Youngest Ever Player To Defeat Magnus Carlsen (29 Moves)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 дек 2024
- The new World Chess Champion, Gukesh D, was and still is the Youngest Player To Ever Defeat Magnus Carlsen when he did it in 29 Moves and made chess history! This in the AimChess Prelims in 2022. Incredible game of epic chess!
www.chess.com/...
♖ LEARN CHESS ► chess-teacher....
♖ PLAY CHESS ► go.chess.com/e...
💲 DONATE ► www.paypal.me/...
♖ CHANNEL MEMBERSHIP ► / @epicchess2021
🖥️ DISCORD COMMUNITY ► / discord
☝️ INQUIRIES ► epicchess2021@gmail.com
#chess #carlsen #magnuscarlsen #epicchess #gukesh
His moves are even more epic when narrated by a man wearing Christmas attire making woosh sounds
Maybe Gukesh will motivate Magnus to come back and play for world #1. Magnus really has no serious competition right now, so Gukesh may be the fuel for the fire.
what a move
I think you mean 'vot a moof'?
what....... a...... move......
I laughed. loudly.
I was seriously going to say this
My chess needs are met on a daily here
0:08 Gukesh = 18th @ 18!
That is one massive bragging right!
4:57 Queen's gambit declined
Unbelievable! I haven't even watched the entire video and it's unbelievable!
haha true
I havent even open my laptop and I told myself "what a game"
Eval Barowitsch
Eval Barovitch
Good game takes a lot to beat Magnus Gukesh was spot on with those moves intense game .Gukesh has a lot of respect for Magnus most Indian players acknowledge how great he is but we’ll probably never see Magnus compete in the FWC. Thanks for the Game James hope you feel better soon
French Cheese… the Brie defence 🪤
Your lack of mushrooms disturbs me!
the truly very well proportioned goats are the friends we met along the way
I hope you feel better Epic Chess
why does Magnus look like a completely different person in every single RUclips thumbnail?
Always remember, one game won is nothing... Magnus will come back with way more fire
I expect you next to Joe Rogan at UFC 313! #UFCHEESE
The meaning of some words changes over time due to widespread misuse, and the incorrect usage eventually becomes accepted as the standard. This shift often erases the original meaning, leading to confusion about how these words should be used.
Take, for example, the word *undisputed*. In theory, it should mean "not questioned, challenged, or debated." An *undisputed champion*, then, would be a champion whose status remains unchallenged because no one contests their superiority. However, in contexts like boxing, *undisputed champion* refers to someone who holds all the titles from the major sanctioning bodies. This usage is technical and valid within the sport, but it diverges from the word's broader meaning. In chess, referring to a world chess champion as *undisputed* is even more problematic, as becoming the champion requires winning a dispute ‒ a highly contested world chess match. In this case, the term is misapplied, as the title is achieved through precisely the kind of contest the word *undisputed* implies does not exist.
Another example of semantic drift is the word *acute*. It originally meant "sharp" or "keen," both in a literal and metaphorical sense (e.g., acute intellect or acute pain). Over time, its shortened form, *cute*, took on a new meaning entirely, referring to something charming or physically attractive. While *cute* has lost any connection to sharpness or cleverness, its evolution from *acute* is still traceable.
Similarly, the word *irony* has undergone significant changes. Derived from the Greek *eironeia*, meaning "feigned ignorance," it originally described a rhetorical method used by philosophers, such as Socrates, who pretended ignorance to draw out the truth. Over time, *irony* came to signify intentional misrepresentation, such as pretending to be less intelligent than one is. Today, it is primarily used to describe situations where the outcome is contrary to expectations or to refer to statements that convey a meaning opposite to their literal words.
Another word that has shifted meaning is *sophisticated*. Historically, it meant "adulterated" or "made unnecessarily complex to deceive." Now, it is often used to describe someone or something that is refined, cultured, or technologically advanced ‒ a far cry from its original negative connotation.
These examples highlight how the misuse of words can lead to their meanings evolving into something entirely different. While language naturally changes, some shifts can obscure clarity and distort the original intent of words.
Forsooth, that's a lot of knights!
can we see actual fish stock in the video
Epic Commentary !
Marionette Candlestick. No other videos I watch ever make me laugh within the first 10 seconds of pressing play, Margarine Carton set me off giggling for about ten minutes a while back, lol.
Haha thanks a lot for watching
Move magnus, new king came
Crazzzy
Mushrooms
So are they better than Carlson?
Not really clear on how many games were played
They are better than Carlson, the Swedish GM. But far weaker than the Norwegian Carlsen.
Wait! No mushrooms, no "boufff what a move", no procedure? What's going on? Unsubscribing now!
Ps.. Get well soon James
I don't think Gukesh is that good. He won the Chess Championship by luck
I agree I don't think he's top 3 in the world but don't agree he won by luck, final game was a blunder but I see him as the worthy winner and better player throughout overall
Also people forget that he's only 18. Who knows what his future holds?
@@epicchess2021 There are speculations that Ding lost on purpose
@@epicchess2021 He had a good opening strategies, but it was one of the most boring world championships ever. Also there are speculations, that Ding lost on purpose
@@apathologicalliar748doesn't matter for me he will remain as a boring personality person, like fabi is.