World's Loneliest Wolf | Falkland Islands Wolf

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 авг 2022
  • The Falkland Islands Wolf went extinct in 1876. Even though we know how it perished, how it ended up on Falkland Islands is still a mystery…
    #Falklandislandswolf #charlesdarwin #wildlife #documentary #nature #wolf #wolves #wildlifedocumentary #history #extinctanimals
    Falkland Island Wolf Specimen by Kane Fleury / Otago Musuem Licensed Under CC BY 4.0
    (commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
    Falkland Island Wolf Specimen by Kane Fleury / Otago Musuem Licensed Under CC BY 4.0
    (commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
    Sheep on Falkland Islands by Kuhnmi Licensed Under CC BY 2.0
    (commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
    Maned Wolf by Sage Ross Licensed Under CC BY 3.0
    (commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
    Patagonians at Gregory Bay via Wellcome Images Licensed Under CC BY 4.0
    (commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...)
    Further Reading -
    theconversation.com/history-m...
    abcnews.go.com/Technology/hum...
    www.nationalgeographic.com/an...
    www.latimes.com/science/la-xp...
    www.smithsonianmag.com/scienc...
    www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2...
  • ЖивотныеЖивотные

Комментарии • 535

  • @AegleCreations
    @AegleCreations  Год назад +17

    I've included some sources and articles for further reading in the video description. Thanks!

    • @pablorey9203
      @pablorey9203 4 месяца назад +1

      Great video. The history part was wrong, the islands were discovered by Spain.. they belong to Argentina, btw. thank you for mentioning the name Malvinas. Hope my comment did not bother you. I recently discovered your channel, and it is great. Guess RUclips recommended a video of your channel because of the emphasis you have on Sri Lanka... "the tigers of (i don't remember)".
      So YT taught wildlife + Sri Lanka this video is for him. But these tigers were some other thing, part of a human catastrophe.

  • @GeorgeTheDinoGuy
    @GeorgeTheDinoGuy 2 года назад +185

    A truly fascinating animal, the Falklands still have two endemic species left that are being very well protected today, these are a wren species and the falklands steamer duck, one of the only flightless ducks!

  • @stonewolf7850
    @stonewolf7850 2 года назад +262

    Sad how their friendliness towards people, was exploited to extirpate them.

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  2 года назад +23

      Exactly!

    • @desellis8117
      @desellis8117 2 года назад +21

      a good/wholesome thing being terribly taking advantage off. :(

    • @nonenoneonenonenone
      @nonenoneonenonenone Год назад +10

      @@AegleCreations Thank you for such a depressing video.

    • @PackHunter117
      @PackHunter117 Год назад +18

      It literally looks like an animal like the Capybara that could’ve made a good pet if people didn’t kill them all. 😞

    • @dinogamer7214
      @dinogamer7214 Год назад +3

      Kinda like the dodo

  • @UmamiPapi
    @UmamiPapi 2 года назад +330

    How evil would you have to be to club and knife a friendly little dog for no reason other than to kill it?

    • @Chile-xo6do
      @Chile-xo6do 2 года назад +95

      Average british citizen moment*

    • @UmamiPapi
      @UmamiPapi 2 года назад +10

      @Easttowest For food and pelts.

    • @alphatrion100
      @alphatrion100 2 года назад +29

      We did it to thylacene too

    • @pugdad2555
      @pugdad2555 2 года назад

      humans kill more sheep than any animal

    • @mr.10dollars72
      @mr.10dollars72 2 года назад +32

      Ask the modern day Chinese

  • @aardwolf6668
    @aardwolf6668 Год назад +95

    As soon as it was stated that the Falkland Island Wolf was a wolf whose closest living relative is the maned wolf, I had to look it up for myself since it seemed contradictory because I've always heard that maned wolves aren't wolves either.
    From what I can tell, while they're both canini (true dogs) like wolves, they're part of the cerdocynonina subtribe which branched off from wolves and wolf-like true dogs.
    (Sorry if I stepped on any toes, but I felt like I should share this info)

    • @Hy-Brasil
      @Hy-Brasil Год назад +7

      never apologize for sharing information. toes be damned.

    • @aardwolf6668
      @aardwolf6668 Год назад +2

      @@Hy-Brasil I didn't see this until now but thanks for saying that. It might seem like a small thing, but I'm neurodivergent and have had a lot of struggles with this kind of thing so it's nice to be assured it was okay ^^;;

  • @theproblemmustbeinyourpant5910
    @theproblemmustbeinyourpant5910 Год назад +40

    Amazing how despite its reportedly tame nature we still managed to paint it as an “enemy of mankind” with our archaic way of thinking. Pray that we stop this madness our species brings.

  • @roiq5263
    @roiq5263 2 года назад +87

    Sad. Poor wolf just wanted to be friends. Humans are disgusting.

    • @houssem711
      @houssem711 4 месяца назад +1

      European colonialists to be precise😊....

    • @roiq5263
      @roiq5263 4 месяца назад +2

      @@houssem711 like other peoples don't hunt animals to extintion.

  • @zagortenay33
    @zagortenay33 2 года назад +134

    This video tells a lot about the true nature of human kind.

    • @NubhavK
      @NubhavK Год назад +13

      Yea...true nature of early European settlers

    • @michaelcraig9449
      @michaelcraig9449 Год назад +6

      Some people. Speak for yourself only. A lot of us would do anything to help them instead.

    • @michaelcraig9449
      @michaelcraig9449 Год назад +6

      @@NubhavK Not the general settlers. Mostly the militaries, and 1% money chaser robber barons. Not the general public.

    • @NubhavK
      @NubhavK Год назад

      @@michaelcraig9449 all right sure mate

    • @juanblanco1267
      @juanblanco1267 Год назад +13

      Our true nature is that we’re just animals and not as special as we think are. This isn’t our world. We’re just a part of it, and we’re about to pay steep price for acting like we own the place

  • @artawhirler
    @artawhirler 2 года назад +35

    Yeah, Bartholomew Sulivan probably didn't see any difference between the finches in the Galapagos either.

  • @ohianaw
    @ohianaw Год назад +17

    the fact it was the only endemic land mammal is sad

  • @nathanandsugar5252
    @nathanandsugar5252 2 года назад +24

    “They would even swim across to meet approaching ships,”
    Press A to receive your new quest

  • @royhay5741
    @royhay5741 2 года назад +25

    They were having the time of their lives until fucking humans arrived, who thus specicided them.

    • @yansideabacoa6257
      @yansideabacoa6257 Год назад +2

      Europeans*

    • @representman9836
      @representman9836 Год назад

      @@yansideabacoa6257 eh humans across the globe have caused mass extinction not just Europeans

  • @00dreamer00
    @00dreamer00 2 года назад +24

    Imagine getting hunted to extinction. Scary af

    • @wxlfmurdr
      @wxlfmurdr Год назад

      Yea and the only ones who deserve it is humans.

  • @zaneninjago410
    @zaneninjago410 Год назад +23

    To exterminate an entire species for such little gain is deplorable. My condolences.

  • @pef1960
    @pef1960 Год назад +13

    This makes me want to weep. We really are the ultimate invasive species...

  • @dickdastardly5534
    @dickdastardly5534 2 года назад +62

    Yet another animal eliminated by man - very sad and predictable 😟the stuffed remnants look so pitiful what a true shame for this innocuous animal.

    • @ZaidFrmDa922
      @ZaidFrmDa922 2 года назад +9

      White man*

    • @dickdastardly5534
      @dickdastardly5534 2 года назад

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 in this case perhaps but he Maori eliminated the Moa’ birds on New Zealand so not sure that race is the real issue here but if it makes you feel superior go ahead knock yourself out.

    • @redtobertshateshandles
      @redtobertshateshandles 2 года назад

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 racist comment.

    • @myhell7993
      @myhell7993 2 года назад

      I am still mad that we killed all the mammoths.

    • @myhell7993
      @myhell7993 2 года назад +7

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 must have irrefutable proof of this to assume. But what else would a racist say

  • @harunyoldash
    @harunyoldash 2 года назад +31

    İnteresting topic and great presentation. Love your videos.

  • @jaredmn8580
    @jaredmn8580 2 года назад +17

    Another animal extinct because we were douchebags

    • @gerharddeusser9103
      @gerharddeusser9103 12 дней назад

      They trusted humans because their ancestors had been domesticated already on the mainland. So sad and horrible. One of the most tragic stories ever.

  • @robertsansone1680
    @robertsansone1680 2 года назад +32

    Very interesting. Thank You. I've never heard of that species before. What a shame but predictable.

  • @reservedcheese
    @reservedcheese Год назад +13

    Who else wants to have this put on a deextinction list? There’s always someone who would want to buy it as a pet to pay for the cloning

  • @revertedakhi
    @revertedakhi 2 года назад +21

    Humans are really good at erasing species of animals in this planet.

    • @ZaidFrmDa922
      @ZaidFrmDa922 2 года назад +3

      White ppl*

    • @johnkeane1419
      @johnkeane1419 2 года назад

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 The English

    • @conornorris6815
      @conornorris6815 2 года назад +6

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 if you look at megafauna extinction rates by continents the highest rate is actually in precontact south America and Europe is actually quite low

    • @pierreparillon8937
      @pierreparillon8937 2 года назад +4

      @@ZaidFrmDa922 Tan people* There are no humans with pure white or black skin, we are all shades of brown and orange

    • @theotheseaeagle
      @theotheseaeagle 2 года назад +8

      @@conornorris6815 exactly. People always blame it on Europeans when in most cases they were already driven to near extinction by the native peoples (in some cases). For example the moa was driven extinct by the NZ natives long before European settlers arrived

  • @itsmeblank4028
    @itsmeblank4028 2 года назад +14

    So hold-up, people went to this land where this Canis lived uninterrupted for centuries and people sailed thousand of miles set up and Invasive species and decided that these animals that live here before them would be TOOOOO dangerous to livestock and so decided the easiest thing would just kill them 😕😕😕

    • @Kurominos1
      @Kurominos1 Год назад +3

      Human -kind in a nutshell i guess

    • @bickboose9364
      @bickboose9364 Год назад +1

      They lived uninterrupted for *6 million years* according to the video.

  • @tiagoking1312
    @tiagoking1312 2 года назад +111

    I remembered the Thylacine, a.k.a tasmanian wolf/tiger... Both Falk. wolf and Thylacine were the apex predators in their habitats (in the tiger's case, was the terrestrial, because crocs lurks in Tasmania's rivers), their appearence was relatively similar and, saddly, both were unfairly condenned by acusion to killing sheep. R.I.P both 😔🐾

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 2 года назад +4

      Thylacines never were apex predators. They were much smaller than commonly assumed, so not hunting animals close to their own size or larger.
      Australia’s ACTUAL apex land predators were killed off much earlier when the aboriginals first showed up. There was no apex predator in Australia for tens of thousands of years until dingoes were introduced, and even afterwards there was no native apex predator in Australia because the thylacine was never one in the first place.

    • @tiagoking1312
      @tiagoking1312 2 года назад +11

      @@bkjeong4302 I didn't said nothin about Australia, just Tasmania itself, there, the Thylacine was the apex, do not have other larger predator there on land, the other are small, in maximum, there is a medium sized predator, the Tasmania Devil. Thylacines were half the size of dingos in height and a bit longer in lenght, they weren't so little.

    • @Matt_from_Florida
      @Matt_from_Florida 2 года назад +5

      I am also unfairly condemned by accusation of killing sheep. Don't let them hunt me to extinction bro!

    • @davidhughes4189
      @davidhughes4189 2 года назад +15

      There are no crocodiles in Tasmania. The closest crocodile habitat is over 1000 miles north, in Queensland.

    • @bkjeong4302
      @bkjeong4302 2 года назад +1

      @@tiagoking1312 That's small as land predators go; most land predators around the size of a thylacine (thylacines only weighed around 15kg, far less than what colonists claimed) are too small to regularly hunt prey around their own size.

  • @Slendytubbies-Fanboy
    @Slendytubbies-Fanboy 5 месяцев назад +2

    I consider this to be one of, if not the most tragic extinction stories. A kind, gentle animal that only ate livestock to survive due to the disturbance of humans, & despite its tameness, we still managed to make it look like it threatened us. Every time I search about this animal, I always drop a tear. Yes, there numbers were already dwindling even before humans came to the Falkland Islands, but they were so welcoming to us. It really makes a person lose hope in humanity. However, it's better now, since awareness has become widespread. Hopefully, someday, even though it may not be possible, we'll be able to bring back this beautiful, majestic animal back from extinction, alongside others. (Sorry this was so long).

  • @Coelacanth_yes
    @Coelacanth_yes 2 года назад +12

    This is why people can't have nice things because they will destroy it

    • @ataranaoahakaraaf3786
      @ataranaoahakaraaf3786 2 года назад

      you have it see it right,we created a world full of ugly barren destructive and cursed things also in humanity and we cannot cope with pure innocence because we living by ouer own choice rather in hell than in a paradise accourse not we all love the evil from this world but we cannot behaved pure good without any darkness to answerd to the living creatures that naievely joyfull welcomed us with kind and friendly manner to the unknown that we are as visitors.we like to overexploited the world make everywhere when we settle space for ourself as overproductive species alone and driven other livings beings in extinction or kill it only for fun.how many peacefull and naievely friendly society,s to visitors has survived it to this day?and how many the more bloodthirsty agressively expansionistic society,s and religions the warmongering colonising migrating conquerers has founded the modern world?you have the answer.

    • @Coelacanth_yes
      @Coelacanth_yes 2 года назад +1

      @@ataranaoahakaraaf3786 did you seriously write all this out or did you just copy and paste it

  • @BeAniEbOii1
    @BeAniEbOii1 2 года назад +5

    Falk me! What an interesting pronunciation

  • @satchelofdoom1564
    @satchelofdoom1564 Год назад +6

    This is the saddest thing I’ve heard in a long time. Hopefully, one day science will correct some of the wrongs we have done.

  • @NatsuoxOkami
    @NatsuoxOkami Год назад +23

    This is so heart breaking, poor wolves. Human is sadly the most evil & invasive species known roam to Earth that has caused so many unnecessary extinction of creatures for selfish reasons. The Falkland Wolf is just one of those instances. Those wolves peacefully lived on those islands for who knows how long before humans showed up, took over the land to breed sheep, and had the gull to set a bounty on the wolves ( the islands only native predator ) as a 'threat' and hunted them to extinction. It is even stated that they were so tamed that the wolves were easily lured by meat and at close range was killed via clubbing or stabbing. That is so unnecessarily brutal for such a sweet animal.
    One day the universe is going to get tired of the human race's cruel & selfish BS and take us out like the dinosaurs so that nature to take over once again.
    Human kind is the reason the Earth is in such poor shape and we are the only ones to blame killing both animals and plant life alike.

    • @pyrotechnick420
      @pyrotechnick420 Год назад

      It's all about money. If each pelt got you $1,000 you would be tempted too. People back then couldn't fathom the Earth having a finite supply of resources, hell, most people didn't even have a clear picture of what the earth was at the time. Also the notion of a species going extinct didn't carry the same weight back then that it does today. The only redeeming factor in all of this is that we eventually saw the err of our ways and now we fight to save species that were previously decimated.

    • @ApeX-pj4mq
      @ApeX-pj4mq Год назад

      The only thing capable of wiping out humanity entirely would be a Gamma Ray Burst however even that wouldnt be able to affect you if you were underground. An asteroid strike would also fail to wipe out humanity, it would actually do less damage than the Gamma Ray Burst and we now possess the technology to redirect asteroids.
      Nature has a very small chance of wiping out humans

  • @bcdesilva
    @bcdesilva 2 года назад +8

    Very informative video with amazing facts! Thank you!👍👍

  • @Mickeymc5637
    @Mickeymc5637 2 года назад +5

    Lovely video mate, keep it up! 👏👏

  • @NaniFatimana
    @NaniFatimana Год назад +2

    Subscribed. I enjoy your channel a lot, keep up the good work.

  • @FazendaBarrancoAlto
    @FazendaBarrancoAlto Год назад +2

    Excellent, thank you!

  • @pyrotechnick420
    @pyrotechnick420 Год назад +5

    7:02 There is evidence that there were human cultures in South America before the mass migration over the Bering Sea. So this theory could have some merit considering that the theory is that natives from the pacific islands sailed to South America before 20,000 years ago.

  • @Mizt_Sim
    @Mizt_Sim Год назад +4

    once again, reasons why humans suck and we should live with the earth instead of constantly trying to exploit it

  • @nawa246
    @nawa246 2 года назад +5

    Good informative !

  • @marcogallazzi9049
    @marcogallazzi9049 Год назад +3

    Hard to give this a thumbs up, but it´s information that must be shared

  • @Frenchylikeshikes
    @Frenchylikeshikes Год назад +5

    Yet another truly unique species eradicated by humans.

  • @user-nacv-8867
    @user-nacv-8867 2 года назад +4

    Nice video. Thanks for sharing ❤️❤️❤️❤️

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  2 года назад +1

      Thanks!

    • @user-nacv-8867
      @user-nacv-8867 2 года назад

      @@AegleCreations Don.t forget to subscribe Thank you ❤️❤️🙏🙏

  • @spiritoflegend7483
    @spiritoflegend7483 Год назад +6

    Same thing happened with the Dodo, humans ruin everything man. We literally can’t have anything nice

  • @ProjectDarkWolf
    @ProjectDarkWolf Год назад +9

    One factual error I think: technically the Maned wolf, and presumably by extend the Falkland islands wolf are not true wolves at all. The Maned wolf is actually from the genus Chrysocyon, as opposed to Canis (wolves). Both are from the same parent family, Canidea. Still interesting enough for me to sub.

    • @indyreno2933
      @indyreno2933 Год назад

      @The Dark Wolf Project, actually, wolves and grey wolves are not the same thing, a wolf is any dog that is larger than either a fox, a jackal (including the coyote), or a wild species with the word "dog" in its name, therefore, the Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), the Pampas Wolf (Dusicyon avus), the Andean Wolf (Dusicyon cultridens), the Falkland Island Wolf (Dusicyon australis), the Zhoukoudian Wolf (Aenocyon variabilis), the Armbruster's Wolf (Aenocyon armbrusteri), the False Golden Wolf (Aenocyon ferox), the Edward's Wolf (Aenocyon edwardii), the Dire Wolf (Aenocyon dirus), the West Peruvian Wolf (Aenocyon nehringi), and the East Peruvian Wolf (Aenocyon gezi), the Ethiopian Golden Wolf (Flavocyon simensis), the Common Golden Wolf (Flavocyon lupaster), the White Wolf (Canis albus), the Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), the Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), Red Wolf (Canis rufus), and the Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes) are all wolves, wolves are an informal and polyphyletic group and are not a taxonomically defined or natural grouping, which is why there are living and extinct genera of dogs with species called "wolves".

    • @ProjectDarkWolf
      @ProjectDarkWolf Год назад

      @@indyreno2933 sorry, I should have used Latin and said they are not part of the same genus as C lupus, C rufus, lycaon , latrans etc, those closely related to the Grey wolf.

    • @indyreno2933
      @indyreno2933 Год назад

      @The Dark Wolf Project, actually, the Canis genus only applies to just eight extant species, the Grey Wolf (Canis lupus), the White Wolf (Canis albus), the Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), the Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), the Red Wolf (Canis rufus), the Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes), the New Guinea Singing Dog (Canis hallstromi), and the Dingo (Canis dingo), only six of these are wolves, the extant members of the Canis genus is entirely absent from Africa.

    • @ProjectDarkWolf
      @ProjectDarkWolf Год назад

      @@indyreno2933 I'm not really sure what point you're trying to make anymore.

  • @walitytoking72
    @walitytoking72 2 года назад +7

    The same fate of tasmanian tiger

  • @theolewell7535
    @theolewell7535 Год назад +2

    thank you :)

  • @peters.3558
    @peters.3558 2 месяца назад +1

    There are other examples of Land mammals reaching remote Islands by themselves. The polar Fox on Iceland, Reindeer on Svalbard / wolves and Musk ox on Greenland. They crossed the sea using ice in colder times like ice ages. Smaller mammals are less mobile, therefore they could not cross. It is unlikely for people in Canoes to get to the Falklands without modern Navigation.

  • @errolhorne1061
    @errolhorne1061 2 года назад +6

    Same happened to the Tasmanian Tiger

  • @McClarinJ
    @McClarinJ Год назад +4

    "Humans only arrived in the New World 20,000 years ago." I bet that "fact" will not age well. These supposed timelines keep being pushed further back in time.

  • @johannebaker9730
    @johannebaker9730 Год назад +3

    1592 was first landing in Falklands by John Davis sir. The 1690 landing was the second time? From Jo, based on Stanley, Falkland Islands. Thank you.

  • @toscadonna
    @toscadonna 2 года назад +3

    That was pretty dumb. They could’ve made a farm for those wolves and had pelts every year if they really wanted their pelts so that they wouldn’t have made them go extinct. The fact that they’re so tame makes me think they’d had human contact in their past and that humans brought them there in the past.

    • @theotheseaeagle
      @theotheseaeagle Год назад

      It’s common for island species to be unafraid of humans. Just like dodos etc

  • @BigJFindAWay
    @BigJFindAWay 2 года назад +26

    I think that an effort should be made to recreate this wolf. Maybe breed maned wolves to make them smaller with much shorter legs and a more fawn coloration.

    • @porculizador
      @porculizador 2 года назад +12

      Then you would have small maned wolves, not Falkland wolves. I don't know how close both species are genetically, but if they're viable, it is possible to fertilize a female maned wolf with the genes from a Falkland wolf obtained from existing specimens in museums and labs. Repeating this process and with some artificial selection or selective breeding you would end up with a legitimate Falklands Islands wolf.

    • @BigJFindAWay
      @BigJFindAWay 2 года назад +4

      @@porculizador That would be the ideal for certain, but I don't have a whole lot of faith in the whole cloning thing. It hasn't produced impressive results so far. But with gene splicing--hey it might just work. I think you may have something there.

    • @samrizzardi2213
      @samrizzardi2213 2 года назад +3

      That wouldn't change their dietary needs. Maned wolves have a diet consisting of 50% Amazonian fruit which doesn't grow on the Falklands.

    • @Ozraptor4
      @Ozraptor4 2 года назад +5

      What would stop the Falkland islanders from slaughtering them all again?

    • @porculizador
      @porculizador 2 года назад +2

      @@Ozraptor4 Usually, reintroductions are tolerated fairly well by locals, especially toward the later efforts of species reintroductions. Scientific criteria such as the IUCN Red List criteria help in a successful reintroduction

  • @pteranodon6612
    @pteranodon6612 Год назад +12

    It behaved like a domesticated dog. 🤔 A domesticated wolf transported by ancient humans. That seems to be the easiest explanation. We don't know for sure when humans arrived in South America.

  • @klausuhlig7141
    @klausuhlig7141 Год назад +4

    Older I get the more I'm convinced we got no buisness on this planet,

  • @beachboy0505
    @beachboy0505 Год назад +2

    Excellent video
    Very sad story
    The foxes 🦊 we’re glad to see people, but…

  • @mihaelbitola3812
    @mihaelbitola3812 2 года назад +5

    They survived for milions of years. And the cruel human beings have killed all of them.

  • @MrPaullyS
    @MrPaullyS 2 года назад +10

    How can the species maned wolf and Falk wolf "diverge 6 million years ago" but "share a common ancestor 70,000 years ago"?

    • @Chile-xo6do
      @Chile-xo6do 2 года назад

      The wolf from the islands was domesticated by indigenous tribes of the patagonia and brought to the islands, the tribes didn't stay in the islands for too long but the domesticated wolf did

    • @anthonypk7281
      @anthonypk7281 2 года назад

      It's possible a common ancestor survived for 5.3 million years after the divergence. So for much of that time, atleast three species branched out.

    • @____________838
      @____________838 Год назад

      Or they diverged from other Canid lineages 6 million years ago, and last shared a common ancestor with each other 70,000 years ago.

  • @TheZinmo
    @TheZinmo Год назад +13

    The maned Wolf is NOT a wolf in the strict sense. It is more closely related to foxes.
    This way, it was easy to find, that the falkland "wolf" was not a descendant of the domestic dogs of early south americans. (these dogs being the only reals wolfes on the whole continent)

    • @indyreno2933
      @indyreno2933 Год назад +2

      @MadZin Moo, actually, wolves and grey wolves are not the same thing, a wolf is any dog that is larger than either a fox, a jackal (including the coyote), or a wild species with the word "dog" in its name, therefore, the Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), the Pampas Wolf (Dusicyon avus), the Andean Wolf (Dusicyon cultridens), the Falkland Island Wolf (Dusicyon australis), the Zhoukoudian Wolf (Aenocyon variabilis), the Armbruster's Wolf (Aenocyon armbrusteri), the False Golden Wolf (Aenocyon ferox), the Edward's Wolf (Aenocyon edwardii), the Dire Wolf (Aenocyon dirus), the West Peruvian Wolf (Aenocyon nehringi), and the East Peruvian Wolf (Aenocyon gezi), the Ethiopian Golden Wolf (Flavocyon simensis), the Common Golden Wolf (Flavocyon lupaster), the White Wolf (Canis albus), the Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), the Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), Red Wolf (Canis rufus), and the Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes) are all wolves, wolves are an informal and polyphyletic group and are not a taxonomically defined or natural grouping, which is why there are living and extinct genera of dogs with species called "wolves".

    • @nicholaspawelski1031
      @nicholaspawelski1031 Год назад

      @@indyreno2933 From a taxonomy standpoint, a wolf is any member of the genus Canis. It has a much broader common usage due to how widely known the word and wolves themselves are, and other animals' similarities to them. The red panda and giant panda aren't closely related at all, with the red panda being most closely related to mustelids, while giant pandas are bears. Scientific names more closely follow relatedness than common names do.

    • @indyreno2933
      @indyreno2933 Год назад

      Actually, the red panda is more closely related to raccoons than to weasels, hence, raccoons and red pandas belong to the superfamily Procyonoidea, which is split into four extant families, Mephitidae (Skunks and Stink Badgers), Procyonidae (Raccoons, Ringtail, and Cacomistle), Ailuridae (Red Panda), and Nasuidae (Coatis, Olingos, Olinguito, and Kinkajou), also, the giant panda is not a bear, the biggest required feature that makes a bear a bear is the ability to roar because all bears roar, the giant panda cannot roar, therefore it is not a bear, the giant panda is the only extant member of the family Ailuropodidae, which is only classified within the broader superfamily Ursoidea, also, not all wolves belong to the Canis genus, the Canis genus only applies to six wolf species in addition to the oceanian wild dogs, the only six wolf species included under the Canis genus are the Grey Wolf (Canis lupus (cladistically including the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris))), the White Wolf (Canis albus), the Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), the Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), the Red Wolf (Canis rufus), and the Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes), the pale-footed wolf of the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent is more closely related to the oceanian wild dogs than it is to the other five wolf species under the Canis genus, the Canis genus is entirely absent from Africa, thus the Canis genus contains only eight extant species, the Grey Wolf (Canis lupus (cladistically including the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris))), the White Wolf (Canis albus), the Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), the Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), the Red Wolf (Canis rufus), the Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes), the New Guinea Singing Dog (Canis hallstromi), and the Dingo (Canis dingo), the new guinea singing dog and dingo (collectively known as oceanian wild dogs) are not considered wolves, therefore, not all Canis reps are wolves and not all wolves fall under the Canis genus, thus making wolves a polyphyletic group.

  • @darylholloway4
    @darylholloway4 2 года назад +3

    Maybe wasn’t a wolf but a dog brought from early settlers

  • @brianzulauf2974
    @brianzulauf2974 Год назад +3

    this animal was featured in the zoo tycoon 2 endangered species expansion pack.

  • @DOTTORE_FOX
    @DOTTORE_FOX Год назад +3

    Can you make a video where the topic is the discussion about cloning and reintroduce such species again?

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  Год назад +1

      Thanks for the suggestion… will try that - it’d be on a more positive note I guess, rather than the destruction man is capable of.

    • @DOTTORE_FOX
      @DOTTORE_FOX Год назад +2

      Yes the video would restore our faith in humanity again hahaha also there is species like the woolly Mammoth where scientists seriously consider to clone them and reintroduce them again in order to prevent large amounts of methane gas in Siberia where a healthy eco system could prevent worse outcomes

  • @johnroy2567
    @johnroy2567 Год назад +2

    MAN.....Guilty of the extinction of MANY species lost to the world....sad

  • @jesusjoseph1899
    @jesusjoseph1899 2 года назад +4

    Maritime Europeans: oh an animal
    Animal: you gonna draw me and tell others about my existence?
    Maritime Europeans: Yes and end you entire career
    Animal:😮‍💨

  • @tpk-all-day9111
    @tpk-all-day9111 Год назад +2

    This is why we can't have nice things.

  • @paulhickie6974
    @paulhickie6974 Год назад +4

    Poor wolf why are humans so cruel 😢.

  • @jamesblackshaw132
    @jamesblackshaw132 Год назад +1

    WHY am I only just hearing about this

  • @himself000
    @himself000 Год назад +8

    6:50 "Humans only arrived in the New World 20,000 years ago". We thought it was only around 12,000 years ago for a long time with the 'Clovis people' being the first, until recent discoveries. I'm sure we will find more evidence that will push this date way further back. Some megalithic archaeological sites in South America (Bolivia, Peru) are potentially extremely ancient and a variety of important food such as Squash and Maize are native to Amazonia as it was a probable centre of early plant domestication by humans, possibly around the same time it was happening in Mesopotamia.
    We have much to learn about South American history and judging on this wolf's natural friendliness to humans and unlikely place of origin, I can only imagine it is the surviving ancestor of a dog like companion of potentially ancient, sea-faring South American people - that we have yet to find proof of. Sometimes examples like this wolf that seem out of place may be evidence in itself that we may need to rethink what was possible. Before the end of the last glacial period around 12,000 years ago the climate was much more favourable for agriculture in South America and also sea levels were much lower with different looking coastlines globally so there may have also been a land bridge like the video suggests. What do you think?

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  Год назад +4

      Agreed about the date of arrival in the New World… there is a chance, as you say, the date being pushed back due to new evidence.

    • @himself000
      @himself000 Год назад +5

      @@AegleCreations Most isolated species are especially evasive in behaviour as a result. So interesting that this wolf was naturally friendly to humans, almost to an extent it was desperate for human affection, as domesticated dogs today were selectively bred by us to encourage friendliness towards humans. I cant imagine the population of wolves on the Falkland's was high enough, for long enough for there to have been much potential for much genetic change to occur naturally. Unless the lack of other animals on the island caused the wolves to become extremely lonely (poor lads) I dont know how else you would explain it! Sorry for the tangent your video really got me thinking :)

  • @GeorgeTheDinoGuy
    @GeorgeTheDinoGuy 2 года назад +3

    Where did you get the information that they swam out to boats? I’m aware national geographic says this but I can’t find any actual record of anyone accounting of this?

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  2 года назад +9

      It was in the original record of John Strong’s landing in 1690, which was written by a shipmate of his. As I mentioned in the documentary, they took one animal on board and kept it for several months, before it jumped out to sea after hearing the canon fire from ships during a battle with the French.

    • @GeorgeTheDinoGuy
      @GeorgeTheDinoGuy 2 года назад +3

      @@AegleCreations ah thank you, I guess since they had no real natural threats it makes sense. Do you have a link to the shipmates writings if that’s okay?

  • @rmsebatgaming5956
    @rmsebatgaming5956 Год назад +1

    I believe they were tame because they didn’t know what people were there for we did not pose a massive threat them

  • @torreeric499
    @torreeric499 Год назад +2

    For those humans who kill animals for various reasons, try putting yourself on the same situation as these animals. How would you feel if one day you find out that you are the last of your kind and yet despite that tragic fact, there are still those who try to hunt you down to kill you?... I really hate those people who poach or kill animals just because they feel like it or because they feel they need to despite having a lot of alternative solutions to whatever they are up to... Only proves that some humans have no respect to the natural order of things...

  • @johnroy2567
    @johnroy2567 Год назад +1

    During coverage of the Falklands (I won't call it a war) debacle of 1982 did anybody else notice an absence of wildlife...?

  • @bailey2913
    @bailey2913 2 года назад +12

    Darwin obviously never saw a Tasmanian tiger then.
    This isn’t related to Darwin, but humans are soo stupid, amazing we’ve got as far as we have 🤯

    • @easportsaxb8057
      @easportsaxb8057 2 года назад +1

      I'm pretty sure he did go to Tasmania, not sure he saw the thylacine tho. Thylacines are slightly larger on average than Falkland wolves and Tasmania is much larger (over 5 times larger) than the total area of the Falkland islands.

    • @____________838
      @____________838 Год назад

      What Darwin was referring to was that it was the only four legged critter on the island.

  • @lorisperfetto6021
    @lorisperfetto6021 Год назад +2

    Sad. Bring them back

  • @grandmasteryoda6717
    @grandmasteryoda6717 7 месяцев назад +1

    I wonder if these could be brought back to a certain extent through cloning. Take a maned wolf, their closest living relatives, as a surrogate mother and try to bring them back.

  • @reynaldoflores4522
    @reynaldoflores4522 Год назад +3

    The fates of the Falkland islands wolf, the Tasmanian tiger, the Great auk, etc. etc .
    The same stories of the boundless avarice and ignorance of humans!!!

  • @rolfwelsch8570
    @rolfwelsch8570 2 года назад +5

    human is an ignorend beast.

  • @Sebastian-fk3gs
    @Sebastian-fk3gs Год назад +2

    Colonists when they see a rare and beautiful endemic species of animal living on a desolate island in the middle of the ocean and just minding it's own business:😡😡😡🤬🤬

  • @keithcorrigan658
    @keithcorrigan658 2 года назад +3

    Humans have only been in America for 20.000 years ? I don't think so ! 🙈💗🙊🌍😖

  • @Lee.Willcox
    @Lee.Willcox Год назад +1

    These domesticated wolves were used by fishermen from the mainland to dive in and catch stray fish that had been wounded by miss spent spears. Every fish was precious. As the Falkland's were so close to the mainland, only some 250 miles, the fishermen with the aid of their DOGS took longer and longer fishing round trips. Some of the kanine were taken away by currents off the shores yet made it to land. They thrived there and their offspring although feral still had the domesticated mindset. Then the Americans came, skinned them all and like all the green bottles sitting on the wall, there were 0 Falkland Wolves left upon the shaw 😫 Beginning and end of story.

  • @RamonG60
    @RamonG60 Год назад +4

    Ist shameful like they did it to the dodo ...I can cry about destroying mother earth and his animal's

  • @wanoneone6985
    @wanoneone6985 Год назад +2

    other than tasmanian tiger, passenger pigeon and dodo bird. now i know there is another animal also extinct by european settlers.

    • @waragque
      @waragque 11 месяцев назад

      Why did the thylacine gone extinct in the Papua and mainland Australia?

  • @user-qt1oy3we7e
    @user-qt1oy3we7e Месяц назад

    Not Las Malvinas. The Islanders do not want to be part of Argentina. The first recorded landing 1690, was by an English ship.

  • @occidentadvocate.9759
    @occidentadvocate.9759 Год назад +3

    Why didn't they just put them on a few of the Islands in the Falklands that are uninhabited? Shame.

  • @redtobertshateshandles
    @redtobertshateshandles 2 года назад +8

    Bummer. Like the Thylacine in Tasmania. Bounty?? It's like killing someone's dog for $5.00.

    • @willempasterkamp862
      @willempasterkamp862 Год назад

      hm, killing 20 will earn someone a 100 box on a daily base ; not bad.

  • @Godzilla00X
    @Godzilla00X Год назад +1

    Poor wolf, too good for this world

  • @PalmersTradingPost
    @PalmersTradingPost Год назад +2

    Humans are so evil. Why do we destroy all these wonderful and unique creatures. It's pathetic. 😢

  • @carlelliter1532
    @carlelliter1532 Год назад

    This is a sad story.

  • @Khelim.o
    @Khelim.o Год назад +1

    Now i wonder how penguins taste

  • @jahmah519
    @jahmah519 2 года назад +2

    How many species have become extinct because of us, we probably done more than that asteroid, are we the actual thing?

  • @vamcorpenterprises
    @vamcorpenterprises Год назад

    0:04 i thought he said "british captain, jon tron"

  • @laleema908
    @laleema908 11 месяцев назад +1

    Sad...

  • @aprilguyguyon9169
    @aprilguyguyon9169 Год назад +1

    Nice infos. on new animals of othet countries but i don't vote for people of the past who are too greedy enough to hunt to extinction animals they presume to be harmful to them i hope lots are still surviving today

  • @mcaskil
    @mcaskil 2 года назад

    u r from sri lanka right? is everything ok there?

  • @raphlvlogs271
    @raphlvlogs271 2 года назад +3

    what other endemic species do the Falkland islands have?

  • @arefeshghi
    @arefeshghi Год назад +4

    This video just shows how stupid humans can be!

  • @ARGamingSFB260
    @ARGamingSFB260 Год назад

    How to contact you?

  • @manolodlospavos
    @manolodlospavos 2 года назад +3

    puzzel fragmented dna together and clone em.

  • @mystikmind2005
    @mystikmind2005 Год назад +2

    I do not know what this obsession for calling foxes wolves is all about? And this is by no means the only example of this idiocy. Even in this example it is stated as being no threat to sheep, and when is a wolf no threat to sheep? When it is a FOX !

  • @johnmurdoch8534
    @johnmurdoch8534 Год назад +1

    Why not clone a pop of these

  • @retrogaminggenesis6102
    @retrogaminggenesis6102 Год назад

    Which islands?

  • @naveensilva7671
    @naveensilva7671 3 месяца назад +1

    How many beautiful creatures we have lost because of those barbaric invaders from Europe. I am really disheartened 😢💔

  • @rherrera4177
    @rherrera4177 Год назад +2

    The early settlers of all continents had very little foresight of their actions. Butcher it, slaughter, shoot

  • @koba0798
    @koba0798 5 дней назад

    grim story. humans not even once

  • @samrizzardi2213
    @samrizzardi2213 2 года назад +18

    "DNA studies confirmed it was a wolf and its closest relative was the maned wolf".... which isn't a wolf....

    • @indyreno2933
      @indyreno2933 2 года назад +9

      Actually, maned wolves are still wolves, wolves and grey wolves are not the same thing, a wolf is any dog that is depicted larger than either a fox, a jackal (including the coyote), or a wild species with the word "dog" in its name, therefore, the Ethiopian Golden Wolf (Flavocyon simensis), Common Golden Wolf (Flavocyon simensis), White Wolf (Canis albus), Sea Wolf (Canis crassodon), Eastern Wolf (Canis lycaon), Red Wolf (Canis rufus), and Pale-Footed Wolf (Canis pallipes) are all wolves too, wolves are not a taxonomically defined group of dogs, they are only distinguished from other dogs such as foxes, jackals, and wild species with the word "dog" in their name, usually by their larger body size, wolves are a polyphyletic group as there are living and extinct genera of dogs with species called wolves.

    • @samrizzardi2213
      @samrizzardi2213 2 года назад +4

      @@indyreno2933 Citation needed (as usual when it comes to you)

    • @lukedarsey4134
      @lukedarsey4134 2 года назад

      @@indyreno2933 thank you for taking the time to explain that. Most people think their specialists in the chat. Some ( u) are... Much appreciated

    • @AegleCreations
      @AegleCreations  2 года назад +3

      Thank you for the detailed explanation!

    • @samrizzardi2213
      @samrizzardi2213 2 года назад

      @@lukedarsey4134 The guy's a hack. Literally no taxonomist recognises "white wolves" and "sea wolves" as separate species, and the Latin name "Flavocyon" is just made up.