Please read the description for my thoughts on whether 48FPS has a space in filmmaking. Also, I go through the obvious downsides of this trailer in 48FPS. And my personal experiences seeing this film. Cheers, mates.
There was one film called The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey that came out in 2012 and Peter Jackson shot the film in 48fps as he thought it would be the next experience for people to see. There were mixed reactions about it when it came out in 3D theaters that had it. There were some people who thought it was an improvement over the choppy 24fps experience. Some called it a disadvantage and looked like a cheap movie set or a BTS shoot. Were you one of those people who’ve seen it at a local 3D theater in 48fps?
Problem with 48 FPS is you were able to make out all the probs and "shitty" make up like the scene with the dwarfes in bilbos house, the noses just looked horrible.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Please read the description for my thoughts on whether 48FPS has a space in filmmaking. Also, I go through the obvious downsides of this trailer in 48FPS. And my personal experiences seeing this film. Cheers, mates.
Fantastic !
There was one film called The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey that came out in 2012 and Peter Jackson shot the film in 48fps as he thought it would be the next experience for people to see. There were mixed reactions about it when it came out in 3D theaters that had it. There were some people who thought it was an improvement over the choppy 24fps experience. Some called it a disadvantage and looked like a cheap movie set or a BTS shoot. Were you one of those people who’ve seen it at a local 3D theater in 48fps?
Problem with 48 FPS is you were able to make out all the probs and "shitty" make up like the scene with the dwarfes in bilbos house, the noses just looked horrible.