How could you possibly know that???? We're still trying to figure out the answers to these big questions.but I guess we should stop because apparently you have these answers. Sorry but if you claim to know these answers, you are liar or delusional . Only one of those two things ! Again sorry , but that's a fact.
You have to update this presentation with the latest in DNA technology and findings. I'll try to look for the link but one can google to verify -- at around 70,000 BCE there is a migration out of Africa event of around 250-1000 humans and geneticists say that all human beings can trace their ancestry back to these group of people. They crossed the Red Sea into Saudi Arabia and through the coast, moved to Iran, then India, etc. RUclips channel Expedition Bible makes a very compelling argument that the Garden of Eden is suppose to be at the southern tip of Iraq (where the 4 rivers converge). If this was a fertile land, then surely this group of 250-1000 people may have stayed here (and further migration occurred with this as base). This is congruent to the fact that the first human cities started here as well.
The presentation was not made with atheists as a target audience. Nor was it made for Bible creationists. It was made specifically for those who believe in the truth of both science and the Bible and are trying to find how things went historically with those beliefs. With that said, I too have a problem with his use of "the image of God." But the video is just part of a larger whole (this was obviously cut at the start) and may mean that he defined the usage earlier.
Gen 1:2 occurs BEFORE Gen 1:1 !!! This has been proven grammatically by scholars. The gap could be between 1:2 and 1:3. However, you must mean that there is a gap between 2:3 and 2:4, because no humans had been created before the sixth day.
None of these can be the humans created on the sixth day, because those created on that day had dominion over the elements and so did not live in caves. These humans must have been anatomically modern humans of the homo sapiens type because they were called ADAM, as we are. So, they were created about 200000 years ago. Then, part of humanity was modified and bred about 15000 years ago, as per Gen 2, in order to select human traits, since the interbreeding mentioned in Gen 6:12 is what caused the LORD in Gen 6:7 to destroy humanity with a flood, as he says in 6:12 that all flesh had been corrupted, except Noah, who was in the line of Adam. By the way, God is not mentioned at all in Chapter 6 of Genesis; so, it is definitely not God who sent the flood. God does not send floods; God is resting and had ceased working since the seventh day of creation, which has no end. You must study Genesis for what it says, if you are going to comment on it in any scientific way.
In the beginning, man created God. It's that simple.
How could you possibly know that???? We're still trying to figure out the answers to these big questions.but I guess we should stop because apparently you have these answers. Sorry but if you claim to know these answers, you are liar or delusional . Only one of those two things ! Again sorry , but that's a fact.
@@jerrybauer1767 how do humans know that they have been created by God, and even picture and describe this, if God himself told them?
@@veekap9774 your phrasing of this question does not make sense. Please ask again .
Liked and subbed
Only 2 animals hunt by chase down take over in packs and that's human and dog.
This bloke knows nothing!
The tools are almost irrelevant!
You have to update this presentation with the latest in DNA technology and findings. I'll try to look for the link but one can google to verify -- at around 70,000 BCE there is a migration out of Africa event of around 250-1000 humans and geneticists say that all human beings can trace their ancestry back to these group of people. They crossed the Red Sea into Saudi Arabia and through the coast, moved to Iran, then India, etc. RUclips channel Expedition Bible makes a very compelling argument that the Garden of Eden is suppose to be at the southern tip of Iraq (where the 4 rivers converge). If this was a fertile land, then surely this group of 250-1000 people may have stayed here (and further migration occurred with this as base). This is congruent to the fact that the first human cities started here as well.
Thanks for this. Send the link if you find it.
There was no garden of eden and no Adam.
what a load of bollocks. What, if there even is such a being,, does "God" look like? If you can't answer that, where is your afermatiion?
The presentation was not made with atheists as a target audience. Nor was it made for Bible creationists. It was made specifically for those who believe in the truth of both science and the Bible and are trying to find how things went historically with those beliefs. With that said, I too have a problem with his use of "the image of God." But the video is just part of a larger whole (this was obviously cut at the start) and may mean that he defined the usage earlier.
Gen 1:2 occurs BEFORE Gen 1:1 !!! This has been proven grammatically by scholars. The gap could be between 1:2 and 1:3. However, you must mean that there is a gap between 2:3 and 2:4, because no humans had been created before the sixth day.
None of these can be the humans created on the sixth day, because those created on that day had dominion over the elements and so did not live in caves. These humans must have been anatomically modern humans of the homo sapiens type because they were called ADAM, as we are. So, they were created about 200000 years ago. Then, part of humanity was modified and bred about 15000 years ago, as per Gen 2, in order to select human traits, since the interbreeding mentioned in Gen 6:12 is what caused the LORD in Gen 6:7 to destroy humanity with a flood, as he says in 6:12 that all flesh had been corrupted, except Noah, who was in the line of Adam. By the way, God is not mentioned at all in Chapter 6 of Genesis; so, it is definitely not God who sent the flood. God does not send floods; God is resting and had ceased working since the seventh day of creation, which has no end. You must study Genesis for what it says, if you are going to comment on it in any scientific way.
Adam was the creation of ancient less educated savage people who had no clue.
@vacaloca5575! Facts! You Are Absolutely, And Unequivocally 100% correct. When You Know, Then You Know.