NOBODY TOLD ME THIS!! The Inconvenient Truth About the Republican Party
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 июн 2024
- ROAD TO 120,000 SUBS
CURRENT SUBS- 117,261
tiktok & instagram
michaelwduffy
What should I react to next !?!?
#republican #democrat #politics #democrat #republicans #reaction #trump #donaldtrump
NO COPYRIGHT INTENDED FAIR USE PURPOSES ONLY 
Развлечения
public middle school history and civics classes showed me this 😅
should've shown you a better video
Michael can you do me favor can you put your mayo in your refrigerator lmao😂❤❤❤❤❤
It kinda became his mascot a couple of years ago, he even got rid of it awhile back but he brought it back.
It's probably his "support" mayo.
Check out Malcolm X talking about the democratic party.
Thomas Sowell Welfare system..
southern democrats... not democrats. You people got a gap in your history
@@theteob689 A democrat is still a democrat .. There is no difference.
Go read the history of how the Democrat Party was born.
Truth
more like partial truth... you're missing the whole part that saw these people migrate to the republican party
I love the "this is not going to be one-sided" feel that the beginning promised... Only to end up with a "yeah, this is definitely going to be one-sided".
The one side being the truth. Would you prefer a video of lies to make it more two sided? The dem party is a garbage truck pushing garbage policies and filled with voters who are uninformed and largely unintelligent. Pure garbe.
ADRENOCHROME... If you know, you know...
a lot of democratic politicians and celebrities love that stuff.
Michael, do me a favor and put the mayonnaise away..it's been on your couch 🛋 back forever!!!!
What mayonnaise ? 👀
@@michaelwduffyReally, it appears that you have a large jar of Best Food's mayonnaise over your right shoulder in your videos 📹!
Hay what's with the mao??
nice to see another set of eyes opened by the truth
that was a republican explaining only partial truth
@@donaldthomas1963 no kidding, she is a republican, but it is not a "partial" truth, truth is truth, history is history, and the democratic party has been against almost every minority there is, and I, by the way am an independant and always have been
Partial. Derp.
Good on you for thinking for yourself. Love your vids
Iam 67years old and did not know this !!!!!
57 and knew this from public school since 12 yrs old
because its not the whole story this was a sponsored Republican video, look up the political party switch that occurred
@donaldthomas1963 this was not sponsored by the Republican party .. nor was there any ever switch your claiming .. past that this diversionary tactic of yours is also known as a logical bias .. brush up on your critical thinking skills and you will realise this yourself
Lol at the switch. Debunked over and over again. The dems were racist then and they are racist now. What's worse is they have become pushers of normalizing pedos.
@@brianburgess3231 wait you're denying the dixiecrats existed and the southern strategy by nixon never happened? and you didn't see the Republican party filibustering and voting against the Fair Housing Act in the mid 60s? or the Trump (Donald & Fred) being indicted for illegally continuing redlining well throught 80s...
Sure... logical bias :D 🤣
Now you might want to check out "The Inconvenient Truth About the Democratic Party".
You need to watch the video called the Inconvenient Truth about Democrat Party.
The fact almost everyone misses is that in the 19th century prior to the Civil War. the platforms of both political parties were REVERSED. The conservatives we know today were actually the Democrats of the 19th century, and it was the Republican party that had the ultra liberal, corporate welfare, elite class. It was only after the Civil War that the Democrat and Republican parties adopted the platforms they have today. Back then, it was the Democrats that were patriotic and conservative and the Republicans were the socialist liberals that pushed the Civil War into happening.
Wow, You keep telling yourself that is it makes you feel better.
@@djlp2212 This is the truth. Clearly, you must have gone to public school because they skip a LOT of important lessons like the history and evolution of the political parties. I wonder why!
Don't get hung up on political party titles. What you need to keep in mind is that back in the 19th century, it was the liberals and progressives that pushed for the Civil War that would bring about a big, monolithic federal government that was not part of the original structure of the United States. They did this under the title of "Republicans" which is how they were known then. It was NOT conservatives and advocates of small government and state sovereignty who pushed for Americans to slaughter Americans in that disastrous war. If Abraham Lincoln were alive today, he would be a Democrat, not a Republican as he was then, because his political platform is entirely of the Democrats today. Titles don't matter; political platforms do, and it was the progressive, liberal platform politicians that pushed for and got their ruinous Civil War that ushered in the beginning of a massive and far-reaching federal government. It was only after the 20th century that the political party titles switched and became as we know them today, i.e. Republicans / conservative and small government vs. Democrats / liberal and big government.
@@djlp2212 This is the truth. Clearly, you must have gone to public school because they skip a LOT of important lessons like the history and evolution of the political parties. I wonder why!
Don't get hung up on political party titles. What you need to keep in mind is that back in the 19th century, it was the liberals and progressives that pushed for the Civil War that would bring about a big, monolithic federal government that was not part of the original structure of the United States. They did this under the title of "Republicans" which is how they were known then. It was NOT conservatives and advocates of small government and state sovereignty who pushed for Americans to slaughter Americans in that disastrous war. If Abraham Lincoln were alive today, he would be a Democrat, not a Republican as he was then, because his political platform is entirely of the Democrats today. Titles don't matter; political platforms do, and it was the progressive, liberal platform politicians that pushed for and got their ruinous Civil War that ushered in the beginning of a massive and far-reaching federal government. It was only after the 20th century that the political party titles switched and became as we know them today, i.e. Republicans / conservative and small government vs. Democrats / liberal and big government.
Why? Because you don't do your own research.
so let me get this straight........ Demon-rats Lie?
The dems & republicans changed places!
BS
@@JukeboxHero-og5uq ruclips.net/video/OvcYjG0Sq1I/видео.html
yup ruclips.net/video/s8VOM8ET1WU/видео.htmlsi=vzxj07KG4qgcCzuT the rest of the story
Where in the world would you get such a stupid idea?
@@cathygowen5484 That's the narrative the lefty lemmings have been brain washed with to counter the truth. I've seen other left-loons say the same thing.
You're missing a whole piece of history there... First off she keeps calling them democrats during the civil war, those are southern democrats, that's the name of the actual party. you missed the whole part about the southern democrats, aka dixiecrat. you know those that existed in Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina... and really just there. These are the people who opposed the end of slavery... you missed the whole part of Richard Nixon and the southern strategy...
are you really in the middle trying to get the truth? because it doesn't seem that way... just read about dixiecrats and try to understand the difference between Southern Democrats and the actual "Democratic party" of today.
Also because I don't understand how can you say when hearing about black people "Because we're all people" but when people talk about trans... apparently those aren't people to your party. how comes? since you're saying the republicans have been the ones for inclusion... so why aren't they? 🤔
@@Doug_M?
Lincoln would never be a republican in 2024
Why
He would be against democrats' human trafficking slavery just like their old form of slavery.
@@Harm2u Don't expect logic from a democrat.
not Maga to be sure
@@brianburgess3231 Trump is pretty much another Lincoln.