Wolfram Physics Project: Working Session Thursday, Apr. 23, 2020 [Spin & Charge | Part 3]

Stephen Wolfram & Jonathan continue answering questions about the new Wolfram Physics Project, this time for a continuation of the first live working session, we'll be continuing our discussion on spin and charge. Begins at 3:10
Originally livestreamed at: / stephen_wolfram
Stay up-to-date on this project by visiting our website: wolfr.am/physics
Check out the announcement post: wolfr.am/physics-intro
Find the tools to build a universe: wolfr.am/physics-tools
Find the technical documents: wolfr.am/physics-documents
Follow us on our official social media channels:
Twitter: / wolframresearch
Facebook: / wolframresearch
Instagram: / wolframresearch
LinkedIn: / wolfram-research
Stephen Wolfram's Twitter: / stephen_wolfram
Contribute to the official Wolfram Community: community.wolfram.com
Stay up-to-date on the latest interest at Wolfram Research through our blog: blog.wolfram.com/
Follow Stephen Wolfram's life, interests, and what makes him tick on his blog: writings.stephenwolfram.com

[@WolframResearch]

Find the notebook for this session here: www.wolframcloud.com/obj/wolframphysics/WorkingMaterial/2020/Spin-02.nb

[@michelgent7419]

Wow this is amazing!! The abstraction of momentum (linear and angular) in a space which is composed of connected dots which are constantly changing

[@helmetboyHD]

Nah bruh I fell asleep and woke up to this bro 😭😭

[@alimkashani5586]

SAME!

[@IngolfDahl]

Would a rule {a->b, b->c} -> {b->c, c->a} cause angular momentum? Such a rule will be repeated time after time, just rotating around a, b, c.

[@OlleMattsson]

My hard copy of "A new Kind of Science" finally arrived in the mailbox. Thinking about standing in some random corner in downtown Helsinki shouting random passages from it. That ought to catch somebody's attention to the importance of some of this stuff!
Thank you for all your hard work and inspiring dedication!

[@andrewkelley7062]

I have found thinking of continuous systems in harmonics is sometimes helpful. I know recent conspiracies have tainted the concept but it is a helpful concept, and it leads to helpful understandable representations.

[@nolan412]

"Computer. Computer?" Not quite at Star Trek.

[@nolan412]

Almost the octonion triangle.

[@nolan412]

Granted it should not match exactly with edges going out.

[@nolan412]

Having a 3d,1t superspace like Thad Roberts' model makes spin, the "not angular momentum" spin, easy to understand: the spin that does not have [constant] spatial effects.

[@nolan412]

More given than a graph and repeating operator on it.

[@nolan412]

Or is it Dirac's model?