We got a lot of hinduphobic feminist here i dont understand where they find all misogyny lol In sanatan dharma wife refer to as arhdhagini means a part of body I think feminist need to focus on other religion where marrige refer as contract
Kanya var se yeh bhi keheti hai ki jivan me bohot se vipada aayegi aur aapke kandhe par bhar aayega. Aur, tabhi ussi situation me pati ka kartavya hota hai ki woh pure ghar ka ek group leader ki tarah uss situation ko handle kare. Issi liye pandit ji ne kaha kanya se ki aapko aagyapalika hona hai ussi situation me. Aur sirf patni ko hi nhi uske bacche ko bhi aagya palan karne ki jarurat hai kewal aur kewal jab purush kisi dukh ke samay ko handle kar raha ho har samay nhi. Iska arth yeh nahi hai ki pati ko patni par aadesh dene ka adhikaar ho gya ya patni ko slave ban jana chahiye. Esa nhi hai. Jivan me jab aarthik tangi ho rhi ho toh pati ko bhi apni patni ki baat ko aagya ki tarah maan kar palan karna chahiye. Agar woh bol rhi hai ki yaha paise karch nhi Karna toh nhi karna chahiye. Agar woh bachaye hue paise de rhi hai toh chup chap le jana chahiye. Yaha iss sthiti me patni group leader ki tarah situation handle karti hai. Issi liye dono rath ke pahiye ki tarah hain.
Last wala jo bataya yeh kahin nhi likha gya hai ki pati gussa hone par patni per pade. Yeh panditji ne man se bola hai. Jab maa kali gussa hui thi toh shiv ji unke peron ke nicche aa gye the. Yaha toh pati patni ke per ke nicche aa gye. Abb panditji jaiye aur unko samajhaye shiv shakti ko😂
The word is spelt 'Misogynist' which means a bachelor or man who despises women. These beautiful vows are social vows to protect a woman and to bring the man close to his wife and understand it's his responsibility to look after a woman he chose to share the rest of his life with and who left everything to be with him as his wife and who naturally do these things to her husband( love, feed protect share etc etc) In the western world, it's naturally accepted a man will do these things for his wife and visa versa and do them because the couple fall in love and this is what you do to each naturally. These vows are a reminder and a blessing and teachings from an elder/respected person of the community ( from days when things and sentiments were different and more innocent) and is a beautiful thing Hindu weddings have as a reminder and is romantic. I am surprised why some Indians are so embarrassed about their beautiful rich scientific cultural ways religious ways!
@@memanuel5299 Bro we are not embarrassed of our culture. This lady Samriddhi in my opinion may be is some sort of fake feminist. We just love our culture and as far as feminism is considered. To clear it out , Almost all of the beloved gods(except the celibate ones) are identified from their wives. Exmple - Siya ke Ram (Siya's husband Rama) So its a women first sort of culture but it is required to have a pure heart to see this beauty otherwise you know, what I mean. Beauty lies in the eyes of viewer and so do disgust.
@@informalaccount.957 I totally agree and see that women are given high platforms even in your gods and goddesses, You guys need to defend and spread the goodness and not allow criminal behaviour to represent your ways. I never ee Hindus defend themselves when rubbish and lies are spread about them and their ways Glad you are proud of your rich culture.
@@memanuel5299The promises done by the husband to his wife are majorily about providing her and asking her before any major decision. Whereas, the promises done by the wife to her husband are not exactly promises. They are conditions put forth that if you will be polite, leave anger and laziness(which are basic human traits), take care of the elders of my family, obey me, then only I will accept you as my wife. These may be valid 50 years ago, but not today. As the time changes, the rituals and customs also demand change with the changing mindset of the people.
@@memanuel5299 I am not embarassed of my culture, nor I will be in the future. All the rituals and customs were made for a purpose. A 100 years ago, women did not earn. But now, more than half of them are independent and are working. Even then, they are expected to do all the chores and 'duties' of a wife and a bahu, along with her career. Whereas the man is just expected to 'earn'. Look around yourself, you will find numerous such examples, only if you LOOK. The rituals just demand changes with the changing time.
How come the guy gets all the finance and daan dharma vachans and the girl gets all keep ME happy and FOLLOW ME.. AND BE MY AGYAPAALIKA .... and beg to forgive and reduce anger....the groom gets to leave the house when he is angry but the wife needs to beg and touch his feet to reduce his anger...this is pure misogyny...
I am a woman and I don't feel these vows are misogynist. Men have testesterons they are built differently than woman. So men getting angry and agressive is normal, but he should not harm his loved ones, so its better he leaves the house. Women are nurturers, they are naturally tilted towards forgiving attitude. But yes touching husbands feet to calm him down is wrong. also finances are responsibility of men since ancient times, while woman manages the house.
Guru ji is video me ladke ke vachan to thik hai lekin ladki ke vachan sahi nahi hai kyuki aaj kal ki janration me jo shadiya ho rahi hai na to ladka koi kam Hai kisi kam me or na hi koi ladki ab meri wali ko hi dekh lo pure din phone chalegi khana dal ke dene ki kahao to kahti hai apne aap kha lo kapde dhone ki kaho to kahti hai aapne aap dho le ja kar or na hi iron karti hai kapdo par or ulte javab deti hai roj or bina puche chali jati hai kahi jana ho to mujse to kuch bhi nahi samajti wo ab aap hi batao me kya karu
Kartavya is not about tit for tat. One party should keep on adhering to their duties. You can just explain them and keep on explaining them. A mother doesn't leave the child if he/she doesn't obey her. She goes over and above her duty most of the times. Same goes in loyalty and marriage. One side must keep on fulfilling their duties to the maximum extent without breaking themselves or being taken advantage of.
Accha..aur baaki sare vachan jo ladke ne maane, woh sb kya the? Jb ladka apna sb kuch dene ka promise kr skta hai toh bdle mein same expect kyu nhi kr skta? Dimag khol lo Thora.. Get Outta woke textbooks and be practical..
@@poeticperoxide1236 sab kuch Dena aur slavery ek chiz nahi ha. If the guy had asked the same promises as the bride then it wouldn't be wrong like loyalty, support, respect etc but he is basically asking her to become his life time slave. Whatever is her is anyways will be his property by default so why should he ask such inhuman thing? Why should she support him in everything? If he does a crime then she should support him? If he does domestic violence then she should support him? What a misogynistic culture it is. This is exactly the root cause of all sufferings and discriminations women have always faced throughout history. She has her own mind and thoughts why should she become a slave and just say yes in everything? Disgusting how ppl even support these things and then they will cry about why so much hate aginst men. Men are not trustworthy and we have seen it's evidence throughout history so this promise is just suicide and nothing else.
@I. let's talk about it point wise.. You said, should she support him in crime? I think you didn't watch the video property. Coz Panditji mentions that Wife will take half of the punya done by husband but will NEVER be the part of his wrongdoings. Secondly, These rituals were written atleast 2000 years ago..Coz sanskrit is a very old language. Also the culture itself is extremely ancient. So with time the CONNOTATIONS of meaning have changed. Aagyapalika DOES NOT literally translate to SLAVE, mind you. With evolving time, it simply means respecting your husband and valuing his opinions as he'll do to you. Thirdly, NO SANE PERSON CAN EVER SUPPORT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Shastras also say that God only resides in a place where women is worshipped. So a man who does domestic violence is NOT protected by HINDU rituals or Vedas in ANY WAY, unlike other religions where husband can get divorce from by wife by sending messages on whatsapp.
@@poeticperoxide1236 not being accountable doesn't mean that she can say aginst it. It doesn't matter when and where richuals were written. No where he said that husband should be Agyapati. Their is a line in valmiki ramayan that a husband is like a God wife and no matter how good or bad he is she should always support him. And in same ramayan Sita was expected to give agni pariksha to proven her purity while no one ever questioned the purity of ram. Why? Because his work can define him wrong or write but he can't be impure no matter what he does. Husband never faces any huge consequences for any of his crime but wife is expected to be pure and if she is not then she is a trash. It doesn't matter even if she was kidnapped or forced but still she is the one to be blamed.
![MAF Teeski - Whole Thing (feat. VonOff1700) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SHWEj-ndz6g/mqdefault.jpg)
May god bless the couple..
Kash log eatna hi dil se swekaar kare or nibhaye to riste kabhi divorce ki nobat hi na aaye
Om
We got a lot of hinduphobic feminist here i dont understand where they find all misogyny lol
In sanatan dharma wife refer to as arhdhagini means a part of body
I think feminist need to focus on other religion where marrige refer as contract
Kanya var se yeh bhi keheti hai ki jivan me bohot se vipada aayegi aur aapke kandhe par bhar aayega.
Aur, tabhi ussi situation me pati ka kartavya hota hai ki woh pure ghar ka ek group leader ki tarah uss situation ko handle kare. Issi liye pandit ji ne kaha kanya se ki aapko aagyapalika hona hai ussi situation me. Aur sirf patni ko hi nhi uske bacche ko bhi aagya palan karne ki jarurat hai kewal aur kewal jab purush kisi dukh ke samay ko handle kar raha ho har samay nhi.
Iska arth yeh nahi hai ki pati ko patni par aadesh dene ka adhikaar ho gya ya patni ko slave ban jana chahiye.
Esa nhi hai.
Jivan me jab aarthik tangi ho rhi ho toh pati ko bhi apni patni ki baat ko aagya ki tarah maan kar palan karna chahiye. Agar woh bol rhi hai ki yaha paise karch nhi Karna toh nhi karna chahiye. Agar woh bachaye hue paise de rhi hai toh chup chap le jana chahiye. Yaha iss sthiti me patni group leader ki tarah situation handle karti hai. Issi liye dono rath ke pahiye ki tarah hain.
Rao sahab
Nice video
Last wala jo bataya yeh kahin nhi likha gya hai ki pati gussa hone par patni per pade. Yeh panditji ne man se bola hai.
Jab maa kali gussa hui thi toh shiv ji unke peron ke nicche aa gye the. Yaha toh pati patni ke per ke nicche aa gye. Abb panditji jaiye aur unko samajhaye shiv shakti ko😂
Shadi ke saat vachno ke chhakkar mai jindgi jhand ho rakhi hai sabki
और कुछ वचन में मांगना चाहता हूँ
अगर में वचन न दू तो
Ye to Puri kahani PTA Raha h
Or ye bore ho rahe h
sath vachan nibane chaye
Pati to nibate h per patni agar na nibaye
Nark ka dawar kholegi apne liye
Is javab jarur batao
Outdated
@@peoplepeople9861 yes
The seven pheras are so patriarchial & misoginistic.. and so do this pandit ji..!!
The word is spelt 'Misogynist' which means a bachelor or man who despises women. These beautiful vows are social vows to protect a woman and to bring the man close to his wife and understand it's his responsibility to look after a woman he chose to share the rest of his life with and who left everything to be with him as his wife and who naturally do these things to her husband( love, feed protect share etc etc) In the western world, it's naturally accepted a man will do these things for his wife and visa versa and do them because the couple fall in love and this is what you do to each naturally. These vows are a reminder and a blessing and teachings from an elder/respected person of the community ( from days when things and sentiments were different and more innocent) and is a beautiful thing Hindu weddings have as a reminder and is romantic. I am surprised why some Indians are so embarrassed about their beautiful rich scientific cultural ways religious ways!
@@memanuel5299 Bro we are not embarrassed of our culture. This lady Samriddhi in my opinion may be is some sort of fake feminist. We just love our culture and as far as feminism is considered. To clear it out , Almost all of the beloved gods(except the celibate ones) are identified from their wives.
Exmple - Siya ke Ram (Siya's husband Rama)
So its a women first sort of culture but it is required to have a pure heart to see this beauty otherwise you know, what I mean.
Beauty lies in the eyes of viewer and so do disgust.
@@informalaccount.957 I totally agree and see that women are given high platforms even in your gods and goddesses, You guys need to defend and spread the goodness and not allow criminal behaviour to represent your ways. I never ee Hindus defend themselves when rubbish and lies are spread about them and their ways
Glad you are proud of your rich culture.
@@memanuel5299The promises done by the husband to his wife are majorily about providing her and asking her before any major decision.
Whereas, the promises done by the wife to her husband are not exactly promises. They are conditions put forth that if you will be polite, leave anger and laziness(which are basic human traits), take care of the elders of my family, obey me, then only I will accept you as my wife.
These may be valid 50 years ago, but not today. As the time changes, the rituals and customs also demand change with the changing mindset of the people.
@@memanuel5299 I am not embarassed of my culture, nor I will be in the future. All the rituals and customs were made for a purpose. A 100 years ago, women did not earn. But now, more than half of them are independent and are working. Even then, they are expected to do all the chores and 'duties' of a wife and a bahu, along with her career. Whereas the man is just expected to 'earn'. Look around yourself, you will find numerous such examples, only if you LOOK.
The rituals just demand changes with the changing time.
ye sab kuch ka bachan ha me de do fr to lalu banke baith jao ladki to sida sar pe nachegi
Badi dukhi lag rahi hai
How come the guy gets all the finance and daan dharma vachans and the girl gets all keep ME happy and FOLLOW ME.. AND BE MY AGYAPAALIKA .... and beg to forgive and reduce anger....the groom gets to leave the house when he is angry but the wife needs to beg and touch his feet to reduce his anger...this is pure misogyny...
I am a woman and I don't feel these vows are misogynist. Men have testesterons they are built differently than woman. So men getting angry and agressive is normal, but he should not harm his loved ones, so its better he leaves the house. Women are nurturers, they are naturally tilted towards forgiving attitude. But yes touching husbands feet to calm him down is wrong.
also finances are responsibility of men since ancient times, while woman manages the house.
Hinduphobic feminist
...yeah pure mysogyn. I suggest you get married to a woman and allow her the freedom to sleep with anyone and everyone. Keep her free. 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂wah didi itna bhi hinduphobic nhi hona tha
@@crayon7369queen 👑
Guru ji is video me ladke ke vachan to thik hai lekin ladki ke vachan sahi nahi hai kyuki aaj kal ki janration me jo shadiya ho rahi hai na to ladka koi kam Hai kisi kam me or na hi koi ladki ab meri wali ko hi dekh lo pure din phone chalegi khana dal ke dene ki kahao to kahti hai apne aap kha lo kapde dhone ki kaho to kahti hai aapne aap dho le ja kar or na hi iron karti hai kapdo par or ulte javab deti hai roj or bina puche chali jati hai kahi jana ho to mujse to kuch bhi nahi samajti wo ab aap hi batao me kya karu
और अगर वचन देने के बाद पत्नी ने न निभाए तो
Pati kitne nibhate hain 😂
Nark ka dawar kholegi apne liye
Iske bad to de chapal de chapal😅
Kartavya is not about tit for tat.
One party should keep on adhering to their duties.
You can just explain them and keep on explaining them.
A mother doesn't leave the child if he/she doesn't obey her.
She goes over and above her duty most of the times.
Same goes in loyalty and marriage.
One side must keep on fulfilling their duties to the maximum extent without breaking themselves or being taken advantage of.
The last vachan of being 'agya palika' was really misogynistic
Accha..aur baaki sare vachan jo ladke ne maane, woh sb kya the?
Jb ladka apna sb kuch dene ka promise kr skta hai toh bdle mein same expect kyu nhi kr skta?
Dimag khol lo Thora..
Get Outta woke textbooks and be practical..
@@poeticperoxide1236 sab kuch Dena aur slavery ek chiz nahi ha. If the guy had asked the same promises as the bride then it wouldn't be wrong like loyalty, support, respect etc but he is basically asking her to become his life time slave.
Whatever is her is anyways will be his property by default so why should he ask such inhuman thing?
Why should she support him in everything? If he does a crime then she should support him? If he does domestic violence then she should support him? What a misogynistic culture it is.
This is exactly the root cause of all sufferings and discriminations women have always faced throughout history.
She has her own mind and thoughts why should she become a slave and just say yes in everything? Disgusting how ppl even support these things and then they will cry about why so much hate aginst men.
Men are not trustworthy and we have seen it's evidence throughout history so this promise is just suicide and nothing else.
@@poeticperoxide1236 after seeing this video and ppl's reaction now I know why feminists say that all religions are anti women
@I. let's talk about it point wise..
You said, should she support him in crime?
I think you didn't watch the video property. Coz Panditji mentions that Wife will take half of the punya done by husband but will NEVER be the part of his wrongdoings.
Secondly,
These rituals were written atleast 2000 years ago..Coz sanskrit is a very old language. Also the culture itself is extremely ancient. So with time the CONNOTATIONS of meaning have changed.
Aagyapalika DOES NOT literally translate to SLAVE, mind you. With evolving time, it simply means respecting your husband and valuing his opinions as he'll do to you.
Thirdly,
NO SANE PERSON CAN EVER SUPPORT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Shastras also say that God only resides in a place where women is worshipped. So a man who does domestic violence is NOT protected by HINDU rituals or Vedas in ANY WAY, unlike other religions where husband can get divorce from by wife by sending messages on whatsapp.
@@poeticperoxide1236 not being accountable doesn't mean that she can say aginst it.
It doesn't matter when and where richuals were written. No where he said that husband should be Agyapati.
Their is a line in valmiki ramayan that a husband is like a God wife and no matter how good or bad he is she should always support him. And in same ramayan Sita was expected to give agni pariksha to proven her purity while no one ever questioned the purity of ram. Why? Because his work can define him wrong or write but he can't be impure no matter what he does.
Husband never faces any huge consequences for any of his crime but wife is expected to be pure and if she is not then she is a trash. It doesn't matter even if she was kidnapped or forced but still she is the one to be blamed.