UVI Falcon | Review | Computer Music Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @kevincourcey813
    @kevincourcey813 6 лет назад

    Great job. Tackled just enough to make it interesting but not overwhelming. Good selection of patches illustrated as well.

  • @stebo5562
    @stebo5562 5 лет назад

    Sound quality of this plugin is amazing. RUclips doesn’t do it justice

  • @issiewizzie
    @issiewizzie 7 лет назад

    there is something about the dynamics of the sound Falcon I'm not getting from omnisphere.... but i'm still scratching my head though..... as to how it compares

  • @diggyonutube
    @diggyonutube 8 лет назад +10

    Fuck it. Rent is gonna be late!

  • @shuteyebeats
    @shuteyebeats 8 лет назад

    Great review homie

  • @EFEFLOW
    @EFEFLOW 8 лет назад

    Nice Video Thanks!

  • @daddydox
    @daddydox 6 лет назад

    Awesome software I would like to see someone use it to make a Trap.. Hip Hop.. or R&b beat it seems the stock sounds are mostly geared towards dance music

  • @esoteric6178
    @esoteric6178 7 лет назад +3

    I sure hope this plug-ins gets better. I bought it when it was first getting hyped. Shouldn't have. It's clumsy, nothing is intuitive. Just to make a simple sound like a bubble lead or piano takes far longer then in another synth. I have had it for some time now and though the factory presets sound OK many of them are sample based and to get the same sounds takes forever on your own. Big Big disappointment. I should have downloaded a demo long before I bought it. Yeah I know it's my fault for not having demoed it first but I did watch a bunch of videos. There are many ways to improve it. For instance adding a template for subtractive synthesis so we don't have to add in every element to perform it one by one by one. Same for the wave table and fm. The closest thing you can do is choose a factory sound and then delete the elements of that sound you don't want but that's really annoying because you have to deal with deleting all the modulation parameters as well and those are a pain to delete. Also, the watetable synthesis is a very far cry from serum and the plug in takes a ton of memory. Very CPU intensive. So far two thumbs down on this plug in.

    • @zoundsic
      @zoundsic 7 лет назад +1

      There's no demo,
      It's a steep learning curve, but worth putting effort in as it pays back eventually, will last a lifetime and quality sounding. You'll know how to use when they release next version too, these things get improved when the concept is a good one to start with.

    • @tekrahmuzik777
      @tekrahmuzik777 6 лет назад +1

      Man i was close to get it but....ill pass for now, thank you for the comment!

    • @dman030
      @dman030 6 лет назад

      im seeing the same, and honestly if you have NI Komplete, im not seeing a big advantage.

    • @GershyJazzy
      @GershyJazzy 6 лет назад +1

      Man, are those serious issues? You can always save your own template-simple-basic patches. I love this instrument. It is a sampler (much better than Kontakt) and a synth that brings together subtractive synthesis, wave table, FM, granular, pluck, organ... All-in-one. Omnisphere... Serum...? Yeah, fine, they are ok for using their presets and composing fast. But Falcon’s versatility to create unique sounds is almost unbeatable (maybe Reaktor, Max, etc... but in these cases we would be talking about almost creating your synths from scratch).

    • @appar1tixn
      @appar1tixn 5 лет назад

      yeah but this guy isn't a newbie on the field actually. before it was know as machfive by MOTU eventhough it was made by uvi as well as good portion of content for it, sadly, the content for machfive isn't provided with falcon and unless you already own machfive you can't have it... this beast has years behind it...@@zoundsic

  • @DCeeMusik
    @DCeeMusik 7 лет назад +1

    Thank GOD tax season is coming up.