TUSK is an urban kit for any Abrams tank, it can be mounted on any Abrams, it is not a variant, its a kit. I forgot to mention that another difference between M1 and IPM1 is the bar on the mantlet, on M1 it is straight while on IPM1 it has a sharp turn. Picture for reference: i.imgur.com/rEBF8z5.jpg Also, another difference between M1A2C and previous variants is a cutout at the bottom of the turret armor. Picture for reference: i.imgur.com/ULTcGnk.jpg
@@burnttoaster6313 Abrams never got DU in the hull, that is one of the major misconceptions, there was never need to add DU in the hull since even if added the protection would be inadequate and it would only add unnecessary weight. I dont know what changes have been done to M1A2C but up until, and including, M1A2 SEP V2, Abrams never had DU in the hull.
@براہمداغ There is the case of one challenger 2 getting its thermal sights knocked out by multiple RPG27s, but the tankis still function able and were back to combat condition in a few hours. The tank itself is fine.
@@shawnli9775 I understand you can't actually disable a tank like that. But in a real battleground, won't a tank loose loads of its effectiveness to a measly "rifle bullet to a delicate external sensor", in critical situations when the tank is needed the most. And the more critical a situation happens to be, the more bullets will be flying around.
0:56 IP model also has the rear turret basket. Original M1 did not. Very easy way to distinguish even at a distance, and you can see it in the images in the video. M1A1's turret basket is slightly different to the IP's
@@thenerd2446 I mean if you're planning to buy a tank but think they have tires then I'd suggest doing some more research before committing to anything.
Another distinguishing feature between the baseline M1 and the M1IP is the rearmost section of the side skirts; on the M1 it is triangular in shape, whereas on the M1IP and later Abrams models it is shaped like a sideways L (or in some cases removed altogether).
You’ll see M1A1s with/without it on, it just depends. There’s a classic pic of an Aussie M1 with a EC Tiger in the background with the old type of sprocket on it.
Those are not part of the sprocket. You can see them on modern day US Marine Corps tanks. It's to prevent throwing track. There's a reason you dont really see them on the SEP tanks but I'm not 100% sure why it changed. It wasn't variant specific so it's not mentioned as a visual difference. It was also not on every tank of those variants.
@@ItsATrap614 they have their pros and cons when compared. But the tank in question did prove it's worth and claim back in 1991. And the K2 isn't even on the same spectrum as the rest of the tanks mentioned, including the M1A2SEPv3, Markava, Challenger II, Type 10, and many other tanks around the world.
@@faq187tim9 actually it's not a bad tank. It has some features better than the Abrams and some that are lacking. Years ago it wasn't great, but has improved greatly over the years.
M1A2C turret armor modules are about 13 percent thicker (LOS) than previous M1A2 SEP. Also the shape of the front turret is subtlety different. I made comparison that are posted on the sturgeon forums.
But a LOT of IFV's got ATGM's on the turret side. Like the BMP and Bradley series. Not mentioning the BMPT-72 Terminator (my favourite). But a tank can make good use of ATGM's. The Russian tanks use them quite a lot. Fired from the main gun tho.
Turret side-mounted missiles look cool until you realize someone has to pop out of the hatches while carrying a missile to reload the launchers. Better stick with cannon-launched missiles :P
Much thanks comrade I’m a tank commander of Pok-Poong-Ho Tank, 3rd Tank Division of DPRKorean Ground Forces. And this is exactly what I needed. I shall utilize this knowledge to full use whenever I come across those fat tanks of Capitalist pigs. 고맙소 동무 항상 승전하시라요!
Excellent video as usual. I have one small nit to pick. Your pronunciation of "CROWS" is correct according to the rules. But we still say it like "Croh". Your English sounds like "Kraus" to English speaking ears. Because...English. ;)
Could you do an analysis video of Autoloader vs Manual Loader, I think that autoloader has gotten a reputation of being bad / inferior that is honestly unfair and inaccurate.
I’d say the hate comes from Russian bois saying manual loaders are useless and auto loaders are better knowing nothing about why a manual loader exists in the first place.
You seriously want a fucking analysis video about the difference of autoloader vs human loader? OK here is the diffetence: the autoloader reloads automatically, while the human loader loads manually. Was that really so hard? Geez people nowadays... 🙄
Good Video. M1A2C or sepV3 also has some extra hull armour. I suspect they feel that the performance of potential 130mm-152mm Apfsds and advanced HEAT warheads Is rather high.
you missed TUSK and TUSK 2 variants, they can be recognized by ERA pac kages on the side sjirts and remotely controlled m2 station on top(non low profile one) as well as m240 which cant move because of FCS
@@lukabogdanovic4658 He posted that comment 2 hours ago but Red posted the TUSK comment 1 hour ago but I think everybody should know that TUSK is just a kit, Tank Urban Survival "Kit"
The M1IP and the M1 also has 1 other difference. The M1IP "long hull" is essintaly a m1a1 turret without the 120mm smoothbore so the M1IP like the M1A1 has that rear storage rack.
Some of this info is wrong, the M1A1D did have CITVs installed but few were used in the US. The export version M1A1E was an A1 that had the digital improvements such as the crows and CITV installed onto the turret but had NO composite or DU armor.
Love the video! But could you perhaps add side-by-side photos of the differences between details of versions? Because things like those are easier to identify when you have seen both next to each other. Otherwise it's really great, just something I think would make it even better.
@@Brother_Nihilus Well you can easily tell that Tr-77-580 has side skirts (T-55 normally doesn't have side skirts), also has 6 road wheels instead of 5 and T-55 has different mud guard.
Nope, some did not. We got issued new M1IPs in '85, no rear basket but they did have the mount for the CITV. They also had been fitted the rear skirts without the cutaway, but were cut in place before delivery.
@@evtinker1814 but the M1IP never had mounts for CITV? the M1a1 was the first to feature the mouting hardware for a CITV. also the IPM1 was the first to mount a rear bustle every picture of IPM1's have rear bustles i think its likely the M1 you had was just a simply M1 that had been retrofitted with the newer rear side skirts.
@@nemisous83 Our M1IPs definitely had the mounts in front of the loader's hatch. We mounted the spare roadwheel on it. See: storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/26128244?profile=RESIZE_930x&width=737 You can also see, no bustle rack. As for the skirts, they were cut very jagged and rough. Remember the last skirt over the sprocket is only then aluminum, not armored. We were issued these in Vilseck, in Jan of 85
@@evtinker1814 okay I figured it out the late production IPM1's had the CITV mount because it shared the same turret as the M1A1 however the rear bustle rack can be seen in examples predating the M1A1 with MERDC camouflage. Its likely yours just didn't have it attached.
@@nemisous83 Yes, I recall they said ours were made to allow easy upgrade to M1A1 at a later date. We had tanks from both the Detroit and Lima plants, and they didn't quite match exactly. My platoon was all Detroit built, I am not sure how the Lima ones were different. After the M60A3s we really missed the bustle racks.
The m1a2 sepv2/3 will still be the best tank in the 2020's, It can easily penetrate the frontal armor of a T-72B3 at 3000m, while the T-72B3 will need a side shot or a lucky frontal hit or get within 1200m to get a frontal kill shot.
@RedEffect (or anyone) I just had a question: Why do tanks like the leopard 2 or Type 99 tanks use “arrow” shaped armor on their turrets?. Wouldn’t that just deflect a round into the hull and penetrate the weaker hull armor?
Apparently the spaced add-on armour modules on the turret front defeat a hollow charge prior to reaching the base armour, and causes kinetic-energy penetrators to change direction, eroding them in the process; it does not form a shot-trap, since it does not deflect the penetrators outwards to hit the hull or turret ring.
This Christmas tree turret is reason why armata is the best tank in the world. Armata is designed to accommodate all those things on turret in perfect way possible. Abrams is like; let's put it here and see what is gonna happen. From time to time is better to put white paper on table and do it right way then try solving existing problems.
You missed one visual difference between the M1 and M1IP, the rear drive wheel, it was bigger on the M1 and went over the track as you can see here 1:04 ( www.armorama.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=263662&page=1&ord=1 ) vs 1:08
Hey Red effect, in your opinion, the turret ring and the very sloaped upper plate act as a shot trap ? Or this is highly exagerrated by games such as War Thunder ?
You can't have led in the paint, but Depleted Uranium is OK! I know that unless it's lose, it isn't harmful, but so is lad in the paint, it's oxidized!
I had one drive over my hole during an exercise, you haven't lived until you see the bottom of an m1... We popped it in the ass with a practice LAW 😂 It made our 11b day though😘
when ut talking about comparing external parts of tanks, could you please show pictures or just add a text under so i know what is what, would be alot more clear. :)
Once you got to the SEPV2 you were getting it wrong. Check your facts and redo your video. If you want to know what changed you are more than welcomed to ask.
Anyone here know what happened the that guy named draff23 or something like that. They guy made videos about the f 35 and had a duck as his channel avatar?
You can identify them by being misused and getting their ammo racks blown up by insurgent ATGM's, which, at least when the blow out panels do their job, means a big, fat flame coming out of the rear of the turret. ;)
No The Israeli's have developed the LAHAT for their Merkava's 120mm, which is basically a licensed version L/44. Now the Abrams' M256 is basically based off the L/44, which doesn't necessarily mean the Abrams can shoot them, but the technology is there
Red can you do a video explaining why saudi and iraki m1 are getting destroyed so people know the real problem with m1 exports version instead of saying m1used by US is the same and therefore obselate
But if you got an old tank vs a modern tank then yes old will die but if you just use it in a good way, ie if there is another tank pull it back but if there is just apc or ifv its better then nothing to use set tank even if its old
The Tank Crew. If you put your tank in the middle of open field, your tank cannot protect itself because all tanks armor are focused on Turret. Body of the tanks are pretty weak. So you have to hide the body of the Tank, atgm cannot penetrate the turret armor.
@Ef77 It does not matter how much fuel a tank eats? Jesus Christ. When a tank needs more fuel than another tank then the radius it can operate in is tinier. And when one tank has 300 KM radius and the other tank has 400 KM range, the second tank has an huge advantage. The Leopard 2 engines have less fuel consumption (->bigger range), make less noise (smaller detection radius) and they can take every type of fuel you have. It can drive with Diesel, Cerosine and with normal fuel. (Sorry for bad english, english is not my motherlanguage).
@Ef77 You say that the engine detection radius isnt a thing anymore because modern armies can detect tanks kilometers away with their engine off? How about ISIS and other terrorist groups? They dont have this stuff. On modern battlegrounds you have to be more stealthy than the enemy. This also complies to tank engines.
Wainer Rinkler you do know that turbine engine are quieter than comparable Diesel engine, right? Read up why Abram was given the nickname “whispering death”
TUSK is an urban kit for any Abrams tank, it can be mounted on any Abrams, it is not a variant, its a kit.
I forgot to mention that another difference between M1 and IPM1 is the bar on the mantlet, on M1 it is straight while on IPM1 it has a sharp turn. Picture for reference:
i.imgur.com/rEBF8z5.jpg
Also, another difference between M1A2C and previous variants is a cutout at the bottom of the turret armor. Picture for reference:
i.imgur.com/ULTcGnk.jpg
RedEffect when did the abrams get depleted uranium in the hull?
alexander albornoz it never did
Sir I think you missed the D variant . However not sure whether it has any external difference or not ...
@@burnttoaster6313 Abrams never got DU in the hull, that is one of the major misconceptions, there was never need to add DU in the hull since even if added the protection would be inadequate and it would only add unnecessary weight. I dont know what changes have been done to M1A2C but up until, and including, M1A2 SEP V2, Abrams never had DU in the hull.
@Tonya Patrick Boy, what did he wrote up there?
It's interesting to see almost all nations are just adding more and more stuff on the roof.
Pool ☝️
Doesn't that make a tank fragile? All those delicate ass sensors etc?
@براہمداغ There is the case of one challenger 2 getting its thermal sights knocked out by multiple RPG27s, but the tankis still function able and were back to combat condition in a few hours. The tank itself is fine.
Have u seen the North Korean tanks, they have a rocket on top
@@shawnli9775 I understand you can't actually disable a tank like that.
But in a real battleground, won't a tank loose loads of its effectiveness to a measly "rifle bullet to a delicate external sensor", in critical situations when the tank is needed the most.
And the more critical a situation happens to be, the more bullets will be flying around.
0:56 IP model also has the rear turret basket. Original M1 did not. Very easy way to distinguish even at a distance, and you can see it in the images in the video.
M1A1's turret basket is slightly different to the IP's
“Changes letter from U to M” alright boys this bad boy is undefeatable
K-pop fans be like:
OMG! Which one’s cuter??
oh...oooooh you cheeky bastard hahah thats a good one, took me a second but i got it lool.
Mohammed Hersi
I don't get it. Explain?
@@combativeThinker He means Asian people look alike, just like the tanks in this video all pretty much look alike.
This is good to know so people can’t pull a fast one when I buy a second hand Tank from Ebay.
TheLuchsKing gotta kick the Tires and check the Oil and Engine. On Second thought I’ll buy a T-90 instead because why buy American Junk?!
@@thenerd2446 I mean if you're planning to buy a tank but think they have tires then I'd suggest doing some more research before committing to anything.
Man, I hate it when I get scammed into buying an Abrams with only a 105 mm gun, no thermal sights and no DU armour!
to do yeah something did feel off about it but they insisted it’s normal.
to do they told me all the best Tanks use Good Year!
Another distinguishing feature between the baseline M1 and the M1IP is the rearmost section of the side skirts; on the M1 it is triangular in shape, whereas on the M1IP and later Abrams models it is shaped like a sideways L (or in some cases removed altogether).
Missed out on M1A1 Heavy Common(HC) variant, the one specifically made for Marines and used up to this day. Though it did appear on video at 3:56
Nobody:
Gaijin and War Thunder Devs: *_Write that down, write that down_*
Im surprised you didn't mention the biggest visual diff between M1 and M1A1 - rear drive wheel on M1 has big overlap on outside of track.
i dont think all M1s had that tho. If u look at the pics in the video some M1s have that while others have the one that looks the same as the M1A1s.
You’ll see M1A1s with/without it on, it just depends. There’s a classic pic of an Aussie M1 with a EC Tiger in the background with the old type of sprocket on it.
Marco Chan because the M1(IP) had them fixed. If they have it like the M1A1s, it's most likely M1 Improved
Those are not part of the sprocket. You can see them on modern day US Marine Corps tanks. It's to prevent throwing track. There's a reason you dont really see them on the SEP tanks but I'm not 100% sure why it changed. It wasn't variant specific so it's not mentioned as a visual difference. It was also not on every tank of those variants.
Served on the M1,M1IP,M1A1,Aim,and M1A2 great platform, unmatched anywhere in the world
K2 Black Panther, Leopard 2a7 and arguably Leclerc are objectively better tanks than the Abrams so I wouldn't exactly call it "unmatched".
@@ItsATrap614 Wtf the leclerc is garbage
So you definitely spotted all the missed changes and mistakes as well.
@@ItsATrap614 they have their pros and cons when compared. But the tank in question did prove it's worth and claim back in 1991. And the K2 isn't even on the same spectrum as the rest of the tanks mentioned, including the M1A2SEPv3, Markava, Challenger II, Type 10, and many other tanks around the world.
@@faq187tim9 actually it's not a bad tank. It has some features better than the Abrams and some that are lacking. Years ago it wasn't great, but has improved greatly over the years.
5:25 am, no sleep. Been lying in bed for 7 hours now, nothing. Despite my best efforts, I live to my profiles namesake.
lmao
Does this happen often? You should ask your doctor for a sleep study. You might have a serious problem.
Take a chill pill, hahahaha, it's the only way for insomniacs, like us!
Same, except I can't stay asleep
Hello there
M1A2C turret armor modules are about 13 percent thicker (LOS) than previous M1A2 SEP. Also the shape of the front turret is subtlety different. I made comparison that are posted on the sturgeon forums.
I thought they installed missiles to side of the tanks like in Command and Conquer, looks cool but impractical.
But a LOT of IFV's got ATGM's on the turret side. Like the BMP and Bradley series. Not mentioning the BMPT-72 Terminator (my favourite).
But a tank can make good use of ATGM's. The Russian tanks use them quite a lot. Fired from the main gun tho.
@@Brother_Nihilus Didn't some Yugoslav T-55s also have external ATGMs?
@@jeffkardosjr.3825 That I am not sure about. Better check that
The Russian terminator is just like that.
Turret side-mounted missiles look cool until you realize someone has to pop out of the hatches while carrying a missile to reload the launchers. Better stick with cannon-launched missiles :P
M1 Carabine
M1 Abrahams
M1 Thomason
M1 Garand
M1 Motorway
M1 Electric Trolley
M1 Crossbow
M1 Strollwell
M1 Bazooka
M1 Mortar
M1 Bayonet
M1 Mine
M1 Helmet
M1 BMW
M1 Combat car
M1 Howitzer
Press *M1* to pay Respekt
M1 Garand
M1 Submachine Gun
@@felixdunkelmut9624 M1 mine
"Abrahams"
MY EYES
pls stop this already
Anyone got more for the list¿
Its m3 stuart and m4 sherman but ok
Quick note, there are still some SEPv2s rolling around without CROWS or the backup camera, all the internal electronics are the same.
Well, you missed the TUSK package (It's not a variant tho)
Much thanks comrade
I’m a tank commander of Pok-Poong-Ho Tank, 3rd Tank Division of DPRKorean Ground Forces. And this is exactly what I needed.
I shall utilize this knowledge to full use whenever I come across those fat tanks of Capitalist pigs.
고맙소 동무
항상 승전하시라요!
Excellent video as usual. I have one small nit to pick. Your pronunciation of "CROWS" is correct according to the rules. But we still say it like "Croh". Your English sounds like "Kraus" to English speaking ears. Because...English. ;)
I thought on M1IP the IP was for improved particulate. It has a big box on rear near exhaust.
It’s 6 in da morning.. I’m ready to go differentiate M1 Tanks!
You need to make these tank spotters guide for Soviet tanks and others.
Could you do an analysis video of Autoloader vs Manual Loader, I think that autoloader has gotten a reputation of being bad / inferior that is honestly unfair and inaccurate.
Davega i agree, people always think autoloaders are made out of paper and get shut down easily
I’d say the hate comes from Russian bois saying manual loaders are useless and auto loaders are better knowing nothing about why a manual loader exists in the first place.
@@hazardous458 There are hate coming from both sides.
You seriously want a fucking analysis video about the difference of autoloader vs human loader? OK here is the diffetence: the autoloader reloads automatically, while the human loader loads manually. Was that really so hard? Geez people nowadays... 🙄
@@xAlexTobiasxB Are you dense ? I've seen you addressing the Type 10 question and your comments get progressively more brain-dead
Good Video. M1A2C or sepV3 also has some extra hull armour. I suspect they feel that the performance of potential 130mm-152mm Apfsds and advanced HEAT warheads Is rather high.
Very good. Precise, articulate, informative and enjoyable as ever, thanks
Thx for the upload RedEffect
you missed TUSK and TUSK 2 variants, they can be recognized by ERA pac kages on the side sjirts and remotely controlled m2 station on top(non low profile one) as well as m240 which cant move because of FCS
Look at the first comment
@@lukabogdanovic4658 He posted that comment 2 hours ago but Red posted the TUSK comment 1 hour ago but I think everybody should know that TUSK is just a kit, Tank Urban Survival "Kit"
@@plaguedoctor9126 yes evrybody accept him
Nope. Nope. Nope. Kits, not variants.
Hey could you do a video about the romanian tank TR-85m1?
Yes is a good ideea
Leopard or challenger series next please.
How to recognize different Abrams tank variants?
BASKETS
The M1IP and the M1 also has 1 other difference. The M1IP "long hull" is essintaly a m1a1 turret without the 120mm smoothbore so the M1IP like the M1A1 has that rear storage rack.
Some of this info is wrong, the M1A1D did have CITVs installed but few were used in the US. The export version M1A1E was an A1 that had the digital improvements such as the crows and CITV installed onto the turret but had NO composite or DU armor.
The more they added stuff on their roof, the more Russian HE shell smiling over Abrams
War Thunder player detected
Lol
Tenk expert :v
Oof, i'm starting to like this =)
Not how He works.
You missed the M1A2-MEME (Mobility Enhanced Mission Electronics). Which has 3 Prius engines in place of the turbine for better eco points.
Love the video! But could you perhaps add side-by-side photos of the differences between details of versions? Because things like those are easier to identify when you have seen both next to each other. Otherwise it's really great, just something I think would make it even better.
You should make a T-54/55 spotters guide. (Including the Am1, 2,3 and maybe the Tr-77/85/850 series)
theyre easy to tell apart
Than you tell me the difference between a T-55A and a Tr-77-580.
I will wait
@@Brother_Nihilus those are like romanian t-55s which are shitty but ppl admire them? Idk i never saw ones you talk about i speak for all others,
@@Brother_Nihilus Well you can easily tell that Tr-77-580 has side skirts (T-55 normally doesn't have side skirts), also has 6 road wheels instead of 5 and T-55 has different mud guard.
@@plaguedoctor9126 I did not expect for you to respond this well.
minor inaccuracy. the IPM1 was the first to mount the rear turret basket.
Nope, some did not. We got issued new M1IPs in '85, no rear basket but they did have the mount for the CITV. They also had been fitted the rear skirts without the cutaway, but were cut in place before delivery.
@@evtinker1814 but the M1IP never had mounts for CITV? the M1a1 was the first to feature the mouting hardware for a CITV. also the IPM1 was the first to mount a rear bustle every picture of IPM1's have rear bustles i think its likely the M1 you had was just a simply M1 that had been retrofitted with the newer rear side skirts.
@@nemisous83 Our M1IPs definitely had the mounts in front of the loader's hatch. We mounted the spare roadwheel on it. See: storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/26128244?profile=RESIZE_930x&width=737
You can also see, no bustle rack.
As for the skirts, they were cut very jagged and rough. Remember the last skirt over the sprocket is only then aluminum, not armored. We were issued these in Vilseck, in Jan of 85
@@evtinker1814 okay I figured it out the late production IPM1's had the CITV mount because it shared the same turret as the M1A1 however the rear bustle rack can be seen in examples predating the M1A1 with MERDC camouflage. Its likely yours just didn't have it attached.
@@nemisous83 Yes, I recall they said ours were made to allow easy upgrade to M1A1 at a later date. We had tanks from both the Detroit and Lima plants, and they didn't quite match exactly. My platoon was all Detroit built, I am not sure how the Lima ones were different. After the M60A3s we really missed the bustle racks.
M1A2 SEP TUSK. Looks like a parade float lol
Good review... surprised the under armour APU took so long to get going as this was a major failing
Cool
The m1a2 sepv2/3 will still be the best tank in the 2020's, It can easily penetrate the frontal armor of a T-72B3 at 3000m, while the T-72B3 will need a side shot or a lucky frontal hit or get within 1200m to get a frontal kill shot.
It's a very beautiful vehicle.
Could you make a video of how to differentiate the leopard 2 variants and how to identify their year of production?
@RedEffect (or anyone) I just had a question: Why do tanks like the leopard 2 or Type 99 tanks use “arrow” shaped armor on their turrets?. Wouldn’t that just deflect a round into the hull and penetrate the weaker hull armor?
Apparently the spaced add-on armour modules on the turret front defeat a hollow charge prior to reaching the base armour, and causes kinetic-energy penetrators to change direction, eroding them in the process; it does not form a shot-trap, since it does not deflect the penetrators outwards to hit the hull or turret ring.
This Christmas tree turret is reason why armata is the best tank in the world. Armata is designed to accommodate all those things on turret in perfect way possible. Abrams is like; let's put it here and see what is gonna happen. From time to time is better to put white paper on table and do it right way then try solving existing problems.
You missed one visual difference between the M1 and M1IP, the rear drive wheel, it was bigger on the M1 and went over the track as you can see here 1:04 ( www.armorama.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=263662&page=1&ord=1 ) vs 1:08
Great vid 👍 next can you do a “is it obsolete” video on the ariete series? Or a variant guide if there are enough to warrant its own vid
could you make a vid about the challenger 2, I see a lot of confliction opinions about her.
He already did
i think you missed the M1A1HC (Heavy Common) but im not sure how much different it is from the HA
My t-90 crew thanks you
Cпасибо тебе
at least when i play War Thunder, i will say
"There is Abrams" lmao
(Technically) You missed the m1 thumper, a one off prototype with a greatly elongated turret and a 140mm gun
Well if including prototypes, then there is also the offer that was to give M60s an Abrams turrets. With foreign sales in mind.
Hey Red effect, in your opinion, the turret ring and the very sloaped upper plate act as a shot trap ? Or this is highly exagerrated by games such as War Thunder ?
You can't have led in the paint, but Depleted Uranium is OK! I know that unless it's lose, it isn't harmful, but so is lad in the paint, it's oxidized!
I had one drive over my hole during an exercise, you haven't lived until you see the bottom of an m1...
We popped it in the ass with a practice LAW 😂
It made our 11b day though😘
Ow yeah there's alot tank expert in the comment
Well yewtube is the tank expert academy, didn't you know?...
what if people stuck find at an angle to make hesh spin even if the gun was a smoothbore?
Can you make a video about the US Army Bradley vs US Abram tank vs US striker apc please. I want to see which is best for today’s war.
Could you do a video on the Pakistani army armoured Corp please
How much plate armour can the average goat carry? What is the usual armament?
@@circleofsorrow4583 They can carry a Javelin, so they make for solid tank destroyers.
@@abramar123 not to mention great emergency rations when separated from your FB.
Please make a video about EE-T1 Osorio. Thanks!
Good video but I feel like foreign variants like the Australian Abrams would've been good too
Please do the same for soviet tanks. It is really informational
Ooooh, so the M1A2 ALSO gets Trophy? Interesting.
Doesn't the IP mean improved protection? Because that's all that was changed on the tank.
Nice soundtrack
Could you make a Challenger 2 RBSL video?
Why do tanks use DU armor, isn’t tungsten just as dense? Why not use tungsten?
IP M1 actually stands for improve performance
Can you please made a video about pt91 tank..is it good enough to compete againts more modern tank today
This tank is named in the honor of General Creighton Abrams.
when ut talking about comparing external parts of tanks, could you please show pictures or just add a text under so i know what is what, would be alot more clear. :)
Red effect what tanks do you like because I can't tell if like you the Abrams or not?
Konkurs : Hi abrams, how are you?
Type 01 LMAT: Hi T-90A-chan!
Ok i picked that one only so i could add weeb suffix.
Cool vid
Can we get video on romanian TR 85 M1
What is the name of the music that plays at the very end?
Red effect can you make a video on french leclerc tanks
He already did
Red what is the diference in Armor effecness of M1A1HA and M1A2?
M1A2 has newer DU armor plates in the turret and I mean protection got increased
And what about TUSK?
Didnt IP in IPM1 mean Increased protection
Slightly
Once you got to the SEPV2 you were getting it wrong. Check your facts and redo your video. If you want to know what changed you are more than welcomed to ask.
Anyone here know what happened the that guy named draff23 or something like that. They guy made videos about the f 35 and had a duck as his channel avatar?
what about the TUSK 1 and TUSK 2?
TUSK is the add-on ERA package for urban enviroment for the SEP variant
Make a video about Infographic's show:America vs the world.
Do it.
bet you wont.
whats the song on the outtro?
What about Egypt and Iraq m1a1 and Saudi m1a2s
You can identify them by being misused and getting their ammo racks blown up by insurgent ATGM's, which, at least when the blow out panels do their job, means a big, fat flame coming out of the rear of the turret. ;)
Prototype M1 Thumper
TUSK version ??
Does the m1a2 have anti tank missiles ?
No
The Israeli's have developed the LAHAT for their Merkava's 120mm, which is basically a licensed version L/44. Now the Abrams' M256 is basically based off the L/44, which doesn't necessarily mean the Abrams can shoot them, but the technology is there
Red can you do a video explaining why saudi and iraki m1 are getting destroyed so people know the real problem with m1 exports version instead of saying m1used by US is the same and therefore obselate
Every tank is not bad
But if you got an old tank vs a modern tank then yes old will die but if you just use it in a good way, ie if there is another tank pull it back but if there is just apc or ifv its better then nothing to use set tank even if its old
Except Bob semple
@@nsms1297 There's a reason why the Japanese never touched New Zealand
The Tank Crew.
If you put your tank in the middle of open field, your tank cannot protect itself because all tanks armor are focused on Turret. Body of the tanks are pretty weak.
So you have to hide the body of the Tank, atgm cannot penetrate the turret armor.
😊👍👍👍
If you see one run.
She's still a beast merica fuck yea
What about the USMC M1A1s and National Guard M1A1's
How to recognize different SOVIET(RUSSIAN) tank variants?
He has done it already on T-72
TUSK Variants
M1 engine ia the best 👍
meh, it eats too much fuel. The Leopard 2 engine is better
@Ef77 It does not matter how much fuel a tank eats? Jesus Christ. When a tank needs more fuel than another tank then the radius it can operate in is tinier. And when one tank has 300 KM radius and the other tank has 400 KM range, the second tank has an huge advantage. The Leopard 2 engines have less fuel consumption (->bigger range), make less noise (smaller detection radius) and they can take every type of fuel you have. It can drive with Diesel, Cerosine and with normal fuel. (Sorry for bad english, english is not my motherlanguage).
@Ef77 You say that the engine detection radius isnt a thing anymore because modern armies can detect tanks kilometers away with their engine off? How about ISIS and other terrorist groups? They dont have this stuff. On modern battlegrounds you have to be more stealthy than the enemy. This also complies to tank engines.
Wainer Rinkler you do know that turbine engine are quieter than comparable Diesel engine, right? Read up why Abram was given the nickname “whispering death”
@@Exteriorbean I did not know that
👍🏾
Safe the T80✊
And people think identifying russian tanks is hard lol