It was hard explaining during my childhood why I hate childrens day celebrated at school. Even my teachers admonished me several times, just for raising such things about the dummy Gandhi family. I Feel relieved to have answers for my bigoted perspective.
Watch channels like (hyperquest),(praveen mohan) and (abhijeet chavda) to know more about our great historic,scientific culture(sanatana). 🙏 🙏 🙏🙏 And (sham sharma show),(aktk)(opindia) to know reality of shaikh-ul-arism.😢 Spread these channels to all hindus through shares, comments and subscribes to make them aware of their culture and the danger on them.🙏🙏.😢
Sorry to say... In a country like India Changes are really delayed... We just need a fast transformation at all cost... Otherwise We can't be at par with the world... It's good Changes are happening in our History books and Those Americans are insecure of it 😂😂
Dear Mr. Chavda, I was born in 1950. I served in the Indian Army Medical Corps and in my life, have seen, been to and appreciated the significance of most of the areas you speak of. It took me till around 2000, before I came to understand and strongly believe based on available references to facts that the Nehru years were a disaster and the Nehru Gandhi family may have been detrimental for India. I may be wrong or there may be many who feel so. There is always a sense of regret, when I think about it. Hopefully, the country will have a more equitable future. Thank you for your efforts. I enjoy listening to your detailed evaluations. Shashi.
DR.Rajaram PANTULU These facts should be given wide publicity especially to all sitting MPs and MLAs as well as all politicians, and the youth of our nation ,.JAI HIND.
This is outrageous, we have never been given these information in school books or anywhere. Our first PM of independent India, had broken the backbone of our country. My perspective towards him changed today after watching this video.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China) which was already a member. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
How stupid! Nehru and his first cabinet literally created India. This idea that India was going to be offered a seat and would actually have gotten it is remarkably stupid. Russia and the HK would never have agreed. All it would have done was piss off China and ruin our relations with the USSR.
Literally that was his biggest mistake and my region arunachal pradesh is facing aggression of China for decades now although I live in Assam at the moment. My maternal family lives in arunachal
What else would have happen when we were being ruled by the psycho leaders... They sought to seek that India is their territory and wants to set some so called pillars of peace! Peace never comes until we are powerful enough... Our Political system is still Handicapped by the old British systems... We deserve an updated systems for future 😤
*by chatgpt* *Why did nehru reject veto power in UN ? Favouring china over india* *Answer by chatgpt:-* It is not accurate to say that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, rejected the veto power in the United Nations in favor of China over India. In fact, Nehru was a strong advocate for India's inclusion in the United Nations and worked to ensure that India had a prominent role in the organization. However, he did not believe that any country, including India, should have veto power in the UN Security Council. Nehru believed that veto power would give too much power to any one country and could be misused to protect narrow national interests at the expense of global peace and security. He also believed that the UN should be an inclusive organization that worked to promote the collective interests of all member states. Nehru's stance on veto power was not influenced by his relationship with China. In fact, China was not a permanent member of the UN Security Council until 1971, many years after Nehru's death in 1964. Nehru's position on veto power was based on his belief in the principles of democracy, justice, and international cooperation. _______________________________________ Why should I trust this man more who has feeling and political biases rather than a bot who totally works on data and information??
I learned so much from this video. I’m American. I didn’t even know that India and Bharat were the same. I thought Nehru was some genius technocrat. There’s so much history that my school never taught me.
it was his way of signaling india as this noble caregiver. which we are. We have donated a lot for people everywhere we go sacrificed a lot shared our culture without forcing it. but it shouldn't come at the cost of security of the citizens. Indian citizens now face security threat because of his virtue signaling words. and not actions.
If anyone doubts that after having good qualifications ...Why nehru was a living blunder...Just observe Rahul Gandhi...Rahul Gandhi is rebirth of Shri Nehru actually....
Rahul Gandhi entered Harvard University due to the courtesy of Hindujas one of the major donors to the university Never passed any exam His degree in some other name and the reason “due to the threat to his life”
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
4:41 I like the Term "SELECTED "because he was not elected as most of the democracies has and now the Congress says that the democracy is in Danger in India .😌😌😌😌😌
I feel so let down, my grandfather died as a freedom fighter. I feel so let down. I'm glad at least now people are taking courage to speak the truth and bring facts in front of common citizens. Thank you for your research and bringing out such informative videos.
*by chatgpt* *Why did nehru reject veto power in UN ? Favouring china over india* *Answer by chatgpt:-* It is not accurate to say that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, rejected the veto power in the United Nations in favor of China over India. In fact, Nehru was a strong advocate for India's inclusion in the United Nations and worked to ensure that India had a prominent role in the organization. However, he did not believe that any country, including India, should have veto power in the UN Security Council. Nehru believed that veto power would give too much power to any one country and could be misused to protect narrow national interests at the expense of global peace and security. He also believed that the UN should be an inclusive organization that worked to promote the collective interests of all member states. Nehru's stance on veto power was not influenced by his relationship with China. In fact, China was not a permanent member of the UN Security Council until 1971, many years after Nehru's death in 1964. Nehru's position on veto power was based on his belief in the principles of democracy, justice, and international cooperation. _______________________________________ Why should I trust this man more who has feeling and political biases rather than a bot who totally works on data and information??
@@prateeksharma6706 I have read this on a different platform. But Chatgpt, also has biases based on its algorithms which are influenced by its programmers. Ask it any question based on any woke idea, and see how it promotes western degeneracy to the world.
@@prateeksharma6706 Nehru's ideology ka kya kare hum humare pass veto nhi h Nehru chutiya tha kashmir nhi h Nehru chutiya tha tha Balochistan nhi h aaj bhi vaha pe problems h Hyderabad mein bhi problems h u dumb ass ye Bot sirf ussi data pe kaam karega jo iske pass hoga Abhijit Chavda sir has a thinking he reads books more than u ever can and than make he makes a opinion so i believe him more than a bot who can't decide what's right or wrong 😂
@@prateeksharma6706 AI has bias too. And do you think the data that is fed to train it is free from bias also? Since when did an unfinished artificial bot become a credible source of information? Ask ChatGPT to list out the sources it's basing the opinion on. Then check the ratio of hard data backed evidence to opinion pieces.
Abhijit sir the way you are continously experimenting things and evolving in the youtube space is just outstanding. From just speaking in front of a mic to improvement in thumbnails to extraordinary thumbnails to better video editing to sound effects to various camera angles to storytelling videos like this one. You are worth an inspiration. Even new age youtubers do not have this much passion and determination. Always thankful that we have a well read professor like you to guide the country's youth to correct history and deliver it like a gigachad. Wishing you good luck👍
Sir, one more point to be noted. Nehru divided the Nagas ancestral homeland and it's people between India and Myanmar. Also, it was Nehru who split Naga community in India into Nagaland, part of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam State.🙏
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Gandhi was a british agent, just like Nehru. They weren't incompetent or made these blunders by accident. The British played their hand smart. Even today, Indians worship these traitors.
Gandhi is biggest villain for Bharath who made Nehru prime minister of India, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Combined All princely states and formed a Bharath.. Nehru made a biggest Shit with Kashmir..
Sir it’s very much depressing listening all those facts and losses of our Bharat Mata…. But Thank you very much for bringing the real face of nehru Loved the way this video was structured and keep bringing more like this and keep growing
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which was already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 I would have respected him if what he did worked but atlast all he did was to win Nobel peace prize. One blunder can be called a coincidence and is understandable but the uncountable blunders of Nehru and how he lived shows how incompetent he was aa a leader.
Nehru was selected ninicoompoop unfit to be a PM of nation. His daughter was a bit better but also a vote bank politician and a fascist by nature. The rest of Nehru's descendants are simply unintelligent figure heads
Every incidence mentioned is loaded with facts. And presented in a chronological order with total clarity. It keep me hooked till the end of the video. Thank you Abhijit Sir for your efforts and bringing the truth to light.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Chavada ji, thanks for the education. This is heart breaking for me who grew up in the Caribbean being of indendentured Labourers shipped from Bharat by Colonia UK. Can you imagine, there was an artist named Sidfhu from Penal in SouthbTrinidad, who was called by mandirs ACRISS Trinidad to pain Gandhi, Nehru and later Indira on the walls. Gandhi photo stood side be side to devas at homes and mandirs. To learn Nehru lost 12 - 0 on voting in Congress election. I have learnt now that Nehru in fact made Pakistan and Kashmir . I am taking down the old photos on the walls. raviji, Trinidad and Tobago.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Wow, this is mind-blowing knowledge, thanks for educating the youth Mr Chavda sir 🙏 We would not get this knowledge anywhere else. You are doing a great job putting history in young people's minds. Keep them coming!!!
I would’ve have still watched it if it was an hour long. Please share a details or follow up videos to this content. Thank you for the amazing work you do!
When a common person makes mistake then only that person has to bear the consequences but when intellectual makes one... then entire society has to pay for it as we are paying for 'Mr Magnificent PM the Nehru'
Great PM was not intellectual. It seems he couldn't even pass his college. He was awarded a special degree cause they didn't fail students at that time. Or he would not even have gotten a graduation.
Very very informative.For the first time i have heard such a beautiful exhaustive information about a person who is so well sung in India particularly in political circles.He ensured India remains weak in every respect not only to UK but even to Pak&CPC's regime .His actions/stand are the architects of today's main global problems of India.He did succeed in doing perhaps what he was destined to.
One of the most important lessons about Nehru’s blunders. What a shameful excuse of a leader Nehru was! 🤦♂️ Nehru seemed to have had a deep inferiority complex. Disgraceful family. Thank god it is all coming to the fore thanks to sm. Time to start fixing those blunders. Jai Bharat! 💪🙏🕉🚩🇮🇳
He didn't just have a a deep inferiority complex but actually was part of the standard European imperialist practice of continuing colonization of nations/civilizations even after physically quitting the former colonies by placing corrupt local pawns!! This was done by the French/Europeans & Americans heavily in Africa too!!
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 You also don' have any idea have on American/western society!! Worse!! you confuse India's Dharma with religions like Christianity/Islam!! Also, Europe has de-christianized but USA was very much a hardliner Christian society when Nehru was in power!! People like you are colonized and have no India of this nation or the world!!
I think this is one of your best videos. I heard some of this mentioned by my parents growing up, but I learned so much more here. I watch your podcasts and am watching your history course. When you lay out facts like this one by one at a fast pace, it’s the best. I am an engineer, grew up in the west so didn’t learn Indian history. On visits to India, growing up I heard stories from my grandfather who was a freedom fighter. His older brother spent years in the Andaman’s cellular jail. Learning facts from this video pains me, but your attitude is right - we should not be emotional. I think every Indian person and every western journalist at least should watch this. Our people allowed bad leadership and bad management. Your videos give me hope. Thank you for your work.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 I agree that Nehru was well-wisher of India but when he needs to take that huge decision he should have discussed in the assembly. While ROC was part of UNSC there was no threat to India infact it had nice relationship with India. The problem raised when China went in the hands of PROC.
it feels deep pain to realise what has been done with my motherland in times when it required apt and to the point action. it feels very sad to the heart 💔
@@gauravshah89 neh. still a long way to go. seems modi has caught the virus of 'santushtikaran' of a particular community which will never support him no matter what he does , same as cong did their 'tushtikaran' since eternity. modi 3.0 needs to be inspired by yogiji and not the other way around.
So much of this I never knew, and I am almost 50 years old. Thanks Mr Chawda, such an eye opener. If I was a descendant of this Nehru I would be ashamed to be seen publicly
I have come to believe that Nehru was basically Rahul Gandhi in 1947. But I would like to question my previous generation, HOW THE HELL DID YOU GUYS BELIEVE IN HIM??????
Bcz lack of technology bro today many of us believed them in childhood are now getting to know their reality and there are many people in my near villages still they keep indira bandhi rajiv gandhi sonia ghandi photos in home and worship them as god and keeps their new born child name too😢😅😅
What a fantastic narration by Abhijeet as a senior citizen now we realise how we as a nation have not prospered like other nations. China and Pakistan always used bullying tactics to intimidate India demoralising the Indian army and forces. Nehru The Villain of India
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Sir, you are doing a great work..hats off to you and thank you so much for opening our eyes to the reality of Nehru and utmost unfortunate situations that our Bharat had to face unnecessarily
Brilliant! Thank you so much for bringing this out in the open - something that was much needed. Request you to please bring out a detailed podcast also on this issue - all the wrong history taught to us in school has to be corrected.
It is really painful listening this episode and knowing blunders of Mr. Nehru…. Pakistan and China must build Nehru statues for the help he had done to them
Dear Dalailama ji {Tibet} excuse India for not supporting you while you were being in attack by the rouge China. China Russia and have become bane for the world.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
👿 i am experiencing rocket's engine thrust in my viens and flowing with hot boiled blood after listining to you sir .hatsoff to your work....Lets make india pride again😤💪🇮🇳
While I say Mr Gandhi and Nehru has destroyed India and it’s culture to a maximum extent, India thanks all all Hero’s and Heroines who have made India of the present day, including Gandhi and Nehru. It seems that Mr Gandhi and Nehru were more cowards and ungrateful,cunning and anti Hindus and anti Bharat.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Sir, I just want to take a moment to say that I love the way your last few videos are produced, the increased quality is clearly visible. Keep up the good work sir, I appreciate every single video.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Some people talk only about the ills of yesterday. Why can't people talk of today's problems By the way read the Discovery of India before making comments
@@Kbhaskaran15 sir Idk how u ended up on this video if you're not a dynamic fan of history. Khair, plz go thru some famous videos of Abhijit sir and u will get ur answer inform of correct information about the discovery of India, which is full of misinformation and diversions of Sanatan culture against what is the actual reality. I will pray for you to get better guidance in this respect. Jai Hind 🙏🏻🇮🇳🕉❤
Thanks for making this video. This really is an eye-opener for everyone. What really saddens is that, even after all these blunders, Nehru (and Gandhi) is still praised as a great freedom fighter. Its high time, everyone is made aware of these things and celebs like you talking about it creates greater awareness. We stand with you.
each word said by Abhijit sir is true & boils my blood to limits ....i had a image of Nehru as a man who took some wrong decisions but also took some right decisions regarding industrialisation , building iit's & pushing ISRO & atomic programme but Nations security is first ... land & people are most important & foremost thing.
Atomic program initiates after defeated from China in 62 war । Other wise neharu believe india is peaceful country we don't need army we need only police ।
Excellent excellent powerpacked presentation ! An eye opener indeed... PLEASE SHARE THIS EXTENSIVELY... ABHIJITJI, PLEASE CAN YOU ALSO DO THIS IN HINDI FOR WIDER AUDIENCE? THANK YOU ❤
Hello sir... Amazing explanation with facts and figures 🙌💯🤝 Ur new subscriber...i am class 12th humanities student and came after watching ur interview with Ranveer...✨
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
We will pay with a lot of blood, someday, just because of one man and his lineage and most of it will be shed between the fight of two factions of what was Akhand Bharat, in history...
Really admire the work you are putting into educating the young minds about the falsehoods taught to us by schools where we did no less than worship some of the worst men responsible for India's downfall. It's one thing to forgive them of their monstrous deeds and another to f**king worship them generations through( even in the new millennia). Hats off to your constant effort in presenting the atrocities committed by these individuals factually.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 Totally agree with your points. I have taken my time researching a bit on the topic after I showed this video to my friend who identified the video to be showing just one side of the coin. I have been following Mr. Chavda since a year perhaps and found his content to be factual and reliant. But lately there’s been a clear right orientation and aggressive nationalism in his recent videos. Perhaps I should know better than to cloud my views based off of one video, which is kinda ironic in a sense that Mr. Chavda himself urges us to challenge textbooks and views presented by mainstream media.
Nehru being PM of India at the eve of Independence (that too unfairly elected as interim gov. results choosed Vallabhai Patel as PM) is not a good choice His Blunders 1 Kashmir got half 2 Coco Island sell 3 Ignored veto in 1952 and 1955 4 Lose in War 5 Lose of Aksai Chin 6 Indus Rover Treaty
Kindly produce such videos in state languages so that your important videos reach a wider audience who does not understand English. People of India must know these facts. Thank you very much.
Goa is sadly famous for its Inquisition, which is contrary to humanity as much as to commerce. The Portuguese monks deluded us into believing that the Indian populace was worshipping the Devil, while it is they who served him.” - IS- Voltaire The thought of Goa automatically elevates one’s mood. The idyllic setting of Goa is loved by foreign visitors as well as native Indians. All of these picturesque locales, happy people, and enthusiastic culture, however, have a tragic history. India gained its independence in 1947, but for Goa, it was December 19, 1961, after 451 years of Portuguese rule. Goa was one of three Portuguese colonies in India, the other two being Daman and Diu. The three territories were captured by India in 1961 and freed from the tyranny of the Portuguese. Nehru’s political lethargy Back in December 2021 PM Modi stated, “This year as we celebrate sixty years of Independent Goa, I want to say, had Sardar Patel been allowed to frame a policy for Goa like Hyderabad or Junagarh, Goa would not have to wait after fifteen years of the Indian independence to liberate itself.” There’s no doubt that Nehru had nothing but despise and disregard for the satyagrahis who struggled hard for Goa’s liberation. Nehru always tried to carve a ‘holier than thou’ personality of his, by putting at stake the national interests. Nehru wanted an untarnished image and that’s why he didn’t use force to occupy Goa, which rightfully belonged to India. It was due to Nehru’s administrative inadequacy and incapability that freedom fighters of Goa, had to bear the brunt of Portugal rule for 15 more years. Goan Inquisition Inquisition was started by Pope Lucius III in 1184 CE, the Goanese Inquisition is a dark blot in Indian history. It is infamous as it was aimed at torturing, harassment and brutalizing and for persecuting ‘non-believers’. It was in 1545, the Jesuit ‘saint’ (Yes a saint!!) Francis Xavier wrote to his Roman masters requesting the Inquisition of Goa. The same Saint whose physical remains are kept in a famous church in Goa and thousands of ignorant Hindus pay respects to him. That’s sad and disturbing to know that how conveniently Hindus have been brainwashed. Sadly they have been made to forget the brutalities inflicted upon them and are encouraged to worship the one who instigated it. The Goanese inquisition was finally implemented by the Portuguese colonizers in 1560 and lasted until the year 1812. Innumerable people were burnt, tormented or murdered using various methods- most of them native Hindus. Discussion of this is now considered taboo due to the current political climate. A man who despised Hindus and invited colonizers to commit atrocities against them has been declared a ‘saint’. It is unfortunate, that many Christians in Goa find their affinity with the Portuguese rather than with their motherland. They have forgotten the brutal history of persecution their ancestors underwent where they were forcibly converted. Nehru’s political naivety and Goan territory acquisition Nehru wanted to use diplomatic channels to further the cause in order to protect and advance his image as a peace-loving global leader. On December 11, 1961, after realizing that Nehru’s diplomatic maneuvering with his allies failed. His close aide VK Krishna Menon made the decision to send the army to Goa. MENON MADE THE SUDDEN DECISION TO USE THE ARMY BECAUSE HE WAS RUNNING AGAINST JB KRIPLANI IN THE 1962 LOK SABHA ELECTIONS FROM NORTH BOMBAY. HIS PLAN TO CAPTURE GOA PAID OFF, AS HE WON THE ELECTIONS BY DEFEATING KRIPLANI. IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS MENON, NOT NEHRU, WHO WORKED TO ASSIST GOA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS. It has to be understood that Nehru seeking constant validation from the western nations, did him especially India, no good. On February 27, 1950, the then-Nehru-led government requested that the Portuguese negotiate over the subjugated territories. However, because of white supremacy and dominancy, they asserted that its territory on the Indian subcontinent wasn’t a colony. They claimed that it was a part of metropolitan Portugal; hence its transfer was ‘non-negotiable.’ They went on to say that India had not been a republic since the time they had captured Goa. The Portuguese capture of Goa dates back to Adil Shahis reign. Post India’s independence, Portuguese ruled the territories of Goa, South Konkan, and Daman and Diu for about 450 years. Rajmohan Gandhi, Gandhi’s grandson, described in his book a meeting between top leaders concerning Goa’s situation in 1950. “With tightly closed eyes, Patel was hearing all the points which were being made. He rose up to interject suddenly and said, “Want to enter Goa, it’s a matter of mere two hours”. However, Nehru was to decline this proposition and Patel did not interject thence.” Nehru, being the best at what he did, did not allow the army to free Goa from foreign rule. He also openly opposed other Indian revolutionaries who wanted to join the Goa liberation. The following newspaper excerpt explains how the AICC actively prevented the Goan inquisition. It read, “Any entry into Goan soil by Indian Nationals will be inappropriate and even individual Satyagrahas should be avoided”. All this was done deliberately at a time, when the efforts of the freedom fighters were bearing fruits. Conclusion Although Nehru wanted to use diplomatic channels first, why did he pander to foreign forces so much? For a matter that concerns an Indian territory, why should an independent nation seek support from other western nations? Why did he muzzle the voices of Indian freedom fighters in Goa? Indian Air Force bombed the Dabolim airport because of the bold initiative by former Defense Minister Menon. The Indian army entered Goa on the 18th and on the following day from the south. The Portuguese army surrendered as a result of the brave efforts of the Indian forces. However, even after so much diplomatic pandering, Nehru’s efforts didn’t pay off. Following the successful acquisition of Goa by the Indian army, many European nations, the USA, China, and the UK targeted India. As expected, these nations targeted India in the UN to stop the Indian army’s operations in Goa. Due to their innate hatred towards their former colony, the West did not spare any effort to damage India’s prospects. It was, therefore, pure political naiveté on Nehru’s part to expect help or support from the Western nations. It’s not surprising that Nehru’s administration and governance failed India and Indians, on numerous occasions. We ceded our part of Indian Territory to China because of his ‘political expertise’ (pun intended!)- Aksai Chin. Our nations’ strategic interests have been compromised by Congress on more than one occasion: the 26/11 attacks, the Commonwealth scam, etc. Nehru clan has collectively failed Hindus on numerous fronts, and Hindus need to understand this. Every political party should understand that their own interests cannot trump the interests of citizens. Likewise, the people of the nation should realize what is good and in their own collective interests and not be gullible to the claims of others.
I am reading comments and i am so happy to see us Indians united ! Team India - lets learn from this original pappu and keep the jr. Pappu out on 2024. Time we grab what is ours. Hell, 1 in every 6 person is ours.. LET US TAKE OUR RIGHT BACK!
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
What I don't understand is that why are we not taught these things in school? Rather these politicians are rather glorified like anything! If we can study about the battles of Ashoka, what went wrong, what went right and the atrocities that were committed during it, why can't we study all of this?
Its surprising how optimistic USA was about India in those days. Nehru's holier than though & impractical decisions which was only good for boosting his own image and against national interest may have caused disenchantment or dissolution of any hope of India as a useful democratic centre in east.
Abhijit ji,Pls record this episode in Hindi, wanted to share with my relatives which are not well versed in English. I know it's lots of work to record every episode in 2 languages but this episode worth it.
This is just a brief explanation. There are lot of reasons why india was at its worst years from 1946 to 1962 and everything points towards mr.nehru's govt. Hope I see more video's on this particular topic in future @abhijitchavda sir.thank you
Nehru like b3trayers of India is a sham3 to our nation , loved mini videos like this about the topics which is to be told to every Indian. Nice sir 🙌🏻.
It was hard explaining during my childhood why I hate childrens day celebrated at school. Even my teachers admonished me several times, just for raising such things about the dummy Gandhi family. I Feel relieved to have answers for my bigoted perspective.
Neku apudey idea undha bro? I didn't know all this back then. Only in last 2 to 3 years, I started to join the dots.
He started it while he was alive.
How to pay in comment ???
How did you put a pay chat ?
Watch channels like (hyperquest),(praveen mohan) and (abhijeet chavda) to know more about our great historic,scientific culture(sanatana). 🙏 🙏 🙏🙏
And (sham sharma show),(aktk)(opindia) to know reality of shaikh-ul-arism.😢
Spread these channels to all hindus through shares, comments and subscribes to make them aware of their culture and the danger on them.🙏🙏.😢
I’m ashamed to have admired and called him Chacha Nehru in School.
It’s about time our History Text books get the facts.
He is that bhosdiwala chacha
He was chacha but a b$diwala chacha
I had become chacha Nehru in a fancy dress during my primary school days, my childhood has been a lie. I am ashamed too.
British ki chatne aur juhujuri karne wala chaha chaha
@@ritvik8773 average left winger common L
How could a PM gift parts of India to other nations? How was that even allowed India wasn't his personal property.
Nehru was also a pappu. But there was no social media to expose him like rahul gandhi.
Completely agree 👍
Oh good lord I feel so scared even thinking what if Pappu becomes PM
I thing pappu is copy of nehru
Best comment !
DNA mei hai inke lagta hai 😂
ITS TIME TO CHANGE OUR HISTORY BOOKS AND DHRUV RATHI'S BRAIN
AND ALSO AKASH BANERJEE(DESHDROHI)
😂😂😂
Rathee is funded by anti national forces.
Sorry to say... In a country like India Changes are really delayed... We just need a fast transformation at all cost... Otherwise We can't be at par with the world... It's good Changes are happening in our History books and Those Americans are insecure of it 😂😂
Dhruv ke political videos katahi chutiyapa hei
Is Dhruv Rathi a real name of the Turd 💩 hiding in human body 🤷🏻♂️
Dear Mr. Chavda, I was born in 1950. I served in the Indian Army Medical Corps and in my life, have seen, been to and appreciated the significance of most of the areas you speak of. It took me till around 2000, before I came to understand and strongly believe based on available references to facts that the Nehru years were a disaster and the Nehru Gandhi family may have been detrimental for India. I may be wrong or there may be many who feel so. There is always a sense of regret, when I think about it. Hopefully, the country will have a more equitable future. Thank you for your efforts. I enjoy listening to your detailed evaluations. Shashi.
Thank you for your service sir . We , the next gen won't let the nation down , I promise
I am Loving All Your Documentaries
1. Genghis Khan
2. Abraham Lincoln vs MK Gandhi
3. Nehru blunders
Thank you Abhijit Ji
Waiting for More Such Videos
Exactly. Finally we are getting the truth and not the political interests of the Gandhi family.
DR.Rajaram PANTULU These facts should be given wide publicity especially to all sitting MPs and MLAs as well as all politicians, and the youth of our nation ,.JAI HIND.
This is outrageous, we have never been given these information in school books or anywhere. Our first PM of independent India, had broken the backbone of our country.
My perspective towards him changed today after watching this video.
Well people have been telling this for long time
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China) which was already a member. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
How stupid! Nehru and his first cabinet literally created India. This idea that India was going to be offered a seat and would actually have gotten it is remarkably stupid. Russia and the HK would never have agreed. All it would have done was piss off China and ruin our relations with the USSR.
@vishvaa bushan lol like bjp did wonders in karnataka that people will vote for them😂😂😂 u think people r fool.?
It's a fabricated story. Nehru is a hero, Modi is a criminal. BjP is a fascist party.
Seriously, I felt very bad for my Bharat 😢 after listening this...
Literally that was his biggest mistake and my region arunachal pradesh is facing aggression of China for decades now although I live in Assam at the moment. My maternal family lives in arunachal
What else would have happen when we were being ruled by the psycho leaders... They sought to seek that India is their territory and wants to set some so called pillars of peace!
Peace never comes until we are powerful enough...
Our Political system is still Handicapped by the old British systems... We deserve an updated systems for future 😤
😮
Tharki Lehru provided rice to invading Chinese army from Assam..so they could easily captured Tibet.
u call it mistake to things which r done knowingly! i call it sin
Hi beautiful
oh f*ck! I couldn't watch this entire video, this is so painful to see how one man destroyed our country and people still celebrate him.
भाई तुमने मेरी दिल की बात बोल दी
Rahul gandhi, neharu, vinci will be another gem to kill and destroy India further more if our fucking noob population get him back to power !
Same bc
still they are pushing to destroy india , by a pappu.
*by chatgpt*
*Why did nehru reject veto power in UN ? Favouring china over india*
*Answer by chatgpt:-*
It is not accurate to say that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, rejected the veto power in the United Nations in favor of China over India.
In fact, Nehru was a strong advocate for India's inclusion in the United Nations and worked to ensure that India had a prominent role in the organization. However, he did not believe that any country, including India, should have veto power in the UN Security Council.
Nehru believed that veto power would give too much power to any one country and could be misused to protect narrow national interests at the expense of global peace and security. He also believed that the UN should be an inclusive organization that worked to promote the collective interests of all member states.
Nehru's stance on veto power was not influenced by his relationship with China. In fact, China was not a permanent member of the UN Security Council until 1971, many years after Nehru's death in 1964. Nehru's position on veto power was based on his belief in the principles of democracy, justice, and international cooperation.
_______________________________________
Why should I trust this man more who has feeling and political biases rather than a bot who totally works on data and information??
I learned so much from this video. I’m American. I didn’t even know that India and Bharat were the same. I thought Nehru was some genius technocrat. There’s so much history that my school never taught me.
Nehru was the biggest Idiot we Indians could ever have, all thanks to Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi so-called Mahatma or father of the nation.
it was his way of signaling india as this noble caregiver. which we are. We have donated a lot for people everywhere we go sacrificed a lot shared our culture without forcing it. but it shouldn't come at the cost of security of the citizens.
Indian citizens now face security threat because of his virtue signaling words. and not actions.
If anyone doubts that after having good qualifications ...Why nehru was a living blunder...Just observe Rahul Gandhi...Rahul Gandhi is rebirth of Shri Nehru actually....
Rahul is a sot just like his grandfather. Nehru is a shame for india, so is Rajiv and the aspiring con dreaming to be indias PM.
Rahul Gandhi entered Harvard University due to the courtesy of Hindujas one of the major donors to the university
Never passed any exam
His degree in some other name and the reason “due to the threat to his life”
That living blunder built iits, iims, aiims, bhava atomic research, Isro, green revolution
Rahul, fake Gandhi is carrying forward his ancestral legacy of being boot lickers of the British/west & other anti Hindu & anti India forces!!
And still millions is voting for him .
I am swelling with rage.
It is us who are brainwashed
Jaago Bharatiyo jaago
Shocked to know these. In childhood we were only told to call him chacha Nehru . . . the chacha who never had candies to nephews and nieces
Chacha ne aap sabhi logo ko chutiya banaya....🤣
Literally feel like crying after watching this.
Btw, great work Abhijit Sir. Keep it up.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
4:41 I like the Term "SELECTED "because he was not elected as most of the democracies has and now the Congress says that the democracy is in Danger in India .😌😌😌😌😌
Bhai Maine school ke history book mein bhi "selected" padha tha
jab us samay tak constitution hi nahi bana tha toh elections kaise ?
@Rishabh Asthana How did the CWC elections happen then?
How did the Muslim league win elections then? How did Cong win elections then?
@@vickymactian if only you would have taken the pain and studied some history...just search who won the last provisional elections under British rule
@Rishabh Asthana 🤣. I'm well aware of history. Your point was about elections, and all I did was respond to that. Now, please get your words sorted!
Abhijit is very decent and generous in addressing Nehru as Mr. Nehru,! I would instead him as a stooge of the British and TRAITOR!
🇩🇰
I feel so let down, my grandfather died as a freedom fighter. I feel so let down. I'm glad at least now people are taking courage to speak the truth and bring facts in front of common citizens. Thank you for your research and bringing out such informative videos.
For every blunder that nehru committed, m k gandhi is accountable equally. It is gandhi who made nehru PM undemocratically by misusing his influence.
Bhai both were clearly planted and agents
*by chatgpt*
*Why did nehru reject veto power in UN ? Favouring china over india*
*Answer by chatgpt:-*
It is not accurate to say that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, rejected the veto power in the United Nations in favor of China over India.
In fact, Nehru was a strong advocate for India's inclusion in the United Nations and worked to ensure that India had a prominent role in the organization. However, he did not believe that any country, including India, should have veto power in the UN Security Council.
Nehru believed that veto power would give too much power to any one country and could be misused to protect narrow national interests at the expense of global peace and security. He also believed that the UN should be an inclusive organization that worked to promote the collective interests of all member states.
Nehru's stance on veto power was not influenced by his relationship with China. In fact, China was not a permanent member of the UN Security Council until 1971, many years after Nehru's death in 1964. Nehru's position on veto power was based on his belief in the principles of democracy, justice, and international cooperation.
_______________________________________
Why should I trust this man more who has feeling and political biases rather than a bot who totally works on data and information??
@@prateeksharma6706 I have read this on a different platform. But Chatgpt, also has biases based on its algorithms which are influenced by its programmers. Ask it any question based on any woke idea, and see how it promotes western degeneracy to the world.
@@prateeksharma6706 Nehru's ideology ka kya kare hum humare pass veto nhi h Nehru chutiya tha kashmir nhi h Nehru chutiya tha tha Balochistan nhi h aaj bhi vaha pe problems h Hyderabad mein bhi problems h u dumb ass ye Bot sirf ussi data pe kaam karega jo iske pass hoga Abhijit Chavda sir has a thinking he reads books more than u ever can and than make he makes a opinion so i believe him more than a bot who can't decide what's right or wrong 😂
@@prateeksharma6706 AI has bias too. And do you think the data that is fed to train it is free from bias also? Since when did an unfinished artificial bot become a credible source of information? Ask ChatGPT to list out the sources it's basing the opinion on. Then check the ratio of hard data backed evidence to opinion pieces.
Thanks for correct historical information about which the post- 1947 Indians are not aware!
Abhijit sir the way you are continously experimenting things and evolving in the youtube space is just outstanding. From just speaking in front of a mic to improvement in thumbnails to extraordinary thumbnails to better video editing to sound effects to various camera angles to storytelling videos like this one. You are worth an inspiration. Even new age youtubers do not have this much passion and determination.
Always thankful that we have a well read professor like you to guide the country's youth to correct history and deliver it like a gigachad. Wishing you good luck👍
Sir, one more point to be noted.
Nehru divided the Nagas ancestral homeland and it's people between India and Myanmar.
Also, it was Nehru who split Naga community in India into Nagaland, part of Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam State.🙏
These facts fill my eyes with huge tear drops . Truth can never be hidden . Your expression is excellent 👌 🙏
I haven't even heard about this actions of mr. nehru. I was shocked to learn the truth. Thanks to Abijith sir.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Thanks
Nehru becoming PM was the biggest misfortune of Bharat and this happened purely because of flaw in Gandhi's character.
Gandhi was a loyal slave of the British & mostly a Muslim in almost all his actions!!
Lol, you believe this bs? Don't forget the ROC was still one of the permanent member, they will not vote for India to replace themself.
He tried to emulate mahatma gandhi his mentor. Little did he know that he was just idealistic. Thats what happens when u try to become sage 😂
Gandhi was a british agent, just like Nehru. They weren't incompetent or made these blunders by accident. The British played their hand smart. Even today, Indians worship these traitors.
Gandhi is biggest villain for Bharath who made Nehru prime minister of India, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Combined All princely states and formed a Bharath..
Nehru made a biggest Shit with Kashmir..
Shocked by the blunders of Mr. Nehru thanks to Abhijit for providing such a informative video.
not blunders. intentional.
Its ISI agent Modi BJP who made you SURRENDER to TMC goons.
I have never come across such a balanced & accurate narration!
My salute !
🙏
Brilliant sir
We want some more documentaries like this to show the reality to Indians
Sir it’s very much depressing listening all those facts and losses of our Bharat Mata….
But Thank you very much for bringing the real face of nehru
Loved the way this video was structured and keep bringing more like this and keep growing
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which was already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 I would have respected him if what he did worked but atlast all he did was to win Nobel peace prize.
One blunder can be called a coincidence and is understandable but the uncountable blunders of Nehru and how he lived shows how incompetent he was aa a leader.
A fabricated story. BjP is a fascist party.
Nehru was selected ninicoompoop unfit to be a PM of nation. His daughter was a bit better but also a vote bank politician and a fascist by nature. The rest of Nehru's descendants are simply unintelligent figure heads
Lol, you believe this bs? Don't forget the ROC was still one of the permanent member, they will not vote for India to replace themself.
Even after these himalayan blunders, India is firmly in the path of progress. Thanks to the resilience of Indian citizens. Jai Hind
Abhijit Sir's documentaries are the best. He's becoming more active now on YT. Sir You're the voice of India
Every incidence mentioned is loaded with facts. And presented in a chronological order with total clarity. It keep me hooked till the end of the video.
Thank you Abhijit Sir for your efforts and bringing the truth to light.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Chavada ji, thanks for the education. This is heart breaking for me who grew up in the Caribbean being of indendentured Labourers shipped from Bharat by Colonia UK. Can you imagine, there was an artist named Sidfhu from Penal in SouthbTrinidad, who was called by mandirs ACRISS Trinidad to pain Gandhi, Nehru and later Indira on the walls. Gandhi photo stood side be side to devas at homes and mandirs. To learn Nehru lost 12 - 0 on voting in Congress election.
I have learnt now that Nehru in fact made Pakistan and Kashmir .
I am taking down the old photos on the walls. raviji, Trinidad and Tobago.
Another fascinating and factually correct and compelling video by Shree Abhijit Chavda. Loved the video
Thousand pranam to you sir
Historians like you are the need of nation today.
Please shed some more light on real Bharat's history.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 stop spamming this comment 😑
Abhijit Ji- awesome chronology. Thanks for keeping this topic alive and educating the nation, so the future blunders can be Prevented.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
my heart pains everytime i hear about the deeds of Shri Shri nehru ji...............seriously how much pain did he cause to my motherland?!😢😢🙏🙏
@@gouravsharma7422 bhai gaali kyu de rhe ho?? Aur maine gyan kab dia???
@@debosmandasgupta3940 tumne gyan nhi diya pr vo de rha h 😅 Sarcastic
naam mai se Shri aur Ji hata de bro,
tujhe Anya ki kasam 🙂
@@KnightHawk2511 that's the sarcastic way sir calls him😂
Still you added shri n ji ??? He don’t deserve any of it .
Wow, this is mind-blowing knowledge, thanks for educating the youth Mr Chavda sir 🙏
We would not get this knowledge anywhere else. You are doing a great job putting history in young people's minds. Keep them coming!!!
I would’ve have still watched it if it was an hour long. Please share a details or follow up videos to this content. Thank you for the amazing work you do!
When a common person makes mistake then only that person has to bear the consequences but when intellectual makes one... then entire society has to pay for it as we are paying for 'Mr Magnificent PM the Nehru'
Hope our present government doesn't make any mistake so we and future generations don't suffer.😅
That's why we study history.
Lehru & Mo Gazi never made mistakes.
They plotted.
They conspired.
Againsts whom?
Againsts you & me
Great PM was not intellectual. It seems he couldn't even pass his college. He was awarded a special degree cause they didn't fail students at that time. Or he would not even have gotten a graduation.
not magnificent, "The greatest, most magnificent, Hand-Picked by Jesus Christ, Born Leader PM Nehru"
@@armanranjan5581 😂😂😂
Really an eye opening presentation. This needs to be taught to every child in schools.
Very very informative.For the first time i have heard such a beautiful exhaustive information about a person who is so well sung in India particularly in political circles.He ensured India remains weak in every respect not only to UK but even to Pak&CPC's regime
.His actions/stand are the architects of today's main global problems of India.He did succeed in doing perhaps what he was destined to.
One of the most important lessons about Nehru’s blunders. What a shameful excuse of a leader Nehru was! 🤦♂️ Nehru seemed to have had a deep inferiority complex. Disgraceful family. Thank god it is all coming to the fore thanks to sm. Time to start fixing those blunders. Jai Bharat! 💪🙏🕉🚩🇮🇳
He didn't just have a a deep inferiority complex but actually was part of the standard European imperialist practice of continuing colonization of nations/civilizations even after physically quitting the former colonies by placing corrupt local pawns!! This was done by the French/Europeans & Americans heavily in Africa too!!
@@rka-truthalwayswins5127 That is so true. Well noted! 👍💯
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 BS!! Nehru & Indira were Idiot, Islamo-leftist fascists & as Pappu as today's Pappu!!
@@harisbhai20 You also don' have any idea have on American/western society!! Worse!! you confuse India's Dharma with religions like Christianity/Islam!!
Also, Europe has de-christianized but USA was very much a hardliner Christian society when Nehru was in power!!
People like you are colonized and have no India of this nation or the world!!
I think this is one of your best videos. I heard some of this mentioned by my parents growing up, but I learned so much more here. I watch your podcasts and am watching your history course. When you lay out facts like this one by one at a fast pace, it’s the best. I am an engineer, grew up in the west so didn’t learn Indian history. On visits to India, growing up I heard stories from my grandfather who was a freedom fighter. His older brother spent years in the Andaman’s cellular jail. Learning facts from this video pains me, but your attitude is right - we should not be emotional. I think every Indian person and every western journalist at least should watch this. Our people allowed bad leadership and bad management. Your videos give me hope. Thank you for your work.
It is a matter of happiness that the country is still in existence under the leadership of these people.
Now we have good leadership. Don't let it go by voting for secular parties.
In the entire video I smiled only once, when you said ' MR. NEHRU PASSED AWAY '. I felt that he saved BHARATH after his death...
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 I agree that Nehru was well-wisher of India but when he needs to take that huge decision he should have discussed in the assembly.
While ROC was part of UNSC there was no threat to India infact it had nice relationship with India. The problem raised when China went in the hands of PROC.
There cannot be more clear presentation of uncle’s gifts to India. Thank you, Chavada
it feels deep pain to realise what has been done with my motherland in times when it required apt and to the point action. it feels very sad to the heart 💔
Y people like u will always b sad bcoz u don't have gand m dum to change
Real independence came in 2014. 1947 was 3rd wave of colonialism - the Congress colonialism.
@@gauravshah89 neh. still a long way to go. seems modi has caught the virus of 'santushtikaran' of a particular community which will never support him no matter what he does , same as cong did their 'tushtikaran' since eternity. modi 3.0 needs to be inspired by yogiji and not the other way around.
So much of this I never knew, and I am almost 50 years old. Thanks Mr Chawda, such an eye opener. If I was a descendant of this Nehru I would be ashamed to be seen publicly
I have come to believe that Nehru was basically Rahul Gandhi in 1947. But I would like to question my previous generation, HOW THE HELL DID YOU GUYS BELIEVE IN HIM??????
Bcz lack of technology bro today many of us believed them in childhood are now getting to know their reality and there are many people in my near villages still they keep indira bandhi rajiv gandhi sonia ghandi photos in home and worship them as god and keeps their new born child name too😢😅😅
The papers were told to publish what Nehru wanted
Hence people were unaware of the situation
Because he was selected not elected
Perspectives at the end..... thank you Abhijit chavda ❤..these videos should have millions of views
What a fantastic narration by Abhijeet as a senior citizen now we realise how we as a nation have not prospered like other nations. China and Pakistan always used bullying tactics to intimidate India demoralising the Indian army and forces. Nehru The Villain of India
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
I can't express the pain and anger I feel in my gut listening to all of this. All of future was put on stake as per his will.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 People like you were the reason why India was subjugated for 1000 years.
Sir, you are doing a great work..hats off to you and thank you so much for opening our eyes to the reality of Nehru and utmost unfortunate situations that our Bharat had to face unnecessarily
Brilliant!
Thank you so much for bringing this out in the open - something that was much needed.
Request you to please bring out a detailed podcast also on this issue - all the wrong history taught to us in school has to be corrected.
It is really painful listening this episode and knowing blunders of Mr. Nehru…. Pakistan and China must build Nehru statues for the help he had done to them
😂😂 and also Gandhi statues. Whithout them they would have been desecrated.
Dear Dalailama ji {Tibet} excuse India for not supporting you while you were being in attack by the rouge China.
China Russia and have become bane for the world.
@@shashwatparth3672 Who build iits, iims, isro, aims, bhava atomic research, green revolution instead of temples?
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@dibyakantidas9116 iits, iims mostly work for other nations interests. to some extents aims & isro works for this country sir...
wow such detailed information thank you very much for consolidating this information.
Wow ! holistic analysis of Mr. Nehru is like never before 👍 good going sir 😊
👿 i am experiencing rocket's engine thrust in my viens and flowing with hot boiled blood after listining to you sir .hatsoff to your work....Lets make india pride again😤💪🇮🇳
While I say Mr Gandhi and Nehru has destroyed India and it’s culture to a maximum extent, India thanks all all Hero’s and Heroines who have made India of the present day, including Gandhi and Nehru.
It seems that Mr Gandhi and Nehru were more cowards and ungrateful,cunning and anti Hindus and anti Bharat.
@RealPollitik is a bot, please do not waste your time by responding to it...
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
" Nehru was the worst disaster to ever hit India " ~ Outlook Magazine.
Sir, I just want to take a moment to say that I love the way your last few videos are produced, the increased quality is clearly visible. Keep up the good work sir, I appreciate every single video.
Down congress
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
The kind of research you have done and the compilation of facts presented in sequence is most precious work you have done. Hats off to you .
Wonderfully presented history.. my blood still boils… I am sharing this video.
Sir, this episode was by far the best one since long! Better than 1 hours.
What a precise and immaculate piece of information! Kudos 🙌🏻💙
Some people talk only about the ills of yesterday.
Why can't people talk of today's problems
By the way read the Discovery of India before making comments
@@Kbhaskaran15 sir Idk how u ended up on this video if you're not a dynamic fan of history. Khair, plz go thru some famous videos of Abhijit sir and u will get ur answer inform of correct information about the discovery of India, which is full of misinformation and diversions of Sanatan culture against what is the actual reality.
I will pray for you to get better guidance in this respect. Jai Hind 🙏🏻🇮🇳🕉❤
This is the most eye opening video of my life that I have ever watched
I will take responsibility to share it with at least 10 Congressis 🚩🙏😐
Thanks for making this video. This really is an eye-opener for everyone. What really saddens is that, even after all these blunders, Nehru (and Gandhi) is still praised as a great freedom fighter. Its high time, everyone is made aware of these things and celebs like you talking about it creates greater awareness. We stand with you.
It's a fabricated story! Nehru and Gandhi are heroes. N Modi, A Yogi and Amit Shah are criminals with blood on their hands. BjP is a fascist party.
Book recommendation for everyone: Nehru's 97 Major Blunders by Rajnikant Puranik.
👏🏼Thank You Abhijit Sir For Your Efforts Towards Spreading The Actual History Our Great Nation. Always a Pleasure Listening To You Sir🙌🏼🇮🇳✌🏼☮️
This is what happens when freedom is given rather than taken ..you are low on self esteem and still colonised
each word said by Abhijit sir is true & boils my blood to limits ....i had a image of Nehru as a man who took some wrong decisions but also took some right decisions regarding industrialisation , building iit's & pushing ISRO & atomic programme but Nations security is first ... land & people are most important & foremost thing.
His wrongs far outweigh whatever good he did
Atomic program initiates after defeated from China in 62 war । Other wise neharu believe india is peaceful country we don't need army we need only police ।
Excellent excellent powerpacked presentation ! An eye opener indeed... PLEASE SHARE THIS EXTENSIVELY...
ABHIJITJI, PLEASE CAN YOU ALSO DO THIS IN HINDI FOR WIDER AUDIENCE?
THANK YOU ❤
Thought provoking explanation. Well researched. Young generation should listen to this. Excellent narration
Thank you AC sir for this profound video. Really appreciate educating everyone on the actual facts and bringing ground reality in our lives.
It hurts to witness how chchaji treated his motherland like his property and dealt with enemies like junior grade kids
not chacha, British trojan horse.
Thanks!
Hello sir... Amazing explanation with facts and figures 🙌💯🤝
Ur new subscriber...i am class 12th humanities student and came after watching ur interview with Ranveer...✨
This fellow makes my blood boil !!!!! How the heck could he unleash such injustice on the entire nation and breach trust ?!!! 😡😡😡
Because Nehru was Muslim, He wanted the welfare of Islam.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
Mee toooo..
....🤬🤬🤬🤬
We will pay with a lot of blood, someday, just because of one man and his lineage and most of it will be shed between the fight of two factions of what was Akhand Bharat, in history...
Really admire the work you are putting into educating the young minds about the falsehoods taught to us by schools where we did no less than worship some of the worst men responsible for India's downfall. It's one thing to forgive them of their monstrous deeds and another to f**king worship them generations through( even in the new millennia).
Hats off to your constant effort in presenting the atrocities committed by these individuals factually.
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 Totally agree with your points. I have taken my time researching a bit on the topic after I showed this video to my friend who identified the video to be showing just one side of the coin. I have been following Mr. Chavda since a year perhaps and found his content to be factual and reliant. But lately there’s been a clear right orientation and aggressive nationalism in his recent videos.
Perhaps I should know better than to cloud my views based off of one video, which is kinda ironic in a sense that Mr. Chavda himself urges us to challenge textbooks and views presented by mainstream media.
@@Namokham can you explain the other side of the coin
always blown by the facts and arguments you put forward....please put on more of these videos
Thank you Chavda Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 .
Nehru being PM of India at the eve of Independence (that too unfairly elected as interim gov. results choosed Vallabhai Patel as PM) is not a good choice
His Blunders
1 Kashmir got half
2 Coco Island sell
3 Ignored veto in 1952 and 1955
4 Lose in War
5 Lose of Aksai Chin
6 Indus Rover Treaty
More than 100 blunders are there!
Tbh they were deliberate not blunders!
he even let china capture tibet in 1950 , add this
he rejected indian armed force because he loved peace not only that we could have probably become nuclear nation much earlier but nehru rejected it
nehru is the god of blunder and he left his grandchild rahul gandhi for us to suffer more
@@vedantvijay1 and at that time, provided rice from Asam for the invading red army 😅😂
Kindly produce such videos in state languages so that your important videos reach a wider audience who does not understand English. People of India must know these facts. Thank you very much.
This explains why the current generation thinks it is their birth right to be above the law😃 Thank you Mr. Abhijit Chavda for another amazing video
Goa is sadly famous for its Inquisition, which is contrary to humanity as much as to commerce. The Portuguese monks deluded us into believing that the Indian populace was worshipping the Devil, while it is they who served him.” - IS- Voltaire
The thought of Goa automatically elevates one’s mood. The idyllic setting of Goa is loved by foreign visitors as well as native Indians. All of these picturesque locales, happy people, and enthusiastic culture, however, have a tragic history. India gained its independence in 1947, but for Goa, it was December 19, 1961, after 451 years of Portuguese rule. Goa was one of three Portuguese colonies in India, the other two being Daman and Diu. The three territories were captured by India in 1961 and freed from the tyranny of the Portuguese.
Nehru’s political lethargy
Back in December 2021 PM Modi stated, “This year as we celebrate sixty years of Independent Goa, I want to say, had Sardar Patel been allowed to frame a policy for Goa like Hyderabad or Junagarh, Goa would not have to wait after fifteen years of the Indian independence to liberate itself.”
There’s no doubt that Nehru had nothing but despise and disregard for the satyagrahis who struggled hard for Goa’s liberation. Nehru always tried to carve a ‘holier than thou’ personality of his, by putting at stake the national interests. Nehru wanted an untarnished image and that’s why he didn’t use force to occupy Goa, which rightfully belonged to India. It was due to Nehru’s administrative inadequacy and incapability that freedom fighters of Goa, had to bear the brunt of Portugal rule for 15 more years.
Goan Inquisition
Inquisition was started by Pope Lucius III in 1184 CE, the Goanese Inquisition is a dark blot in Indian history. It is infamous as it was aimed at torturing, harassment and brutalizing and for persecuting ‘non-believers’. It was in 1545, the Jesuit ‘saint’ (Yes a saint!!) Francis Xavier wrote to his Roman masters requesting the Inquisition of Goa. The same Saint whose physical remains are kept in a famous church in Goa and thousands of ignorant Hindus pay respects to him. That’s sad and disturbing to know that how conveniently Hindus have been brainwashed. Sadly they have been made to forget the brutalities inflicted upon them and are encouraged to worship the one who instigated it. The Goanese inquisition was finally implemented by the Portuguese colonizers in 1560 and lasted until the year 1812. Innumerable people were burnt, tormented or murdered using various methods- most of them native Hindus. Discussion of this is now considered taboo due to the current political climate. A man who despised Hindus and invited colonizers to commit atrocities against them has been declared a ‘saint’.
It is unfortunate, that many Christians in Goa find their affinity with the Portuguese rather than with their motherland. They have forgotten the brutal history of persecution their ancestors underwent where they were forcibly converted.
Nehru’s political naivety and Goan territory acquisition
Nehru wanted to use diplomatic channels to further the cause in order to protect and advance his image as a peace-loving global leader. On December 11, 1961, after realizing that Nehru’s diplomatic maneuvering with his allies failed. His close aide VK Krishna Menon made the decision to send the army to Goa.
MENON MADE THE SUDDEN DECISION TO USE THE ARMY BECAUSE HE WAS RUNNING AGAINST JB KRIPLANI IN THE 1962 LOK SABHA ELECTIONS FROM NORTH BOMBAY. HIS PLAN TO CAPTURE GOA PAID OFF, AS HE WON THE ELECTIONS BY DEFEATING KRIPLANI. IT MUST BE UNDERSTOOD THAT IT WAS MENON, NOT NEHRU, WHO WORKED TO ASSIST GOA’S FREEDOM FIGHTERS.
It has to be understood that Nehru seeking constant validation from the western nations, did him especially India, no good. On February 27, 1950, the then-Nehru-led government requested that the Portuguese negotiate over the subjugated territories. However, because of white supremacy and dominancy, they asserted that its territory on the Indian subcontinent wasn’t a colony. They claimed that it was a part of metropolitan Portugal; hence its transfer was ‘non-negotiable.’ They went on to say that India had not been a republic since the time they had captured Goa.
The Portuguese capture of Goa dates back to Adil Shahis reign. Post India’s independence, Portuguese ruled the territories of Goa, South Konkan, and Daman and Diu for about 450 years. Rajmohan Gandhi, Gandhi’s grandson, described in his book a meeting between top leaders concerning Goa’s situation in 1950. “With tightly closed eyes, Patel was hearing all the points which were being made. He rose up to interject suddenly and said, “Want to enter Goa, it’s a matter of mere two hours”. However, Nehru was to decline this proposition and Patel did not interject thence.”
Nehru, being the best at what he did, did not allow the army to free Goa from foreign rule. He also openly opposed other Indian revolutionaries who wanted to join the Goa liberation. The following newspaper excerpt explains how the AICC actively prevented the Goan inquisition. It read, “Any entry into Goan soil by Indian Nationals will be inappropriate and even individual Satyagrahas should be avoided”. All this was done deliberately at a time, when the efforts of the freedom fighters were bearing fruits.
Conclusion
Although Nehru wanted to use diplomatic channels first, why did he pander to foreign forces so much? For a matter that concerns an Indian territory, why should an independent nation seek support from other western nations? Why did he muzzle the voices of Indian freedom fighters in Goa?
Indian Air Force bombed the Dabolim airport because of the bold initiative by former Defense Minister Menon. The Indian army entered Goa on the 18th and on the following day from the south. The Portuguese army surrendered as a result of the brave efforts of the Indian forces. However, even after so much diplomatic pandering, Nehru’s efforts didn’t pay off. Following the successful acquisition of Goa by the Indian army, many European nations, the USA, China, and the UK targeted India. As expected, these nations targeted India in the UN to stop the Indian army’s operations in Goa. Due to their innate hatred towards their former colony, the West did not spare any effort to damage India’s prospects. It was, therefore, pure political naiveté on Nehru’s part to expect help or support from the Western nations.
It’s not surprising that Nehru’s administration and governance failed India and Indians, on numerous occasions. We ceded our part of Indian Territory to China because of his ‘political expertise’ (pun intended!)- Aksai Chin. Our nations’ strategic interests have been compromised by Congress on more than one occasion: the 26/11 attacks, the Commonwealth scam, etc. Nehru clan has collectively failed Hindus on numerous fronts, and Hindus need to understand this. Every political party should understand that their own interests cannot trump the interests of citizens. Likewise, the people of the nation should realize what is good and in their own collective interests and not be gullible to the claims of others.
*I don't know how can a patriotic Indian watch this entire video without getting his/her blood boiling...*
🤧🤧
BlOo curdling situation
d
I am reading comments and i am so happy to see us Indians united ! Team India - lets learn from this original pappu and keep the jr. Pappu out on 2024. Time we grab what is ours. Hell, 1 in every 6 person is ours.. LET US TAKE OUR RIGHT BACK!
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma.
But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India.
Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC.
Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC.
Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took.
We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc.
What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier.
Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now.
@@harisbhai20 hey chacha ka chamcha .....stop spamming
when u understand knowledge (shiksha) than its become gyan (understanding) great work sir appreciate
"Na Laayak"
is the only word that comes to my mind.
Very well presented video. Keep making more videos of simillar format and presentation. Thank you so much for investing your time and sharing!!
When the video starts with throat singing, that's a great video.
edit: What an amazing video sir! Multiple questions answered in one video.
What I don't understand is that why are we not taught these things in school? Rather these politicians are rather glorified like anything! If we can study about the battles of Ashoka, what went wrong, what went right and the atrocities that were committed during it, why can't we study all of this?
Best video on tube today,massive eye opener!
Its surprising how optimistic USA was about India in those days. Nehru's holier than though & impractical decisions which was only good for boosting his own image and against national interest may have caused disenchantment or dissolution of any hope of India as a useful democratic centre in east.
Learnt a lot about indian history through this video! Thank you Abhijit Chavda!
A fabricated story. BjP is a fascist party.
Abhijit ji,Pls record this episode in Hindi, wanted to share with my relatives which are not well versed in English. I know it's lots of work to record every episode in 2 languages but this episode worth it.
This is just a brief explanation. There are lot of reasons why india was at its worst years from 1946 to 1962 and everything points towards mr.nehru's govt. Hope I see more video's on this particular topic in future @abhijitchavda sir.thank you
Nehru like b3trayers of India is a sham3 to our nation , loved mini videos like this about the topics which is to be told to every Indian. Nice sir 🙌🏻.
Hi beautiful
@@shuvadeepdey2574 Lol sudhar ja bhai ladki ki dp dikhi nai ki shuru ho gaya
@@shuvadeepdey2574 nhi degi😂
@RealPollitik is a bot, please do not waste your time by responding to it...
@@shuvadeepdey2574 Abe uncle, nhi degi vo.....😂🤣