The thing is, in order for Jesus to be a myth you would be saying that 100s of scholars and reputable people of that time were incompetent and or liars.
Resurrection can't be the best explanation. People lie, people hallucinate and people are mistaken. Those are facts. Uncontestable. Nobody has ever shown to be resurrected. Therefore it cannot possibly be the best explanation since nobody has shown it is even possible. It logically follows that the most likely explanation is that they were mistaken, they lied or they hallucinated. Your logic is flawed.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 So it's easier to believe in a supernatural event like a dead coming back to life rather than something that has happened many times like lies and hallucinations?
@@TitoProphetOfSloths Yes because that is what the evidence points to, and logically miracles can occur if a God exists which evidence also points to in hoards.
There is no evidence for the resurrection at all. Even the four Gospels contradict each other and have differing views on what actually transpired. Not only that, but there is absolutely no evidence for an afterlife. I actually find comfort in death. I don't want to live forever. I think that would be suffering. this life on earth is good enough.
@@elididde3377 The reason I said yours must be high is because of the MASSIVE amount of evidence for the afterlife shown in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
You are wrong. There is no evidence. There's copies of translations of copies of things originally passed down orally. If someone says they have a dragon in their backyard, you don't get to say "hey dragons exist! This guy wrote in a book that he has one!" Because that's not evidence. You mention strict standards. Yeah. Duh. Why wouldn't you have strict standards? If you say you have a dog I don't need strict standards, I'll believe you. If you say you resurrected your dog and you have 4 anonymous contradicting stories that say your dog came back, that still isn't good enough. That's not evidence. There's zero things outside the Bible that mention anything about Jesus at all. You can't even prove he existed, how can someone coming back to life even be an explanation since that's not demonstrated to be even physically an option. Nothing has ever come back like that. There was one story where zombies roamed the world. You'd think a nonreligious or non-Christian would've mentioned that but nope.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 I'm sorry but there is zip. No evidence whatsoever of the resurrection. I already read a book called "Case for the Resurrection" which offers nothing new, not to mention all the religious iconography and the light at the end of the tunnel can be induced via oxygen deprivation. If there existed an ethereal, enigmatic substance within the human body that could influence our physical form in measurable ways, we would have discovered it years ago. However, no such substance has been found to date. The concept of the afterlife serves merely as a placebo, a comforting notion designed to alleviate our fears surrounding our own mortality. That’s its sole purpose.
@@Tony-fq3pp the gospels of Matthew Mark Luke and John are the historical Greco-Roman biographies of Jesus’s life written in the first century. These biographies and same New Testament these are contained in have been used time and time again to discover historical sites and artifacts that confirm places, cultures and events that the New Testament authors talks about. If you have a better theory as to the events reported on the life of Jesus and His resurrection, go ahead and make your claim; but it’s been 2,000 years and the resurrection has not come even close to being debunked. The most reasonable thing to conclude based on the evidence both inside and outside the Bible with Roman and jewish documents from people such as Tacitus and Josephus, is that the disciples really saw Jesus resurrected.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 so a couple of things, first of all historians don’t know who wrote the gospels. They think maybe mark wrote one and the other 2 got plagiarised from that. As for the resurrection of Jesus. There is no evidence for Jesus outside of the bible. Just because a book mentions places and dates does not mean everything else is true. Where are you getting your evidence from that Jesus was resurrected? Lastly, what other historical events from other holy books do you take as true? I don’t suppose you think Mohammad flew to heaven on a winged horse or that he split the moon in two?
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 you also said it’s been 2000 years and the resurrection hasn’t been debunked. It hasn’t even been proven. Hence the reason why there are 3500 gods to about 4000 different religions and denominations. Show your evidence.
@@Tony-fq3pp I literally did in this video. You cannot "prove" anything. Prove youre not dreaming right now. The evidence is presented in this video. I will also refer you to this much lengthier playlist including sources. ruclips.net/p/PL1mr9ZTZb3TUYymBPce08oyuhnHLLkR_B&si=7uDT70AtjMyTMv5B Please watch, and please realize that just because evidence doesnt meet the standard you're looking for, doesnt mean it is not valid evidence.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 you don’t know the evidence I’m looking for. That is a dishonest way to debate. Secondly, you didn’t present evidence, you presented the bible. The bible is the claim not the evidence.
The thing is, in order for Jesus to be a myth you would be saying that 100s of scholars and reputable people of that time were incompetent and or liars.
Thanks Man!
Resurrection can't be the best explanation. People lie, people hallucinate and people are mistaken. Those are facts. Uncontestable. Nobody has ever shown to be resurrected. Therefore it cannot possibly be the best explanation since nobody has shown it is even possible. It logically follows that the most likely explanation is that they were mistaken, they lied or they hallucinated. Your logic is flawed.
The conspiracy theory and the hallucination theory have no where near the plausibility that the resurrection logically holds
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 So it's easier to believe in a supernatural event like a dead coming back to life rather than something that has happened many times like lies and hallucinations?
@@TitoProphetOfSloths Yes because that is what the evidence points to, and logically miracles can occur if a God exists which evidence also points to in hoards.
There is no evidence for the resurrection at all. Even the four Gospels contradict each other and have differing views on what actually transpired. Not only that, but there is absolutely no evidence for an afterlife. I actually find comfort in death. I don't want to live forever. I think that would be suffering. this life on earth is good enough.
@@T800-theRealOne your definition of what evidence is must be strict, and your standard of evidence must be very high.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 as should everyone's. Setting low standards for evidence means getting things wrong, without fail.
@@elididde3377 The reason I said yours must be high is because of the MASSIVE amount of evidence for the afterlife shown in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
You are wrong. There is no evidence. There's copies of translations of copies of things originally passed down orally. If someone says they have a dragon in their backyard, you don't get to say "hey dragons exist! This guy wrote in a book that he has one!" Because that's not evidence. You mention strict standards. Yeah. Duh. Why wouldn't you have strict standards? If you say you have a dog I don't need strict standards, I'll believe you. If you say you resurrected your dog and you have 4 anonymous contradicting stories that say your dog came back, that still isn't good enough. That's not evidence. There's zero things outside the Bible that mention anything about Jesus at all. You can't even prove he existed, how can someone coming back to life even be an explanation since that's not demonstrated to be even physically an option. Nothing has ever come back like that. There was one story where zombies roamed the world. You'd think a nonreligious or non-Christian would've mentioned that but nope.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 I'm sorry but there is zip. No evidence whatsoever of the resurrection. I already read a book called "Case for the Resurrection" which offers nothing new, not to mention all the religious iconography and the light at the end of the tunnel can be induced via oxygen deprivation. If there existed an ethereal, enigmatic substance within the human body that could influence our physical form in measurable ways, we would have discovered it years ago. However, no such substance has been found to date. The concept of the afterlife serves merely as a placebo, a comforting notion designed to alleviate our fears surrounding our own mortality. That’s its sole purpose.
So let me get the right to prove Jesus you are using the bible? 🤦♂️😂
@@Tony-fq3pp the gospels of Matthew Mark Luke and John are the historical Greco-Roman biographies of Jesus’s life written in the first century. These biographies and same New Testament these are contained in have been used time and time again to discover historical sites and artifacts that confirm places, cultures and events that the New Testament authors talks about. If you have a better theory as to the events reported on the life of Jesus and His resurrection, go ahead and make your claim; but it’s been 2,000 years and the resurrection has not come even close to being debunked. The most reasonable thing to conclude based on the evidence both inside and outside the Bible with Roman and jewish documents from people such as Tacitus and Josephus, is that the disciples really saw Jesus resurrected.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 so a couple of things, first of all historians don’t know who wrote the gospels. They think maybe mark wrote one and the other 2 got plagiarised from that. As for the resurrection of Jesus. There is no evidence for Jesus outside of the bible. Just because a book mentions places and dates does not mean everything else is true. Where are you getting your evidence from that Jesus was resurrected? Lastly, what other historical events from other holy books do you take as true? I don’t suppose you think Mohammad flew to heaven on a winged horse or that he split the moon in two?
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 you also said it’s been 2000 years and the resurrection hasn’t been debunked. It hasn’t even been proven. Hence the reason why there are 3500 gods to about 4000 different religions and denominations. Show your evidence.
@@Tony-fq3pp I literally did in this video. You cannot "prove" anything. Prove youre not dreaming right now. The evidence is presented in this video. I will also refer you to this much lengthier playlist including sources.
ruclips.net/p/PL1mr9ZTZb3TUYymBPce08oyuhnHLLkR_B&si=7uDT70AtjMyTMv5B
Please watch, and please realize that just because evidence doesnt meet the standard you're looking for, doesnt mean it is not valid evidence.
@@anewwaywithnoah1132 you don’t know the evidence I’m looking for. That is a dishonest way to debate. Secondly, you didn’t present evidence, you presented the bible. The bible is the claim not the evidence.