Transformation matrix with respect to a basis | Linear Algebra | Khan Academy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
    Finding the transformation matrix with respect to a non-standard basis
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson?
    www.khanacadem...
    Linear Algebra on Khan Academy: Have you ever wondered what the difference is between speed and velocity? Ever try to visualize in four dimensions or six or seven? Linear algebra describes things in two dimensions, but many of the concepts can be extended into three, four or more. Linear algebra implies two dimensional reasoning, however, the concepts covered in linear algebra provide the basis for multi-dimensional representations of mathematical reasoning. Matrices, vectors, vector spaces, transformations, eigenvectors/values all help us to visualize and understand multi dimensional concepts. This is an advanced course normally taken by science or engineering majors after taking at least two semesters of calculus (although calculus really isn't a prereq) so don't confuse this with regular high school algebra.
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy’s Linear Algebra channel: / channel
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy: www.youtube.co...

Комментарии • 84

  • @marcushines4172
    @marcushines4172 8 лет назад +141

    We need examples bro...

  • @RealMcDudu
    @RealMcDudu 5 лет назад +17

    Excellent video. In short - to apply a transformation on a non-standard basis, you first move to the standard basis (C), then do the transformation (A), then move again to the non-standard basis (C-1).

    • @ayan8233
      @ayan8233 11 месяцев назад

      Perfectly summed up! Thank you so much for this comment, going straight to my notes!

  • @Ch17638
    @Ch17638 8 лет назад +127

    Thanks, but I would really start with an example and show how the idea fits before explaining the theory behind it , I lost it about half way through this video

    • @Rjsipad
      @Rjsipad 6 лет назад +1

      its not a waste of time, if you already have some idea behind it this video is incredibly helpful, because it helps you gain an understanding of what the numbers all mean. Just be patient, it'll come to you

  • @amberegbert
    @amberegbert 14 лет назад +15

    I can't describe how awesomely helpful these videos are. A great supplement to taking a class, or reading a book on your own. I couldn't have made it through without your help on these. You rock!

  • @sungboklee6790
    @sungboklee6790 11 лет назад +12

    Now this explained what I've been confused about for this whole semester! Thanks :)

  • @Jeff-wc5ho
    @Jeff-wc5ho 6 лет назад +12

    Thank you for maintaining as much abstraction as possible. Theoretical Linear Algebra courses are taught from this perspective, so it's very refreshing to see instruction without computation.

  • @yuchujian8837
    @yuchujian8837 2 года назад +2

    I couldn't believe there's such an understandable explanation after reading an extremely tedious textbook authored by a pretentious man...You explained it so well!

  • @TheDrunkMexicano
    @TheDrunkMexicano 5 лет назад +35

    Just so y’all know not everyone understands this way of teaching so can u add at least add 1-3 good examples with actual numbers after each short lesson then you’ll be able to hit a larger amount of ppl. Cuz this didn’t help me whatsoever. definitely a waste of time for me

  • @anweshkumar7423
    @anweshkumar7423 5 лет назад +1

    The best thing I found on internet today.... Thanks... For making.. It...

  • @kkevinparkk
    @kkevinparkk 7 лет назад +64

    Is it just me that I can't watch his video at regular speed? I always have it at 1.25x or higher.

  • @samirpatil8350
    @samirpatil8350 7 лет назад +1

    u directly come on topic I thing u going to start with basic .....

  • @MCCMcom
    @MCCMcom 11 лет назад +2

    You explained this twice as well as my university lecturer in half the time. Thank you!!!

  • @PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD
    @PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD 12 лет назад +1

    Thanks Sal. I might have to start watching your videos first, before attending my real class lectures or reading the book material. Would save me a lot of time on trying to "connect the dots" which class lectures and my textbook typically do a poor job of doing.

  • @divyanshjain4492
    @divyanshjain4492 Год назад

    Absolutely brilliant. My concepts are rock solid now!

  • @abhinaygupta
    @abhinaygupta 6 лет назад +1

    Cleared all my doubts. Nice explaination👍

  • @ClaraB-t1k
    @ClaraB-t1k 10 месяцев назад

    thank you!
    so so so much

  • @busrraengin
    @busrraengin 4 месяца назад

    Thank you!

  • @jayaranima-mo9ft
    @jayaranima-mo9ft Год назад

    Very helpful videos

  • @salehjamsaljames
    @salehjamsaljames 13 лет назад +1

    MAAN! I love you from all my heart at the moment! you save LIVES!

  • @devarasettysaikrishnavamsh6485
    @devarasettysaikrishnavamsh6485 8 лет назад +1

    Can you please explain a video telling all the def like span, basis, eigen vectors,values

  • @MrCalhoun556
    @MrCalhoun556 14 лет назад

    Note:
    Matrices D and A which satisfy the equation D = C^-1*A*C are called Similiar Matrices. Why "similiar"? Det(D) = Det(C)^-1*Det(A)*Det(C)= Det(A)

  • @meetpatel7414
    @meetpatel7414 4 года назад

    AMAZING....THANKS..

  • @harshanarayana6937
    @harshanarayana6937 Год назад

    Fully understood

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 2 года назад

    Masterfully taught man

  • @paulchen6713
    @paulchen6713 Год назад

    Greattttttt video!!!!!!!!!

  • @Rockyzach88
    @Rockyzach88 7 лет назад +1

    If [T(x)]B = [Ax]B = [x]B, then how does [T(x)]B = D[x]B at the top where you have it written in the second domain circle. That would mean [x]B = D[x]B which doesn't make any sense. Also I just realized you basically wrote this:
    D[x]B = [T(x)]B = [Ax]B = [x]B therefore you are saying D[x]B = [x]B which doesn't make sense.

  • @spag5296
    @spag5296 4 года назад

    Explained so well!

  • @priyankrajvansh8428
    @priyankrajvansh8428 2 года назад

    Awesome!!

  • @nivshbibi
    @nivshbibi 8 лет назад

    Wow, Great lesson.
    Thank. really makes things straight

  • @ThefamousMrcroissant
    @ThefamousMrcroissant 7 лет назад +3

    I completely understand the concept, but I was looking for the actual transformation. One of the few Khan videos I've come across that let me down

  • @arbitrarilyarbitrary8440
    @arbitrarilyarbitrary8440 Год назад

    But what if we’re considering more general vector spaces where the vectors may not be elements of R^n?

  • @marshalcraft
    @marshalcraft 12 лет назад +1

    this is a mathematical topic, what relation does spelling have to correctness of an argument?

  • @ryanjackson0x
    @ryanjackson0x 3 года назад

    I don't understand. Can a basis be thought of as where you are starting on the dimensional space? (As opposed to the origin assumed)

  • @Super1337ist
    @Super1337ist 12 лет назад

    Some tablets track motion above the pad, if it's close enough.

  • @andersbyintrnational
    @andersbyintrnational 12 лет назад

    your mouse skills are incredible

  • @R41-e9y
    @R41-e9y 7 лет назад

    Using an example wouldn't be hard, and it'd only makes it easier to understand. No idea why everybody NEEDS to make it sound as academic as possible, losing half of the crowd before even getting halfway through.

  • @HrHaakon
    @HrHaakon 12 лет назад

    There should be a rule, that says that if you can't do basic spelling, you shouldn't be allowed to criticize other people's work.

  • @mohdazharalpad5442
    @mohdazharalpad5442 2 года назад

    Need example of question bro

  • @Cecilinsfilemaker
    @Cecilinsfilemaker 10 лет назад

    That is so good. I more than thankfull for that.

  • @AlexanderMcNulty92
    @AlexanderMcNulty92 6 лет назад

    Wow, you nailed it!

  • @abhinavyel166
    @abhinavyel166 4 года назад +1

    Is T(X) and [T(X)]B the same?

  • @xristos1250
    @xristos1250 Год назад

    8:49 Can somebody explain why A[nxn] is invertible if vector-columns are linearly independent?

    • @thomsondcruz
      @thomsondcruz Год назад +1

      it's a rule in LA that for a matrix to be invertible it should be a square matrix. a basis vector will be a basis for all of Rn only if it has n columns which are linearly independent making it a square matrix (there will anyways be n rows since we are talking about Rn space) and hence invertible.

    • @jessebensen3569
      @jessebensen3569 Год назад

      Look into the Invertible Matrix Theorem and it's proof, and you will have a very detailed answer to your question.
      The TLDR version is that there is a series of conditions that are either all true or all false regarding an nxn matrix, which we arbitrarily call "A". If any single condition listed in the theorem is true for A, then all of the conditions are true for A and A is invertible. Alternatively, if any single condition listed in that theorem is false for A, than all of the conditions are false for A and the matrix is not invertible.
      As you might've guessed, one of the conditions is "The columns of A form a linearly independent set".

  • @rtvcake6087
    @rtvcake6087 8 лет назад +2

    8:33

  • @mathematiciia
    @mathematiciia 14 лет назад +1

    I have a question about the last equation, if D = Cinverse * AC, doesn't that amount to D= A times the identity matrix, b/c C inverse * C is the identity matrix?

    • @olibear1966
      @olibear1966 6 лет назад

      I could not figure this out either... 7 years later.

    • @cris__98
      @cris__98 6 лет назад

      Product of matrices is not commutative (in general), so nope, it's not the case

  • @Super1337ist
    @Super1337ist 12 лет назад

    Do you have an example of this method?

  • @anujbalaji9333
    @anujbalaji9333 8 лет назад +2

    Craxx Maxx Machaxx

  • @egyMag1990
    @egyMag1990 6 лет назад

    this mean that A is the same in the standard and non standard coordinate

  • @Dusevic
    @Dusevic 14 лет назад

    i am also thinking this.

  • @sol9067
    @sol9067 8 лет назад

    I don't understand why [x]B is the same as [A*x]??? He says so 12:50 min in to the film, can someone pleas explain it to me?

  • @cyberduck9
    @cyberduck9 11 лет назад

    Thank you, you are a great teacher! :)

  • @재훈장-r5n
    @재훈장-r5n 6 лет назад

    korean translation has an error invertible is translated to not invertible instead of invertible

  • @ItzTehFarner
    @ItzTehFarner 8 лет назад

    great video it helped me a lot :)

  • @bistromathematics
    @bistromathematics 8 лет назад +1

    should be redone as keeps saying "this is this" but there is no manifestation on screen & he gets confused during important part

  • @Hepichack
    @Hepichack 9 лет назад

    The best thing is,to eat pizza while watching these amazing videos.
    But be carefull,dont forget the water,else you will regret it !!!

  • @CamaraLaurent
    @CamaraLaurent 12 лет назад

    @andersbyintrnational he's not using a mouse lol

  • @kiaroscyuro
    @kiaroscyuro 9 лет назад +36

    watching this video was a total waste of time because absolutely none of it made any sense. it is extremely difficult to follow along when everything is so abstract

  • @BigPapaMitchell
    @BigPapaMitchell 11 лет назад

    I love you

  • @samus88
    @samus88 12 лет назад

    If it's not a mouse, then what's with the cursor?

  • @seungmiroh5332
    @seungmiroh5332 6 лет назад

    C의 역행렬이 존재하는데 왜 안한다고 번역을 ....

  • @shakhlokhodjaeva8084
    @shakhlokhodjaeva8084 8 лет назад

    confusing still

  • @samus88
    @samus88 12 лет назад

    He never lifts the pen out of the screen?

  • @cecepskj6948
    @cecepskj6948 Год назад

    bnggsdd keras bet ni gurunya, arigatou, kamsamida, xie xie laoshi

  • @abdullahhabboush955
    @abdullahhabboush955 7 лет назад

    The most confusing concept in my lifeeeeee!!!
    I mean who the hell created this thing....

  • @farouku5334
    @farouku5334 3 года назад

    Sal, you should have been named Jesus.

  • @existentialhead7074
    @existentialhead7074 6 лет назад +2

    wow this is awful, straight up just rambling for 18 minutes

  • @freaky504
    @freaky504 10 лет назад

    Thanks a lot for this wonderful video.

  • @shibu703
    @shibu703 12 лет назад

    amazing ...!