as a plumber, i had to replace the sewer from the house to the lateral of the city sewer. it also was shared with the next door. they refused to help pay for their share of the replacement so, i was told not to reconnect their home. as a result, the owner who refused to pay had their home condemned. (no sanitary sewer) oh well. they had no lateral to connect to. they would need to connect directly to the main. what would have cost them around $1000 probably cost them $12,000. cheap skates learn the hard way.
When was that subdivision built? Who approved it, along with river disposal? @ 65, this makes no sense to me! How long ago has dumping waste been illegal!
@@chiefsnarlsnortz1610 inside city limits. unknow when homes were built but it was and still is common in that city. i expect they were done just after ww2 with the rush of/demand of homes. dumping waste has been illegal (SEWAGE) for many years.
Surprisingly the city didn't penalize your customer. Happy ending. I just paid 12k for 80 feet of sewer but that included 10x20 driveway paving above it.
@dlight9849 I worked for a water & sewer municipality for 40 years and these shared "Y" connections are quite common, probably the reason that the other Homeowner does not have to pay or be involved is that this woman's problem is on her own private separate branch of that "Y" junction and her neighbor's portion is fine, the municipality is normally responsible from the "Y" fitting and on the single pipe portion. If the shoe was on the other foot would she be willing to pay the costs to repair her neighbor's connection if there were no issues on her portion? 🤔
It's because they are not selling their house, which means it isn't mandatory to make the repairs. She didn't have to either, but she's the one selling her house and that is why it's being done in the first place, so that is why the neighbor bears no responsibility for it. He's not selling his home, she is. Thus, the repair needing to be done in the first place is solely due to action being taken by her, not both of them. Whether the neighbor wants to contribute or not is obviously completely up to them, and to be honest, if I was them and if I was looking into selling in the future, I'd split the cost with her. However, if I wasn't planning on selling, I'd have to really think about it. It's tricky for sure.
@@dyates6380 Nothing tricky about it. What if there were three houses on the lateral? Four? Heck what if everyone on that side of the street was on that same lateral that EVENTUALLY hit the city main. Would she still be responsible the entire distance? As soon as it went from "hers" to "common" it should be on the sewer district to maintain.
She probably doesn't. I am pretty sure combined lines are no longer authorized anywhere. I know my house in texas was still using an old combined line that ran through my neighbors yard, but that neighbor had a new line that was separate.
I rented a backhoe, bought the pipeline and did this myself. 1500 dollars. A plumber wanted over 10000. Now im out of the city. Well and septic. I do everything. Electrical, plumbing. Whatever, i do not pay anyone for anything.
They did that where I live years back when they replaced all public water lines under the street. The people who could not pay had bonds against their land and the land was taken by city later.
We have a little bicycle shop in a small town. This summer the city decided to replace the pipes, sidewalks, street lights and roads. The tiny, ornamental park across the street was neglected so, with our own meager funds, we planted some perennials. It was torn away also. The shaking of the machines to our building knocked down plaster and broke dishes. The noise and mud scared customers away and we (as well as the other shops I'm sure) lost at least a third of our seasonal income. On top of all this we now owe the city almost $20,000'for the pleasure.
Every house I owned the sewer and water line connections from the house to the street were my responsibility. The new thing is every one is selling water line insurance and sewer line insurance, I get offers from the power and gas company every billing cycle. So yes, from the house to the street comes out of the homeowners pocket,..
If the city put in those lines, that is part of their infrastructure of city services, if the homeowner pays a monthly fee or a yearly fee, as in the case of my city, which just doubled, by the way, then the homeowner is not responsible to repair or replace the cities infrastructure. I don’t care how many laws they pass. This person had kept with a septic tank. This wouldn’t be an issue, but the cities infrastructure sounds old since it’s clay and needs to be replaced so they decided to let the homeowners pay the price. Bad form.
This is not part of the city sewer. It is the service line into the home, which is always the homeowners responsibility and installed by the homebuilder. Unfortunately, these are very old clay tiles, which allows tree roots to enter and haven't been used for decades. Newer homes have plastic piping that is impervious to roots, so this law really only effects older homeowners.
What is everyone say that I pay a dollar a month? I should get it everything now for free because I’m paying something. Yes, the city could’ve repaired all of these and raised everybody’s taxes, but people would’ve complained about that too
There's no such thing as a property tax. The correct term is housing tax. But the regime doesn't want you realizing that housing should not be taxed. You have the right to anyone without the regime encroaching through punitive taxation.
@@PilotVBall Yes, reality doesn’t matter. Only your conspiracy theory does. And your job at the bureau of naming things all allows you to tell everyone what things are really called.
@@PilotVBallthey tax you on the value of the land as well as the house and any other improvements such as a swimming pool, so that's why it's property tax.
@@PilotVBall Housing Tax, Property Tax? No, it's government rent. We The People are not allowed to own property but rather we rent it from the government. If you don't think so then don't pay your rent and you'll get evicted. You also need to get the owners permission and pay them a fee if you want to modify their property.
This is good thing. I bought my house and unaware sewage line was damaged and backing up and i now am stuck with repairs. Homeowner should had it fixed prior to selling.
Epoxy pipe relining, also known as trenchless pipe lining, is a minimally invasive method for repairing drain, waste, and vent lines using epoxy resin to create a new pipe within an existing damaged one:
@@beckymash12 It depends on how bad it is. If it’s collapsed, no. If there’s just some broken pieces inside, yes. I watched a video on how they do it years ago. They have a pusher on a long spool that removes the broken bits and then they evert a new pipe dripping with resin into the old pipe.
Why not have the city offer low cost loans for sewer installation and upgrades that are tied to the property and can be transferred to new owners? Several municipalities offer this program
It's not you, it's the reporting!! It sounds like there are two issues with her sewer lines: 1) Her clay tile (common in older homes) sanitary sewer line likely has a low spot or is damaged. The contractor runs a camera down the line, records it, and it gets sent to the city inspector for review before house can be sold. The inspector ordered repairs be done to that line. 2) Her gutters, foundation drain tile, and or sump pump is discharging into the sanitary sewer line instead of the storm sewer (clean water) line. This leads to massive inflows to wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) during rain events. The WWTP cannot possibly handle all of this, so the sewage/rainwater mix overflows into the river, lake or ocean the plant discharges into. This is why E. coli warnings at beaches after storms are common. This is called infiltration & inflow (I & I). Most cities do not have their own WWTP and get billed by gallons of sewage sent to the plant. Thus, it is very expensive to have clean water treated unnecessarily. Also, the EPA has started getting tougher on raw sewage discharges and fines the WWTP operator for spillages. My hometown dealt with this issue about 20 years ago. They hired a contractor to do all homes in town (to get a good price), and the city then paid 50% of the bill. The balance was placed on property taxes if one could not afford it.
@@danlowe8684 Many cities in the Midwest (including Maumee) have a combined sanitary/storm system. There is no separate storm system. That's the problem.
The problem with, "Market Rate" pricing is that it's based on an even market. When you pass a city ordinance and mandate a time line, you drastically change the parameters of that even market. Short time lines and a flood of clients because of the new ordinance makes a flood of clients. Rates now go up. Does the city works department not understand this?
Who doesn't carry sewer and water line coverage on their insurance? If the city says lines need replacement let the ins company work it out Mine is.coverage up to 20k for line replacement.
Our gov. leaders at all levels seem to think because they have a large pile of our tax $$$ dollars to play with when they want to that homeowners should have no problem in coming up with $12,000.00 or in case of some people living 70 miles down out cost that need to come up with $100,000.00 extra by Dec. 2024. If they don't come up with the $100K they may lose their homes. I hope things work out for Ms. Grzecki. Shalom
Is the neighbor actually affected by the problem? If not, then why should they split the bill? If the answer is "not yet" then they'll be paying eventually.
My house has a clay sewer lateral. I pay an added cost (around 60 dollars.) to my property tax every year which is "insurance" incase my line needs replacing. If it does need replacing the city will replace at no extra charge to me. The old line is still good, chugging along since 1955, but I know it could go at anytime.
How can that sewer not be be up to code it's been working ever since they connected their they just want to make her move it so they can bounce her out
Exactly. A contractor field day, then the city has the balls to whine about, "Market Rates". Standard Market Rates are only applicable when it's an even and stable market. Throw in a new mandated by-law with a short time line and you have an artificial field day. Prices go up.
Our City has not only Sewer and Water line help for repairs but they also have spent months and years replacing old sewer lines in every subdivison as needed! WTH is going on in that City?...crazy.
Fees (a tax), local taxes, city taxes, state taxes, federal taxes... Does anyone else see a pattern? The system gets rich under the guise of the "community wins" as the potholes get bigger... Communism is in the taxation...
Not really, the pipes to the city sewer runs through her property thus makes it her responsibility. The neighbor would be responsible for the piping that is on their property. The builder saved costs by connecting the neighbors line into the other persons line thus pocketing the saving from having to run two separate lines.
Our line ran across the adjoining neighbours property ( house built in 1921) Our neighbours " piggy backed" on our efforts, got to have their line done for a fraction of a full job, because the trench was dug when we did ours. They didn't lift a finger, or bother with a permit. Increased the value of their property by over $20,000.
Prior to listing your home you should have had the sewer line inspected. Then you proceed with getting your quotes and or getting the necessary repairs completed.
Well it should be home owners responsibility to fix to city sewer hookup but not a the neighbors sewer line tell plumber don't connect the neighbors line to your new sewer line not your responsibility !! Stand your ground but I would ask neighbors first if they will share the cost & if not well you know what to tell your plumber !!!
We dont own our tree lawns or sidewalks in ohio. I dont understand why the city expects the homeowner to pay for a pipe they own. They charge us a monthly fee for the pipe. They should maintain their pipe, in my opinion.
NOT LIKELY. THEY COVER WHAT IS INSIDE THE HOUSE AS FAR AS SEWER LINES. I JUST WENT THRU THIS DUE TO MY TAP BEING OFF THE MAIN AND IT COST ME 12K TO FIX OR THE CITY WOULD HAVE CONDEMNED MY HOUSE. THERE ARE COMPANIES OUT THERE THAT OFFER SEWER LINE COVERAGE FROM THE OUTSIDE OF UR HOME TO THE TAP. I HAD THIS ...LONG STORY SHT AFTER GETTING THE CITY INVOLVED THIS INS REIMBURSED ME 2/3RDS THE COST AFTER INITIALLY DENYING THE CLAIM.
Who originally planted sewer lines to A River! & When? How long has that subdivision been there? How many houses.or businesses are discharging in the river? Is this a national issue in this day an age? That’s been outlawed for how many decades? Should’ve been fixed ages ago! 😢 Wake Up America 🇺🇸
The Government is not your friend, no matter how many of your friends work there. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. 1 Timothy 6:10 That City council needs some sweet Jesus upside their heads.
So is the fire department. Libraries, too. Public education and community healthcare… Veterans Admin. So many things that help other’s are not acceptable to MAGA.
This is the LATERAL sewer line running from the house to the public sewer main. Clearly the responsibility of each homeowner. Anyone, who is not an idiot, can purchase an insurance policy to cover these repair costs foe less than 50 bucks a year......you just can't fix stupid
So, she wants to sell a house with outdated clay sewer lines? Seems unfair to stick the buyer or city with that bill. She sure doesn't seem to be hurting for cash looking at the decor and fixtures in that house.
as a plumber, i had to replace the sewer from the house to the lateral of the city sewer. it also was shared with the next door. they refused to help pay for their share of the replacement so, i was told not to reconnect their home. as a result, the owner who refused to pay had their home condemned. (no sanitary sewer) oh well. they had no lateral to connect to. they would need to connect directly to the main. what would have cost them around $1000 probably cost them $12,000. cheap skates learn the hard way.
Luv that! Hope she does the same, if needed?!
When was that subdivision built? Who approved it, along with river disposal? @ 65, this makes no sense to me! How long ago has dumping waste been illegal!
@@chiefsnarlsnortz1610 inside city limits. unknow when homes were built but it was and still is common in that city. i expect they were done just after ww2 with the rush of/demand of homes. dumping waste has been illegal (SEWAGE) for many years.
Nobody wants to pay and make everything someone else's problem.
Surprisingly the city didn't penalize your customer. Happy ending. I just paid 12k for 80 feet of sewer but that included 10x20 driveway paving above it.
Two neighbors share the sewer but only one is being forced to pay for the repairs -- why no explanation on this? MIMS
@dlight9849 I worked for a water & sewer municipality for 40 years and these shared "Y" connections are quite common, probably the reason that the other Homeowner does not have to pay or be involved is that this woman's problem is on her own private separate branch of that "Y" junction and her neighbor's portion is fine, the municipality is normally responsible from the "Y" fitting and on the single pipe portion. If the shoe was on the other foot would she be willing to pay the costs to repair her neighbor's connection if there were no issues on her portion? 🤔
@@Serpico1152 But they said she has to replace the line to the STREET, not just to the "Y". Looks like 1/3 or more of the run is after the "Y".
It's because they are not selling their house, which means it isn't mandatory to make the repairs. She didn't have to either, but she's the one selling her house and that is why it's being done in the first place, so that is why the neighbor bears no responsibility for it. He's not selling his home, she is. Thus, the repair needing to be done in the first place is solely due to action being taken by her, not both of them. Whether the neighbor wants to contribute or not is obviously completely up to them, and to be honest, if I was them and if I was looking into selling in the future, I'd split the cost with her. However, if I wasn't planning on selling, I'd have to really think about it. It's tricky for sure.
@@dyates6380 Nothing tricky about it. What if there were three houses on the lateral? Four? Heck what if everyone on that side of the street was on that same lateral that EVENTUALLY hit the city main. Would she still be responsible the entire distance? As soon as it went from "hers" to "common" it should be on the sewer district to maintain.
No way I would leave neighbor connected!
If she alone pay, she shouldn't have to pay for a duo line, no link to the neighbor.
She probably doesn't. I am pretty sure combined lines are no longer authorized anywhere. I know my house in texas was still using an old combined line that ran through my neighbors yard, but that neighbor had a new line that was separate.
I rented a backhoe, bought the pipeline and did this myself. 1500 dollars. A plumber wanted over 10000. Now im out of the city. Well and septic. I do everything. Electrical, plumbing. Whatever, i do not pay anyone for anything.
Not many people have those skills and would just mess things up worse. Also could be a problem for an average person getting a permit to do this
This is the way - aka freedom.
Some cities require a licensed contractor. Insured and Bonded.
Good way to save some $$. But you ever encounter an issue. Unlikely that your home owners insurance will cover.
I kinda want to see your electrical. Half what I see diy, scares me. Currently helping one rebuild, after diy burned their house down.
They did that where I live years back when they replaced all public water lines under the street. The people who could not pay had bonds against their land and the land was taken by city later.
We have a little bicycle shop in a small town. This summer the city decided to replace the pipes, sidewalks, street lights and roads. The tiny, ornamental park across the street was neglected so, with our own meager funds, we planted some perennials. It was torn away also. The shaking of the machines to our building knocked down plaster and broke dishes. The noise and mud scared customers away and we (as well as the other shops I'm sure) lost at least a third of our seasonal income. On top of all this we now owe the city almost $20,000'for the pleasure.
Every house I owned the sewer and water line connections from the house to the street were my responsibility. The new thing is every one is selling water line insurance and sewer line insurance, I get offers from the power and gas company every billing cycle. So yes, from the house to the street comes out of the homeowners pocket,..
If the city put in those lines, that is part of their infrastructure of city services, if the homeowner pays a monthly fee or a yearly fee, as in the case of my city, which just doubled, by the way, then the homeowner is not responsible to repair or replace the cities infrastructure. I don’t care how many laws they pass. This person had kept with a septic tank. This wouldn’t be an issue, but the cities infrastructure sounds old since it’s clay and needs to be replaced so they decided to let the homeowners pay the price. Bad form.
This is not part of the city sewer. It is the service line into the home, which is always the homeowners responsibility and installed by the homebuilder. Unfortunately, these are very old clay tiles, which allows tree roots to enter and haven't been used for decades. Newer homes have plastic piping that is impervious to roots, so this law really only effects older homeowners.
Wonder if a relative of the of the city is a line repairman.
All this done with the best of intentions, what could possibly go wrong?
They already pay property tax and the city should pay for it since they want it done !
What is everyone say that I pay a dollar a month? I should get it everything now for free because I’m paying something.
Yes, the city could’ve repaired all of these and raised everybody’s taxes, but people would’ve complained about that too
There's no such thing as a property tax. The correct term is housing tax. But the regime doesn't want you realizing that housing should not be taxed. You have the right to anyone without the regime encroaching through punitive taxation.
@@PilotVBall
Yes, reality doesn’t matter. Only your conspiracy theory does. And your job at the bureau of naming things all allows you to tell everyone what things are really called.
@@PilotVBallthey tax you on the value of the land as well as the house and any other improvements such as a swimming pool, so that's why it's property tax.
@@PilotVBall Housing Tax, Property Tax? No, it's government rent. We The People are not allowed to own property but rather we rent it from the government. If you don't think so then don't pay your rent and you'll get evicted. You also need to get the owners permission and pay them a fee if you want to modify their property.
This is good thing. I bought my house and unaware sewage line was damaged and backing up and i now am stuck with repairs. Homeowner should had it fixed prior to selling.
Hire an inspector (that sends a camera down the drain/sewer lines) b4 you purchase
@@onenikkionealways. We own and have our sewer line inspected every two years after some neighbors had horrible damage to theirs from a tree
Epoxy pipe relining, also known as trenchless pipe lining, is a minimally invasive method for repairing drain, waste, and vent lines using epoxy resin to create a new pipe within an existing damaged one:
It’s not available everywhere, though.
@@evilsharkey8954 a real plumber can get anything anywhere!!!
@@beckymash12 It depends on how bad it is. If it’s collapsed, no. If there’s just some broken pieces inside, yes. I watched a video on how they do it years ago. They have a pusher on a long spool that removes the broken bits and then they evert a new pipe dripping with resin into the old pipe.
might cast just as much. only difference is no digging up the yard
This is why I don't live in the city limits, Country Baby!
Why not have the city offer low cost loans for sewer installation and upgrades that are tied to the property and can be transferred to new owners? Several municipalities offer this program
I watched the video and it kept going back and forth between sewers and storm drains so are they the same?
It's not you, it's the reporting!! It sounds like there are two issues with her sewer lines: 1) Her clay tile (common in older homes) sanitary sewer line likely has a low spot or is damaged. The contractor runs a camera down the line, records it, and it gets sent to the city inspector for review before house can be sold. The inspector ordered repairs be done to that line. 2) Her gutters, foundation drain tile, and or sump pump is discharging into the sanitary sewer line instead of the storm sewer (clean water) line. This leads to massive inflows to wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) during rain events. The WWTP cannot possibly handle all of this, so the sewage/rainwater mix overflows into the river, lake or ocean the plant discharges into. This is why E. coli warnings at beaches after storms are common.
This is called infiltration & inflow (I & I). Most cities do not have their own WWTP and get billed by gallons of sewage sent to the plant. Thus, it is very expensive to have clean water treated unnecessarily. Also, the EPA has started getting tougher on raw sewage discharges and fines the WWTP operator for spillages. My hometown dealt with this issue about 20 years ago. They hired a contractor to do all homes in town (to get a good price), and the city then paid 50% of the bill. The balance was placed on property taxes if one could not afford it.
@@danlowe8684 Many cities in the Midwest (including Maumee) have a combined sanitary/storm system. There is no separate storm system. That's the problem.
We have a similar ordinance in Sidney OH.
The leaking sewage must be cleaned up.
Who should pay?
Well, whose poo is it?
If you make a law that requires repairs are to be made, repair prices are going to go up.
The problem with, "Market Rate" pricing is that it's based on an even market. When you pass a city ordinance and mandate a time line, you drastically change the parameters of that even market. Short time lines and a flood of clients because of the new ordinance makes a flood of clients. Rates now go up. Does the city works department not understand this?
Who doesn't carry sewer and water line coverage on their insurance? If the city says lines need replacement let the ins company work it out
Mine is.coverage up to 20k for line replacement.
It seems quite expensive I’ve replaced my sewer line from the inside to the city and it only cost $6000
Our gov. leaders at all levels seem to think because they have a large pile of our tax $$$ dollars to play with when they want to that homeowners should have no problem in coming up with $12,000.00 or in case of some people living 70 miles down out cost that need to come up with $100,000.00 extra by Dec. 2024. If they don't come up with the $100K they may lose their homes. I hope things work out for Ms. Grzecki. Shalom
In most communities house to main connection is the homeowner's responsibility.
Is the neighbor actually affected by the problem? If not, then why should they split the bill? If the answer is "not yet" then they'll be paying eventually.
My house has a clay sewer lateral. I pay an added cost (around 60 dollars.) to my property tax every year which is "insurance" incase my line needs replacing. If it does need replacing the city will replace at no extra charge to me. The old line is still good, chugging along since 1955, but I know it could go at anytime.
Do hoa cover this?
Government ruins everything it touches.
It is HER line . . . until there is more than one person on it. Then it is the CITY'S line!
@@Look_What_You_Did Because otherwise she could CUT the line and leave the neighbor without sewer? So "fak off".
How can that sewer not be be up to code it's been working ever since they connected their they just want to make her move it so they can bounce her out
Looks like the city legislated a contractor field day.
Exactly. A contractor field day, then the city has the balls to whine about, "Market Rates". Standard Market Rates are only applicable when it's an even and stable market. Throw in a new mandated by-law with a short time line and you have an artificial field day. Prices go up.
Our City has not only Sewer and Water line help for repairs but they also have spent months and years replacing old sewer lines in every subdivison as needed! WTH is going on in that City?...crazy.
Fees (a tax), local taxes, city taxes, state taxes, federal taxes... Does anyone else see a pattern? The system gets rich under the guise of the "community wins" as the potholes get bigger... Communism is in the taxation...
It seems to me that the owner's problem stops at their property line. It seems like BS that the owner is stuck paying for both.
Basically just make a single line from her house, let the neighbor pay when they have their house done, easy peasy😅
City has passed an illegal ordinance, shared sewer = shared cost.
Not really, the pipes to the city sewer runs through her property thus makes it her responsibility. The neighbor would be responsible for the piping that is on their property.
The builder saved costs by connecting the neighbors line into the other persons line thus pocketing the saving from having to run two separate lines.
What are taxes for??
Paying city workers and government pensions
Never allow city sewer to be connected to your home. We're never moved to an area that has pre-existing City sewer.
Maumee is a terrible place to live. Downtown is absolutely awful.
Our line ran across the adjoining neighbours property ( house built in 1921) Our neighbours " piggy backed" on our efforts, got to have their line done for a fraction of a full job, because the trench was dug when we did ours. They didn't lift a finger, or bother with a permit. Increased the value of their property by over $20,000.
They should have disconnected your sewer line as it was on their property
Prior to listing your home you should have had the sewer line inspected. Then you proceed with getting your quotes and or getting the necessary repairs completed.
Well it should be home owners responsibility to fix to city sewer hookup but not a the neighbors sewer line tell plumber don't connect the neighbors line to your new sewer line not your responsibility !! Stand your ground but I would ask neighbors first if they will share the cost & if not well you know what to tell your plumber !!!
Not an issue if her neighbor had agreed to pay for their share of the shared sewer.
The ordinance is illegal and the city needs to be sued.
We dont own our tree lawns or sidewalks in ohio. I dont understand why the city expects the homeowner to pay for a pipe they own. They charge us a monthly fee for the pipe. They should maintain their pipe, in my opinion.
Seems like something taxes should cover.
Don't hook neighbor back up
I wonder if her insurance would cover any of it.
NOT LIKELY. THEY COVER WHAT IS INSIDE THE HOUSE AS FAR AS SEWER LINES. I JUST WENT THRU THIS DUE TO MY TAP BEING OFF THE MAIN AND IT COST ME 12K TO FIX OR THE CITY WOULD HAVE CONDEMNED MY HOUSE. THERE ARE COMPANIES OUT THERE THAT OFFER SEWER LINE COVERAGE FROM THE OUTSIDE OF UR HOME TO THE TAP. I HAD THIS ...LONG STORY SHT AFTER GETTING THE CITY INVOLVED THIS INS REIMBURSED ME 2/3RDS THE COST AFTER INITIALLY DENYING THE CLAIM.
@@relevant.c5411 I'm glad you got at least partial coverage. Still expensive for you. Insurance companies can be awful. Glad you persisted.
Except this is Ohio😮
Sure sounds like a scam
She did this without understanding of how long it takes to process the inspection - takes 60 days
Who originally planted sewer lines to A River! & When? How long has that subdivision been there? How many houses.or businesses are discharging in the river? Is this a national issue in this day an age? That’s been outlawed for how many decades? Should’ve been fixed ages ago! 😢 Wake Up America 🇺🇸
This law is in place to protect the environment. I support it 100%.
The Government is not your friend, no matter how many of your friends work there.
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. 1 Timothy 6:10
That City council needs some sweet Jesus upside their heads.
So much garbage and so many hidden costs on your home this is why like I like renting... too much to deal with expensive when you getting up in age
Garbage government rides again.
well as for the neighbor, hes not wanting to sell and dont new sewer lines updated, all you honey
Colonialism 2.0
'... everyone pays a tax or a fee because all would benefit from it ...' That's SOCIALISM lady and something Americans don't want. 😂
So is the fire department. Libraries, too. Public education and community healthcare… Veterans Admin. So many things that help other’s are not acceptable to MAGA.
I thought we were done with defund the police nuts?
@@maryswanson9982: 🎯I don't get why people don't understand that America already has elements of socialism.
This is the LATERAL sewer line running from the house to the public sewer main. Clearly the responsibility of each homeowner. Anyone, who is not an idiot, can purchase an insurance policy to cover these repair costs foe less than 50 bucks a year......you just can't fix stupid
Its called life ....lady
So, she wants to sell a house with outdated clay sewer lines? Seems unfair to stick the buyer or city with that bill. She sure doesn't seem to be hurting for cash looking at the decor and fixtures in that house.
😉 Exactly. Outdated and failing
She specifically said she did not want to pass on the problem, not even as escrow.
Who gives up to f*** about that River
Could only happen in Florida.
Ohio is NOT in Florida. Try to keep up.