Hydrogen: Nature's Fuel

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 янв 2025

Комментарии • 734

  • @reddlion
    @reddlion 2 года назад +15

    @16:22 This guy is speaking the truth. Listen to what he says and you'll understand why names like Salter, Meyer and Mayne have been left out of this conversation and video. If an on demand splitter can be installed in a pump station then the same splitter can be added to the vehicle. No need for storage if used immediately. Of course that would eliminate the opportunity for a lot of money to be made.

    • @xtdyuoz123
      @xtdyuoz123 2 года назад

      No, this guy is wrong. It would be completely cost inefficient. To fill a hydrogen car of 5kg of H2 in 3 minutes (current average), you need a flow of an average of 28 grams/second (actually, current standards of peak flow rates are of 60g/s, because the flow of H2 cannot be constant, but let's ignore this for simplicity purposes). A kg of hydrogen contains 33,3 kWh of energy (LHV), so 28g contain about 1kWh. Filling 1kWh per second means a power output of ... 3,6 MW. This is ridiculous for several reasons :
      1) You would need a 3,6 MW eletrolyser, just for charging 1 car. Such an electrolyser costs millions, and will work only a fraction of the time, i.e. when vehicles are charging, so id would be a high CAPEX asset running at very low use rate.
      2) Imagine a car plugging itself to the grid, consuming 3,6 MW instantly for about 3 mins, then plugging out... No electrical distribution grid is able to withstand such harsh power consumption variations, let alone doing this for thousands of vehicles charging at the same time.
      3) You still need to compress the hydrogen, and assuming you have no buffer storage you'd need a ridiculously powerful compressor
      4) All your auxiliaries (H2 cooler, dryer, etc.) would also be designed to withstand the high variations
      In short, it is much more efficient to have all your infrastructure downsized by several orders of magnitude, smooth out all these processes and to store H2 before distributing it.
      Bonus point : you can't just add H2 distribution points beside traditional fuels for safety reasons. There are safety distances between the infrastructures required by regulatory authorities (usually several meters, depending on where you live).

    • @MrEuroWolfie
      @MrEuroWolfie 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@xtdyuoz123just which company you work with I wonder? I've watched a video about a very smart person build a buggy in the 80s at home with his h2 generation on demand from a 2L soda bottle.. no need for electric motor immediately but it's beneficial to generate $ saying it has to generate huge amount of power ergo as u write it must be super compressed bigger amount needed to be readily available on demand...yada yada
      U not wrong and obviously smart but you preach the same thing as the developers want ppl to know only

  • @DeepWebDiary
    @DeepWebDiary 2 года назад +6

    Felt like I was in a 1980s infomercial watching this.

  • @JR-kk6ce
    @JR-kk6ce 2 года назад +1

    Mr. Ensco, you have made the long line of your family, going back to the beginning, proud.

  • @Kingleazard
    @Kingleazard 2 года назад +27

    Extracting H2 from H2O or CH4 is basically using more electricity to make less electricity. Simple physics.

    • @sneedchuck5477
      @sneedchuck5477 2 года назад +6

      just like charging a battery?

    • @Kingleazard
      @Kingleazard 2 года назад

      @@sneedchuck5477 indeed.

    • @Kingleazard
      @Kingleazard 2 года назад

      @@sneedchuck5477 indeed, but H extraction needs at the end of the process, far more energy than just nuclear electricity into an electric engine.

    • @wopmf4345FxFDxdGaa20
      @wopmf4345FxFDxdGaa20 2 года назад +7

      Two things; No need to use electricity. Use heat, and there is many massive waste heat sources. Think about a nuclear power plant. You may have 4000 MW of thermal power, but only 1500 MW of electrical power. The remaining 2500 MW is completely wasted. You can produce hydrogen with thermochemical water splitting that requires heat. Only one example of many waste heat streams in energy production. Also solar heat can be used. Second thing is that there is also cases where even using electricity directly makes sense. This case is when there is over production of electricity in the grid, that is a common occurence when you have a lot of renewable production. Either you store with some efficiency, or you don't store at all, when you get the worst of all; 0% efficiency.

    • @kimepp2216
      @kimepp2216 2 года назад +7

      Except hydrogen can fuel your car in 10 minutes instead of waiting for your car to charge for an hour to a day.
      Using non carbon sourced electricity to produce power keeps it green.

  • @aguerra1381
    @aguerra1381 2 года назад +4

    So what about Stanley Meyer's system of on board electrolysis for internal combustion engines? No infrastructure necessary.

  • @josemathew9087
    @josemathew9087 2 года назад +13

    Sodium pellets wrapped in Aluminum foils may be kept in normal tanks. Pellets may be conveyed to a small chamber and watet may be sprayed over. Hydrogen gas will evolve for Engines or Fuel Cells. The effluent Sodium Hydroxide can be eloctrolised to recover Sodium. This will simplify the Hydrogen storage and carrying problems. Energy density would be 30% of Gasoline by weight. May be evaluated and tested.

    • @moonshiner2977
      @moonshiner2977 2 года назад +2

      and errrrr, how you going to produce these aluminium foil pellets ? surely you are not going to burn yet more coal to smelt the ore ???

    • @zacherysellards4275
      @zacherysellards4275 2 года назад +2

      That is basically what Bob Lazar did in the 80's.

    • @sotrue2976
      @sotrue2976 2 года назад

      @@moonshiner2977 doh,have you not heard of wind and solar

    • @moonshiner2977
      @moonshiner2977 2 года назад +1

      @@sotrue2976 doh, have you worked out how much ore has to be refined and smelted to create the copper wire and all the oil that has to be processed into turbines for solar power, and all the smelting required to smelt the iron supports for the structures ? NO! didn't think you had :)

    • @lilmaxAlarcxn
      @lilmaxAlarcxn 2 года назад +1

      Yep lye and aluminum pellets can be together in a tank separated by a membrane. Activated by a spray of hydrogen then dryed and reused by burning the fuel. That's a good idea let's build it.

  • @Domo69420
    @Domo69420 2 года назад +4

    3:24 the irony. Look at all the energy it takes to get the oil

  • @matthewconner463
    @matthewconner463 Год назад +2

    Innovating & Eco friendly concept

  • @Gismotronics
    @Gismotronics 2 года назад +23

    As liquified H acts like a batter in its own right, imagine a large solar panel array next to the sea in North Africa. This could probably double-up as a desalination plant? Use the solar generated electricity to split the H from the sea water. Although electrolysis is not particularly efficient, it doesn't matter as the solar panel array would be focused on generate H from sea water and compressing/liquifying it. The transport the liquified H around the world. Remember, electricity can't be transported over wires more than about 500 miles. This to me is the core of the Hydrogen Economy. EV cars may still be around for a long time as the battery tech improves and there is already a fair amount of charging station infrastructure. However, can use H for trucks and all heavy transport, industrial applications, heating homes and so on.
    Although I am not a fan of Globalism, there is a benefit to having relatively poor countries around the equator be the focus of the large solar array farms to generate the H. It's good if those poor countries benefit and increase their wealthy through the export of H.

    • @Nick-jf7ku
      @Nick-jf7ku 2 года назад +4

      or make better solar cells that have more than 20-25% efficiency and NONE of what you said is needed, duh!!

    • @paulsutton5896
      @paulsutton5896 2 года назад +1

      Sandy Monro (automotive manufacturing guru) has made a video about storing hydrogen on thin film with a coating of hydrides. This is an American invention, but similar processes exist elsewhere.

    • @blanknone5408
      @blanknone5408 2 года назад

      Liquid hydrogen is too volatile to transport around the world in a pipeline. Won’t work.

    • @MM2009
      @MM2009 2 года назад

      If its coming from North Africa, we will end up funding radical islamists from this region. Then we will have a bigger problem than Putin.

    • @xermasboo5401
      @xermasboo5401 2 года назад +1

      Considering batteries don't bother to use Nickel or long lasting durable material, and instead people focus on electricity density instead would make batteries less than desirable to the average person. If companies focus on making batteries last longer on the material side first it would allow more and more people get into them because they don't have to replace as much. This, also, means less and less overall waste and heavy metal poisoning of the ground from dumps and mining.

  • @outofthebox5441
    @outofthebox5441 2 года назад +2

    I invest in platinum bullion and coins because of it having a huge upside in the future devopment of hydrogen technology, so i do hope to see hydrogen fuel cell technology expand as much as we have seen EV technology expand in recent years.

  • @ladsongeddings100
    @ladsongeddings100 3 года назад +22

    I've driven an EV for 11 years now and it's great;
    The idea of replacing gasoline with hydrogen was brought forth by the fossil fuel companies as a kind of 'Gasoline 2'; the idea was to continue the current mining, refining(now called reforming for hydrogen)and distribution networks, gas stations. However, it all went south when they finally tried to implement the grand idea because of the enormous technical issues. Technical issues some of which will never be solved without a gross ongoing economic overhead. Nope! hydrogen has a place; but, not in ground transportation; perhaps in commercial aircraft and/or seagoing cargo ships; but not in trains, trucks or automobiles.

    • @ForzaJersey
      @ForzaJersey 2 года назад +4

      Yeah, that's a long debunked conspiracy theory about fossil fuel companies. If BEVs are the future, existing Oil companies will be making most of their money from EV fast charging, industrial chemicals, and biofuels. Oil companies have the best locations for refueling or recharging. They will have MW fast chargers that will allow most EVs to fully recharge in about 5 minutes.
      Until lithium ion batteries became affordable, hydrogen fuel cells seemed like the only realistic way to electrify our transportation system. Unfortunately, hydrogen from water electrolysis is net negative energy and affordable hydrogen is dirty. Batteries are just way more efficient than hydrogen fuel cells even if battery energy density is crap and battery recycling sounds unrealistic considering how lithium ion batteries from our electronics are "recycled" via combustion in Southeast Asia or Africa.

    • @kuei1215
      @kuei1215 2 года назад +1

      You really need to do more research. You sound foolish. Especially since they are currently working on the hydrogen infrastructure for cars. You must work for Tesla. LOL

    • @kuei1215
      @kuei1215 2 года назад +1

      @Alien Guru Yes, you are.

    • @fetB
      @fetB 2 года назад

      @@ForzaJersey I'm confused by your comment. You're aware that on a whole battery is just much better, yet hydrogen is still supported. if not fossile fuel industry, who else is behind it?

    • @mattl6004
      @mattl6004 2 года назад +5

      Hydrogen technology is moving well a pilot scheme in Germany seems to be going well. They tested 2 busses and the system even provides heating to locals. lithium battery HGVs have been made but have low range and wouldn't be suitable for long distance haulage. hydrogen fuel cells provide more energy density. it will certainly have a future for large heavy transport.

  • @mostlynobody517
    @mostlynobody517 2 года назад

    Seriously, good luck , all clean solutions should be on the table.

  • @superspecialty5169
    @superspecialty5169 2 года назад +1

    So what is the update for 2023 since 2014?

  • @stevencorbo1220
    @stevencorbo1220 2 года назад +9

    You don't need a fuel cell to run on hydrogen you can run a gasoline engine on hydrogen if you look up the car that runs on water that car separates out the hydrogen in the oxygen from water and gives great gas mileage and power the things that people Miss from gasoline cars

    • @davidgraham1422
      @davidgraham1422 2 года назад

      Steven, you can actually run 100% on an HHO system in a "gas combustion" engine. It will fire off the check engine light because the O2 sensors do not read and carbon in the exhaust.

    • @jamesvan9335
      @jamesvan9335 2 года назад

      The check engine light coming on is the least of your problems in that scenario. Mess around and get Steven Myers'd, don't drink your cranberry juice, or eat out for that matter.(if you're going to go around pushing water as a replacement gas that is)

    • @davidgraham1422
      @davidgraham1422 2 года назад +2

      Such a nice reply. Point if fact, I and a family played around with HHO cells 12 years ago. Put a couple on our personal vehicles. His was a blazer with a 4.3L. Did some work in Boston on a weekend. Fuel pump went out and couldn't start vehicle. Flipped switch on fuel cell, vehicle started and he drove 140 miles home on just the fuel cell. Used a gallon of water. There quite a few individuals with cars converted to hydrogen for fuel.

    • @리주민
      @리주민 2 года назад

      True, but hydrogen tanks cannot store as long as gas tanks because they leak more. And a larger tank is needed

    • @Alwaysbusy300
      @Alwaysbusy300 2 года назад

      @@davidgraham1422 yes same like separate eletrons of the atomic structure of nitrogen on air and runn on air with out all the things they doing to get energy, why you mix hh+o and get water on the pipe its just because if u extract the nitrogen of the air and separete from the eletrons shell u have protons that it's loose looking to combine with eletrons to go back on nature for of energy water.

  • @Top12Boardsport
    @Top12Boardsport Год назад +1

    Hydrogen is just a way to use power to get power. Could be good in some applications but the best way to use the power that you already have made. You loose power at every conversion.

  • @chriscarlin4907
    @chriscarlin4907 3 года назад +5

    1960s someone created a porous block of material that stored flammable gases with out a pressure vessel...my father in law, a model aircraft manufacturer, saw an article in the model aircraft magazine of that time that displayed the block...the man pouring liquid propane into it then waiting for the air to clear the he played a blow torch on the block that was fueled by a hose from the side of the block!....

    • @linmal2242
      @linmal2242 3 года назад +1

      So, then what? You feed the propane into an ICE engine? And what do you get; bugger-all power and exhaust gases i.e. Co2 + CH4 neither of which do we want more of in the atmosphere ! Anyway, it would just disperse, especially in heat/hot weather !

  • @billcampbell7397
    @billcampbell7397 2 года назад +4

    It is nice to see the Vancouver busses are working so well. Imagine if you will the same busses with the entire roof covered with the latest solar panels. If we use hydrogen to make electricity why not add solar to it as well

    • @petethetaper
      @petethetaper 2 года назад +1

      green roofs are great for everyone under the roof plus all who see benefit also.❤❤☮☮

  • @OneEyeBlinkn
    @OneEyeBlinkn 2 года назад +6

    I would like to see a follow up to this program to this for 2022 to see what has changed in this industry since 2014 and if there is one i will find it ...

    • @davidgraham1422
      @davidgraham1422 2 года назад

      Biggest reason is OBAMA shut down development and production here. It is used world wide. In the 90s cutting edge was coming out of Vancouver. Jeep developed the commander to use a 60kw fuel cell to run 4 rare earth motors. Had to retrofit gas engine back in. Toyota USA also had one back then and advertised it. The PMP fuel cells could use either hydrogen or natural gas to develop infrastructure for hydrogen pumps. Done in Louisiana they had busses using PMP fuel cells. That all stopped when Obama nixed the development.

  • @peterjackson2625
    @peterjackson2625 Год назад +2

    Hydrogen? An alternative nut case idea.

  • @brandonross9827
    @brandonross9827 2 года назад +4

    We use it in HD for our lifts.

  • @reltub20001
    @reltub20001 2 года назад +3

    I have ran my truck on hydrogen and gas together.
    It changed my gas mileage from almost 10 mpg to almost 12 mpg. That doesn't sound like much. I understand that. I will let a mathematician fortune out the percentage of increase.
    Before you do this, be absolutely sure about the safety of using hydrogen and safety of hydrogen itself.
    As a help to anyone wanting to try hydrogen, DO NOT try to compress it and store it. Together with oxygen, hydrogen is explosive. Even if you compress the mixture into an oxygen tank, IT WILL EXPLODE. You have to have a very efficient separator to get the oxygen out of hydrogen. This makes hydrogen flammable, about like gasoline only it has more energy per cubic foot than gasoline.
    Hydrogen burns faster than gasoline. So as you introduce hydrogen and oxygen into any fossil fuel engine, you can feel a tiny amount of power increase. Therefore you must be careful as to how much you add. It can increase engine wear if you don't know what you are doing.
    So be careful out there. Learn about hydrogen safety and apply what you learned.
    Most og you will be okay if you do this.
    I do not recommend this for everyone

    • @davewebster1627
      @davewebster1627 2 года назад

      It's not a fosile fuel engine, it's converted to electric to drive motors

  • @paulsutton5896
    @paulsutton5896 2 года назад +6

    I still think hydrogen is a bugger to store.
    It is easier to store it as ammonium, and process it when you need it.
    A relatively new discovery is to store it as a compound in "hydrides". That looks promising.
    But I don't see hydrogen as a major fuel, until we can store it.

    • @lilmaxAlarcxn
      @lilmaxAlarcxn 2 года назад +2

      we can store it we use these in space..

    • @paulsutton5896
      @paulsutton5896 2 года назад

      @@rltreasure
      See video by Sandy Monro.

    • @psulux
      @psulux 2 года назад

      Store it as water.
      Convert it as you use it.
      Or die in an overheating world.

    • @paulsutton5896
      @paulsutton5896 2 года назад

      @@psulux
      There is no proof that "global warming" is anthropic in origin. There have been warm periods in the past, which preceded our industrial age.
      Hydrogen as a component of water has no energy.
      It is separating the the hydrogen into a substance which wants to recombine with the oxygen, that confers energy upon it.
      This requires at least as much energy as you can get from the hydrogen, as a fuel.
      Storing the hydrogen is effectively storing that energy.
      This is particularly valuable if your energy supply is intermittent.

    • @glenmetal7016
      @glenmetal7016 2 года назад

      @@paulsutton5896 where

  • @tinahottt29
    @tinahottt29 2 года назад +1

    Bị nghiện bài này từ thời Bảo Thy, ko ngờ lại có ngày được nghe idol mới trong lòng mình Đức Phúc cover lại. Cảm ơn em ĐP vì đã cover lại lắng đọng cảm xúc như vậy

  • @gextreme2381
    @gextreme2381 2 года назад +4

    32:06 USING Hydrogen is green. PRODUCING Hydrogen - not so much... same dilemma as the electric vehicle. It's only green if the underlying power used to produce it comes from hydro, solar, wind, etc. I'm not busting on Hydrogen, but looking for someone to help me understand how we can get to the holy grail because that sure would be awesome.

    • @chriskostecki8777
      @chriskostecki8777 2 года назад

      You forgot Geo-Thermal...Just an observation

    • @sheilamclaughlin963
      @sheilamclaughlin963 2 года назад

      12 volt battery and water with a little technology, oil company s don’t want u to know, look it up

    • @terryrose6208
      @terryrose6208 2 года назад

      @@chriskostecki8777 I've thought much about that very idea. I might be wrong, but I believe that it's only truly feasible and practical in countries that have geothermal energy close to the land surface. My daughter has a geothermal heating and cooling system in her home in Florida. It doesn't work well and is prone to breakdowns. But, I wish it did and that every home in every country could use the system. Would be cheaper and a lot less pollution. Just my thoughts.

    • @daveponder2754
      @daveponder2754 2 года назад

      Here is your "help". Go to the library, order online books, use the
      internet, and study the process yourself. You seem to want someone
      else to do your learning for you.

    • @sevencostanza3931
      @sevencostanza3931 2 года назад

      there is no holy grail------everything causes pollution------EV's cause pollution if grid run by coal. Mining of battery materials is very polluting. Hydrogen bad, Batteries Bad.......reality is need to decrease population or decrease materialism by a substantial amount.

  • @StavisBenson-dv2yc
    @StavisBenson-dv2yc 11 месяцев назад +3

    No matter how much energy is used ro produce hydrogen...as long as it provides solutions to the problem of ability to "store" , "transport " and easily "distribute" energy and better still keeps the environment green, Hydrogen is the winner as energy of the future

    • @brucefrykman8295
      @brucefrykman8295 6 месяцев назад +1

      How do you store and transport hydrogen on a continental industrial scale?
      In 2022 the USA consumed 7.5 billion barrels of petroleum, 65% of which is used for transportation needs or roughly 5 billion barrels per year for transportation.
      Each barrel of oil contains about 6 billion joules of energy so we will need 30 billions of billions of joules to supply the current transportation needs of the USA for the current year. This is 30x10^18 joules per year or 30 petajoules (30,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules) to electrify the current US transportation fleet for a year.
      There are 3.6x10^6 (3,600,000 joules of energy in each KwH of electricity so we need 8.3x10^12 (8.300,000,000,000 or 8.3 Trillion) KwH of electricity per year to move ourselves and our stuff around in the USA at 2022 levels. We currently consume over 4.2 trillion Kwh of electricity per year in the USA. To both make our electricity needs and our fuel needs for our cars, trucks, trains, planes, and ships to run on hydrogen we will need to triple this current level to a production rate of 12.5 trillion KwH per year
      (1 Kw = 1.34 hp)
      Tell me how we obtain enough "green" hydrogen to supply the USA with 12.5 trillion KwH
      of energy per year without completely destroying the entire natural ecosphere of the USA?
      238 kJ/mole of H2 or roughly 15,000 moles of H2 per KwH.
      The IPCC theorizes that if the entire Earth's population ceased using all fossil fuels starting tomorrow, the Earth's average atmospheric could be lowered by 0.13 degrees by 2100 but this would take several thousands of years for it to take effect due to the thermal inertia of the oceans that contain hundreds of times the heat content of the atmosphere.
      The entire "green energy" issue is simply a trope for socialist slavery, nothing more.

    • @graham6t1
      @graham6t1 Месяц назад

      96% of all the hydrogen produced worldwide is made from Methane. The process is more polluting than if the Methane was used directly as a fuel

  • @johnhopkins6260
    @johnhopkins6260 2 года назад +2

    Lurking question for a while: With "salt" (sodium Chloride) commonly used as an electrolyte for Hydrolysis, what happens to the Sodium and Chlorine?
    i.e. with common DIY "hydrolyzers", is the O2 produced safe to breathe? (or do you end up with a lung full of Chlorine gas?) the explosive hazards of Hydrogen produced should be obvious for most... particularly when your garage explodes. What other readily available electrolytes can be used? is/are recommended?

    • @bernie7799
      @bernie7799 Год назад

      😊😊😊

    • @newageautotechnology
      @newageautotechnology 9 месяцев назад

      That's because you are using the wrong electrolytes. You need potassium hydroxide. ​@@bernie7799

  • @0ldb1ll
    @0ldb1ll Год назад +1

    The speaker is quite right saying hydrogen is the most abundant element on the planet - but unfortunately another element or two is always attached to it and it takes more energy to split the hydrogen away before it can be used as an energy source.

    • @jeremyriordan5463
      @jeremyriordan5463 8 месяцев назад

      Have you tried refining gasoline from crude oil that you extracted out of a well in the ground and then shipped across the ocean using fossil fuels to power the oil tanker? The oldest, dumbest argument against hydrogen in the book. Classic.

  • @aguerra1381
    @aguerra1381 2 года назад +8

    Hydrogen can also be produced by sending a certain frequency of radio waves through water. John Kanzius proved it.

    • @dongray4064
      @dongray4064 2 года назад +5

      I saw an experiment where sound waves of certain frequencies were used to split water into O2 & H2

    • @mohammadwasilliterate8037
      @mohammadwasilliterate8037 2 года назад

      *We also proved we can get to the moon but we don't use it for everyday travel ya PEANUT.* 🤣

    • @solomon-uu5xh
      @solomon-uu5xh 2 года назад

      There used to be a video of a Dr experimenting with stuff to help his wife's cancer, I think. & he discovered splitting water with a radio or microwave frequency.

    • @aguerra1381
      @aguerra1381 2 года назад +1

      @@solomon-uu5xh
      That was him! John Kanzius.

  • @johnhennery8820
    @johnhennery8820 2 года назад +1

    Use a lazer connected to a water injector to make the hidrogen gas in the cylinder of the engine at the right timming and it eleminates a lot of problems

  • @delaneysatard4762
    @delaneysatard4762 2 года назад +2

    Renewable natural gas is the answer to achieving lowest carbon emissions. If I were to buy a hydrogen fuel cell truck for use in the long haul how will I compete with trucks running on RNG? Hyliions systems can get net zero carbon emissions today and a 1000 mile range, 75 miles fully electric. Hypertruck ERX with RNG is the game changer and the infrastructure is there now.

  • @kennedy67951
    @kennedy67951 2 года назад +2

    What is the (MEMBRAIN) between the Cells called? Also, 'what are the Materials used to make up (HYDROGEN MEMBRAIN)?

    • @mrwess1927
      @mrwess1927 6 месяцев назад

      Membrane. Its called the proton exchange membrane

  • @louisgiokas2206
    @louisgiokas2206 2 года назад

    About 16 years ago I had one of the large construction management and engineering firms working on a project I was developing. The same group was also working on BP hydrogen fueling stations. How many are there out there? The problems with hydrogen fueling infrastructure have not been solved in all that time. Do you think it will be now? Dream on. It reminds me very much of nuclear fusion for energy. This has been going on at least as long as I have been alive (over six decades). Not there yet. Almost. For the last five decades.

    • @louisgiokas2206
      @louisgiokas2206 2 года назад

      @Tom R Probably. The issue is not just fusing atoms, but making the reaction sustainable, as in 7x247365. It has been decades, and solving the engineering problems associated with a power plant is difficult. We will probably get anti-matter power first.

  • @viuvenitlalumina
    @viuvenitlalumina 2 года назад

    where can I buy this?

  • @urgreatestenemy
    @urgreatestenemy 2 года назад +2

    There is a video on RUclips about putting solar panels in the Sahara Desert because they are in the desert they don't have cloud cover and because the amount of time they are in direct sunlight is more than other places on earth they produce a lot more energy.
    The problem was being able to setup a way to run powerlines to major population centers was not cost feasible.
    But what if instead of moving the power across to a populated areas you instead put the electricity into ocean water and produced Hydrogen that you could then put into ships and deliver anywhere in the world.
    This could be the solution for both problems how to create enough clean renewable energy to produce Hydrogen on a large scale and not having to move solar energy across major distances to a population centers.

  • @johngilmour8945
    @johngilmour8945 2 года назад +1

    I would love to have one for my ""MOBILITY SCOOTER""

  • @onedaysoon3
    @onedaysoon3 2 года назад

    I hate it when they call Hydrogen an energy source. It's a battery. Critics complain that we can't store the excess energy from solar or wind to use when we need more, but Hydrogen can be used for this. When they call it an energy source, then they use fossil fuels as the base instead of electric hydrolysis and they march right past the green solution.

  • @TheFlow2006
    @TheFlow2006 2 года назад

    3:10 i am all for hydrogen but please don´t forget to say that the hydrogen we produce today or better most of it is grey hydrogen that is prouced out of natural gas so you still have carbon emmissions.

  • @christopherwest5840
    @christopherwest5840 5 месяцев назад

    Liquid fuels will likely never go away. They are much more idiot proof than pressure fuels. Also they are needed for smaller tools where size and weight are paramount

  • @casinogiant
    @casinogiant 3 месяца назад

    10 years later and the petroleum companies still have a literal choke hold on us.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 2 года назад +2

    Fuel cell technology is a possibility if the solar panels are made without plastic. A natural solar panel can be made from erythrosorbate or metal oxide glass can be a survivable solar panel design.

    • @malcolmjohnston3227
      @malcolmjohnston3227 2 года назад +1

      Plastics 'are forever' like diamonds so encouraging reuse rather than landfill needs to be a priority because plastics are everywhere around the entire planet and it's oceans!

  • @saltzmann1
    @saltzmann1 3 года назад +35

    It takes more power to make Hydrogen than you get out of it. Oil and coal or gas would be used to make Hydrogen and in the end, you still have no gain in power.

    • @boxs
      @boxs 2 года назад +2

      Solar power will change the equation

    • @itsRichymantime
      @itsRichymantime 2 года назад +3

      sounds like some oily business wants to create a new let's go on programme as green...?!!!

    • @kennethhudson8013
      @kennethhudson8013 2 года назад

      @@itsRichymantime yeah, and you environs do very little except launder money and kickbacks in the name of environmentalism, why is plastic, recycling even a issue? If it's unrecylable gassify it! Put it to use!

    • @itsRichymantime
      @itsRichymantime 2 года назад +1

      @@boxs it has to when this system wants to continue .
      don't forget water energy , the waves off the oceans ,see and rivers even rain.
      but the money is stocked in dirty energy so they will with there influence in politics
      do everything to continue there investment. They should be called to hold there horses and reinvesting
      there capital ore pay the damage done from point right NOW !!!

    • @itsRichymantime
      @itsRichymantime 2 года назад +2

      but you still got the pollution.
      too back up your FACTUAL remark.

  • @bobdeverell
    @bobdeverell 2 года назад +1

    Over my life I have worked on many fascinating technologies which came and went: they all met a need. I learnt that because we can do something does not mean we should do it. In the end we must ask is the overall power cycle logical. I changed my mind about hydrogen fuel cells about 5 years ago when the trajectory of battery improvement, and the future potential for primary nuclear battery technology was accelerating. Fuel cells will continue to develop for space and niche markets, but I predict their use will remain limited.

    • @blazetownsend8785
      @blazetownsend8785 2 года назад

      I had the opposite experience. The more I had studied battery tech thinking it was the future, the more I felt like it has a wall that it will hit. The biggest is the materials required and how we would be unable to provide a battery operated car to everyone needing one. On the other side of that, you have hydrogen. You can burn it or battery cell it. It can use technologies from both combustion engines and EV's with very limited engineering to meet the gap. Hydrogen Fuel cells are more efficient than combustion vehicles now even after production and distribution of hydrogen. While hydrogen is not as efficient as a battery operated EV it is more available and the byproduct of hydrogen is water. The only issue with Hydrogen is the lack of infrastructure. EV's piggyback off of the Electric grid so much of what they need is already there. However, there is much more to developing a Hydrogen network which can also piggyback off the grid, but there is storage and delivery and in some cases filtration depending on the source of H2O that they use. Nuclear is quite a ways off just because of restrictions involving it. Nuclear will not likely end up as a domestic fuel source in our lifetimes but would be used to bolster the demands of our domestic energy demands.

    • @bobdeverell
      @bobdeverell 2 года назад +1

      @@blazetownsend8785 Thanks for your considered reply. Your point on material availability can be valid for lithium but not for sodium etc. Storage reversibility is another factor when considering grid efficiency. I notice Tesla is a proponent of domestic storage and now vehicle to grid. This is a potentially important feature that H2 systems do not possess. We may agree to differ.

  • @theephemeralglade1935
    @theephemeralglade1935 3 года назад +30

    Oh, it's Nature's Fuel! Lol. For a second there it almost sounded like it WASN"T ridiculously inefficient to extract from whatever it is attached to. The smart money is on using the electricity you generate to power things directly.

    • @waynethomas1726
      @waynethomas1726 2 года назад +4

      I was just wondering how old this video was and noticed your comment. If this had gained any traction at all we would have heard about it before now. No, like this video, this is just an old wives tale.

    • @mohammadwasilliterate8037
      @mohammadwasilliterate8037 2 года назад

      @@waynethomas1726 There is still some dumbasses throwing money down this hole🤣🤣🤣

    • @QBDLettuce
      @QBDLettuce 2 года назад

      It's almost as difficult as me writing a novel.
      Mind you, I've not even begun to try to write the novel, just like there hasn't been any work towards improving the efficiency.
      But hey, keep living with your head up your ass, I'm sure there's solutions in there. 😉

  • @ranjithamarakoon8842
    @ranjithamarakoon8842 2 года назад +3

    Thank you for your effort to make hydrogen as main fuels.💖💖💖

  • @mark8yes329
    @mark8yes329 2 года назад +5

    The hydrogen systems used on buses don't work properly in the northern US states in the winter. The cold temps prevent the systems from operating well enough to generate enough hydrogen. The Chicago Transat Authority were give a couple of hydrogen buses to try out but it was winter and they took them out of service after a few weeks. They shipped the buses to Toronto with the CTA name still on the buses. Remember that heat is energy and the better fuel is propane because it's 37 percent hydrogen and burns hot and very clean and is 104 octane. Propane is found naturally underground mixed with other games such as butane and methane which is natural gas. Only about 30 percent of propane is sourced by cracking a barrel of oil in the refinery process. LPG propane is the world's most popular alternative fuel for cars and trucks.

    • @TheFlow2006
      @TheFlow2006 2 года назад

      LPG is indeed a very good alternative for cars, but if you want to get carbon neutral you have to use stuff like batteries or hydrogen and by both it depends on how they are produced on how neutral they get

  • @mudman189
    @mudman189 2 года назад +3

    Water vapor is more warm house effect than co2

  • @robertroyles1165
    @robertroyles1165 2 года назад +7

    Great show, enjoyed it very much.

  • @walkabout16
    @walkabout16 2 года назад +2

    A misunderstanding about Hydrogen is that it is thought that less energy is needed to split Atoms and that you get more energy out when you recombine them, not so, there is an overall energy loss in the process, which means it takes more in to get less out.

    • @davidgraham1422
      @davidgraham1422 2 года назад +1

      You are correct but these cells had an efficiency of 96% back in the 90s

  • @bindiberry6280
    @bindiberry6280 Год назад

    Modern technology can be used to farm methane with your kitchen waste in two one cubic meter plastic containers. You can compress those methane fully automated into a light-weight, installable propane tanks for charging your Aptera in the backyard 7/24. If you don't use them to charge your Aptera, you can use them to cook your food or warm your house as well. All kitchen waste will become fertilizers eventually, which you can sell/donate to vertical/roof-top organic farms around metropolitans.

  • @stevenlonien7857
    @stevenlonien7857 2 года назад +1

    Hydrogen is free on mass scale of tides rivers Oceanside handy.

  • @JR-kk6ce
    @JR-kk6ce 2 года назад +3

    Vast quantities of cheap Hydrogen can be generated as a byproduct of cooling nuclear power plants. A nuclear power plant generates enough heat to crack the Oxygen/Hydrogen bond of water.

    • @arturoeugster2377
      @arturoeugster2377 2 года назад

      J R
      Not true! Temperature is not high. Using part of the electric power, yes by hydrolysis using far more energy than later extracted..
      You are confusing hydrogen by large quantities of condensing water as absorbed by air.

  • @keangimawaiotebwa4069
    @keangimawaiotebwa4069 11 месяцев назад +3

    Hydrogen as the fuel source for any vehicles will help to maintain an excellent quality of our environment and keeps the good quality of things for future generation to come.

    • @darrenwebb5334
      @darrenwebb5334 Месяц назад +1

      Tell us you know nothing about hydrogen without saying it.

  • @tomjohn8733
    @tomjohn8733 2 года назад +1

    Interesting, Very nice, Next the people will be replaced by robotics in all warehouse’s, no doubt, different problems will require different solutions depending on situation, a big plus is you dent require rare metals…

  • @davidkeenan5642
    @davidkeenan5642 2 года назад +4

    Hydrogen has a place in a fossil fuel free future. But only as an energy storage device with limited applications. It will never be better for personal transport than BEVs. BEVs are just more convenient. And personally I think that electric hybrids have a limited future.
    Battery technology has improved and is improving. But there's a great improvement on the horizon, solid state batteries. When/if they become commercial, current batteries will become as old a technology as ICEs are today. But I think we're still at least 10 years away from that happening. Time enough for Tesla with its gigafactories, and China with its giga-economy, to grab a substantial lead.
    Meanwhile, HFCVs will continue to sell in small, or relatively small numbers because nobody outside of the Japanese and Californian governments are investing the building the "absolutely" required refuelling infrastructure for HFCVs to sell in their millions.
    And therein lies the absolutely "key" difference between BEVs and HCEVs. The ability to commercially expand. HCEVs will always require their fuel to be produced and distributed centrally. BEVs just need their customers to be connected to an existing electrical grid.
    Supermarkets are already accepting that they need to provide a few EV recharging points in their car parks. It's a selling point for them. "Come to us, park and plug in, do your shopping, relax." Range anxiety is no problem for these people, and as the number of charging points increases, which it will, it will become a no problem for a vastly increased number of people.
    Expanding the number and efficiency of EV charging points will be vastly less expensive than building a HFCEV refuelling infrastructure. Which at the end of the day would just be replacing our current petrol and diesel refuelling stations!

    • @solexxx8588
      @solexxx8588 2 года назад

      Agree. Battery EVs are the solution to climate change. Hydrogen is not energy dense enough. A fuel cell car is 80K$ more expensive and there is no infrastructure.

    • @davidkeenan5642
      @davidkeenan5642 2 года назад +1

      @@solexxx8588
      We're in accord, but BEVs are just one piece (an important piece) of arresting human emissions of GHGs, they are not "the solution to climate change", they're part of the solution. And then only if the electricity is generated cleanly.
      Nations first need to stop burning coal. The UK is a leader in this respect, but the UK, and most other nations, are never going to invest in hydrogen refuelling stations, the cost is prohibitive in comparison to subsidising an EV recharging infrastructure.

  • @blam1328
    @blam1328 2 года назад +4

    Now, seven years later, hydrogen seems going nowhere.

    • @kuei1215
      @kuei1215 2 года назад +3

      LOL. Half the world's car manufacturers are developing hydrogen cars. Airbus is developing an A380 that runs on hydrogen. Trains and buses are running on hydrogen. It is you that is going nowhere.

    • @blam1328
      @blam1328 2 года назад +1

      @@kuei1215 I don't think those car manufacturers, especially Toyota, are laughing.

    • @sevencostanza3931
      @sevencostanza3931 2 года назад

      @@blam1328 many more but do not have time to list

    • @MrEuroWolfie
      @MrEuroWolfie 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@blam1328do you watch a lot of Beavis and Butthead show also?

  • @louismorejohn586
    @louismorejohn586 2 года назад +1

    Photons: Nature's Better Fuel!

  • @antonisautos8704
    @antonisautos8704 2 года назад

    8 years past and buying a hydrogen car isn't mainstream at least near where I live. Although I wouldn't mind it. I heard about the progress made in California where there were H2 cars sold and driven by real people.
    Maybe one day.
    Can't get electric cars around here, not because of lack of wanting them, it's because of lack of supply.

  • @Warren5331
    @Warren5331 2 года назад

    How did you make your hydrogen?

  • @johnfox6025
    @johnfox6025 Год назад

    My question is can we catch the water generated from the hydrogen burn and make more hydrogen from it?

  • @royrice8021
    @royrice8021 Год назад +1

    Hydrogen is NOT cost effective. The carbon footprint is not acceptable. NEXT…………

  • @chilled99
    @chilled99 2 года назад

    What about Thorium reactors?

  • @georgeflitzer7160
    @georgeflitzer7160 2 года назад

    Everyone needs this especially w the fuel crisis of today.

    • @lucianonotte1444
      @lucianonotte1444 2 года назад

      With today's technology we can burn garbage and create electricity using scrubbers and filters and the smoke that comes out of the incinerators is clean and safe check out peel recovery where they burn garbage?

  • @woodymonte
    @woodymonte 2 года назад +1

    Carbon is natures fuel!

  • @stevewilkins5004
    @stevewilkins5004 2 года назад

    I've been saying this for years. Converting vehicles to Hydrogen gas. Creating the gas from water using Solar home powered electrolysis. 8 hrs can fill 2 S/S tanks @ 1500psi = 600km from 2 liter engine vehicle (375mls) VIRTUALLY FREE! (price of the water - damn site cheaper than gas!) Burns clean - no fuel cell required!! Only inconvenience have to refuel at home - long trips extra tanks. Or take solar electrolysis system with off-grid trips.

  • @kennethhudson8013
    @kennethhudson8013 2 года назад +1

    Plasma gasification is a win win tech. You can get syngas, syndiesel, burn biohazrds, unrecylable plastic, almost anything with very few pollution

  • @roberttaylor2016
    @roberttaylor2016 2 года назад +1

    Electricity is required to charge batteries . At present the amount of electricity required to charge batteries can not keep up to the expected number of vehicles that will be on the road . Hydrogen is a better source of power .
    Time will tell .

    • @westwonic
      @westwonic 2 года назад

      New battery technology has just arrived; diamond nuclear batteries that will provide continuous power without degredation.

  • @GEOsustainable
    @GEOsustainable 2 года назад

    Let's not talk about how if we used hydrogen in large formats such as automobiles, the earth would be constantly raining, new rivers would form in city streets. Average humidity (talk about it getting hard to breathe) would get to 75% and above. The air would literally drip. Other than that, let's go hydrogen because we can never make the right choice for our cars. Here's the second shoe, do you know how much energy it takes to make Hydrogen? We spend more energy making it than it gives us.

  • @shankerchennapareddy5629
    @shankerchennapareddy5629 2 года назад

    This information is exciting. But need to about the risks uncovered

  • @michaelboyce3871
    @michaelboyce3871 2 года назад +3

    It just proves how much power and control big oil has

  • @patrickkerner1471
    @patrickkerner1471 2 года назад

    The Real New Next Auto, Hydrogen!

  • @geoffdein2894
    @geoffdein2894 2 года назад +6

    It’s a bit like carbon dioxide. Great for plants and more rapid growing in greenhouses. It’s abundant. It’s free. It’s totally natural

    • @DavidPimentel
      @DavidPimentel 2 года назад

      Hydrogen is NOT free. It costs a lot (of energy) to dissociate it.

    • @cpcattin
      @cpcattin 2 года назад

      Oil is 100% natural

    • @daveponder2754
      @daveponder2754 2 года назад

      Yeah right MORON

  • @MrWarrenwest
    @MrWarrenwest 2 года назад

    can h be made from solar roof panels?

    • @chrismuir8403
      @chrismuir8403 2 года назад +1

      Not directly. But it could power an electrolyzer, compressor (for storage) and fuel cell to get electricity back - with an overall efficiency of about 27%. Or you could store that power in batteries at 85% efficiency, or use the electricity directly. Doesn't make sense to use the less efficient method of energy storage.

  • @hardrockuk_com
    @hardrockuk_com 2 года назад

    You are correct. But ! For larger vehicles, that run for hours. Like a range extenders.
    Trucks, Trucks refrigerators, tractors, many farm combine harvesters, ships, large boats , many vans
    All need electrical power. You don't want to run out of electric in a ship.
    Also you can use as generator s to recharge say 10 cars 🚗 at a super charger stations.
    Delivery of liquid hydrogen to regular placed generators.
    The sun goes down at night.
    The wind is not reliable.
    Cars is stupid I agree 👍
    Bikes.

  • @josephstubbs5628
    @josephstubbs5628 2 года назад

    Being on the cusp of a radical improvement like lith-ion to graphene batteries brings with it an obvious problem from the short term consumer perspective relating to electric vehicles. Why buy the old technology today when the new technology is just around the corner? It is hard to imagine that the problem of 'immediate obsolescence' will not create an enormous and legitimate disincentive to switch now. It seems the smart thing to do would be to wait ten years. But how does that notion interface with our dire climate change timeline? It would be very useful to know what the exact points of obsolescence would be. Could current charging stations be used with the new technology, for example? Could your 'old' EV battery be replaced with a 'new' graphene one without replacing the entire vehicle? Bringing such answers to common knowledge does seem as important as it could be, and therefore pressure against these questions being premature seems appropriate.

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 2 года назад +3

    Australia gets hydrogen from wells as helium is found. South Australia and some is known elsewhere.

    • @currencyjon01
      @currencyjon01 2 года назад

      Thanks. I didn't know that and I live in SA I will look into it just for my own knowledge. cheers

  • @ChristianAffirmation
    @ChristianAffirmation 2 года назад

    What solutions do we have today? If we started a crowd funding project today what would we do?

  • @spagsketti
    @spagsketti 2 года назад +2

    So I worked for Airgas for a bit when I was young. I filled liquid Nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, propane and Co2 so I got a little insight on compressed and liquid gas. Hydrogen is not safe, it is highly flammable and can self ignite at 6psi or more just from the static electricity produced from the friction of it coming out of wherever it is leaking or draining. During the day if it is burning you will have a hard time seeing it as it burns white hot. A guy walking past a tank on the loading dock that was leaking self ignited creating a fire bubble around the tank burning him on the face and arms. So saying it is safe is an out right lie. Is it safer than gasoline?? I would say yes, It is self contained in a high pressure tank that is around 3000psi in a gas state and that is better than a open tank with fumes leaking out as you fill it. I never saw a liquid Hydrogen tank so I cannot say anything about that.

    • @rogerhickson7256
      @rogerhickson7256 2 года назад

      Hydrogen is all about keeping control of energy rather than allowing people a cheap energy source. It requires proper storage and transfer as it is so volatile. Not something the average homeowner can do much about .
      Oil has been blacklisted so the world's poor can't pull themselves out of poverty using such a cheap energy source. It has nothing whatsoever to do with climate...just another lie by the Global rich to keep us under their thumbs

    • @spagsketti
      @spagsketti 2 года назад +2

      @@rogerhickson7256 Yes but the lady a the beginning of the video said it was safe. It is not safe it is very very flammable and extreme caution needs to be in place to be sure that it is not going to explode. A high pressure Hydrogen tank is a torpedo if the valve is sheared off. When I worked for Airgas I broke my foot and was on light duty. I had to remove valves out of the cylinders and send them off to be tested. After a couple days I asked one of the guy who had worked in that building for many years how all the holds in the brick wall happened right behind this valve removal tool that had a counter balanced cable holding a round pole that had a removable socket that fit each tank depending on what gas was in it. He said, The holes were from someone who failed to release the over 3000psi gas in the tank and the valve now released blew through the brick wall leaving a hole in the wall. The building was over 90 years old and there was over 20 holes in that wall. A 3000psi plus cylinder with a sheared off valve has a exit hole now smaller than the size of a soft drink straw. This will blow through a house if not tied down. The sound would blow out unprotected eardrum's and if flammable like Hydrogen would ignite just from friction of it's exit.

  • @markcampbell7577
    @markcampbell7577 2 года назад +1

    Edison generators and dynamos with inverters and transformers can deliver any amount of current and voltage AC power continuous peak power without fuel wind or water. Conservation of water can be enhanced with Edison generators and dynamos power plants. Hydroelectric power plants can be reduced or eliminated with Edison power plants.

  • @lorettacaputo6997
    @lorettacaputo6997 2 года назад

    The begining of this video reminds me so much of the proclaimations of nuclear power made in the 50's.

  • @Jason-de9mq
    @Jason-de9mq 2 года назад

    How can you take out hydrogen and have hydrogen as part of you byproduct?

  • @KMF3
    @KMF3 2 года назад

    I don't understand why we're not using these

  • @johnwickham9805
    @johnwickham9805 2 года назад

    But does it not explode easily

  • @dannypope1860
    @dannypope1860 2 года назад +2

    Creating hydrogen takes a lot of energy. You’d still be burning coal in a power plant to generate the electricity needed to put hydrogen in cars.
    Hydrogen is basically energy storage. It’s just a different kind of battery.

    • @tuck1726
      @tuck1726 2 года назад

      Nuclear

    • @tuck1726
      @tuck1726 2 года назад

      But you can’t put nuclear in a car

    • @sheilamclaughlin963
      @sheilamclaughlin963 2 года назад

      12 volt battery will break water into pure fuel and when it burns it will turn back into water

    • @sheilamclaughlin963
      @sheilamclaughlin963 2 года назад

      @@tuck1726 I’d bet u could if they wanted, fear factor

    • @SuperBootyBay
      @SuperBootyBay 2 года назад

      would be better off creating generation sub stations powered on solar and wind i.e at or near current petrol stations. Meaning a localised source only produced when needed and excess renewables if any can go back to the grid or power the store.

  • @melvynasplett3399
    @melvynasplett3399 2 года назад

    Hydrogen is used in our bodies carried in for fuel by the sugar and fat molecules and then when it spent the air we breath out carries it out by carbon dioxide

  • @grammybeth2685
    @grammybeth2685 2 года назад

    With a green way of getting hydrogen you get water and we need water.

  • @stevegroen1116
    @stevegroen1116 2 года назад +7

    Need to produce Hydrogen where they already have excess power. Hydro plants, Wind, Solar and Burned off unused natural gas.

    • @Justfactsi812
      @Justfactsi812 2 года назад

      @Tom R This is obviously a Coal funded video judging from the stupid 🙄 unsupportable 🤣 statements to make a B.S. point.

    • @bradleejones9959
      @bradleejones9959 2 года назад

      It's all Propaganda. Even this!
      The Demshits use the fake narrative of Man Made Climate Change when they know it's not true. If it were true, they'd be embracing Dennis Lee's invention. It's a solar powered system that works 24/7 anywhere in the world, hot or cold. And it's been in production for a while now, so it's not like they don't know about it. Go see for yourself.
      Another well documented invention is Troy Reed's self-running motor. From a 10 foot tall machine to one scaled down to fit in a car. "We want to be into production within a year." How naive Troy was. I've tried to find out what happened to him, but there's nothing. He was most likely bought out by a huge organization like the Saudi's for an ungodly amount of money to keep the status quo.
      Those two inventions would eliminate the need for any other energy sources and would be the greenest products on the market.
      You are being lied to by Elitist from around the world.

    • @리주민
      @리주민 2 года назад

      Water electrolysis (WE). And this could be installed in cars too so the fuel cell and WE feed each other for a bit longer, increasing range of the vehicle. 700 miles, for example.

  • @fernandocortes1187
    @fernandocortes1187 2 года назад

    16:00 produciran hidrógeno sobre demanda para vehículos sin tener que tener depósito como en las gasolinerías 16:25 ¿por eso no quieren que el usuario tenga la capacidad de producirlo bajo demanda por simismo ya que se les acabaría el negocio. Asi podrían poner los expendedores en cada gasolineria existente en el mundo

  • @davevuong1074
    @davevuong1074 2 года назад

    How many maps to breaks the H²o to get Hydogene

    • @davevuong1074
      @davevuong1074 2 года назад

      How many amps to breaks the H²O to get Hydrogene?

  • @zelectron1
    @zelectron1 2 года назад +2

    hydrogen leaks are dangerous for the ozone layer , les fuites d'hydrogène sont dangereuses pour la couche d'ozone !

    • @bpeter4397
      @bpeter4397 2 года назад

      wrong

    • @zelectron1
      @zelectron1 2 года назад

      @@bpeter4397 you are PhD in chemistry ?

  • @adrianduncan9735
    @adrianduncan9735 2 года назад

    Awesome!

  • @aguerra1381
    @aguerra1381 2 года назад +4

    What about Stanley Meyer's on-board electrolysis system, the one that cost him his life. Why not revisit that concept. It seems to be a LOT simpler !

    • @chrismuir8403
      @chrismuir8403 2 года назад

      Stanley Meyer was a convicted fraudster, he sold "dealerships" for his supposed hydrogen cell - but never delivered the goods. That's because his so-called "water car" was actually powered by a hidden fuel tank, not the little electrolyzer merrily bubbling away. If he had actually delivered any, it would have quickly become obvious that it didn't actually work the way he claimed. So, instead he gave endless excuses of non-delivery, until his victims finally hauled him into court.

    • @aguerra1381
      @aguerra1381 2 года назад

      @@chrismuir8403
      Troy Reed, Daniel Dingel, Denny Kline, John Kanzius, Arturo Estevez and others in the Philippines, Colombia and Japan that came upon the same concept and swore by it, all of them frauds?
      I've watched plenty of videos by and about Mr. Meyer and he certainly never appeared to be a fraud to me. On the contrary, a man of principles and integrity.
      I respect your opinion but my perception on this whole issue is very different. Even NASA made a big deal about finding water in Mars. Why? So they could extract from it the hydrogen for fuel to get back to earth!
      This concept,(and that of magnetic repulsion) if put into practice, would absolutely destroy the strongholds of Big Oil upon our world and also the electric car and all it's needless and incredibly expensive infrastructures. It would be way too menacing to the existance of too many BIG $ interests in this planet that's why these people are discredited, silenced, jailed, poisoned or simply made to disappear.

    • @billbarney4937
      @billbarney4937 2 года назад +1

      absolutely water can be used as fuel. i see it happening but who knows when. diy for now

    • @arturoeugster2377
      @arturoeugster2377 2 года назад

      Arturo,
      Como funciona ese systema, de donde viene la corriente.

    • @aguerra1381
      @aguerra1381 2 года назад

      @@arturoeugster2377
      Los vídeos del señor Meyer lo explican mucho más claro que lo que yo pudiese.

  • @BourdagePearlsChicago
    @BourdagePearlsChicago 2 года назад

    Salt is abundant and could be answer to energy?

  • @robertfoertsch
    @robertfoertsch 2 года назад +1

    Amazing Technology, Deployed Worldwide Through My Deep Learning AI Research Library SilentWeaponsForQuietWars Thank You

  • @dennishish8467
    @dennishish8467 2 года назад

    It takes ~40% more energy to produce hydrogen than you get out. How efficient is that?

    • @danielraymadden
      @danielraymadden 2 года назад

      YOU DONT KNOW HOW MUCH ENERGY AND COST DRILLING CRUDE OIL EXTRACTING THE HYDROGEN CARBON GAS FROM CRUDE OIL...WHEN YOU ONLY NEED TO EXTRACT HYDROGEN FROM OCEAN WATER...STOP LISTENING TO LIES LOOK AT ALL THE FILTHY REFINERIES HOW COSTLY IS THAT...I CAN PEODUCE HYDROGEN ON DEMAND WITH A CAR BATTERY CHARGED BY A SOLAR PANEL...STOP DRINKING THE DEVILS VOMIT OF LIES...ALL CARS RUN ON HYDROGEN THEY DO NOT NEED DIRTY HYDROCARBON IT IS DIRTY HYDROGEN...

    • @reltub20001
      @reltub20001 2 года назад

      Obviously, you are listening to people that either don't know or don't want you to know.
      I can, have and run my truck with hydrogen. Now it isn't all hydrogen. I add hydrogen with a hydrogen generator I built. I use the battery and charging system in my truck to electrically extract HHO. I pick up almost 2 miles per gallon using this method and have done so for a couple of years.
      They don't want us experimenting with HHO because our economy is based on energy.
      Dont believe me about the economy being based on energy? (Oil especially) check yourself on the price of fuel and the price of everything.

  • @frants48
    @frants48 2 года назад +2

    It's a myth. Too good to be true. It's nice in theory, but, uneconomical in practice.

  • @ceesdevrieze
    @ceesdevrieze 3 года назад +4

    Fantastic story changed my view on hydrogen use for cars etc.

  • @joearcher8771
    @joearcher8771 3 года назад +7

    I would like to partner with EERC to perform a proof of concept experiment to produce a hydrogen chain molecule, leading to room temperature liquid hydrogen with three times the energy density of gasoline.

    • @harrickvharrick3957
      @harrickvharrick3957 2 года назад

      That would be something!!

    • @ForzaJersey
      @ForzaJersey 2 года назад

      No, that won't work lol

    • @chrismuir8403
      @chrismuir8403 2 года назад

      Hydrogen by itself cannot form "chain molecules" but if a carbon backbone is used it becomes easy, the carbon forms the chain, and hydrogen attaches to the carbon. That's what hydrocarbons are, including gasoline.

  • @circusboy90210
    @circusboy90210 2 года назад

    just using the natural gas directly would be far more efficient and green.

  • @Audikontroller1
    @Audikontroller1 2 года назад

    In the end of this video they talk about Iceland, they ruled it too dangerous to continue.
    Now EV's are pushed out like a savior of everything.

  • @chrismuir8403
    @chrismuir8403 2 года назад +1

    Being pushed by the oil and coal companies, as they want to sell that pricy new fuel when their traditional markets decline. Problem is, hydrogen is an expensive, difficult to store fuel, so it simply can't compete with the much more efficient and economical battery electric alternative.

    • @dave8599
      @dave8599 2 года назад

      Yet our leaders keep pushing this non viable Hydrogen energy source. those same leaders meanwhile do all they can to restrict oil production, hence we have joe bidens crazy high gasoline energy prices.