@@gal3sz hey mate, just a question on the mk2s - how do you like them? I’ve heard good things about them. I can see that they they don’t have a knob to adjust the jog wheel tension, how would you describe the default tension on them? On the CDJ2000nx2 and 3000, I have the tension max, do you think I would dislike the jog on the mk2s?
@@matt13211 These players are the best bet if you don't wan't to spend the premium price of the CDJ2000/3000.Small player with standard size jogwheel,made of plastic so its also very light weight.Easy to use.Cheaper version of the 2000NXS2 but the software is the same.The jogwheel tension I would say its in the middle like on the 2000 the 3000 is different tech.I'ts personal preference I think what settings u like.Back in the day I had CDJs like 800,1000,2000 mk1,played on 900NXS and 2000NXS and all is the same jogwheel. Sold it couple of months ago cuz wanted to buy the 3000 but again out of stock.So now maybe I opt for Denons or get a pair of XDJ700 until its available.Secretly hoping from update on these players from pioneer cuz they are 6-7 year old at this point.
First of all, love this set very much. Really great atmosphere, well done!!! Second, happy about the 96 and 1000mkII’s? Was thinking about buying the same set up but don’t know if I better would buy the Nexus 2 or the 3000’s as mediaplayers. (So expensive 😱)
Hey!Thank You for the kind words, it means a lot to me!!Have the 96 almost 2 years now and I can't decide if its better than the 92 or not.The faders are the weak ones I don't like them,the crunch is useless I miss the LFO's from the 92, but the rest is fine.The XDJ's are the perfect players in my opinion if you are on a budget.I would love to own a pair of CDJ3000;s hell even the 2000NXS2 would be cool too.Maybe later on I will upgrade,but for now these players will do, maybe getting a 3rd one down the road.
Good sound, good feeling 💚👍🏼👏🏼💯
Killer selection mate
Thank you!
@@gal3sz hey mate, just a question on the mk2s - how do you like them? I’ve heard good things about them. I can see that they they don’t have a knob to adjust the jog wheel tension, how would you describe the default tension on them? On the CDJ2000nx2 and 3000, I have the tension max, do you think I would dislike the jog on the mk2s?
@@matt13211 These players are the best bet if you don't wan't to spend the premium price of the CDJ2000/3000.Small player with standard size jogwheel,made of plastic so its also very light weight.Easy to use.Cheaper version of the 2000NXS2 but the software is the same.The jogwheel tension I would say its in the middle like on the 2000 the 3000 is different tech.I'ts personal preference I think what settings u like.Back in the day I had CDJs like 800,1000,2000 mk1,played on 900NXS and 2000NXS and all is the same jogwheel.
Sold it couple of months ago cuz wanted to buy the 3000 but again out of stock.So now maybe I opt for Denons or get a pair of XDJ700 until its available.Secretly hoping from update on these players from pioneer cuz they are 6-7 year old at this point.
@@gal3sz sweet mate thanks a lot
Nice mix
First of all, love this set very much. Really great atmosphere, well done!!! Second, happy about the 96 and 1000mkII’s? Was thinking about buying the same set up but don’t know if I better would buy the Nexus 2 or the 3000’s as mediaplayers. (So expensive 😱)
Ok🤔
Hey!Thank You for the kind words, it means a lot to me!!Have the 96 almost 2 years now and I can't decide if its better than the 92 or not.The faders are the weak ones I don't like them,the crunch is useless I miss the LFO's from the 92, but the rest is fine.The XDJ's are the perfect players in my opinion if you are on a budget.I would love to own a pair of CDJ3000;s hell even the 2000NXS2 would be cool too.Maybe later on I will upgrade,but for now these players will do, maybe getting a 3rd one down the road.
Which stands do you use for the Cdj‘s?
www.ebay.co.uk/itm/352863446663
Many version exist my one is under the name pulse
So my link got deleted?Nevermind...Look for heavy duty laptop stand