High Amperage Free Energy Generator Tutorial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 мар 2023
- Free Energy generator tutorial. This generator could run your home or electric car. The generator is a Faraday mono-pole generator, also called a homo-polar generator, or a Faraday disk. There is no lens law effect, so you can get over-unity easily. The generator does not work at low speeds, though. You need at least a 6" neodymium magnet and to spin it at 5000RPM. Anything less than than this is a waste of time! The generator does not work at low speeds. The N-machine had 2 (approx.) 12" discs in series, putting out 3.25V and 780A at 2500RPM. That's 1 volt per 81ft/s of the outside of the disc. With that math, you would need 3090RPM with the 6" disc to get 1 volt. You can set the magnet in shrinking epoxy to put a static centripetal force on the magnet so it does not fly apart at high speeds. Use low-temperature solder for a liquid metal brush. You need high-speed bearings, and you want to keep the metal bearings and anything magnetic as far away from the rotor as you can, because this will create drag and slow down the rotor.
There are a few other ways to design this generator.
Telegram discussion group: t.me/+m6vxnlkCmvo1MDQx 
Наука
Someone said "Einstein from Teemu" ahahahaha
They were used comercialy to power arc furnaces to melt aluminum back in the 40s there is like a 10 ton one on display at some college I think on the east coast.
Also I believe the rail road uses a similar system except it has 2 star shaped rotors and a electromagnet in between with a steel stator looks like a car alternator without stator windings just like 50 steel poles
‘So how many amps does this deliver?”
_”High Amperage, loads of amperage...”_
“But how many amps are we talking about?”
_”Oh you a get Amps out the wazoo.”_
“Ok, Ok, I get that, but how many Tesla, how many RPMs give you *how many amps* and at what voltage?
_”Oh you get as many amps as you want”_
“So you have no Idea do ya?”
_”Bags and bags of amps!”_
“Gotta go.”
I had a chuckle reading this. I think one of DePalma's machines was 1.05A and 1600A (1680W), and something like 10000 RPM and 2 10" discs in series. DePalma's machines were not that great but did demonstrate over-unity. There's easier and cheaper ways to build the generator, but it still costs money.
@@QuantumEnergySearchYou can still take in much more energy than you give out. n machine that can run itself.
Two of these, counter rotating achieves inverted pendulum, tightrope monorail.
Thankyou so very much!!
Thanks for sharing, I'm looking into one of your classes to see if I can learn.
So the N Machine has twelve outside brush contact that touches through the entire circumference. If this works why is it not used?
I made a ball-bearing motor years ago. What I can remember is that it used quite a bit of current. I had it hooked up to a microwave transformer. That I modified it by removing the secondary and replacing it with 3 or 4 turns of thick wire. It did run.
Remember to first remove all the grease from the bearings.
@@BryanWood1I would add graphite powder since it’s conductive and it’s very good as a lubricant
Hello,
has anyone tried a homopolar generator composed of two counter-rotating discs touching each other on the circumference (like a gearbox, except that their circumferences are smooth), which are of different radii (i.e. different speeds, i.e. different currents probably leading to a higher voltage), and when the current is taken from both shafts (between the shafts) and not between the shaft and the disc circumference? I'm no DIYer, but maybe someone would like to try it.
Tesla's patent and the N-machine both had two discs connected in series to double the voltage.
@@QuantumEnergySearchYes, but if I'm not mistaken, they are two identical discs at the same speed. Voltage is created in the differences between two systems. I assume that the increase in voltage (for the mentioned series connection) is caused by the increased resistance. What I mentioned is also a series connection and at different speeds.
@@zdenekbreza3770 it's the same as two batteries in series, double voltage and half current.
Wait you might be on to something here! I was thinking of a spiral coil too which would make higher voltage at lower rpm's.
Is it possible to generate amps with this homo-polar generator and add these amps to a generator that produces more volts than amps to end up with a very powerfull electric generator.? does this make sense? thanks Deryck
It's better to use a simple circuit to generate 14V+ pulses which dump into a battery and use an inverter. Anything is possible, but it's better to use the simplest method, not just for initial cost but because machines can break down.
I'm thinking it's possible to generate volts at the same time with a coil, but I don't know how to put a coil inside the generator. We then would feed voltage pulses to the coil, and harvest the inductive kickback which should in theory have a risen amperage curve as the unipolar induction would synergize with self-induction.
@@fxeconomist Perhaps we could use coils as stators over the disk and excite them at their resonant frequency to produce high voltage over it? The disks in analog watt hour meters have perforations across the disk which act as build up spots for the electrostatic charge which aids in the disks rotation, using bifilar coils would further raise the voltage gain.
@@JenkoRun Maybe, but it should not work. The 2nd Faraday paradox states that if the disk is not moving while the magnet is moving, nothing is produced. I would absolutely take a stator design over a rotor, if possible. Initial tests I've done in December show that there is amperage in the rotor coil moving along the magnet. Not the barbaric 50-100A I've got between the steel covers and magnets, but about 4-10A. I think I could get even more in the current setup, but I am still waiting for the engineers to fix it, because it has horrible wobble. I got these numbers at around 15% duty cycle. I could not get anything at higher numbers because the coil has some swollen area on it and it hits the brush wire at too high speeds, maintaining contact too less time. I just returned to UK yesterday and will check with the engineers today to see if the assembly is done and we're set for the next phase. I think I could push numbers to about 20A in the coil, and technically more could be done if the sandwich would be tighter. There are about 5mm between the each magnet and its side of the coil.
@@fxeconomist In regards to that specific Faraday Paradox it's not actually a paradox but a misunderstanding of how the magnetic fields of a magnet work, it was touched upon in the video but the fields don't rotate with the magnet and that's because the magnetic field is Ab-Extra to it, when you take a uniform ring magnet and spin it pole down it wouldn't have any effect on the field and hence no current is produced, but if you rotated the ring magnet on its side then you'd definitely see current showing up in the disk.
Think of an air fan and pointing it straight up, when you rotate the fan it will have no effect on the air vortex unless you angle it away from its straight vertical direction, as the air is ab-extra to the fan so to is the magnetic field ab-extra to the magnet, this explains both why spinning the magnet alone doesn't do anything but spinning it attached to the disk will.
Touching on the watt hour meter again I'd like to quote this Amazon review from "The Awesome Life Force" by Joseph H. Cater which covers most of what I could say in the same way:
"One of the best examples of lucid thought on scientific principles is the notion, made evident by Mr. Cater, that electrostatics can become manifest by simply spinning a metal disk at a relatively high rate of motion (see chapter 22 - page 289, "The Searl Effect and the UFO Phenomena"). This brings to mind the spinning aluminum disk in an electromechanical watt-hour meter (that old thingy). Its spin can be brought on by electrostatic forces operating on that disk as the result of aluminum reflecting magnetic forces away from that disk.
The watt-hour meter's braking magnet reintroduces ferromagnetic force upon its aluminum disk to prevent it from accelerating to a theoretical limit of infinity. This exhibition of an overunity production of energetic motion parallels the infinite acceleration of spinning metallic disks described at the very start of Mr. Cater's chapter 22.
The electromagnet coils - both the voltage and current coils suspended from the laminate armature at the back end of a watt-hour meter - would have induced a dominant electromagnetic field within the meter's spin-able disk. But the aluminum material, comprising said disk, prevents magnetism from dominating the electrostatic behavior of the meter's disk since aluminum wants to resist and reflect both magnetic fields.
The perforations on a watt-hour meter's disk are intended to magnify electrostatic forces accumulating around the sharp edges of each perforation, and thus magnify the disk's rate of spin. Reducing the tendency for a disk to warp over time is another trivial benefit of its perforation.
This acceleration of an aluminum disk - when it reaches a minimum rate of spin - is at the heart of what I believe could become a revival of Tesla's Special Generator described towards the back of William Lyne's book, " Pentagon Aliens " - a generator with no moving parts capable of lasting 5,000 years (according to Tesla) and self-running just like a Searle disk.
I believe it is a salient feature of Tesla's Special Generator that it harnesses 200 pounds of iron for every single horsepower added to its output by magnetic coupling with its iron chassis. Thus, it can remove a small portion of magnetism surrounding a Searle disk to further boost its electrostatic charge (and achieve self-induced acceleration) via asymmetry between its electric and magnetic fields.
The Searle disk does this in a very impractical way by attracting a flow of air along its axes on one side of the disk and cast this air outward along that same side while performing the opposite effect on the flipside: it sucks air inward along the opposing face while propelling this air outward along its opposing axle on side 'B', thus providing lift of the entire disk. Thus, no loss of efficiency occurs. The Searle Effect makes use of both propulsive and reactive forces to guide it along a singular line of motion without inducing any competing forces to reduce its efficiency. But it does this at the expense of flying off into space!
So whereas, the Searle disk whisks electrostatically charged air along its surface and thus depletes any possible buildup of magnetic field (creating an asymmetrical preponderance of electric fields dominating over magnetic fields), Tesla's arrangement provides for this same whisking effect but using iron instead of a flow of fresh air while allowing its architect to design control into its operation by regulating how much magnetic field is whisked away from the spinning disk/s by using a set amount of iron magnetically coupled to an iron chassis surrounding these disks."
I can't comment on the Searle disk since I've not looked into it, but the point Vinyasi makes here about the interaction of the electrostatic and magnetic fields on aluminum feels important.
If we humor the following idea for a moment, that the high voltage coil is what provides the "seed" energy and frequency to act as the catalyst while the disk builds up electrostatic tension which is greatly aided by the perforations, which is then converted into magnetic current as a closed circuit is made with the rest of the house's circuits and the unbalanced Amp coils provide the direction of spin, this is also mentioned in the interview with William Lyne and Paul Scarzo - 33rd Parallel, excerpt.
This also implies that the higher the frequency supplied to disk from the catalyst the higher the output become which would further lower the RPM required for the same output, this may also make Aluminum a requirement over Copper. This makes the disk itself the actual power supplier (at the time before smart meters) to the house with the current being created by the disk and sent back to the grid.
This is why I'm thinking of using electromagnets, specifically Tesla's Bifilar coils, as stators for the disk to provide the voltage, but I can think of other uses for the design as well such as combining permanent magnets with the electromagnets and powering them with the output, as the current increases the coils get stronger which just feeds back into itself, this design somewhat parallels the design Tesla talks about in his Notes on a Unipolar Dynamo and its self-exciting action. Perhaps this could be related to why Tesla named the patent as "Coil for Electromagnets" ?
I'm not certain of any of this mind you, I'm just going of what I've been able to put together from sources all over the place along with my own understanding and intuition.
Fantastic, there's also another design of this Unipolar Generator but instead of avoiding Lenz it redirects it to assist, the performance can be drastically increased by cutting spiral subdivisions into the disk as Tesla showed in his Notes on a Unipolar Dynamo, it lowers the resistance and increases the current output while also increasing the voltage potential between the axle and disk as more current flows through the external circuit, this happens because the EM Retardation (Lenz) has a new path of least resistance to follow, which also has the added benefit of reducing the RPM required to achieve the same Watt output.
Since the stronger the magnetic field the disk is immersed in the stronger the current output perhaps Tesla's Bifilar Electromagnets could be used as stators over the disk and connected to the disk output to increase its own EM field? They would get stronger as the output increases, which in turn would further feed itself. Perhaps a combination of permanent magnets and bifilar electromagnets?
Can the high amps be extracted from the disk by having the other lead on the other end of the axle similar to the bearing motor design or is direct extraction from the disk edge required?
There's 2 ways to build it, one is like a cylinder and the other is from the center to the outside. You can use a bearing instead of brushes if it's built right.
@@QuantumEnergySearch When you say like a cylinder do you mean bearings on both ends of the axle with the electrodes on each, and the disk producing the amps in the middle? I'm looking at different designs that go with a few ideas I have but there a few complications, if I can extract the produced Amps from the disk through the axle on the other side of the disk with bearings as the brushes that would work for my project, but I'm looking for confirmation that the amps produced from the disk can traverse down the axle and be taken off from the other end without resistance issues, or if the design with the disk requires the contact to be on the edge, cheers.
@@JenkoRun There's an arrangement that looks like a cylinder and it looks different, but it's the same principle. I learned this from a class from Sir Timothy and there's a confidentiality agreement so I can't give any more details. However, there's lots of info on the net about these types of generators.
@@QuantumEnergySearch I've not heard of Sir Timothy before so I guess I'll need to do a little looking around, since this cylinder design is not the same as the disk design does this mean I should not be attempting to draw the disk amps from the axle on the other side and attempting to do would be pointless? The disk type is the only one I currently have at my disposal to experiment with, so I'm just trying to find out if Amp extraction in the disk design must be from the disk edge as a requirement, I realize this might seem like a major beginner question as I'm just lacking in information on some of the basics, ty.
@@JenkoRun Sir T is the spokesman, teacher & engineer for WITTS. Use a really big strong neodymium magnet and and spin it really fast. There's a lot of people trying to get this to work on RUclips, and it doesn't really start working until you have very very fast tangential velocity on the outside of the disk. So you want really strong magnetism and lots and lots of speed. It doesn't have to be very big. There's a design they did that was very small and simple, I almost forgot about it but I think it was actually self-running and 200-300% efficient. You can take a class from WITTS. Their classes are very cheap compared to the total cost of a project.
What happens when you short out the terminals after letting it get up to speed? Do you try that?
It will destroy the brushes.
Is the disc required because you need a rotational gradient or would a drum also work?
There's different ways to make them, they are easy to find on the Internet. You won't find much information on getting an over-unity generator like this. The ministry has done some very small ones that are over-unity. There's no dominant energy, it only requires good engineering. Depalma's machines tended to be very big and cumbersome, now that we have neodymium magnets, they can be made very small.
I can't find any training courses on the website. Can you point me in the right direction ?
You can get a one hour consultation at witts.ws/gifts it's a good deal considering these projects cost a few thousand dollars, and you can talk to someone who has made them work successfully.
I know im not the smartest guy in any room, but is there anyway to convert the amp to volts? I understand a typical transformer and how the overall power being watts can be transformed back and forth from high volts low amp, to high amp low volt but i heard these guys say this device is producing both DC, and AC at the same time, how? I have been doing tutorials on electronics and the basic theory for a couple months and thought i had a small foundation, now i feel like im completely in the dark again.
Yes. There's different ways to do it. With A/C it's easy because you just use a transformer. At 100% efficient the watts in = watts out, a watt being volt x amp. So 1 volt at 10 amps is the same amount of power as 10 volts at 1 amp. With DC, you need a different setup, like pulsing an inductor or charging capacitors in parallel and putting them in series to step up the voltage. You can buy devices that do this. It's difficult to work with a lot of power (watts) with low voltages, because the amps are so high. The higher the amps, the heavier the wire needs to be. This is true with AC and DC. However, with AC, the higher the frequency, the smaller the wire can be and less iron needed in motors and transformers. This is why 50hz is terrible, because motors and transformers have to be heavier. At 400hz, the wire only has to be 1/16th the size. They use 400hz in airplanes and backpack military equipment for this reason. Eric Dollard has spoken about this. (Eric has some good power engineering stuff but never actually gets anywhere in terms of building free energy systems.)
The motor describe on page 34:40 also came out in another video with explanation. That said the current through the shaft must pass through and heat up expand some steel balls more than the rest in the group. And by expanding and contracting produces a differential force in a single radial direction - because of gravity one or two facing the ground always conduct the most current explains the selective heating.
Model on page 34:34 is not what Michael Faraday proposed on page 36:22.
Because the B field is focused on a small area on the copper disc.
Need help to understand the power coming from a washer machine motor pump. If you spin the motor The power coming out of it does not give you shock and you can work with bare cables though its running. The issue comes when you connect to charge a battery or a DC motor that has permanent magnets. Its very high power that you cant use digital multimeter at a certain soeed
. All digital and analog multimeters brow up. Has any of you tried this experiment and how can one make useable power beyond just lights. Am stuck at the his point.
You need to use diodes that can handle the voltage spike and dump all the energy into a battery or a number of batteries. Then run your device off the batteries. The voltage from those types of generators is very high, so you could probably have a string of 10-20 12V batteries easily.
@@QuantumEnergySearch That's true. The BMS of my battery pack is gone.
@@QuantumEnergySearch Thanks for the advice.
I am having some technical difficulties with my unipolar generator. I opted for two ferrite pot magnets (4/12 cm). On the surface of the pots there is pretty much nothing, but on the inside, between the pot and the magnet, that's where the high currents come from. I also read amperage in a drum setting (between the rims), just as Exxience did. Now the problem I am facing is that I want to get a coil inside the generator, and I have no idea how to do that. The idea is to put voltage in the coil and harvest the inductive kickback, which should synergize in theory with the unipolar induction and thus have a heightened amperage curve.
Can you post a photo or video? The homopolar generator itself is over-unity if it is built right. That is, it has to turn very fast, have strong magnetism, and low friction brushes such as liquid metal or a low-friction bearing.
@@QuantumEnergySearch it's not overunity, it's too small for that. It's powereed by a 24V motor supplied by a 12V battery thru a PWM controller. At 60% duty cycle I read numbers in excess of 50A. 50/80/even above 100 (needle past the margin of the 100A Henschen ammeter) depending on how deep I pushed the brush (manually). Last week I got 80A and 0.060V on multimeter. So it's too small to be overunity. The whole ball game is to get a coil inside. I want to see on an oscilloscope if my assumption is valid and the two inductions synergize.
You could wind a spiral coil on a plate and see if that helps.
@@jlo13800I thought about winding, I just couldn't do it. Now I am trying to do with a capacitor instead.
Ok great the homopolar generator makes a great overunity generator. i want to give a go at it.
Bruce Depalma told us at a lecture, that an 18-inch diameter N machine is a potential Generator of power, But the key is high Speed, But if considered to build a large diameter N machine, like an 5 meters diameter with slow speed @ 500 rpm, then escape velocity is reached very quickly.
Yes, that's correct. Sir T said they did a really big one for the military and it was like unlimited amps. But they did small ones too and got 200-300% efficiency. I think it's a lot better when its really big, but it's very expensive.
Could you potentially use a Conical Tesla coil in opposite polarities to bypass this problem?
I was wondering what "They" used mercury for, absolutely brilliant. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Can u explain how all this spinning and liquid metal could affect or switch of the local field (magnetic/gravitational)??
It shouldn't make a lot of difference. Don't use mercury, there are other options.
@@QuantumEnergySearch thank you, I can only presume you mean gallium, unless ununpentium or to be more respectable I should call it moscovium is readily available where u are. Thanks again 🙂. Peace.
Buenas noches a todos es muy bueno que hay personas que buscan como generar electricidad ,aún que sea no puedan comprender totalmente la física
Is overunity the PC word for perpetual motion?
No, but both terms can be to describe a free energy machine. Unity means the same amount of power out as power in, as in 100% efficient, or a COP of 1. Over-unity means more power out than in. To be an over-unity machine, technically there has to be some energy input, and once the machine is over-unity it can be closed-looped, making it perpetual motion. Perpetual motion just means it stays running (not generating any excess energy), having a COP slightly over 1 to overcome frictional losses.
@@QuantumEnergySearch what's stopping you from making one of these big enough to power your peak needs and back feeding the grid with your excess?
@@oneplaneteer1708 They are expensive to build. I've never had funds for an expensive project. Also, I don't recommend being wired into the power grid.
@@QuantumEnergySearch why shouldn't I use the power grid?
@@oneplaneteer1708 you can but the grid will probably go down permanently, soon.
I still dont get how such crazy amounts of current helps anyone if it cant be converted to needed volts. If a tiny amout of volts is being produced along with massive amps the overall power would still be watts, so why couldn't it be converted from DC to AC and then transformed into needed configuration?
Yes the voltage has to be stepped up (see my other comment.) It's better if you can get at least 12V out of your generator to start with, because the high amps creates a lot of resistance and heat and needs very big brushes, heavy wire, etc.
1600 amps at 1 volt is only 1600 watts.
That's really not as much as they are trying to make it seem.
The average toaster requires over 1000 watts to toast bread.
I suspect the motor they are using to drive the generator is using more power than they are generating.
Power is defined as voltage * current.
P=VI
High current y itself doesn't mean high power if the voltage is very low.
De-Palma's machines weren't that great. They did demonstrate over-unity. There's been better homopolar generators developed since then. Some of them are low-cost. Keep in mind the millions and billions put into battery, combustion engine, and electric motor technology, and yet none of the 3 are any good.
Nice video and presentation.
Page 1:00 diagram is a misunderstood representation of Faraday’s motor/generator also known as unipolar magnetic m/g.
It may be corrected in the following manner.
Was: B field is evenly distributed over the entire disc area, ie four quadrants.
Is : to focus the B field into one or less than one quadrant, (or use a horse shoe magnet as Michael Faraday did)
Some experimenter made the same misunderstanding and mistake have experienced millivolt output attempt to hide their ignorance in saying it only generates current but voltage and quietly slip away without defending their claim with a current meter.
In principle it generate no voltage or current.
Do it again the Michael’s way if we have second chance.
Thank you for your comments. There are different ways to build them that are higher output or more economical, and also way over-unity. The main thing is to get the speed up really high.
the question is, what are the watts in and watts out? 1 amp at 10 volts is equal to 10 amps at 1 volt. 10 watts ..... What are the parasitic losses? What is the motor load wattage?
You can build it small using neodymium magnets and use a ball bearing as a brush, you can get up to 300% efficient but there's no upper limit. This is a lot cheaper and safer than liquid metal brushes. DePalma's machines were over-unity but not that spectacular (I forget the exact numbers). If It's built small, it's economical, and at 300% or even 250% efficient it can easily be self-running. You can also run at very high speeds if it is small.
@@QuantumEnergySearch I'm just asking what are the watts in and the watts out on the model you built. Maybe make another video with your multimeter so we can see power and power. Not just volts. Not just amps. Watts.
@@QuantumEnergySearchimpossible.
@@QuantumEnergySearchimpossible.
Your house meter with the rotating disc is a " K " motor. A " N " Machine is a DC generator. A 5,5 meter N generator can drive a 5,5 meter K motor. ( Ship drive ?
I believe the Unipolar Dynamo can be made AC by simply supplying the disk with AC voltage and let the disks rotation produce the Amperage, in the analog watt hour meters the high voltage coil induces an electrostatic field onto the aluminum disk which is covered in sharp edged perforations, those magnify electrostatic accumulation and aid in the disks spin, the Current coils are unbalanced which gives the disk a rotation direction to spin as it produces the amps, the frequency you supply the disk with will be a large factor in what frequency of current the disk produces, accounting for phase shifts and all.
Spirally subdividing the disk as Tesla did would further lower the input resistance and increase the Amp output for the same speed.
@4:50 showing the homopolar motor with the spinning disc. If you make the outside magnet's having like pole's, facing each other, securring a Piezo-electric element in the center.
The repelling magnetic force acts on the piezo, compressing it causing an electric current, where you can then send it through a transformer.
If you wanted to take it a bit further scrap the magnet's and use electromagnetic coil's with variable resistor's. Experiment with it! Send some chirps ..
Learn about partnered output coils to understand their ability to multiply power through their use of asymmetry.
I was wondering where my hardwood log posts for my banisters went;)
The unipolar motor/generator is fascinating in its simplicity and a good teaching tool for understanding electromagnetics. Sadly, there is nothing phenomenal about it. It had limited commercial success in the past where high DC current was required and difficult to obtain. It is ultimately an impractical and inefficient device. Those who think it is capable of over unity operation are con men and those who don't understand the principles of operation.
the engineers of WITTS have made different versions, a 16ft version for the militiary which delivered hundreds of KW of energy. And little small 4" ones that were still 300% efficient, they were self-running. The sad thing is that there are few good engineers in the world, and even fewer who understand electricity. This is one of the few generators where you can get over-unity, but it has to be engineered really well which is the downside. But the same is true for almost every technology we use every day.
@@QuantumEnergySearch Yeah I can sniff out a scam in a heartbeat, it's so obvious WITTS is legit. I'd have a few beers with you guys anytime, especially the dude on the left... brother, Sir, Dr. Timothy is it? You guys are awesome. Here's to serving the Almighty!
High Amp, Ok!
Free energy? Nops!
If you are a good engineer you can get way over-unity with this type of generator. With every other generator, you can't (technically there are ways but it's not simple.)
High amp motor. Use as a generator.
Show just 1 that achieve over unity!
I am ready to carry out the electricity generation project with angular resonance together with investors who agree to make an official protocol. I have worked for 15 years for this project. After the official signatures are signed, everything will be done openly. 98% of the videos published on are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.
The battery motor he made was fun to watch but it didn't demonstrate anything about an n machine generator.
Pure con.
If this were possible it would already be in use everywhere. It is not.
Over unity is impossible.
how do you know that?
You are very lost on this
If overunity and free energy were impossible a "Generator" wouldn't even work in the first place:
"A time variable electric current creates an electric field parallel to that current. The field exerts an electric force on the charge in the nearby conductors thereby creating induced electric currents in them. This in the term “electromagnetic induction” is an actually a misnomer, since no magnetic effect is involved in the phenomena, and since the induced current is caused solely by the time variable electric current and by the electric field produced by that current."
"There exists a sourceless electromagnetic field whereas according to equation 528 such fields are impossible since there is no doubt that they represent a dual wave field, but as we've seen neither Maxwell's equations nor their solutions indicate the existence of causal links (no causation) between electric and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a duel entity always having electrical and magnetic components simultaneously created by their common sources; time variable electric charges and currents."
"according to these equations in time variable systems electrical and magnetic fields are always created simultaneously because they have a common causative source, the changing electrical current, once created the two fields coexist from then on without any effect upon each other. Therefore electromagnetic induction is a phenomenon in which the field creates the other, I.E energy generation is an illusion. The illusion of mutual creation arises from the facts and time-dependent systems of the two fields appearing predominantly together."
-Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields by Oleg D. Jefimenko
In laymen's terms this means there is no transduction between kinetic energy and electric energy, there never has been, Generators aren't generators, they are Manifestors.
It is not perpetual motion because you must start the motor and the bearings will fail.
So he is stating it correctly over unity.
Just to give credibility to me I worked in aerospace for years.
My only concern here is as is stated the electrolysis arcing in the bearings.
So my thought is brushes and magnetic bearings might circumvent the obstacles.
Liquid metal is the only good option because the amps are so high. The video shows two different devices, the unipolar generator and the ball-bearing motor.