0:00 - The End of End of History 1:43 - Albion's Seed 3:08 - Intro and organization 4:22 - Brief survey of the four groups 9:21 - How to write a term paper. 10:05 - The Eternal Puritan, their Moral Consensus and Ethnostate 17:23 - Patriarcha! 21:53 - Thot Patrol and Incel Rage 25:57 - HOL UP IS YOU TELLING WE WUZ ARISTOCRATS 29:10 - I'M LITERALLY QUAKING RN 30:40 - Open Borders for Pennsylvania! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) 32:18 - What are thoumst even talking about? 35:17 - The Borderer 42:39 - Back already 43:21 - Bugmanism 45:40 - THICC D'nations 46:56 - What is capitalism to Schumpeter? 49:16 - RIP Terry Davis 50:12 - Comments from the Cryptonomicon 51:53 - Back to Albion's Seed: MUH FREEDOM 1:00:27 - An Ethnic History of the United States 1:03:24 - Andrew Jackson 1:08:09 - Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War 1:11:32 - Postwar Puritan Supremacy 1:13:04 - REEEEconstruction: PURTIANS GET OUT 1:15:50 - Border Nationalism Now! 1:17:30 - [Le bad editting] Regionalism and the New Deal Coalition 1:20:10 - DR3 and the Party Inversions 1:27:37 - Non-white Immigration, Hart Celler Act 1:29:18 - Obama and Trump 1:35:55 - Finishing up Democracy
I’m English, Scottish and Irish with a bit of Indian so I suppose my family history must be mostly borderers. There are a lot of coal miners, Southern Baptist preachers, bootleggers and people who fought in wars in my ancestry.
just listened to the entire thing. Obviously, I haven't read the book, but when you were extrapolating past the 1989 mark into the Obama and Trump years, I would say you hit the nail on the head where you said now, there is a large nonwhite immigrant coalition that is it's own "cultural folkway" that represents Obama, and that Trump is the reaction to it. You mentioned all four groups coalesced into supporting trump with the immigrant coalition falling on the the other side (leftist democrats). I agree, except would say, its three of the four of cultural groups. From what you stated, as well as the one Quaker Meeting (church service) I have been to, I would say the Quaker cultural group morphed into the "subaru driving agnostic white liberals" of today. So that group of literate, academic (but not morally totalitarian and conservative like the Puritans) then when on to vote for Obama and Socialist Politics of today.
I think it's also the Puritan influence that has led to the modern Left as well. They just replaced church Puritanism with secular Progressivism for moral proselytizing.
The literate academic agnostic liberal whites are as morally totalitarian as the Puritans. In fact they are akin to warped "spiritual descendants" of the Puritans. They were once an oppressed group reactive against their conservative forebears but once in power, they are just as oppressive and totalitarian against the conservatives. Puritan form of Christianity was replaced by liberalism, " progressivism" , woke. The Puritanical ethos remained although the morality/values are diametrically opposite.
Replace Quakers with puritans and yeah. Quakers morphed into the broad middle American culture we have, while puritans have replaced Christianity with social justice as their religion while being just at devout and zealous
@Luke Smith great post. Admire your courage to distill this fine work. @15:10 on _Puritan suffering_ please don't confuse it with stoicism, because _Puritans endured suffering with joy_ . Suffering was for Christ's glory and in His power--not simply for its own sake. Contrary to a Stoic outlook, Puritan suffering was counted as joy since it would be brief compared to an eternity with Christ.
I agree with these 4 categories but of the two groups that I descend from, Borderers and Planters, you can split those into two groups. In Scotland, SW Scotland and the Borders have two different histories with a bit of overlap. The Covenanters of SW Scotland stayed Presbyterian in the States. A lot of Borderers were mixed with Northern English and were not as quick to build their society around the church. Most of them became Baptist due to traveling Baptist ministers who came looking for them and who held revivals. The Covenanters were frugal and educated. Another distinct group split from the Virginia planters are the descendants of the indentured servants. They were poor people from England who had no Cavelier/Norman connections. They had a tendency to push West and mix with the borderers in Appalachia or push South into North Carolina then Georgia and Alabama. They were more diverse, more likely to mix with people outside of their community in an attempt to survive. Many white Southerners who descend from these folks carry trace amounts of African and/or Indigenous ancestry.
The fifth major player group introduced in the twentieth century is the small hats, and FDR was their first candidate, hence the fundamental shift in the paradigm.
The small hats controlled the slave trade and the sugar cane/rum business and actually made up a decent percentage of the pirates. They had a huge influence in the south/CSAN they've been here and had a lot of influence way before the 20th century
In regards to breaking the sinful will of a child, I grew up sitting with my knees on dry corn kernels and smashed walnut shells, with my nose touching the corner of the room and hands held up high for hours
What about two religious groups that came later but have become influential? Catholics and Jewish people. They don't seem to fit here, they aren't foundational but they seem to command some power (control of the Supreme Court, important in the educational field, and in part the entertainment industry for example) and they seen themselves as different from the wasps.
A friend of mine in Wales🏴 actually said it best that, in regards to military might and overall mentality, it could be said that the U.S.🇺🇸 is the son closest to the father🇬🇧. Canada🇨🇦 is the well-behaved first born but Uncle Sam is the rebellious son more like the father in his prime (which the father hates to admit😂).
A lot of my ancestors appear to be similar to the Planters, but landed in the NE as ship captains and the forgotten sons of knights, then quickly moved west into Missouri and Kentucky where they basically assimilated with the Borderers. Others were Saxon Germans who ended up labeled Pennsylvania Dutch and also moved west to assimilate with Borderers. We ended up in Oregon. Over the last 20 years a lot of people from the NE moved to Portland. I knew what type of people they were, but now that I understand the Puritan background it makes more sense. These were people fleeing from strict families, but who still brought their Puritan culture with them. They came for our free spirited, independent, creative way of life, which they saw as hippy, and turned it into this social justice liberalism, which they also see as hippy. So now we have this weird mix of libertarian hippies and neo-liberal hippy transplants that have made the place a nightmare.
Funny commentary! I think a lot of neo-liberal/SJWs came from strict and dysfunctional/hypocritical families. For example, a lot of them had passive fathers and overbearing mothers, or no father at home and a VERY overbearing single mother. But because the psychotic mother at least claimed to represent traditional values and maybe even went to church, they grew up to blame their problems on religion/patriarchy/conservatism, when ironically, it was the lack of these things in their family that lead to the dysfunction. I can imagine the PNW was way cooler 20+ years ago.
The one instance where Borderers and Puritans were aligned was the American Revolution. They both opposed the crown. The Virginia Planters did as well, but the Deep South planters were on the side of the crown, especially in the cities. The New Yorkers also supported the crown. The Quakers were largely neutral, but the non Anglo ethnic groups in Pennsylvania largely supported the crown.
10:20- "They will usually teach that the Puritans are the origin point of all America". They're right in a way, they subdued all the other cultures through industry, education, and force of arms. Naturally the education system which they built will tell the simple version of this. There's a reason why the slang for "American" in other countries is "Yankee" . 21:00- So you're telling me the feminist fixation on "Patriarchy" is just an old Puritan vendetta against some opinionated planter aristocrat from the 18th century? I knew they were petty, but holy shit. Also Johnny Rebel refers to God as 'The Master" at one point, and so does Marty Robbins so perhaps that ideology survived for a long time in the South.
The south vs north conflict is explained in Thomas Sowell's "Black rednecks and white liberals". Its interesting to hear about ideas from this book and comparing it to Sowell's book.
The 4 volumes by Robert Caro on LBJ should be required reading, not only on how to write a presidential biography but just how Machiavellian LBJ was. Best biography ever on one of the most evil presidents ever.
It’s also worth mentioning that each of these groups were distinct populations, or what we might call “races” today. They certainly saw themselves as such, with a great deal of animosity between each, but in particular between the east and west English, puritans and planters. The puritans were Anglo-saxons, descendants of the original west Germanic and Dutch settlers/invaders that pushed the Celtic Brits into Wales. The planters are Norman French, the Quakers were a mix of Jutes and Danes, coming from the Dane law, and the Borderers were Celts mixed with Vikings, so more than a little bit crazy.
Have you read "American Nations" by Colin Woodard? He has a similar and related take that gets into even more of the regional political cultures, seems to fit quite well he's explained well how Trump won and recently took a hit in the midterms
Older generations of Mexicans, and Asian people as a whole, were strongly conservative. I wonder why that has shifted with their children and grandchildren?
The general direction of American "culture" is towards social liberalism. Social liberals and progressives are in almost total control of US academia and media. People conform to the dominant cultural values which is liberal nowadays in influential academia and media. Liberalism is painted as more reasonable and intellectually tenable than conservatism.
george lakoff and frames will give you a good insight on that, when cars and automated vehicles were a thing , people at the time "memed" that we are going to have hoverboards soon, that narrative took root and people worked on it , took a long time thats why we meme about the previous "meme's" overestimation , like we thought we would have hover boards but we have global warming and stuff like that
thot patrol and incel rage bit was very illuminating, as a Pole I never could quite put my finger on it, but there's something irritatingly dysfunctional about sex relations in the US and it's spilling over to the rest of the _western_ world
Have you considered creating a separate website where people could leave public comments and questions about various topics discussed on your channel and you could in turn respond to them?
Kinda just and intro. Read Colin Woodard’s "American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America" for a more complete picture.
One thing that I’m realizing that every one seems to forget is that borderers settled across the Inland regions of the United States. From Western New England all the way down to much of Florida. They strongly contributed to the Western New England and Western Pennsylvania dialects just as they contributed to the Inland Southern dialects. And the cultures that spread West in all of these regions was largely the Western Variety of those cultures that had been influenced by the borderers. So the borderers aren’t exclusively a Southern Group, we have Pennsylvania borderers and New England Borderers. Similar to the South, the borderers cultures gradually merged with the Eastern cultures over time and especially after the Eastern cultures spread west. But the borderer influence is still there just like it is in the South. A second thing that I noted is that you mentioned that the primary division between the Trump and Obama coalitions is race. But I think that is only partially true. Trump seems to represent a large coalition of mostly (but not entirely) White Americans who are established into the four British Groups. But Trump is largely unpopular among educated voters (many of whom are also Old Stock Americans) who live outside of the Deep South. The Obama/democratic coalition is not primarily made up of Non-White or immigrant voters. The Obama Coalition is made of largely Educated and mostly Northern White Americans who are allied with Black and immigrant voters as well sexual minorities. The educated group of Northern Whites is an important group here as they still define many of the core values of the Democratic Party and many of them are Old Stock Americans just like those in the trump coalition.
My interpretation is that the old stock puritans stopped practicing christianity, but are still the same deeply religious people. They just worship social justice and other marxist descended religions
Im curious about the movement of germans to america, since that seems to be equal to or even greater than british ethnicity. Also, if the episcopalians are planters, how do they later become yankee wasps?
@@aaronbliss7192 germans were actually present in america for about as long as the Quakers were and ccx only grew further in influence and admixture as time went on. Eventually though, the germans ended up becoming indistinguishable from Anglos because A) they had common religious ground enough that they could just intermarry at will and B) they were very diverse in terms of economic range which meant that German bankers, craftsmen and farmers would eventually just congregate with Anglo bankers, craftsmen and farmers rather than each other. This meant that unless a bunch of germans settled together in an insular or otherwise socially distinct culture (like Amish, Mennonites and the Lubbock County germans), they would simply absorb themselves into the surrounding culture and integrate. The book Beyond the Melting Pot explains this process in detail towards its conclusion.
@@joker-0723 in the southern colonys and Appalachia I've done a lot of genealogy very few German surnames before 1800. I can't say for the north.but it's true scotch Irish and english dominate before then.
@@aaronbliss7192 German immigration largely centered itself on the North and the midwest from what I remember for numerous reasons particularly with Quakers being more pliable to accepting outsiders and the midwest being useful farmland. Any protestant could make their way to Philadelphia and coexist there if they weren't somehow unruly.
@@joker-0723 Exactly. Spot on. My ancestors on my mom's side were either French Protestant or German Protestant from Alsace-Lorraine (records were bad and due to assimilation who knows if great meemaw spoke French or German, some of them probably spoke both.) and nowadays my mom is entirely indistinguishable from a WASP. These ancestors moved to the border gradient of the upper and lower Midwest, learned English and forgot their native tongue in a couple generations, and culturally mixed with other English speaking white Protestants in the area who had the same or very similar attitudes, foods, games, idioms, et cetera. Once the language barriers weakened, it took no time at all for intermarriage and growing up going to the same schools to make them indistinguishable. I think the same thing is beginning to happen more broadly across American society, of course not nationally, just that every locality is becoming more integrated. I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago as an older Zoomer and I had several friends that it sounds funny to call "multiracial" and/or "multiethnic" because the concept of race and ethnicity starts to break down when you're a "mix" of so many and your daily cultural life is indistinguishable from a white European mutt like me (my dad's side is southern and eastern European). I just hope people can add their cultural traditions to the melting pot successfully instead of losing them and becoming traditionless blobs. My Romanian family members for example really lost all their traditional Romanian cuisine, and Romanians were never enough of a cultural force for any Romanian dishes to go mainstream like German-American or Italian-American ones did. I think we can retain our heritage without necessarily remaining distinct ethnic groups, it just means we take on the heritage of others and give some of our own. Maybe the melting pot will become increasingly real over time.
Thank you for this video. Sorry I am just now watching this, but I just finished this book and think it is one of the greatest on immigration and American History. I'm going to check out your other reviews, they are really good.
I finished late and was going to release it tomorrow morning, but I was antsy and couldn't get to sleep so I just uploaded it now so I can got to bed ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Now I need to check out this book to see how Italians fit in this. Catholic, non-North European, and ghettoized for a good while before integrating. Ethno-nationalists swear Italians fitted perfectly and smoothly into the social fabric of America, immigrants with a South European heritage that happen to come from Latrine America are supposed to be a whole different case.
I never heard a ethno-nationalist who said italians fitted perfectly well in the beginning. The largest lynching in American History was of Italians (in the south which is surprising), Italians did however in a few decades fit smoothly in white america
@K F a lot of them have integrated to varying degrees around the country. They might not be a part of the traditional culture in the same extent as Dixie or new England but as an accepted and normal group of the wider fabric of American culture and within the scope of middle America as pioneered by the Quakers, they have long now been woven into American society.
Considering how discriminated Catholics were and how literally no one had any sympathy towards them both the Irish and Italians did pretty well. Now they are seeing as traitors by progressives because they didn't make things easy for black people ( all of these groups were desperately poor and competing for the same jobs). I see something like this happening with Latinos.
Methodism is dead. At least there’s still spirited debate in the SBC; but things look to be going in the wrong direction. I’ll have to listen to Al Mohler this coming week.
Read this book and realized I had ALL the cultures in my ancestry--indentured servants (but thank the gods, not slaveowning planters), wild backwoods Scots-Irish, a few Quakers, but at least 80% uber-Puritans . . . and let's not forget there were smatterings of Dutch and Huguenot intermarried with those Puritans. Anything, as long as it wasn't (horrors) Catholic.
1:36 "Normal" languages?! You mean INDO-EUROPEAN languages. And for Quakers, the use only of "thou" is a mark of their being a "brotherhood" in which all are equal before God (no class distinctions). And for that matter, as I remember from fourth grade, it was the SWEDISH settlers in Delaware in the 1630s, not the much later Scots-Irish, who introduced the log cabin. This is typical of the education level of the narrator. I've read sixth-grade term papers with more sophisticated language, and historical sophistication. The book itself is a classic, and doesn't need to be read all at one go--you can read sections as desired. As for the picture/cartoonish parody of "The Cholmondeley Ladies," I don't know why Donald Trump is in it, since his family is 20thc immigrants from Scotland and Germany.
The people that ruled Albion we're associated with the Giants of the Bible. The word giant does not necessarily mean someone of large size but someone of supernatural intelligence and strength and they are extremely wicked. When Brutus invaded Albion he kicked out the Giants who I believe moved into Scandinavia. I believe the people that moved into Albion later to be call it Britain were the Israelites. Europe was the promised land of the Israelites for a thousand years of peace after the Messiah was born and set them free and then after that thousand years of Peace ended in 1066 Magog came back from their northern prison in Scandinavia to take back their land and enslave the Israelites of Europe and then spread their lawless democracy on the rest of the world.
@@TheSpecialJ11 He's actually correct, the last giant of Britain was called Gogmagog. The Israelites came to Britain and are the true brits. Today, they are known as the Welsh, but the real name is the Cymru. There were various King Arthurs who are part of this line. You can even read Egyptian Hyroglyphs using the Welsh language. The current monarchy have supressed this.
They're basically an IRL munchkin faction. Super cohesive, crazy high birth rates, very industrious and well-educated. Their only weaknesses Fischer described was unquestioning deference to the elderly (even if demented) and not being very charming people.
@@ingold1470 I think Puritans are the source of American moral panic. The belief that you will be posses by a demon through rock and roll or video games or the prohibition. But additionally, I think the moral panic of modern sjw is the same type of Puritan thinking. Need to cleanse language, culture and behavior, to prevent people getting possesed by evil.
@@Mbeluba It's the descendants of the same people doing it, and Puritan-founded universities like Harvard and Yale are propagating it so it's not too much of a stretch. People compare "whiteness" to Catholic original sin, but it's more like Calvinist Total Depravity. It's like Marcuse & friends came into Yankeeland right when original Puritanism was on the way out, and gave them a new way to channel the old impulses.
@@Mbeluba I think the divide among progressives in SJW vs not SJW is a puritan vs quaker divide. Thanks to the internet and other forms of communication that transcend geography, different values have been able to spread broadly in the country and among individual members of otherwise disparate ethnic groups. I believe this has lead to a lot of young urban people splitting along these old ideological lines that used to be much more regionally and class divided. The same can be said of the spread of borderer values into the rural north and spread of planter values among puritan industrialists (or at least their descendants.)
Albion was Doggerland a large landmass ,land which is the British Isles a land of Celts which sunk underneath the ocean home of the black Irish a an extinct Britannic tribe of Celts who who looked south European ,Latin ,Hellenic ,Illyrian, Thracian then Nordic ,Germanic or Celtic who came from the Mediterranean sea basin from the Iberian peninsula in the western Pyrenees mountains in Pyrenees mountains with Celtic blood from the Celtic homeland who spoke a Celtic Britannic language now extinct who were cousins to extinct Celts ,Gaunches, CeltoIberians ,Tocharians, Germanics ,Nordics, basques, Catalans who came from the Celtic homeland and Indo-European homeland .
cool book. the borderers bit sounded a bit head-scratchy. i might skim through some of those chapters. i'm still not going to church luke. i swear to god if your reading list ends up being full-on reactionary i know like 3 other guys on youtube that post /g/ memes
Where did the ideologies of White, Imported Christians to North America come from? J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc *El Kana ( אל קנא)* is the name of God found in the Bible. In the Ten Commandments, God declares that he is El-kana Exodus 20:5, Deuteronomy 5:9 Moses calls God El kana (yhwh qana shemu *el-qana* hewa) Exodus 34:14 YHVH identifies Himself as El Kana. Deut 4:24, 5:9; 6:15; 1 Kings 19:10, 14 *The name El-kana consists of two elements:* *EL (אל),* the prominent Canaanite deity whose name became applied to the God of israEL. *Kana (קנא),* which forms Kannan, the Tamil Hindu name for Krishna; Kannan is also the source of the name Canaan, named after Cain, the avenging priest, the spear; Canaan is the promised land of milk and honey, favorite foods of Hindus since the Vedas. There are "Hindu deities" throughout the Old Testament, such as Arjuna, Bala, Kali, Ramah, Uma. There are numerous Hindu names, Isaiah and Isaac, containing the Isa root. Isa is a name of Shiva and Oshea, or Hosea, is a transliteration of Osseo, another name of Shiva. *For in the seventh day God ended his work which he had made, and on the seventh day he rested from all his work, which he had made.* SHIVA is the Lord of the Sabbath, which has its roots Sheba meaning seven (7). see: Shaba, Saba, Tsaba, Seba, Sheba, Shebah, Shibah SHIBAH, means Seven in Genesis 32-33 *Genesis **26:33* The Well, the City, and ISAac have been named after SHIVA, as the root of ISAac means SHIVA. Genesis 28:22 This stone pillar (matSEBA) shall be God’s house. Gen 31:45 Jacob erects the stone pillar (matSEBA). *Judaism is taught at the yeSHIVA.* J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc teaches hate, slavery, animism, penis worship, and the diet of carnivorism.
What are you talking about. El/Ill/Yll or Hell/Hyll/Hill - Star.. Kan - They have. Kanun/Kanon/Kanyn - (notice how the vowel can change). Kan - They have un/on/yn/en/el/ell/yll - (notice how the n converts into L or LL) Star. "They Have a Star". Moses, Mesus, Mason. Ma - He/She/It/They are. Ses/Sus/Son(Za/Ze/Zen/Zan/Zeu/Zeri/Zani/Zeus - Sound/Voice/Teacher. "He Is Sound/Voice/Teacher. Get lost with your bs.
@@kapelbaza6130 EL Kana ( אל קנא) is the name of God found in the Bible. Judaism is taught at the yeSHIVA. J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc. teaches hate, slavery, animism, penis worship, and the diet of carnivorism. The Hindu Bindi or Tilaka, the mark on the forehead was worn by the original J E Ws and Christians. The Bindi can be found in the story of Moses and the Israelite's fleeing Egypt, and by the elect in Ezekiel who describes in great detail marking the forehead, and by the elect and saved in Revelations. Revelation 7:3 Those who have God's mark, or sign (His Sabbath), in their foreheads. Exodus 13:16 it will be a sign on your hand and a symbol on your forehead The bindi is also seen twice in the Book of Ezekiel, in the 9th and 16th chapters. Ezekiel 9:4-6 A wrath-filled God, observing the holocaust of animal sacrifice, the abominations of Jerusalem, tells his helpers to put the bindi on the foreheads of those who are against the abominations in the Temple of Jerusalem. One man among them was clothed with linen, with a writer’s ink-horn by his side. God says: "Go through Jerusalem, and put a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed in it." And to the others he said in my hearing, "Pass through the city after him, and smite; your eye shall not spare, and you shall show no pity; slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women, but touch no one upon whom is the mark. And begin at my sanctuary." In the above scriptures those who have compassion, those who sigh and groan over all the abominations committed in Jerusalem -- location of the Temple and its animal sacrifices -- have a mark put upon their foreheads. This is Ezekiel's way of describing J e wdaism identification with the Hindu, Buddhist tradition. We see John of Patmos attempting making the same link with the bindi in the "Book of Revelations." The Bindi in Revelations is the mark of the blessed and the saved, which is mentioned numerous times, in this work where there is no more sorrow and death, and therefore no longer any animal sacrifices. Moreover in Revelations the creatures above, on and beneath the earth all praise the Creator. Now that there is nothing accursed, i.e. that will be oppressed, enslaved and killed, sacrificed, no animal's life is threatened. The brutal demonic morals of the false scriptures, the Pentateuch of Jewdaism is at an end. Revelations 7:3 Do not harm the earth or the sea or the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God upon their foreheads. Revelations 9:4 And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree: but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads. Revelations 14:1 Then I looked, and lo, on Mount Zion stood the Lamb, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand who had his name and his Father's name written on their foreheads. Revelations 22:3-5 There shall no more be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and his servants shall worship him; they shall see his face, and his name shall be on their foreheads. And night shall be no more; they need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they shall reign for ever and ever. The mark on the forehead is not the only clear demonstration of the Hindu origins of the pure remnant of J e wdaism in Revelations. The rider on the white horse in Revelations is derived from the Hindu Prophecy, wherein Krishna will return as Kalki on a white horse to help remove dEVIL from Earth. Christians of course, after all the re-writes designate the rider as Jesus Christ.
@@Lawiah0 dude stop reciting books. Can you explain the words? Can you use morphology to break them down. What indoctrination idiot. You mean the church has you brain washed. Indians say they are arians. Ar - Gold. Ian - They are. "They're Gold" . I'm talking about the ultimate code which is language. Explain stuff to me linguistically. I'm not interested in anything else
@Lee Smith Your disassociation is duly noted. ... WHO INVENTED THE SPACE ENTERPRISE? It was the Roman Judaeo-Freemasonry Vatican (Jesuits) who published Heliocentricism (a corporation that has fooled billions of people) as the next centuries ticked by these science fiction stories began entering the major Universities (all faith based); from this point on the people were taught to replace Faith (pretend) with Theory (pretend). ... 1543 - Jesuits invent Theory Heliocentricism 1582 - Jesuits invent Heliocentric calendar (Pope Gregorian calendar) 1651 - Jesuits invent Moon features (Selenography) 1658 - Jesuits invent Theory of Germ disease (see Virus) 1763 - Jesuits invent Theory Atomic Energy 1809 - Jesuits invent Theory Transmutation of Species (see Theory of Evolution) 1923 - Jesuits invent Theory Missing Link (bones lost molds prove find) 1931 - Jesuits invent Theory Big Bang (another ejaculation into the virgin source) ... Lets recap - Roman Judaeo-Freemasonry sell two (2) products: 1. HEAVEN, Faith (pretend) 2. SPACE, Theory (pretend) ... i58.servimg.com/u/f58/19/39/28/69/blue_m11.jpg
Can't judge this book without reading it, but in giving an ethnoreligious history of America its hilarious that Catholics, notably Irish, Italian and Central European Catholics, get completely written out. No mention of JFK, Biden, local Chicago, NY, or Boston politics. It'd be near impossible to understand 19th century American politics without touching on this let alone what's come to pass since.
@@steve19811 mmhmm so you're a modern day Know Nothing-er huh? Luckily for you you're not a back in the day Know Nothing-er. I doubt they would've let you around the clubhouse other than to clean it Herr Beisheim
They're outside the scope of this study. The book focuses solely on Anglo immigration of the 17th-18th centuries, their folkways and their influence on the 13 colonies and early United States, and the imprint they left on the regions they settled. The author does make an assertion that subsequent immigrants largely assimilated to/picked-up their local regional folkways, and gives examples like JFK's prim-and-proper New England manners and education, and Barry Goldwater's western style of dress and libertarian beliefs.
I think there is a little confusion here, while I agree the term ''scots irish'' is inaccurate as the term was only created in the 19th century by the know nothing movement in order to justify discrimination against the Catholic Irish, the reality is most of the ''borders'' had no English or Scottish ancestry to speak of. In the records they only ever refer to themselves as Irish and most of the Celtic culture they brought to America was derived from Irish culture. All public documents of the day, immigration lists, newspapers, etc. invariably refer to those colonists as “Irish”; that they called themselves “Irish” in America called them “Irish” and in many places ostracized them as such; that they called their settlements by Irish names; that they founded societies which they called “Irish” and celebrated the national festival of Ireland. Today you can still see strong connections between the music, dance and way they speak which is remarkably similar to nearly every corner of Ireland. Historian Micheal J O'brein actually painstakingly went through thousands of news paper clippings, muster rolls ect and found that the majority also bore quintessentially Irish surnames, this doesn't include all the possible anglicized Irish surnames.archive.org/details/hiddenphaseofame00obri/page/134 In the United States in 1790 about 400,000 people of Irish birth or descent-about half were from an Ulster background, and the others from the three remaining provinces of Ireland. Blessing, Patrick J. (1980). "Irish". In Thernstrom, Stephan (ed.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 528. Again these people where Irish in every sense of the word and would have identified as Irish and were heavily intermixed with the native Irish if not completely native Irish. The majority of Irish Americans today are actually descended from Irish colonial immigrants and are mostly protestant, they don't identity as ''Scots Irish'' just simply Irish. www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rac.2006.16.1.25?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Dude that’s just incorrect, the Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots are not Catholic Irish; they came from the Anglo-Scottish border, lowland/southern Scotland, and northern England (particularly Northumberland and Cumberland). In fact the Jackson line of President Andrew Jackson, originated in the East Riding of Yorkshire, England. The non-Ulster-Scots “Irish” in colonial America, were mostly English in origin; they were Protestant Anglicans by and large. The colonial Fitzsimons family for example, was of Anglo-Norman extraction, with possible origins in Herefordshire. The basketball legend Larry Bird is another example. His “Irish” side (like Henry Ford’s “Irish” side) is actually Anglo-Irish. The Anglo-Irish are the descendants of Protestant English planters, who settled Ireland beginning in the 17th century. This “New English” population, would spawn an intellectual and educated upper class within the country, a class that would produce men such as William Butler Yeats, Jonathan Swift, Oscar Wilde, and Samuel Beckett. The Ulster-Scots/Scotch-Irish in the US, had a general dislike for the newly arrived Catholic Irish immigrants; so much so that the term “Scots-Irish” came about, as a way for these people to distinguishing themselves from the new arrivals. They are not the same people, just like an Irishman saying he’s “English” because he was born in England to Irish parents, isn’t English, case and point Charles Altamont Doyle, father of author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The Scots-Irish literally spoke Scots English, which is linguistically derived from Anglic English, the language spoken by the Angles of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Northumbria. Moreover, in relation to the ethnic breakdown of the Scots-Irish, I give reference to the White River Valley Historical Quarterly, Volume 4, Number 4, November 1971: “In order to clarify this paradox in the "Scotch-Irish" terminology, we shall have to go back to the old Whitehall Palace in London, on a day in September 1607, only four months after the English had planted the first permanent colony in America. King James I was disturbed by reports of further turbulence in his unruly Irish dominion. He decided to act on a proposal by Sir Arthur Chichester, Lord Deputy of Ireland, to repeople the island with Protestants. That was the beginning of the Ulster Plantation. What then formed nine counties of Northern Ireland (now six counties) was actually re-peopled in the 17th century with Protestants from Northern England and the Lowlands of Scotland. The proportion was roughly four Scots to one Englishman. They largely displaced what Macaulay referred to as the "aboriginal Irish," who were almost wholly Catholic. The Scots were Presbyterians and the English Anglicans with some dissenting creeds.” Warwickshire-born folklorist Cecil Sharp, spent months observing the culture of the Appalachian highlands, and after a careful study of the traditional songs, ballads, dances, and singing-games that he saw there, he concluded that they had their origins in that part of England ‘where the civilization was least developed - probably the North of England, or the Border country between Scotland and England.’ Dan Jackson-author of “The Northumbrians: The North-East of England and Its People, A New History” (Hurst, 2019)-penned an article entitled “How Northern England Made the Southern United States,” and in it, he had this to say about the Scotch-Irish: “The durability of that Border culture among these settlers was striking. First, American backcountry speech was descended directly from the language spoken by Northumbrians, Cumbrians and the Scots Borderers during the 17th and early 18th century. For example, the use of ‘man’ was - and is - commonly used in Cumberland and Northumberland by a wife to refer to her husband, as in the Tammy Wynette classic ‘Stand by Your Man’. Similarly ‘honey’ as a term of endearment was transplanted from north Britain (and lives on in Northumbrian speech as ‘hinny’), as well as ‘let on’ for tell, ‘nigh’ for near and ‘lowp’ for jump. The distinctive pronunciation of Appalachian and southern US speech too had its roots in north Britain: with ‘sartin’ for certain, ‘deef’ for deaf and ‘widder’ for widow. The place names of this region also spoke of northern English roots. In North Carolina alone, there is a Durham Branch, several Durham Creeks, Durham County and Durham Township as well as the city of Durham (and the port most of these borderers landed in was Newcastle on the Delaware river). In Pennsylvania there are the counties of Westmoreland and Northumberland, as well as the dozens of places named after Cumberland - either the northern English county, or the ‘Butcher’ scourge of the Jacobites. There’s an Orange County in Virginia, too, and one explanation for the origin of the term ‘Hillbillies’ is that it derived from the backsettlers’ loyalty to William III.” Some Scotch-Irish families descend from indigenous Irish families who converted to Protestantism, while other families are descended from Manx, Welsh, and southern/southeastern English families (some of them being Baptists). An even smaller minority of Scotch-Irish descend from Calvinist German Palatines, French Huguenots, Walloons and/or Flemings. Davy Crockett for example, was patrilineally descended from French Huguenots. However, the vast majority of Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots, descend from Anglican/Presbyterian sects of northern Englishmen and southern Scotsmen. We can actually trace the origins of Ulster-Scot families (like the Jackson line) back to southern Scotland and northern England. It’s not made up nonsense.
@@thenextshenanigantownandth4393 “the reality is most of the ‘borders’ had no English or Scottish ancestry to speak of.” Yeah that’s completely and utterly false. They were different from the indigenous Irish; the Ulster-Scots/Scots-Irish are derived from the Angles of Northumbria (the Norse too, though their influence is harder to discern because of how similar the Angles and Danes were to each other), the Gaelic Scots, and the Britons of Strathclyde.
@@JBroughton2 Claim it's false yet have provided no evidence to support this old chest nut myth. Records don't support this old myth cooked up by the know nothing movement and the scots Irish societies.
@@thenextshenanigantownandth4393 not an argument, I gave you 9 paragraphs worth of evidence. The Jackson line goes back to Yorkshire, the Nixon line goes back to the Scottish/English Borderlands. The Ulster-Scots speak a language that is heavily derived linguistically from Scots, a Northumbrian, Anglic dialect. The areas they settled in the US, have place names like “Durham,” “Cumberland,” “Northumberland,” and “Westmoreland.” Fact is America was founded by Protestant Anglos. The aboriginal Irish only came in great numbers much later in the 1840s, to the great detriment of the US. Most of the Irish upper class and educated class, were of Anglo-Scottish origins, going back to the Anglo-Norman invasion. Jonathan Swift, Robert Boyle, George Berkeley, William Rowan Hamilton, Oscar Wilde, Samuel Beckett, CS Lewis, WB Yeats, all descended from the second wave of “New English” settlers, also known as the Anglo-Irish. You also seem to ignore the fact that Scotland has an extreme Gaelic influence, which historically stretches all the way back to the end of Roman Britain, and to the beginnings of Anglo-Saxon Britain. The Scots were Gaelic speakers, and by the 10th century, Gaelic had become the dominant language throughout northern and western Scotland, absorbing or displacing the Brythonic speakers of Scotland, such as the Picts, and the Cumbrians. So of course there is going to be a good amount of crossover with Ireland linguistically. There are many surnames/names of Gaelic origin in Scotland, such as McCormick, MacDonald, and Kennedy; that doesn’t mean the Scottish are really “Irish.” This also applies to Scottish names of Germanic origin, since both the Vikings and Anglo-Saxons (specifically the Angles and possibly the “Frisians”) settled Scotland, which again, doesn’t mean the Scottish are really “Danish,” “Norwegian,” “Frisian,” or “English.”
I wouldn't put any stock in any of this nonsense. Im a big fan of at least 10 of your videos so far and will watch more but this is factually inaccurate and very american.
0:00 - The End of End of History
1:43 - Albion's Seed
3:08 - Intro and organization
4:22 - Brief survey of the four groups
9:21 - How to write a term paper.
10:05 - The Eternal Puritan, their Moral Consensus and Ethnostate
17:23 - Patriarcha!
21:53 - Thot Patrol and Incel Rage
25:57 - HOL UP IS YOU TELLING WE WUZ ARISTOCRATS
29:10 - I'M LITERALLY QUAKING RN
30:40 - Open Borders for Pennsylvania! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
32:18 - What are thoumst even talking about?
35:17 - The Borderer
42:39 - Back already
43:21 - Bugmanism
45:40 - THICC D'nations
46:56 - What is capitalism to Schumpeter?
49:16 - RIP Terry Davis
50:12 - Comments from the Cryptonomicon
51:53 - Back to Albion's Seed: MUH FREEDOM
1:00:27 - An Ethnic History of the United States
1:03:24 - Andrew Jackson
1:08:09 - Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War
1:11:32 - Postwar Puritan Supremacy
1:13:04 - REEEEconstruction: PURTIANS GET OUT
1:15:50 - Border Nationalism Now!
1:17:30 - [Le bad editting] Regionalism and the New Deal Coalition
1:20:10 - DR3 and the Party Inversions
1:27:37 - Non-white Immigration, Hart Celler Act
1:29:18 - Obama and Trump
1:35:55 - Finishing up Democracy
Interesting. Gave me a whole new perspective on American history.
Excellent analysis Luke. Hope you get a zillion subscribers bro.
good stuff. Especially for europeans like me who know not that much about american history.
I’m English, Scottish and Irish with a bit of Indian so I suppose my family history must be mostly borderers. There are a lot of coal miners, Southern Baptist preachers, bootleggers and people who fought in wars in my ancestry.
Indian🎉
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@@GenericUsername1388 Native American Indian sorry
I come from a wealthy Virginian family and listening to this video I realized I was born raised in Planter culture. Really interesting listen.
All Yaqubs creation!!!!
May he be cursed by the Black Yahweh!
@@Mbeluba not Yahweh, the sun going to tap that azz as we move closer!!!
Hold ya horses..the ancient English were actually Berbers... Read Ancient and Modern Britons...by David MacRitchie...
Who cares, there’s more to life than race buddy
Apparently, I'm the only big-brained person here who knows of Yaqubs mischievous evil.
Great content luke, keep it up with these podcasts
just listened to the entire thing. Obviously, I haven't read the book, but when you were extrapolating past the 1989 mark into the Obama and Trump years, I would say you hit the nail on the head where you said now, there is a large nonwhite immigrant coalition that is it's own "cultural folkway" that represents Obama, and that Trump is the reaction to it. You mentioned all four groups coalesced into supporting trump with the immigrant coalition falling on the the other side (leftist democrats).
I agree, except would say, its three of the four of cultural groups.
From what you stated, as well as the one Quaker Meeting (church service) I have been to, I would say the Quaker cultural group morphed into the "subaru driving agnostic white liberals" of today. So that group of literate, academic (but not morally totalitarian and conservative like the Puritans) then when on to vote for Obama and Socialist Politics of today.
excellent commentary
I think it's also the Puritan influence that has led to the modern Left as well. They just replaced church Puritanism with secular Progressivism for moral proselytizing.
The literate academic agnostic liberal whites are as morally totalitarian as the Puritans.
In fact they are akin to warped "spiritual descendants" of the Puritans. They were once an oppressed group reactive against their conservative forebears but once in power, they are just as oppressive and totalitarian against the conservatives. Puritan form of Christianity was replaced by liberalism, " progressivism" , woke. The Puritanical ethos remained although the morality/values are diametrically opposite.
@@catsnchords agree with you.
Replace Quakers with puritans and yeah. Quakers morphed into the broad middle American culture we have, while puritans have replaced Christianity with social justice as their religion while being just at devout and zealous
The Chad William Byrd II vs The Virgin Indentured Servant .
@Luke Smith great post. Admire your courage to distill this fine work. @15:10 on _Puritan suffering_ please don't confuse it with stoicism, because _Puritans endured suffering with joy_ . Suffering was for Christ's glory and in His power--not simply for its own sake. Contrary to a Stoic outlook, Puritan suffering was counted as joy since it would be brief compared to an eternity with Christ.
I wouldn't characterize Stoicism that way; suffering was not endured for its own sake, but because it was necessary.
@@duncanw9901 In the words of the warrior poet Tony Soprano: "What you gon do? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
Albion's Sneed
Powerful.
I don't get it.
Yuo will... @@edmundironside9435
@@edmundironside9435 formerly Chuck's
"Roosevelt ruled america"
"The Roosevelt regime"
I see what you're doing there
25:57 Straight Outta Virginia by Aristocrats With Attitude.
This is one of Thomas Sowell's favorite books.
I agree with these 4 categories but of the two groups that I descend from, Borderers and Planters, you can split those into two groups. In Scotland, SW Scotland and the Borders have two different histories with a bit of overlap. The Covenanters of SW Scotland stayed Presbyterian in the States. A lot of Borderers were mixed with Northern English and were not as quick to build their society around the church. Most of them became Baptist due to traveling Baptist ministers who came looking for them and who held revivals. The Covenanters were frugal and educated. Another distinct group split from the Virginia planters are the descendants of the indentured servants. They were poor people from England who had no Cavelier/Norman connections. They had a tendency to push West and mix with the borderers in Appalachia or push South into North Carolina then Georgia and Alabama. They were more diverse, more likely to mix with people outside of their community in an attempt to survive. Many white Southerners who descend from these folks carry trace amounts of African and/or Indigenous ancestry.
Borderers: "Hillbillys" Quakers: "Goody Goodys" Puritans: "Squares" Planters: "Lazy Frat Boys"
Craving Quaker Outs after so much watching. Mm, Oatmeal.
What do you do with the Ins?
Would love an episode about the Quaker Grindset
The fifth major player group introduced in the twentieth century is the small hats, and FDR was their first candidate, hence the fundamental shift in the paradigm.
The small hats controlled the slave trade and the sugar cane/rum business and actually made up a decent percentage of the pirates. They had a huge influence in the south/CSAN
they've been here and had a lot of influence way before the 20th century
Only part way through, but this is absolutely fascinating. This is definitely a book I need to get and read immediately.
Would make a great Civ mod
Whites and Europeans have an interesting political future ahead
Agree
future?
we’re realizing the way we’ve been subverted, not to fedpost but the solution will not be political but physical
european = white your not european if your not white
In regards to breaking the sinful will of a child, I grew up sitting with my knees on dry corn kernels and smashed walnut shells, with my nose touching the corner of the room and hands held up high for hours
What about two religious groups that came later but have become influential? Catholics and Jewish people. They don't seem to fit here, they aren't foundational but they seem to command some power (control of the Supreme Court, important in the educational field, and in part the entertainment industry for example) and they seen themselves as different from the wasps.
I think this is more of an ethnography of American Founding and not the whole of American History.
A friend of mine in Wales🏴 actually said it best that, in regards to military might and overall mentality, it could be said that the U.S.🇺🇸 is the son closest to the father🇬🇧. Canada🇨🇦 is the well-behaved first born but Uncle Sam is the rebellious son more like the father in his prime (which the father hates to admit😂).
A lot of my ancestors appear to be similar to the Planters, but landed in the NE as ship captains and the forgotten sons of knights, then quickly moved west into Missouri and Kentucky where they basically assimilated with the Borderers. Others were Saxon Germans who ended up labeled Pennsylvania Dutch and also moved west to assimilate with Borderers. We ended up in Oregon. Over the last 20 years a lot of people from the NE moved to Portland. I knew what type of people they were, but now that I understand the Puritan background it makes more sense. These were people fleeing from strict families, but who still brought their Puritan culture with them. They came for our free spirited, independent, creative way of life, which they saw as hippy, and turned it into this social justice liberalism, which they also see as hippy. So now we have this weird mix of libertarian hippies and neo-liberal hippy transplants that have made the place a nightmare.
Funny commentary! I think a lot of neo-liberal/SJWs came from strict and dysfunctional/hypocritical families. For example, a lot of them had passive fathers and overbearing mothers, or no father at home and a VERY overbearing single mother. But because the psychotic mother at least claimed to represent traditional values and maybe even went to church, they grew up to blame their problems on religion/patriarchy/conservatism, when ironically, it was the lack of these things in their family that lead to the dysfunction. I can imagine the PNW was way cooler 20+ years ago.
dl crew checking in. Really enjoying the series, Luke. Thanks.
32:06 "maniga". Mah nigga?
The one instance where Borderers and Puritans were aligned was the American Revolution. They both opposed the crown. The Virginia Planters did as well, but the Deep South planters were on the side of the crown, especially in the cities. The New Yorkers also supported the crown. The Quakers were largely neutral, but the non Anglo ethnic groups in Pennsylvania largely supported the crown.
10:20- "They will usually teach that the Puritans are the origin point of all America". They're right in a way, they subdued all the other cultures through industry, education, and force of arms. Naturally the education system which they built will tell the simple version of this. There's a reason why the slang for "American" in other countries is "Yankee" .
21:00- So you're telling me the feminist fixation on "Patriarchy" is just an old Puritan vendetta against some opinionated planter aristocrat from the 18th century? I knew they were petty, but holy shit. Also Johnny Rebel refers to God as 'The Master" at one point, and so does Marty Robbins so perhaps that ideology survived for a long time in the South.
The south vs north conflict is explained in Thomas Sowell's "Black rednecks and white liberals". Its interesting to hear about ideas from this book and comparing it to Sowell's book.
Oliver Cromwell and his ideological descendants have been a disaster for the human race.
The 4 volumes by Robert Caro on LBJ should be required reading, not only on how to write a presidential biography but just how Machiavellian LBJ was. Best biography ever on one of the most evil presidents ever.
Yeah.. he looks evil too.....
my ancestors belonged to 3 of the groups.
I’m 80% English 20% Irish and my ancestors settled in Tennessee but came to Oklahoma during the land rush. Thanks for uploading this video.
Where are you getting this percentage from? Irish in what way? was your hunting hound Irish?
The Magnificent Creep AncestryDNA
@@friedtaters2856 Ancestry DNA isn't accurate I would say you're pretty much just English.
@@thenextshenanigantownandth4393 I'd say that there is a good chance you are not.
@@organenthusiast5803 Oh you dont say.
This is one of the greatest things I've ever listened to. Gotta get this book!
It’s also worth mentioning that each of these groups were distinct populations, or what we might call “races” today. They certainly saw themselves as such, with a great deal of animosity between each, but in particular between the east and west English, puritans and planters. The puritans were Anglo-saxons, descendants of the original west Germanic and Dutch settlers/invaders that pushed the Celtic Brits into Wales. The planters are Norman French, the Quakers were a mix of Jutes and Danes, coming from the Dane law, and the Borderers were Celts mixed with Vikings, so more than a little bit crazy.
How? The Jutes settled in Kent, whereas the Quakers were from northern England.
This channel is a goldmine
That was a great use of time otherwise wasted here on this platform.
Family has been here since mid 1600's
England & Northwestern Europe 69%
Sweden & Denmark 16%
Ireland 11%
Norway 2%
Wales 1%
Scotland 1%
where do most live in use?
@@steve19811 East Coast
Thank you for this extremely clear and excellent summary of the ideas.
Have you read "American Nations" by Colin Woodard?
He has a similar and related take that gets into even more of the regional political cultures, seems to fit quite well he's explained well how Trump won and recently took a hit in the midterms
Justin Hadley I also was wondering if Luke has read this
Ulster Scots
Older generations of Mexicans, and Asian people as a whole, were strongly conservative. I wonder why that has shifted with their children and grandchildren?
They are nationalistic only within their borders. Not so when living in another nation.
The general direction of American "culture" is towards social liberalism. Social liberals and progressives are in almost total control of US academia and media. People conform to the dominant cultural values which is liberal nowadays in influential academia and media. Liberalism is painted as more reasonable and intellectually tenable than conservatism.
Why are the memes on point every time?
george lakoff and frames will give you a good insight on that, when cars and automated vehicles were a thing , people at the time "memed" that we are going to have hoverboards soon, that narrative took root and people worked on it , took a long time thats why we meme about the previous "meme's" overestimation , like we thought we would have hover boards but we have global warming and stuff like that
PODCAST!!!
You didn't mention the Cavaliers. Are you using "Planters" synonymously with the Cavaliers?
Cavalier is another word for royalists in the english civil war, so yea those are the same people as far as I know
thot patrol and incel rage bit was very illuminating, as a Pole I never could quite put my finger on it, but there's something irritatingly dysfunctional about sex relations in the US and it's spilling over to the rest of the _western_ world
Have you considered creating a separate website where people could leave public comments and questions about various topics discussed on your channel and you could in turn respond to them?
Do you mean something like the 2nd link in the descriptions?
At this point why would you still want to bring back the forum that's been shut down twice
@@hugod1773 Wait, Twice? afaik the forum only shutter down once.
Damn.
this is actually pretty illuminating about what happens today
Who knows what happened to the idea there would be more titles in this series as DHF described in the fwd?
RIP Luke's inbox
Kinda just and intro. Read Colin Woodard’s "American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America" for a more complete picture.
This is good
Great video! Thanks!
One thing that I’m realizing that every one seems to forget is that borderers settled across the Inland regions of the United States. From Western New England all the way down to much of Florida.
They strongly contributed to the Western New England and Western Pennsylvania dialects just as they contributed to the Inland Southern dialects. And the cultures that spread West in all of these regions was largely the Western Variety of those cultures that had been influenced by the borderers.
So the borderers aren’t exclusively a Southern Group, we have Pennsylvania borderers and New England Borderers. Similar to the South, the borderers cultures gradually merged with the Eastern cultures over time and especially after the Eastern cultures spread west. But the borderer influence is still there just like it is in the South.
A second thing that I noted is that you mentioned that the primary division between the Trump and Obama coalitions is race. But I think that is only partially true.
Trump seems to represent a large coalition of mostly (but not entirely) White Americans who are established into the four British Groups. But Trump is largely unpopular among educated voters (many of whom are also Old Stock Americans) who live outside of the Deep South.
The Obama/democratic coalition is not primarily made up of Non-White or immigrant voters. The Obama Coalition is made of largely Educated and mostly Northern White Americans who are allied with Black and immigrant voters as well sexual minorities.
The educated group of Northern Whites is an important group here as they still define many of the core values of the Democratic Party and many of them are Old Stock Americans just like those in the trump coalition.
Educated? You mean indoctrinated in a leftie factory called university. Or college. Or whatever.
My interpretation is that the old stock puritans stopped practicing christianity, but are still the same deeply religious people. They just worship social justice and other marxist descended religions
@@warlord733 Thats one way of looking at it. There definitely is a connection between the modern Democratic Party and Old New England Culture.
Does anyone have the audiobook to share? pretty please
@The Mad Baron you should check this out.
Damn I am straight up 50/50 borderer and planter
Im curious about the movement of germans to america, since that seems to be equal to or even greater than british ethnicity. Also, if the episcopalians are planters, how do they later become yankee wasps?
Germans didn't come in droves in till 1800s non english speaking people's were not trusted especially by the borders
@@aaronbliss7192 germans were actually present in america for about as long as the Quakers were and ccx only grew further in influence and admixture as time went on. Eventually though, the germans ended up becoming indistinguishable from Anglos because A) they had common religious ground enough that they could just intermarry at will and B) they were very diverse in terms of economic range which meant that German bankers, craftsmen and farmers would eventually just congregate with Anglo bankers, craftsmen and farmers rather than each other. This meant that unless a bunch of germans settled together in an insular or otherwise socially distinct culture (like Amish, Mennonites and the Lubbock County germans), they would simply absorb themselves into the surrounding culture and integrate. The book Beyond the Melting Pot explains this process in detail towards its conclusion.
@@joker-0723 in the southern colonys and Appalachia I've done a lot of genealogy very few German surnames before 1800. I can't say for the north.but it's true scotch Irish and english dominate before then.
@@aaronbliss7192 German immigration largely centered itself on the North and the midwest from what I remember for numerous reasons particularly with Quakers being more pliable to accepting outsiders and the midwest being useful farmland. Any protestant could make their way to Philadelphia and coexist there if they weren't somehow unruly.
@@joker-0723 Exactly. Spot on. My ancestors on my mom's side were either French Protestant or German Protestant from Alsace-Lorraine (records were bad and due to assimilation who knows if great meemaw spoke French or German, some of them probably spoke both.) and nowadays my mom is entirely indistinguishable from a WASP. These ancestors moved to the border gradient of the upper and lower Midwest, learned English and forgot their native tongue in a couple generations, and culturally mixed with other English speaking white Protestants in the area who had the same or very similar attitudes, foods, games, idioms, et cetera. Once the language barriers weakened, it took no time at all for intermarriage and growing up going to the same schools to make them indistinguishable.
I think the same thing is beginning to happen more broadly across American society, of course not nationally, just that every locality is becoming more integrated. I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago as an older Zoomer and I had several friends that it sounds funny to call "multiracial" and/or "multiethnic" because the concept of race and ethnicity starts to break down when you're a "mix" of so many and your daily cultural life is indistinguishable from a white European mutt like me (my dad's side is southern and eastern European). I just hope people can add their cultural traditions to the melting pot successfully instead of losing them and becoming traditionless blobs. My Romanian family members for example really lost all their traditional Romanian cuisine, and Romanians were never enough of a cultural force for any Romanian dishes to go mainstream like German-American or Italian-American ones did. I think we can retain our heritage without necessarily remaining distinct ethnic groups, it just means we take on the heritage of others and give some of our own. Maybe the melting pot will become increasingly real over time.
Hmm my ancestors from North Carolina were originally Yeo men but sum of them did become semi wealthy plantation owners.
holy fuck. I'm only 20 minutes into the last one.
I like thickness in my books and videos.
Borderers Represent!
What do you think about the tradition that Joseph of Arimathea and a young Jesus went to Britain?
The one thing all of the 4 groups could agree on is no more groups. LOL
Not true. The Quakers welcomed German, Swiss, and French immigrants, which is why they became a minority by the 1750s.
Did you read the Slate Star article on the book?
Thank you for this video. Sorry I am just now watching this, but I just finished this book and think it is one of the greatest on immigration and American History. I'm going to check out your other reviews, they are really good.
it's 01:30 ffs
I finished late and was going to release it tomorrow morning, but I was antsy and couldn't get to sleep so I just uploaded it now so I can got to bed ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@@LukeSmithxyz Fair enough
@Spooky Ghost I've evolved into Treveloper The Developer now, though I appreciate the recognition
Now I need to check out this book to see how Italians fit in this. Catholic, non-North European, and ghettoized for a good while before integrating. Ethno-nationalists swear Italians fitted perfectly and smoothly into the social fabric of America, immigrants with a South European heritage that happen to come from Latrine America are supposed to be a whole different case.
I never heard a ethno-nationalist who said italians fitted perfectly well in the beginning. The largest lynching in American History was of Italians (in the south which is surprising), Italians did however in a few decades fit smoothly in white america
“Albion’s Seed.” No Italians.
Italians integrated decently after a while but it took a long time and required widespread acceptance of Catholicism.
@K F a lot of them have integrated to varying degrees around the country. They might not be a part of the traditional culture in the same extent as Dixie or new England but as an accepted and normal group of the wider fabric of American culture and within the scope of middle America as pioneered by the Quakers, they have long now been woven into American society.
Considering how discriminated Catholics were and how literally no one had any sympathy towards them both the Irish and Italians did pretty well. Now they are seeing as traitors by progressives because they didn't make things easy for black people ( all of these groups were desperately poor and competing for the same jobs). I see something like this happening with Latinos.
Goldwater was 50% Jewish, but 100% Episcopalian.
Byrd's diary is one of the most interesting works I can think of.
The "I made my slave drink piss" line is absolute hilarity.
"I rogered her twice!"
Methodism is dead.
At least there’s still spirited debate in the SBC; but things look to be going in the wrong direction.
I’ll have to listen to Al Mohler this coming week.
Thiccccccness of the book
In days of yore from Britain's shore
Read this book and realized I had ALL the cultures in my ancestry--indentured servants (but thank the gods, not slaveowning planters), wild backwoods Scots-Irish, a few Quakers, but at least 80% uber-Puritans . . . and let's not forget there were smatterings of Dutch and Huguenot intermarried with those Puritans. Anything, as long as it wasn't (horrors) Catholic.
I which this video had more slides picture related to every paragraph .
denominations not religions.
1:36 "Normal" languages?! You mean INDO-EUROPEAN languages. And for Quakers, the use only of "thou" is a mark of their being a "brotherhood" in which all are equal before God (no class distinctions). And for that matter, as I remember from fourth grade, it was the SWEDISH settlers in Delaware in the 1630s, not the much later Scots-Irish, who introduced the log cabin. This is typical of the education level of the narrator. I've read sixth-grade term papers with more sophisticated language, and historical sophistication. The book itself is a classic, and doesn't need to be read all at one go--you can read sections as desired. As for the picture/cartoonish parody of "The Cholmondeley Ladies," I don't know why Donald Trump is in it, since his family is 20thc immigrants from Scotland and Germany.
A southern Baptist who is steeped in history… what!? Curious, are you still Baptist?
If I said I was a baptist here, it is only by ethnic origin. I am an Orthodox Christian now.
@@LukeSmithxyz Hey Luke! Quick question, you ever planning to make another episode of not related?
Great content Ty. The black vote for Trump is growing. It's quite sad our "choice" of candidates.
what us an inner x pill?
The people that ruled Albion we're associated with the Giants of the Bible. The word giant does not necessarily mean someone of large size but someone of supernatural intelligence and strength and they are extremely wicked. When Brutus invaded Albion he kicked out the Giants who I believe moved into Scandinavia. I believe the people that moved into Albion later to be call it Britain were the Israelites. Europe was the promised land of the Israelites for a thousand years of peace after the Messiah was born and set them free and then after that thousand years of Peace ended in 1066 Magog came back from their northern prison in Scandinavia to take back their land and enslave the Israelites of Europe and then spread their lawless democracy on the rest of the world.
What are you talking about?
@@TheSpecialJ11 He's actually correct, the last giant of Britain was called Gogmagog. The Israelites came to Britain and are the true brits. Today, they are known as the Welsh, but the real name is the Cymru. There were various King Arthurs who are part of this line. You can even read Egyptian Hyroglyphs using the Welsh language. The current monarchy have supressed this.
linux video when?
Puritans leading the way with anti-coomer/nofap mindset.
They're basically an IRL munchkin faction. Super cohesive, crazy high birth rates, very industrious and well-educated. Their only weaknesses Fischer described was unquestioning deference to the elderly (even if demented) and not being very charming people.
@@ingold1470 I think Puritans are the source of American moral panic. The belief that you will be posses by a demon through rock and roll or video games or the prohibition. But additionally, I think the moral panic of modern sjw is the same type of Puritan thinking. Need to cleanse language, culture and behavior, to prevent people getting possesed by evil.
@@Mbeluba It's the descendants of the same people doing it, and Puritan-founded universities like Harvard and Yale are propagating it so it's not too much of a stretch. People compare "whiteness" to Catholic original sin, but it's more like Calvinist Total Depravity. It's like Marcuse & friends came into Yankeeland right when original Puritanism was on the way out, and gave them a new way to channel the old impulses.
@@Mbeluba I think the divide among progressives in SJW vs not SJW is a puritan vs quaker divide. Thanks to the internet and other forms of communication that transcend geography, different values have been able to spread broadly in the country and among individual members of otherwise disparate ethnic groups. I believe this has lead to a lot of young urban people splitting along these old ideological lines that used to be much more regionally and class divided. The same can be said of the spread of borderer values into the rural north and spread of planter values among puritan industrialists (or at least their descendants.)
@@Mbelubaholy sht
harping
intollarance
>tfw Borderer
Albion was Doggerland a large landmass ,land which is the British Isles a land of Celts which sunk underneath the ocean home of the black Irish a an extinct Britannic tribe of Celts who who looked south European ,Latin ,Hellenic ,Illyrian, Thracian then Nordic ,Germanic or Celtic who came from the Mediterranean sea basin from the Iberian peninsula in the western Pyrenees mountains in Pyrenees mountains with Celtic blood from the Celtic homeland who spoke a Celtic Britannic language now extinct who were cousins to extinct Celts ,Gaunches, CeltoIberians ,Tocharians, Germanics ,Nordics, basques, Catalans who came from the Celtic homeland and Indo-European homeland .
So, as a Greek...we wuz Celts n shiet?!?
cool book. the borderers bit sounded a bit head-scratchy. i might skim through some of those chapters. i'm still not going to church luke.
i swear to god if your reading list ends up being full-on reactionary i know like 3 other guys on youtube that post /g/ memes
Why head-scratchy? see Ulster Scots.
Which other guys?
I will never ever ever regret severing my relationship with religion
religion is fake created by ancient alpha male to control the sheep .
@K F probably because you chose to read it in a voice that wasn't flattering or true. fucking devolvee
all you got?
wow what a profile pic. Def devolvee candidate right hur
Based on what findings
Where did the ideologies of White, Imported Christians to North America come from?
J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc
*El Kana ( אל קנא)* is the name of God found in the Bible.
In the Ten Commandments, God declares that he is El-kana
Exodus 20:5, Deuteronomy 5:9
Moses calls God El kana (yhwh qana shemu *el-qana* hewa)
Exodus 34:14
YHVH identifies Himself as El Kana.
Deut 4:24, 5:9; 6:15; 1 Kings 19:10, 14
*The name El-kana consists of two elements:*
*EL (אל),* the prominent Canaanite deity whose name became applied to the God of israEL.
*Kana (קנא),* which forms Kannan, the Tamil Hindu name for Krishna;
Kannan is also the source of the name Canaan, named after Cain, the avenging priest, the spear;
Canaan is the promised land of milk and honey, favorite foods of Hindus since the Vedas.
There are "Hindu deities" throughout the Old Testament, such as Arjuna, Bala, Kali, Ramah, Uma. There are numerous Hindu names, Isaiah and Isaac, containing the Isa root. Isa is a name of Shiva and Oshea, or Hosea, is a transliteration of Osseo, another name of Shiva.
*For in the seventh day God ended his work which he had made, and on the seventh day he rested from all his work, which he had made.*
SHIVA is the Lord of the Sabbath, which has its roots Sheba meaning seven (7).
see: Shaba, Saba, Tsaba, Seba, Sheba, Shebah, Shibah
SHIBAH, means Seven in Genesis 32-33
*Genesis **26:33*
The Well, the City, and ISAac have been named after SHIVA, as the root of ISAac means SHIVA.
Genesis 28:22
This stone pillar (matSEBA) shall be God’s house.
Gen 31:45
Jacob erects the stone pillar (matSEBA).
*Judaism is taught at the yeSHIVA.*
J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc
teaches hate, slavery, animism, penis worship, and the diet of carnivorism.
What are you talking about. El/Ill/Yll or Hell/Hyll/Hill - Star.. Kan - They have. Kanun/Kanon/Kanyn - (notice how the vowel can change). Kan - They have un/on/yn/en/el/ell/yll - (notice how the n converts into L or LL) Star. "They Have a Star".
Moses, Mesus, Mason. Ma - He/She/It/They are. Ses/Sus/Son(Za/Ze/Zen/Zan/Zeu/Zeri/Zani/Zeus - Sound/Voice/Teacher. "He Is Sound/Voice/Teacher.
Get lost with your bs.
@@kapelbaza6130
EL Kana ( אל קנא) is the name of God found in the Bible.
Judaism is taught at the yeSHIVA.
J E Wdaism/ Roman Empire/ Holy Roman Empire/ Jesuits/ Protestants or other spinoffs/ Freemasonry/ etc. teaches hate, slavery, animism, penis worship, and the diet of carnivorism.
The Hindu Bindi or Tilaka, the mark on the forehead was worn by the original J E Ws and Christians. The Bindi can be found in the story of Moses and the Israelite's fleeing Egypt, and by the elect in Ezekiel who describes in great detail marking the forehead, and by the elect and saved in Revelations.
Revelation 7:3
Those who have God's mark, or sign (His Sabbath), in their foreheads.
Exodus 13:16
it will be a sign on your hand and a symbol on your forehead
The bindi is also seen twice in the Book of Ezekiel, in the 9th and 16th chapters.
Ezekiel 9:4-6
A wrath-filled God, observing the holocaust of animal sacrifice, the abominations of Jerusalem, tells his helpers to put the bindi on the foreheads of those who are against the abominations in the Temple of Jerusalem. One man among them was clothed with linen, with a writer’s ink-horn by his side.
God says: "Go through Jerusalem, and put a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed in it." And to the others he said in my hearing, "Pass through the city after him, and smite; your eye shall not spare, and you shall show no pity; slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women, but touch no one upon whom is the mark. And begin at my sanctuary."
In the above scriptures those who have compassion, those who sigh and groan over all the abominations committed in Jerusalem -- location of the Temple and its animal sacrifices -- have a mark put upon their foreheads. This is Ezekiel's way of describing J e wdaism identification with the Hindu, Buddhist tradition.
We see John of Patmos attempting making the same link with the bindi in the "Book of Revelations."
The Bindi in Revelations is the mark of the blessed and the saved, which is mentioned numerous times, in this work where there is no more sorrow and death, and therefore no longer any animal sacrifices. Moreover in Revelations the creatures above, on and beneath the earth all praise the Creator. Now that there is nothing accursed, i.e. that will be oppressed, enslaved and killed, sacrificed, no animal's life is threatened. The brutal demonic morals of the false scriptures, the Pentateuch of Jewdaism is at an end.
Revelations 7:3
Do not harm the earth or the sea or the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God upon their foreheads.
Revelations 9:4
And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree: but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.
Revelations 14:1
Then I looked, and lo, on Mount Zion stood the Lamb, and with him a hundred and forty-four thousand who had his name and his Father's name written on their foreheads.
Revelations 22:3-5
There shall no more be anything accursed, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and his servants shall worship him; they shall see his face, and his name shall be on their foreheads. And night shall be no more; they need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they shall reign for ever and ever.
The mark on the forehead is not the only clear demonstration of the Hindu origins of the pure remnant of J e wdaism in Revelations. The rider on the white horse in Revelations is derived from the Hindu Prophecy, wherein Krishna will return as Kalki on a white horse to help remove dEVIL from Earth. Christians of course, after all the re-writes designate the rider as Jesus Christ.
@@kapelbaza6130 indoctrination got your tongue?
@@Lawiah0 dude stop reciting books. Can you explain the words? Can you use morphology to break them down. What indoctrination idiot. You mean the church has you brain washed. Indians say they are arians. Ar - Gold. Ian - They are. "They're Gold" . I'm talking about the ultimate code which is language. Explain stuff to me linguistically. I'm not interested in anything else
@Lee Smith
Your disassociation is duly noted.
...
WHO INVENTED THE SPACE ENTERPRISE?
It was the Roman Judaeo-Freemasonry Vatican (Jesuits) who published Heliocentricism (a corporation that has fooled billions of people) as the next centuries ticked by these science fiction stories began entering the major Universities (all faith based); from this point on the people were taught to replace Faith (pretend) with Theory (pretend).
...
1543 - Jesuits invent Theory Heliocentricism
1582 - Jesuits invent Heliocentric calendar (Pope Gregorian calendar)
1651 - Jesuits invent Moon features (Selenography)
1658 - Jesuits invent Theory of Germ disease (see Virus)
1763 - Jesuits invent Theory Atomic Energy
1809 - Jesuits invent Theory Transmutation of Species (see Theory of Evolution)
1923 - Jesuits invent Theory Missing Link (bones lost molds prove find)
1931 - Jesuits invent Theory Big Bang (another ejaculation into the virgin source)
...
Lets recap - Roman Judaeo-Freemasonry sell two (2) products:
1. HEAVEN, Faith (pretend)
2. SPACE, Theory (pretend)
...
i58.servimg.com/u/f58/19/39/28/69/blue_m11.jpg
Can't judge this book without reading it, but in giving an ethnoreligious history of America its hilarious that Catholics, notably Irish, Italian and Central European Catholics, get completely written out. No mention of JFK, Biden, local Chicago, NY, or Boston politics. It'd be near impossible to understand 19th century American politics without touching on this let alone what's come to pass since.
you guys are just visitors.....
@@steve19811 mmhmm so you're a modern day Know Nothing-er huh? Luckily for you you're not a back in the day Know Nothing-er. I doubt they would've let you around the clubhouse other than to clean it Herr Beisheim
They're outside the scope of this study. The book focuses solely on Anglo immigration of the 17th-18th centuries, their folkways and their influence on the 13 colonies and early United States, and the imprint they left on the regions they settled. The author does make an assertion that subsequent immigrants largely assimilated to/picked-up their local regional folkways, and gives examples like JFK's prim-and-proper New England manners and education, and Barry Goldwater's western style of dress and libertarian beliefs.
I think there is a little confusion here, while I agree the term ''scots irish'' is inaccurate as the term was only created in the 19th century by the know nothing movement in order to justify discrimination against the Catholic Irish, the reality is most of the ''borders'' had no English or Scottish ancestry to speak of. In the records they only ever refer to themselves as Irish and most of the Celtic culture they brought to America was derived from Irish culture.
All public documents of the day, immigration lists,
newspapers, etc. invariably refer to those colonists as “Irish”; that they called themselves “Irish”
in America called them “Irish” and in many places ostracized them as such; that
they called their settlements by Irish names; that they founded societies which
they called “Irish” and celebrated the national festival of Ireland.
Today you can still see strong connections between the music, dance and way they speak which is remarkably similar to nearly every corner of Ireland.
Historian Micheal J O'brein actually painstakingly went through thousands of news paper clippings, muster rolls ect and found that the majority also bore quintessentially Irish surnames, this doesn't include all the possible anglicized Irish surnames.archive.org/details/hiddenphaseofame00obri/page/134
In the United States in 1790 about 400,000 people of Irish birth or descent-about half were from an Ulster background, and the others from the three remaining provinces of Ireland.
Blessing, Patrick J. (1980). "Irish". In Thernstrom, Stephan (ed.). Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 528.
Again these people where Irish in every sense of the word and would have identified as Irish and were heavily intermixed with the native Irish if not completely native Irish. The majority of Irish Americans today are actually descended from Irish colonial immigrants and are mostly protestant, they don't identity as ''Scots Irish'' just simply Irish.
www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/rac.2006.16.1.25?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Dude that’s just incorrect, the Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots are not Catholic Irish; they came from the Anglo-Scottish border, lowland/southern Scotland, and northern England (particularly Northumberland and Cumberland). In fact the Jackson line of President Andrew Jackson, originated in the East Riding of Yorkshire, England.
The non-Ulster-Scots “Irish” in colonial America, were mostly English in origin; they were Protestant Anglicans by and large. The colonial Fitzsimons family for example, was of Anglo-Norman extraction, with possible origins in Herefordshire. The basketball legend Larry Bird is another example. His “Irish” side (like Henry Ford’s “Irish” side) is actually Anglo-Irish. The Anglo-Irish are the descendants of Protestant English planters, who settled Ireland beginning in the 17th century. This “New English” population, would spawn an intellectual and educated upper class within the country, a class that would produce men such as William Butler Yeats, Jonathan Swift, Oscar Wilde, and Samuel Beckett.
The Ulster-Scots/Scotch-Irish in the US, had a general dislike for the newly arrived Catholic Irish immigrants; so much so that the term “Scots-Irish” came about, as a way for these people to distinguishing themselves from the new arrivals. They are not the same people, just like an Irishman saying he’s “English” because he was born in England to Irish parents, isn’t English, case and point Charles Altamont Doyle, father of author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
The Scots-Irish literally spoke Scots English, which is linguistically derived from Anglic English, the language spoken by the Angles of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Northumbria. Moreover, in relation to the ethnic breakdown of the Scots-Irish, I give reference to the White River Valley Historical Quarterly, Volume 4, Number 4, November 1971: “In order to clarify this paradox in the "Scotch-Irish" terminology, we shall have to go back to the old Whitehall Palace in London, on a day in September 1607, only four months after the English had planted the first permanent colony in America. King James I was disturbed by reports of further turbulence in his unruly Irish dominion. He decided to act on a proposal by Sir Arthur Chichester, Lord Deputy of Ireland, to repeople the island with Protestants.
That was the beginning of the Ulster Plantation. What then formed nine counties of Northern Ireland (now six counties) was actually re-peopled in the 17th century with Protestants from Northern England and the Lowlands of Scotland. The proportion was roughly four Scots to one Englishman. They largely displaced what Macaulay referred to as the "aboriginal Irish," who were almost wholly Catholic. The Scots were Presbyterians and the English Anglicans with some dissenting creeds.”
Warwickshire-born folklorist Cecil Sharp, spent months observing the culture of the Appalachian highlands, and after a careful study of the traditional songs, ballads, dances, and singing-games that he saw there, he concluded that they had their origins in that part of England ‘where the civilization was least developed - probably the North of England, or the Border country between Scotland and England.’
Dan Jackson-author of “The Northumbrians: The North-East of England and Its People, A New History” (Hurst, 2019)-penned an article entitled “How Northern England Made the Southern United States,” and in it, he had this to say about the Scotch-Irish: “The durability of that Border culture among these settlers was striking. First, American backcountry speech was descended directly from the language spoken by Northumbrians, Cumbrians and the Scots Borderers during the 17th and early 18th century. For example, the use of ‘man’ was - and is - commonly used in Cumberland and Northumberland by a wife to refer to her husband, as in the Tammy Wynette classic ‘Stand by Your Man’. Similarly ‘honey’ as a term of endearment was transplanted from north Britain (and lives on in Northumbrian speech as ‘hinny’), as well as ‘let on’ for tell, ‘nigh’ for near and ‘lowp’ for jump. The distinctive pronunciation of Appalachian and southern US speech too had its roots in north Britain: with ‘sartin’ for certain, ‘deef’ for deaf and ‘widder’ for widow.
The place names of this region also spoke of northern English roots. In North Carolina alone, there is a Durham Branch, several Durham Creeks, Durham County and Durham Township as well as the city of Durham (and the port most of these borderers landed in was Newcastle on the Delaware river). In Pennsylvania there are the counties of Westmoreland and Northumberland, as well as the dozens of places named after Cumberland - either the northern English county, or the ‘Butcher’ scourge of the Jacobites. There’s an Orange County in Virginia, too, and one explanation for the origin of the term ‘Hillbillies’ is that it derived from the backsettlers’ loyalty to William III.”
Some Scotch-Irish families descend from indigenous Irish families who converted to Protestantism, while other families are descended from Manx, Welsh, and southern/southeastern English families (some of them being Baptists). An even smaller minority of Scotch-Irish descend from Calvinist German Palatines, French Huguenots, Walloons and/or Flemings. Davy Crockett for example, was patrilineally descended from French Huguenots. However, the vast majority of Scots-Irish/Ulster-Scots, descend from Anglican/Presbyterian sects of northern Englishmen and southern Scotsmen. We can actually trace the origins of Ulster-Scot families (like the Jackson line) back to southern Scotland and northern England. It’s not made up nonsense.
@@JBroughton2 You clearly didn't read my comment.
@@thenextshenanigantownandth4393 “the reality is most of the ‘borders’ had no English or Scottish ancestry to speak of.” Yeah that’s completely and utterly false. They were different from the indigenous Irish; the Ulster-Scots/Scots-Irish are derived from the Angles of Northumbria (the Norse too, though their influence is harder to discern because of how similar the Angles and Danes were to each other), the Gaelic Scots, and the Britons of Strathclyde.
@@JBroughton2 Claim it's false yet have provided no evidence to support this old chest nut myth. Records don't support this old myth cooked up by the know nothing movement and the scots Irish societies.
@@thenextshenanigantownandth4393 not an argument, I gave you 9 paragraphs worth of evidence. The Jackson line goes back to Yorkshire, the Nixon line goes back to the Scottish/English Borderlands. The Ulster-Scots speak a language that is heavily derived linguistically from Scots, a Northumbrian, Anglic dialect. The areas they settled in the US, have place names like “Durham,” “Cumberland,” “Northumberland,” and “Westmoreland.”
Fact is America was founded by Protestant Anglos. The aboriginal Irish only came in great numbers much later in the 1840s, to the great detriment of the US. Most of the Irish upper class and educated class, were of Anglo-Scottish origins, going back to the Anglo-Norman invasion. Jonathan Swift, Robert Boyle, George Berkeley, William Rowan Hamilton, Oscar Wilde, Samuel Beckett, CS Lewis, WB Yeats, all descended from the second wave of “New English” settlers, also known as the Anglo-Irish.
You also seem to ignore the fact that Scotland has an extreme Gaelic influence, which historically stretches all the way back to the end of Roman Britain, and to the beginnings of Anglo-Saxon Britain. The Scots were Gaelic speakers, and by the 10th century, Gaelic had become the dominant language throughout northern and western Scotland, absorbing or displacing the Brythonic speakers of Scotland, such as the Picts, and the Cumbrians. So of course there is going to be a good amount of crossover with Ireland linguistically. There are many surnames/names of Gaelic origin in Scotland, such as McCormick, MacDonald, and Kennedy; that doesn’t mean the Scottish are really “Irish.” This also applies to Scottish names of Germanic origin, since both the Vikings and Anglo-Saxons (specifically the Angles and possibly the “Frisians”) settled Scotland, which again, doesn’t mean the Scottish are really “Danish,” “Norwegian,” “Frisian,” or “English.”
33
At first I thought he was catholic and it was kinda cringe. Now that I know that he's south baptist I know he's EXTREMELY cringe.
I wouldn't put any stock in any of this nonsense.
Im a big fan of at least 10 of your videos so far and will watch more but this is factually inaccurate and very american.
whats wrong also is American an insult?
Damn
Just stumbled upon this video while watching larbs stuff. Extremely interesting.