Professor Brian Cox Speaker | Unravelling the Universe | Contact Agent
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 мар 2024
- 🔸 How To Hire Brian Cox as a Keynote Speaker
Please contact an agent at Champions Speakers for an official quote for your company event.
champions-speakers.co.uk/spea...
Do not miss this new and exciting keynote speech from Professor Brian Cox, leading Physicist and expert on the Universe and space. Brian conducts an interesting and insightful speech discussing all things science, space and the physics behind it in a unique way that allows people of all levels to gauge an excellent understanding. Watch this video to find out more!
Subscribe to our RUclips channel to see our latest keynote speeches from top speakers, like Brian Cox!
🟠 SOCIAL LINKS 🟠
SUBSCRIBE to our RUclips Channel:
/ @championsspeakers
Follow us on Twitter!
/ champspeakers
Follow us on Instagram!
/ championsspeakers
🔸 Who is Brian Cox?
Famed physicist, Brian Cox, is the face of British science and broadcasting. He has presented several influential television programmes, educating and informing audiences of all ages. A hit with younger viewers, who gravitate toward Brian's eloquence and infectious passion for science, he is commonly booked to speak at schools. Embodying the wonders of discovery, Brian's onstage presence commands the stage, using his incredibly visual presentations to keep audiences hooked on every fact and theory. When booked for events, Brian reinvents that same magic on your stage, leaving your audience awe-inspired.
Brian is arguably best known for his programmes, which have become a staple of British television. Starting in 2005 on Horizon, he created the series Wonders of the Solar System, Wonders of the Universe and Wonders of Life, which exploded in popularity during the 2010's. Brian's programmes bridge the gap between science and the general public, increasing the accessibility of formerly complex topics, like physics and biology. His speeches follow a similar ideology, as Brian endeavours to inspire, rather than lecture, audiences through highly interesting anecdotes and facts.
Titled Science Britannica, Brian's BBC documentary further expands the reach of British scientific discoveries. In the show, he explores the contribution of scientists over the last 350 years, specifically the public's perception. In 2011, Brian presented Stargazing Live, an onstage exploration of the universe. It was co-presented by Dara Ó Briain, and featured celebrity guests who added a touch of glamour to the event. Brian is a regular TED Talk presenter, where he invites audiences to explore the universe's greatest discoveries, including the Large Hadron Collider.
Brian has provided an expert opinion on several modern current events, shining a factual, unbiased light through the fog of confusion. In recent years, he has vocally warned of the climate danger present on earth, inspiring many people to improve their lifestyle. In 2010, Brian was awarded the Institute of Physics Kelvin Medal and Prize, in celebration of his scientific programmes for the general public. He was later appointed OBE, followed by Best Presenter from the Royal Television Society. An event featuring Brian benefits from an award-winning, pioneering presenter, who is as entertaining as he is knowledgeable.
🔸 Who are Champions Speakers?
We are an industry-leading speaker bureau serving international clients in 66 countries worldwide. 18 years' experience has put us at the forefront of the marketplace, where we specialise in the supply of distinguished speakers.
Our RUclips channel is a hub of exciting interviews and exclusive footage of celebrities, sportspeople business leaders, public speakers and more.
We have worked with figures ranging from Dr Alex George, the UK's Youth Mental Health Ambassador, to Michelle Visage, the globally adored presenter - subscribe to our channel and stay up to date and see our latest videos!
#briancox #professorbriancox #space #universe #blackhole #milkyway #galaxies #championsspeakers 
Наука
A moving clock shows that time slows down. So if that clock was moving fast enough then time would possibly or eventually stop. In that place of no time, we would have the realm, or dimension of infinity, no beginning and no end. Thats a bit of a mind blowing thought. No time means no beginning and no end. ummm interesting :)
That's almost as long as my mortgage repayments
Time is evidentially abstract. You can't 'slow down' an abstract.
@@rhcpmorley if it's abstract, how does gps systems work?
How many solar systems can we physically look at? Rings systems, EMFSYSTEMS. We'll get there eventually. There is no other choice as far as I can tell. If we want to travel in the infinite ♾️ vacuum space. Peace ✌️ 😎. Great talk, Brian is great at what he does, and we're lucky he shares with all of us.
Absolutely 💯
Technically there’s only one solar system
Amazing!
Amazing - thank you.
Here's the quote from Brief History of Time that you should focus on, it is on page one '...Time, whatever that is...' Hawkin admits to not knowing what Time actually is. How do you build hypothesis on such dodgy foundations?
The word Time and the word Space are both homonyms i.e. they both have more than one core meaning. If you can't /don't describe the different meanings, you literally don't know what you are talking about.
Space references spatial position (hence xyz-axis), Time references change (and change is reference frame e.g. quantum specific). Hence Spacetime references changing spatial position aka (relative) motion.
You think Time and Space are fundamental. They are not. Spatial position refers existence, mass, and change refers energy differential. Energy differential is fundamentally what 'is' everything.
You're welcome.
thanks
Consciousness is not emergent, it’s transcendent.
Please explain.
Consciousness is emergent...and after it has emerged transcendence follows...
There can be no beginning without consciousness.
The argument of the ping pong ball bouncing on the table in a moving train doesn’t seem to me to demolish the concept of absolute space. This is because it’s merely a demonstration of how things are perceived differently by observers in different positions, simply as a function of their different perspectives. Their different viewpoints in no way invalidate the physical reality that the larger perspective trumps the smaller and the smaller perspective only works within the context of the larger.
To suggest that the phenomenon that is merely a function of the limited perspective of observers in different viewpoints somehow changes the physical nature of space is a confusion of categories. One is about perception, while the other is about the actual shape of the physical universe regardless of how it’s observed.
Thank you. Question: Why is the universe shown always as unidirectional after the " Big Bang", instead as omni directional?
Well to make it look omnidirectional you will have to be placed at the centre of the model which shows you a panoramic omnidirectional perspective.....but everybody else will not be at your vantage point to see the omnidirectionality which presents itself relative to your position...therefore,for the presenter to give/present everybody watching the presentation an omnidirectional view,he would have to provide each viewer with his own unique omnidirectional view relative to each one's relative perspective and position...which is impossible for him to do,due to the very nature of the concept and meaning of relativity......
@@gerhardusvanderpoll Thanks, that makes sense.
💜
46:47
remove add baner pls
Gravitron - Inflatron - Quotewatron !
Keep smiling Brian 😁👍
Approx 36:20 the Cambridge analysis, that cliche again Subjective & Relative, relating to the famous boat race, those winning ladies had nice shaped legs and thighs in boots, is this true or false.
Streamline curriculum to come that quickly gets youth syntax is revolutionary. The moment the light came on ( x ,y ,z manmade time hierarchy knowledge of Good and evil equations the soul agent machinest was born ,cut the branche lathes the bark milled the edges and grinded the tip of the spear.
We are returning to this in many ways.
The ability to have universal operating systems where each individual can put a scientific box around any element or system with a tool bar of all known physics, maths,models, phylosphical process to Simulate elements under any critical extreme state or environmental condition creates great power individually .
As if the power of mutual destruction at the state levels moves into your neighbors.
The Amish bailed at the point no return on this great 2024 year experiment & quest where we knew something about what was possible to improving human condition.
Whatever nature permits and streamlining efficiency marks this 3rd great enlightenment and computational infrastructure paradigm
Love your work Professor Brian, but Wheeler's One Electron Theory Wave-packaging is exactly what Feynman's Diagrams are in vertically integrated differentiates of temporal superposition thermodynamical relative-timing ratio-rates, vertices at Singularity-point holes in vortices nodal-vibrational holography-quantization.
QM-TIME superposition identification of Electron-photon-phonon-Proton oscillation in Neutronic units of e-Pi-i omnidirectional-dimensional logarithmic condensation modulation, is self-defining explanation of what you see, "everything is connected Wave-packaging floating in Absolute zero-infinity Entanglement Aether Actuality.
The "Hard" Mind-Body Problem is one resonance re-cognition of self in Self, a Timey-Wimey, superimposed line-of-sight image of Bose-Einsteinian Condensation, Hydrogen Atomic Structure Vortex.
If it's fun to imagine why it's always all-at-once sync-duration holography dimensionality, only images of pulse-evolution coherence-cohesion objectives floating in flat-space, Singularity-point Lensing of Superspin orientation by i-reflection potential positioning possibilities, complex bio-logical re-evolution containment in No-thing.
Simple to observe, not even slightly easy to analyze, which is why Math-Physics is the business.
Meanwhile garbage content gets hundreds of millions of views, so sad...
We have to many things confused as life. At the very foundational ordering curriculum it looks good on paper but fails in practice as even experts can talk past one another over the slightest variations.
Nature can never be the ultimate arbitor of truth, we can't blame evil on nature. This falls upon mankind.
Physical lines of measure has miss lead many into uncertainty and mystification throughout history and caused great harm in the world despite its countless benefits and values.
As we witness elements in process that shouldn't be there in space based on or current understanding of process & how our old ordering and categorizing model guides us we must assume nature allows for exotic materials we don't really know about.
That subjective properties are very active and its not idealism nor physicalism. That hamiltonian oscillating waves correlated with idealized time is very sensible orientation and direction that is not physicalism like or it not .
That said our machinized industrialized foundation is successfully built we liberated all common sense marginalized groups leaving only criminals and extremist we better focus on objectivism and defensive countermeasures altering our top down physicalism messy old world Deterministic colonization beliefs and treat it as subject to change without further notice just like any other idealistic or subjective systems could.
We can not continue on this path of offensive military stealth and or trying to postpone access to technology today when you know it will be there tomorrow as this simply puts us all in danger.
We must assume everyone can develop nuclear & bio weapons .
That your neighbors can hold sway over the entire world like any lottery ticket.
This is a new paradigm computational infrastructure that is humans maximum dreams.
We must assume infrastructure where our neighbors and ourselves are strongly bonded in objectivism and countermeasure defensive posterity is our emphasis.
We can't hold back access to technology today that will be there in the hands of people tomorrow.
The hands of a few and even statism itself becomes threatening ans dangerous if nature permits it.
I suspect that you might be suffering from schizophrenia....maybe you should have yourself checked out...
Go ahead and Google yourself how long one light year is.
10*10^15 or something like that. Why? What was the point of that comment?
Brian, you look cool, but many ideas you spit out simply to prolong the so-called scientists' free meals.
All in this magnificent world is not created in one day. It's so much so magnificent that it would take a long time to develop and be good.
You and I here just to admire and witness...this creation, nothing more.
Huh????
Gibberish.
Gamer if materialism is All there is to "admire", then I will ask you a few questions.
What is the source of human Consciousness?
What brain Neuron decides what is Truth or not true?
What biological Gene gives birth to morality?
I’m not saying we know all the answers, but your “creator” theory is not the answer (I think)
What we can’t grasp is the fact that we are nothing special, we are a product of randomness, and we have no purpose in the bigger scale of things. That’s the sad part, and probably much closer to the truth than any God theory out there
@@snakerman2612 you mentioned we humans are a product of randomness. Therefore, you probably subscribe to the hypothesis Abiogenesis.
The science Fiction Abiogenesis has Not been proven. Because Life is Not inherent in mechanistic atoms.
Within the evolutionary timeline, secular scientists do Not know HOW Life was introduced into the pool of lifeless molecules.
The Limitations of Materialism.
Why is Brian lying. The Earth is about 6000 years old. Please stop the lie
And its flat 😅
Something very creepy about this guy.
I don't believe a word that comes out his mouth
Shame, says a lot about you. Brian Cox is one of the few people who can explain a complex subject in layman language
Thanks for your highly educated opinion. Pardon me if I believe Cox and dismiss you…
He said 'the' many, many times. Do you not believe it?
@@johncronin7875Cox reads Feynman poem about atoms with consciousness.
However, materialistic neurologists do Not know the source of human Consciousness.
@@user-iz6de8oj3xhowever, Cox like secular scientists do Not know the source of Life - living organisms.
A subject to "complex" being life is Not inherent in mechanistic atoms.