It really depends on what the user finds valuable. I returned my 7800X3D combo to microcenter as it was not stable. It kept blue screening. The 14900K uses a lot more juice but it doesn't crash on me.
@@russomd i have a 7900X because i listened to an amd fanboy and was convinced to switch from intel, what a moronic move that was. amd sucks ass still and is absolute garbage with ddr5
no, they are going through their P4 era, buuuuut lets be honest here a well tuned intel even an 12gen i7 with fast ram will be up there with am5, even 7800x3d with 6000c30 sticks. But for those that dont wanna tune, amd 7800x3d is king.
If watts are the concern like me then get a minisforum bd790i. It has 16core ryzen 9 laptop cpu with max boost can only consume 85w(mb,ram,cpu,ssd) Without gpu, with any gpu increase the power draw from the mb to be 160w (75w solely for gpu from mb).
I got the 7800 X3D right when it was released because it looked like it'd stay near the top of the charts for a while without needing a dedicated nuclear power plant and that was spot on. It was even worth the stress with the early firmware issues that burned some sockets. Now it's like every new CPU review is basically an ad for the 7800 X3D.
@@poweruwa Well it kinda does if his old rig had like an i3 from well over a decade ago that was pegging 100% utilization when just loading the desktop. It's just a matter of perspective.
Not in 1% lows, but overall average yeah, and just a stonking great performer anyway. And that it pulls about the same power under all core load as the 14900KS pulls under single threaded is NUTS.
Intel copium: Ah, but if you look at the 1% low score, you'll see that the i9-14900KS beats the 7800X3D by 1 fps, and by a whole FOUR FPS with power limits disabled! Clearly the 14900KS is the superior gaming CPU.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall during the marketing meetings. "Ok, we're losing to AMD because our last launch of an expensive and impractically hot CPU nobody asked for isn't in line with consumer trends. How do we win them back?" "Oh I know, let's make another one of those, but make it hotter and more expensive!"
@@theyeetus1428 yep! But only if you're a big business, dedicated to ruin competition, and patent general ideas.. which the government or whichever organisation gives it out will help you acquire to monopolise entire business sectors and eliminate affordable shiiite for consumers. Otherwise, just start a business, you'll be crushed by competition!
Oh it's overrated, but for someone like myself who previously had an 11700KF, there wasn't a huge reason not to get one. The price difference between the K and KS was marginal. I think if someone already has a 13xxx then there's not much point in jumping to this chip, ESPECIALLY since it appears the 14xxx's are a bit dodgy. It made sense for me. I did have to adjust my BIOS to get it going smoothly though.
Doesn't matter, it is beating AMD 7950X and hits a nice 6.2ghz. Who cares about what technology is behind it. Making AMD even look bad as with better technology they can't even beat Intel on worse technology. Who is doing something really wrong then, AMD for sure.
@@Tunnelsnakes And my computer is in a small bedroom. Literally unusable for me. This room already gets 3-5 degrees warmer than the rest of the house while gaming. I can't use a cpu that is half of a space heater.
Yeesh, single threaded it's pulling more power than a 7800X3D at full draw? That's pretty bonkers. =/ I mean it's not a direct comparison, but just the fact that it's possible is astonishing to me.
It used to be that frying your CPU was a privilige for enthusiasts. But good guys at Intel thought it was not user friendly, so now they do it for you. It might be expesive, and require yet more expsensive harware to run alongside it, but you will get your system unstable and possibly fry your CPU without ever touching overclocking. What a time to be alive. Seriously thou, "Unlocked" is a centerpiece of this CPU marketing. Go higher, overclock, get that crazy boost frequency. And yet to avoid system instability, it needs to be locked to "baseline" profile. Wich was not a thing Intel cared about when they waved 6.2 gHz marketing flag, and it practicly makes it 750$ 13700k. Its not just shady, depending on where one lives, it might very well be qualified as false advertising.
@@solenoidnull9542 But extreme overclocking using liquid nitrogen it would still run at sub zero. Also that was not a monster water cooling rig it was just an AIO with a 360 radiator.
@@OneBiOzZ people who want to do "a hell of a lot more than just game on PCs" probably won't like the added costs of how power-hungry this card is for the boost in performance.
No one buying high end cars care about gas mileage. At least try to use common sense and realize there’s different mindsets to different classes of purchases.
@@JBrinx18 They do not lmfao Stop trying to argue things you don’t understand. No one spending 300 grand on a Lamborghini is worried about the gas mileage. A Bugatti owner doesn’t care. Modified 1,200hp track cars don’t care. This isn’t a Prius or Camry shopper.
@@TheBURBAN111 Shrug, even before that thing blew up online, I knew many people who were getting build and compile errors on their 13th and 14th gen CPUs when they hit high temps, on many different brands and classes of motherboards, and with more than decent cooling solutions. And they weren't always even the highest end SKUs doing that. Definitely felt like Intel was just flying slightly too close to the sun.
@@TheBURBAN111 Power limit? This is not a power limit issue (unless you mean "the CPU can so much power it kills itself"). X3D wasn't a power limit issue either. It was shorting between substrate layers.
@@jubuttib Other than a few early bios issues mines been fine even with an oc... and again its due to AUTO OC or MCE blasting an all core oc with insane voltages... and then the motherboard maxing out power limits and current/cache limit by default... ive noticed auto voltages of around 1.43v+ on 13th gen when mce or enhanced turbo is on... its not just a power limit issue... with enhanced turbo off and a manual all core OC auto vcore is a lot better but i still use a manual vcore with a different llc level than auto as i can get the voltage and temps as low as possible and keep full stability and better than stock performance if motherboards came with limits forced then a lot of this degradation and instability wouldn't be happening its basically a bad OC with insane vcore.
For my 13900k and 14900k I have done the following: MCE off, PL1 and PL2 limit to 225, limit P-core boost to 5.5 GHz and E-core boost to 4.3GHz, and use balanced power profile in Windows (although I do disable core parking to keep system highly responsive). Oh and just XMP on the RAM. I didn’t change LLC value. I have set voltage offset at a modest -0.010v. I have disabled the C6&C7 C states and EIST. Lastly I have locked AVX at 0 offset. I have tested on P95, CB R23 and CB R15. All great and in a mid 20 degree room, no workload exceeds 80c on package or cores. Very happy and benchmarks are very close to where they were before taming these beasts.
So this is the last Monolithic Intel form, the Final Form of the Monolithic die from Intel, The Idea seems to sell the Ultimate form of the Monolithic CPU ever when everything maxed out Press F to respect, we shall never see something like this again, ever, the Monolithic Era is over
While I like the idea of the efficiency cores that intel is putting into CPUs. It's really sad none of their chips are actually that efficient. Even in laptops you're usually getting better battery life and more power with AMD. Hopefully Intel can actually innovate again and make some more worthwhile chips.
Should've mentioned the massive recalls/refunds that this line of CPU's has been having lately. I'm having my 14900K swapped (returned and given a new one) in a couple weeks, and the Internet is filled with other such cases where people had to swap 3-4x until they got "a good one" that wouldn't deteriorate over time. This was very briefly talked over on TechLinked somewhat recently.
nice 1 bro hope everybody understand that wave of RMA will coming Intel still blaming mobo, and mobo still blaming intel lol maybe most of this channel viewer not up to date with intel recent instability issue
The best high end cpu for Gmaing+Productivity is 7950x3d It provides a huge performance while being very easy to cool (it does not consume a lot of power)
8:36 I remembered the FX9590 too! People thought it was insane having a CPU with a 220W TDP that came with a **gasp** 120mm AIO!! Ok, it was hot garbage, but still, funny how perception changed. Back then a 200W+ CPU was just as insane as, say, a $1000+ GPU. "Who would ever buy that?" We thought.
@@theunknown7683 not only can you air cool it, you can put a 30$ cooler on it and it will stay inaudible. The one I installed consumed 40-50W in gaming and 80W max...
I bought one since I was on an 11700KF. The official spec I can find says ICCMax is 307A and PL1/PL2 is 253 Watts. I can't find any Intel specific source on the extreme power profile of 400A and 320 Watts, but I've played with my powers a bit. In practice, 307A 253 Watts is just fine and under normal circumstances. Benchmarks are where things diverge quite a bit. If you can run this thing stable, it will eat 300, 400, 500 watts... it's kind of bananas. But so far I can't see a big advantage to pushing it that far in daily use. I'm keeping mine at 307A 253 watts for now just to keep it running a little cooler, and unfortunately my setup's DDR5 XMP isn't very stable with higher powers to the CPU. So to put it another way, if I let this thing run unleashed my build can do a Passmark CPU score of around 67,000, if I reign it in, it is around 61,000. It's definitely an Intel flex to overclockers and bragging rights and not much else. To people who want to USE it, it's still just a K.
@@StormKhan-p4b I'm not the best to ask but I'm not seeing many choices. There's apparently one by Lian Li and one from Enermax that can handle 300+ watts. Pushing a 14900KS is probably best done with a 420mm or custom loop. I'm not seeing much that can touch the kind of heat these things are capable of generating.
Let me sum up modern LTT for you: It would be cool to do these things to this chip. We could Delid it, We could use an all copper contact plate. But we aren't going to because that would be expensive. So disappointing, just do it! It would make this video Way better
You should make a video focusing on performance compared to wattage used. For the whole pc. I like my next gaming pc to draw as little power as possible and be good at gaming at the same time.
The fact I got a K series intel chip just so that I could undervolt it and then put a 125W power cap would probably make many in the LTT audience cry.. But hey, I get 2.3 times more performance in Cinebench R23 with only 1.5 times the power draw compared to the old 12400f, which was already quite efficient.. 209pts per Watt 👍 This 14900ks is 111.4pts/W stock, down to 97.3pts/W overclocked.. absolute madness
If you want to have a chance of keeping the temps under control, you should delid it and go for direct die cooling, EKWB even supports it by default now.
EK is having financial problems and having issue not paying employees. So i wouldn't trust them with warranty on their products. I have an Ek AIO and not impressed with what is happening at Ek at the moment and how things are being ran by management.
I really don't understand the issue. There has always been an overpriced, very top end Intel CPU every generation for years now. This isn't out of the ordinary, and 'power costs' have never been a concern. I don't care how good gas mileage a car gets if the top speed is only 30 miles an hour. If I want power, I will acquire all of the power.
The I9, whatever something something k is the Jeremy Clarkson of processors. It's all about speed and power at the cost of any and all practicality, including heat, price, and actual use. AMD all the way
I'd say it's more like the Orange County Chopper of CPUs. It's kind of impressive, but ridiculously more expensive than reasonable, not fuel efficient, and you never really enjoy using it.
Thank you for this video, i was going to build a new pc with a 6000$ budget and had 14900KS in my list. But this energy consume for nothing is ridicoulus. I will go with Amd for the first time in my life since 90s
Huh, they still have the core i naming schemes in this processor... Is intel's new naming scheme just not apply for all of their current processors or what?
The new naming only started with the release of Meteor lake laptop chips. It hasn't come on desktop it. It will most probably come to desktops with Arrow Lake.
@@TuxikCE ah i see, i understand now Yeah i knew the laptops already had the naming scheme but was confused about the PC part not getting it yet. Thanks for the explanation!
The reason I prefer (and bought) the 7950x3d, is because of its power usage. The 14900ks consumes way too much power with not enough performance gain compared to the 7950x3d.
The "I'll give you 200Mhz more just before thermal throttling due to the 50% power consumtion increment needed to reach that whooping speed increase" way of living.
i live in an apartment where power is a flat rate included into the rent price (and no matter how much of it i use - i pay the same amount of money) and i still wouldn't get 14900K or 14900KS for either my professional (think: a lot of large project compilation and programming work) or gaming workloads. 7950X does the same thing but at lower power and easier to cool, and 7800X3D would be better for the games I play. Not to mention that AM5 platform will see 1-2 more generations of CPUs, while Intel's 14 gen is the last one of the current socket.
I'd love to see the 14900KS capped. You were talking how at this point 200mhz is basically nothing, but I remember when going from 2.1 to 2.4 it was like... Life changing. Cap this thing at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6ghz and let's see the actual performance gains. Where on this does it get the biggest perf jump? Maybe add 1.5, 2.5, etc. see how much it actually changes.
The screwdriver ad at 2:50 is edited in such a witty way that I can't be mad about it.. Nice job editors!!
yeah genius
I agree
was thinking the same
You know that that is editor initiative and people say 'Yeah, that's cool, brah. Leave it in!'
At this point, I think Intel just wants to make heaters. Not CPUs, GPUs, just house heaters.
Laptops and Laptop CPUs existed for decades dude, you are a bit late
You think Dyna Glo needs to worry?
You can buy heaters that mine Crypto.
Laptops were the weaker version of their heaters, now they'll perfect it into a box that isn't too big, but still warms up the whole house. 🤣
Lol something being “heater” is slang for awesome, and I agree.
3x the power consumption for -2% the gaming performance of a 7800X3D. What a steal!
DAYUMN😆
It really depends on what the user finds valuable. I returned my 7800X3D combo to microcenter as it was not stable. It kept blue screening. The 14900K uses a lot more juice but it doesn't crash on me.
@@russomd i have a 7900X because i listened to an amd fanboy and was convinced to switch from intel, what a moronic move that was. amd sucks ass still and is absolute garbage with ddr5
@@ralph1660 FAFO
@ralph1660 gets a terrible cpu, blames entire amd for it, their gpus suck but their cpus beat intel in gaming
Intel is going through their AMD FX phase. I hope they get into a new Ryzen phase soon
And I hope that AMD’s follow to Ryzen is a whole new architecture that beats the crap of the Ryzen phase. Edit: and then Intel does the same.
HAhahAHa.... Which century will that happen?
So glad people are finally pushing for competition rather than being fan boys..
nah FX was way worse. this is more than decadence rust rather than f*king up badly
no, they are going through their P4 era, buuuuut lets be honest here a well tuned intel even an 12gen i7 with fast ram will be up there with am5, even 7800x3d with 6000c30 sticks. But for those that dont wanna tune, amd 7800x3d is king.
I don't care about FPS nor GHz.
I'm just here for the Watts.
Texas Instruments TI-83 Plus might serve you well.
I’m here for the 1 kilowatt.
If watts are the concern like me then get a minisforum bd790i. It has 16core ryzen 9 laptop cpu with max boost can only consume 85w(mb,ram,cpu,ssd)
Without gpu, with any gpu increase the power draw from the mb to be 160w (75w solely for gpu from mb).
Oooh 69
@@evilsam4 no one will like now
I got the 7800 X3D right when it was released because it looked like it'd stay near the top of the charts for a while without needing a dedicated nuclear power plant and that was spot on. It was even worth the stress with the early firmware issues that burned some sockets. Now it's like every new CPU review is basically an ad for the 7800 X3D.
It's hilarious that all the 7800x3d needs for cooling is a damn AMD stock cooler and it won't throttle, not even in cinebench.
@@sergioav7278 But then it is way slower than a 14900K(S). So yeah buying slow things need not much investment.
Can confirm. My rig has a 7800x3d and that thing is crazy fast. Games load like instantly.
@@idkwhattohaveasausername5828your CPU doesn't really have any relevancy to how fast your games load lol
@@poweruwa Well it kinda does if his old rig had like an i3 from well over a decade ago that was pegging 100% utilization when just loading the desktop.
It's just a matter of perspective.
6:08 - You brush past that graph mighty fast but the 7800X3D was the fastest here in-case anyone blinked
Not in 1% lows, but overall average yeah, and just a stonking great performer anyway. And that it pulls about the same power under all core load as the 14900KS pulls under single threaded is NUTS.
Intel copium: Ah, but if you look at the 1% low score, you'll see that the i9-14900KS beats the 7800X3D by 1 fps, and by a whole FOUR FPS with power limits disabled! Clearly the 14900KS is the superior gaming CPU.
@@jubuttibthat's with slow ram for an intel CPU as well so that ain't too bad xd
@@nathangamble125and then crashes just three months later for that 4 FPS 🤣
120W vs 400W
Can't wait for intel i9 169000ks that you will overclock it to 6.9 ghz that will be nice video
That's going to be a core ultra 9 390KS I think 🤔 probably. Who knows what the naming scheme of Intel will turn into.
At 800W for 10 seconds.
*nice*
@@JorgenKremer Core Ultra 9 16900KS
I'd love to be a fly on the wall during the marketing meetings. "Ok, we're losing to AMD because our last launch of an expensive and impractically hot CPU nobody asked for isn't in line with consumer trends. How do we win them back?" "Oh I know, let's make another one of those, but make it hotter and more expensive!"
Ladder upselling is a cheap and effective way to get extra profits. Consumer FOMO is a real thing.
Intel has 80% CPU marketshare lmao only AMD internet fanboys think AMD is winning in anything
Lol, 320w is absolutely insane for a desktop cpu
400W, the 14900KS consumes 400W. The one that consumes 320+W is the 14900K
agree yeah
14900KS: _Intel regretting not investing in UV lithography_
Yea, but what is the loss of a few billions.
They them are intel 💅
@@yasirrakhurrafat1142 Yeah, who needs to be careful with money when an entire government will just sponsor every stupid financial decision?
@@theyeetus1428 yep!
But only if you're a big business, dedicated to ruin competition, and patent general ideas.. which the government or whichever organisation gives it out will help you acquire to monopolise entire business sectors and eliminate affordable shiiite for consumers.
Otherwise, just start a business, you'll be crushed by competition!
What do you mean ?, they already use DUV
EUV... UV was used for ages
As we know that a watt is a unit of power. Intel just makes more powerful cpus year after year.
another refresh of a refresh of a refresh of a refresh
Oh it's overrated, but for someone like myself who previously had an 11700KF, there wasn't a huge reason not to get one. The price difference between the K and KS was marginal. I think if someone already has a 13xxx then there's not much point in jumping to this chip, ESPECIALLY since it appears the 14xxx's are a bit dodgy. It made sense for me. I did have to adjust my BIOS to get it going smoothly though.
Doesn't matter, it is beating AMD 7950X and hits a nice 6.2ghz. Who cares about what technology is behind it. Making AMD even look bad as with better technology they can't even beat Intel on worse technology. Who is doing something really wrong then, AMD for sure.
I lost count of haswell +'s.
@@jankees4037You sound mad
@@jankees4037 i really cant tell if youre serious tho i really hope youre not
My cpu, it's gonna be a nice warm winter
Summer is coming soon >:D
@@Tunnelsnakes And my computer is in a small bedroom. Literally unusable for me. This room already gets 3-5 degrees warmer than the rest of the house while gaming. I can't use a cpu that is half of a space heater.
@@sphygobuy a thunderbolt dock and move it to another room
@@sphygo well i have a haf 700 evo with 16 fans and a 420 aio, heat isn't really a problem, i run my 14900ks with a -0.15v undervolt
@@fabianmennel4478 thats not how that works ...
When CPU wasting more watts than there are mms in aio radiator, you know there is something wrong.
Yeesh, single threaded it's pulling more power than a 7800X3D at full draw? That's pretty bonkers. =/
I mean it's not a direct comparison, but just the fact that it's possible is astonishing to me.
intel supporting the electric utility suppliers since 1968 🤣
A perfect ad for a 7800X3D.
AMD: Thread Ripper!
Intel: Uh, that's a sewing machine feature, right?
Like Tesla, we vacuum the house with that brand.
My phone is weirdly warm while watching this video. That's just how hot this CPU runs I guess 🤣
nah I’m faster
That's what she said 😏🤣
@@dftfiredamn I came to say exactly this 👆
hell yeah
I'm so sorry. Have you tried tablets?
Nah I’d win
4:35 87w single-core power draw. Which was the full multicore TDP of the entire CPU in my previous PC (4790k).
It used to be that frying your CPU was a privilige for enthusiasts. But good guys at Intel thought it was not user friendly, so now they do it for you.
It might be expesive, and require yet more expsensive harware to run alongside it, but you will get your system unstable and possibly fry your CPU without ever touching overclocking. What a time to be alive.
Seriously thou, "Unlocked" is a centerpiece of this CPU marketing. Go higher, overclock, get that crazy boost frequency. And yet to avoid system instability, it needs to be locked to "baseline" profile. Wich was not a thing Intel cared about when they waved 6.2 gHz marketing flag, and it practicly makes it 750$ 13700k. Its not just shady, depending on where one lives, it might very well be qualified as false advertising.
80w singelcore is crazy tho. my 7800x3d pulls 87 with all cores at 100%. thats ALL CORES vs A SINGLE CORE
Funny how a CPU half the price from AMD beat it by a few fps consistently (in games)
It’s almost as if different products have different use cases.
Simple minded nonsense.
its a CPU for extreme overclocking, people do a hell of a lot more than just game on PCs.
@@OneBiOzZ Extreme overclocking? Its sitting at 100 celcius idle with a monster water cooling rig...
@@solenoidnull9542 But extreme overclocking using liquid nitrogen it would still run at sub zero. Also that was not a monster water cooling rig it was just an AIO with a 360 radiator.
@@OneBiOzZ people who want to do "a hell of a lot more than just game on PCs" probably won't like the added costs of how power-hungry this card is for the boost in performance.
nah we need 480mm coolers now 360mm ain't cutting it
The idea is that the CPU is shitty hot.
Future intel CPu's will be going down on the the frequiency and using less wattage, so no, you won't need one
FYI, the T(Junction) of this CPU is 100°C
It actually goes over that in this video, so it is 100% thermal throttling here
of course it would. unless you can get some subambient cooling on top of it, or direct die cool it, that IHS is just choking the chip.
This is like advertising a car that does 0-100mph in 2 seconds and a max speed of 300 mph, and not mentioning it gets 0.1 miles to the gallon.
They literally mention it multiple times, and even Intel mention how much power it draws..
Your listening comprehension seems to be lacking
No one buying high end cars care about gas mileage.
At least try to use common sense and realize there’s different mindsets to different classes of purchases.
@@brandonhoover2120they care at a certain point. If they have to refill every time they get down the road, they would care
@@JBrinx18 They do not lmfao
Stop trying to argue things you don’t understand.
No one spending 300 grand on a Lamborghini is worried about the gas mileage.
A Bugatti owner doesn’t care.
Modified 1,200hp track cars don’t care.
This isn’t a Prius or Camry shopper.
It's missing the "*" stating that gets returned for failure in mere gaming loads.
imagine using a motherboard power limit/voltage issue to make intel look bad. ppl did the same shit when x3d was exploding.
@@TheBURBAN111 Shrug, even before that thing blew up online, I knew many people who were getting build and compile errors on their 13th and 14th gen CPUs when they hit high temps, on many different brands and classes of motherboards, and with more than decent cooling solutions. And they weren't always even the highest end SKUs doing that. Definitely felt like Intel was just flying slightly too close to the sun.
@@TheBURBAN111 Power limit? This is not a power limit issue (unless you mean "the CPU can so much power it kills itself"). X3D wasn't a power limit issue either. It was shorting between substrate layers.
@@jubuttib Other than a few early bios issues mines been fine even with an oc... and again its due to AUTO OC or MCE blasting an all core oc with insane voltages... and then the motherboard maxing out power limits and current/cache limit by default... ive noticed auto voltages of around 1.43v+ on 13th gen when mce or enhanced turbo is on... its not just a power limit issue... with enhanced turbo off and a manual all core OC auto vcore is a lot better but i still use a manual vcore with a different llc level than auto as i can get the voltage and temps as low as possible and keep full stability and better than stock performance if motherboards came with limits forced then a lot of this degradation and instability wouldn't be happening its basically a bad OC with insane vcore.
@@samiraperi467 basically boards running the 14900ks at 1.5v on stock.
For my 13900k and 14900k I have done the following: MCE off, PL1 and PL2 limit to 225, limit P-core boost to 5.5 GHz and E-core boost to 4.3GHz, and use balanced power profile in Windows (although I do disable core parking to keep system highly responsive). Oh and just XMP on the RAM. I didn’t change LLC value. I have set voltage offset at a modest -0.010v. I have disabled the C6&C7 C states and EIST. Lastly I have locked AVX at 0 offset. I have tested on P95, CB R23 and CB R15. All great and in a mid 20 degree room, no workload exceeds 80c on package or cores. Very happy and benchmarks are very close to where they were before taming these beasts.
Update: I have now undervolted to -0.015v and set the Core limit to 300 Amps.
At this point just buy a R7 x3d bro
@@-Ninnux- in the end I just set PL1 and PL2 to 253w and power limit to 320A.
@@-Ninnux-Nah the dude gonna make his own x3d
So glad i just stayed on AM4 and upgraded to a 5800X3D
The 5800X3D is likely to be useful for at least the next 5 years, possibly 10. It's like how Skylakes are still okay-ish now.
Ok buddy good for you. This is an enthusiast chip.
you don't need to only fry on it you can now boil water on it
A true engineering marvel, that it can pull so much more power for little performance increase.
"Weren't we supposed to be saving the planet or something?" hahahahaha gold
When intel was caught themselves using a makeshift chiller, we all knew where we heading. Hope the future isn't just throw more power at it
3:23 With Intel CPU you'll always be within the heat of the game.
So this is the last Monolithic Intel form, the Final Form of the Monolithic die from Intel, The Idea seems to sell the Ultimate form of the Monolithic CPU ever when everything maxed out
Press F to respect, we shall never see something like this again, ever, the Monolithic Era is over
i call this bulls*it, its not fastest, but highest clocking one "stock/oem" that can be bought
were you even listening? thats exactly what they said
While I like the idea of the efficiency cores that intel is putting into CPUs. It's really sad none of their chips are actually that efficient. Even in laptops you're usually getting better battery life and more power with AMD. Hopefully Intel can actually innovate again and make some more worthwhile chips.
My guy just gave idea to Alex
I bet we'll see this CPU next time when he's de-liding it
Should've mentioned the massive recalls/refunds that this line of CPU's has been having lately.
I'm having my 14900K swapped (returned and given a new one) in a couple weeks, and the Internet is filled with other such cases where people had to swap 3-4x until they got "a good one" that wouldn't deteriorate over time.
This was very briefly talked over on TechLinked somewhat recently.
nice 1 bro hope everybody understand that wave of RMA will coming
Intel still blaming mobo, and mobo still blaming intel lol
maybe most of this channel viewer not up to date with intel recent instability issue
skill issue
CPUs normally still work years and years after they are obsolete. I doubt even the good ones will last much longer than the warranty.
7950x3d is still absolutely nuts for anything I throw at it. Without using all my electricity
The best high end cpu for Gmaing+Productivity is 7950x3d
It provides a huge performance while being very easy to cool (it does not consume a lot of power)
Tell me you don't actually own a 7950x3d without saying it, lol.
at that range, users who can afford it doesn't even care about the price, they just got to have it.
Nah
~25% start having stability issues after a few months.
I think it's even more than 25%
8:36
I remembered the FX9590 too! People thought it was insane having a CPU with a 220W TDP that came with a **gasp** 120mm AIO!!
Ok, it was hot garbage, but still, funny how perception changed. Back then a 200W+ CPU was just as insane as, say, a $1000+ GPU. "Who would ever buy that?" We thought.
Have my 7800x3d tuned for efficiency with pbo2. Only pulling 45-55w under gaming loads and about 75w on all core
The only reason I watched fully is to see if Jake can make nothing interesting and he so did! Love you man, keep up the good work!
6.2GHZ HIGHEST FREQUENCY EVER!*
*Single core, for 14 seconds. Results my vary.
tbh id rather just get a 6.0 all core haha which is only doable with a custom loop and delidding usually.
@@TheBURBAN111 not usually, that is the only way to get 6 GHz all core.
Pat: Make it faster!
Engineer: But sir, it's gonna draw over 300 Watts!
Pat: FASTERR!!!
i wouldnt even recommend if not just gaming. 7800x3d you dont need a 360 aio, intel is crazy
Hell you can air cool a 7800x3d. Air cooling a 14900ks is just asking for thermal throttling.
@@theunknown7683 not only can you air cool it, you can put a 30$ cooler on it and it will stay inaudible. The one I installed consumed 40-50W in gaming and 80W max...
@@StormKhan-p4b no its not I have a 5800X3d and use fan cooling lol stay away from Garbage intel products
In my opinion, among all the LTT members, Jake is the best one who could truly replace Linus
it's crazy to think about that this thing eats more power than my CPU and GPU combined 😅
I bought one since I was on an 11700KF. The official spec I can find says ICCMax is 307A and PL1/PL2 is 253 Watts. I can't find any Intel specific source on the extreme power profile of 400A and 320 Watts, but I've played with my powers a bit. In practice, 307A 253 Watts is just fine and under normal circumstances. Benchmarks are where things diverge quite a bit. If you can run this thing stable, it will eat 300, 400, 500 watts... it's kind of bananas. But so far I can't see a big advantage to pushing it that far in daily use. I'm keeping mine at 307A 253 watts for now just to keep it running a little cooler, and unfortunately my setup's DDR5 XMP isn't very stable with higher powers to the CPU. So to put it another way, if I let this thing run unleashed my build can do a Passmark CPU score of around 67,000, if I reign it in, it is around 61,000. It's definitely an Intel flex to overclockers and bragging rights and not much else. To people who want to USE it, it's still just a K.
@@StormKhan-p4b I'm not the best to ask but I'm not seeing many choices. There's apparently one by Lian Li and one from Enermax that can handle 300+ watts. Pushing a 14900KS is probably best done with a 420mm or custom loop. I'm not seeing much that can touch the kind of heat these things are capable of generating.
Getting 5 of these and making the world's fastest goon cave>>>> 💯💯
Yeah, there should be an efficiency rating (like with the bulbs) on the CPUs as well.
Intel: We have the biggest balls
AMD: yeah, but no sperms!
some would argue that is an advantage :D
@@marsovac Hmm, being super macho and depopulating the earth?🤔🤨
@@marsovac Just like it can be used a s a space heater.
Let me sum up modern LTT for you:
It would be cool to do these things to this chip. We could Delid it, We could use an all copper contact plate. But we aren't going to because that would be expensive.
So disappointing, just do it! It would make this video Way better
320Watt? That’s a no bueno from me
That CPU is just throttling the whole time... amazing IQ on these testers... What the fuck linus.
13th and 14th are crashing 100% , dont buy them , total waste of money , even ifff you are harddcore intel fanboy ,
if you could buy them for cheap through the fear mongering, you're still getting a great deal, just underclock it.
@@winmen5279 KS for underclock lol
@@winmen5279 I ignore it since I'm having no issues at all
I did buy a 14900k as a workstation, tried a 7950 but it wasn’t as good rendering
@@Soussa-h4e how good are the features on amd motherboards?
Can’t wait for Linus to slap a copper ihs on it and make it faster
Wrong..... The fastes AND hottest cpu
It's a high bin for tweakers. Running it out the box for no reason this is not for you.
these things crash hard, often and fast. Most expensive worst chip ever.
You should make a video focusing on performance compared to wattage used. For the whole pc.
I like my next gaming pc to draw as little power as possible and be good at gaming at the same time.
easy choose AMD in this case 7800x3d or 5800x3d.
The fact I got a K series intel chip just so that I could undervolt it and then put a 125W power cap would probably make many in the LTT audience cry..
But hey, I get 2.3 times more performance in Cinebench R23 with only 1.5 times the power draw compared to the old 12400f, which was already quite efficient..
209pts per Watt 👍
This 14900ks is 111.4pts/W stock, down to 97.3pts/W overclocked.. absolute madness
Finally someone in this thread who knows what they are doing.
200$ for 2% more performance, 20 degrees more temp and 200W more power draw
If you want to have a chance of keeping the temps under control, you should delid it and go for direct die cooling, EKWB even supports it by default now.
EK is having financial problems and having issue not paying employees. So i wouldn't trust them with warranty on their products. I have an Ek AIO and not impressed with what is happening at Ek at the moment and how things are being ran by management.
How the tables have tabled
How the turns tabled
how the turns have turned
Intel FX-9590😂
LTT: Wow 6.2Ghz!!
Me: Not amused. I'm old enough to remember when Intel promised 10GHz by 2005... at less than 1V...
I wonder if when Jake shaves will Linus's beard reappear
I really don't understand the issue. There has always been an overpriced, very top end Intel CPU every generation for years now. This isn't out of the ordinary, and 'power costs' have never been a concern. I don't care how good gas mileage a car gets if the top speed is only 30 miles an hour. If I want power, I will acquire all of the power.
The I9, whatever something something k is the Jeremy Clarkson of processors. It's all about speed and power at the cost of any and all practicality, including heat, price, and actual use. AMD all the way
I'd say it's more like the Orange County Chopper of CPUs. It's kind of impressive, but ridiculously more expensive than reasonable, not fuel efficient, and you never really enjoy using it.
Those watts and heat are insane for what is literally no performance gain
For that much extra money they could have at least added a copper IHS or something like that...
The IHS already is out of copper.
What do you think the IHS is made of? Hint: Nickelplated copper.
Remember to not let it go 100% limitless, it might get unstable at high load.
Still running a 2600k here lol
Cudos to Jake for just being down to Earth honest! 👏👍
AMD: "Oh no, not again. Guys, let's Ryzen to the occasion
Would be nice if they started working on lowering wattage use instead of adding on an extra few 100mhz speed increases.
€1/5h gaming.
Thank you for this video, i was going to build a new pc with a 6000$ budget and had 14900KS in my list. But this energy consume for nothing is ridicoulus. I will go with Amd for the first time in my life since 90s
Intel be like nah i'd win and consumes enough power and blows up sockets
I love the end-gag at 1:00. Hilarious.
Huh, they still have the core i naming schemes in this processor...
Is intel's new naming scheme just not apply for all of their current processors or what?
This is still the 14th gen. The new branding will only apply to future generations.
The new naming only started with the release of Meteor lake laptop chips. It hasn't come on desktop it. It will most probably come to desktops with Arrow Lake.
@@TuxikCE ah i see, i understand now
Yeah i knew the laptops already had the naming scheme but was confused about the PC part not getting it yet.
Thanks for the explanation!
7800X3D…. 65w, and walks out of the room.
So, it's basically 700$ garbage
Yup if you want intel get 13700k
And you probably shouldn’t get intel.
call me delusional but I like the 7800x3d more 😌
Edit:oh wow didn't expect them to mention the 7800x3d good job me I deserve a medal 😂
Still rocking a 3600 and I'm happy with it.
This is in the same power consumption class as threadripper
10nm+++++++++(
14900KS: comes out
7950X: _Perhaps we treated you too harshly._
The reason I prefer (and bought) the 7950x3d, is because of its power usage. The 14900ks consumes way too much power with not enough performance gain compared to the 7950x3d.
The "I'll give you 200Mhz more just before thermal throttling due to the 50% power consumtion increment needed to reach that whooping speed increase" way of living.
i live in an apartment where power is a flat rate included into the rent price (and no matter how much of it i use - i pay the same amount of money) and i still wouldn't get 14900K or 14900KS for either my professional (think: a lot of large project compilation and programming work) or gaming workloads. 7950X does the same thing but at lower power and easier to cool, and 7800X3D would be better for the games I play. Not to mention that AM5 platform will see 1-2 more generations of CPUs, while Intel's 14 gen is the last one of the current socket.
This CPU needs a chiller.... and thats a good video to do ;)
On the topic of packaging, 9900K had the best packaging.
I'd love to see the 14900KS capped.
You were talking how at this point 200mhz is basically nothing, but I remember when going from 2.1 to 2.4 it was like... Life changing.
Cap this thing at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6ghz and let's see the actual performance gains. Where on this does it get the biggest perf jump? Maybe add 1.5, 2.5, etc. see how much it actually changes.
Live in Poland, electricity costs a lot and it's about to get 40% higher, my 7950x3d was a smart choice
10:00 even it is used to evaporate water easily😂😂..Water Colling gone nuts😂
1 million of these would be enough power to time travel.