Deflection of Beams Problem | Macaulay's Method | simply supported beam | GATE

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 окт 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @massivelystressed2099
    @massivelystressed2099 2 года назад +13

    Easy explanation for such a complicated concept.. you saved me.
    Thank you so much sir 🙏

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад +3

      You are most welcome. Kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @lukhonabawuti7147
    @lukhonabawuti7147 2 года назад +8

    Perfectly explained Sir thanks for the content!

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад +1

      Thanks for the comment. Kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @PereraArunodha
    @PereraArunodha 11 месяцев назад +2

    Perfect sir😊❤

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  11 месяцев назад

      Keep watching. Kindly subscribe to the channel.

  • @santhoshramv9036
    @santhoshramv9036 2 года назад +2

    Nice explanation sir and understandable sir

  • @vedsoni3600
    @vedsoni3600 2 года назад +4

    I had one question: When integrating (x-3), why do we consider that as a single term? If we integrate them individually [(x^2/2)-(3*x)], this will change the value of C1 later on giving us different answers.

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад +5

      We should consider (x-3) as a single term. Because, it represents the distance of load 40KN from the reference as a single term. The whole term 40(x-3) is the moment of 40 KN load fro the reference.

    • @okunlolafz
      @okunlolafz Год назад +1

      @@michaelthomasrex I have been searching for answer to this question for a very long time. I'm so glad I came across your video and this reply. Thank you so much!

  • @indianmusicvibrations3758
    @indianmusicvibrations3758 2 года назад +2

    Thanks you very much Sir!.... 🥰

  • @galibshaikh3632
    @galibshaikh3632 10 месяцев назад +1

    Subscribing because of your this wonderful explanation!!! Thanks sir🫂

  • @-ShahjebChoudhury
    @-ShahjebChoudhury 2 года назад +1

    Nice video 👍 it is understandable

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад

      Thanks for your comments. Kindly subscribe to the channel.

  • @gajjivijay8207
    @gajjivijay8207 2 года назад +2

    Sir there is 45kN but u tack 40 kN

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад +3

      In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @sadhvikbutti.sadhvik2987
    @sadhvikbutti.sadhvik2987 6 месяцев назад

    Sir Ra+Rb=48+45=93
    But u consider 48+40=88

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  5 месяцев назад

      "There's a typo in the question; please consider replacing '45' with '40'."

  • @syedjawaharhussain3208
    @syedjawaharhussain3208 2 года назад +1

    Ra+Rb=93 not 88 that means 48+45=93

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 года назад +1

      In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Now, Ra+Rb=88 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

    • @rohitsomware
      @rohitsomware Год назад

      48+40 ahe re...