Brexit: Rod Liddle and People's Vote's Tom Baldwin on 'betrayal' - BBC Newsnight
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- Three years on from the Brexit vote, the UK is still in the EU.
Subscribe to our channel here: goo.gl/31Q53F
Columnist and author Rod Liddle calls it 'The Great Betrayal' in his new book, while Tom Baldwin from the people's vote says both leavers and remainers have been betrayed in the years since the vote.
Liddle blames the establishment, but Baldwin argues Liddle "is the establishment".
Cambridgeshire Police said no offences had been revealed in its inquiry into bribery and postal votes of the 2019 Peterborough by-election.
Newsnight is the BBC's flagship news and current affairs TV programme - with analysis, debate, exclusives, and robust interviews.
Website: www.bbc.co.uk/...
Twitter: / bbcnewsnight
Facebook: / bbcnewsnight
Go Rod! He is absolutely right in what he's saying. The BBC bias is arrogant in the extreme, they turn the interview into a personal attack on Rod Liddle to deflect from the fact that the British people agree with him.
"The BBC bias is arrogant in the extreme,"...................I think the problem is with you that just like Rod you have a problem with women asking tough questions, she has a job and she did it well. He makes personal attacks in his book so what is the problem questioning him about his own words?
Emily Matlis really is a disgraceful interviewer. Night after night getting hysterical when people dare to disagree with the BBC’s remoaner line
See Maitlis's recent interview with the Labour woman Jess Phillips. What a contrast! - first name terms, then respectfully waiting until Ms Phillips had finished all her answers, etc etc. Then sharing blaming the government (Moslems/LGBT) without any questioning of Phillip's identity politics position. The bias is so blatant especially when you compare Maitlis's interviewing technique on left/right wingers and remainers/brexiteers.
@@peterduff9281 I gave up watching after Paxman left. He was the last vestige of angry impartiality.Gavin Esler was good and contained himself then. It's shite now. When one thinks of the giants of this programme in its past - like Peter Snow and Donald McCormick - they did the job without bigging up themselves
Liddell talking about a documentary alleging racial differences in intelligence. "On average a little under 10 per cent thicker than whites; 15 per cent thicker than east Asians. I thought everyone knew, too. Some argument about cultural bias of tests, but same results come up in US." You’ve chosen to lie down with these people it isn’t bias to quote your own views back to you.
Brexit has forced the quality of available commentators to rock bottom. Perhaps the BBC isn't trying hard enough to get Brexit-supporting interviewees who aren't racists and/or the worst of the gutter press elite. Currently the only people they have who support the Brexit line are idiots, racists, and elitist tax-evaders. I'm sure there are people out there who support Brexit and do not fall into the above category, but currently they receive zero air time. And maybe that's the point - are they boring to listen to?
@@henridobbs2423 what?????
I went back & re-watched the entire David Dimbleby chaired BBC 1 EU ref Election Night Special Results Programme of June 23rd 2016.
I wanted to see how the Establishment reacted in real time, to the apparent shock result.
I also wanted to know if the result was accepted on the night.
Emily Maitlis began talking about another referendum at 10 minutes past 5 in the morning, as she interviewed a panel guest. "..but are we going to need a second referendum..?"
DD had declared it for Leave shortly prior.
Emily Maitlis couldn't even let the result stand for longer than an HOUR.
The Emily Maitlis', the Tom Baldwins ('The Weasels' Vote') *never* had any intention of accepting that they lost.
They've concocted & confected all of this angst. They know it, we know it, yet they really think people are too stupid to understand their engineering.
@Paula Fay It's possible even the engineering has in itself been engineered. We may still be stupidly misunderstanding the engineering in the belief that we do.
@@yetagain5671 Could be yes. I don't rule anything much out after the last three years. I still cannot get over the amount of seemingly intelligient people who scream for a further ref but who did not care that there were no refs from 1975 & indeed our membership of the EU where we became EU citizens overnight - & the Lisbon Treaty, the EU Constitution that reigns supreme over our own unwritten one - all happened without any refs. That is why when people did get a vote in 2016- they damn well voted. Highest turn out on any vote % wise. And they dare to tell us our vote was not legit? Scheming weasels.
@Paula Fay ... Indeed on all counts, but this sort of shenanigans (politically and social engineering) has been going on since time began. Delve into any controversial subject for which there are suspicions of engineering and there will be those that believe the authorities can do no wrong and tell no lies and the rest of us, well, we're the mad ones apparently for just asking questions regarding the unofficial observations.
Still, the internet legitimately or not is undermining the powers that be and their mouthpieces of the MSM and it is a great timeline to be alive.
Specific to Brexit and your observations I think you'll enjoy "Brexit Morons" on Pat Condell's channel. Can't post the link on a BBC channel comments section or this post will be likely shadow banned and you may not see it (now isn't that a surprise from the BBC.....Not).
@@yetagain5671 Pat Condell is great. Where's his channel gone these days?
What's with this? Why can't the BBC have a calm sane discussion about Brexit? It's just nuts.
@Jason Wong Because he constantly has to argue against insane or indoctrinated people who don't talk the same language as someone who thinks for themselves. Love him or hate him, you can't say he is ideologically driven
@Jason Wong Was he invited? And why are you comparing a politician to a broadcasting network? Are you a bit of an idiot?
@Jason Wong 'Sounds like' ... is that really the best you can do, or are you content to allow your inadequacies to trail out behind you for all to see?
@Jason Wong And there's your epitaph.
When you're losing the argument, shout 'racism'.
00ProblemChild
Then the same must apply if you’re a twat....
You’re a twat.......🤣
If racism is present then shout out from the roof tops.
Why is the BBC allowed to still have this here with no mention that they had to apologise to Rod Liddle for this interview? The BBC bias shown here, and Emily Maitlis' bias is unbelievable.
Emily Maitlis demonstrating, yet again, her basic incompetence as an interviewer. She cannot seem to be able to separate her own opinions and emotions from the need to be cool-headed and objective. She was dire in her role of adjudicating the Tory leadership debate; she was objectionable in her interview with an Hungarian politician recently and she tried to trap Geert Wilders, the Dutch politician, in his knowledge of the Bible, thinking he wouldn't know its content from that of the Qur'an. But Wilders discerned, easily, what she was up to. If the BBC wasn't so institutionally wedded to PC ideology and to promoting females regardless of their fitness for the job, Emily would be long gone.
She has Peter Mandelson on speed-dial. That is all you need to know about her neol-liberal credentials.
What a waste of time.
Mr Anglichan
Can’t stand her
Your use of 'females' says an awful lot about You, even more than the nonsense in your post
Deirdre Julia Nash l
Well done for calling out the BBC.
It is becoming a pattern, when someone says it as it is, Brexiteers blame the BBC in the same way they blamed foreigners for the problems of their own making.
Next stop? blaming the EU for brexit not working out?
@@veryconfused5087 Personally I won't be blaming the EU one bit if Brexit is betrayed and falls flat on it's face. Oh no. I'll be laying the blame squarely at the door of where it belongs, at the feet of the self-serving traitorous pieces of human excrement that populate both Parliament and the House of Lords. The people who utterly despise the working class of this country and constantly work to thwart their wishes.
@@johnbowles5399 Well, that is encouraging, thanks for clarifying.
Well yes they are effing it up with the connivance of the remain British Establishment. Why do we need to give lots of money to what should essentially be a trade organization?
@@peterduff9281 There are so many reasons we contribute money to the EU it would be impossible for me to outline them here, but think about this.
Do you think our agriculture and its methods would survive in the world of today without the help from the EU? Or the research we have embarked that is only possible in the context of multiple countries working together?
What about having full access to the biggest trading block in the world? Or what about the flexibility for our businesses to be able to reach bigger challenges thanks to the economics and workforce available??
The EU may be imperfect but is a force for good.
But let's a different angle... it is in our best interest that all the countries in EU are successful so we don't receive big sways of immigration because one thing is clear, if a polish citizen can feed his family in their country, they won't come here at all, they came because they were struggling.
This is something we should remember and if we were to pay attention, it would be good to start looking at Africa and the Middle East and instead of messing around, truly be helpful because it is in our best interest too.
I refuse to watch BBC "NEWS" anymore.....and to be forced to pay for such biased reporting fills me with rage!
The BBC has to go. There is no way people should be forced to pay for this kind of crap.
It is rather ironic that a former Labour Party member(Liddle) is now seeing how mad the left have become(Matlis and the BBC).
alphabetaxenonzzzcat: It is indeed a bit ironic, but you could also call it maturing after a juvenile phase, or changing appropriately to match the changing times and the evolution of the Labour Party into a Marxist cabal that embraces the Moslem vote and the concomitant antisemitism.
@@Maelli535 No I don't think it is "maturing". Rod, like me, is an old style Lefty - and I'm not even that fucking old. Lefties like me and Rod and hundreds of thousands of others on the Left haven't changed - it's the pseudo Left that has changed. It's like the Left has been infected with some sort of political Mad Cow disease. I find it horrifying and tragic. My late father and grandfather must br turning in their graves. "Is this what we fought for !"
TheDativeCase I used to vote green, now it seems I have no choice but to vote for conservatives.
What happened?
@@thedativecase9733 Check out Rod's new party, the resurgent SDP. Centre right on social issues and centre left on economics - what the New Labour movement should have been if it wasn't so obsessed with radicalism.
Wasn’t it just delightful when Boris got an 80 seat majority! Pure bliss
Boris has been the best PM ever so far
@@markjoyeux9110 You are really clever and incisive
@@markjoyeux9110 nailed it, oh wait, he was totally useless and indecisive
This woman is an hysterical mess. What is her role. I thought she was supposed to moderate a debate between the guest. Not to take huge delight in trying to mis characterise, slur and discredit people openly in front of a camera. With a bizarre belief we can not see what she is doing. But the cherry on top of the cake has to be, my taxes (t.v license) pay her more than most NHS medical professionals. I wonder what her daddy did to get her that job.
Bobby Quin Newsnight has been a farcical waste of programming for years. Before Maitlis there was gurning Evan Davis. Even Paxman tried to pass off rudeness and abrasiveness as tough questioning. Don’t bother with this programme or the BBC news.
TisPete
Totally
I thought I killed her in the Korean war , she's still alive
Surprise surprise - she went to Oxford University!
An ugly woman
Please consider cancelling your TV licence. You need one only if you watch or record the scheduled broadcast TV channels on Freeview, Freesat, Sky or Virgin, or if you use the BBC's iPlayer. Watching RUclips, Netflix, Amazon Prime or any other streaming, download or catch-up service does not require a licence. Nor does playing video games or watching blu-rays, DVDs, etc. Please think about what you're funding when you give the BBC money.
Emily Maitlis is a disgrace. Should be fired.
“Grotesque bias”
How exact Rod.
Why is this video not marked up to reflect the fact that the BBC have had to apologise for the presenters attitude towards one of the guests?
BBC bias - Emily Matlis is not an impartial presenter and has shown her bias against those that voted for Brexit. Appalling ! The BBC should be impartial!
BBC bias at its best . Even the graphics behind them is biased, all the leave words are blurred, while the remain is in HD
"you keep saying we call all brexit voters racist! thats not true" then goes on to call Rod racist for 5 mins
and here we are back here again picking up all the duff stuff that this stupid bint has been saying all these years. We remember all these things but we have to come back to clarify it in our heads; she's done this soooooooo many times that we are all surprised she is still sitting in that bloody chair on that now hideous programme.
Rod Liddle is accused of being racist. 17.4 million voters are not.
Look at the background. Subliminal advertising. The word remain is much more obvious than the word LEAVE.
Wow what a pathetic dickhead you are
God, I sympathise with Liddle. This looks exhausting
@Paul Nolan OK
@Paul Nolan Great "argument" there, and certainly didn't make you look like a hypocrite for inciting any violence....
@Paul Nolan dont incite violence mate. Remain lost. its democracy.
@@davidjonmoxleyskipp230 Maybe a Pissed off Remoaner? They are like crybabies having a hissyfit."
" I am being ignored !! I need the EU dummy EU to feed me and change my nappies." EU! EU! EU !!bwaa bwaaaaaaaa he he .........fart burp.
Paul Nolan kinder, gentler.
"Go on Tom", your turn to smack him. What a biased platform this "public service broadcaster" is.
Yeah, it was a rubbish interview, and Maitlis has really let herself down. Her sneering tone, and her assasination attempt on Liddle was appalling. But it is also true that she has revealed the BBC’s bias, as clear as day. Like him or loathe him, Liddle performs a vital role in challenging orthodoxy.
Frenchie jones, you may do, but the BBC is supposed to be impartial would you believe it
I am so disappointed and yet so relieved with this programme. This segment will stand as a typical example of the institutional bias of the Dedicated EU loving BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Conspiracy) continual onslaught on the half of Britain’s population which it refuses to represent again and again and again.
On behalf of the British public (who pay for this biased broadcasting company ) we would like to apologise to you, that view this, for the biased, rude interviewer... it's a shame the powers to be at the BBC do not read the comments below to understand how we feel about the service they provide and we pay for...
Emily, was the voter fraud in Peterborough primarily amongst the Pakistani community? Liddle’s comments indicate he thinks that to be the case. Yet you didn’t make any attempt to investigate whether there was evidence that his point was factual. You ignored him when he named the Pakistani perpetrator involved. Merely Identifying the primary group(s), regardless of whether the identification may be true, is racist according the BBC, which is why so many are exasperated by the BBC - all of the employees of which are paid via a BBC flat tax, which the vast majority of the employees hypocritically and ironically abhor. Why not look into that theme for a new BBC comedy?
Has Emily’s liver packed up ? She is going more yellow by the day .
I hope it's something serious.
jmascisss
Disgusting comment, Jmasciss.
I can’t take her politics and interviewing stance any more than you can, but to wish illness on her?
She is disgusting. Don’t get me wrong.
@@written12 You can't wish an illness on somebody. Witches were killed off in the middle ages. Whether you wish it or not, she does not look healthy. Are you going to tell me she looks healthy?
@Boris Farage Oh I get it... you're a lefty. You like like to speak on behalf of the whole country. A little bit sad and a little bit pathetic. Let me tell you a little secret... The rest of the country have opinions of their own.
The BBC had to apologise for this
What has happened to interviewers just interviewing rather than inserting their beliefs into the debate. Emily maitliss seems unable to do the role she has been employed to do, not for the first time.in a time where people do not trust the media because of supposed bias she gives that view credence
Spartacus Forlife Maitlis read his own words back to him, how was she 'inserting her beliefs'?
@@desmondroberts6034 she read his own words back to him? You mean she took a sentence from a book without context. Ron liddle looks at things from his working class roots. He uses rough words and dark humour. In essence he is a cynic. He certainly isn't a racist as much as some people would like to class him in that role. Liddle is an educated working class man who see's much of the middle class in a clear light. That light being that the working class are there to be managed and that they should be grateful for what liberal middle class people do for them. As for her technique she used " i" from the outset go listen to the interview again
I don't want to get dragged into a BBC bias argument but I do know that Emily maitliss is a well known Remainer and shows it in her interviews. There's all this talk of MPs can't decide and therefore there should be a second referendum, funny how it's only Remainers calling for this second vote but not surprising as it will be heavily biased towards Remain. But the reason MPs can't decide is because the majority are Remainers who won't accept the Referendum result, despite the vast majority voting for the referendum in the first place and also for Article 50.
"the reason MPs can't decide is because the majority are Remainers who won't accept the Referendum result" - Each time May put her deal to parliament, if all Tory MPs including all the ERG had voted for it we would have left already. Brexiteers have been blocking us leaving too.
deesstuary Leavers have failed to agree and describe any credible Brexit strategy. It is their failing and Remainers should not be blamed - particularly as they warned that no good Brexit could be delivered.
The bbc fails to mention the fact that it accepts funding from the eu, and in exchange agrees never to criticise any aspect of the franco german reich
@@thomaspaine2243 LMAO!! Do you have any proof of these absurd claims? The BBC nets £4.9bn from the UK Goverment's licence fee, what is EU funding for comparison?
@@thomaspaine2243 Can you provide a link to this agreement as I would be interested to read it?
Emily Maitlis' shameless attempt to turn a Brexit debate into a personal attack on Rod Liddle, simply confirms he is right about BBC bias.
Rod Liddle is a **** and any personal attack on him is fine by me.
Rod is a corporate hack working for murdoch.
@@geoffpoole483 So because you disagree with his political and social views you condone personal attacks on him? Maturity not your strong point I take it?
@@johnbowles5399 Yeah, I don't hear any counter-argument to any of Rod's points, just frothing remoaners name-calling. Very telling indeed.
THEY LIVE. OBEY. YOU WILL NEVER BE ALLOWED TO LEAVE, UNTIL WE SAY YOU CAN. EXTENSION UPON EXTENSION UNTIL A NEW REFERENDUM.
When you’re losing the argument leap to the racist accusation. It must be in the BBC’s interviewer’s manual. Pathetic.
Free Tommy Robinson
@@patriciasutcliffe7094 It was racist, that you can't deny.
@@patriciasutcliffe7094 Tommy who?
@@veryconfused5087 Was it a racist statement? Perhaps. Was it a true statement? Definitely. Complicated isn't it?
@@patriciasutcliffe7094 Tommy who?
The BBC has since apologised for the bias in this interview. However, it does not feel any need to mention this in its description above.
End the licence fee for the Bias Broadcasting Corporation.
I'm genuinely stunned... And to think for some years I'd defended the notion that the BBC wasn't biased. Shameful performance from Matlis.
migration must be controlled and suitable to the nation needs 😉 also only people with a proven good character should be allowed in UK .....criminals records must be prior checked 😈
MUH RACIST!!!!!!!!!
We are finally leaving. The real voice and people have spoken and they are unchallengable. Fook the EU.
fucking love how he just called her out
love ittttt
Hes a moron, much like yourself.
Maitlis must have had one hell of a bet on the democratic vote being overturned - she's getting more and more frantic in every interview.
Rod Liddle is a legend. He calls a spade a spade and the vast majority of sane people are thankful he exists and is a voice of sanity in a cacophony of lunacy
" the vast majority of sane people are thankful".........................How do you know this, did you pol the vast majority of the people?
"Brexit hasn't been a problem" (Liddle). That sums up this nonsense. And paid richly by the globalist Murdoch.
Rod Little ahead of his time here. Nine months later....
Thank God for Rod.
Why would your "god" care about Rod?
I'm amazed that the comments are turned on for this, encouraged but amazed.
The deliberate view of bias on this and many shows is what should make the BBC forfeit their Royal Charter and have their public broadcaster status revoked.
Competing in the free market would force a minimum of cross sectional views, and at best create a nonpartisan field.
Either way BBC fee is daylight robbery. Earn a voluntary subscription base of viewers or rely on advertising
The fact she kept her job after this shows the BBC is not a serious news organisation anymore. 30 years ago this programme would have been cut short for such appalling biased behaviour from a journalist.
The BBC seriously need to sack Emily and let her work for an openly far left news organisation
One day soon Laurence Fox will come along and put people like Matlis in their place. The tide has turned.
DON'T PAY THE BBC TAX
Tom Baldwins arrogance deserves a prize.We voted to leave.A pro remain PM and a pro remain parliament have done everything to stop us leaving.The sneering nasty contempt to leave voters from Baldwin and the dreadful BBC mouthpiece Matlis stinks.Good on Rod Liddle for calling out BBC bias on live TV.Hope his book is a bestseller.
Love Mr. Liddle.
All you do is write about suicide bombers? That's all he does? What a weird thing to say
coming from the people that have a pop concert to celebrate little girls being exploded and then who make ''Don't look back in anger'' the official song of the massacre! they represent a repulsive out of touch elite society who have the gaul to think they are somehow morally superior? its beggars belief?
Appealing to emotion and ad hominem. The last ditch effort to win an argument by those who don't have one.
Rod is right.
Emily’s fake tan is totally culturally appropriate!!
State of the BBC. Maitless crystallises everything that is rotten with the Corporation.
The BBC aren't doing themselves many favours. Maybe the guy is a racist, I don't know, but the ad hominems don't contribute the the conversation. When you only have a 10 minute segment you better stay on topic, rather than more pointless, devisive noise.
BBC did a number on Corbyn too...
"Who wrote that article about Roy Keane? I'll tell ya who it was it was Rod Liddle, Rod Liddle.... sure he's the guy who ran away on his wife and left her for a young one" - Eamonn Dunphy 2005
"The topic" is (in the BBC's eyes) to humiliate or beat into submission any Brexit supporter that comes on their show.
He’s not a rascist.
Suggest that if the People wish to know something about Brexit, they look at "A Different Bias".
Good political analysis without the BBC bias.
It slways makes me laugh when anyone working for the bbc takes the moral high ground
Looking at Tom Baldwin, it's quite possible that he was the first UK Covid 19 case.
And this is one of the main reasons the bbc is roundly despised and in the process of losing the license fee.
Outrageous bias shown here! Maitlis is calm, quiet and respectful when the remoaner speaks, and then attacks Rod with a character assassination whenever he speaks. And according to a quick search, we (the TV-tax payers) pay her enough money to buy a new house each and every year:
"In 2019, Maitlis was amongst the highest paid BBC news and current affairs staff, receiving a salary between £260,000-£264,999." And last year she was paid £325,000!!!
She does a bad job and gets paid even more (of our) money!
Emily Witless.
Good to see Emily using the “so what your saying” technique from Channel 4. Liddle’s comments are not racist and they simply do not understand humour. This discussion represents the divide in the UK between people like Matlis and the majority.
£200,000 a year to listen to her style of Interviewing.
Not from my money. I’ve opted out.
@Jason Wong
If he were a liar , it would mean he was being paid by his readers to lie to them. The BBC's lies are funded by Peter to lie to Paul, that is another kettle of fish.
@Jason Wong Ròn Ladle? Wit at it's best. How's about (copyright JS) Basin Wrong?
The BBC is going to start charging £5.99 a month for something called Britbox! Are the taking the piss or what?
as a former remainer this interview is disgusting i can see why the right was p*ssed
Why was it pissed, all she did was quote stuff he wrote
Is this the interview that Maitlis had to apologise to Rod Liddle?
Isn't hindsight wonderful, the BBC'S days are numbered, the sooner the better !!!!!
Well here we are, 31st December 2020, and we are fully out at 23:00.
Since this interview the Tories won a stonking majority on the back of the promise to leave the EU.
Where did it all go wrong Emily? ( In this interview 5:27) You can't wait to deliberately misunderstand people, call the racists and xenophobes. At 8:23 you give a half arsed nod to balance. Bravo.
Is she worth paying £220,000-£229,999 a year? That's a huge amount of money for what exactly?
That's £105 an hour Now I can think of circumstances where I would pay her £105 and hour.
Zelda from the Terrahawkes works for the BBC now.
let's have the best of 5 Referendums 😂😂
@Gabbe Gubbe Yes I can't believe that they want another referendum as there is a very good chance they may lose again.
Maitlis really showing her true colours here
Well Tom, I'm delighted to say it did eventually go back to the people and you and your ilk got a very firm response to the self-serving lies and bollocks you'd been spouting ever since the original referendum.
Where is the 'fact check' marker on this video - the usual tag team tactics where the host teams up with one side against the other. BBC actually apologiesd over this.
This is completely hysterical. And I love his question, 'Don't you know what comedy is?' they were ticking a box ordering bhajis or curry.... Yes.. it IS funny and its not racist... You could say they were ticking a box ordering Kentucky Fried o ar Big Mac and that would be funny too... this interview is hilarious.
remainers happy with no democracy, boris will be a legit target if he does,nt deliver.
The BBC make CNN look professional.
Tom Baldwin making out that remainers feel betrayed when even though the majority voted to leave, remain has had its way for three years and more, and here we are on the BBC championing the right to remain.
they have no right to feel betrayed they lost! the policy should go against them!
2 more TV licence fee payers leaving... they say they are a British public funded company... they are embarrassing
another nail in the bbc coffin they wont last much longer
I do hope you are right, but I doubt it.
Its boris and his racist supporters which will soon be gone
@@rammiel9404 So now anybody who supports Boris Johnson is racist? Are they now all lumped in with all the 'nasty racist thick little Englanders' who voted Leave 3yrs ago? Do you have any idea how simplistic and childish your worldview is? Here's a life tip, and bare in mind that this may come as a shock to you, not everyone shares the same points of view in life or have the same political opinions. I know, shocking isn't it?
She couldn't defeat his argument, so she dug up articles and make out of context arguments from articles written 5 years ago to defame him. Pathetic!
I'm not naming any names here but when you are starting to look like one of the Mummies out of the old Brendan Fraser films, maybe it's time to stop dressing like Scarlett Johansson.
Says the guy hiding his face
@@rammiel9404 Aren't WE all ?
@@wasabimanic yes but im not the one insulting someones looks.
@@rammiel9404 That's laudable Really. Just pathetic how people have been attacking the POTUS in just that way too hey?
Errm they are proving his point about the accusations of racism.
give them more democracy, we had the fcking vote, a 2nd vote is what a dictator will do.
The BBC issued an apology regarding Emily Maitlis' bias in this edition of the 'Emily Maitlis show' yet somehow this clip is still available on RUclips with no reference to this fact. Clearly the BBC no longer take their impartiality guidelines seriously, this and many other factors are contributing to the organisation's rapid demise. It's sad really.
"Democracy has spoken". What did it say?
It's interesting watching this in January 2020 after the recent general election. I love the line from Tom Baldwin "be a democrat" (directed at Rod Liddle) re. having a second referendum. What a hypocrite. And, the presenter. She couldn't resist throwing the racism card at Rod Liddle. It appears to me they have coordinated their attack against him. Also, presenters/Interviewers should keep their emotions out of it.
rod is right the b b c are the most bias of the lot
Thank you Mr Liddle. Most of us are enraged at the Beebs new multiculi liberal agenda. I used to vote Labour before all this nonsense. The Beeb got the worst out of Liddle here, listen to his LBC interview with Iain Dale and you'll see a much better representation.
@Qwfwq66 Do you know what bigot means?
@Qwfwq66 Anyone who doesn't agree with your warped ideology is a bigot?! If you can't see this interview was nothing more than an attempted character assassination then YOU are the bigot, an extremely blinkered & brainwashed one at that.
Go Rod...!!!
Emily Maitlis should have lost her position over this.
It's like watching a poor pastiche of a female Piers Morgan insulting a guest into submission.
Newsnight used to be better than this.
Of course its always the bias bbc putting a twist on things. Never blame the haters. The hated deserve what is coming to them. Its their fault and the bbc should be pointing that out instead.
I like Ron liddle. He makes forays onto ground that many writers, journalists and others avoid like the plague. He looks at things from his working class roots and shows his disdain for the establishment and the politically correct , middle class media types. He is correct in his assumption that working class voters were classed as thick and racist , during and after the Brexit vote. The stupidity of it is that Brexit broke fairly evenly between the various classes. He uses humour ,on many occasions , to describe situations. Sometimes coarse, sometimes sarcastic, sometimes near the knuckle but always with honesty. He disdains political correctness or that sort of correctness which straightjackets off colour humour nearly all people use amongst friends. He disdains a liberal media, wrapped in their own bubble of self congratulatory smugness. Long may he continue to comment
Two against one as usual, Biased Broadcasting Company again, axe the License Fee now.....
You will go back to the polls time and time again until you get the right answer.
Betrayal? Leaver's didn't know what they were voting for. Government hasn't told them yet. So how can it be a betrayal???
David Cameron, the Prime Minister at the time, set out what would happen if we voted to leave: Article 50 would be triggered, which would give us two years to do a deal with the EU. If that didn't happen, then we would trade on WTO terms until a deal was done. He said all of this on the highest rated politics show in the UK, the Andrew Marr show.
This is also what the text of Article 50 says, which the majority of MPs voted for. 'The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that,two years after the notification.' In other words, all of the MPs who voted to trigger Article 50 - which is the majority of them - voted for No Deal at the end of two years.
So anyone who says we didn't know what we were voting doesn't know what they're talking about or is a liar.
@@danieljohnson7457 This of course assumes that voters shared that knowledge. They didn't. In any case it misses the point that the brexit discussion was not limited to the formal proposal not is the enactment of brexit, whatever that might mean, restricted by it. One of the formal aspects of brexit most often ignored is the advisory status of the referendum. Most voters were not aware of that not least because of promises the PM was not actually justified in making. Just this week Farage claimed in a brexit party broadcast 'this is not the brexit you voted for'. He assumes therefore that there are multiple brexits on offer, this particular offer is not the one people voted for and that this differentiation is possible because people knew they were voting for something different. If this doesn't involve the knowledge claim then it is difficult to see how Farage can secure any warranty for his claim that this is not the brexit people voted for. If you think there is an alternative route he might take, what is it?
@@stuartparker8926 You're missing the point. The legal process for leaving the EU is: we trigger article 50, then we have two years to agree a withdrawal agreement or we exit by default. This was well known at the time and set out by the government. Leavers knew this although you're right that remainers might not have as they tend to be ill- informed about all things EU.
Daniel Johnson You adopt the pose so beloved of leavers: claiming to speak on behalf of all of them while making sweeping and false generalisations about remainers which amount to nothing but pointless insult. Your response actually contains the elements which justify my original point since you acknowledge an either/or which voters were not in a position to resolve. In the Brexit party broadcast Farage also assumed the knowledge requirement by telling voters "this is not the Brexit you voted for" thereby claiming that voters know they voted for something else. Only problem with that is that he is in no position to make that assertion though it doesn't prevent him from feeling he can speak for all leavers. I am not saying that leave voters were ill informed or stupid. I am saying that they couldn't know what they were voting for because nothing was available for them to know and won't be until a Brexit is distilled from the range if possible Brexits. But, something you may have missed, this will take place no earlier that 2019. The voters needed that knowledge in 2016. In 2016 it wasn't available.
@@stuartparker8926 It was you started out by saying 'Leavers didn't know what they were voting for' and assumed to speak for us. And now you're doing it again in this comment, by saying i'm 'adopting the pose so beloved of leavers.'