Well, to be honest, both the Byzantines and Sassanids (ESPECIALLY the Sassanids) were pretty much worn out from the decades of war between each other. In Persia especially, where the elites were fighting among themselves. It was a major advantage for the Arabs.
@@lekevire How could you live in a desert with a small armies and have an advantage ?? just look at the wars statics how big the disadvantage they have!
@@marcotagliavini9128 Sassanid and Byzantines got united in order to defeat Rashidun Caliphate but lost 😁 read about battle of Firaz where these two superpowers ganged up on Rashidun.
that expansion rate is just unreal....God willed it is the only explanation...especially when you take into consideration that 2 greatest powers on earth were surrounding the caliphate
This is what happens when you follow allah's orders and his prophet and this is what would happen if we were to do the same, unfortunately we are far behind doing this right now
@asahi toki well that is due to geographical reasons. It isn't the same in the rest of the Islamic world and who told you they were alone. When defeating Soviets , Usa supported them. During the American Invasion of Afghanistan the Afghans lost 90% of their country. It was just that the Americans couldn't get the Taliban out from the deep tribal structures of Afghan society. The Americans won the battles but the Afghans won the war.
@@Ismail-hx4qj I disagree. I think this is the propaganda excuse America uses to save its fragile ego. At the end of the day the Americans surrendered and retreated. They’re supposedly the worlds strongest military power. It shouldn’t matter if they have “caves to hide in”.
@@fakesrtengaming4917 yeah they fled because of their infighting between them and unluckily at same time Christian kingdoms started to unite and launched a holy war at that point there was no such eman and love for the life after they were only taking pride in the things related to this world . At that era which lam talking about no one ever could beat muslims in any battlefield because that was eman and love for Allah
@@fakesrtengaming4917 muslims were such a small force they don't only had christians as their enemies the sassinads of Persia, native non Muslim Arabs and the Jews but still as I said it's not easy and untill now in history a small force having so much kinds of enemies but still they reached all over crossing levant,whole of north Africa and reaching and capturing Spain in just 150 yrs man think of it it's not easy in fact it's impossible for a normal person without the help of the Almighty Allah
If you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
@@3d8dmusic85 Arab Muslims first attacked Sassanid territory in 633, when Khalid ibn al-Walid invade masopotimia which was the political and economic centre of the Sassanid state. Following the transfer of Khalid to the Byzantine front in the Levant, the Muslims eventually lost their holdings to Sassanid counterattacks. The second Muslim invasion began in 636, under Saad ibn Abi Waqqas, when a key victory at the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah led to the permanent end of Sassanid control west of modern-day Iran. For the next six years, the Zagros Mountains, a natural barrier, marked the border between the Rashidun Caliphate and the Sassanid Empire. In 642, Umar ibn al-Khattab, then-Caliph of the Muslims, ordered a full-scale invasion of Persia by the Rashidun army, which led to the complete conquest of the Sassanid Empire by 651. At this period Perisan have King yazdigar 3, his commanding officer was Rustom, Hormozd.
"God's message to the Mankind:" *O mankind, remember the favor of Allah upon you. Is there any creator other than Allah who provides for you from the heaven and earth?* *There is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him(Allah). How can you then be deluded ˹from the truth˺?* Qur'an (35:3) Allah almighty says, *Those who disbelieve(in Allah) will have a severe punishment. But those who believe and do good will have forgiveness and a great reward.* Qur'an (35:7) Allah almighty says, *O mankind, indeed the promise of Allah is truth, so let not the worldly life delude you and be not deceived about Allah by the Deceiver [i.e., Satan].* *Surely Satan(Devil) is an enemy to you, so take him as an enemy. He only invites his followers to become inmates of the Blaze(very large burning fire).* Qur'an 35(5:6)
@@bytelaw1711 "WHO IS ALLAH AND POWER OF ALLAH:" He is Allah, the One and Only. Allah is Independent of all and all are dependent on Him. Neither has He an offspring nor is He the offspring of anyone. And none is equal with Him in rank. Quran Chep 112 There is no moving creature on the earth whose sustenance does not depend on Allah: He knows its dwelling place and its repository. Everything has been recorded in an open register Quran (11: 6) And Allah has brought you out from the wombs of your mothers while you know nothing. And He gave you hearing, sight, and hearts that you might give thanks (to Allah)." Quran (16:78) It is Allah(SWT), Who has bestowed His blessings upon you when you were in your mother's womb enveloped in darkness by three veils with no one having access to you to provide food and constituent factors of growth and upcoming existence. He has rendered your mother's bosoms flow abundantly and has shown you the two highways of virtue and vice. He has devoted your parents to care about, and supply you with all means of survival. Should He withhold His Mercy for just a blink of an eye, you would not survive. Consider the food, which you eat at every meal and think from where it came? The vegetables, grain, fruit, meat, fish, poultry, milk eggs or dairy products and so on. Who brought forth the crops which farmers grow to be processed into delicious food? Who created animals whose flesh may be cooked to give us sustenance, or from which milk is obtained? Only our Creator is the Maker of provisions for us on this earth. And surely, to gain these we need to work. Indeed prophets themselves have striven for the sake of obtaining sustenance.
So just mind that Hazar Turks stopped the expansion of Islam into the wider European region in the Caucasus. If Islamic armies were victorious over the Turkic tribes, nothing would stop their passage into the vast, unprotected Eurasian plain. Armies of the Caliphate would appear right at the doorstep of Slavic and Baltic tribes. This is kinda unknown, but a very important event that has come to steer the course of modern history.
They stopped because of the mountains in the area. Additionally, Caliph Omar did not want to expand more because he wanted to maintain his new conquered lands and to not over extend his supply lines. Even in Egypt he was hesitant to invade it and he sent a message to Amer the general of the muslim army that was going to take Egypt to stand down but Amer did not open the message until he reached Egypt and started his conquest.
Does the Turkish government teach about how bad the Muslims treated the turks in the pagan period with wars and enslavement or do they just brush it off
@@yagizkart1 Wrong, the Turks were defeated and the Khagan was captured by himself and converted to Islam and the Khazar state became affiliated with the Caliphate since the year 737. I advise you to read the campaigns of Muslimah bin Abdul Malik and Marwan bin Muhammad against the Khazars, who stopped the caliphate, which is the devastating civil wars and the rebellions of the leaders. Take, for example, the war between the Yemeni armies and the Qaysiyah In Spain and France, he caused more losses than the Franks and the Goths
@@yagizkart1 The only era in which there were no problems was the era of Al-Walid bin Abdul-Malik (705-715). During his reign, the whole of Central Asia was conquered by Qutayba bin Muslim, the invasion of Anatolia by Maslama bin Abdul-Malik, the invasion of North Africa by Musa bin Nusayr and then headed To invade and conquer Iberia in just 4 years also attake suoth france, the commander Ibn al-Qasim also conquered Sindh and parts of northern India
I don't think Bahrain was under the rule of the Persian at the time because from what I remember in school the teachers told me that Prophet Muhammad also sent a letter to the ruler of Bahrain who also ruled Yemen if I am not wrong his name was mundan Bin Sawan
@@GreatTurkicKhagnate Not true. But if you ask me I would prefer if we had more turkic people that slavic. But thracians are majority theb are slavs and then turkics which are very low btw
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow Kutayba bin Muslims and the Umayyads did nothing but attack the Turkics. By the way, I love being Turkish more than anything else. HOW HAPPY IS THE ONE WHO SAYS I AM A TURK.
@@cihanturan7398 if you turks had not accepted islam, you would remain in those desert plains of central asia. Your ancestors would feel ashame of you watching you taking pride in your race and not you religion first
Umm yes they did They Conquered almost all areas of Sassanids in battles of Al Qadissiya battle of Jahavan etc. Up until the Sassanids were officially finished.
f you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
@@3d8dmusic85 Who studies late Sassanid history of a bunch of Weakling Fodders? Sassanid was a Vast empire State Stretching from Iran to Afghanistan. By War Standards Sassanids Had much better equipment and veteran soldiers Veteran Generals Imperial monarchy Their Country underwent a so called Civil Disruption which wasn't even that much of a big deal that Sassanids couldn't even fight and just rolled over to the Arabs. And a Kid took over the responsibility as a king is a blame which should be placed upon the Sassanids not the Arabs. The Arabs Gave the Sassanids Two ultimatum Either pay Jizya Or be Muslim or get your military in gear up and running and for battle. Battle of Dhi Qar when the Sassanids invaded Arabia Got Destroyed by The Pagan Arabs(Pre islamic Arabia). And during the muslim Expansion The Sassanids in every major Battles Placed Massive number of Soldiers Than the Muslims And still lost. And Don't play The Oh If We weren't at war we would have Crushed the muslims accept your Defeat like real men don't cry like a 12 yr old. The Sassanids Had the Romans backing them up With a coalition and still lost. And this is just blatant Stupidity. A desert dwelling People With no empire ,No economy, Tribal differences Civil war And power struggle People Who had No Large war experience came and Crushed two of the biggest Empires In the World Who Fought Countless And had Large economy Trade Infrastructure veteran Military Generals Seasoned Tactician. And still ended up losing to the muslims Cry a river Over it. Even if they were at their peak They will still be nothing in front of Rashidun Remember that. Also The Arabs themselves had Civil wars fitna wars And fought Tyranny amongst themselves And Still were man Enough to Solo Both super powers at the same time. Also your greatest generals and commanders died? What a bunch of BS. The very difference is The Arabs are true believers and ready to lay their life for God While Enemies fear their lives.
Can ali hear you in his grave? No ali ( may Allah be pleased with him ) is dead unable to hear or talk to you but Allah is the one who never dies so ask him instead
Rashidun reached till Ankara city and reached deep into Anatolia. All of west Anatolia & also parts of east Anatolia was conquered by Rashidun. They reached till wall of Constantinople. Just search on *Battle* *of* *Mast* *(654)* *Siege* *of* *Constantinople* *(654)* You will know
@@shakeelofficial6418 that was the ummsyad caliphate in the 1st arab seige of Constantinople. The occupation you've described was also extremely temporary, with contantine IV defeating many in the battles using fireships.
I'd actually like to correct my self here, as it was the Rashidun who made inroads into Anatolia and besieged Constantinople at that time, but they weren't in a position to gain much. the campaign was mainly by sea, and not by actual land. I am unfamiliar with any Muslim acquisition of Ancyra, but all of Anatolia was firmly in byzantine hands after the second Arab siege of Constantinople, showing little to no consequence if it was at all captured
@@eneytkachenko3854 Rashidun caliphate defeated roman/bzyantine army in western Anatolia in *Siege* *of* *Germanicia* *(638)* In 654, Rashidun governor Moavia successfully captured Ankara city.
all first 3 caliphs RA did great job in conquest but Hazrat AS did not conquered land in his caliphate bcz of civil war and turmoil started by khuwarijoon in last muwaya snatched his legal caliphate illegally and caliphate of Imam Hussian AS Note : I'm suni but i follow hadith One of identification of hypocrites is that they hate Ali AS How Powerful and enthusiastic names are of Rashidun RA💞
@Araf Tamim Astaghfarullah inshaAllah u willbe with yazid LA at the day of judgement they illegally took power by fighting with hazrat Ali AS hypocrite wahabi keep loving yazid LA who wanted to change islam by his own will let us love Hussian AS who gave everything in path of Allah to save islam
Muawiyah RA was praised by the prophet Muhammad ﷺ and is part of a saved group because he led the first naval expedition and there's a hadith where the prophet Muhammad ﷺ said that the first Muslims to take part in a naval expedition and the first Muslims to attempt to take Constantinople will enter into Jannah. The reason why Muawiyah RA fought Ali RA was because he wanted justice for Uthman RA. Both of them were in the wrong for fighting each other but Ali RA was closer to the truth. We love both of them and pray that Allah forgives any mistakes they may have made and enters them into Jannah.
@@thecoolestfaisal Ali AS can never be wrong only these statements willbe from mouth of hypocrites Muwaya RA was wrong indeed don't compare Shan e Ali AS with muwaya RA or any other sahabi he was greatest of all of sahabis his wife is khaton e janat his sons are Prince of heavens his blood is holy blood of prophet saww indeed ❤💞
@@thecoolestfaisal brother i don't know why sunis try to balance Maqam of Ali AS with other sahabis knowing that he was most praised by prophet saww and Holy sahabis like Abu bakar RA,OmarRaa ,Usman RA and many more he is one who did most serives of Rashduen caliphate b/c he performed all his duties in govt of first 3 caliphs than in his own caliphs don't be like khuwarji who hated Ahle bait how can u think of being a believer when u have hate for ahle bait and u compare them with others indeed Sahabi are most deserving of respect but Ahle bait are beyond brother many sunis have developed kind of hatred against Ahle bait in hate of shias do u think shias love ahle bait no they love what is in their favour nothing more
Gil Gavbara (ruler of dabuyid at that time)sign a peace treaty, accepted suzerainty and became vassal/tributary state of Rashidun. Therefore Dabuyid is shown as only vassal in video, not directly part of caliphate. Kindly see video carefully
@@ottomansavasc8131 For your kind information Dabuyid dynasty was vassal of Rashidun, not Umayyed. And don't compared Umayyed army with Rashidun. Because Rashidun army was way strong enough than Umayyed army.
f you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
@@TawheedPromoter crusaders lost at jerusalem but they were able to inflict heavy damage every time on the way there. also indian kings fought but lost against the muslims and were pushed back to south india. Though, the recent indian kings pushed the muslims back up to ganga river, there are many below it, but most are in the plains only now
Who thought? The tazis defeated the incompetent lizards and desert dwellers of Byzantium and the Sassanid Empire. Qadisiyeh continues No Iranian. Do not forget the real work of tazi, one day there will be no forgiveness for tazi
And the rashiddan fought in a civil war and the sassanids and the romans compined thier forces to go get rid of the muslims despite the muslims were few at this time but the muslims won so even if they were weak the muslims to any one who read history would say very hard achievment
Watch Umayyed Caliphate every year
👉ruclips.net/video/M15ZlUwS0G0/видео.html
Al salami Alaykoum , thank you very much, but please do you have informations about rashidun taking Sardinia to italy in 1:30 ?
I love my friends, I hope that in the future a united Muslim caliphate will materialize, amen, greetings from Indonesia 🇮🇩❤️
Al salami Alaykoum please do you have informations about rashidun taking Sardinia to italy in 1:30 ?
@@Khalid-Ibn-Al-Walid look it up they actually did
Early Muslim Expansion>>>>> Mongol Expansion ( Any expansion as a matter of fact)
Except there's not much destructions happened rather more to a more civilised nation. Yup.
İslam düşmanısın madem adını değiştirsene çocuk
@@nooramirulikhwan6349 lol slavery revolutions leaders murders killing pagans apostates
Mongol expansion was distraction.
Al salami Alaykoum please do you have informations about rashidun taking Sardinia to italy in 1:30 ?
Caliph omar🔥🔥😎
Are you Muslim I'm Muslim
@@hama20071 bhai name to padh lo
Check out my playlist
Tazi🤮
Killed by Abu Lulu 🌚🔪🔪🔪🔪
It's really amazing how quickly they defeated both of the super powers. There's No such other example in history
In italia si dice che: " tra due litiganti (sassanidi e bizantini) il terzo gode (arabi)" 😉
@@marcotagliavini9128 oh like Holy Roman empire and Austrain Empire attached Ottoman Empire when it was in it's weak stage at time of Timur Invasion
Well, to be honest, both the Byzantines and Sassanids (ESPECIALLY the Sassanids) were pretty much worn out from the decades of war between each other. In Persia especially, where the elites were fighting among themselves. It was a major advantage for the Arabs.
@@lekevire How could you live in a desert with a small armies and have an advantage ?? just look at the wars statics how big the disadvantage they have!
@@marcotagliavini9128 Sassanid and Byzantines got united in order to defeat Rashidun Caliphate but lost 😁 read about battle of Firaz where these two superpowers ganged up on Rashidun.
that expansion rate is just unreal....God willed it is the only explanation...especially when you take into consideration that 2 greatest powers on earth were surrounding the caliphate
This is what happens when you follow allah's orders and his prophet and this is what would happen if we were to do the same, unfortunately we are far behind doing this right now
@asahi toki well that is due to geographical reasons. It isn't the same in the rest of the Islamic world and who told you they were alone. When defeating Soviets , Usa supported them. During the American Invasion of Afghanistan the Afghans lost 90% of their country. It was just that the Americans couldn't get the Taliban out from the deep tribal structures of Afghan society. The Americans won the battles but the Afghans won the war.
@@Ismail-hx4qj I disagree. I think this is the propaganda excuse America uses to save its fragile ego. At the end of the day the Americans surrendered and retreated. They’re supposedly the worlds strongest military power. It shouldn’t matter if they have “caves to hide in”.
@asahi toki taliban did, taliban is a rebel group which disregards human rights funded by pakistan. nothing to be proud of.
@asahi toki i'm talking about the arab world my friend, the talibans are unstoppable mashallah
This is what happens when rome and persia fight a 20 year war right before arabs invade
رضی اللہ عنہ
رضي الله عنهم
Watch as the Rashidun Caliphate dismantles 2 empires with little to no effort. They really came in guns blazing.
This is called eman it took about 150 years that they reached and captured spain
yes Andalucia many sicense was there
And in 1492 they fled from spain😂😂😂😂
@@fakesrtengaming4917 yeah they fled because of their infighting between them and unluckily at same time Christian kingdoms started to unite and launched a holy war at that point there was no such eman and love for the life after they were only taking pride in the things related to this world . At that era which lam talking about no one ever could beat muslims in any battlefield because that was eman and love for Allah
@@afzalbadshahbadshah7942 thats the point if the christians were united than muslim would have not able to take down the levant😊
@@fakesrtengaming4917 muslims were such a small force they don't only had christians as their enemies the sassinads of Persia, native non Muslim Arabs and the Jews but still as I said it's not easy and untill now in history a small force having so much kinds of enemies but still they reached all over crossing levant,whole of north Africa and reaching and capturing Spain in just 150 yrs man think of it it's not easy in fact it's impossible for a normal person without the help of the Almighty Allah
Umar the great ❣️
And ottman
And Ali ra and abu Bakr ra
@@jawadsabih4979 and Usman zunoorayn ❣️❤️
@@morabitmaghribi8873 that's the greatest joke ever
إني تذكرت والذكرى مؤرقة .. مجدا تليدا بأيدينا أضعناه 💔
Avar ambassador looking at this map, after many attempts to crack the Roman empire- Well, I don't think any of the rest of us expected THAT.
How Caliph Umar RA crush Iranian empire 🤩😍😍😍
If you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
persians still have underdog psychology towards arabs ;)
@@3d8dmusic85
Arab Muslims first attacked Sassanid territory in 633, when Khalid ibn al-Walid invade masopotimia which was the political and economic centre of the Sassanid state. Following the transfer of Khalid to the Byzantine front in the Levant, the Muslims eventually lost their holdings to Sassanid counterattacks. The second Muslim invasion began in 636, under Saad ibn Abi Waqqas, when a key victory at the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah led to the permanent end of Sassanid control west of modern-day Iran. For the next six years, the Zagros Mountains, a natural barrier, marked the border between the Rashidun Caliphate and the Sassanid Empire. In 642, Umar ibn al-Khattab, then-Caliph of the Muslims, ordered a full-scale invasion of Persia by the Rashidun army, which led to the complete conquest of the Sassanid Empire by 651.
At this period Perisan have King yazdigar 3, his commanding officer was Rustom, Hormozd.
@@nabeelusmany6035 you guy's attacked them after their civil war and war with Roma stop being a 3rd party
SubhAllah Beshak Beshak Beshak Beshak
RASHİDUN CALİPHATE
Al salami Alaykoum please do you have informations about rashidun taking Sardinia to italy in 1:30 ?
Very nice 👍 keep it up 👍
Thanks for your feedback
Muhammad brave warrior
Mohammad in this time was dead this is after Mohammad
@@3d8dmusic85 no matter cus hes warrior
@@ottomansavasc8131 sallallahoalaihewasallam
@@ottomansavasc8131 if he's a warrior we cant call him a nice loving person like he's thought to be
Muslim reached sicily in rashidun caliph? never know it would be that fast
Mash Allah
What's the first music?
"God's message to the Mankind:"
*O mankind, remember the favor of Allah upon you. Is there any creator other than Allah who provides for you from the heaven and earth?*
*There is no god ˹worthy of worship˺ except Him(Allah). How can you then be deluded ˹from the truth˺?*
Qur'an (35:3)
Allah almighty says,
*Those who disbelieve(in Allah) will have a severe punishment. But those who believe and do good will have forgiveness and a great reward.*
Qur'an (35:7)
Allah almighty says,
*O mankind, indeed the promise of Allah is truth, so let not the worldly life delude you and be not deceived about Allah by the Deceiver [i.e., Satan].*
*Surely Satan(Devil) is an enemy to you, so take him as an enemy. He only invites his followers to become inmates of the Blaze(very large burning fire).*
Qur'an 35(5:6)
no
@@bytelaw1711
"WHO IS ALLAH AND POWER OF ALLAH:"
He is Allah, the One and Only. Allah is Independent of all and all are dependent on Him. Neither has He an offspring nor is He the offspring of anyone. And none is equal with Him in rank.
Quran Chep 112
There is no moving creature on the earth whose sustenance does not depend on Allah: He knows its dwelling place and its repository.
Everything has been recorded in an open register Quran (11: 6)
And Allah has brought you out from the wombs of your mothers while you know nothing. And He gave you hearing, sight, and hearts that you might give thanks (to Allah)."
Quran (16:78)
It is Allah(SWT), Who has bestowed His blessings upon you when you were in your mother's womb enveloped in darkness by three veils with no one having access to you to provide food and constituent factors of growth and upcoming existence.
He has rendered your mother's bosoms flow abundantly and has shown you the two highways of virtue and vice.
He has devoted your parents to care about, and supply you with all means of survival. Should He withhold His Mercy for just a blink of an eye, you would not survive.
Consider the food, which you eat at every meal and think from where it came?
The vegetables, grain, fruit, meat, fish, poultry, milk eggs or dairy products and so on.
Who brought forth the crops which farmers grow to be processed into delicious food?
Who created animals whose flesh may be cooked to give us sustenance, or from which milk is obtained?
Only our Creator is the Maker of provisions for us on this earth.
And surely, to gain these we need to work. Indeed prophets themselves have striven for the sake of obtaining sustenance.
@@Iamthewarner557 no
@@bytelaw1711 why?
@@szerek3196 Hohoho
That was really fast expansion
First song name?
4yaar Nabi jaante hara sahabye nabi Alabata bhe jaante jaante
Hazrat Umar🔥
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
“What a pleasant day to live in Roman egy-“
So just mind that Hazar Turks stopped the expansion of Islam into the wider European region in the Caucasus. If Islamic armies were victorious over the Turkic tribes, nothing would stop their passage into the vast, unprotected Eurasian plain. Armies of the Caliphate would appear right at the doorstep of Slavic and Baltic tribes. This is kinda unknown, but a very important event that has come to steer the course of modern history.
@Sacred Warrior Yeap that too.
They stopped because of the mountains in the area. Additionally, Caliph Omar did not want to expand more because he wanted to maintain his new conquered lands and to not over extend his supply lines. Even in Egypt he was hesitant to invade it and he sent a message to Amer the general of the muslim army that was going to take Egypt to stand down but Amer did not open the message until he reached Egypt and started his conquest.
Does the Turkish government teach about how bad the Muslims treated the turks in the pagan period with wars and enslavement or do they just brush it off
@@yagizkart1
Wrong, the Turks were defeated and the Khagan was captured by himself and converted to Islam and the Khazar state became affiliated with the Caliphate since the year 737. I advise you to read the campaigns of Muslimah bin Abdul Malik and Marwan bin Muhammad against the Khazars, who stopped the caliphate, which is the devastating civil wars and the rebellions of the leaders. Take, for example, the war between the Yemeni armies and the Qaysiyah In Spain and France, he caused more losses than the Franks and the Goths
@@yagizkart1
The only era in which there were no problems was the era of Al-Walid bin Abdul-Malik (705-715). During his reign, the whole of Central Asia was conquered by Qutayba bin Muslim, the invasion of Anatolia by Maslama bin Abdul-Malik, the invasion of North Africa by Musa bin Nusayr and then headed To invade and conquer Iberia in just 4 years also attake suoth france, the commander Ibn al-Qasim also conquered Sindh and parts of northern India
Hey isnt the sasanid first and then egypt ?
khalid bin waleed RAW conquered these lands under hazrat abubaker RAW
*Like a flood that swallows everything before it...*
Based Sahaba
I don't think Bahrain was under the rule of the Persian at the time because from what I remember in school the teachers told me that Prophet Muhammad also sent a letter to the ruler of Bahrain who also ruled Yemen if I am not wrong his name was mundan Bin Sawan
please do mesopotamia
Nice
Thanks ❤️
Khalifas omar
Crazy
Caliph hazrat Ali (RA) and hazrat Islam (RA)📣
Islamic
Caliph othman❤
Where were the Ghassanids?
Umar The 👍
Very incorrect map.
Bulgarians arent slavs at that time, there were more thracians than slavs in Bulgaria, same as now
Also, Caucasians are under Khazar control that era, not Turks.
Bulgarian. Are Turkic
@@GreatTurkicKhagnate Not true.
But if you ask me I would prefer if we had more turkic people that slavic.
But thracians are majority theb are slavs and then turkics which are very low btw
The bulgarians at that time still lived in and around crimea, its even shown on the map
4 Yarr a Nabi jaante hai 5tana bhe jaante
Gokturk Khanate , Khazar Empire, Avar Khanate. God bless the Turkics.
@Mehmed Islyamov i dont know abt turks but for us muslims islam comes first above all then race or nation or anyother thing for that matter
@@MohsinRaza-uq2ow Kutayba bin Muslims and the Umayyads did nothing but attack the Turkics. By the way, I love being Turkish more than anything else. HOW HAPPY IS THE ONE WHO SAYS I AM A TURK.
@@cihanturan7398 if you turks had not accepted islam, you would remain in those desert plains of central asia. Your ancestors would feel ashame of you watching you taking pride in your race and not you religion first
29 years 🥵
Mashallah 🔥🔥
Hello kim jong un
Jai Shree Ram 🚩
Hazrat Ali and Hazrat Hassan the fifth Khalifa
How that caliphate conquered Georgia while we know at 736 battle of Anakopia Georgians beat Arabs? Who ya Lying to😂😂
Hazırlar did lose
What. in 636 Arab never reached georgai you are crazy.
Bro umayyed empire was Spain to india gujrat
لعن الله علی بنی امیه . لعن الله علی آل اباسفیان . لعن الله شمرا . لعن الله یزیدا خامسا . لعن الله معاویه بن اباسفیان .
France to India
And yet rome outlived it
Rashidun didn't pursue Romans anymore, that's why they could outlive.
@@BoyBoy-uq4dh they tried to siege constantopole 4 times dawg
@@matijas7994 when?
Good thing those 3 evil empires fell.
Name 1 empire that wasn't evil and didn't fall. Yeah.
@@portgasempire7867
The Manichean Uyghur Khanate but they too fell. ;-;7
الخليفه عثمان بن عفان رضي الله عنه 😎💯🤍
They didn't go that deep to Anatolia
Byzantines and sassanids should have worked together
They did but failed, even China failed. You can't stop the unstoppable.
@@rimacalid6557 well byzantines and sassanians were Both at there lowest points and were Both weak after a decade of war
Even if they worked together. No power in earth could stop KHALID. BIN WALID R.A.
@- EVIL the caliphate was very powerful but would not win from Both sassanians and byzantines at their full strenght
@- EVIL its not about numbers, its about tactics, and with full strenght i ment that they were able to create new armies fast
And what about Hazrat Ali (R.A)?
@ME VLOG he should have mentioned him as well
Rashidun caliphate the body umayyad caliphate the left hand fatimid caliphate the right hand abbasid caliphate the golden age
😁😁😁😁😁😁
Al salami Alaykoum please do you have informations about rashidun taking Sardinia to italy in 1:30 ?
😒😒😒
Arab history
@- EVIL back then muslim were only arabs also islam has no history nor culture islam is just a religion
We're proud of it
No Islamic
@@fore4word_748 Muslims today were not Muslims in time of (rashidun umayyad abbasids)
@@user-cw2ph6xi1q they all fought in the name of Islam not in the name of Arabs
why u name khazars turks
because they are turk
@@Uzey1453 Its like naming rashidun caliphate semitic caliphate
but why naming them "turks" like khazars are enough
muslims dont have copyright for turks, turls were buddhists, jewish and tengri too
westren khanate is also turks why its sepratly written as turks and westren khanate
Rashidun did not conquer the Sassanids.The northern part of Iran was conquered during the Abbasid period.
Umm yes they did They Conquered almost all areas of Sassanids in battles of Al Qadissiya battle of Jahavan etc. Up until the Sassanids were officially finished.
f you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
@@3d8dmusic85 Who studies late Sassanid history of a bunch of Weakling Fodders? Sassanid was a Vast empire State Stretching from Iran to Afghanistan. By War Standards Sassanids Had much better equipment and veteran soldiers Veteran Generals Imperial monarchy Their Country underwent a so called Civil Disruption which wasn't even that much of a big deal that Sassanids couldn't even fight and just rolled over to the Arabs.
And a Kid took over the responsibility as a king is a blame which should be placed upon the Sassanids not the Arabs. The Arabs Gave the Sassanids Two ultimatum Either pay Jizya Or be Muslim or get your military in gear up and running and for battle.
Battle of Dhi Qar when the Sassanids invaded Arabia Got Destroyed by The Pagan Arabs(Pre islamic Arabia). And during the muslim Expansion The Sassanids in every major Battles Placed Massive number of Soldiers Than the Muslims And still lost. And Don't play The Oh If We weren't at war we would have Crushed the muslims accept your Defeat like real men don't cry like a 12 yr old.
The Sassanids Had the Romans backing them up With a coalition and still lost. And this is just blatant Stupidity. A desert dwelling People With no empire ,No economy, Tribal differences Civil war And power struggle People Who had No Large war experience came and Crushed two of the biggest Empires In the World Who Fought Countless And had Large economy Trade Infrastructure veteran Military Generals Seasoned Tactician. And still ended up losing to the muslims Cry a river Over it. Even if they were at their peak They will still be nothing in front of Rashidun Remember that. Also The Arabs themselves had Civil wars fitna wars And fought Tyranny amongst themselves And Still were man Enough to Solo Both super powers at the same time. Also your greatest generals and commanders died? What a bunch of BS. The very difference is The Arabs are true believers and ready to lay their life for God While Enemies fear their lives.
PRETTY sure axum still had the Sudanese coast until southern egypt at the time of the rashidun caliphate
And then losing all
Lol. Which universe do you live in? Islam until now exists in all of these places. Lost what?
The one in Caucus this era called Khazar not Turks.
Khazars are Turks.
Ya Ali
شيعااااا
Can ali hear you in his grave? No ali ( may Allah be pleased with him ) is dead unable to hear or talk to you but Allah is the one who never dies so ask him instead
rafidi
They didnt take carthage
It was vassal of Rashidun
Actually, they already didn't fight Muslims, they just decided to be one of their own and eventually became a Muslim state.
يا علي 🇮🇶🦁⚔️
الامام علي هوة الخليفة الاول لرسول
شيعي لا احد يصدقه ، Shiite no one believes him
@@KSA07 صايم هسة اني ورة الفطور ارد عليك..
@@user-jm3sk8gy4s و هذي هي تبغى تسبني بعد الفطور و الدين ينهى عن هذا الشيء
@@KSA07 و الدين ايضا ينهي عن تفرقة وطائفية يا ايها المسلم الموحد🤔.
@@user-jm3sk8gy4s نهى عنها بمعنى لا تخرجوا و تبتكروا طوائف جديدة
Yeah let's not mention how it collapsed. The video is incomplete.
the correct is transfering
Inaccurate, the rashidun caliphate never attacked the Turks, since it was a hadith to not attack the Turks.
The Turks?
@@dingdong5908 yep, the western khanate, the turks, or avars. All turkish
الا ارسل عثمان بن عفان رضي الله عنه جيوش لفتح بلاد الترك
Sorry which turks you are takling about?
حرام الكذب على رسول فلا حديث يحرم مقاتلة الترك لستم اصحاب دم أزرق
The Rashidun Caliphate never encroached on Byzantine Anatolia or Byzantine Africa. these events only happed after the Umayyads took over.
Rashidun reached till Ankara city and reached deep into Anatolia. All of west Anatolia & also parts of east Anatolia was conquered by Rashidun. They reached till wall of Constantinople.
Just search on
*Battle* *of* *Mast* *(654)*
*Siege* *of* *Constantinople* *(654)*
You will know
@@shakeelofficial6418 that was the ummsyad caliphate in the 1st arab seige of Constantinople. The occupation you've described was also extremely temporary, with contantine IV defeating many in the battles using fireships.
I'd actually like to correct my self here, as it was the Rashidun who made inroads into Anatolia and besieged Constantinople at that time, but they weren't in a position to gain much. the campaign was mainly by sea, and not by actual land. I am unfamiliar with any Muslim acquisition of Ancyra, but all of Anatolia was firmly in byzantine hands after the second Arab siege of Constantinople, showing little to no consequence if it was at all captured
@@eneytkachenko3854
Rashidun caliphate defeated roman/bzyantine army in western Anatolia in
*Siege* *of* *Germanicia* *(638)*
In 654, Rashidun governor Moavia successfully captured Ankara city.
@@shakeelofficial6418 false, as Arabs had by that time fully consolidated syria, but could not capture Anatolian cities.
all first 3 caliphs RA did great job in conquest but Hazrat AS did not conquered land in his caliphate bcz of civil war and turmoil started by khuwarijoon in last muwaya snatched his legal caliphate illegally and caliphate of Imam Hussian AS
Note : I'm suni but i follow hadith
One of identification of hypocrites is that they hate Ali AS
How Powerful and enthusiastic names are of Rashidun RA💞
@Araf Tamim Astaghfarullah
inshaAllah u willbe with yazid LA at the day of judgement
they illegally took power by fighting with hazrat Ali AS
hypocrite wahabi keep loving yazid LA who wanted to change islam by his own will
let us love Hussian AS who gave everything in path of Allah to save islam
@Araf Tamim curse be upon yazid the master of infidels the father of shaitan
Muawiyah RA was praised by the prophet Muhammad ﷺ and is part of a saved group because he led the first naval expedition and there's a hadith where the prophet Muhammad ﷺ said that the first Muslims to take part in a naval expedition and the first Muslims to attempt to take Constantinople will enter into Jannah. The reason why Muawiyah RA fought Ali RA was because he wanted justice for Uthman RA. Both of them were in the wrong for fighting each other but Ali RA was closer to the truth. We love both of them and pray that Allah forgives any mistakes they may have made and enters them into Jannah.
@@thecoolestfaisal Ali AS can never be wrong only these statements willbe from mouth of hypocrites
Muwaya RA was wrong indeed
don't compare Shan e Ali AS with muwaya RA or any other sahabi he was greatest of all of sahabis his wife is khaton e janat his sons are Prince of heavens his blood is holy blood of prophet saww indeed ❤💞
@@thecoolestfaisal brother i don't know why sunis try to balance Maqam of Ali AS with other sahabis knowing that he was most praised by prophet saww and Holy sahabis like Abu bakar RA,OmarRaa ,Usman RA and many more he is one who did most serives of Rashduen caliphate b/c he performed all his duties in govt of first 3 caliphs than in his own caliphs
don't be like khuwarji who hated Ahle bait
how can u think of being a believer when u have hate for ahle bait and u compare them with others
indeed Sahabi are most deserving of respect but Ahle bait are beyond brother
many sunis have developed kind of hatred against Ahle bait in hate of shias
do u think shias love ahle bait no they love what is in their favour nothing more
Rashidun never conquer dabuyid dynasty this is fake
Gil Gavbara (ruler of dabuyid at that time)sign a peace treaty, accepted suzerainty and became vassal/tributary state of Rashidun. Therefore Dabuyid is shown as only vassal in video, not directly part of caliphate.
Kindly see video carefully
@@empiresmapping4114 they was not vassal dabuyid even beat ummayed army killed their commander
@@ottomansavasc8131
For your kind information
Dabuyid dynasty was vassal of Rashidun, not Umayyed. And don't compared Umayyed army with Rashidun. Because Rashidun army was way strong enough than Umayyed army.
@@empiresmapping4114 Yes you right but Ummayed even enter the europe conquered spain
f you studied the late Sassanid history and how the Arabs entered it, you would find that the Arabs were not powerful, but the Iranians were at war with each other in their own country.And all the great soldiers and commanders were killed, and even at the time of the Arab invasion a three-year-old child was king, and before that several kings who ruled for only a few months, even two women, but the Arabs attacked when a child sat on the throne.
And then Hazrat Muawiya came along and ruined it all
R u Muslim or shia?
@@nknawaz4 I am sunni alhamdullilah but you can't deny what he did. He ruined the perfect Islamic caliphate and established a dynasty like the romans
معاوية صحابي مسلم خال المؤمنين
لا يحق لك طعن فيه ولك إثم على ذلك
@@nknawaz4 هو شعوبي عنصري يريد طعن في العرب عبر معاوية رضي الله عنه
@@aboyousef5321 idk what the language is, translate it to English pls
Thanks to Crusaders and Indian kings. They efforts stopped the barbaric forces and we get a democratic liberal permissive world.
You're talking like arabs wanted to invade Europe
Democratic? Liberal? In Europe and India in 7 century?
Hold up crusaders lost and what did Indian kings achived
@@TawheedPromoter crusaders lost at jerusalem but they were able to inflict heavy damage every time on the way there. also indian kings fought but lost against the muslims and were pushed back to south india. Though, the recent indian kings pushed the muslims back up to ganga river, there are many below it, but most are in the plains only now
@@arch357 crusaders only killed unarmed children and women
Because of crusade Christian theocracies came to end in Europe
Who thought? The tazis defeated the incompetent lizards and desert dwellers of Byzantium and the Sassanid Empire. Qadisiyeh continues No Iranian. Do not forget the real work of tazi, one day there will be no forgiveness for tazi
کص نگو بچه فاشیست چرا به پدرانت فحش میدی بی هویت ؟😂😂😂
عمر یه کار درست کرد اونم ازاد سازی ایرانیان از وجود نحص مجوسی ها بود😉🇮🇷☪️
اوبی عکس پروفایلت عکس یه جنگجو عربه😂😂😂😂😉
@@Slave_of_Islam جنگجو عربه😂 از کجا فهمیدی کلک؟
@@Slave_of_Islam ruclips.net/video/yPsUxLLeV1E/видео.html
@@Slave_of_Islam حس نمیکنی استعداد پیشگوی بالای داری این کجاش تازیه
Fight 2 weakened...wouldn't call it great empire..i would say lucky
And the rashiddan fought in a civil war and the sassanids and the romans compined thier forces to go get rid of the muslims despite the muslims were few at this time but the muslims won so even if they were weak the muslims to any one who read history would say very hard achievment
@- EVIL dude please respect others and dont insult them would be better can you?