Well, he meant "listen to my lawful orders", and compliance with lawful orders is kind of a given. The principle was within his rights to aske them to leave the property, and the police (calmly here) did their job in enforcing that.
So much better to police by consent rather than force - threats of arrests for peaceful protest is over the top. Well done to everyone standing up there.
Sue who? The bozo protesters? Because it's a public school does not give them the automatic right to be there. They came to protest, and they were told they could leave and protest on the road. End of story.
Not all of them,only those that licking the ass off those in charge.This regime really needs to go,that corrupt leadership turning everything upside down, ruining lives of millions and millions good American citizens!
Believe it a public school is public property but it also is an institution and they will arrest you for anything that threatens their agendas. A teacher gets your son to crossdress or speaks about their gay relations and you go to the office to complain, just know you might be arrested. Home school your kids.
Oh, so do you think the 'deep state' county sheriff's office were helping to further the schools 'agenda' which in this case was to hold an athletic event? I'm wondering which adult 'groomed' you to be so whiny?
We have voted for our sheriff twice now because he's a great sheriff. He won out twice to a Q-anon, 'constitutional sheriff who was being supported by the Island Co. Republic Party, who even most Republicans can't stand.
I suggest you act as the attorney for these whiners and see how fast you all get laughed out of court. Oh, I forgot, you want to whine about the courts being corrupt too!
Exactly how many girls are in boys sports after the age of 12? Only time I ever saw this was when that sport didn’t exist for females and for them to compete they HAD to join a boys league.
@@freedda1 I will when it happens in my state, Copsucker. Not states away from me. Keep cheering for males in female sports. That's the only way ppl like you have a chance in a competition.
People can be asked to leave if the people controlling the property - which in this case are the school officials - don't feel these people had legitimate business there, which they didn't.
@@freedda1people can't be removed from public property that is open to the public for exercising their first amendment rights. Here is an example of cops upholding the constitution. ruclips.net/video/rmtS-eSgoWI/видео.htmlsi=MOBjRKqAXxzvNjQq
If a justice of the SCOTUS can’t define a woman why is the sheriff deputy expecting these parents to understand the difference between women and men athletes?
Many of these people don't live in the school district, so no, it wasn't their local property tax dollars at work. I do live there, and what if I came with signs, saying "Death Israel"? Should I also be allowed on a public school, since it is my tax dollars?
"He gives the principal, John Patton, the authority to remove people he doesn't want around... It should be noted that the police department did not see anything wrong." Hmm. OK. The police officer didn't give the Principal the authority to remove people, the Principle has that authority as the controlling authority of the property. He doesn't have to state any reason, in the same way that you don't have to state any reason if you ask me to leave your house, so it doesn't matter that the police didn't see anything wrong. It doesn't mattter that the property is publicly owned (as a public school), because public ownership and public access are two different things. In case law on tresspass, public property is deemed to be owned "by another" and the tresspasser must leave when asked by competent authority. A judge can order you out of a court room, a county officer can order you out of the county office etc etc. What I am saying is DON'T BLAME THE POLICE for doing their job (and in a nice, calm way at that). If you want to blame someone, blame the Principle for not allowing the peaceful protest to take place.
Well you're wrong; they cannot "legally" trespass someone from public property, without a crime being committed. Time, Place, and Manner Apply. Exercising their 1st amendment rights to peacefully protest on public property TRUMPS ANY local rule/law that they are trying to enforce here. People really need to educate themselves on what the Supremacy Clause is, and what the rules and procedures of federal criminal procedure are; then follow Rule 21 (change of venue) because you're not going to get a fair shake in some local municipality; where you get a commissioner for a magistrate (not an Article 3 judge) that's golfing buddies with the DA. Once in federal court, 42 USC section 1983, Turner vs Driver Supreme Court ruling, and possibly Monroe vs Pape (1961) Supreme Court ruling; against cops for violating their civil rights. All the crap that you regurgitated; means absolutely nothing; but have a blessed day.
@@amcconnell6730 public officials are not authorized to remove the public from publicly accessible areas of public property. The first amendment protects the people from tyrants who you think should be allowed to decide who is "shifty".
Stop saying it was feminism. Women want to be safe and egual oppotunies... Not men watching them pee and take away their prize. It's universities et lobby like Stonewall
Liar! You have to be trespassed then come back on the property to be arrested. Even denied them freedom of speech. Big error if that's public property.
All those people and only one cop? Why didn't they just all walk in, he could only physically arrest one person! This whole thing was total stupidity apart from the fact of their reason to protest.
These schools and police are so far out of line on this issue it's very sad. Our children deserve so much better. Until this issue is resolved all parents should simply pull their daughters out of these unfair competition and that would end this situation fast. They would have total control by doing that.
Youve been tresspassed for protesting at the event finally police doing their job. Too many times we see protestors blocking roads raillines.. other events and police stand by with thumbs up their butts.. so on one hand good on the cop and the property manager type guy.. protest in the street.. Now.. do i agree with your protest. Absolutely.. there should be no boys completing with girls.. at least post puberty if you can ever define that. Take your protest to the school and school board. To the state legistialature. Do it where it counts. Arkensaw is passing a state law to ban the BS and give gorla sports back to girls.. There is a law suit against the NCAA for the same thing.. there is some momentum happening to reverse this BS of redefining what a girl or women is.. get on that train.
It is likely that we just passed a large construction bond measure for the S. Whidbey schools, so I look forward to paying a portion of my property tax to go towards these schools!
Who cares if guys are in Womens sports. Women play in mens sports and everyone is jumping for joy and congratulating them. I saw one in high school and college. Why cant it go both ways.
Weather you are correct or not is not the issue here. All we're seeing isca law enforcementofficer doing his job, removing unwanted protesters from a school event. @@lattedee2523
When he says listen he means comply. When they do not comply he can't fathom they don't get it.
Listen does not mean comply.
Well, he meant "listen to my lawful orders", and compliance with lawful orders is kind of a given. The principle was within his rights to aske them to leave the property, and the police (calmly here) did their job in enforcing that.
So much better to police by consent rather than force - threats of arrests for peaceful protest is over the top. Well done to everyone standing up there.
Save women's sports! ✊
It’s time to sue them for civil rights violations!
Sue who? The bozo protesters? Because it's a public school does not give them the automatic right to be there. They came to protest, and they were told they could leave and protest on the road. End of story.
Somebody let them know that they didn’t have to leave. And they also have a lawsuit against that officer and public employee.
Aw, you are so cute when you pretend to be a lawyer. Make sure to stop off for your Happy Meal before headed off to court.
@@freedda1 How you know I like happy meals 😂 🐑🐑🐑🐑
@@freedda1hey sheep girl…. You are what’s wrong with America right now.
Gotta love how the police have become a standing army over the last 20 years.
And do you now want to 'defund them' like your an anarchists?
Not all of them,only those that licking the ass off those in charge.This regime really needs to go,that corrupt leadership turning everything upside down, ruining lives of millions and millions good American citizens!
Believe it a public school is public property but it also is an institution and they will arrest you for anything that threatens their agendas. A teacher gets your son to crossdress or speaks about their gay relations and you go to the office to complain, just know you might be arrested. Home school your kids.
Oh, so do you think the 'deep state' county sheriff's office were helping to further the schools 'agenda' which in this case was to hold an athletic event? I'm wondering which adult 'groomed' you to be so whiny?
That cop has no morals
So sad. Unfortunately, that boy will win games but be a loser all his life.
If that's public property they have a lawsuit to file.
I suggest you file it for them, and maybe act as their attorney too.
Who is the High Sheriff in that County! This is not good for his Elected Position!
We have voted for our sheriff twice now because he's a great sheriff. He won out twice to a Q-anon, 'constitutional sheriff who was being supported by the Island Co. Republic Party, who even most Republicans can't stand.
If it’s public property you don’t have to leave! Most people don’t know their rights and it’s so damn wrong!
I think they knew but can they go against a officer order,be arrested and all. That hard to go against people who abuse of their autority
I suggest you act as the attorney for these whiners and see how fast you all get laughed out of court. Oh, I forgot, you want to whine about the courts being corrupt too!
Boys in girls sports is wrong. Then keep the girls out of boys sports, but no that's cute!
Seriously they can't have it both ways!
Exactly how many girls are in boys sports after the age of 12? Only time I ever saw this was when that sport didn’t exist for females and for them to compete they HAD to join a boys league.
@@cplg2111usmcthey really don’t
I guess the phrase "Back the blue, until it happens to you" is starting to resonate with people?
Or back the protesters until they aren’t protesting whatever you support.
Just the Threat of Arrest is a Law Suit in itself.!
It is? What lawsuit do you intend to file on behalf of these whiners?
@@freedda1whiners?? You are pathetic
I would have stayed, gotten arrested, then sued the county.
Well you should join their protest the next time they show up somewhere and get arrested, instead of sitting on your butt whining.
@@freedda1 I will when it happens in my state, Copsucker. Not states away from me. Keep cheering for males in female sports. That's the only way ppl like you have a chance in a competition.
Public property is public property until a police officer tells you its not. Thought this was a free country
Did they issue trespass warning in writing?
People can be asked to leave if the people controlling the property - which in this case are the school officials - don't feel these people had legitimate business there, which they didn't.
@@freedda1people can't be removed from public property that is open to the public for exercising their first amendment rights. Here is an example of cops upholding the constitution.
ruclips.net/video/rmtS-eSgoWI/видео.htmlsi=MOBjRKqAXxzvNjQq
If a justice of the SCOTUS can’t define a woman why is the sheriff deputy expecting these parents to understand the difference between women and men athletes?
Is that facility paid by their tax dollars? Then that's illegal.
Stop paying taxes.
Many of these people don't live in the school district, so no, it wasn't their local property tax dollars at work. I do live there, and what if I came with signs, saying "Death Israel"? Should I also be allowed on a public school, since it is my tax dollars?
"He gives the principal, John Patton, the authority to remove people he doesn't want around... It should be noted that the police department did not see anything wrong."
Hmm. OK. The police officer didn't give the Principal the authority to remove people, the Principle has that authority as the controlling authority of the property. He doesn't have to state any reason, in the same way that you don't have to state any reason if you ask me to leave your house, so it doesn't matter that the police didn't see anything wrong. It doesn't mattter that the property is publicly owned (as a public school), because public ownership and public access are two different things. In case law on tresspass, public property is deemed to be owned "by another" and the tresspasser must leave when asked by competent authority. A judge can order you out of a court room, a county officer can order you out of the county office etc etc.
What I am saying is DON'T BLAME THE POLICE for doing their job (and in a nice, calm way at that). If you want to blame someone, blame the Principle for not allowing the peaceful protest to take place.
Well you're wrong; they cannot "legally" trespass someone from public property, without a crime being committed. Time, Place, and Manner Apply. Exercising their 1st amendment rights to peacefully protest on public property TRUMPS ANY local rule/law that they are trying to enforce here. People really need to educate themselves on what the Supremacy Clause is, and what the rules and procedures of federal criminal procedure are; then follow Rule 21 (change of venue) because you're not going to get a fair shake in some local municipality; where you get a commissioner for a magistrate (not an Article 3 judge) that's golfing buddies with the DA. Once in federal court, 42 USC section 1983, Turner vs Driver Supreme Court ruling, and possibly Monroe vs Pape (1961) Supreme Court ruling; against cops for violating their civil rights.
All the crap that you regurgitated; means absolutely nothing; but have a blessed day.
It should be noted that the Langley Police don't have jurisdiction in the county, so it doesn't matter what their opinion is.
The principal does not have authority to remove people from public property that is publicly accessible for exercising their first amendment rights.
@@vax20051 A school principal can't remove people from school grounds? Any shifty bloke can hang about, as long as they have a protest sign?
@@amcconnell6730 public officials are not authorized to remove the public from publicly accessible areas of public property. The first amendment protects the people from tyrants who you think should be allowed to decide who is "shifty".
Fat lawsuit coming.
Was this a public school ? If so they should be able to be there .
Isn't this what modern day feminist wanted. Males and females can now compete among each other.
No, they wanted equal pay for equal work, that kind of thing, not that they’re actually equal biologically and physically to men.
Stop saying it was feminism. Women want to be safe and egual oppotunies... Not men watching them pee and take away their prize.
It's universities et lobby like Stonewall
if it is a public school, paid by taxes from the people of the town etc, why is it classed as private property?
All: KNOW Your rights. Record everything. Good work!🗣️💪🥳❤️
Liar! You have to be trespassed then come back on the property to be arrested. Even denied them freedom of speech. Big error if that's public property.
Lawsuit all day
All those people and only one cop? Why didn't they just all walk in, he could only physically arrest one person! This whole thing was total stupidity apart from the fact of their reason to protest.
Even adults don't follow police rules
These schools and police are so far out of line on this issue it's very sad. Our children deserve so much better. Until this issue is resolved all parents should simply pull their daughters out of these unfair competition and that would end this situation fast. They would have total control by doing that.
Speak up and defend your kids. Start your own groups if you have to and homeschool if you can.
Youve been tresspassed for protesting
at the event finally police doing their job. Too many times we see protestors blocking roads raillines.. other events and police stand by with thumbs up their butts.. so on one hand good on the cop and the property manager type guy.. protest in the street..
Now.. do i agree with your protest. Absolutely.. there should be no boys completing with girls.. at least post puberty if you can ever define that. Take your protest to the school and school board. To the state legistialature. Do it where it counts.
Arkensaw is passing a state law to ban the BS and give gorla sports back to girls.. There is a law suit against the NCAA for the same thing.. there is some momentum happening to reverse this BS of redefining what a girl or women is.. get on that train.
When does the taxpayers stop paying taxes on this private property?
It is likely that we just passed a large construction bond measure for the S. Whidbey schools, so I look forward to paying a portion of my property tax to go towards these schools!
I love trolls like you.
Who cares if guys are in Womens sports. Women play in mens sports and everyone is jumping for joy and congratulating them. I saw one in high school and college. Why cant it go both ways.
Because it defeats the purpose of having women's sports and Title Nine.
Weather you are correct or not is not the issue here. All we're seeing isca law enforcementofficer doing his job, removing unwanted protesters from a school event. @@lattedee2523
Women play in boys leagues when women leagues are NOT available. HUUUUUUGE difference.
Coward Sheriff won't stand up for the law!