my pocket, but every time the military releases UAP footage it looks like it's from 1970.

    • @samuelfuentes3327
      @samuelfuentes3327 Год назад +5

      How about you take your 4k camera and record someone from like 5 miles away. Post it and let's see how well it turns out!

    • @fatronjones
      @fatronjones Год назад +2

      Government loves to release grainy footage. They probably have way better images. They won't release to the public.

    • @RoyGNH
      @RoyGNH Год назад +1

      Exactly! My small commercial drone has 4k and provides better footage then what the government has released from several multi-million aircraft! C’mon’ guys - 😂 you can’t make this stuff up!

  • @David_Lloyd-Jones
    @David_Lloyd-Jones Год назад +26

    "I don't know what this is."
    Therefore I am an expert on visitation from allien civilizations...

    • @paxundpeace9970
      @paxundpeace9970 Год назад +2

      Despite running software and complex calculations and research on it we don't know what it is.

    • @ThePowerLover
      @ThePowerLover Год назад

      @@paxundpeace9970 This.

  • @SquirrelNuts-r1u
    @SquirrelNuts-r1u Год назад +25

    NASA can't comprehend the idea that there may be technology that is further advanced then earth's. Bill Nelson also admitted that he had not made himself familiar with the UAP hearing but isn't that his job?

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 Год назад +1

      Oh they comprehend it very well. But they have to appear as if they don’t.

  • @Subaru2_1
    @Subaru2_1 Год назад +5

    it reminds me of a civilian report of seeing two big aliens in their backyard to a police 3 months ago

  • @ropro9817
    @ropro9817 Год назад +3

    It certainly doesn't help that the media overhypes all this 😒

    • @stephanlandshuter5237
      @stephanlandshuter5237 Год назад +2

      "Overhypes"? All mainstream media are silent as graves about this topic. And thank God they are, I can do without the giggles, X-Files music and talking about "little green men".

    • @Raussl
      @Raussl Год назад

      @@stephanlandshuter5237 nonsense...they overhype it. Even the ones definitely solved are shown as "unidentified" like the one at the start of this video...if you don't know, that is what a bird looks like in infra-red. Flies with about 40mph, at 4 miles height...let me introduce you to "the goose".
      I'm sorry you can't cope with the fact that they are all nothing burgers.

    • @fatronjones
      @fatronjones Год назад +1

      The media is more focused on Hunter Biden, Ukraine and Trump. I never hear about UFO reports.

  • @deficator750
    @deficator750 Год назад +14

    now we have iphones and samsungs with the best cameras yet we still have no photos. But everyday we have the best footage of people freaking out in public.

    • @DITTOE
      @DITTOE Год назад +14

      go shoot something outside a few football fields away and tell how me how it looks...

    • @Fellolkek
      @Fellolkek Год назад +12

      point your phone at a plane flying above your head. see how good the quality of your photo is. sky is really big. and knowing where to point cameras is extremely hard when these objects are flying much faster than military jets, let alone commercial planes.

    • @UncleBuZ
      @UncleBuZ Год назад +3

      Looks fine when you know what you're doing.@@DITTOE

    • @UncleBuZ
      @UncleBuZ Год назад +5

      These "objects" aren't being reported at 30 thousand feet. You and DITTOE go to the same logic and reasoning class??@@Fellolkek

    • @specialkdivine
      @specialkdivine Год назад +1

      The issue is we need to develope better cameras . An AI camera that can track things are present cameras can't. Considering we can take pictures Billions of light-years away. This shouldn't be a problem. Develop the tools we need to get the answers we want instead of wasting time and money on archaic tech. Chemical propulsion is not the future😔

  • @JCO2002
    @JCO2002 Год назад

    Mick West explained "Go Fast" quite some time ago, and had it bang on.

  • @kalasatwater2224
    @kalasatwater2224 Год назад +3

    I hope there's a big reveal soon

  • @thenoodler
    @thenoodler Год назад +4

    I’m no astrophysicist, but I’d say it’s most likely a tie-fighter.

  • @importantname
    @importantname Год назад +3

    And if we keep missing and identifying large "weather" ballons - what else do we not see?

  • @kwyacf8631
    @kwyacf8631 Год назад +1

    I remember a bright red and green colour round in shape orb like flew past over my house.. My sister saw that as well.. we were so young we thought it was a ghost or something.. and now we still talk about it everytime we read news like this

  • @Firestorm637
    @Firestorm637 Год назад +3

    My son is a pilot. They see strange things all the time. More smartphones catching more images.

  • @ivane182_23
    @ivane182_23 Год назад

    the quality argument is flawed, when the military kept the high resolution video and gave a downgraded version to the public, why did they give the high resolution video not even to the congress?

  • @SkinPeeleR
    @SkinPeeleR Год назад +2

    Hmmm, if they can't find their own plane, i'm in doubt..

  • @laurenhosford1478
    @laurenhosford1478 Год назад

    THat video at start is zoomed in with higher fov. Its not flying fast at all. 10 points though for solid tracking skills

  • @JosedeJezeus
    @JosedeJezeus Год назад +19

    We are being watched by human beings who live in space on ships as explorers. One day, we will join them.

    • @amigoloco2484
      @amigoloco2484 Год назад +2

      How do you know?

    • @gelatohotbox5157
      @gelatohotbox5157 Год назад +4

      Beam me up, Scotty

    • @JosedeJezeus
      @JosedeJezeus Год назад

      @@amigoloco2484 I know, because of how it makes me feel. My explanation for the UFO phenomenon is simple, and beautiful. There is NO better answer to the question.
      I developed this theory after many years of interest in the UFO phenomenon. Do you know the man Travis Walton? His story was how I figured it out (he was accidentally electrocuted by a Flying Saucer that he encountered in the forest, and he went missing for 5 days. He woke up on a ship, and saw .... human beings. Look it up.)
      *If we are being watched by humans, then WHAT are these* -> 👽!!??
      These -> 👽 are *Artificial Intelligence* “Robots.” And there are many different types of “robots,” that’s why people report seeing different “types” of “Aliens.” We will build the SAME machines.
      We are NOT alone! Humans are the logical conclusion to evolution, the Creation that can understand the Creator.
      Don’t believe the people who say we are destined for extinction. They are WRONG. We are DESTINED for the STARS. We will join our brothers and sisters in space. They believe in us, they have faith in us, and they are waiting for the day we join them.

    • @alainpannetier2543
      @alainpannetier2543 Год назад +5

      @@amigoloco2484 He's right! I can tell you! I'm one of them. I'm typing this comment from one of these very spaceships! Actually, no, we don't type. We just think and comments get submitted, instantly. Jesus is sitting next to me, on my left, and Saint Peter's on the other side (upside down, as he usually does - but hey, there's no up and down where we are). We'll come and get you for a quick tour. Get ready: wear a clean pajamas.

    • @thiswayoutbigbang4162
      @thiswayoutbigbang4162 Год назад +1

      It's just sounds weird you would even say something like that. Are you just joking?

  • @loki76
    @loki76 Год назад +1

    0:15 4.2 miles above the water? That is ~22,000 feet. So the pilot is at 30,000 feet? And 40mph is slow.

    • @Thunderbyrd.
      @Thunderbyrd. Год назад +2

      I suppose the WSJ knows more than the FA-18 pilots, personnel, sensors, radar, flir, targeting pods, etc

  • @farmcat3198
    @farmcat3198 Год назад

    @0:46 - It's a cricket, vibrating on the inside of the wing between the cowling and the sensor.

  • @specialkdivine
    @specialkdivine Год назад +7

    Everything on this planet can be explained thanks to our level of comprehension. These things exist. This is not new. We have been telling them these things for quite some time now. Regardless of what people believe it's only logical to study these phenomenons. So if they know these not UAPs then they must have the answer. Looking at videos and listening to testimonials it's quite easy to see the importance of learning about these objects. Someone has solved how to move more efficiently through our atmosphere then we can and that alone would propell our society forward. There not Ghosts, there not angels , they are not mammals ... come on folks what could these things be. Considering someone has the ability to control our nuclear arsenal. That should be a Major concern🤔

    • @Chris-ex5ed
      @Chris-ex5ed Год назад +2

      They are our gardner's and we are the plants

  • @ZebraActual
    @ZebraActual Год назад +1

    What the report revealed is that the unofficial acronym Never A Straight Answer still holds true...

  • @STRICTLYOFFROAD
    @STRICTLYOFFROAD Год назад

    The first few seconds I thought we found a real tie fighter

  • @tshepomofokeng8558
    @tshepomofokeng8558 Год назад +16

    As a person who love gazing at the stars here in Africa I always see these moving ubove the clouds, sometimes 6 at once, and as an engineer I could easily conclude based on the movement pattern that they weren't airplanes, jets or man spaceships,... course all these would crash instantly they are just not build for such movements or manoeuvre

    • @MdVaDc
      @MdVaDc Год назад +3

      Man I bet you can see all the stars. In America it's too much light pollution. We can't see the stars anymore and it sucks. When I was a kid I remember looking up and seeing millions of stars it was amazing. Now at night you might see 10 or 15 stars if your lucky.

    • @filipmihajlovic7779
      @filipmihajlovic7779 Год назад +5

      You probably saw Elon Musk's starlink satellites

    • @AmericanAkosm
      @AmericanAkosm Год назад +1

      Likely Starlink

  • @shirleypettit9600
    @shirleypettit9600 Год назад

    Mr Graves is a hero, twice.

  • @mercenary754
    @mercenary754 Год назад +2

    NASA- "never a straight answer"

  • @bht96
    @bht96 Год назад +1

    This is a big story. But, it’s weird that it’s not bigger. You would think that now that it’s proven that it would be the biggest story in human history.

  • @BuckRolly1
    @BuckRolly1 Год назад

    0:24 "So it's probably not a spaceship" - if data is so limited, why the blanket statement? Surely the correct thing to say is 'We don't know enough to guess what it is'...

  • @WilliamHauberg-el8em
    @WilliamHauberg-el8em Год назад +3

    What a fascinating time to be alive! There will be so many revelations as secrets come to the daylight and as science is catching up with these! Cannot wait for what's to come!

    • @cyberhawk7274
      @cyberhawk7274 Год назад +1

      Also cannot wait to see all the hypocrites fall on their faces for their ridicule over the decades.

    • @blueabattoir
      @blueabattoir Год назад

      Nothing is going to happen. Grow up.

  • @Jr.AlsandroDeimion-mf5jy
    @Jr.AlsandroDeimion-mf5jy Год назад +1

    Radial

  • @888jackflash
    @888jackflash Год назад

    Hey WSJ Editor- the correct words are "aircraft" not "aircrafts", and "radar" not "radars".

  • @skynet681
    @skynet681 Год назад

    Nasa can't identify these objects with their multi million dollar equipments, yet some youtubers have concluded that the navy videos are just birds

  • @werners5191
    @werners5191 Год назад +7

    You can’t tell me that what this video shows is representative of what the government knows.

  • @nowayshay
    @nowayshay Год назад +11

    Hmmmmm government is trying so hard to convince me there are aliens.

    • @Uapinvestigations
      @Uapinvestigations Год назад

      Lol

    • @rickring1396
      @rickring1396 Год назад

      Read the footnote at 2:26
      Under the Title: “Coming soon”
      -->National security withheld.
      Slower than the JFK data release!

  • @JT-kr2ds
    @JT-kr2ds 2 месяца назад

    So we have Google Earth that can zoom all the way in to someone’s yard but we can’t get a clear video of UFO. What a crock.

  • @SorminaESar
    @SorminaESar Год назад +3

    Good morning every one arround the world

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 Год назад

    When people bash civilian UFO footage for being bad and then you get MILITARY GRADE EQUIPMENT showing UFOs and its still considered bad.

  • @comment8767
    @comment8767 Год назад

    How many thousand times will we have to see this video replayed?

    • @an-cx1ho
      @an-cx1ho Год назад

      probably until more evidence is wrestled away from the jealous clutches of the government... notice how the vids that we know were not willingly published by the government, how they constantly talk about how the resolved cases will be made public ... but nothing is being made public, and it is the unresolved cases that are interesting anyway ... the government tries to go into damage control mode, pretend to do something about it while actively working to discourage people from taking interest in this issue

  • @Charlie-gf4mv
    @Charlie-gf4mv Год назад

    birds: exist
    americans: OMFG ALIENS!!!?!??!?

  • @theonidas
    @theonidas Год назад

    dont be fooled by this old age debate about the "quality" of footage not being sufficient to prove this craft are more than capable of breaking our known laws of physics. military aircraft and ground installations have monitored and recorded these craft in high detail but this footage is either scrubbed so heavy the resolution fails to properly showcase the craft or operators decides not to turn in the footage out of fear of retaliation.

  • @fitpro6801
    @fitpro6801 Год назад +1

    Chill guys that was just a seagull hunting on its prey 🤣

  • @DianeWainwright-b7g
    @DianeWainwright-b7g Год назад

    E115 is used in a "UAP UFO" device to assist and enable an inert climate within a given vacuum sealed device.

  • @19moods
    @19moods Год назад

    Its difficult to get higher quality footage, when they dumb down the quality. ;) As stated per the fighter pilots and government officials.

  • @yepyep2921
    @yepyep2921 Год назад +1

    Good report.

  • @A1FAHx
    @A1FAHx Год назад +10

    Alien life is everywhere in the universe - they’re just not here.

    • @Eyrrll
      @Eyrrll Год назад +1

      From a statistical standpoint, some should be here… or, at the very least, they were here in the past.

    • @flakedao
      @flakedao Год назад +2

      Fear is the mind killer. As in if you are afraid, you will not be able to think rationally. They are here, they have always have been.

    • @969omo
      @969omo Год назад

      You mean there is intelligent life in the universe - just not here.

    • @samuelfuentes3327
      @samuelfuentes3327 Год назад

      @@Eyrrll Tell us how you came up with this statistical probability

  • @hundun5604
    @hundun5604 Год назад

    They can photograph your doorbell with a satellite, but they can't find a UFO on all those satellite images?

  • @roro-mm7cc
    @roro-mm7cc Год назад +1

    0:20 In other words, it’s flying at the speed of a bird, it’s the size of a bird and at the altitude of a bird. Literally a goose or something. The amount of over sensationalism is incredible.

  • @Sage16226
    @Sage16226 Год назад

    We went from no photos/videos to graining photos/videos.

  • @chetisanhart3457
    @chetisanhart3457 Год назад

    Turns out CGI doesn't create a wake in water.
    Can I have my award now ?

  • @ChosenOne6666
    @ChosenOne6666 Год назад +1

    You have skeletons in your closet, I have aliens in my basement. -Chris Brown

  • @otterpossum9128
    @otterpossum9128 Год назад

    If it's brighter than the ocean, it is warmer, not colder. The downside of having someone with a nice voice rather than knowing what they are talking about.

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Год назад

    it reveals words you will have to search in every page in dictionary or type in your search engine. there is nothing else to know from it

  • @Blazedbarbie333
    @Blazedbarbie333 Год назад +3

    It’s crazy how most of these crafts look exactly like the Vimana (spelled wrong 😂) … these craft have been visiting for thousands of years. It’s in every culture every religion ect

  • @reubenkhj4296
    @reubenkhj4296 Год назад +5

    That's a TIE fighter ! The death star is real!

  • @mrgamnwatch
    @mrgamnwatch Год назад

    I'm actually thoroughly disappointed that they didn't mention the discussions in Congress about access to information the government has on UAPs.
    I guess the fact we're talking about UFO/UAPs is a good thing in general. But there's nothing ground breaking here.

  • @beachsidebum
    @beachsidebum Год назад

    looks like a star wars tie fighter to me

  • @terranaut3314
    @terranaut3314 Год назад

    I guess Grusch doesn't make the cut anymore

  • @dewnademand3097
    @dewnademand3097 Год назад

    Love USA from Sitamarhi Bihar India

  • @winningjubbly9712
    @winningjubbly9712 5 месяцев назад

    The "Go Fast" object was claimed by the US government to be a....carrier bag blowing across the water by the wind...This not only insults the intelligence of the public, but also (and more importantly) questions the ability of US combat fighter pilots to confuse litter blowing in the breeze with anomalous UAP exotic technology.
    This also applies to the pilots who report close encounters with these objects that fly past them mere feet from the cockpit. I've heard people dismiss the tic-tacs as plasma projections and aerogel drones that can perform the blistering transmedium capabilities reported in the media.
    No matter how exotic or incredible these encounters become there will always be those who desperately want to dismiss them as nothing but litter or other nonsense.

  • @springbloom5940
    @springbloom5940 Год назад

    I wonder how much money NASA spent on a report that says we need more information.

  • @Earth_Being
    @Earth_Being Год назад

    Title: 💯
    Outcome of this video: 👁️👄👁️

  • @gouravmisra2317
    @gouravmisra2317 Год назад

    Namaste ma'am good evening 🌆 watching from India 🎉🎉

  • @williamwilson6499
    @williamwilson6499 Год назад +1

    0:20 Balloon. The impression of speed is an illusion due to apparent motion. Remember, the jet is traveling at a high speed and the sensor is zoomed in.
    Obviously not extraordinary technology as the sensor easily locked on.
    1:44 The out of focus aircraft didn’t move off at high speed. The sensor lost lock and the sensor was zoomed in at 2x setting. Again, apparent motion. Look at the magnification data on the display.
    The Middle East ball…balloon.
    Gimbal? The IR plume of another jet. The rotation was due to the sensor rotating its camera to keep the object within its operating range.
    2:00 Already explained by DoD. A drone was trying to track another drone and a commercial airliner was disrupting the sensor. The back and forth movement was solely caused by the sensor attempting to find the drone. Again, apparent motion.

  • @VicInvades
    @VicInvades Год назад

    They want to opens source UAP data collection.

  • @SorminaESar
    @SorminaESar Год назад +2

    The narator seem Julie Chang's voice, I guess so🙏

  • @markortaliz4929
    @markortaliz4929 Год назад

    first one looks like a TIE fighter

  • @inLegacy
    @inLegacy Год назад +2

    organizations around the world have so much money and talent to develop new technologies that are becoming out of control from governments that cannot guarantee their own airspace sovereignty, kinda concerning

  • @azharshaikh4174
    @azharshaikh4174 Год назад +2

    Government is adamant to prove it all a 'Cake' like those videos 'is it a cake?' 😂

  • @101yayo
    @101yayo Год назад +1

    "What are THOSE!!!"

  • @teddysurf
    @teddysurf Год назад +1

    Ryan graves… Sees a party balloon in the sky and it’s aliens…

  • @jimysk8er
    @jimysk8er Год назад

    Just a reminder that neither the term UFO or UAP has any relation to extra terrestrials. Not to say they couldn't. I would also argue that neither term would apply if we did determine them as extraterrestrial seeing as that would begin to identify them. I am on board with the person who stated that extraterrestrial should be the last resort assumption.

  • @claudiacabrera5125
    @claudiacabrera5125 Год назад +1

    NASA is completely aware of this. And far more information.

  • @smartups1
    @smartups1 Год назад +1

    I was saw the same thing about 18 years ago when I in child hood .same shiny surface round body fly in the air .

  • @jamesgreenler8225
    @jamesgreenler8225 Год назад

    The best publicaly collected footage you will see is from the 2012 earthquake tsunami in Japan. The pair of small craft match the Aguadilla UAP craft flight characteristics. Nobody can explain how they fly from air to liquid. A force field ? They make SpaceX obsolete by millenia. Was originally aired on CNN

  • @josenino7140
    @josenino7140 Год назад +1

    Simple...Nasa needs to give access to raw pictures on the dark side of the moon and Mars.

  • @jamesgreenler8225
    @jamesgreenler8225 Год назад

    NASA doesn't have force field tecnology. UAP craft do . This can be seen in the 2012 Japan earthquake tsunami footage

  • @junknoodles1028
    @junknoodles1028 Год назад

    Lack of data isn’t the problem. Classification of that data is.

  • @HarryJPotter
    @HarryJPotter Год назад +6

    nasa makes new project to find life (their main goal) after 70 years... forgets to even make up a person to run it until 3 hours after asked.

  • @frozengamer3030
    @frozengamer3030 Год назад

    I don’t think aliens pilot the craft. It’s most probably top secret human technology we don’t know about

  • @dadmadforgot4050
    @dadmadforgot4050 Год назад +2

    It’s great different outlets are reporting on this issue and we need more of it, the problem is the way it’s reported is so clearly coming from a standpoint of general ignorance on the topic.

  • @shinji2224
    @shinji2224 Год назад

    How are you going to say it’s not a spaceship if you don’t know what it’s capable of

  • @tensenpark
    @tensenpark Год назад

    "It's colder than the water, so it has no propulsion system, so it's probably not a spaceship". Some major assumptions right there. Just that we only use combustion-based propulsion systems right now doesn't mean than that something else is not possible

  • @MrWuwho
    @MrWuwho Год назад

    I m a junior scientist with materials and aeronautical engineering background. I can tell you that we dont discuss about it at all, mostly out of fear of the perceptions our colleagues around us. Perhaps some renounced tenured tracked professors from IVE league universities may dare to comment on it once or twice but that's it.
    The government need to not just acknowledge but support the research of things we cannot explain in the sky. Perhaps e.g. some National Science Foundation funding for UAP study so we can buy some equipment for systematic study. There also need to be some professional scientific journals about this so there can be peer review process in place to check the integrity of research. This is more reliable and effective than a bunch of scientists working secretly in the government with only narrow perspectives of a few people and limited data from some non scientific reports.

  • @liquid_butter
    @liquid_butter Год назад

    Why do cell phones have better quality cameras than a 30 million dollar jet? For another 200 dollars they can upgrade.

  • @Firestorm637
    @Firestorm637 Год назад

    Rather than not believing and trying to rule out. How about believing then trying to rule out

  • @rachmadsuhartono
    @rachmadsuhartono Год назад

    Is it "anomalous" or "aerial"?