Andrew Left DUMBFOUNDED by Women in 1v3 Debate on No-Fault Divorce...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
- Andrew takes on 3 women at once on the topic of no-fault divorce and is left dumbfounded by a dumb question...
►Full Vod on Rumble
Follow The Crucible
►STREAMING PLATFORM - COMFY.STREAM
►DISCORD - / discord
►REDDIT - / thecrucible
►ROCKETCHAT - thecrucible.chat
Support The Crucible
►PATREON - / the_crucible
►PAYPAL - t.co/79gmxAC811
►BECOME A MEMBER - / @the_crucible
#TheCrucible
Andrew: "You're not going through a divorce?"
Angela: "No because I want to stay in America."
Not "I love my husband," or "I care about my marriage," or something similar..."I want to stay in America."
😂 nice catch
I think she was kidding.
Hope he sees that. I doubt she's joking. She would have sounded infinitely better if she said happily married
@@psnfailout000she seems like a real master of rhetoric
You caught that too, huh?
Telling women they cant debate with anecdotes just completely shuts down their brains.
Women do not even realize that thier doing emotional abuse while explaining emotional abuse. Using anecdotes which explain only the what happened instead of the why falls under slander of the man and is ommiting important information which leads to emotional abuse of that man. Goes to show thier lack of logic from the get go.
100% blue screens them
Because they're narcissists. They can't imagine that the world doesn't work the way they think it does.
It has to be ALWAYS about them, and their experiences. They have the need to talk about it thinking that they are important, I am talking about them personally, not the story itself.
@@1flash3571 💯
This entire segment is a perfect example of what women would consider emotional abuse. When women lose an argument, to them that’s emotional abuse
They have not suffered emotion abuse as women clearly. I have and I can tell you exactly what constitutes emotional abuse.
They are master manipulators. Everything falls back to them being the victim. Even the terminology they use requires them to be the victim of something. Imagine a man going to court and saying he wants a divorce because of emotional abuse. Think about how dumb that sounds. How does one define emotional abuse? We watched an entire video and not a single one of them gave a proper example of emotional abuse, yet they all used the phrase.
@@bootsbooy would you like me to give you an example of emotional abuse?
@@NecessaryDramaAddictionNDAcool story but we’ll all pass on that offer.
@@gianni_schicchi so, in other words you could hear what emotional abuse is, and refute it why you don’t think it’s emotional abuse but you won’t because you know that domestic abuse exists and within domestic abuse situations emotional abuse exists and you’d be proven for the utter fool you are
They insist on "emotional abuse" being a valid reason because they know that a man could never use that as an excuse to leave his wife.
Its just a way for women to leave a marriage without looking like a harlot.
100 % right!!
Bingo. Made up excuses for their terrible behavior and choices. Gas light narcissist and toxic are their buzzwords. Screw em at your own risk fellas.
Emotional abuse is their favorite because it's impossible to completely nail down, yet it's so very useful for getting others to achieve your goals.
That is always their first card throw. Yet, the husband financial abuse is normal
Mortgage payments
Home repairs
Buying her gifts
Take out and pay for food, entertainment, vacations, etc.
He is a bank, he is suppose to use all his funds without question... but don't hurt her feelings 🙄
The problem with divorce is that men are punished and women are rewarded regardless of who's at fault
We have this thing called "no fault" divorce in western cultures. This means one could quite literally do NOTHING wrong/bad and the other can still break their vows.
Seeing as irreconcilable differences is the #1 reason for divorce and women file 75-80% of the time...🙄🤔
Women marry men for the benefits they offer. Men marry women because they love them.
who enforces divorce law? men. the problem is men or the enforcers of the system.
@@FazeParticles that's just a dumb thing to say, the men who made those laws did it to protect women in the case of divorce, they didn't forsee a time where men and women were equal earners, amd litteraly the only reason women don't have to be homemakers anymore is because of all the modern conveniences that man have invented, not sure if you're a woman or not but that's not a nice way to show appreciation for the laws and inventions that helped women
@@FazeParticles also the men in charge now would never take away these outrageously one sided laws cuz it'd be carer (word for ending yourself) it's up to women to back these changes in divorce/child custody laws but they only fight for equality when it benefits them, and u can't deny that
The modern western woman it truly ruined.
"Spare the rod, spoil the child."
equal rights for women is spoiling them. that's so clear to see. no exception will sway me otherwise and i used to be egalitarian myself 10 years ago.
@@FazeParticles i think you never had sex you didnt need to pay for...
Equal when it benefits them, but when it doesn’t then they want special treatment for being a woman.
@@mile3018 lmao my man
“Maybe you should have stayed in geometry.” 😂
Yes!! Lol
I still can't wrap my head around why Lauren would have said that.
@@shauncatlett6066because she is dumb
@@shauncatlett6066It’s called reaching for straws. She has to come up with some stupid shit to try and make this make sense.
All them degrees and still oblivious
Andrew doing these panels is like when I go out to my garage and beat the shit out of my 3 different punching bags
That woman in the video owes me money for emotional abuse of her stupidity. This is why the woke say debate is not setup for them. Cause they think laws should be made cause less than 1% of people are affected by something.
lol
it's more like going out to your driveway and dunking on your two year old triplets, using your body weight to send them flying, bodily
What's sad is these women actually think they are so profound and intelligent when they speak, when in reality they look like children to the audience😂😂😂😂 apparently delusion has no limits.
@@duncanidaho5834 It's more like when you go to a middle school football game and play for your son as a 40 year old man and the crowd is cheering for you.
No Fault Divorce, not ONLY renders the reciting of vows as entirely irrelevant, but it actually makes the vows a blatant lie that yields a reward for the liar.
The only way no fault should be used is if both parties agreed to divorce mutually if not there should be a reason and evidence given against the party who is at fault
I LOVE this Psychological "Abuse"
it's the ULTIMATE get out of Jail Card.
They cannot let go of "emotional abuse" because it's their fall back justification for leaving. It's subjective on purpose. They would think being made sad is abuse. If a husband says "no" to something they want to do, that would be considered emotional abuse and a justified reason for leaving. It's childish. Most modern women are nothing more than grown, spoiled, children.
I suppose nagging can be emotional abuse too!
Spot on.
Same reason they like subjective jobs where they can't be judged on objective metrics and why they say very vague things like "hookup" instead of "let the gang spiroast"
@@roscoeshepard Oh, big time and they`re the expert at that one.
When a child knows they can act out without consequences, they become little hellions. It takes the threat and enforcement of consequences to solve that.
These women are the exact reason why they can’t be taken seriously. Zero logic.
@mexicanpribilege7848 No intelligence!!!
What a nightmare, arguing with not 1, not 2 but *3* women at once. Andrew is gonna get some war flash backs due to this.
It doesn’t t matter how many women he debated they’ll argue the same
These full of themselves types will always fall back on the lack of reason and logic and replace it with victim claiming or other excuses instead of accountability for actions. No Arguments that do not revolve around some claim of a story that their friends husband was abusive Physically and Emotionally as an excuse for what ever other argument is going about some rights or the law etc etc etc..all BS
3:00 Emotional abuse is when you disagree with anything she says. 😂😂😂
translation "He won't tolerate my bulls***"
Exactly
This is literally truth you’re speaking SIR!
Who In this world including business and family, wouldn’t cut off your spending if you were taking them towards bankruptcy????
This is the dumbest argument I can think of 😂
Stay single and save yourselves gents
A lot of women might act like that's what it is, but there are actual ways a man can be mentally abusive (or woman, & I've seen multiple relationships where the woman is extremely mentally abusive, I mean, just evil.) No one should be screaming, name calling, intimidating, threatening, etc. their spouse. It's one thing if someone is just an a-hole in arguments sometimes, I'm talking about behavior that, if anyone saw it, they'd be horrified. No one should be saying s*** to their wife, or husband, like, "I'll kill you, you dumb f-ing b--," or something, for example. That is abusive.
How dare you! 😂
These women, with perfect geometrical logic structures, are voters. Let that sink in.
Oh yes, they are… and the state of this country today proves many of them are indeed voting.
Hence why the person in the white house with dementia and a history of corruption got elected because they were gaslit emotionally by the media
Explains a certain political party.
Abolish the 19th.
This is why men need to stand on values and principles. If men will lead woman will follow. Stop sleeping around,stop feeding their egos and start making them grow up through action. If a kid is fat take away his food.
Get rid of the wine girl...not the brightest...damn!
Nah keep her, shes the avg millennial woman from what I have seen. Andrew needs to make an example of her
Honestly single digits all around even the “lawyer” got wrecked so hard…
I love the chick who said she was not getting a divorce because of her green card.
She should be reported and deported for fraud.
Geometry!!! 😂
I fucking DIED !!!!!
Might as well said, "Astrology!"
To put it nicely, Neeina should be quiet more often.
No!!!!! 😂😂😂😂 she is so great
@@notyoureverydayashleyxoxoyes she is so dumb
I think she has tourettes. :)
Most women should follow that
Deprivation of funds literally happened to a friend of mine. His wife is physically and emotionally abusive and an alcoholic. So my friend cut off his wife's access to their bank account so she couldn't impulse buy and get booze. It's saving their marriage but he still needs to deal with her abuse because all the booze did is amplify her abuse.
But he's trying to stay married, right?
I don't have a problem with that, but I think we've made it too easy for a woman to say "I got bored" and walk away with half of everything and all the kids. And ok, maybe eventually your friend gets divorced, but then they should have to prove in court years of emotional abuse, any treatment/therapy, etc... Be able to say "look, I really tried".
My friend is about to marry a wench like this... fooks
@@captainz9 He's trying to stay together for his kids, but she's basically weaponized them against him. She doesn't have separate income from him. He has to invite me over for "dinner" so that his kids stop threatening and yelling at him and his wife is on good behavior but the entire time it's uncomfortable because you can feel the tension in the air. Mind you, these are sub 10 year old children and they're telling him they'll slit his throat in his sleep. It's gotten better, but he's of that mind that striking your kids won't solve problems and they're the kind to have the police on speed dial if he raises his voice.
Personally, if I had a kid say or act the way his does, I'd probably give them good cause to go to the cops with all the beatings they'd receive.
His marriage is in bad shape. But the deprivation of funds is working wonders because she can't just go buy anything anymore and he can take more time off work because he's not paying for her alcohol problem.
Everybody has to start somewhere 😊
@@charleshill1906the one time I told my mom I'd call the cops she told me "Tell them to send the ambulance, too" and I shut my smart mouth. She wasn't abusive although she did spank us - I don't even remember what was going on anymore but it left an impression.
I think it’s ironic how women complain about men being controlling in relationships but the argument is usually framed in a way where the women is upset she can’t do what she wants . Basically they will call a man controlling because the women isn’t in control.
Well put, they call you controlling because they can't control the scenario. Its a shaming tactic for used them to gain control.
@@adiosmiamigo same with selfish. They call you selfish because they believe you should place a greater importance on attending to their wants and interests than you do to yours. Mindblowing isn't it?
@@Aryankingz exactly, their manipulation is getting exposed. They argue without principle, they argue only for their perceived benefit and control, which is why a lot of their premises are logically hypocritical. Now men are starting to flip the script on them since their manipulation is getting exposed
@@Aryankingz yup and the scary part is they don’t even realize it and they actually believe what they are saying is logically sound.
Most, not every. Unicorns exist.
Most women are mentally children, they never HAD to grow up. Stuck mentally in high school or middle school.
Sad really.
He wasn't dumbfounded, he just found dumb.
Bro Neeina hasn't improved at all since her earlier debates. I'm not even being mean, it's just true.
She has a 50 IQ and that is being generous.
Is that the chick who sounds like she’s on heroine slurring her words?
@@TheKonnoisseur11 she talks with a Hasan-esque lisp because she has watched him so much lol
THE FUCKING HENS CLUCKCLUCKIN any time Andrew makes a point lmao!
Andrew has found his calling. We need him out here doing the good work
2 packs of Ramen Noodles for Brains between the 3 of them
Nacho Cheese & Vinegar Flavour
Perfect description of BPF’s opponents lmao
They are literally idiots 😅😂😅
With no seasoning and cold water
With no seasoning and cold water
Andrew killin as usual! 👏🏾
To be fair this was shooting fish in a barrel. ;)
First time watching. I have no idea how you can stand listening to them for so long lol.
He's getting money somehow
You see he had to have a cigarette 🚬. He put it out, then they spoke more, THEN he lit up again 😂
Most women would call “not buying her a dozen roses every day” is emotional abuse.
They would also say that _Buying_ her a dozen roses feels too heavy, so that's an emotional abuse as well.
The ideal number of roses you should buy her daily is a random number between 0 and infinity, and it depends entirely on her emotional state at a given moment - with her refusing to give you any clue about _what_ that emotional state actually is, because "if you really cared about her, you wouldn't need to ask".
"Emotional abuse", is anything that a woman does that she knows she shouldn’t be doing and you tell her not to do it. 😜
She brought up Steven Crowder wife. His wife was a stay at home wife with a full time nanny and was not taking care of the kids or home.
With an out of context clip…just one…and guess who leaked it..from their private camera..that wasn’t hacked
@@mccalltrader she leaked it and edited it crowder has custody of the kids she was a bish at all times to him
A clip where SHE knew she was on camera and he didn’t, allowing her to play it up to make him the bad guy.
Of course this is wholly ignored by the princess class.
Don't forget how much she edited and then deleted footage @@mccalltrader
It’s abuse because he scolded her and only children and men are allowed to be scolded both privately and publicly.
6:59 if he can "cut off her credit card" it's obviously NOT "her" credit card. It's his and HE was ultimately responsible for the end balance owing.
Ding ding ding!
Her account or a joint account would require her input. Too many woman have this "his money, our money" mentality. Ma'am, a bank sees only one legal name on that card and if that legal name has the sole power to decide who has secondary access to it or not, it is his account. "Our" is an illusion in that scenario.
@@MrQuestiel Preach! I just got out of a 6 year relationship. I let her use my Discover credit card, which she ran up a good bit of debt. It only has my name on it, so guess who is responsible to pay it off? Not her.
@brianborstein8456 yup my ex wife put my card 10k in debt and I was left to pay it off too
@UpsidedownC this is what modern feminists do NOT realise when they cry about how women couldn't hold bank accounts in past times.
Yes that's partly true, a single woman COULD in fact have accounts and such. Women still within the family home or married however were not. This was because in those cases it was her FATHER or HUSBAND who was legally responsible for any debt she incurred or crime she committed. So even back then, women were NOT held accountable for their actions. Surprise nothing had changed.
I had to cut my wife’s credit cards off because she was over spending, she couldn’t understand the structure I was implementing because she always struggled with geometry..
hahaha
That's gold. Pure gold
"not emotional abuse"
Lady, that comes from women. 99 times out of a hundred.
Feminism has taught them "the second you're not 110% happy, just walk away". Pretty disgusting and toxic, literally ZERO commitment and accountability!
It’s interesting that these women would not have thought to pull up any articles to see what is considered emotional abuse. Because they didn’t really mention anything consider emotional abuse except gaslighting which they never defined. To be emotionally abusive you have check off multiple boxes on that list just like if you are a narcissist, you aren’t a narcissist is you only check off one of the symptoms.
But Andrew is right. I have almost been married 10 years and couples will be mean to each other and that isn’t an excuse to leave. That’s when you work together and grow
because they dont care.. they love the buzz words and consider that only women go through it..
then you realize that since women, in average, are not as strong as men.. they are the ones that actually do it more often.. like DP said "gossip, innuendo and destruction of reputation". Also, because they know a majority of men aint gonna hit them for that
And narcisism is a clinical diagnosis. Too many women are quick to call men who aren't 100% on board with a woman's plan a narcicist.
@@selderanealso, is there any more narcissistic woman in the entire world than a western woman?
@@9chilidog No, but an actual personality disorder narcissist, she's the devil: absolutely soulless and void of any human traits. They'll do absolutely anything and everything you would never believe anyone could. And they ALWAYS get away with their crimes, because women cannot be THAT bad, Amber Hearding their way to their next victim.
@@9chilidog women are highly narcissistic by nature and they're blind to it
women out here taking L's and not even realizing it wild 😭
Is it me or do these women just seem to be argumentative instead of arguing actual points and wanting a civilized debate. Frivolous examples and feelings over facts seems to be thier main 'weapons'
Yes. And any attempt to hold them to logic, intellectual honesty or accountability is emotional abuse.
Yes. They just want to will their way to being right rather than actually having the right ideas.
@@inquisitor4635 oh, did you not know? Logic is just a system of rules made by men to maintain hegemonic masculinity and enforce patriarchal standards of thought!! Logic is subjective! Booo Phallogocentrism /S
He keeps debating them on many topics. Wasting his time, but many views tell him to keep going
He asked her what the three laws of logic were, then she started trying to do a modus ponens syllogism, but couldn't get past the first premise. Her geometry skills are obviously lacking.
Rational thought, logical thinking, and reality.....Its very unwoman like and directly from the famous philosopher, Aristotle which is why they don't know crap about it. Any college student who thinks they are smart but totally lack any wisdom that they might have picked up if they had studied a little Philosophy.. Hell Any Philosophy is too much for anyone whos projective and background all comes from emotions and many times emotions that they felt from a story told by a friend or other crap. The lack of any belief in the laws of logic much less any knowledge about them is obvious.
"Partner" is not a term that should be used about heterosexual relationships.
"Gaslighting" is a feminist term that should be abandoned.
Thank you tired of hearing that word and even worse when men say that bullshit
Despite popular belief women actually have a hard time accurately remembering what was said in an argument because their emotions are all they care about so when you tell them what was actually said they think you're gaslighting them
Gaslighting and "narcissism" are two words that make it very hard for me to be charitable with people.
"Uggghhhh you think you're right and you're going to act based on your beliefs? How narcissistic!" is basically what they're saying.
"gaslighting" is a term from a movie. The term references the the incidents that happened in a fictional story.
It's not feminist.
The movie didn't invent the term (nor did it appear in the movie). The term is a reference to the title and plot of the movie. But it wasn't a widespread term until about 15 years ago, and it was popularized as a term used to describe the manipulation of women by men, and yes, it this was a product of feminist ideology in the pop psychology world. I was steeped in that world at the time (due to work), so I witnessed it first hand. It has sense been used more widely and has lost much of its meaning, but a decade ago you only really heard it from feminists and liberals to create a special descriptor for male manipulators.@@bobjohnson1633
The total lack of accountability is breathtaking!!!
Modern Women
1% - Accountability
19% - Gaslighting
80 % - Excuses/PlayingtheVictim
Don’t you think that 1percent is a bit generous lol
@@Baka_Baka89well making fractions of a percentage could confuse some people, mainly the ones who would agree with no-fault divorce.
They use emotional abuse cause it’s hard to define and they can gaslight their way through it.
.1% accountability
There I fixed it for you 👍🏾
Andrew: "What are the three laws of logic?"
Lauren: "a2 + b2 = c2"
Andrew:
Sensible people will all likely be against abuse.
With that said, they have redefined "emotional abuse" to mean something as simply not getting your way.
On podcasts, I have seen female guests state that the ex was emotionally abusive because he referenced responsible boundaries that healthy relationships should have.
I really think the green card married female shouldn’t be saying things like “I want me green card so I won’t be getting divorced”. That’s some INS candy right there that they’d love to eat up to void their marriage certificate.
Yeah, she seems to be committing fraud and should be arrested and deported
What amazes me is that I"ve debated majors in Physics and they haven't been able to grasp the correlation that the Laws of Physics map onto the Laws of Logic...so mentioning Contradiction...they can't grasp that it's the same as two things not occupying the same space at the same time. Pointing that out caused the 'smoke from the toaster' effect and they just couldn't pop those slices out to stop a house fire.
gEoMeTrY
5:50 "Fine, if we're going to be pedantic..." ** the girls mentally wondering what that word means 😂
9:00 A lawyer unaware of the laws of logic. Wow! Grifting OF 304s
those women are not competent enough to rationalize this conversation
A master class in female S.I.G.N. Language. There’s two totally different conversations going on.
I love how women tag-team their debating, so one can say something she can't back up, and another will swoop in and distract. They act like they're inferior to men in debates, which leads to them acting insecure and playing but unfair rules, which is why men and women shouldn't really be debating serious topics.
The most painful part of this was:
1 - They kept showing minimal self-control in blurting out crap....
2 - ... and all at the same time.
3 - And seem *completely* unaware that the crap they're saying makes absolutely no sense
4 - And bringing up things that *do not matter* -- like geometry...
5 - ... and then when Andrew brings up a similarly useless thing, suddenly they _DO_ understand that it's useless.
6 - And they foolishly believe that they're making good points.
He asked early on, "what is emotional abuse?", and we _NEVER_ got an answer for this. And this is the fulcrum upon which their argument pivots, so a clear identity of what constitutes 'emotional abuse' is pretty important.
I actually agree that 'emotional abuse' is a thing. However, at this point, the concept is so vague that it's become a useless umbrella term for _ANYTHING_ which a woman doesn't like. In this regard, it very much follows the same social trajectory of the accusation "racism!". It's just so broad that it's lost all meaning. And considering that women don't like things like "accountability" or "responsibility" or even just "logic", then in their minds, accountability, responsibility, and making-damn-sense are _ALL_ indicative of "emotional-abuse".
Plus, how is gross financial misbehavior an acceptable way to express that they are experiencing a problem, and that the husband should react with nothing short of sympathy? _JUST USE YOUR WORDS!_ Stop 'acting-out' as an adult! That's _CHILD_ behavior!
Considering that women speak roughly 2.5 times as many words when compared to men, why can't they say what they really mean??
Because they don’t mean anything. You can’t explain a point that you don’t have or have ever thought of.
Any time somebody says "What if," is their attempt to change the rules to divert the question and then arrive at whatever answer suits them.
2:55 you leave marriage for “gaslighting “? Are you kidding me.
Angela: "I don't see how a guy can be emotionally abusive and then slowly not be emotionally abusive any more."
Me: You married the guy, right? I'm assuming he wasn't emotionally abusive up to that point, right? So you're saying a guy can slowly become emotionally abusive, but can't go back?
That was straight up hoe math there. Either he was always abusive and you married him or it started while you were married. If it started "for no reason" they why can't it stop "for no reason." My brain fried on that one. They act like shit just falls out of the sky and they are just reacting, no accountability for their actions and lack of empathy for their husband.
They clearly cared more about emotional abuse than physical abuse
People should be screened for IQ before being given the chance to debate with Andrew.
When he goes.. "WHAT??" 8:49 😂 What are these chicks even talking about
that chick who said she was married around 5 minutes said she's married for a green card... so she does not have the say value to marriage as you or I, its just a means to an end for her.... reality is, she likely will get divorced as soon as she gets her green card.
I love how they saw a three minute vid of crowders relationship and they got it all figured out
I've looked into it and what I found out was she was rather unbearable and crowder was sick of her shit
Idk how tf I’m just finding out about andrew. But you run an amazing channel. Instant fan
8:28
I understood what he was trying to do was basically show the single digits how an “anecdote” isn’t a valid argument.
Thus he made another anecdote where the woman was pleased the man took care of the finances and she was ok with that.
._. Smooth brains… who gave them right to vote again?
😂
@@goblin6587 Hypotheticals aren’t argument’s my guy. Same as “anecdotes” he was trying to make a point and they couldn’t even comprehend what was being said.
You trying to white knight fails since anecdotes same as “hypotheticals” can’t be proven.
Care to give an example of “financial abuse”? At least entertain me while making a better point than your queens 💅.
@@goblin6587He asked for an argument for Deprivation of funds being emotional abuse. She couldn't whether that's because she isn't bright enough to do so or because she knows that emotional abuse is highly subjective. That's the question.
@@goblin6587 So… we agree they couldn’t even come up with a good argument.
Got it.
@@goblin6587 So just gaslighting? Sure she should stay. That’s not grounds for divorce.
Besides being “gaslight” would mean that she’s is “unaware” of being lied to.
If she knows she’s being “gaslighted” then that’s not gaslighting just a bad liar.
Anything else?
@@goblin6587 really? Haha 😂
Alright.
So she’s schizophrenic? And he’s trying to keep her safe?
So he’s the martyr in this story.
If you’ve ever read the book “I’m not sick I don’t need help” by Xavier Amador.
Trying to control a schizophrenic person it is basically impossible. I’m really you can’t even make them understand how medicine can help them.
So I would say by using this example or anecdotal or hypothetical etc etc it would still be “safer” for the mother to stay married with a guy who’s keeping her safe.
Morally? I would say if it means keeping the wife safe and alive then anything is morally.
It's great that Andrew called them out on their giggling and scoffing, when they were talking about men emotionally abusing people, as if they've never done it, or it hasn't happened to them.
Angela being the biggest culprit.
"Oh, I need geometry for that".
Bravo, good sir. I so enjoy your content & hope your chanell grows leaps and bounds. I am just glad someone follows the structure of a debate without breaking away from it when they try to derail the conversation 👏🏽
They hold on to the "emotional abuse" as an excuse to leave a marriage that they're not interested in building anymore. And they're frustrated that their guy just won't cheat or be physically abusive, so there just had to be a reason to leave.
In my country there is a saying: 'A women with money in a store is like a madman with a machine gun!'... Women in mass generally regulate their spending based on the money they have available... Meaning if a woman has $1000 a month, she lives a $1000 lifestyle and if she has $10 000 a month, she lives a $10 000 lifestyle... Half of the family men I know hide money from their wives and the family lacks for nothing, and out of the other half only maybe 10-15% of their wives aren't just recklessly spending...
Andrew is right
Its very important that if one of the partners were being irresponsible with money, that's it's a duty to cut off funding so that they're no longer irresponsible with money for the financial security of the family.
"Think about the family. Don't think about yourself."
Andrew is also right that often times, especially if you look at consumer spending, women are responsible for upwards of 70% to 80% of all consumer spending; women spend a lot of money.
So when financial disputes come up inside of marriages, it's not usually the man who's overspending.
This is why it generally falls under the duty of a man to say, "No! You can't overspend."
If he's the breadwinner/provider of the family, why would it be problematic for him to say that this money needs to be used in a way I deem responsible for the family.
He can put a stop on the funds while he gets to the root of the problem via communicating with the woman
I know a woman that keeps getting $10,000 worth of credit card debt and then her husband has to pay it off but he doesn’t want to have to pay it off but he has to pay it off because she racked up $10,000 worth of credit card debt. So what these women are saying is if he makes her stop racking up the $10,000 of credit card debt it can be Weaponized into emotional abuse? Couldn’t it be considered emotional abuse to make it so the man has to pay off the $10,000?
Undoubtedly, he cut off her credit card because she would run it up while he was away on business trips. Every guy has been through this....trust me, it's NOT emotional abuse.
They don’t understand how to argue, and then they try to argue using their emotions, which is why all of their arguments tend to have the word emotion in it. Which is ironic because the only emotion they tend to care about, is themselves or people who are like them, or who agree with them.
It does seem to go in one direction doesn't it. Financial abuse is well defined, not having access to his credit is not financial abuse. This also goes with funds, if it's his funds he can deny you access to it. Unless he forces you not to work, deny access to transportation and resources to live on, there is no financial abuse. There is also, after that, Physical and Verbal, there is no Emotional abuse. How does one use their emotions to abuse another? The logic isn't there to be weighed and measured in court. You may have had an emotional response to it but it wasn't his emotions that caused harm.
If the man is the breadwinner, he gets the final say on how the money is allocated. Period. It's not "emotional abuse" for a man to decide that his wife's spending is in excess of what he deems appropriate when he's the one that earned it.
Watching them grab at straws for any kind of footing ona point they know they lost is just hilarious to watch.
long live Andrew
She is bragging about doing well in 9th grade math, as a reason she is too smart for Andrew.
Emotional abuse = having a boundary or telling them no
Women emotionally abuse men all the time and in a no fault or at fault those aren't a factor.
It's more common for a women to emotionally abuse a man. We just don't whine about it
I noticed women will say" oh let me finish my point" ,but then will interrupt someone else when they are trying too get there point across.
Emotional abuse doesn’t exist.
yes it does - its when women use emotion to abuse their men because they don't agree, or are causing drama, or testing them !, its all one sided abuse of men from fee mails
"But don't you think that if she started spending uncontrollably, that this is a red-flag?"
Yes, it _IS_ a red-flag. So? That has nothing to do with needing to stop the outflow of money. That's like saying to me, as an EMT, if I put a tourniquet on a gushing limb wound, "but-don't-you-think-that-is-a-sign-of-something-else?" Yes, normally blood doesn't gush out of a person, and is a strong indication of a grievous injury. So? _I _*_still_*_ need to stop the bleeding before anything else happens._
is a woman saying not tonight I have a headache every night an example of empotional abuse, ladies?
is emsculating your man or nagging him constantly an example of emotional abuse, ladies?
its funny how they describe what Steven Crowder as emotional abuse yet isn't that how wives talk to their husbands constantly. Why isn't he doing his part? why isn't he doing x, why isn't he doing y? why does he have to do something without being told?
That's quite literally what the argument Stephen Crowder had with his wife was about. why is it emotional abuse when the husband expresses dissapointement with his wife not living up to her obligations emotional abuse but a wife telling her husband he isn't living up to his not?
Right if you actually look into context of the clip he was sick of her lazy ass
"The Plural of Anecdote is not Data."
This is truly comical...this is exactly why the government should be very small, because idiots like this CANNOT have the power of the state.
Oh dear lord, you are one hell of a debater. More and more I am just enthralled by you and your debate skills. You are FANTASTIC. Please don't succumb to any illness or problems from smoking - you are so needed in today's society! Thank you so much Andrew. Sorry if that comment offends you or anyone, I am dealing with cancer - brain cancer, unrelated, but I do not want a simple act of smoking to put you through anything *lost an aunt to smoking when I was young - please be cautious,careful. No ill will. Love your content!
Every podcast with the differences of men and women always ends in the same place! Women never come to any understanding and provoke men then resort to some form of disrespect. Then when the man responds these women start with accusations or not have a clue what they just said! It’s a sad time in our world when so many people are trying to point out these irrational conversations and how we process them so differently!
Andrew's logic completely disolves here as he forgot to bring a protractor into this debate.
"Never argue with an idiot,
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
-Mark Twain
2:59 "The Steven Crowder stuff"... only shows his response and NONE of the lead-up she contributed to get to that point. That was cherry-picked footage to easily paint a picture that was convenient to the ends his ex-wife was trying to make meet.
That is it's own form of abuse.
I'm a Crowder fan but the fact that they only have 1 car made me think he pulls alot of BS, I don't think she's innocent but what reason can he have to justify only having 1 vshicle as the biggest conservative RUclipsr
@@rossrobertson674 You kinda just answered your own question in the last part of the last sentence, though. Aren't we supposed to be ecologically conscious now, or not?
Yep, it’s funny how only they never showed how the argument started.
You could tell crowder just wanted to be left alone outside and she goes and starts a fight.
I don’t even like Crowder but I can tell when she’s trying to set up a fight in front of the camera.
@@rossrobertson674So owning one car is abusive?
@@mile3018 nah, F that, he ain't a liberal who believes that garbage
5:42 “I don’t see how a guy can be emotionally abusive then just slowly not be emotionally abusive anymore” her bias causes her to speak as if ONLY men can be emotionally abusive & women never do anything wrong. Jesus Christ LMAOOOO
Most child abuse is the mother . And the leaders in emotional abuse are women .dv as well.
Cutting of funds is financial abuse not emotional abuse by the definition. (That the advocates believe in ) .
Women are byfar the guilty party when it comes to lying to the kids about the dad to turn them against him
@rossrobertson674 oh yes, true.
@@shanenolan5625 I got stories about that my kid started to open up all about what her mom used to tell her.
The first few months of getting back with me she told me how scared she was because of what her mother said.
These are “educated” women 😒
Self-accountability is like kryptonite to these 304s.
These women should not be getting married. They clearly have no intention of committing. They just want to live with their boyfriend.
If there was a breach in a dam, these women would say: ''Before we fix the breach, we should first figure out how the breach was caused.''
He is literally dealing with the mental capacity of children.
This dude's patience for regarded arguments is astounding.
Because he sees them as kids!
I am a recovered drug addict when I was using cocaine. I treated my wife and my then baby horribly. I would stay out all night and then make my wife feel guilty by throwing it in her face. How much I worked.I was the problem and I am very blessed that my wife stayed by my side until I recovered. I agree with Andrew
It will never happen but I think the law should be changed to one strike rule. You can file for divorce once but will never receive another marriage license again. If the relationship is so bad and a woman feels like she has to get out, fine; but then you're done. No more marriage licenses. You are permanently divorced. I think people would be more careful going into marriage and be more thoughtful perhaps once in it.
11:40 - Yes, they spend a lot. Look at who holds the most debt from credit and you'll how large of a margin it is.