thank you for explaining this in a way that is actually comprehensible. I have watched many videos on the quantum information theory and this is probably the best video
Dashawn Hatton A good book on the topic is Quantum Information Theory by Mark Wilde. Very easy to follow. This guy always puts me to sleep, but I'll check this out for a bit.
Apply the classical malus' law for cos² θ. To get 1/8, simply multiply the probability of state 1 and +, which is 1/2 × 1/2 = 1/4. Since they are not mutually orthogonal, therefore the max probability is 1/4 × π/2 = π/8.
So normalized states are linked in "gyroscopic" orthogonal alignment?, because of the e-Pi occurrence of connection as unity, bifurcation, trifurcation etc in the point, axial, circular etc sequence. (And is that "entanglement" in a symmetric sequence?) Because 1-0 is contained in unity of point connection and axial superposition dual quantum probabilities, (logarithmic function "e" state of unitary connection or completeness), in the functional-universal time connection, and that determines the orthogonal rotational/spin-reflection relationship of "internal" direction, (1-0 => infinity of infinite direction phases in superposition), and superconduction, (distributed everywhere, all at one-ce), ..the elemental quantum state.(?) And the meaning of "i" makes sense defined as the containment of 0-1D, the dualistic quantum unit-unity of closed connection probability. (The familiar pattern of ripples emanating from a rock dropped in a pond is driven by a point-impact, axial-oscillation, and radial-axial-oscillation of e-Pi orthogonal combinations in point-line-circle reciprocal-oscillation sequences) "Classical" makes sense as the harmonic alignment of vector-rays/radians of synchronous frequencies, in conducting/connecting interference. Less than "Maximally Entangled", would that be "vortex shedding", or Eddy Currents, 2nd Law of Thermodynamics dispersion? "Obviously", 1st Law of Thermodynamics dispersion is log base e sequences of disorder, eg Navier-Stokes, Boltzmans type mathematical simulations(?) Scattering, or inclusion-exclusion Q-prime sequences in the Quantum Fields Mechanism. (Amplitehedron concept of superimposed spin-scattering matrices? Which is another version of Archimedes discovery of Pi by polygons?) So GPS is a system that "uncovers the same coin", simultaneously, that's what the timing clock does. Because the relative shape/orientation of the system including the locations is always changing with time. Bell's inequality is a recognition that only one position is accurate at any one-simultaneous timing, by reverse process. The observable universe is an example of evolved quantum-logarithmic e-Pi coding?, selected naturally by self-assembling resonance. (?) (Logical, not reasonable, like any computer)
The way they have the slides on the left, the presenter on the bottom right and what it is on the top right is brilliant. It's perfect.
thank you for explaining this in a way that is actually comprehensible. I have watched many videos on the quantum information theory and this is probably the best video
Dashawn Hatton A good book on the topic is Quantum Information Theory by Mark Wilde. Very easy to follow. This guy always puts me to sleep, but I'll check this out for a bit.
Please continue, no one is ready to stop unless you are proving, justifying or verifying a predictable phenomena
RUclips's autoplay is one hell of a thing.
Eight years later has anybody got all heads and all tails yet ?
Could you solve the measurement problem by putting a classical computer inside a quantum computer to model what is going on inside?
How to prove the probability of success that is being discussed at 21:35?
Apply the classical malus' law for cos² θ.
To get 1/8, simply multiply the probability of state 1 and +, which is 1/2 × 1/2 = 1/4. Since they are not mutually orthogonal, therefore the max probability is 1/4 × π/2 = π/8.
Why do some comments have "Reply" buttons and others not?
+Vector Shift It may have to do with that the ones without reply buttons are from before the reply function was implemented
+Vector Shift It may have to do with that the ones without reply buttons are from before the reply feature was implemented
great lecture!
His students should write out the answers to his questions. They don't know why they are studying QIT.
So normalized states are linked in "gyroscopic" orthogonal alignment?, because of the e-Pi occurrence of connection as unity, bifurcation, trifurcation etc in the point, axial, circular etc sequence. (And is that "entanglement" in a symmetric sequence?)
Because 1-0 is contained in unity of point connection and axial superposition dual quantum probabilities, (logarithmic function "e" state of unitary connection or completeness), in the functional-universal time connection, and that determines the orthogonal rotational/spin-reflection relationship of "internal" direction, (1-0 => infinity of infinite direction phases in superposition), and superconduction, (distributed everywhere, all at one-ce), ..the elemental quantum state.(?)
And the meaning of "i" makes sense defined as the containment of 0-1D, the dualistic quantum unit-unity of closed connection probability.
(The familiar pattern of ripples emanating from a rock dropped in a pond is driven by a point-impact, axial-oscillation, and radial-axial-oscillation of e-Pi orthogonal combinations in point-line-circle reciprocal-oscillation sequences)
"Classical" makes sense as the harmonic alignment of vector-rays/radians of synchronous frequencies, in conducting/connecting interference.
Less than "Maximally Entangled", would that be "vortex shedding", or Eddy Currents, 2nd Law of Thermodynamics dispersion? "Obviously", 1st Law of Thermodynamics dispersion is log base e sequences of disorder, eg Navier-Stokes, Boltzmans type mathematical simulations(?) Scattering, or inclusion-exclusion Q-prime sequences in the Quantum Fields Mechanism. (Amplitehedron concept of superimposed spin-scattering matrices? Which is another version of Archimedes discovery of Pi by polygons?)
So GPS is a system that "uncovers the same coin", simultaneously, that's what the timing clock does. Because the relative shape/orientation of the system including the locations is always changing with time. Bell's inequality is a recognition that only one position is accurate at any one-simultaneous timing, by reverse process.
The observable universe is an example of evolved quantum-logarithmic e-Pi coding?, selected naturally by self-assembling resonance. (?) (Logical, not reasonable, like any computer)
David Wilkie
Hey dude pass me some of whatever you're smoking
Wait...if you can't explain it simply you don't understand it...
@@prottoychakraborty1124 I don't always agree with this quote, but in this situation this is very appropriate :P
lmao
The trick is to realize that there is no such thing as "certainty"; there is only relatively true.
He ended the lecture at cliff hanger!
fascinating topic. i love this stuff but he sounded arrogant in his intro. so anyone who isnt a scientist is wasting their life?
You could be an artist or a teacher.
I'm from future, quantum computer is successful.