The Myth of Imperial Navy Technological Superiority

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 дек 2024

Комментарии • 828

  • @frankg2790
    @frankg2790 10 месяцев назад +791

    The thing about the Empire is that they were fighting a Rebellion that was mostly usin' antiques. The LAAT, the Y-Wing, the ARC-170, the H-60, and the Z-95 Headhunter, while versatile, were obsolete. It wasn't until they got their hands on the X-Wing, the A-Wing, and the B-Wing that the Rebellion was able to do any serious damage. The TIE Fighter, on the other hand, was the Zero of the Star Wars universe: it could outperform most fighters at the time it was introduced but lost its edge as better fighters ended up being mass produced. The Star Destroyer, while a step back, was the result of doctrinal change: the Empire expected its navy to be able to end wars with a quick show of force.

    • @Emperorvalse
      @Emperorvalse 10 месяцев назад +81

      I completely agree with you.
      I also think the ISD was made for suppression of local systems through intimidation and was designed for planetary bombardment with its turbo lasers and TIE bombers followed up with its organic troop component.

    • @sinisterisrandom8537
      @sinisterisrandom8537 10 месяцев назад +55

      @@Emperorvalse The ISDs were Antiques of their own. They were built at the end of the Clone Wars to deal with numerous amounts of CIS ships. Since 1 Venator could not take down 2 Munificent class dreadnoughts without sustaining a questionable degree of damage.

    • @davonte962
      @davonte962 10 месяцев назад +4

      America that’s the show yhr force

    • @barbiquearea
      @barbiquearea 10 месяцев назад +39

      And this was why Thrawn advocated for the Empire to field more advanced TIE Fighters, like the TIE Defender, which could, in the hands of a capable pilot, deal with X-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings and whatever else the Rebels had in their arsenal.

    • @arseneken
      @arseneken 10 месяцев назад +23

      I love the comparison of the tie fighter to the zero, both were infamous for turning into a ball of fire when hit

  • @zogar8526
    @zogar8526 10 месяцев назад +1310

    People think "military grade" means the best you can get. It doesn't. It means the cheapest you can get with it still functioning, sometimes. Maybe. Now and again.

    • @arcturionblade1077
      @arcturionblade1077 10 месяцев назад +83

      Lowest bid contractor.

    • @animeman8203
      @animeman8203 10 месяцев назад +147

      Depends on the Military actually. I think we can all agree that US Military Grade is far superior to Russian Military Grade.

    • @robertnelson4460
      @robertnelson4460 10 месяцев назад +48

      It means that it meets the requirements of the contract it was procured under.

    • @rapatacush3
      @rapatacush3 10 месяцев назад +39

      ​@@animeman8203the m16 was iniatilly a failure. 80 years old aks works like dream. You can tell them reds all you want but they sure know how to make them weapons.

    • @zogar8526
      @zogar8526 10 месяцев назад +13

      @robertnelson4460 not even that in most cases. It normally falls short in at least one, often more ways, and is still used because it is what is there. I will admit there are certain things that aren't skipped on to the same extent, largely with air power and naval boats. But most things are the cheapest they can get, while still allowing it to work. It is not a standard of quality. It really can't be, not if you have a military of any significant size anyway.

  • @tenn_ore
    @tenn_ore 10 месяцев назад +348

    Perhaps the reason the Empire didn't advocate for planetary defense forces was because they feared that they could be utilized as separate unique planetary militias fighting with a home field advantage in what could end up being hundreds of tiny wars against the Imperials.

    • @jurajsintaj6644
      @jurajsintaj6644 10 месяцев назад +14

      Yep, pretty much.

    • @dpsamu2000
      @dpsamu2000 10 месяцев назад +21

      They'd do what other tyrants do. Restrict ammo for frontier forces giving only enough to resist an attack long enough for central forces to reinforce. But not enough for a rebellion to resist central forces.
      When frontiers in rebellion can resupply without imperial support they can rebel successfully. That's what happened to Rome. But its wealth originated in the frontier. So when the frontier resisted payment Rome fell.

    • @paigeireland3731
      @paigeireland3731 10 месяцев назад

      most likely munitions would have been produced in the outer rim @@dpsamu2000

    • @lemons1559
      @lemons1559 10 месяцев назад +10

      ​@@dpsamu2000"Sorry Sir, we've spent lots of ammo in training and rehearsals, please give us more. We're not stockpiling. Pinky promise :)"

    • @Alpostpone
      @Alpostpone 9 месяцев назад +6

      For an empire, the most valuable currency is control. A uniform force that can be shuffled around at will, answers directly and solely to central authority and has no sympathies to local populace is vastly preferable to a more cost efficient local defense force made up of local populace, from emperor's perspective.

  • @Reoh0z
    @Reoh0z 10 месяцев назад +188

    The empire out there specialising planets like a Stellaris player.

    • @deathtrooper7760
      @deathtrooper7760 10 месяцев назад +15

      not just planets whole sectors. i at least hope i am not the only one reforming sectors, reassigning planets and mass assigning governers for the respective roles the sector/plantes have to serve

    • @Michi-vg2kk
      @Michi-vg2kk 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@deathtrooper7760How do you do that? I thought sectors are now automatically generated around the sector capital.

    • @deathtrooper7760
      @deathtrooper7760 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@Michi-vg2kk you can manually adjust them, adding and removing systems. you should be able to do that from the sctor capital planet interface. they reintroduced this option with astral planes or some time around it. it came at the same time as the option to instal planetary goveners ontop of the sector ones. I used it primarly to min max the mineral and alloy output from former machine worlds i conqured.

    • @Alpostpone
      @Alpostpone 9 месяцев назад +2

      Stellaris rewards specialization because planet-to-planet transport is essentially free and each planet can easily produce just one thing, importing all the rest. In SW it can be inferred that inter-sector transit is likewise very cheap.

  • @luisemoralesfalcon4716
    @luisemoralesfalcon4716 10 месяцев назад +222

    The Imperial Navy was geared for big targets but, they forgot the painful lessons of the GAR: don't ignore a well directed fighter squadron or two.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +5

      That isn't what the Clone Wars taught, though.

    • @Historyandlegends789
      @Historyandlegends789 10 месяцев назад +11

      I’ll disagree with you VERY slightly. It’s geared towards appearing a big target that’s too big to assault but the second you figure out how to take one down they’re finished

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@Historyandlegends789 This isn't even vaguely accurate, though.

    • @luisemoralesfalcon4716
      @luisemoralesfalcon4716 10 месяцев назад +6

      @@Historyandlegends789 that is another thing, they wanted to project fear but left openings.

    • @sethb3090
      @sethb3090 10 месяцев назад +15

      The _Imperial_-class was built to win the fleet combats of the Clone Wars, and we have every indication they would have done exactly that. Anything short of the _Providence_-class dreadnoughts would have been immediately run over, and even they couldn't go toe to toe with an ISD. The thing is, ISDs weren't fighting the Clone Wars, and nothing was trying to go toe to toe with them.

  • @berserkerrex4411
    @berserkerrex4411 10 месяцев назад +182

    Sorry Alan but I feel the need to correct you on a point. The Chinese Navy has not surpassed the US Navy in terms of total ship tonnage, but rather in terms of numbers. In 2022 China’s Navy is recorded at 2,400,000 tonnes vs the US Navy at 4,635,628 tonnes. The important thing to take away is that the US isn’t counting every canoe and kayak as a naval vessel to artificially inflate its numbers compared to the well established US fleets.

    • @matthewconnors8503
      @matthewconnors8503 10 месяцев назад +26

      I'm glad someone else caught this👍

    • @AKUJIVALDO
      @AKUJIVALDO 10 месяцев назад +13

      And China keep these ships in the range of their anti-surface/anti-air umbrella. While US ships are scattered by handfuls.

    • @Anon33467
      @Anon33467 10 месяцев назад +29

      Came to say this. The tonnage gap is enormous.

    • @AKUJIVALDO
      @AKUJIVALDO 10 месяцев назад +9

      @@Anon33467 yes. But also those China's small ships are anti-ship missiles armed ones who doesn't need waste tonnage for fuel, accommodation and food/spares stores, unlike US's.
      Yeah, USA has super carriers...and China has military aerodromes, and anti-missile batteries, and anti-ship/surface missiles batteries, anti-air missile batteries, coverage of radars, and etc., and etc., while on the land in their homeland.
      Their Navies are built for different tasks. US's is for projection of force, China's for annihilation of hostiles near China.

    • @Anon33467
      @Anon33467 10 месяцев назад +22

      @@AKUJIVALDO that is irrelevant to my post

  • @stcredzero
    @stcredzero 10 месяцев назад +387

    Palpatine talking to the designers of the Imperial Star Destroyer: "No, it must be POINTY!"

    • @DoremiFasolatido1979
      @DoremiFasolatido1979 10 месяцев назад +30

      That's actually almost the only thing they got right. The ideal shape of any large space combat vessel should be a tetrahedron of some sort.

    • @stcredzero
      @stcredzero 10 месяцев назад +12

      @@DoremiFasolatido1979 It's not a tetrahedron. It's a squished pyramid.

    • @DoremiFasolatido1979
      @DoremiFasolatido1979 10 месяцев назад +13

      @stcredzero I said "almost". They got closer than anything else has.

    • @stcredzero
      @stcredzero 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@DoremiFasolatido1979 Okay, I'll grant close. Actually, it could also be seen as 2 tetrahedrons.

    • @TheRezro
      @TheRezro 10 месяцев назад +14

      @@stcredzero One of few actual flaws of ISD was the hangar. It is because original Tector class was designed as Battlecruiseer (in navy sense). Designed to fight with enemy capital ships in skirmishes. With fighter escort provided by smaller Gladiator class, what was not meant to participate in direct combat.
      Problem was that Clone Wars ended, before they enter service. With only smaller Victory (what was direct fallow up to Acclimator Assault Ship) participating in Battle over Coruscant (they swept CIS navy almost exactly after scene in movie and cartoon end).
      Anyway. That meant that Tactor was not needed anymore. But empire need something more multi-purpose what could do more colonial supervision duty. Because design was almost finished and capable. They scrap Gladiator entirely (beside few ships what were already build) and relocated hangar to hull of Tector also giving it Assault Ship role (and a massive structural venerability).
      As such weird hybrid was created, what in theory could do everything, but neither could do particularly well or for rational cost. Though it was a decent ship if used in close to intended role. It is why Thrawn was still using them. Empire was basically like five year old who send Battleship after random pirates.

  • @David-l6c3w
    @David-l6c3w 10 месяцев назад +238

    Let's not forget that Thrawn recognized the deficiency in the Imperial Navy assets and pushed his TIE Defender program, which had shields, hyperdrive, and heavy weaponary unlike the typical TIE fighter. Unfortunately for the empire, Palpatine put all his eggs in one basket the Death Star.

    • @TheRezro
      @TheRezro 10 месяцев назад +20

      Vader did the same and arguably have more success (while Defender was amazing, it was prohibitively expansive). Problem was that Emperor has its pet Death Star program, what siphoned all money.

    • @zephyr8072
      @zephyr8072 10 месяцев назад +6

      LOL TIE FIGHTAR AM NO SHELDS.
      How much did shields matter in A New Hope again? Go on, I'm waiting.

    • @Crystal_Moon248
      @Crystal_Moon248 10 месяцев назад +26

      ​@zephyr8072 If the TIE fighters that chased Luke had sheilds, they would be able to take the shots from The Millennium Falcon and maybe kill Luke, preventing the Death Star from exploding.

    • @TheRezro
      @TheRezro 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@zephyr8072 It depend. A-Wing pilots commonly remove shields to get better performance. But basic TIE was straight obsolete, being overrun by a bombers! Generally they were equivalents of Z-95 and slightly better then V-Wing.
      Using Squadrons (game) as example. A-Wing and Interceptor pairing is accurate. A-Wing has token shield and was faster. When Interceptor has better weapons and was more agile. BUT!
      Actual equivalent of X-Wing during that period was TIE/AG Aggressor. What was way more capable TIE variant, with missiles (LN has none!) and turret. While it didn't have a shield, turret could easily compensate this flaw. They use LN in game only for nostalgia reason, as it simply could not compete with X-wing.
      Tie Bomber was straight obsolete! It was designed only for ground attack and it could not effectively attack target in space. Its use in the game is for the nostalgia reasons (at least Y-Wing was still useful, especially with after market modifications). What Should be in the game is TIE/CA Punisher (Interdictor in Legends) What have massively upgunned weapon platform. What could in fact deliver massive punishment to anything in space and in fact did have potent shield!
      I remind that both are in new canon and were used in that period!

    • @TheRezro
      @TheRezro 10 месяцев назад +8

      @@Crystal_Moon248 As side note. TIE/LN variants from Vader Fist, were actually heavily upgraded. They in fact did have shields and hyper-drives, as they were part of Advance Program. Though of course they were not as good as later dedicated variants. Kylo use one of those fighters. So it was not a plot hole.

  • @berniethekiwidragon4382
    @berniethekiwidragon4382 10 месяцев назад +36

    Considering the TIE fighter was developed in the early years of the Empire, it is almost as antiquated as the newest Clone Wars starfighters.

  • @eren34558
    @eren34558 10 месяцев назад +238

    I learn more about economics and politics from Generation Tech than I do from my actual college

    • @TheGoddamnBacon
      @TheGoddamnBacon 10 месяцев назад +3

      Count yourself fortunate.

    • @eren34558
      @eren34558 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@TheGoddamnBacon how bad?

    • @SizzleCorndog
      @SizzleCorndog 10 месяцев назад +11

      Depends on what you’re doing in college and what your media diet consists of but there’s plenty of people on RUclips who approach things in the world from a material analysis/ political pov

    • @Alte.Kameraden
      @Alte.Kameraden 10 месяцев назад +3

      Should watch TIKhistory, or the Foundation for Economic Education "FEE." TIKhistory's critics often mock him by saying "Stick to Tanks" he replies by "Stick to Banks." Because economics is often the driving force for national decisions like wars etc.

    • @SpiceofLifevariety
      @SpiceofLifevariety 10 месяцев назад +2

      Allen loves this stuff. A true nerd

  • @Egalitare
    @Egalitare 10 месяцев назад +13

    My father and uncle were first generation Nuclear Navy employees at Newport News Shipbuilding. Rickover hand picked at least many of employees at both NN and Groton, CT for initial construction duties, down to the welders, fitters, molders, etc. Several cousins and myself were 2nd Gen. 4th Gen of my family are now employees. Its exacting work and one underrated aspect is the high degree of quality control Rickover insisted upon, from reactor containment structures to the enlisted personnel heads. My father grumbled about Rickover’s hyper attention to detail, but he was overseeing the creation of not just new vessels but a culture of high expectations.

  • @mmcollins3
    @mmcollins3 10 месяцев назад +52

    I've toured and and have done business at NPN Ship Yard. Even got the "blindfolded" escort to a top secret area once. At the time the Gerald R. Ford was being manufactured and parts of it were moving into the drydock. Crazy impressive.

    • @IJNAzooma
      @IJNAzooma 9 месяцев назад +2

      Inb4 china tries to get in contact with you after seeing this comment, opsec finna go crazy

    • @DS-lk3tx
      @DS-lk3tx 2 месяца назад

      😂😂😂

  • @KennyBott
    @KennyBott 10 месяцев назад +23

    12:22 Um actually, icebreakers use nuclear because it means that they don’t have to have marine diesel shipped to them for resupplies. They can use other means of getting water (distilleries) and get food shipped via helicopter.

    • @Lieutenant_Matrix
      @Lieutenant_Matrix 8 месяцев назад

      🤓

    • @simonnachreiner8380
      @simonnachreiner8380 3 месяца назад +1

      It's the same reason nuclear subs exist. Subsisting off their reactor provides them an unlimited supply of air and fresh water. The only time a nuclear sub surfaces is at the end of deployment which is scheduled when the food runs out. The only time a nuclear sub would even have to break near total stealth would be to flush the waste tanks when the crew can't take it anymore.

  • @nathanieljackson5554
    @nathanieljackson5554 10 месяцев назад +56

    The Empire would have been a force to be reckoned with if it hadn't been ruled by the Sith. A lot of the dysfunction was due to so many unqualified but loyal members in very important positions.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +3

      The Empire was already the largest and most powerful military force in the history of the galaxy, lul.

    • @karltimmer3261
      @karltimmer3261 10 месяцев назад +9

      @@papapalps2415lasted 20 years comparing to the other empires he is right if palpatine wasn’t hell bent on people fearing him it woulda been greater

    • @karltimmer3261
      @karltimmer3261 10 месяцев назад

      @@papapalps2415and I doubt it was Valkorion Empire was far more powerful if only he didn’t decide on fighting both sith n Jedi

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +6

      @@karltimmer3261 The Empire lasted 'only' 20 years because Palpatine was killed at the eleventh hour in a last second betrayal by his right hand man/the literal Chosen One in a moment prophesied about for millenia, and was likely THE single most significant event in galactic history as a whole. Trying to dismiss all the context behind it is cute, but it isn't going to work.
      As for the Eternal Empire; you are, factually, wrong. The number of statements declaring the Galactic Empire was the largest and most powerful military force are likely somewhere in the double digits. If you wish to prove otherwise, then you will be doing so.

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 10 месяцев назад +1

      Hubris destroys.

  • @arcturionblade1077
    @arcturionblade1077 10 месяцев назад +77

    Tofu dregs buildings, tofu dregs star destroyers.

    • @ashipthattriestobotheryou4759
      @ashipthattriestobotheryou4759 10 месяцев назад +4

      Did you mean Luke could just sneezed and destroyed the Galactic empire?

    • @Alpostpone
      @Alpostpone 9 месяцев назад

      @@ashipthattriestobotheryou4759 Typically you wouldn't expect a couple of fighter proton torpedoes to completely obliterate a small moon, yet here we are.

  • @jordanmay3287
    @jordanmay3287 10 месяцев назад +13

    One small correction. The Gerald R. Ford has 2 nuclear reactors working in tandem

  • @DUNESPICER
    @DUNESPICER 10 месяцев назад +98

    Hello there Generation tech, I just want you to know your one of my favorite long time Star Wars RUclips channels and I appreciate all the things you do

    • @JDredwind
      @JDredwind 10 месяцев назад +1

      I second this ❤

    • @ebiven1563
      @ebiven1563 9 месяцев назад +1

      General Kenobi

  • @whatshaploing8256
    @whatshaploing8256 10 месяцев назад +8

    I love the thumbnail photo. The cutaway pics never convey just how big or how many decks a ship that large would have filled with personnel and various spaces.

  • @Loneguy22
    @Loneguy22 10 месяцев назад +20

    I wouldn't necessarily call the arming of civilian ships to be a new strategy. European nations used to press merchant vessels into their navies during times of war up until the 18th-19th century.
    Personally I can't imagine that that strategy would work well in this day and age. The sailors might have training on the weapons but they won't necessarily have military training and discipline. So during a real engagement they might be more hindrance than help.

    • @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t
      @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t 10 месяцев назад +6

      Actually, that was still done in WW1 and WW2, to provide convoy excorts.

    • @NeSeeger
      @NeSeeger 10 месяцев назад +4

      Armed merchant vessels have been a thing since wind powered navy

    • @kacperszatko8192
      @kacperszatko8192 10 месяцев назад +1

      Nobody said that the reclaimed ships need to be manned by their original crews. It's a better idea to fill them with navy seamen

  • @caldos1213
    @caldos1213 10 месяцев назад +19

    This is the only channel I watch every video ( since COVID) as they come out. You're awesome and both my wife and I love the lore, humor and perspective you put in your videos. Thank you Alan, please keep them coming!

  • @merlinlearned6796
    @merlinlearned6796 9 месяцев назад +9

    The Chinese navy absolutely doesn’t have more tonnage than the USN. They have more hulls, but there’s no amount of crab boats that is worth a carrier

  • @loring638
    @loring638 10 месяцев назад +41

    I love your content and nuanced approach to all these deep, socio-political issues. I never fail to learn something or see a new point of view when I watch your videos. Thanks for being you 🙂🙂🙂

  • @Aasmodeuss
    @Aasmodeuss 10 месяцев назад +7

    As someone who's worked on vessels that were built in a Chinese shipyard I pity any crew who finds themselves fighting a war in one.

  • @aurorajones8481
    @aurorajones8481 10 месяцев назад +48

    Palpatine is a sith. They dont do well in a position of leadership. They do well in taking leadership, but once they get it they always fail at keeping it. Its ironic...

    • @AKUJIVALDO
      @AKUJIVALDO 10 месяцев назад +8

      And that is because writers write that way. After all, you can't make more books or movies when the literal super-human takes power in the biggest and most powerful star state in reality. Nothing can stop him/her anymore...unless some BS excuses are involved.

    • @janmos5178
      @janmos5178 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@AKUJIVALDO Yes, but even in this vision a sense of excessive supposed omnipotence is losing them. They become overconfident.

    • @AKUJIVALDO
      @AKUJIVALDO 10 месяцев назад +3

      @@janmos5178 except only overconfidence of Palps was for some "unknown" reason(AKA author's BS) believing that Vader will always do his bidding, going so far as to kill his son...after going off the rails to protect Padme...his son's mother. Yeah...
      So in the end it is always author's BS.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 9 месяцев назад +6

      @@AKUJIVALDO The idea that Palpatine had 'no reason' to be arrogant in regards to the control he had over Vader, despite the fact that Vader was an obedient dog that obeyed his every whim, knowingly or unknowingly, for literally almost his entire life, and has been specifically cultivated and conditioned by him for most of said life to be said loyal attack dog, to the point Vader willingly betrayed all of his morals and principles to save his life, is hysterically funny. Palpatine made one, singular mistake in the entire franchise, and it was trusting he had enough control over Vader to keep him in line for the few seconds it would take to fry the boy. Big whoop.

  • @davidponseigo8811
    @davidponseigo8811 10 месяцев назад +6

    I'm pretty sure that is not the reason why icebreakers have nuclear reactors, it's for the power to break through the ice and the power to run the ship even if they are stuck in the ice. Legally if a company overloads it's ships reactor on purpose they would be in a huge amount of trouble. My father was part of the Defense Atomic Support Agency which later became the Department of Energy and started as the Manhattan Project and I can guarantee you that.

  • @MagicalMaster
    @MagicalMaster 10 месяцев назад +43

    The issue with the Outer Rim was one that could be solved with a tax break. Basically give a small tax break to all citizens who have children and they can get this break over and over again with each child. You will see a population EXPLOSION in the Outer Rim and with the now big and heavy population you can recruit a defense force, build industry and more.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +8

      This a literal child's solution to economic, infrastructural and societal issues. Like, I geniunely think this is an idea I recall being floated by teenagers back in high school during group projects. Although amusingly, it also seems to be a policy of many third world countries in RL. Which shows what I am saying wonderfully, lmfao.

    • @MagicalMaster
      @MagicalMaster 10 месяцев назад +8

      @@papapalps2415 Fair enough those are not my fields of expertise.
      Now do you actually have any suggestions or possible answers to the massive issue of a low population across a massive area that makes the building of infrastructure and the defense of said infrastructure nearly impossible due to it having not nearly enough people?
      If you're here to throw shit, well bullseye, I know pretty much nothing about these sorts of things because I find the language and people typically involved in these fields aggravating at a deeply fundamental level.
      Now do you actually have something constructive to say or can your contribution be summarized as "Lol ur dum!" and nothing else? Any suggestions as to how the issue of The Outer Rims may be solved?

    • @atoll8423
      @atoll8423 10 месяцев назад

      Just like that libertarian town that got overrun by bears?

    • @3dcomrade
      @3dcomrade 8 месяцев назад

      The issue of the Outer Rim would be broken by improving land infrastructure and communications. Together with work programs, affirmation programs especially on local administration and specialized education tailored to the Outer Rim's world
      The benefits will come in a long time. But it will be great. The programs are meant to make every citizen more productive through expertise that is tailored to their home planets' specialty
      The Outer Rim problem is not a population problem, its a produtivity problem

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 8 месяцев назад

      @@3dcomrade Nah. Again, it's far more complicated than 'just build infrastructure lul'. There's any countless number of powers in the galaxy, and the Rim, with a vested interest in keeping the status quo. SW very much operates like a feudal society in some aspects, namely in the massive power of certain noble families/houses, as well as the corporations. To say nothing of the Hutts, naturally.

  • @Gamerafighter76
    @Gamerafighter76 10 месяцев назад +3

    This is what I love about this channel, it breaks down everything to where you can understand it and applies real world scenarios to it. Keep it up, Generation Tech.

  • @jamesbecker875
    @jamesbecker875 10 месяцев назад +5

    Can you please make a separate channel where you talk about world history? I got so interested in what you had to say about the United States military. Listening to you makes me want to learn more about history.

  • @veritasome5965
    @veritasome5965 10 месяцев назад +52

    The TIE Fighter was perhaps the most egregious example of the Navy’s misplaced priorities that led to stagnation & finally defeat.
    The lack of even basic shields ensured a future where very few experienced pilots would survive to train the new recruits or go on to become aces. It also encapsulated the Empire’s arrogant belief that it could somehow endlessly absorb losses in the event of a true conflict, a belief the Rebellion soon proved to be gravely mistaken.
    By contrast, the Rebel’s resource & pilot scarcity saw them prioritize keeping said fighters & pilots alive as best they could. This simple strategy based in pragmatism truly paid off in the long term as, unlike their Imperial counterparts, a mistake wasn’t always fatal & could be built upon to grow them into a seasoned veteran.
    A great example of this is Wedge Antilles. Had he lacked shields during the Death Star trench run, Vader’s shots would likely have destroyed rather than damaged him. Instead, he survived & went on to become the Alliance’s top pilot who caused immeasurable damage to the Empire simply because he had the ability to survive a mistake his Imperial counterparts could not.
    Who knows how many Wedge Antilles might have risen through the Empire’s ranks & had the chance to distinguish themselves only to have their potential prematurely snuffed out simply because the Empire didn’t place their survival at a higher priority?

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +2

      "....and finally defeat..."
      Fighter quality, or lack thereof, isn't what defeated the Empire, though. I urge you to actually consider watching ROTJ, it really is quite good.
      "The lack of even basic shields ensured a future where very few experienced pilots would survive to train..."
      This is nonsense, though, because based off literally almost every piece of visual media in existence, fighter-grade shielding doesn't seem to meaningfully affect survival in combat, nor does this make much of any sense regardless, seeing how the Empire was primarily built for internal policing and peace keeping enforcement. Very, very few pilots would see much combat regardless. And from an alternate perspective; what TIE pilots DO survive heavy combat (even if the idea that being unshielded=TEEHH SUCCKKZZ was entertained) are going to be god-like, and easily relative to even the Rebel's best. Which is...hm, uh, exactly what we see in ANH? UH-OH.
      "It also encapsulated the Empire's arrogant belief that it could somehow endlessly absord losses in the event if a true conflict..."
      Fucking lul what? I don't even know where to start here. Should it be that the idea that the pre-Endor Galactic Civil War being a 'true conflict' is fucking delusonally insane and utterly detached from the source material? Or the idea that the Empire COULDNT absorb whatever relatively miniscule losses it usually took? Or perhaps most amusingly, that the Empire COULDNT take the loss of a few fucking TIE's, despite heing a government that can shit out planet vaporizing battlemoons in total secrecy?
      "Had he lacked shields during the Death Star trench run, Vader's shots likely would have destroyed him..."
      So have you just never watched ANH, or...?

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 10 месяцев назад +6

      I see it as one of those problems that the Empire could never solve without not being an empire: imperial doctrine demanded TIE pilots be dependent on their home ship, otherwise rebel pilots could easily defect and fly away with them if they had the ability to work independently.

    • @SyncViews
      @SyncViews 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@oscaranderson5719 Something the empire could have done if they wanted was have small "carrier" transports without all the long term facilities, like an upscaled transport ring for an entire squadron. I think Star Wars Rebels showed some cases of the empire fielding less than an ISD. The loss of apparently difficult to train crew & pilots seems a bigger oversight though if they had to fight a full scale war.

    • @oscaranderson5719
      @oscaranderson5719 10 месяцев назад

      @@SyncViews they could, and smaller ships did exist, but the smaller they made them the easier it would be for a crew to defect with them. the nebulon-b actually did have a hangar to deploy fighters and it got nicked constantly.
      ah, not to say your assessment isn’t correct- I 100% agree with it- I just see it as realistic that an evil empire would jump to the obvious short-term solution when facing an insurgency.

  • @michaelterry6576
    @michaelterry6576 10 месяцев назад +8

    Was 'the icebreaker nuclear reactors are designed to overload so the crew doesn't starve to death (and they can kill themselves quickly) if they get stuck' a joke?

  • @murderouscow
    @murderouscow 10 месяцев назад +36

    Technically the Death Star was a two of a kind project XD

    • @tenn_ore
      @tenn_ore 10 месяцев назад +4

      Well, without the first Death Star, the second would have also been a long-term project. All of the supply lines and R&D already existed from the first. That's how in three years one could practically operational.

  • @_shades_
    @_shades_ 10 месяцев назад +13

    Great video I love how you make videos about this and real world relation.

  • @benjaminrichey278
    @benjaminrichey278 9 месяцев назад

    Have not seen this channel since 2019. Good to see your still cranking them out.

  • @johnnytower6169
    @johnnytower6169 10 месяцев назад +5

    You’re more likely to use all your fuel before your food on a ship. I served on a class of ship that carried 60-70 thousand litres of fuel and about 8 weeks of food (maybe 10 if you were rationed). Now we could plod along for 8 weeks at 6-8 knots on one engine and one generator. But if we went full noise in secure mode we could use our fuel in less than 72 hours
    Having a reactor just means you don’t need to refuel at any point during a voyage
    If you have fuel on an ice breaker you’re gonna be ok, they’re large ships with plenty of dry and frozen food that they could ration their way outta trouble. Plus having power means you can constantly make your own water with RO plants (or possibly distilling it)
    But you wouldn’t ever purposely meltdown your reactor

  • @tk-6967
    @tk-6967 10 месяцев назад +2

    19:50 The Empire did plenty of the stuff you mentioned, but they just tied it to their own establishments in return. In return for social reforms, better education, housing and wages, people had to work for the Empire, either directly or indirectly.

  • @chuckwootten
    @chuckwootten 9 месяцев назад

    This was excellent! Well researched and scripted. I thoroughly loved it. Well done and thank you.

  • @src6339
    @src6339 8 месяцев назад +3

    Quantity is a quality in as of itself, but the theory neatly ties up the mystery of how the imperials were suddenly able to leapfrog republic design in a galaxy with millennia of technological stagnation.
    _just as a clarification a millennium is a thousand years and "the galaxy" meaning a system of stars, stellar remnants and gases bound together by gravity, not the entire universe_
    Ordinarily i'd credit people as being familiar with such basic foundational concepts in a space based setting, but recent social media experience has shown me that star wars fans have trouble with that.

  • @darkclawgreatonenas
    @darkclawgreatonenas 9 месяцев назад +1

    another problem that you didnt really touch on: the Empire was basically broke in the early days, it was why Paltpy was nationalizing everything so hard. remember, the Clone Wars drained the Old Republic coffers dry, just as it was designed to, but that also means that when the Republic was dissolved to form the Empire it inherited the same problem. Palpy literally had no money to pay for anything, so what he could not nationalize he generally just stole from the rightful owners...

  • @Crimethoughtfull
    @Crimethoughtfull 10 месяцев назад

    Damn, that intro is so intelligent and thoughtful--there's always a bargain to be made, there's always a price to be paid even to be dictator. This whole video is crazy smart! You talking about China reminds me of organizing my Roman Empire in Total War: Rome II, where you basically have "sectors"...had a crap economy until I spent many years and 10s of thousands of gold to specialize each area, then I was UNSTOPPABLE. Love the US/China comparison and the plus and minus of both systems...and how that ties into the SW universe.

  • @crazyschnauzer
    @crazyschnauzer 10 месяцев назад

    Almost there bro. Watching this channel grow over the years has been awesome

  • @chrisheitstuman6360
    @chrisheitstuman6360 10 месяцев назад +3

    The Empire did come out with a great variety of ships, a startling amount in such a short time really, and was able to make a lot in a lot of varieties, not just one.
    The Rebellion/New Republic on the other hand struggled badly in creating and fielding fighters and capital ships and resorted more often than not to Imperial designed ships well into the Vong war and beyond.

  • @johah2454
    @johah2454 Месяц назад

    6:48 haha, I love when he’s talking, that he used a picture of a F-22 Raptor, sitting in the Dayton Ohio Air Force Museum. I love the museum, very cool how they have the different eras broken up , and they do expand on it sometimes. Cool place and I love going there with my grandpa

  • @PragianAlliance
    @PragianAlliance 10 месяцев назад +1

    On the topic of Newport News Aircraft Carriers, something to think about is that while there are few ships being made, they are being consistently made. With no production gaps, expertise is retained. In addition, congress usually has bought two ships at a time to reduce unit costs. Maybe the Empire should build two Death Stars for cost reduction

  • @TetsuShima
    @TetsuShima 10 месяцев назад +35

    It's pretty curious that the main reason Palpatine became obsessed with improving the military forces of the Empire was because he was aware of the Yuuzhan Vong menace and wanted to be prepared for the inevitable invasion. That said, even though the imperials were truly powerful, there's no way they could have won without the help of the Jedi

    • @rapatacush3
      @rapatacush3 10 месяцев назад +1

      Stormtroopers lost to teddy bears with sticks and stones of course they could not fight those aliens alone.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@redenginnerGod I fucking hate this fanbase so much. So much blatant misinformation passed off as factual, so many random, half-recalled, butchered quotes taken out context, and so many little gems like this; wherein a quote from a sarcastic Han is passed down like holy gospel and spread via the grapevine like this, whilst ACTUAL GODDAMN QUOTES wherein Imperials and the Vong themselves admit that the Empire would have obliterated them had it been a few decades early mysteriously never appear in the collective imagination.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@rapatacush3Watch ROTJ ploz.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад

      This entire post is literal nonsense, though. The Empire wasn't preparing for the Vong explictly; this is based on nothing but fanon presumptions, and Imperial apologia. And per everybody from Imperials, the Vong themselves, and basic common sense, we literally know the Empire would have won against the Vong with ease, Jedi or not.

    • @KyloStimpy
      @KyloStimpy 10 месяцев назад

      @@redenginner sounds like something Han would have said

  • @gamerboy6787
    @gamerboy6787 10 месяцев назад

    Dayum. I was NOT expecting a lesson on economics, government spending, and military doctrines from this vid. Thank you.

  • @lek1223
    @lek1223 10 месяцев назад

    Just a small nitpick at 17:00 early on the empire actually used V-wings before they switched to TIE fighters, and the V-wings had hyperdrive which made the Imperial slightly more viable

  • @SizzleCorndog
    @SizzleCorndog 10 месяцев назад +6

    You know the more you look at the empire the more you see George’s analogy to the US in the vietnam war

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 10 месяцев назад

      You missed that the Ewoks were furry Vietcong?

    • @SizzleCorndog
      @SizzleCorndog 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@jonharrison9222 no not that but I meant more the parallels between the empire and the US

  • @raggedbreath
    @raggedbreath 10 месяцев назад +2

    I love how all this analysis is so indepth and well curated and written and really what it boils down to is the fact that is highlighting poor world building by Lucas et al!!?

  • @xulianpintos982
    @xulianpintos982 10 месяцев назад +1

    Great cideo.Keep doing what you are doing , its never been more relevant.

  • @rggardner75
    @rggardner75 2 месяца назад

    I love your content! I hope others can read in between the lines of your “observations “ of Starwars’ lore to present day realities.

  • @corujariousa
    @corujariousa 10 месяцев назад +1

    Very interesting video and delivery. Thanks.

  • @tk-6967
    @tk-6967 10 месяцев назад +1

    16:52 The Bad Batch's portrayal of events is not only logistically ridiculous but doesn't fit with the lore. It should not be taken so seriously as a lore source. The writers seem to be under the impression that the stormtrooper corps is the entire imperial army and that they are poorly trained recruits, and the sheer number of troopers we have seen makes conscription and only a few months training seem like what they are receiving. Furthermore, the idea that this move was somehow hidden from the Galactic population is ridiculous.
    With the Death Star project, it is at least plausible since even most of the workers and scientists have no idea what the project is until later into the design, but the idea that War Mantle was a secret is utter nonsense. Basically, I encourage people to ignore the War Mantle plot line in TBB. We know that clones were largely continuing service, and it is more due to their ageing process and the losses taken in the early years of Imperial rule.
    Starship decommissioning began pretty early, but that process was drawn out for at least 3 years, as we see Venators in the Tarkin novel.

  • @prince_nocturne
    @prince_nocturne 6 месяцев назад

    It's unintentional in many ways (an intentional in a few, too), but this actually explains why the prequel movies look more advanced than the original trilogy, despite being set 20-30 years before. Obviously, IRL reasons like better filming techniques, bigger budgets, better cameras, and advancements in CGI special effects and all that, but it's a nice in-universe explanation there, too.

  • @dachshundyt9085
    @dachshundyt9085 Месяц назад

    12:24 bro you dont just lose an ice breaker. if communication is somehow lost, the rescue team will find you extremely easily and you'll get out in probably less than 2 days

  • @RodimosPrime
    @RodimosPrime 10 месяцев назад +2

    I chuckled when you showed the F35, while you said when you don't have to compete you stagnate.

    • @dylandarnell3657
      @dylandarnell3657 8 месяцев назад

      The F-35 program is slated to replace 3 aircraft programs (the F-16, F/A-18, and A-10) in the US military alone, for less than the combined cost of those programs, while adding stealth and datalink capabilities. It is the most advanced combat aircraft ever invented.
      You want to see stagnation, go ask China how their knockoffs are doing.

    • @dylandarnell3657
      @dylandarnell3657 8 месяцев назад

      Also?
      That aircraft at 6:50 is not the F-35, but the F-22 - the first 5th-gen fighter, the previous title-holder for most advanced combat aircraft ever invented, and probably still the best dogfighter ever produced.

    • @xhydrag0br203
      @xhydrag0br203 3 месяца назад

      @@dylandarnell3657 hahahaha f35 most advanced

    • @dylandarnell3657
      @dylandarnell3657 3 месяца назад

      @@xhydrag0br203 Fake laughter is not an argument - it is evidence that you have not yet graduated from middle school. If you want to disagree, name a fighter aircraft more advanced than the F-35.

  • @mathieugariepy2948
    @mathieugariepy2948 9 месяцев назад +1

    The chinese navy has an advantage in the number of ships, not tonnage.
    Very interesting video as always.

  • @RodimosPrime
    @RodimosPrime 10 месяцев назад +1

    The advantage of the Star Destroyer using turbolasers ment they wouldn't run out of ammo. But it also meant most of their hull was used up by anti matter reactors.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +1

      They don't use anti-matter.

  • @cwalker228
    @cwalker228 10 месяцев назад

    Man I love the thought that goes into these videos!

  • @leonbrooke5587
    @leonbrooke5587 10 месяцев назад +8

    it's important to remember the Imperial military wasn't created to fight symmetrical wars the way the Republic military was. the TIE fighter being low cost but low performance is fine when you consider it wasn't designed to come up against things like X-Wings but pirate ships and un- or lightly-armed freighters. sure when they came up against a more or less equal military force they were found wanting, but that's not what it was designed for
    same thing with the stormtroopers. elite compared to most Imperial soldiers but nothing against well-trained and combat-hardened Rebel soldiers. but they weren't intended to fight other soldiers

    • @angelic_disappointment7889
      @angelic_disappointment7889 9 месяцев назад

      Pulling information out of your arse; we see that Stormtroopers were Elite forces not just compared to “other troops” and we also see that TIE Fighters were able to outclass X-wings in dogfights, low performance my ass

  • @arseneken
    @arseneken 10 месяцев назад

    This channel is slowly turning into space Perun power points and I’m all for it

  • @HolyknightVader999
    @HolyknightVader999 10 месяцев назад +2

    *Laughs in Mid-Rim Retreat, when the Imperial navy sent the Alliance running to the Outer Rim after a big Alliance offensive.*

  • @enoughothis
    @enoughothis 10 месяцев назад +1

    The problem with the TIE fighter is the pilot. The fighter is bare-bones efficiency, the pilot is an elite graduate of one of the most Empire's most prestigious education systems, the Imperial Academy. If the TIE were an autonomous drone ship, it would be perfect.

    • @shcdemolisher
      @shcdemolisher 10 месяцев назад +1

      Agreed, if there were a lot more AI ran fighter ships with the main ship controlling them, it would've saved a lot more personal. Sadly the star wars galaxy has had a few robot rebellions in the past and hates using AI for complex things. Using personal for controlling ships is a tried and true functionality, but lacking in innovation. I believe there was a Legends story where a whole space station was run by an AI and was WAY more effective then being ran by people in terms of defense.

  • @justme98316
    @justme98316 10 месяцев назад

    I once wrote a short story (for my own amusement) where a full mutany took place on a Venator. The pilots were ordered to attack civilian targets and the entire compliment "jumped" away... The Emperor decided immediately to remove jump drives from small ships and move to a Capital ships for greater command and control.

  • @aaront3749
    @aaront3749 10 месяцев назад +4

    China didn’t pass the US and overall tonnage of their navy. They passed the US and the total number of ships in the water. The US still dwarfs the Chinese Navy in total tonnage. With 4.5 million tonnes, the US has more than double that of China.

    • @paulrasmussen8953
      @paulrasmussen8953 10 месяцев назад

      Yup. We ahve about 12 carriers. China has only 4 max

  • @trebacca9
    @trebacca9 10 месяцев назад

    The Empire's approach to military arrangement was reminiscent of Tokugawa Japan, in that they were trying to prioritize loyalty above efficiency. By disbanding the local defense forces, and assigning task groups from the main Imperial Navy to rotate through various sectors, it prevented the military from becoming more attached to the sector than to the Empire as a whole. That way, if they decided to re-specialize a given system against the will of the inhabitants, there was very little chance that the sector fleet would side with the locals.

  • @ironspider23
    @ironspider23 10 месяцев назад +1

    This was a very nice 😊 video I like 👍 it you always do a good job on these videos. Also I love ❤️ you Star Wars videos and your explanations you make about real life you are very good at that have a good Day Allen.

  • @emeraldcityjiujitsu
    @emeraldcityjiujitsu 9 месяцев назад

    Best star wars vids on the tube by far 🙏

  • @hypercube8735
    @hypercube8735 10 месяцев назад +1

    There's a myth that the Imperial Navy is technologically superior? Maybe it's just having grown up on games like Rogue Squadron, but my understanding ever since I was a child was that the Empire has inferior ships to the Rebellion (a TIE fighter for example can't stand up against an X-Wing unless there's a massive advantage in pilot skill on the part of the TIE), they just have a near-overwhelming numerical advantage (which is why the Rebellion mostly limited itself to surgical strikes and hit-and-run attacks).

  • @DIEGhostfish
    @DIEGhostfish 10 месяцев назад +1

    In original EU at least the ISD *Was* superior, perhaps not always in tech but certainly in form-factor there's a reason after several attempts that claimed to be "Even stronger for smaller and cheaper" people *Kept making* ISDs. Even if you were to consider the Mon Mothma and Elegos Ak'la ISD3s, or Interdictor SD2s, and the Anakin Solo an ISD 3, or 4. They kept going back to that well.

  • @L_______
    @L_______ 10 месяцев назад +5

    well the empire did have advanced tech arguably one of the most advanced in all of star wars history while deathstar is one but there are many other the problem is that when it comes to dealing with the avrage soldiers but they did see this problem and later did try to improve the avrage gear and ship both in legends and cannon like the dark trooper project
    the star destroyer was advanced but wasnt suited for fighting against fighters like xwings it was more suited against capital ships so they should have had more venitor like capital ships which is mutch better to deal with fighters which is what they needed against the rebels

    • @dylandarnell3657
      @dylandarnell3657 8 месяцев назад

      The Dark Trooper project was originally in the old EU. And it was better developed there.

    • @L_______
      @L_______ 8 месяцев назад

      @@dylandarnell3657 i know i used it as an example of the empire trying to improve their quality in this case the troopers

  • @xzardas541
    @xzardas541 10 месяцев назад +8

    What i find funny about emprie is that during clone wars they were already at age of carriers.
    And the granpa palps says screw it and goes back to battleships.
    It's like modern navy deciding to abandon carriers and air superiority to go back to lumbering battleships cause they look cooler.
    And the outcome being as you would expect, battleships being sunk by enemy with air superiority.

    • @colinbielat8558
      @colinbielat8558 10 месяцев назад +1

      Because star wars puts an over emphasis on the capabilities of star fighters, which against large cruisers like an ISD lack the weapons to deal any meaningful damage. Even proton torpedoes lack penetration power, we can see the damage one does when it is shot from red leader and fails to go into the thermal exhaust port. It only causes superficial surface damage and this is supposed to be a fighters anti ship weapon, which mind you it's intended targets again are not cruisers but smaller corvettes and frigates. Fact of the matter is that unless a fighter is specifically equipped to deal with heavily armored and shield targets it is not going to be effective against large cruisers, only against other fighters, corvettes and frigates. The ISD is literally the pinnacle of ship of the line design philosophy having significant firepower, 60 turbo lasers and 60 ion cannons, a large complement of craft, 48 TIE ln fighters 12 TIE bombers and 12 TIE rc recon fighters, and the durability to go toe to toe with nearly any other cruiser scale ship and come out on top. Same cannot be said of the venator.

    • @xzardas541
      @xzardas541 10 месяцев назад

      @@colinbielat8558 and it still can't shoot down bunch of fighters and gets bullied by rebels with nothing more than corvetes and a skyscrapper with engines bolted to it.
      This is same lvl of stupid as WW2 battleship being sunk by somalian pirates.
      And if you are going to use this battle as a reference for fighters anti ship capabilities I would like to remind you that 5min earlier SSD got destroyed by some random dude ramming it with a fighter, even concentrating forward firepower did not help.

    • @colinbielat8558
      @colinbielat8558 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@xzardas541 rouge one is one of the worst star wars movies ever made, people only like it for the Vader hallway scene. Anything in that movie should even be brought up in any arguments. 120 guns on an ISD will put up a wall of fire that will either completely vaporizer a fighter or fry its electronics and focing them to continue on their trajectory until they crash into something or die from lack of oxygen.

    • @xzardas541
      @xzardas541 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@colinbielat8558 I was referencing original trilogy but sure, whatever you say.

    • @angelic_disappointment7889
      @angelic_disappointment7889 9 месяцев назад

      @@xzardas541we see many times that Star Destroyers had the accuracy to hit smaller targets, even though the millennium falcon was more bigger than an X-wing, the hit;miss ratio was actually pretty good, so really I’d say hitting an enemy fighter each 8 shots or so isn’t a stretch, and also what happened at endor was pure storytelling nonsense

  • @StarShadowPrimal
    @StarShadowPrimal 10 месяцев назад +2

    For obvious reasons, the Empire's military tech compares well to the WW 2 Axis powers. The constant need to build the biggest and most powerful units consumed the resources that could have been better used elsewhere on more standardized and common units. Replace 1/2 - 3/4 of the ISDs with the same credit cost in vastly more lighter ships (frigates, escort carriers, etc) and upgrade most TIEs to int or adv, and I doubt the rebels would have survived long enough for Luke to join.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад +2

      This isn't actually how military spending nor industrial production nor gurellia warfare works in the slightest.

    • @StarShadowPrimal
      @StarShadowPrimal 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@papapalps2415 Yeah, that username just proves my point. And for your information, authoritarian dictators do in fact have significant control over their militaries and military spending. Then there's the direct actual examples of those individuals pulling production and funding from general military spending to fund personal pet projects.

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад

      @@StarShadowPrimal Right, but it isn't, though. You can't just magically dump money in the ways you are whining about, nor is this how standardized mass production works, nor, most amusing of all, is any of this even accurate to the source material anyways, as ISDs already made up 1% or less of the fleet.

    • @StarShadowPrimal
      @StarShadowPrimal 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@papapalps2415 Look, we get it. You are salty because your namesake was a miserably poor leader who lost everything he had stolen to a small resistance movement. He nearly collapsed the galactic economy to build 2 moon-sized space stations for the sake of causing fear, but they failed so badly that combined they destroyed nearly as many Imperial bases/cities/planets in tests as they did enemy capital ships in actual battle.
      He built something like 25,000 Star Destroyers as do-everything massive generalist designs that were regularly destroyed by vastly more efficient and inexpensive groups of specialists. Military design SHOULDN'T work that way, but it very much did and Palpatine paid the price for his hubris..

    • @papapalps2415
      @papapalps2415 10 месяцев назад

      @@StarShadowPrimal "Look, we get it..."
      Who is 'we'...?
      "You are salty because your namesake was a miserably poor leader..."
      And your proof of this is...?
      "...who lost everything he had to stolen to a small resistance movement..."
      That isn't what happened, though. He, and the Empire by extension, lost because he died due to a eleventh hour, last possible second betrayal by his right hand man/the literal Chosen One, in a moment prophesied about for thousands of years and guaranteed by the Force itself to remove the blight on itself that the Sith represented, and which Sidious embodied.
      "He nearly collapsed the Galactic economy..."
      Yes, sweetie. He almost collapsed it so bad, infact, that....uh, literally almost nobody noticed or was the wiser to the first one being built, nor the exponentially, orders of magnitude larger and more powerful second, both of which being built in total secrecy, in the middle of nowhere, with no preexisting logistics train or support. And then, a scant few years/decades afterwards, a small splinter movement of said government then went on to hollow out a planet and build an EVEN LARGER AND MORE POWERFUL version, in even MORE secrecy than before, alongside a full galaxy conquering navy (much of these arguments also pertain to the old canon, as well).
      "...but they failed so badly..."
      ...That they had to instantly and immediately targeted by the Rebellion in force, as otherwise they represented an existential threat to their continued existence and any further resistance to the Empire, yes.
      "...that were regularly destroyed..."
      Lul no.
      "...by vastly more efficient..."
      They weren't, no.
      "Military design SHOULDNT work in way..."
      I fucking love when RUclips randoms try to bullshit their way to victory by just throwing endless amounts of meandering bile at me like you came up with it yourself.

  • @barometricfunk
    @barometricfunk 10 месяцев назад

    One small technicality - Lockheed Martin and Boeing's partnership in ULA is not new. ULA was created in 2005. If it's in the news recently, it's b/c it's rumored that either Boeing or Lockheed wants to sell it.

  • @iainballas
    @iainballas 10 месяцев назад

    "When droid fighters start strafing your apartment you are going to completely change your priorities in life and how you vote... all you care about is security"
    Yeah, that right there sums up Palpatine's final steps in his rise to power. He centralized all power in the galaxy around Coruscant. Then, he made Coruscant afraid. Then, he took control of it. Wham, bam, suddenly he's the man.

  • @IIIC3YLOCO
    @IIIC3YLOCO 2 месяца назад

    I wish there was a vid about how the way effected the Galaxy in all ways like economics, finances , logistics etc

  • @a_Minion_of_Soros
    @a_Minion_of_Soros 10 месяцев назад +2

    That point about the icebreaker reacator being a suicide button? x for doubt. Source?

  • @SmokeAndKnifeBBQ72
    @SmokeAndKnifeBBQ72 10 месяцев назад +1

    It's easy to win fights when your tactics are based on swarms or over saturation.

  • @Transit_Biker
    @Transit_Biker 9 месяцев назад

    To quote Obi Wan: "Not as clumsy or random as a blaster; an elegant weapon for a more civilized age." This seems fitting when comparing republic era anything, especially ships vs the empire!

  • @Phantom6.6.6
    @Phantom6.6.6 10 месяцев назад +3

    Advanced maybe. quality maybe. Hit hard and painful definitely. The tech hasnt advanced much but it has become somewhat more efficient and powerful or output more power

  • @andrewdacunha5695
    @andrewdacunha5695 10 месяцев назад

    The empire's major flaw was the fact that it was trying to keep its military from being able to rebel. The fighters were not hyperspace capable and the capital ships were only meant for line of sight combat, everything was compartmentalized to prevent defections thereby rebels would be nervous about killing the innocent crew that did not want to be there and the like. This complete lack of trust lead to a fleet that was operational crippled when compared to other fleets like the GRA or CIS

  • @anonymousrex5207
    @anonymousrex5207 10 месяцев назад

    I keep hoping they bring back the Vong in canon and go into the fact that Palpatine knew they were coming and focused so much of his efforts on mass producing as many ships and mega-weapons as he could in an effort to be ready for them. The end result was the "paper tiger", which was focused more on intimidation than practical use in the end, but with the new additions of things like the final order and the star destroyers with planet killers attached to them, they could still go in the direction that all of this was done to fight the Vong invasion.

  • @bobbydavis3777
    @bobbydavis3777 10 месяцев назад

    Love how Alan fixed the outer rim issue in like 15 seconds lol

  • @DoremiFasolatido1979
    @DoremiFasolatido1979 10 месяцев назад +1

    No corporation has ANY R&D costs. Theyre almost always fully subsidized by the government. It doesnt cost the corporations a penny.

  • @karlthorsten9118
    @karlthorsten9118 8 месяцев назад

    Late comment, but I hope you see this, Alan.
    WHAT IF... the Empire did produce the Star Destroyers and TIE Fighters, but NEVER phased out the Venators and Clone Troopers? What if they mixed it all together instead. Clone Trooper program is scaled down but kept working due to the training and efficiency of clone troopers, and Venators are grouped with a single ISD, like say, 1 ISD in the Corellian Sector, and it has command of 2-4 Venators. The TIE line is all equipped with light shields and a low rangehyperdrive, but they also retain their V wings, and the Venators are refitted to handle large amounts of the TIE Line.
    Feel free to rework the events of the Bad Batch a bit, which shows us how the Empire steadily removed every trade of the Old Republic even in it's first few years, the Senate being the LAST remnant of the Old Republic to be swept away.

  • @johnsteiner3417
    @johnsteiner3417 9 месяцев назад +1

    France has a supercarrier that they built themselves. India is working on one of their own.

  • @InventiveHarvest
    @InventiveHarvest 10 месяцев назад

    I can see some commercial uses for the death star. You could use it for mining - destroying a planet so that the valuable chunks are easier to transport. Also, if you had two death stars, you could use them to measure gravity waves.

  • @MisterRorschach90
    @MisterRorschach90 6 месяцев назад

    This is why I really like the idea of the Jedi succeeding in ousting palpatine when anakin tells mace windu that he’s a Sith Lord. They call for obi wan and yoda to return, along with whoever else is the best duelist. Then they confront sidious and he’s only able to retreat with anakins help. This leads to sidious taking over the separatist forces and making it his new empire. Suddenly their battle droids become considerably more advanced and powerful. Their commanders including anakin are more competent. And the clone army is mostly destroyed when sidious enacts order 66 as his last order while on the run.

  • @jameslewis2635
    @jameslewis2635 10 месяцев назад +1

    The Empire never came across as being technologically superior to me, they were just working on a larger scale due to the sheer amount of resources available to them. Yes, the Death Star could destroy a planet but it was pretty much just a giant blaster in space the size of a small moon with a hyperdrive attached. The only points where I could see them showing an actual technological edge is with the interdictor cruisers. Where it comes to the actual equipment used, the units fielded by the Rebel Alliance always seemed of a higher quality apart from when they didn't have access to what they want and just jury rigged something to do a job.

  • @drewyourhostwiththeghost
    @drewyourhostwiththeghost 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you for that insightful diatribe and I mean that in a good way. This should be required watching for Canada's Government.

  • @battleshipradiotv2005
    @battleshipradiotv2005 10 месяцев назад +1

    Dudes, and gals, there is a damn giant Venator Class Star Destroyer graveyard??! Zats Mega disrespectful to those splendid warships damnitt.
    P.S.
    Extremely glorious and educational video as always.
    Its a very interesting situation where, one can be so determined to do away with everything from an era you despise for traumatic reasons, governmental reasons or what not, that you are unable to see the little truths to be found therein that could greatly aid thee in the direction ye wish to go. A mighty scroll right there.

  • @Grz349
    @Grz349 8 месяцев назад

    In would argue that the Empire overspecialised, Star destroyers and TIE fighters might have been useful in a straight fight against another power, but they were always too large for anti piracy operations.
    Great for suppressing and securing planets in full rebellion, but not for tracking down and eliminating a small number of pirates or rebels that avoided focusing their forces in that way.

  • @Reoh0z
    @Reoh0z 10 месяцев назад +1

    How government departmental economics work... "We need to waste as much money as possible so it gets used up, otherwise they'll cut our budget next review."

  • @Zippy1527
    @Zippy1527 10 месяцев назад +1

    I feel like the empire was always destined to fail and fall from day one.

  • @ultragodzillafan
    @ultragodzillafan 10 месяцев назад +1

    Hey Gen Tech, I was wondering: Would the Venator class destroyers compliment the TIE fighter progam more effectivley, or would that type of fighter be out clased regardless of what type of capital ships they were paired with?

    • @colinbielat8558
      @colinbielat8558 10 месяцев назад

      Venators wouldn't do s***. For one they would require significant time in dry dock to have the storage racks installed in them, if they can even be installed at all in a venator. And even then the venator is a very horriblely designed ship, it has to much open space that can cause explosive decompression, is entirely reliant on internal tensor fields to keep its hull together due to the huge open space and lacks the necessary armaments to go toe to toe with more armored cruisers.

  • @simonnachreiner8380
    @simonnachreiner8380 3 месяца назад

    The Imperial military really shows the benefits and downsides of extensive centralization of power. By scaling up things get massively cheaper via economy of scale. However that centralization causes stagnation.

  • @nihili4196
    @nihili4196 10 месяцев назад

    I feel like you're forgetting that empire started in amazing position. Whole galaxy was ravaged by war, a lot of planets were barely hanging military wise as they were either mainly dependent on clone army or just lost whole army when droids has been deactivated.
    Empire could go cheap but effective because they were by far the biggest player. And their army was actively siphoning military able people from planets, so no one really was left to fight wars. Only people able to afford things that could give Tie Fighters run for their money were gangs and crime lords, and those usually weren't exactly interested in owning whole planets, at least not officially.

  • @gnaruto7769
    @gnaruto7769 10 месяцев назад

    Correction: the chinese navy is still vastly smaller in terms of tonnage. They have massive numbers, outnumbering american ships more than 2-1, but still is less than 1/3 of tonnage

  • @IStealButterdToast
    @IStealButterdToast 10 месяцев назад +5

    Speaking of The Empire, I also think that the stormtroopers air support (TIE fighters) could’ve kept the Republic V-Wing, but just slap some grey paint and the Solar panels on the wings, and get rid of the astromech, and you have a superior Tie Fighter

    • @angelic_disappointment7889
      @angelic_disappointment7889 9 месяцев назад

      The V-wing was not in anyway superior to the TIE Fighters besides from having a small number of concussion missiles.
      Otherwise, the TIE Fighter completely outclassed it in Speed, Maneuverability, Laser Cannon firepower, and Targeting Systems.

  • @Monkey_cracy
    @Monkey_cracy 10 месяцев назад +2

    Like the myth of German technological superiority in world war two Wunderwaffe as an example and Tanks .

  • @thelazarous
    @thelazarous 10 месяцев назад

    As someone who has about 2000 hours in Empire At War, all my planets are specialized. Each planet gets it's one thing that it produces and that's that.