I came back to game after 6 years. And started to talk about CV's at chat. Then some CV lover started to talk some wierd things that CV are hard to play. I wrote that " how bad are you in that game when CV's are hard to play for you ? " Then he goes in berserker mode at chat. :D
My highest was 333k in it. Luckily I got 337k in thunderer so I'm not a dirty cv main Highest eagle was 250k. But both even in a quick game minimum of 150k
I would love this, how does it compare to the Eagle or Malta, not as it matters much as I canno tplay CV's for shit, but it still looks nice, is the torp spread as bad as the midways?
Hi there - as someone who sometimes watches content but has never played the game, I wanted to ask about something, if I might. It seems as though a general practice is to dump an initial strike immediately on takeoff at no target. I presume there is sometimes a substantial advantage to this - could someone take a moment to let me know what this is? Thanks!
Saving planes. Most people will only do one strike per squad. If a squad has 3 strikes then you keep one for the strike, one to eat damage, abs one dumped into the sea
Not really a huge advantage, just a play style choice. Like Josiah said, it saves planes. This, IMO, is more important on your first couple of strikes since your planes are the primary source of initial spotting, so you are likely to run into much heavier AA because the enemy ships are still relatively close together at the start and they haven't received any damage, so all their AA mounts are operational. After the first couple of strikes, you should have a good idea of the enemy's position and then can pick and choose your targets and attack routes to minimize losing planes.
It seems WG loves their passive damage income bullshit. It's the exact same horseshit with arty in WoT and carriers in WoWs - clickers are treated like royalty and any nerfs they introduce to the class are from negligible to non-existent.
You can see the pain in his face as he is just demolishing these poor warship players. No joy in this for Trenlass but he is fighting the good fight in documenting how broken these cvs actually are and what they are doing to the game. True cognitive dissonance going on here.
I came back to game after 6 years. And started to talk about CV's at chat. Then some CV lover started to talk some wierd things that CV are hard to play. I wrote that " how bad are you in that game when CV's are hard to play for you ? " Then he goes in berserker mode at chat. :D
WOW no one has totally ever said this exact same thing
It is impressive to watch you flex your skill to prevail in this challenging match.
My highest was 333k in it. Luckily I got 337k in thunderer so I'm not a dirty cv main
Highest eagle was 250k. But both even in a quick game minimum of 150k
I would love this, how does it compare to the Eagle or Malta, not as it matters much as I canno tplay CV's for shit, but it still looks nice, is the torp spread as bad as the midways?
torp spread is great if you let it aim first
@@trenlass809 Thats the thing, any variation in coures disrupts the spread, to hold on course, your planes simply get melted by AA
Tell this the player of a United States in game I had a few days ago. Person had a 44% win rate overall and man did he suck at "Easy" mode.
it`s not just boring to play CV, it`s even boring to watch...still love you though!
The power of the mighty left click :O
Hi there - as someone who sometimes watches content but has never played the game, I wanted to ask about something, if I might. It seems as though a general practice is to dump an initial strike immediately on takeoff at no target. I presume there is sometimes a substantial advantage to this - could someone take a moment to let me know what this is?
Thanks!
Saving planes. Most people will only do one strike per squad. If a squad has 3 strikes then you keep one for the strike, one to eat damage, abs one dumped into the sea
Not really a huge advantage, just a play style choice. Like Josiah said, it saves planes. This, IMO, is more important on your first couple of strikes since your planes are the primary source of initial spotting, so you are likely to run into much heavier AA because the enemy ships are still relatively close together at the start and they haven't received any damage, so all their AA mounts are operational. After the first couple of strikes, you should have a good idea of the enemy's position and then can pick and choose your targets and attack routes to minimize losing planes.
@@Joze1090 Ok, makes sense, thanks!
@@lordec911 Gotcha - that makes sense, thank you for the reply!
Trenlass, you're a nasty boi behind a squad of planes :p
They should let the subs sit at the back of the map and fire 25km guided torps at the enemy. Would be no different! All the no risk gameplay is silly
Sub-par carrier player still able to knock on 200k damage. Just makes you wonder how bad the WG testers are that they think these are balanced.
It seems WG loves their passive damage income bullshit. It's the exact same horseshit with arty in WoT and carriers in WoWs - clickers are treated like royalty and any nerfs they introduce to the class are from negligible to non-existent.
👌.
You can see the pain in his face as he is just demolishing these poor warship players. No joy in this for Trenlass but he is fighting the good fight in documenting how broken these cvs actually are and what they are doing to the game. True cognitive dissonance going on here.