🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🎓 This lecture discusses modern jurisprudence and focuses on H.L.A. Hart, a prominent positivist philosopher. 01:26 📜 Hart's main work is "The Concept of Law," where he critiques John Austin's command theory and introduces his own account of law. 04:40 📚 Hart's criticism of Austin includes the "internal point of view," which focuses on how people perceive and obey legal directives differently based on the source of the directive. 06:32 🔍 Hart defines a legal system as having both primary rules (regulating conduct) and secondary rules (specifying how primary laws are made and enforced). 10:43 🤝 The key difference between inclusive and exclusive positivists is whether legal directives can require moral analysis; inclusive positivists allow for moral inquiry within legal reasoning. 13:24 🤔 All positivists differ from natural lawyers in that they believe the goodness of law does not affect its legality. Made with HARPA AI
![Natural Law Jurisprudence in Aquinas and Blackstone [No. 86 LECTURE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dyqZMlhryS8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Natural Law Jurisprudence in Aquinas and Blackstone [No. 86 LECTURE]](/img/tr.png)
![Modern Natural Law Theory: Fuller and Finnis [No. 86 LECTURE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3n2hCV641Mw/mqdefault.jpg)
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 🎓 This lecture discusses modern jurisprudence and focuses on H.L.A. Hart, a prominent positivist philosopher.
01:26 📜 Hart's main work is "The Concept of Law," where he critiques John Austin's command theory and introduces his own account of law.
04:40 📚 Hart's criticism of Austin includes the "internal point of view," which focuses on how people perceive and obey legal directives differently based on the source of the directive.
06:32 🔍 Hart defines a legal system as having both primary rules (regulating conduct) and secondary rules (specifying how primary laws are made and enforced).
10:43 🤝 The key difference between inclusive and exclusive positivists is whether legal directives can require moral analysis; inclusive positivists allow for moral inquiry within legal reasoning.
13:24 🤔 All positivists differ from natural lawyers in that they believe the goodness of law does not affect its legality.
Made with HARPA AI
Perhaps
Scalia Center for Jiggerypockery