Hi, I was wondering why I read elsewhere some other interpretations of the d-statistic. For example, if d>4-dl, we can reject. And if 4-dl>d>4-du we have no decision also. Are these other places wrong or is there something different about these interpretations? Thanks.
Mr Lambert, you are a legend. The past 5 years you made topics which I found hard to understand tangible and fun. Thank you for all your work
BASED GOD BEN LAMBERT
useful.. but the change of mic quality was trippy when you're in exam zombie mode..
We are very thankful for all Videos sir. In the context of Serial autocorrelation how important it is to test for cross section data.
Thank you Ben!
muito bom, very good, très bien!!!
Could somebody tell me how we derive that the Durbin Watson statistic is approximately equal to 2(1-delta1)?
Very importnt mention in minutes 4.95-5.02 >> should make an attempt to highlight this
Absolutely love your videos. Super helpful always
Great stuff, but I cannot for the life of me find the order of the videos. What playlist is this video in?
Thanks, what is the next video?
thank you so much!!
Hi, I was wondering why I read elsewhere some other interpretations of the d-statistic. For example, if d>4-dl, we can reject. And if 4-dl>d>4-du we have no decision also. Are these other places wrong or is there something different about these interpretations? Thanks.
5 years later.... did you ever figure this out? Wondering the same thing
Hey Ben, what device do you use to make these videos (for writing the equations) ? And indeed I am thankful to you for your fantastic videos.
GOD