RF Intermodulation and the RF Explorer Pro Audio Edition

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @AtlantaSoundGuy
    @AtlantaSoundGuy 2 года назад +2

    Great job Allen ! --
    Tel your fans to call us when they are looking for RF solutions .. It's what we do :)

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      It totally is. If anyone is reading this and needs RF related services, I can totally vouch for RF Systems Consultants.

    • @valhalarusu6238
      @valhalarusu6238 2 года назад +2

      @@SoundSpeeds does The Sennheiser MKH-50 need an audio interface or a preamp

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      Yes

    • @valhalarusu6238
      @valhalarusu6238 2 года назад

      @@SoundSpeeds which one is preferable

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад

      Since this is totally on topic to this video, I'll answer you... Depends.

  • @marfaworks
    @marfaworks 10 месяцев назад +1

    Bravo & thank you - you’re a scholar and a gentleman.

  • @POLARICED
    @POLARICED 2 года назад +1

    Thank god there are engineers and software that take care of RF, my head is spinning with all this knowledge

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      You're not the only one. RF is a deep rabbit hole with no end. It's amazing and scary just as it is necessary and confusing.

  • @Mac1Sound
    @Mac1Sound 2 года назад +4

    Hi Allen, glorious vid as usual mate, over here in Europe, an amazing guy has designed a programme for android devices called TX Advance, it includes scanning ( need a dongle) intermod calc and frequency deployment to your TX's and it's on a special price right now, I took the leap ( and had to buy an android device, cos I'm an Apple fanboy) I would highly recommend taking a look at it mate. it doesn't work with RF Explorer at the moment BUT I think its an excellent start. Just thought I'd share it with everyone.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      I'm a beta tester and will be announcing a Livestream testing it tonight. Tune in this Saturday at 3PM for tests live

  • @nathanksimpson
    @nathanksimpson Год назад +1

    Interesting how intuitive RF is for sound people when you couch it in terms of waves and harmonics. Making the esoteric accessible!

  • @ScottBeattyProSound
    @ScottBeattyProSound 2 года назад +1

    You're a brave man doing this much math in a live stream!!! Salute!

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад

      The good thing is that most people won't double-check my math. The bad thing is that this the internet and someone always will.

  • @luisa9628
    @luisa9628 2 года назад +1

    Think I'm going to have to watch that a couple more times to fully absorb it.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад

      It'll be there. :-) Thank you for watching.

  • @bahathir_
    @bahathir_ 2 года назад +1

    Nice explanations about the IM. With that kind of knowledge level, you may easily pass Radio Amateur Exam. :)
    Yes, we may create IM and harmonics frequencies, but how it affecting the quality of the audio signal, depends on how good the RF filter circuit of the receiver. A very good receiver/radio ables to reject all the IM and harmonics. So, look at the receiving performance when purchasing wireless system.
    Thank you.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      Exactly right. I just got into TX in this video. Receiving is a whole different creature. Thanks for watching.

    • @bahathir_
      @bahathir_ 2 года назад +1

      @@SoundSpeeds
      Trnsmitting (TX) RF is important, but not as crucial as receiving (RX) it. TX may creates harminics and IM, but we are not RX those frequencies. Anyway it is still good to know what is happening around us. If we really want to see what RF are around us, just get a cheap USB Software DEfined Radio (SDR), and explore. It also nice when we need to use/select certain frequency or band on location, because we able to 'see' what frequencies at the location.
      Thank you, again. :)

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      You're right, there's a lot that goes into receiving. That's another video entirely.

    • @bahathir_
      @bahathir_ 2 года назад +1

      @@SoundSpeeds
      Great Looking forwared for the video. :)
      Thank you, Sir.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      Sure thing.

  • @longwelsh
    @longwelsh 2 года назад +1

    I once had to give a Lecture on this and it didn’t go as smooth as yours. You forgot to include the extra channels potentially in huge same band for IFB and boom TB.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад

      RF is RF but you are correct.

  • @VidMashUp
    @VidMashUp Год назад +1

    *knock knock* FCC! Open up!

  • @charliehinde1701
    @charliehinde1701 2 года назад +1

    So the new DME range with Wisycom is actually nothing special??

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      Lectrosonics makes far more sensitive equipment and coordinates.

    • @ScottBeattyProSound
      @ScottBeattyProSound 2 года назад +2

      DME range from first glance appears interesting for usages where other bands are congested or otherwise problematic. My take on this, without testing the gear first hand, is that you should be mindful when considering higher-frequency radio systems, because the wavelengths are smaller, so RF obstructions like metal stuff, car panels, human bodies, etc. will have significantly greater effect. Line of sight will be very important as well. Try before you buy, and consider usages where line of sight is likely, such as handheld microphones and sends to camera.

    • @SoundSpeeds
      @SoundSpeeds  2 года назад +1

      And that's also the appeal behind 941. It's away from most of what other users would be in or near. When transmitters are below 608MHz and IFBs are in 941, it's made for a very pleasant experience to my experience.