My method is similar to the Parley, but I continue by 1 unit at a time until a loss. 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150... etc., then after a loss, back to 25. Seems to capitalize on the winning streaks. I think the highest I got up to on the $25 base best was $300 (12 wins). If I play at a $50 table, I start at 50 and still typically only go up 25 at a time after that.
Oscar's Grind doesn't work as you said. If you lose you keep on betting the previous amount until you win and you keep on increasing of one unit after each win (or keeping the previous bet if losing) until you have one unit profit. If during the comeback you can decrease the bet to reach the one unit profit you decrease it. In my opinion is the best strategy. Someone will laugh but it works better on rng cause it shuffles after each hand so the odds are always the same. If you play with a 300 unit bankroll you are going to win in approximately the 99,5% of cases.
The martingale doesnt work in the long run because the one time that you ll lose , you ll lose a hell lot of money, while every time you win, you get your minimum bet
It's a slow and steady system. Mathematically speaking it makes money but the unfortunate reality is there is a major flaw in the fact that it requires a bottomless bankroll to cover losses and allow for wildly increasing bets and that you will eventually hit the table wager limit. Only surefire way to never lose is never play.
Not only that but if your starting bet is say $20 in no time you'll usually be above the table limit. Locally we have a Casino with minimum $10 and a table limit of $500. By using the Martindale System with a starting bet of $10 the seventh bet will be over the table limit ($640).
Total Bullshit! There is no progressive betting strategy that will overcome a mathematical disadvantage. You must learn basic strategy to play your hands correctly. That will get you close to even. To have any chance of winning in the long run, you must bet more when you have the advantage and minimum when the casino has the advantage. This requires card counting.
This guy totally lost his credibility when he said every betting stratrgy would be progressive in some way. Those are all losing strategies. The only betting strategy that works is to have perfect card counting skills coupled with a big enough bank roll to minimize your risk of ruin to 2% or less. A 1 - 6 unit bet spread per hand is optimal to achieve that 2% risk with 1000x the minimum bet.
My method is similar to the Parley, but I continue by 1 unit at a time until a loss.
25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150... etc., then after a loss, back to 25. Seems to capitalize on the winning streaks.
I think the highest I got up to on the $25 base best was $300 (12 wins).
If I play at a $50 table, I start at 50 and still typically only go up 25 at a time after that.
Stakes wise a little higher than I like to play but the method sounds interesting. Ill give it a demo thanks
3 streaks is enough up till $300
If i lose back to $25.problem is when u hit $300 bet u hit a 7/7 card
Hey Dominick,
Good Video. I liked Parley the best.
Thank You 😎🇺🇸
Right on! Thanks :)
@@AllAmericanCasinoGuide I mastered the Basic Strategy and have considered a lot of betting strategies and have now decided like you.....Parlay.
Oscar's Grind doesn't work as you said. If you lose you keep on betting the previous amount until you win and you keep on increasing of one unit after each win (or keeping the previous bet if losing) until you have one unit profit. If during the comeback you can decrease the bet to reach the one unit profit you decrease it. In my opinion is the best strategy. Someone will laugh but it works better on rng cause it shuffles after each hand so the odds are always the same. If you play with a 300 unit bankroll you are going to win in approximately the 99,5% of cases.
Thankyou for the personal insights
What if you facing a double down situation and you lose it. How you gonna deal with this situation?
What is the best betting strategy for low rollers Dominic?
Sup Dominic...just found the channel ...super helpful and we'll put together video..😊
Playing basic strategy, if you stick by any of these systems; you will not ever split or double down or it will totally wreck the projected outcome 🤔
overall for an amateur black jack player, which of these strategies are the easiest to adopt on a regular basis?
Flat betting the minimum always
Can I use this in baccarat
Hi, check these video for Baccarat strategies: ruclips.net/video/FPTNfmVFQbM/видео.html
I’ ll lost so much money the martingale method, its flawed
Sad to hear. It's definitely flawed, since it assumes an infinitely-deep bankroll and the absence of a table limit.
I turned 200 into 2500 over 3 days. It works if you play the bet min, but the second your ahead leave the game to avoid risk of ruin
The martingale doesnt work in the long run because the one time that you ll lose , you ll lose a hell lot of money, while every time you win, you get your minimum bet
It's a slow and steady system. Mathematically speaking it makes money but the unfortunate reality is there is a major flaw in the fact that it requires a bottomless bankroll to cover losses and allow for wildly increasing bets and that you will eventually hit the table wager limit. Only surefire way to never lose is never play.
Not only that but if your starting bet is say $20 in no time you'll usually be above the table limit. Locally we have a Casino with minimum $10 and a table limit of $500. By using the Martindale System with a starting bet of $10 the seventh bet will be over the table limit ($640).
@@eddie-xi6ls Isn't that only if you lose 7 hands in a row? But if you win you go back to your original bet?
@@brucefoster4106 Personally if I'm new at that table I'll be gone after three loses in a row therefore I won't see seven.
Only way you win in BJ over your lifetime is to learn how to be a counter (AP) Otherwise, it’s just recreational for you guys
Deep pocket hahaha
Total Bullshit! There is no progressive betting strategy that will overcome a mathematical disadvantage. You must learn basic strategy to play your hands correctly. That will get you close to even. To have any chance of winning in the long run, you must bet more when you have the advantage and minimum when the casino has the advantage. This requires card counting.
This guy totally lost his credibility when he said every betting stratrgy would be progressive in some way. Those are all losing strategies. The only betting strategy that works is to have perfect card counting skills coupled with a big enough bank roll to minimize your risk of ruin to 2% or less. A 1 - 6 unit bet spread per hand is optimal to achieve that 2% risk with 1000x the minimum bet.
this guy totally lost his credibility when he said he had a winning system