Excellent presentational skills you have shown us, kept us captivated till the last. Last few lines yours and Dr C V Raman's are really touching. So true, the country of highest number of Science Graduates heardly contributed much in recent past (last 4/5 decades). These are names equally respected to be honoured with Noble prize, Meghnath Saha, Shambhnath Dey, Prafullachandra Roy, Sayendranath Bose, Prasanto Mahalanabish, Jagadishchandra Bose, Subhas Mukherjee..... Please do make video on them as a series of great Indian subcontinent's scientific minds. All the very best.
Also, Blue is only color that is not naturally produced from pigments. Its literally the arrangement of objects on miniscule scale that reflect light on a specific angle Thats why anything blue thats found in nature, change their shade as you move your viewing angle to darker or lighter.
@@nilopaldas1473 As far I know, animals like crabs, octopuses, etc have blue blood. They have a pigment called hemocyanin inside their blood which has copper atom (instead of iron in the case of hemoglobin) which absorb all colors except blue.
Good video. I think the problem is that many Indians think that subscribing 500 year old beliefs and practices makes them more righteous. The other problem is lack of capital.
Just wanted to thank you for this video. I got in a dumb argument online because a guy said that the reason for the color of the sky was the Raman effect, and unfortunately i had never heard of CV Raman. This video answered every question i had, because i knew it was Rayleigh scattering or elastic scattering, but i had never heard of inelastic scattering or Raman spectrometry. Incredible man, fascinating topic!
Problem with Indian science is that the pioneers of it like CV Raman etc are so reactionary and promote brahmanic worldview (He and Krishna were in close association with Saibaba ). He doesn't have a scientific temper (Oppose Nehre always) and always behaves like a temple priest. He was a misogynist so many female researchers lost the opportunity to do research. Your channel should have mentioned this also as a reason for degradation of science in India. Real Raman effect is the reactionary influence of him in Indian science progress.
this is true. the unfortunate truth is that due to rampant caste barriers only the upper caste were allowed to gain education and make contributions towards science (even with this, most of the scientists had quite backward thoughts- most of them believed in the idea of caste). we may have made advancements in science and math, but our scientific temper is still stagnant as ever.
@@V-for-Vendetta01 I think its lot to do with the society we lives in. Even today highly qualified technicians and mbbs doctors believes in notion of gods and divine creature while science simply debunked them. Our premises is buid in such a way and this has to be change to promote more rationality around us
@@scienceisdope And also , there is a video of him in which he says that quran in 700 BC told about the earth being round , as only a creator can tell you about the features of a device he created , So it must be the creator who wrote quran , i found this analogy completely childish but i cant form argument against it because of my lack of experience in this kind of topic.
Such an excellent explanation of Raman effect without use of any complicated terms. Its so great to see such amazing scientific content being produced in India.
ECG Sudarshan should have been given a Nobel price too, for the Glauber-Sudarshan representation. Roy J Glauber literally stole Sudarshan's work and won a Nobel prize.
Let’s go you helped me in my holiday homework I am only in 9th class still they gave us to make ppt on Raman effect like just why . I was not able to understand from other videos and google but you helped me understand it
Loved your explanation.I have watched videos on Raman Effect but somehow I get lost into the intricate complexities and forget the main concept. But with this video,I know that I will never forget the concept-"inelastic scattering of light". Looking forward for more such videos.
Hey bro can you do a vid on the new abhi and niyu vid bout Vedic planes and stuff I've noticed nothing but the pushing of false narratives in the video
@@scienceisdope man... Lol! But I think They should upload things about the issues like the education system and many things are there that they used to do before.
Kamala Sohonie - : - ‘Though Raman was a great scientist, he was very narrowminded. Other women such as Anna Mani (q.v.) and K. Sunanda Bai also faced prejudice and hostility from him. Kamala recounted to the members of the IWSA, ‘I can never forget the way [Raman] treated me just because I was a woman.
@@pleasemakethatface3579 He destroyed Indian scientific progress. Indian scientists taking advice from priest and do religious ceremony, when they send rocket to the Mars. All these things are normalized in India because of him and nobody see the problem there.
@@neeloor2004able yeaa... Low funding.. Making a cheap satellite is seen as achievement and people who are interested in fundamental sciences are pushed in to engineering... Has nothing to do with india being back...
Thank you bro We had and have great scientists but very few Few..... Today students want to crack JEE NEET and learn problem solving but very few wants to study with investigatory mindset Few....
Why? Coz the science students best of the best,under air 100 r gonna sit infront of a computer screen in a multi-billion dollar company or gonna go abroad. India needs to spend more on rnd for sure
There is a story Carl Sagan tells in pale blue dot. When the first Mars rover was taking pics of Mars atmosphere, there were bets on the sky color and smart money was on pink. But guess what, the color came out as blue. That was because of the adjustment done by the image processing team who transposed it until it "looked right". It was readjusted and it is pink.
@@danishdubey I’m sorry American Indians and Indians immigrated to US and technology borrowed from Russia and people who forsaken Indian citizenship doesn’t count
Dr. Sir C. V. Raman is not the only one who received Nobel prize in science. There were two Nobel laureates from India who received their Nobel prizes before India gained independence. The first laureate was Dr. Sir Ronald Ross, who discovered the malarial parasite. He was born in British-ruled India and conducted his research in Calcutta, Secunderabad, and Bangalore. Consequently, India earned its first Nobel prize in science in 1902. The second Nobel prize in science was awarded to Dr. Sir C. V. Raman in 1930, for his work on the Raman effect. Like Dr. Ronald Ross, Dr. Raman was also born in India and conducted his entire research in the country. Both Nobel prizes were awarded to individuals from what was then known as British India. Since India gained independence, no one from the country has received a Nobel prize in science. However, there have been Nobel laureates of Indian origin who conducted their scientific research mainly in foreign countries, particularly the United States. As a result, their awards were dedicated to the countries they migrated to. In essence, Dr. Sir Ronald Ross remains the first Nobel laureate in science from India.
CV Raman is not only person who won nobel price in science in india. Har Gobind Khorana, Subrahmanyam Chandrasekhar and Venkatraman Ramakrishna also won
I didn't say he's the only person. I said this is the only such scientific work from India. The other scientists u mentioned did their work from the US.
Getting noble is not only the achieving thing , with deu respect for Dr CV Raman, India has produced great scientist , like SN Bose ,Meghnad Saha , Ashoke Sen , many others , the point is No one have did any scientific experiment in India to get a Nobel except Raman , Where the world is experimenting on various projects, India is rejecting INO ,which is depressing. If a person have interest in experimental neutrino physics ,he/she will have to go abroad to reasearch
7:18 one small correction. The total energy in any collision never changes, irrespective of type of collision. In inelastic collision, it is just that some part of the total energy is being lost in the form of heat, sound, (even light) etc. Whereas in an elastic, most of it (even all of it) remains intact (for the lack of better word) i.e. Not lost to other forms!☝️
Any sources to read and understand why 1. Electron absorbs electromagnetic radiation and jumps to higher orbital or, emits electromagnetic radiation and jumps to lower orbital, 2. Moving charge produces magnetic field, 3. Accelerating charge emits electromagnetic radiation?
@@abhijeettarange4092 Ok; To be honest i feel electrodynamics is still incomplete; so there is no established answer for (1) yet ,but there is for (2) ie : since charge by definition has electric field coming out or in; when it is accelerated, it creates an accelerated (changing)electric field around charge. Now as we know from maxwell laws that changing electric field creates changing magnetic field , a magnetic field is created; now heres the catch: varying electric field and magnetic field are capable of producing each other so they self sustain and start propagating(considering no loss of energy) which we see as E.M radiation. Now for the first one i am actually a researcher and developing a "scientific and mathematical" theory to explain some things; so no answer till then...
1. What will happen if we look the sun by our naked eye from moon? 2. Are all stars white in color like our sun's picture from moon? 3. If yes to 2nd question why do we consider blue stars massive and red stars low mass? 4. Lets say if our sun is replaced by a very massive star that is blue in hertzsprung russel diagram. Then if we would look at it from EARTH will it appear blue or yellow or white?? These are some questions which I couldn't find proper solutions
1. It'll be very bright. If you look for too long, it'll burn your retina. Also the sky will be black. 2. Not all. Red and blue stars (like Rigel, betelguese etc. ) Exist . 3. Mass doesn't have anything to do with colour. Colour is determined by how much energy comes out of a star. There are red and blue coloured massive stars. 4. I'm not sure, but I'm assuming it won't look yellow since it's light spectrum is mostly blue. Also I think the sky will look even more darker blue. Also sunsets with this star will not look orange for sure :)
youre seriously rgt abt the money thing dude...i had recently asked my friend what she wanted to pick after 10th...she said science but i knew she was a bit laggy regarding the subject...and when i asked her abt it she just went like " if i pick science and become doctor my future will be set with no problems"......it was kind of heartbreaking to hear that all in the tone she said it...
You were explaining Raman effect in great way, then suddenly you mess up with explaination. Nobody is perfect in this world. It was fairly good attempt for a first time seeker.
The only scientific work of India to win a Nobel prize? It is absolutely not true. Nobel is a joke...if it was serious then JC BOSE, Satyandranath Bose, H.J Bhabha etc deserved nobel also.
Most of your videos are targeting Hindus , so other faiths and countries have all scientific , why don't you praise scientific aspects of Hinduism . Like many rituals , festivals , yoga etc ??? Your b ia s doesn't allow it ??
There's also an excellent documentary known as the quantum indians. It shows the life story of cv Raman very nicely
Think I've seen that
@@scienceisdope make a video on Satyendra nath Bose
Excellent presentational skills you have shown us, kept us captivated till the last.
Last few lines yours and Dr C V Raman's are really touching. So true, the country of highest number of Science Graduates heardly contributed much in recent past (last 4/5 decades). These are names equally respected to be honoured with Noble prize, Meghnath Saha, Shambhnath Dey, Prafullachandra Roy,
Sayendranath Bose, Prasanto Mahalanabish, Jagadishchandra Bose, Subhas Mukherjee.....
Please do make video on them as a series of great Indian subcontinent's scientific minds.
All the very best.
Also, Blue is only color that is not naturally produced from pigments. Its literally the arrangement of objects on miniscule scale that reflect light on a specific angle Thats why anything blue thats found in nature, change their shade as you move your viewing angle to darker or lighter.
Yup. There are some extremely rare blue pigments I believe
@@scienceisdope Extremely Rare. yep.
@@rajanjayesh1886 Could you please name some pigments?
@@nilopaldas1473 So far only Naturally formed blue pigment is by a butterfly.
@@nilopaldas1473 As far I know, animals like crabs, octopuses, etc have blue blood.
They have a pigment called hemocyanin inside their blood which has copper atom (instead of iron in the case of hemoglobin) which absorb all colors except blue.
Good video. I think the problem is that many Indians think that subscribing 500 year old beliefs and practices makes them more righteous. The other problem is lack of capital.
His life is an inspiration and thank you so much for bringing it to public attention. You are doin great work
Nailed it, bro! 🔥 Keep making more such videos.
This video is so good! The conclusion at the end can't be more concise. Keep up the good work 💪
Thanks man!
Well articulated as always !
Thanks man
@@scienceisdope you are a gigaChad
Always look forward to these.
Amazing video, explained really well. Keep making more.
Just wanted to thank you for this video. I got in a dumb argument online because a guy said that the reason for the color of the sky was the Raman effect, and unfortunately i had never heard of CV Raman. This video answered every question i had, because i knew it was Rayleigh scattering or elastic scattering, but i had never heard of inelastic scattering or Raman spectrometry. Incredible man, fascinating topic!
Problem with Indian science is that the pioneers of it like CV Raman etc are so reactionary and promote brahmanic worldview (He and Krishna were in close association with Saibaba ). He doesn't have a scientific temper (Oppose Nehre always) and always behaves like a temple priest. He was a misogynist so many female researchers lost the opportunity to do research. Your channel should have mentioned this also as a reason for degradation of science in India. Real Raman effect is the reactionary influence of him in Indian science progress.
this is true. the unfortunate truth is that due to rampant caste barriers only the upper caste were allowed to gain education and make contributions towards science (even with this, most of the scientists had quite backward thoughts- most of them believed in the idea of caste). we may have made advancements in science and math, but our scientific temper is still stagnant as ever.
@@V-for-Vendetta01 I think its lot to do with the society we lives in. Even today highly qualified technicians and mbbs doctors believes in notion of gods and divine creature while science simply debunked them. Our premises is buid in such a way and this has to be change to promote more rationality around us
Eagerly waiting brother,
One request,
What happened to Zakir Naik's video bro?
I have to use it to disprove my relatives' opinion on him
Will remake that
@@scienceisdope And also , there is a video of him in which he says that quran in 700 BC told about the earth being round , as only a creator can tell you about the features of a device he created , So it must be the creator who wrote quran , i found this analogy completely childish but i cant form argument against it because of my lack of experience in this kind of topic.
thank you sir when u told every thing my all question r clear i have subscribed once again thank u sir
Man, Your videos are always overpowered!! Hats off to your hard work and research on that topic.
Such an excellent explanation of Raman effect without use of any complicated terms. Its so great to see such amazing scientific content being produced in India.
Awesome video and presentation. You got a new subscriber today. Awesome work . Keep it up
Superb video on Raman effect..one of the best on RUclips.. thank you so much sir...🙏🙏♥️🙏🙏
Incredible video. You explained it so clearly. Loved watching it.
Brilliant! We want more this kind of videos.
Very informative video finally I got to know the Raman effect thankyou very much sir
ECG Sudarshan should have been given a Nobel price too, for the Glauber-Sudarshan representation. Roy J Glauber literally stole Sudarshan's work and won a Nobel prize.
Greatly explained this topic, wonderful video, pls keep going.
And yes,
Science was, is and always will be the most dope thing out there.
Let’s go you helped me in my holiday homework I am only in 9th class still they gave us to make ppt on Raman effect like just why . I was not able to understand from other videos and google but you helped me understand it
Good educational video among debunking all these pseudoscience.
Loved your explanation.I have watched videos on Raman Effect but somehow I get lost into the intricate complexities and forget the main concept. But with this video,I know that I will never forget the concept-"inelastic scattering of light".
Looking forward for more such videos.
Great video!
Also, how cool it would be if the sky was violet! xD
Love you brother
I love Derek's video and your video is also great, i hope in India youtube science community will also grow
Hey bro can you do a vid on the new abhi and niyu vid bout Vedic planes and stuff
I've noticed nothing but the pushing of false narratives in the video
Yes :)
That video is a joke, Ancient Aliens level bs. No proper sources given
@@adityab1277 ancient aliens is in fact the source 😂
@@scienceisdope thanks man!
@@scienceisdope man... Lol! But I think They should upload things about the issues like the education system and many things are there that they used to do before.
i am a physicist and i am impressed by ur explanation
Kamala Sohonie - : - ‘Though Raman was a great scientist, he was very narrowminded. Other women such as Anna Mani (q.v.) and K. Sunanda Bai also faced prejudice and hostility from him. Kamala recounted to the members of the IWSA, ‘I can never forget the way [Raman] treated me just because I was a woman.
dosent change anything to his contribution in science .
that's sad
@@pleasemakethatface3579 He destroyed Indian scientific progress. Indian scientists taking advice from priest and do religious ceremony, when they send rocket to the Mars. All these things are normalized in India because of him and nobody see the problem there.
@@neeloor2004able yeaa... Low funding.. Making a cheap satellite is seen as achievement and people who are interested in fundamental sciences are pushed in to engineering... Has nothing to do with india being back...
@@neeloor2004able and lol.. Which scientist took advice from priest.?
Thank you bro
We had and have great scientists but very few
Few.....
Today students want to crack JEE NEET and learn problem solving but very few wants to study with investigatory mindset
Few....
Well Explained. Thanks.
❤ really you explained it very nicely. It was a complete information.🙏
Wonderful documentary sir
Next video should be on polarized sunglasses.😎😎😎
Brilliant, thorough video!
Amazing video !!
So nicely clear the topic
Lovely.
where has your Ravishankar gone?
Copyright strike
Great video
Bro please explain how Arguments like intelligent design used to prove god are inadequate.
This is great. I enjoyed our interaction.
We need more videos like this. Bro use a back light to creat contrast from the back ground. You should check out the three point light video setup
Why? Coz the science students best of the best,under air 100 r gonna sit infront of a computer screen in a multi-billion dollar company or gonna go abroad. India needs to spend more on rnd for sure
Veritausium is one great channel to learn about Science,glad you mentioned him.
There is a story Carl Sagan tells in pale blue dot. When the first Mars rover was taking pics of Mars atmosphere, there were bets on the sky color and smart money was on pink. But guess what, the color came out as blue. That was because of the adjustment done by the image processing team who transposed it until it "looked right". It was readjusted and it is pink.
India’s last major science achievement
no bro;
i will prove you wrong
;and yes "I"
@@danishdubey I’m sorry American Indians and Indians immigrated to US and technology borrowed from Russia and people who forsaken Indian citizenship doesn’t count
im in India, Punjab currently with no plans of migratiom
@@danishdubey is that a achievement in science lol
@@theaveragescienceguy8652 i said i will, not have ;
Great video 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👍🏿👨🏿💻👨🏿⚕️👨🏿⚕️
You should talk about George sudarshan.People say that he was deserving a noble prize .
Dr. Sir C. V. Raman is not the only one who received Nobel prize in science. There were two Nobel laureates from India who received their Nobel prizes before India gained independence. The first laureate was Dr. Sir Ronald Ross, who discovered the malarial parasite. He was born in British-ruled India and conducted his research in Calcutta, Secunderabad, and Bangalore. Consequently, India earned its first Nobel prize in science in 1902. The second Nobel prize in science was awarded to Dr. Sir C. V. Raman in 1930, for his work on the Raman effect. Like Dr. Ronald Ross, Dr. Raman was also born in India and conducted his entire research in the country. Both Nobel prizes were awarded to individuals from what was then known as British India.
Since India gained independence, no one from the country has received a Nobel prize in science. However, there have been Nobel laureates of Indian origin who conducted their scientific research mainly in foreign countries, particularly the United States. As a result, their awards were dedicated to the countries they migrated to. In essence, Dr. Sir Ronald Ross remains the first Nobel laureate in science from India.
Beautiful presentation
CV Raman is not only person who won nobel price in science in india. Har Gobind Khorana, Subrahmanyam Chandrasekhar and Venkatraman Ramakrishna also won
I didn't say he's the only person. I said this is the only such scientific work from India. The other scientists u mentioned did their work from the US.
Getting noble is not only the achieving thing , with deu respect for Dr CV Raman, India has produced great scientist , like SN Bose ,Meghnad Saha , Ashoke Sen , many others , the point is No one have did any scientific experiment in India to get a Nobel except Raman , Where the world is experimenting on various projects, India is rejecting INO ,which is depressing. If a person have interest in experimental neutrino physics ,he/she will have to go abroad to reasearch
Considering raylag's elastic scattering
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. In Raman's effect, how is the difference possible?
7:18 one small correction. The total energy in any collision never changes, irrespective of type of collision. In inelastic collision, it is just that some part of the total energy is being lost in the form of heat, sound, (even light) etc. Whereas in an elastic, most of it (even all of it) remains intact (for the lack of better word) i.e. Not lost to other forms!☝️
The energy of the objects involved changes in inelastic
@@scienceisdope perhaps it is better to say that kinetic energy is unchanged in elastic collisions
@@supreetsahu1964 *total energy of involved objects is unchanged
amazing ✌
Informative video.
I don't get it....why would someone dislike this video?? What are those 34 creatures?
Hare krshna 🙏
why did you removed the earlier video you posted?
It got a copyright strike from people who don't understand the concept of fair use.
@@scienceisdope i love your videos btw.
@@scienceisdope it's gonna come back right?
@@Unknown-hi2dr expect it back this week
9 Indians won Nobel prize till now who told you it's one??🤣🤣😂😂
Any sources to read and understand why 1. Electron absorbs electromagnetic radiation and jumps to higher orbital or, emits electromagnetic radiation and jumps to lower orbital, 2. Moving charge produces magnetic field, 3. Accelerating charge emits electromagnetic radiation?
are you kidding me?
@@danishdubey Why would I?
@@danishdubey Ok fine. Only two questions 1. Why moving charges produce magnetic field? 2. Why accelerated charges produce electromagnetic radiation?
@@abhijeettarange4092
Ok;
To be honest i feel electrodynamics is still incomplete;
so there is no established answer for (1) yet ,but there is for (2) ie : since charge by definition has electric field coming out or in; when it is accelerated, it creates an accelerated (changing)electric field around charge. Now as we know from maxwell laws that changing electric field creates changing magnetic field , a magnetic field is created; now heres the catch: varying electric field and magnetic field are capable of producing each other so they self sustain and start propagating(considering no loss of energy) which we see as E.M radiation.
Now for the first one i am actually a researcher and developing a "scientific and mathematical" theory to explain some things; so no answer till then...
btw you seem quite curious since these questions are quite fundamental. Do you want to be a physicist in future or what?
Props to this guy who crashed his car to show us inelastic collision 😂😂
His T shirt and background are 🔵
Please make a video on John hageline on vedas as soon as possible
Can we see/do this effect/change easily at home or at a basic science lab?
3:46, if it so then why not green getting scattered?
1. What will happen if we look the sun by our naked eye from moon?
2. Are all stars white in color like our sun's picture from moon?
3. If yes to 2nd question why do we consider blue stars massive and red stars low mass?
4. Lets say if our sun is replaced by a very massive star that is blue in hertzsprung russel diagram. Then if we would look at it from EARTH will it appear blue or yellow or white??
These are some questions which I couldn't find proper solutions
1. It'll be very bright. If you look for too long, it'll burn your retina. Also the sky will be black.
2. Not all. Red and blue stars (like Rigel, betelguese etc. ) Exist .
3. Mass doesn't have anything to do with colour. Colour is determined by how much energy comes out of a star. There are red and blue coloured massive stars.
4. I'm not sure, but I'm assuming it won't look yellow since it's light spectrum is mostly blue. Also I think the sky will look even more darker blue. Also sunsets with this star will not look orange for sure :)
thr is another one aso which is not recommended ...like Jagdish Bose deserved it ...but he missed it
Please upload your Sri Sri Ravishankar video
What is your diet plan
If sky looks blue because our eyes are more sensitive to it then what about in camera sensors
❤
You never make a video on om swami
Didn't HG khorana get one as well?
The real raman effect is saffronisation of Indian science 🙄. I thought this channel is progressive but now I doubt 🏃🏻
I am judging you but the title feels like India is dumb and noble prize is something that proves someone's intelligence, A VALIDATION
1930 - British India
Har gobind khurana dna research nobel Prize winner
Venki Raman also won the Nobel prize isn't it?
youre seriously rgt abt the money thing dude...i had recently asked my friend what she wanted to pick after 10th...she said science but i knew she was a bit laggy regarding the subject...and when i asked her abt it she just went like " if i pick science and become doctor my future will be set with no problems"......it was kind of heartbreaking to hear that all in the tone she said it...
💓
100th like 😎
You were explaining Raman effect in great way, then suddenly you mess up with explaination. Nobody is perfect in this world. It was fairly good attempt for a first time seeker.
👏🙂
Anna gyaan acha tarika sa smjaa nhi pa rha aap 😌
I thought this channel have matured audience with scientific temperament ,but sadly is filled with andhbhakts.
Dear sir try to speak more clear in english
👍👍👍👍👍
Scattering of light is anti hindu and hence you shouldn't cover this topic!
Bruh what.? U seem illiterate!
Ye to haal h india ka
Ye laynge nobal price 😑
You are anti human bro
@@logicalwords1843 haha 😅
How?
@@logicalwords1843 read the sarcasm bro! This is the most obvious kind I put there! I wonder how you would fare against my not so obvious kind!
❤😂🎉😂😂❤❤😂🎉🎉🎉😂🎉🎉🎉🎉
The only scientific work of India to win a Nobel prize? It is absolutely not true. Nobel is a joke...if it was serious then JC BOSE, Satyandranath Bose, H.J Bhabha etc deserved nobel also.
.
Chakke
Obama got nobel prize for peace.
Most of your videos are targeting Hindus , so other faiths and countries have all scientific , why don't you praise scientific aspects of Hinduism . Like many rituals , festivals , yoga etc ??? Your b ia s doesn't allow it ??
Smart people criticize religion of their own families. Dumb people criticize other religions to feel better.
Your profile and name show that you don't respect others religion then why do you expect someone else to respect your religion
Scientific ritual - best oxymoron there is.
@@simstar6557 correct. That's why we will never see a muslim making videos like this for obvious reaspns
@@Vedsingx 😎😎😎😎😎