So the clearly visible shoe-shine boy isn't worth mentioning? The photo was also taken at 8am, so not the busiest time of day, and I would bet if he took it a little later, there would have been a number of people on the cafe tables across the street - may even be in that photo, but it's too indistinct, and the original is long gone.
![Man Born in 1853 Talks About Childhood in the 1860s- Enhanced Video & Audio [60 fps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_oqbLSisnME/mqdefault.jpg)
Great stuff, well done!
Bruh you so copied Zack flims
So WHEN wa a it taken? Back up your claim. Itd be interesting had you bothered to find out that critical fact.
Here, I did it for you. Taken in 1838.
What claim? It's one of the most famous photographs of all time. A Daguerrotype actually made by the man himself. Not too hard to find that out.
So the clearly visible shoe-shine boy isn't worth mentioning? The photo was also taken at 8am, so not the busiest time of day, and I would bet if he took it a little later, there would have been a number of people on the cafe tables across the street - may even be in that photo, but it's too indistinct, and the original is long gone.