@@paulboyne8786 Your clueless lad he is world class look at Ronaldo and Messi, Modric all were top class up to 36. Salah is the ultimate professional no reason why won't do the same.
People rubbishing FSG must have forgotten how they saved us from going into liquidation. Since they took over we have won every trophy in football apart from the Europa League. They’ve invested in a new training facility, expanded the ground and brought us right back to the top table of world football. They brought us Klopp and now seem to have made a seamless transition by appointing the right successor in Slot. They will make the right decision regarding these players. We shouldn’t give Salah what he wants. We should give him what we think he’s worth over the length of a new contract. Not because FSG are k*ntz but because that how you conduct business.
They are multi billionaires now thanks to the club, it was always going to sell hence the fact it literally sold and is now worth £4billion-£5billion compared to the £300mil it took to buy the club at the time. They didn't ride in on a white horse out of love for scousers they bought the club knowing the resale value with the way tv rights and sponsors where going. Every move they make is with money in mind and they take 0 risks, even when building on the stadium they use in house loans so the interest benefits them financially. They get far too much credit for bringing Jurgen in, he came because of the stature of the club not because of the owners you absolute moron. Using that logic Torres came because of Hicks and Gillett and Gerrard signed a long term deal in 09 because of them too. Salah is one of the greatest PLAYERS ever for this FOOTBALL CLUB and should be rewarded as such rather than being treated as an ASSET in BUSINESS. Do I think they are bad owners? No, there's much worse out there and the club is a healthy one financially no doubt. Do I think they put money before success? Yes, definitely. Would I ever suck them off to the point of saying we shouldn't keep hold of one our greatest ever players and just turn a blind eye to absolutely everything they have done wrong? Nope, that's what long distance fans that don't go to games do because they they think it makes them look like a real fan 😂 I've never seen brown nosing like it here, you are defo from Essex or something and was nowhere to be seen when we had to walk out of that ground over ticket prices.
Honestly a great strategy should have been to honour the players that have showed them unwavering loyalty and simultaneously they should have secured Kvara in preparation for when Salah eventually does leave or retire.. Providing Kvara enough time to settle in the country club and style of play. Just my opinion! :)
Liverpool should give Salah a contract. But not at the money he is already receiving. Same pay, with bonuses that pay him money by appearance and goals. I think that's how we should deal with this. 2 year contract. We also need to sign Trent and VVD, that's a lot of money for probably 3 of the biggest players in the PL.
FSG is not the issue here. Under klopps final years the whole upper structure broke down as he was in charge of practically everything. If Hughes and Edwards were in charge it never would have got here. They are now in a position of timing and what order they solve this issue in because clearly they can play off each other's contract to make additional demands. Klopp and his very short term German director he hand pinched are largely responsible for this. I love klopp, always will but we have too admit his weaknesses.
‘Liverpool can’t do what other football teams do.’ Why can’t they exactly? One of the highest revenues in world football with lowest spend on players, what reason other than the owners don’t support the club is there?
Utd give rashford 350k per week..but we can't afford to give to that the best player in the league? We are not paupers but fsg have made everyone think we are.
Liverpool have a ready made structure. Salah is top of that. If he wants to stay, then we should give him a contract. But in no way should we break the bank.
Saved us? John W Henry didn’t even know who Liverpool Football Club were, he even said so himself, and that he was talked into buying the club. We all know that the only reason why he brought the club was to make a profit as we were available on the cheap. Myself and everyone else at that time wanted DIC, we didn’t want anymore Yanks after Hicks and Gillett. Don’t get me wrong they have done some good things for the club like redeveloping the 2 stands, the AxA, and appointing Klopp. However, when it comes to investing in the squad they just can’t afford to do it year on year, as their transfer strategy just doesn’t work anymore. In 2019 after winning the CL we only brought in Adrian, Elliott and VDB, and during the last few years we wanted Bellingham who we had been scouting for about 2-3 seasons, and Tchouameni, and we didn’t sign either of them as we wouldn’t pay the transfer fees or break our wage structure to sign them. Caicedo we were never going to pay 110m for and if anyone thinks otherwise then they are deluded, as they only made that bid just to show the supporters that they were willing to spend. They never had any intention of signing him as they knew he only wanted Chelsea. Nobody is asking for FSG to spend like Chelsea and Utd, we just want them to spend more than the bare minimum for the positions that are needed, which they didn’t do again this summer, as we needed a DM and CB and we failed to sign either of those positions. The lack of signings is also why we haven’t been good enough in the league since winning it in 2020, as we have had a lot of injuries during that time and had they brought in the positions we needed to make us stronger we would have won another league title. I really don’t get how we could go into previous seasons with 3 injury prone CB’s, injury prone midfielders and an injury prone striker. I still think had we brought in Diaz in the 2021 summer window injury of the January window we would have won the league instead of losing it by a point. I also think had we brought in a midfielder that season we would have won the quadruple, but the club just doesn’t learn and would rather keep what they have rather than bringing in a player or two to make the squad stronger.
what do you talk about, young players developing. The midfield Alexis , Szobo, gravenberch all new from last year , already looking better. - They will be able to win the prem within 2 years
Alexis 25, Szobo 23, Grav 22. We need to be able to replace VVD and Salah soon too. They are in their 30s. They should take lesser money now, stay as key players with bonuses according to performance.
Why can’t Liverpool afford to renew all? Look at the revenues Liverpool generate. It is a CHOICE not to commit the wages expenditure not through lack of funds being there
I think the point is that FSG just will not change their spending policy so Liverpool have to work within that sturcture until such time as the Club gets sold to a more freely spending owner. FSG are probably working on the fact that we are unlikely to unseat City over the next 2 years so increasing spending is not justifiable in their eyes
I think you might want to realise that FSG make zero decisions on matters that concern football. 😂 We have a CEO of football and a Director of Football handling those expects. Chill
@@SkywalkerXxX my point was about having the financial capacity and resource to renew. We have that and ultimately it comes from the top how much we can spend. There’s a clear trend in how FSG run each of their sporting franchises
@@MCW1111 Let our CEO and Director of Football decide yea. That's what they have been hired to do. We have the financial capacity to do many things, doesn't mean we spend money for the sake of spending it like Chelsea and Man U
Lmao, You considered that nobody actually wanted to buy him? Liverpool paid 37.5m to buy Salah. Klopp turned him into the best right winger in the world.
I've said this elsewhere It would have been unbelievably ballsy, as a new manager who's only two or three games in, to ask for loyalty from any player. Slot appears to be a humble man who wants to make sure everything is moving in the right direction, and that a player is also happy with HIM, before any talk about renewals goes ahead. That's most likely where we are with all three of these players.
I like Slot's reply to contract questions. If we lose Salah VVD Trent on free transfers next year so be it. The management at LFC will take accountability. Football is a business. There will be a compelling reason.
FSG have no ambition. They didnt back Klopp and wont back Arne Slot. Salah, VvD and TAA are legacy players and deserve contracts showing their worth. They will be the difference between silverware and not. Its sensible to view each case on its merits especially for players over 30. No noticeable decline in Salah's numbers. He actually looks better than ever ans his all round game has improved. VvD is back to the best version of himself after the ACL. Trent will improve defensively under Slot and still get the assist numbers. Without these 3 players we are much weaker as a team. That's a fact.
No ambition? They've extended the stadium, revitalized the academy both structurally and by packing it with talent. Commercially they've put this club in a way better condition than when they found it. How did they not back Klopp? They've spent big when they find the right player and been sensible in the transfer market. Unfortunately they are at the club during a time where hitting the 90+ point mark doesn't win titles because of the buzzsaw that is man city. There aren't many clubs that can afford the types of fees and wages city is able to sustain and that's just the reality of the premier league as it currently stands. You say give the contracts and that's so easy for you when you don't know what the players are asking for. I've seen rumors of Trent wanting an absolutely massive contract, he's a right back that is probably going to end up being the highest paid player at the club. They'll pay it because he's a scouser and letting his go would cause riots outside the stadium, but once they do where do they get the money to pay VVD and Salah? The amount the club is able to spend on wages isn't a bottomless pit. I'd like to see them keep all three of these players but if Salah or VVD want a big payday in Saudi there's no way to match it. We'd have to shell out 800k/ week to match a 400k/ week Saudi contract. The only hope is that they have enough affinity with Liverpool and belief in Arne Slot that they will take a 2-3 year contract to stay at a top club in Europe rather than a big payday elsewhere. It's so easy to spend someone else's money isn't it? I'd rake these owners rather than be owned by some morally dubious state backed investment funds like Newcastle or City, and there aren't too many ultra rich alternatives to what we currently have out there, owners wise. Or are you planning to throw down your 1.5 billion pounds and save us from the "terrible" owners who have brought Liverpool back to the level supporters only dreamed of before they arrived?
@@chrisnull3658 they would announce new commercial deals before they would sign us a few players, We bring in around 60mill of sales this summer and spend it on a goalkeeper we dont see for a year and a winger we dont need who struggled to get a starting place in the juve team and was bought using a sell on fee we got from solanke going from bournemouth to spurs that is a serious lack of ambition, they may ha e ambitions for commercial deal but not on the playing side they dont
Do get me wrong salah is good but how Ashton can sit there and say there is no sign of salah slowing down he clearly never watches him because his pace is going and you can clearly see that
Salah is our most clinical and creative player and even if you think his pace is going ( which is debatable) he's still one of the players we have for counter attacking.
@@hamzakashif9395 I’m a season ticket holder pal for many years and it’s not just me that thinks that many that go to the games think that. You an arm chair supporter by any chance!!!!
FSG are skinning this club to the bone. Brilliant players such as the 3 whose contracts run out next Summer have been helping this club to overachieve. Get rid of the parasites that are FSG, John W Henry and other stakeholders. We could very easily become another Man U if not.
Liverpool, given where they were as a club before Klopp came in; are very fortunate to have those players on their team. To have waited until this time and still talking about contracts running out; it’s insane. Those are some of the greats in the current football landscape. Why can’t you give them new deals.
With all the technological medical advances, check what is Mo's biological age is.....he may be legally 32, but biologically he appears as good as a 25........ Do that check and then decide
Salah and van Dijk will re-sign for 2-3 years and then they can both go to Saudi Arabia for the big pension payout. The saudis will still be all over both of them!!
I am 100% with Hugh on this , it is unlikely that We will win the league or champions League in the next 2 years so extending Salah on anywhere near his current Salary directly causes us not to be able to strengthen in the medium term. I also feel the same about continuing to expect Nunez will come good with no evidence to support that pipe dream.
The reason it is unlikely for us to win the league or the UCL is the lack of funds by the owners. How is it that for the last 3 years we have gone in the market for DM's but failed to get any?? ( Tchoumeni, Caicedo, Lavia, Zubimendi ) ( and don't say Endo if he was the best option we wouldn't have been in the market for Caicedo, Lavia and Zubimendi) And after another failed transfer window we hear PR quotes like "Liverpool don't need a DM" If you really think Liverpool are broke just ask yourself the question where did the Caicedo money go?? Where did all the money from selling players go?? And the Answer is straight into FSG's pockets We are the 4th richest club in the club world but because of FSG our ambitions are in the gutter.
Salah is 32 and has been at liverpool for 7yrs.. you would think he is a new signing with this arguement. Keep him but not something like 350k for 4yrs.
350k a year is worth 18.5 mil, For 3 years it's 55.5 mil. Now do you want to keep a player who is integral to the club or do you want to buy someone unproven like Darwin costing the club 100mill. Knowing Salah's supreme dedication to keep himself fit, only a fool would let him go. Not to mention his yearly shirt sales are always number 1 unless there is a new top signing.
Hugh is a rubbish at his job..chats rubbish everytime i listen to him..aint a true football man..i think this a just a wage for him to pay his mortgage..i would do a better job for half his pay...without salah liverpoo Would have won nothing in the period he has been at the club..imagine if he was european and not egyptian this wouldnt b a debate with the numbers he puts up season after season..we had him at city instead of grealish we would win the champions league every season..
Without Salah I don't think we struggle. Every time he goes away to the African cup of nations people always say Liverpool will struggle but we actually don't. We're not a one man team anymore.
All due respect to liverpool who are a really great side but 1 title in 30 years akin with liescster and Blackburn means nothing.. Klopp was a great character no doubt, I'm a city supporter and I loved the guy, I thought he was was a great icon of the prem but Liverpool arent the super side theyd like to think. There's a massive gulf between the 2 clubs. I'll sell him. Get the cash and rebuild. AS looks a good manager.. Think of the future when pep leaves. Salah will drop off at some point...
Salah is being over hyped. A third of his goals are pens. The rest are scuffs, tap ins and placed. Salah can't actually shoot the ball. That's concening for a forward. We should have sold him for 150m last year
So this guy is saying that Liverpool can’t do what other clubs can do. Brother, you are wrong. Liverpool can do all that. But Liverpool and the owners simply don’t want to. Because they are a bunch of tight arses. That’s all they are. Stingy bloody tight arses.
Salah has 4 years left in him at the top level he is world class and looks after himself
Now we are being told he has 4 years left in him. Give it a rest.
Don’t be silly lad ffs over the last 12 months his pace is going and you can see that
Just a few weeks back people called him finished. Let Liverpool handle it
@@paulboyne8786 Your clueless lad he is world class look at Ronaldo and Messi, Modric all were top class up to 36. Salah is the ultimate professional no reason why won't do the same.
@@SkywalkerXxXI wasn't one of those people
People rubbishing FSG must have forgotten how they saved us from going into liquidation. Since they took over we have won every trophy in football apart from the Europa League. They’ve invested in a new training facility, expanded the ground and brought us right back to the top table of world football. They brought us Klopp and now seem to have made a seamless transition by appointing the right successor in Slot. They will make the right decision regarding these players. We shouldn’t give Salah what he wants. We should give him what we think he’s worth over the length of a new contract. Not because FSG are k*ntz but because that how you conduct business.
They are multi billionaires now thanks to the club, it was always going to sell hence the fact it literally sold and is now worth £4billion-£5billion compared to the £300mil it took to buy the club at the time. They didn't ride in on a white horse out of love for scousers they bought the club knowing the resale value with the way tv rights and sponsors where going. Every move they make is with money in mind and they take 0 risks, even when building on the stadium they use in house loans so the interest benefits them financially. They get far too much credit for bringing Jurgen in, he came because of the stature of the club not because of the owners you absolute moron. Using that logic Torres came because of Hicks and Gillett and Gerrard signed a long term deal in 09 because of them too. Salah is one of the greatest PLAYERS ever for this FOOTBALL CLUB and should be rewarded as such rather than being treated as an ASSET in BUSINESS.
Do I think they are bad owners? No, there's much worse out there and the club is a healthy one financially no doubt. Do I think they put money before success? Yes, definitely. Would I ever suck them off to the point of saying we shouldn't keep hold of one our greatest ever players and just turn a blind eye to absolutely everything they have done wrong? Nope, that's what long distance fans that don't go to games do because they they think it makes them look like a real fan 😂 I've never seen brown nosing like it here, you are defo from Essex or something and was nowhere to be seen when we had to walk out of that ground over ticket prices.
Can Liverpool replace Mohammad Salah?… well… let’s find out… 2 years… 4 years from now… why do we need to know it now? Lol
Honestly a great strategy should have been to honour the players that have showed them unwavering loyalty and simultaneously they should have secured Kvara in preparation for when Salah eventually does leave or retire.. Providing Kvara enough time to settle in the country club and style of play. Just my opinion! :)
Liverpool should give Salah a contract. But not at the money he is already receiving. Same pay, with bonuses that pay him money by appearance and goals. I think that's how we should deal with this. 2 year contract. We also need to sign Trent and VVD, that's a lot of money for probably 3 of the biggest players in the PL.
FSG is not the issue here. Under klopps final years the whole upper structure broke down as he was in charge of practically everything. If Hughes and Edwards were in charge it never would have got here. They are now in a position of timing and what order they solve this issue in because clearly they can play off each other's contract to make additional demands. Klopp and his very short term German director he hand pinched are largely responsible for this. I love klopp, always will but we have too admit his weaknesses.
‘Liverpool can’t do what other football teams do.’ Why can’t they exactly? One of the highest revenues in world football with lowest spend on players, what reason other than the owners don’t support the club is there?
Cause the owners don't have any say in player purchases or contract renewals 😅.
Utd give rashford 350k per week..but we can't afford to give to that the best player in the league? We are not paupers but fsg have made everyone think we are.
Liverpool have a ready made structure. Salah is top of that. If he wants to stay, then we should give him a contract. But in no way should we break the bank.
Everyone talking about his wages but no one talking about LFC HUGE revenue for having him on the team sheet!
Liverpool revenue? Have you even considered the bonuses related to performance that is paid out to Salah?
Saved us? John W Henry didn’t even know who Liverpool Football Club were, he even said so himself, and that he was talked into buying the club. We all know that the only reason why he brought the club was to make a profit as we were available on the cheap. Myself and everyone else at that time wanted DIC, we didn’t want anymore Yanks after Hicks and Gillett. Don’t get me wrong they have done some good things for the club like redeveloping the 2 stands, the AxA, and appointing Klopp. However, when it comes to investing in the squad they just can’t afford to do it year on year, as their transfer strategy just doesn’t work anymore. In 2019 after winning the CL we only brought in Adrian, Elliott and VDB, and during the last few years we wanted Bellingham who we had been scouting for about 2-3 seasons, and Tchouameni, and we didn’t sign either of them as we wouldn’t pay the transfer fees or break our wage structure to sign them. Caicedo we were never going to pay 110m for and if anyone thinks otherwise then they are deluded, as they only made that bid just to show the supporters that they were willing to spend. They never had any intention of signing him as they knew he only wanted Chelsea. Nobody is asking for FSG to spend like Chelsea and Utd, we just want them to spend more than the bare minimum for the positions that are needed, which they didn’t do again this summer, as we needed a DM and CB and we failed to sign either of those positions. The lack of signings is also why we haven’t been good enough in the league since winning it in 2020, as we have had a lot of injuries during that time and had they brought in the positions we needed to make us stronger we would have won another league title. I really don’t get how we could go into previous seasons with 3 injury prone CB’s, injury prone midfielders and an injury prone striker. I still think had we brought in Diaz in the 2021 summer window injury of the January window we would have won the league instead of losing it by a point. I also think had we brought in a midfielder that season we would have won the quadruple, but the club just doesn’t learn and would rather keep what they have rather than bringing in a player or two to make the squad stronger.
Liverpool triyed to buy salah 12m from swiss club but chelsea payed 14m only reasen he didnt come to liverpool 2013
what do you talk about, young players developing. The midfield Alexis , Szobo, gravenberch all new from last year , already looking better. - They will be able to win the prem within 2 years
Alexis 25, Szobo 23, Grav 22. We need to be able to replace VVD and Salah soon too. They are in their 30s. They should take lesser money now, stay as key players with bonuses according to performance.
salah has to stay
Why can’t Liverpool afford to renew all? Look at the revenues Liverpool generate. It is a CHOICE not to commit the wages expenditure not through lack of funds being there
Plus they no longer have Thiago, Mane, Fabinho, Henderson, Matip, Firmino on the wage bill anymore. All were on big money
I think the point is that FSG just will not change their spending policy so Liverpool have to work within that sturcture until such time as the Club gets sold to a more freely spending owner. FSG are probably working on the fact that we are unlikely to unseat City over the next 2 years so increasing spending is not justifiable in their eyes
I think you might want to realise that FSG make zero decisions on matters that concern football. 😂 We have a CEO of football and a Director of Football handling those expects. Chill
@@SkywalkerXxX my point was about having the financial capacity and resource to renew. We have that and ultimately it comes from the top how much we can spend. There’s a clear trend in how FSG run each of their sporting franchises
@@MCW1111 Let our CEO and Director of Football decide yea. That's what they have been hired to do. We have the financial capacity to do many things, doesn't mean we spend money for the sake of spending it like Chelsea and Man U
He could have made DOUBLE his wages if he was playing at City, PSG, United, RM, etc.
Lmao, You considered that nobody actually wanted to buy him? Liverpool paid 37.5m to buy Salah. Klopp turned him into the best right winger in the world.
3 year contract & after 2 years if he aint still performing then we sell.
Does anyone remember when football shows and football supporters used to talk about football instead of finance?
Pay the man end of
I've said this elsewhere
It would have been unbelievably ballsy, as a new manager who's only two or three games in, to ask for loyalty from any player. Slot appears to be a humble man who wants to make sure everything is moving in the right direction, and that a player is also happy with HIM, before any talk about renewals goes ahead. That's most likely where we are with all three of these players.
lol the first caller tho 👀🤣
This bloke is clueless
I like Slot's reply to contract questions.
If we lose Salah VVD Trent on free transfers next year so be it.
The management at LFC will take accountability.
Football is a business.
There will be a compelling reason.
They nead 2 get this contract dun and giv mo wat he once if not get fsg out the football club
That’s why Klopp ran out of steam because the spent more in terms of energy and passion then on dollar.
FSG have no ambition. They didnt back Klopp and wont back Arne Slot. Salah, VvD and TAA are legacy players and deserve contracts showing their worth. They will be the difference between silverware and not.
Its sensible to view each case on its merits especially for players over 30. No noticeable decline in Salah's numbers. He actually looks better than ever ans his all round game has improved. VvD is back to the best version of himself after the ACL. Trent will improve defensively under Slot and still get the assist numbers. Without these 3 players we are much weaker as a team. That's a fact.
Yet you cant give everyone 350k a week like salah earns and that the problem the club have
Yawn. We've got a great squad, great manager and great stadium, Enjoy the ride and stop moaning about FSG.
No ambition? They've extended the stadium, revitalized the academy both structurally and by packing it with talent. Commercially they've put this club in a way better condition than when they found it. How did they not back Klopp? They've spent big when they find the right player and been sensible in the transfer market. Unfortunately they are at the club during a time where hitting the 90+ point mark doesn't win titles because of the buzzsaw that is man city. There aren't many clubs that can afford the types of fees and wages city is able to sustain and that's just the reality of the premier league as it currently stands. You say give the contracts and that's so easy for you when you don't know what the players are asking for. I've seen rumors of Trent wanting an absolutely massive contract, he's a right back that is probably going to end up being the highest paid player at the club. They'll pay it because he's a scouser and letting his go would cause riots outside the stadium, but once they do where do they get the money to pay VVD and Salah? The amount the club is able to spend on wages isn't a bottomless pit. I'd like to see them keep all three of these players but if Salah or VVD want a big payday in Saudi there's no way to match it. We'd have to shell out 800k/ week to match a 400k/ week Saudi contract. The only hope is that they have enough affinity with Liverpool and belief in Arne Slot that they will take a 2-3 year contract to stay at a top club in Europe rather than a big payday elsewhere. It's so easy to spend someone else's money isn't it? I'd rake these owners rather than be owned by some morally dubious state backed investment funds like Newcastle or City, and there aren't too many ultra rich alternatives to what we currently have out there, owners wise. Or are you planning to throw down your 1.5 billion pounds and save us from the "terrible" owners who have brought Liverpool back to the level supporters only dreamed of before they arrived?
@@chrisnull3658 they would announce new commercial deals before they would sign us a few players,
We bring in around 60mill of sales this summer and spend it on a goalkeeper we dont see for a year and a winger we dont need who struggled to get a starting place in the juve team and was bought using a sell on fee we got from solanke going from bournemouth to spurs that is a serious lack of ambition, they may ha e ambitions for commercial deal but not on the playing side they dont
@@SW-by9ob we dont know he is a great manager yet he has had 3 games ffs
Of course Hugh Who'sACoft thinks Salah should be released.
Liverpool would go back in mid table the moment he leaves!
Do get me wrong salah is good but how Ashton can sit there and say there is no sign of salah slowing down he clearly never watches him because his pace is going and you can clearly see that
Salah is our most clinical and creative player and even if you think his pace is going ( which is debatable) he's still one of the players we have for counter attacking.
@@hamzakashif9395 I’m a season ticket holder pal for many years and it’s not just me that thinks that many that go to the games think that. You an arm chair supporter by any chance!!!!
FSG are skinning this club to the bone. Brilliant players such as the 3 whose contracts run out next Summer have been helping this club to overachieve. Get rid of the parasites that are FSG, John W Henry and other stakeholders. We could very easily become another Man U if not.
Then why has he only won them 2 league cups the last 4 years?😂😂😂
Real madrid still have modric... Liverpool should keep salah and vvd also what 24 year old is better than vvd and salah? No one.
Losing VVD is the bigger risk for LFC.
Liverpool can do what idiots do, but we aren't doing it.
Not that it matters but I always loved Ashton but I've lost respect for him in this show
Liverpool, given where they were as a club before Klopp came in; are very fortunate to have those players on their team. To have waited until this time and still talking about contracts running out; it’s insane.
Those are some of the greats in the current football landscape. Why can’t you give them new deals.
With all the technological medical advances, check what is Mo's biological age is.....he may be legally 32, but biologically he appears as good as a 25........
Do that check and then decide
🤣🤣🤣🤣Bull💩
Stop getting jealous, you man utd fans 😂
Salah and van Dijk will re-sign for 2-3 years and then they can both go to Saudi Arabia for the big pension payout. The saudis will still be all over both of them!!
I am 100% with Hugh on this , it is unlikely that We will win the league or champions League in the next 2 years so extending Salah on anywhere near his current Salary directly causes us not to be able to strengthen in the medium term. I also feel the same about continuing to expect Nunez will come good with no evidence to support that pipe dream.
I wouldn't say that always back Liverpool in Europe
The reason it is unlikely for us to win the league or the UCL is the lack of funds by the owners. How is it that for the last 3 years we have gone in the market for DM's but failed to get any?? ( Tchoumeni, Caicedo, Lavia, Zubimendi ) ( and don't say Endo if he was the best option we wouldn't have been in the market for Caicedo, Lavia and Zubimendi)
And after another failed transfer window we hear PR quotes like "Liverpool don't need a DM"
If you really think Liverpool are broke just ask yourself the question where did the Caicedo money go??
Where did all the money from selling players go??
And the Answer is straight into FSG's pockets
We are the 4th richest club in the club world but because of FSG our ambitions are in the gutter.
Plastic scouse ringing in
Salah is 32 and has been at liverpool for 7yrs.. you would think he is a new signing with this arguement. Keep him but not something like 350k for 4yrs.
350k a year is worth 18.5 mil, For 3 years it's 55.5 mil. Now do you want to keep a player who is integral to the club or do you want to buy someone unproven like Darwin costing the club 100mill. Knowing Salah's supreme dedication to keep himself fit, only a fool would let him go. Not to mention his yearly shirt sales are always number 1 unless there is a new top signing.
Is it your money?
Chiesa is his replacement
Salah really isn’t as good as people convey
🤡
Lay off the crack pipe lad
Hugh is a rubbish at his job..chats rubbish everytime i listen to him..aint a true football man..i think this a just a wage for him to pay his mortgage..i would do a better job for half his pay...without salah liverpoo
Would have won nothing in the period he has been at the club..imagine if he was european and not egyptian this wouldnt b a debate with the numbers he puts up season after season..we had him at city instead of grealish we would win the champions league every season..
If Salah can compromise into the LFC pay structure then he has a future, otherwise he will not get a reneweal
Without Salah I don't think we struggle. Every time he goes away to the African cup of nations people always say Liverpool will struggle but we actually don't. We're not a one man team anymore.
7 years at Liverpool but only won 1 PL and 1 UCL 😮💨
Say it without crying
How many English clubs never won PL or UCL? Fak of.
what have you won and at what club
Apart rooney, the top ten list all time scorers who won both.
Shearer, kane, aguero, henry. These are elite strikers
Only Manchester City can match that over the pass 7yrs😂😂😂you fool 1prem and 1champions league
All due respect to liverpool who are a really great side but 1 title in 30 years akin with liescster and Blackburn means nothing.. Klopp was a great character no doubt, I'm a city supporter and I loved the guy, I thought he was was a great icon of the prem but Liverpool arent the super side theyd like to think. There's a massive gulf between the 2 clubs. I'll sell him. Get the cash and rebuild. AS looks a good manager.. Think of the future when pep leaves. Salah will drop off at some point...
@ianmacleod3079 You should have just deleted your post when you got to the supporting City bit 🤣 🤣 🤣
Salah is being over hyped. A third of his goals are pens. The rest are scuffs, tap ins and placed. Salah can't actually shoot the ball. That's concening for a forward. We should have sold him for 150m last year
Nonsense 🤣
Yeah… salah accidentally wrote himself into numerous record books. And he’ll accidentally do it again and again.
What a JOKE of a comment
Who's we? You're definitely not a Liverpool FC supporter. Fak of.
Jealous united fan pretending to support liverpool.
So this guy is saying that Liverpool can’t do what other clubs can do. Brother, you are wrong. Liverpool can do all that. But Liverpool and the owners simply don’t want to. Because they are a bunch of tight arses. That’s all they are. Stingy bloody tight arses.