This lecture is really good unfortunately the quality if the audio is poor. Please remake and repost this material with better quality of audio and microphone in the future
The Arabic term "Ijma" is discussed in this video. Ijma means consensus, usually referring to Ijma al-Sahaba (consensus of the companions), but it could also refer to Ijma al-Ulema (although this category is problematic from a Fiqhi perspective).
But why there is so much disagreement between early muslims even sahabas(ibn Abbas for ex)on the women covering?it was not clear how the women wear?The women did not follow the quran instructions?The prophet did not tell them how?Is confusing.
There are some narations, more than three, about it. However, like any other hadith narations, debat about their soundness are inevitable, except if the narations are mutawatir.
It’s a famous narration and it’s believed shahih. The point was not about why umar beat the slave, the point is, the purpose of hijab in the past was to distinguish which one was a free woman and which one was a slave or a low class woman, it means not all Muslim women obligated to wear hijab, only a free high status woman during Umar regime.
This lecture is really good unfortunately the quality if the audio is poor. Please remake and repost this material with better quality of audio and microphone in the future
👏👏👍
The Arabic term "Ijma" is discussed in this video. Ijma means consensus, usually referring to Ijma al-Sahaba (consensus of the companions), but it could also refer to Ijma al-Ulema (although this category is problematic from a Fiqhi perspective).
I know it's been a while since this, but I have a question.
15:23 even some scholars said the thigh is not awrah
But why there is so much disagreement between early muslims even sahabas(ibn Abbas for ex)on the women covering?it was not clear how the women wear?The women did not follow the quran instructions?The prophet did not tell them how?Is confusing.
If the prophet sallallahu alaihi wasallam didn't said about this then there shoud be not any compolsion
Are these Hadith authentic of umar r.a hitting a women for covering her hair and being aggressive
@@kanizfatima1377 y not
I believe not..its wrong
@@ahshanjanishadhon3115 actually it's a sahi hadees. It's a famous hadith.
There are some narations, more than three, about it. However, like any other hadith narations, debat about their soundness are inevitable, except if the narations are mutawatir.
It’s a famous narration and it’s believed shahih. The point was not about why umar beat the slave, the point is, the purpose of hijab in the past was to distinguish which one was a free woman and which one was a slave or a low class woman, it means not all Muslim women obligated to wear hijab, only a free high status woman during Umar regime.