Short correction for recursive trigger ..not good to use static boolean variable to check for recursive as it will work for first 200 records but not after that ....its better to use set to store operation type and list of records process
Thank you for pointing that out! You’re absolutely right-using a static boolean variable to prevent recursive triggers works only within the scope of a single transaction (up to the first 200 records in a batch). For larger datasets or when multiple transactions are involved, using a Set to track processed records is indeed a more robust and scalable approach. We’ll make a note of this best practice for future content updates. Thanks again for sharing your insights and helping improve the discussion!
Short correction for recursive trigger ..not good to use static boolean variable to check for recursive as it will work for first 200 records but not after that ....its better to use set to store operation type and list of records process
Thank you for pointing that out! You’re absolutely right-using a static boolean variable to prevent recursive triggers works only within the scope of a single transaction (up to the first 200 records in a batch). For larger datasets or when multiple transactions are involved, using a Set to track processed records is indeed a more robust and scalable approach. We’ll make a note of this best practice for future content updates. Thanks again for sharing your insights and helping improve the discussion!