Imagine if at the end of inception Leonardo decaprio thought he was in a dream because the top never stopped but in reality it turns out that someone had replaced his top with this battery powered one.
Your RUclips channel may be the most brilliant in all of RUclips. Your videos are amongst the most fascinating, while at the same time the ideas are shown, and filmed, in such clear and simple ways. You have a very special talent in this regard. Thanks so much for continuing to make your amazing content.
@@anonamemous6865 I once wondered about this too. It's mostly flat, because for some reason 3d things collapsing due to gravity tend to collapse in 1 dimension first. One example of something in a clearly different plane is Pluto, but its plane of rotation is just angled somewhat from the rest of the planets.
This was one of the most fascinating discussions of angular momentum I've ever seen. I loved how you took a simple example of a spinning top to explain conservation and then extended it to the net angular momentum of the universe
There is a real way to find out if you're dreaming. It's called reality checks. What you do is ask yourself these questions: "am I dreaming?" Do a few teste to see like counting your fingers, trying to breathe through a plugged nose, reading and/or looking at time and then looking away to see if it changes. The other question: "How did I get here?" Try to remember when you woke up and retrace your steps on how you got where you currently are. If you can't you're in a dream. After all this is done, if it turns out you're nit dreaming ask yourself what you would do if it was a dream. Doing these daily consistently and keeping a dream journal basically guarantees a lucid dream. Lucid dreaming is an incredible skill so many people are missing out on but anyone can learn
I also heard, that try look yourself from mirror. Mirrors show weird stuff in dream I once looked mirror in the dream (accidently, I wasn't controllling dream) and my eyes had black triangles, I realized immediatly that I was in a dream.
Isn’t 15,000 galaxies way way way too small of a sample size to be close to get an accurate assessment? I’m not sure why the universe would need angular momentum when that small of a percentage could just be chances or odds of what they measured. Not to mention we don’t even know how many galaxies are beyond the observable universe
Yeah I don't know. I would like to know if those researchers took into consideration the statistical assumption they were making but 7% is not that much and 15.000 is a very very very small sample. Also I think there could be a lot more places of concentration of angular momentum, not only individual galaxies, also the clusters and super clusters could and probably are spinning in some way but it is completely undetectable
Plus the added variables of black holes, gravity of the galaxy suns, planets etc. Everything needs to be included to get a proper picture of how things work.
@@liu3chan my comment meant once your dead, because death is a break in continuity Even still humans aren't sh*t in the grand scheme of everything ever Gl
Except we can't conclude that more of the universe is spinning in one direction than the other because we are limited by the distance that we can observe (the observable universe) so it might actually be 50/50, or way off from that.
I wonder if the actual paper he cited discusses the sampling error possibility? Statistics is strong enough to say that the likelihood of their proportion representing the whole universe is more than 95% or even 99%, if they've sampled well enough.
but things falling towards a gravitational source are following a gravity point that is lagged from the actual moving thing, they will always hit off-center and impart a angular momentum.... Only if everything was exactly still in the universe would they hit on-center, but then they will impart a linear momentum, which will cause them to move, and subsequent collisions happen off-center. There is no initial torque in the universe.
@@Nekzuris Answering the frame of reference question is important. In a single telescope view, you could use an "as seen by the observer" reference. Galaxies that are not exactly edge on can be assigned into "left" and "right" bins. But if you take an image in exactly the opposite direction, do you invert the "left" and "right" categories? At any viewing angle between them, do you also try to compensate?
I have two main thoughts on this subject: the first one is that we are always limited in our field of view of the universe by the speed of light and therefore we have no way of knowing whether more will be revealed once that light has gotten to us and/or our instruments for measuring it have gotten better and the second one is much more absurd and, if you've live as long as I have, you realize that the absurd is often reality and that is that perhaps this explains why so many humans and animals are right-handed/pawed. Observe your own cat, dog, and/or other mammal to observe that they have at least a slight predominance toward being right-handed/pawed.
"The Water is applying torque to the ball." More like the the center of mass is ofset to the balance point or the center of buoyancy and gravity is using this distance as a "lever" to apply the torque.
Yeah, that statement didn't sit right with me either. I guess he was trying to simplify things...but he shouldn't have stated it this way just for arguments sake.
@@F_L_U_X the video is a bit too over simplified. Is is the rotation of the motor that induces a rotation in the opposite direction or is it some gyroscopic effect similar to that spinning ball that spins faster when you shake it? The explanation is so over simplified that I don't understand it anymore.
yeah, and actually i still do not understand how is the top sustaining the spin. It cannot utilize gravity in the same way because its spinning axis is fairly accurately vertical.
It’s possible that while the OBSERVABLE universe has net angular momentum, parts of the universe far enough away to be beyond the horizon of what we can see might have the opposite angular momentum.
@@sawik5 it’s not a good comment. It’s wishful thinking. Circular reasoning… SETI has been listening to the universe since 1984 (other work was going on for nearly 90 years before it) and they’ve come up with: nothing. Oh it’s out there we just need to keep listening… the problem is compounding, the more you listen, nothing is heard… same with peering to the “edge” of the galaxy… yet there is more and more out there. “Just given more time we’ll find something.” No, they will not. Our universe is elegantly designed. Evidence of design is all around. DNA is the greatest/most complex computer code… bill gates said something along this.
@@snteevveetns yeah dude, in my original comment i agreed with the actual reasoning value and quality of the comment, it's nothing about aliens, nothing about keeping looking, its just a factual statement that this angular momentum might be local to our local observable universe which has a definitive border, and I know we will never find other data. Your comment is valid but just seems kinda like not really on the subject we were talking about. Tho, I get you man, sometimes i also got wrongly triggered with normal stuff after some too long sesh with some "belivers" or other antivaccers. It's easy to get paranoid, It's just we are not spreading any misinformation, just pointing out a valid thing that was missed in the video. However I do see how in wrong hands this argument could be turned around and used by crazy people for screaming "Aliens!!!", i just hope there are none here xd.
Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather.
Correction: It's not that the top won't fall if in someone's dream. It's that Leo is the only person who knows HOW it falls. I've always felt the end of this movie was misleading, but the "feel" of the item being what's important is supported by another character's totem being a die. That character won't even let someone else hold it, because they may sense how the die is weighted. And Leo always makes sure to pick up his totem if someone walks in while it's spinning so that they can't see how it falls.
Great episode. I'd like to hear more about the 7% galactic rotation direction difference. Did that study include rotation speed, galactic mass and dark energy?
Same. I am curious to know of potential errors and “missing” knowledge. For example, we cannot account for the galaxies that we cannot see due to being blocked by the plane of our own galaxy.
just flipping the galaxies over changes their spin direction... doesn't mean that there was more torque in one direction, they've have billions of years to flip over and be in different alignment than their first inception.
I think the study is flawed since 1) they are seeing galaxies at different times (some of them are too far away that they could have been extinguished), 2) the sample size is insignificant compared to the number of galaxies (at the same time) in the whole universe.
Wow! That is such a cool gadget. Nice video, I enjoyed it. I’ve been subbed for a while now, and I’ve learned a lot. Thank you, you never fail to make my day.
Great timing! Apparently, recently earth's rotation has sped up even though our moon is constantly slowing us down. One hypothesis is that the wobble may have evened out like what we see at the beginning of the video.
I thought it was a funny idea to see what happens when I pray it happen. So I spoke to it like Jesus did the universe, and bam the earth is spinning faster.
@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 Stephen Colbert says it was because everybody pulled their arms in close to their body like when we're spinning on a office chair.. lol.
@@shanibres i have checked their channel and i cant find any way to purchase it there. no links other than a broken link to an old kickstarter page on one of their videos
15,158 is too small a sample size out of hundreds of billions in the visible universe, it's entirely possible that LOCALLY there are more clockwise spinning galaxies while there are more counter-clockwise spinning galaxies in another region.
Exactly, so what he's saying is that in the "Observable Universe" there's more left handed spinning galaxies but I'm w/ you on the sample size..... That's like looking at 1 grain of sand and determining that all sand is that size and shape whenever we haven't even been on another beach or taken a single step away from the spot we're standing on.
I like your point about the "torque of the Universe" ; the way I personally see it, it's one of these fundamental imbalances we need to investigate, like for example why there was more matter than antimatter. Perhaps these two are related somehow? If they annihilated in an asymmetric manner, it could explain the torque "from the inside", without any need for external forces?
The reason the top stops in Inception is because his is special, it's made to stop on purpose, but he'll know he's in a dream because the dreamers conscious would not know the difference between a normal top and his special top. So in the dream, his top will keep spinning like any other top.
For me this is the coolest experiment until now on this channel! Always wanderd about inertia mystery! This gives some answers but also new questions! For shure something to think about more. Keep going Mr Action Lab, you are the best!
Even though it is often said that "The Universe is Isotropic and Homogeneous," it obviously is not. And that indicates it's initial condition was not, or there had to be a cause to bring about a change in state to account for the irregularities in the Universe.
It's isotropic and homogenous at big enough scales. It's similar to how water is isotropic and homogenous, even though it's made out of very dense atoms. Your correct that there needs to be some small initial instabilities for galaxies to form, and I believe thise can actually be explained by quantum mechanics.
I looked at several comments and didn't see an answer. If I look at a galaxy this way, it's spinning that way, and if I look the other way, it's turning another way. I don't understand how we can say the majority are spinning a certain way when there is no at-rest position.
I'd love to see a graph of summed up angular momentum of galaxies in relation to z-score i.e. redshift - does it even out the further we look or does it stay roughly the same? I hope those scientist accounted for mass of the galaxies and not summed only their number.
With their "arms" aligned the same way, you can look for it at the example in the video at 5:01, with the video paused, both look the same but when you press play again you will notice.
@@hugofco2037 but if you were on the other side of the galaxy, it would be spinning in the opposite direction. Since there's no up and down in space, what frame-of-reference do we use?
Wouldn't you also have to account for differences in the mass of each galaxy? If the left hand rotating galaxies are les massive then wouldn't it make sense that there would be more of them?
Also, how certain are we that the sample taken for analysis accurately represents the rest of the universe? Maybe we're in a localized pocket where there are more of one kind than the other and the JWST will reveal others we haven't been able to see before.
@@chdcris If I remember correctly 15000 galaxies is about 1/1000 % of the total amount of galaxies that we can see, let alone the amount of galaxies that there actually are. If the study was truly conducted as presented in this video, it's a useless study with bogus conclusions.
This topic is strong evidence of the Creator's existence, because randomness like the Big Bang does not create an accurate cosmic system, and thank you very much for your effort and explanation on various topics. I learned a lot from you
@@jaredhouston4223 _"Did you just take offence to something factual?"_ Nope but it sure sounds like you did. "OMG! they had the audacity to begin studying cosmology without waiting for FTL with hypergalactic range exceeding 13Gly, then they could just drive there and look and not be lying to everybody all the time!" "Flawed" is comparative word. Usually used as a pejorative. *_Nothing_* is perfect. "Best possible" isn't perfect.. If 'best possible' = flawed to you, then you're in for a long, boring, sad, life rejecting knowledge..
@@Dr_Wrong The study is flawed, your emotions are getting the better of you. I'm allowed to disagree with the the study, it's healthy for the process. However, if you're implying that I'm discrediting the work to even bring up the problem, you don't have to continue to argue with me. The work that has been done is greatly appreciated.
If you have energy inside you can trade one speed for another. Like what satellites do with reaction wheels. So you could be inside a non-rotating container and use an engine to spin something you have thus generating a reaction force on the container making it begin to rotate. Likely what happened in the first pico-seconds of the big bang. (if there was a big bang, not so likely now!)
@@westonding8953 but why would the galaxies in our plane be so special as to spin in the opposite direction of all other galaxies? They should most likely show the same distribution of angular distribution as the rest of the universe
@@schmarcel4238 There is the "Axis of Evil" which he explains in another video. That is unexplained. This could possibly be involved in that. They totally could have a different distribution of angular momentum.
If the universe is infinite there should be areas with higher or lower gradients of left or right angular momentum. Not only was their sample size small, it was focused on a portion of our presentation of the universe. This could be like looking at one country to get an average for skin color instead of the whole planet.
"No we are not in a dream." Bullshit. Eliphalet Oram Lyte published a scientific paper in 1852 conclusively proving otherwise. If you'd taken the time to do your research before spreading this misinformation, you would have found his seminal proof on the simulation hypothesis. But I guess it's up to others to do your legwork for you, and I'll give you this, this one time only so you can find it in your university library. The title of the work is "Row, Row, Row Your Boat," and it proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that "life is but a dream." Damn the lengths I have to go to bring some sense into the world . . .
I feel that the sample of galaxies was too small to draw meaningful conclusions when considered as a percentage of the total number of galaxies in the known universe.
That's cool! :D Too bad you can't buy this thing anywhere. There's a gadget called "limbo" somewhere, but that's a kickstarter thing where you have to pre-order and wait a year...
Scam/ comment ad warning. Please don't fall for the comment and replies above. Its a scammy marketing strategy in which the main goal is to create fake hype for the product they're trying to sell and by redirecting you to their own brand as if it's unique, when there are actually millions of other brands selling the same thing.
All existential issues got “solved” for me when i realized any of these issues also apply to whatever universe is being supposed to be outside of ours.
There is absolutely no evidence that separate universes exist, and no evidence saying they don't. You may be thinking of the multiverse theory, which describes infinite quanta of our own universe, collapsing under observation, but those are all part and parcel of the one universe we live in, and is only a theory anyways.
Imagine if at the end of inception Leonardo decaprio thought he was in a dream because the top never stopped but in reality it turns out that someone had replaced his top with this battery powered one.
At least that would be an end
Then 1st thing he wud hav probably done was, to find and shoot every Free energy youtuber
So that he dies and wake up.
Plot twist: top was replaced with battery powered one within his dream.
But he would realize it weighs different because he is supposed to know the weight of it
Blast 😎 we're not even in a cute matrix or dream world, but inception is a great movie 🍿
Your RUclips channel may be the most brilliant in all of RUclips. Your videos are amongst the most fascinating, while at the same time the ideas are shown, and filmed, in such clear and simple ways. You have a very special talent in this regard. Thanks so much for continuing to make your amazing content.
Thanks for giving more and more knowledge everyday man 👍🙂
do you know where can I get the top in the video?
1:32 Minute error but the torque applied to the ball isn't at the center of the sphere but at the point of contact with the ground.
you are correct
@@TheActionLabHi is our galaxy rotation flat or is it 3d?
The reason the ball will roll, even if you push at the center is that the table/ground resists your push, applying a second torque at the bottom.
@@anonamemous6865 I once wondered about this too. It's mostly flat, because for some reason 3d things collapsing due to gravity tend to collapse in 1 dimension first. One example of something in a clearly different plane is Pluto, but its plane of rotation is just angled somewhat from the rest of the planets.
@@TheActionLab Where can I buy this top?
I WANT IT
This was one of the most fascinating discussions of angular momentum I've ever seen. I loved how you took a simple example of a spinning top to explain conservation and then extended it to the net angular momentum of the universe
When 'Life could be dream' comes true
Tuuuuuuu ruuuuuuu Tu tut Tu ruuuuu
Sh-boom, if I could take you to a paradise up above
If you would tell me I'm the only one that you lo-ove
There is a real way to find out if you're dreaming. It's called reality checks.
What you do is ask yourself these questions: "am I dreaming?" Do a few teste to see like counting your fingers, trying to breathe through a plugged nose, reading and/or looking at time and then looking away to see if it changes.
The other question: "How did I get here?" Try to remember when you woke up and retrace your steps on how you got where you currently are. If you can't you're in a dream.
After all this is done, if it turns out you're nit dreaming ask yourself what you would do if it was a dream.
Doing these daily consistently and keeping a dream journal basically guarantees a lucid dream. Lucid dreaming is an incredible skill so many people are missing out on but anyone can learn
How can we authentically learn it?
I also heard, that try look yourself from mirror. Mirrors show weird stuff in dream I once looked mirror in the dream (accidently, I wasn't controllling dream) and my eyes had black triangles, I realized immediatly that I was in a dream.
you should check out explore lucid dreaming, it has a lot of tips on stuff like that (also it’s belugas old channel if you watch him haha)
I always dream lucid, it's the best thing there is. But it'll always be just a dream..
I think if you have to wonder if you're dreaming you're most likely dreaming lol
Isn’t 15,000 galaxies way way way too small of a sample size to be close to get an accurate assessment? I’m not sure why the universe would need angular momentum when that small of a percentage could just be chances or odds of what they measured.
Not to mention we don’t even know how many galaxies are beyond the observable universe
Yeah I don't know. I would like to know if those researchers took into consideration the statistical assumption they were making but 7% is not that much and 15.000 is a very very very small sample. Also I think there could be a lot more places of concentration of angular momentum, not only individual galaxies, also the clusters and super clusters could and probably are spinning in some way but it is completely undetectable
Not even remotely close to a good sample size. That's less than 0.000015% of the low estimate of galaxies.
Plus the added variables of black holes, gravity of the galaxy suns, planets etc. Everything needs to be included to get a proper picture of how things work.
The universe is identical in every direction so it might just be a big enough sample
Yeah that's what I thought
the vacuum chamber gets a cameo in every Action lab video
This is the same principle used in spacecraft to allow them to rotate without using fuel
They look a bit differently but yea, reaction wheels.
Some have seen and described unknown craft that actually look this.
So... You could rephrase it as: Spaceships vibe out in space to maneuver.
I like the mental image that this conjures, as imprecise as it may be.
No. There's nothing in space to provide the friction. It's a slightly different mechanism.
@Makes me wonder Alot of spacecraft use gravity as its source of friction.
Thanks if I was not already experiencing enough existential dread about the nature of reality already LOL
There are galaxies that we will never see because they are blocked by the view of our own galaxy.
Don't sweat it mate, everything will be as it always has, fine.
No matter what happens friend
@@BJL2142 Not really. Since humans showed up everything went downhill.
@@liu3chan my comment meant once your dead, because death is a break in continuity
Even still humans aren't sh*t in the grand scheme of everything ever
Gl
If you really want some dread, there is technically a 50-50 chance we live in a simulation.
Except we can't conclude that more of the universe is spinning in one direction than the other because we are limited by the distance that we can observe (the observable universe) so it might actually be 50/50, or way off from that.
I wonder if the actual paper he cited discusses the sampling error possibility? Statistics is strong enough to say that the likelihood of their proportion representing the whole universe is more than 95% or even 99%, if they've sampled well enough.
Btw how do you measure the spinning direction of a galaxy? (I mean from what reference) Does it have pole like a planet?
but things falling towards a gravitational source are following a gravity point that is lagged from the actual moving thing, they will always hit off-center and impart a angular momentum.... Only if everything was exactly still in the universe would they hit on-center, but then they will impart a linear momentum, which will cause them to move, and subsequent collisions happen off-center. There is no initial torque in the universe.
@@Nekzuris yeah thats what i was thinking
@@Nekzuris Answering the frame of reference question is important. In a single telescope view, you could use an "as seen by the observer" reference. Galaxies that are not exactly edge on can be assigned into "left" and "right" bins. But if you take an image in exactly the opposite direction, do you invert the "left" and "right" categories? At any viewing angle between them, do you also try to compensate?
Are we living in a dream?
*Tanjiro searching katana in his basement..*
Thank you for making me want to buy a top for $76 when I could’ve lived very happily never knowing it existed.
I just finished watching inception, so this is pretty fitting
fits because this is a dream and its time to wa
@@ImigrentfromMars Underrated.🖕
There is always a bigger dream or a different dream.
Every Lucid Dreamer laughing knowing he can just count his fingers
I have two main thoughts on this subject: the first one is that we are always limited in our field of view of the universe by the speed of light and therefore we have no way of knowing whether more will be revealed once that light has gotten to us and/or our instruments for measuring it have gotten better and the second one is much more absurd and, if you've live as long as I have, you realize that the absurd is often reality and that is that perhaps this explains why so many humans and animals are right-handed/pawed. Observe your own cat, dog, and/or other mammal to observe that they have at least a slight predominance toward being right-handed/pawed.
Thank you so much for all the knowledge you have given so far. I am always waiting for your following videos to drop.
I say shenanigans because it’s gotta be the most painful and most beautiful dream ever.
I would honestly buy one of these just to freak someone out.
"The Water is applying torque to the ball." More like the the center of mass is ofset to the balance point or the center of buoyancy and gravity is using this distance as a "lever" to apply the torque.
Yeah, that statement didn't sit right with me either. I guess he was trying to simplify things...but he shouldn't have stated it this way just for arguments sake.
@@F_L_U_X the video is a bit too over simplified. Is is the rotation of the motor that induces a rotation in the opposite direction or is it some gyroscopic effect similar to that spinning ball that spins faster when you shake it?
The explanation is so over simplified that I don't understand it anymore.
The water is irrelevant. It would spin in a vacuum without gravity.
yeah, and actually i still do not understand how is the top sustaining the spin. It cannot utilize gravity in the same way because its spinning axis is fairly accurately vertical.
You start the video at end of inception and still blow our minds. You are awesome!
Btw that spinning motor can also be found in many phones, which provides the vibrations for notifications and haptic feedback
What a mic drop at the end, ill be thinking about that all day!
It’s possible that while the OBSERVABLE universe has net angular momentum, parts of the universe far enough away to be beyond the horizon of what we can see might have the opposite angular momentum.
This is a good comment.
You are ignoring the obvious answer.
@@sawik5 it’s not a good comment. It’s wishful thinking. Circular reasoning… SETI has been listening to the universe since 1984 (other work was going on for nearly 90 years before it) and they’ve come up with: nothing. Oh it’s out there we just need to keep listening… the problem is compounding, the more you listen, nothing is heard… same with peering to the “edge” of the galaxy… yet there is more and more out there. “Just given more time we’ll find something.” No, they will not. Our universe is elegantly designed. Evidence of design is all around. DNA is the greatest/most complex computer code… bill gates said something along this.
@@snteevveetns who said anything at all about aliens??
@@snteevveetns yeah dude, in my original comment i agreed with the actual reasoning value and quality of the comment, it's nothing about aliens, nothing about keeping looking, its just a factual statement that this angular momentum might be local to our local observable universe which has a definitive border, and I know we will never find other data. Your comment is valid but just seems kinda like not really on the subject we were talking about.
Tho, I get you man, sometimes i also got wrongly triggered with normal stuff after some too long sesh with some "belivers" or other antivaccers. It's easy to get paranoid, It's just we are not spreading any misinformation, just pointing out a valid thing that was missed in the video.
However I do see how in wrong hands this argument could be turned around and used by crazy people for screaming "Aliens!!!", i just hope there are none here xd.
Once I saw those wired, I was like “oh it’s motorized”
Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather.
i think the commonly accepted model of the universe and it's history deserve reconsideration
Correction: It's not that the top won't fall if in someone's dream. It's that Leo is the only person who knows HOW it falls. I've always felt the end of this movie was misleading, but the "feel" of the item being what's important is supported by another character's totem being a die. That character won't even let someone else hold it, because they may sense how the die is weighted. And Leo always makes sure to pick up his totem if someone walks in while it's spinning so that they can't see how it falls.
Apart from the rest part of this video, the information provided at the last part is amazing. Thanks.
Great episode. I'd like to hear more about the 7% galactic rotation direction difference. Did that study include rotation speed, galactic mass and dark energy?
Same. I am curious to know of potential errors and “missing” knowledge. For example, we cannot account for the galaxies that we cannot see due to being blocked by the plane of our own galaxy.
I think a sample size of 15000 out of trillions is probably not quite enough
Act of god probably
just flipping the galaxies over changes their spin direction... doesn't mean that there was more torque in one direction, they've have billions of years to flip over and be in different alignment than their first inception.
also, did they take into acount the unobservable part of the universe?
I think the study is flawed since 1) they are seeing galaxies at different times (some of them are too far away that they could have been extinguished), 2) the sample size is insignificant compared to the number of galaxies (at the same time) in the whole universe.
This guy isn't a person.he is a Legend!
Your best yet. Now I won't be able to go to sleep. My mind will be "spinning" on the universe's external torq idea. Good stuff Sir!
we're not living in a dream, we're living in a nightmare!
Gaznfeld experiment, lucid dreaming + reality checks, wbtb tech - you’re welcome for this rabbit hole. Amazing stuff.
Can we just take a moment to appreciate how action lab went back in time to this dream to record this video?
Acctualy this video never ended
Wow! That is such a cool gadget. Nice video, I enjoyed it. I’ve been subbed for a while now, and I’ve learned a lot. Thank you, you never fail to make my day.
I think if you flipped a left hand galaxy upside down it would be a right hand galaxy
Great timing!
Apparently, recently earth's rotation has sped up even though our moon is constantly slowing us down.
One hypothesis is that the wobble may have evened out like what we see at the beginning of the video.
I thought it was a funny idea to see what happens when I pray it happen. So I spoke to it like Jesus did the universe, and bam the earth is spinning faster.
@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 😁
@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 Stephen Colbert says it was because everybody pulled their arms in close to their body like when we're spinning on a office chair.. lol.
@@MadDragon75 oh ok, well i dont know who Stephen Colbert is. but the chair thing sounds kinda fun.
@@son_of_hiskingdom5092 He's a Late Night talk Show Host. I found it relatable and thought that was funny.
Thank you for the video! ☺♥
i kinda want to buy that spinning top to troll some people
We'd sell it to you if you'd wanna buy them
@@fearlesstoys3474 Sure where would I go to get one?
@@Crytum look at their channel, they make them
@@shanibres i have checked their channel and i cant find any way to purchase it there. no links other than a broken link to an old kickstarter page on one of their videos
This episode made me ask more questions than what was answered!
I NEED ONE OF THESE
it's called LIMBO Top
One of the best channels on RUclips!
15,158 is too small a sample size out of hundreds of billions in the visible universe, it's entirely possible that LOCALLY there are more clockwise spinning galaxies while there are more counter-clockwise spinning galaxies in another region.
Exactly, so what he's saying is that in the "Observable Universe" there's more left handed spinning galaxies but I'm w/ you on the sample size..... That's like looking at 1 grain of sand and determining that all sand is that size and shape whenever we haven't even been on another beach or taken a single step away from the spot we're standing on.
I like your point about the "torque of the Universe" ; the way I personally see it, it's one of these fundamental imbalances we need to investigate, like for example why there was more matter than antimatter. Perhaps these two are related somehow? If they annihilated in an asymmetric manner, it could explain the torque "from the inside", without any need for external forces?
It wasn't his top. The top belonged to his wife. He had a diferent totem. The ending becomes completely diferent, if you remember that.
How, do you mean?
@@1gorSouz4 Cobb's (Leonardo Dicaprio) totem was his wedding ring, Mel's (his wife) was the spinning top.
The reason the top stops in Inception is because his is special, it's made to stop on purpose, but he'll know he's in a dream because the dreamers conscious would not know the difference between a normal top and his special top. So in the dream, his top will keep spinning like any other top.
🤓
Normal tops normally stop..
For me this is the coolest experiment until now on this channel! Always wanderd about inertia mystery! This gives some answers but also new questions! For shure something to think about more. Keep going Mr Action Lab, you are the best!
I think the big bang was a result of a previous universe collapsing, which would also explain the angular momentum being precent from the start
But how would the first universe start?
@@joonyjun7861 starting fluid
"If you remember the planet that we're currently on, Earth, ..." XD XD
Even though it is often said that "The Universe is Isotropic and Homogeneous," it obviously is not. And that indicates it's initial condition was not, or there had to be a cause to bring about a change in state to account for the irregularities in the Universe.
Not you trying to make this about your god 😂
It's isotropic and homogenous at big enough scales. It's similar to how water is isotropic and homogenous, even though it's made out of very dense atoms. Your correct that there needs to be some small initial instabilities for galaxies to form, and I believe thise can actually be explained by quantum mechanics.
@@ilikewaffles3689 I invoked "causality," not god.
@@ryancairns2099 I don't have one, my guy. But that doesn't mean that your god is real.
@@ryancairns2099 no, no it doesn't. Like, not at all
The little motor pulled apart at 2:00 looks like the haptic feedback/vibrating device common in phones and cheaply available on ebay etc.
Because it is.
How did the big bang get angular momentum?
God: It's all in the wrist.
I love how this is uploaded the day I watched Inception for the first time. lol
I want to buy this to fool people …
I looked at several comments and didn't see an answer. If I look at a galaxy this way, it's spinning that way, and if I look the other way, it's turning another way. I don't understand how we can say the majority are spinning a certain way when there is no at-rest position.
I'd love to see a graph of summed up angular momentum of galaxies in relation to z-score i.e. redshift - does it even out the further we look or does it stay roughly the same? I hope those scientist accounted for mass of the galaxies and not summed only their number.
My, man... The end of your video was a mindblower...
If it really works as shown it’s incredible. Where can I get one?
You can get one on our website, fearless toys, we make them. What do you make?
row row row your boat gently down the stream, merrily, merrily, merrily, life is but a dre-.... oh god, they've been trying to warn us for years!
How do you tell the difference between a "right" and "left" spinning galaxy when there's no correct frame-of-reference?
Absolutely.
With their "arms" aligned the same way, you can look for it at the example in the video at 5:01, with the video paused, both look the same but when you press play again you will notice.
@@hugofco2037 but if you were on the other side of the galaxy, it would be spinning in the opposite direction. Since there's no up and down in space, what frame-of-reference do we use?
@@F_L_U_X Obviously, we use the frame of reference from the point where these measurements are taken, on (or near) Earth.
5:22 see figure 1
I love how I watch this, after being sleep deprived for a few days, lol
Thanks for that video, but does anyone know where to buy that top? I realy couldn‘t find one.
it's called LIMBO Top by Fearless Toys
I'm still waiting for my top to arrive, but good to see that some backers already got theirs.
Can you give me a Link to one of These, since i want to make Sure to buy a real one
We make them! They are called LIMBO, check out our channel or simply go to our website you can get them there.
HOORAY! I can now watch it!
Nice :-)
Where can I get a top like this?
Ma Nishma Igal? Fearless Toys is the company that makes them, local guys.
Wow the final conlcusion was very thought provoking.
Wouldn't you also have to account for differences in the mass of each galaxy? If the left hand rotating galaxies are les massive then wouldn't it make sense that there would be more of them?
I guess with a small sample size you would. But with a sample size of 15000 the mass should average out over the samples... right?
@@chdcris Maybe it was for all galaxies of nearly equivalent mass?
Also, how certain are we that the sample taken for analysis accurately represents the rest of the universe? Maybe we're in a localized pocket where there are more of one kind than the other and the JWST will reveal others we haven't been able to see before.
I thought so too. But also we cannot account for the galaxies we cannot see due to being blocked by the view of our own galaxy.
@@chdcris If I remember correctly 15000 galaxies is about 1/1000 % of the total amount of galaxies that we can see, let alone the amount of galaxies that there actually are. If the study was truly conducted as presented in this video, it's a useless study with bogus conclusions.
Action lab is moving from physics to metaphysics.
This topic is strong evidence of the Creator's existence, because randomness like the Big Bang does not create an accurate cosmic system, and thank you very much for your effort and explanation on various topics. I learned a lot from you
This is strong evidence that cheese is good.
The study sample size is biased to the area we inhabit, it's a flawed study.
Exactly what I was thinking
Okay, go count a different area..
@@Dr_Wrong Did you just take offence to something factual?
@@jaredhouston4223 _"Did you just take offence to something factual?"_
Nope but it sure sounds like you did.
"OMG! they had the audacity to begin studying cosmology without waiting for FTL with hypergalactic range exceeding 13Gly, then they could just drive there and look and not be lying to everybody all the time!"
"Flawed" is comparative word. Usually used as a pejorative.
*_Nothing_* is perfect. "Best possible" isn't perfect..
If 'best possible' = flawed to you, then you're in for a long, boring, sad, life rejecting knowledge..
@@Dr_Wrong The study is flawed, your emotions are getting the better of you. I'm allowed to disagree with the the study, it's healthy for the process. However, if you're implying that I'm discrediting the work to even bring up the problem, you don't have to continue to argue with me. The work that has been done is greatly appreciated.
Great episode!
If you have energy inside you can trade one speed for another. Like what satellites do with reaction wheels. So you could be inside a non-rotating container and use an engine to spin something you have thus generating a reaction force on the container making it begin to rotate. Likely what happened in the first pico-seconds of the big bang. (if there was a big bang, not so likely now!)
Bro you can’t just end on that cosmic question. I’m not going to be able to sleep tonight terrified of what originated the universe’s angular momentum
That is really interesting. That being said, did the study try to account for the galaxies on the plane of our galaxy which we can never see?
that shouldn't matter
@@schmarcel4238 It matters to me, dammit! It matters to me 😡
@@schmarcel4238 statistically are you sure? There might be 7% more that spin right in aggregate.
@@westonding8953 but why would the galaxies in our plane be so special as to spin in the opposite direction of all other galaxies? They should most likely show the same distribution of angular distribution as the rest of the universe
@@schmarcel4238 There is the "Axis of Evil" which he explains in another video. That is unexplained. This could possibly be involved in that. They totally could have a different distribution of angular momentum.
me: "finally, a perpetual motion machine!"
I need to buy this top. Where can I get one
You really do need to! you can get them on our website, it's called LIMBO by Fearless Toys
@@fearlesstoys3474 wow. At that price id rather not know if I'm truly awake.
Sorry, but it's wayyyy out of my budget...
@@phs125 shoot us a msg on the website chat
you made my head hurt, and I liked it! breaking open the top 1:41
Where can i buy one
On our website, we're Fearless Toys and we make those. James must have forgotten to mentino that...silly guy. It's called LIMBO TOP.
He needs to list an affiliate link to buy the top I want one.
It's called LIMBO, I'd post a link but RUclips will remove it so simply search for it :)
If we are then i guess my nightmare finally ended 🥹
This thing will keep spinning until the battery runs out :D
Do you have a place I can buy this?
I can't tell you where, but can tell you that it's made by Fearless Toys. You'll find it there.
If the universe is infinite there should be areas with higher or lower gradients of left or right angular momentum. Not only was their sample size small, it was focused on a portion of our presentation of the universe. This could be like looking at one country to get an average for skin color instead of the whole planet.
James, do you have a link to your inception top? I've looked around for one that works really well, but haven't been able to find one.
I agree! I have been looking for one as well. Where do we get them?!?
*EDIT* Fearless toys makes them and it's $80.
@@mthedemonhunter Spot on!
This video posted the same day my Limbo top from Kickstarter came in the mail. So I’m guessing this is the same top :)
It is! Why didn't he mention anything about it?
I never knew being too smart can lead you to lose your damn mind! No we are not in a dream.
Nightmare, more like! That's if I can even watch the bloody video.
"No we are not in a dream." Bullshit. Eliphalet Oram Lyte published a scientific paper in 1852 conclusively proving otherwise. If you'd taken the time to do your research before spreading this misinformation, you would have found his seminal proof on the simulation hypothesis. But I guess it's up to others to do your legwork for you, and I'll give you this, this one time only so you can find it in your university library. The title of the work is "Row, Row, Row Your Boat," and it proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that "life is but a dream."
Damn the lengths I have to go to bring some sense into the world . . .
@@rollomaughfling380 then what's a dream?
Awesome video man! Really got me thinking, thank you.
Are we living in Leonardo DiCaprio’s dream?!?!
I must have one of these motorized tops!
I feel that the sample of galaxies was too small to draw meaningful conclusions when considered as a percentage of the total number of galaxies in the known universe.
Thought the same but probability theory would say no.
In my dream I wouldn’t be able to get it to spin in the first place
That's cool! :D Too bad you can't buy this thing anywhere. There's a gadget called "limbo" somewhere, but that's a kickstarter thing where you have to pre-order and wait a year...
Yup seems like it's LIMBO. It's available on their website.
@@gevat1 I can only find a pre-order and I don't want that. I hate waiting.
@@snapsna3567 The one I'm looking at is not pre-order, search for fearless toys it's the name of the company it'll bring you to the right place
Scam/ comment ad warning. Please don't fall for the comment and replies above. Its a scammy marketing strategy in which the main goal is to create fake hype for the product they're trying to sell and by redirecting you to their own brand as if it's unique, when there are actually millions of other brands selling the same thing.
All existential issues got “solved” for me when i realized any of these issues also apply to whatever universe is being supposed to be outside of ours.
There is absolutely no evidence that separate universes exist, and no evidence saying they don't. You may be thinking of the multiverse theory, which describes infinite quanta of our own universe, collapsing under observation, but those are all part and parcel of the one universe we live in, and is only a theory anyways.
Please make an another hindi channle in which you can dub yours videos in hindi
Please
This could be the strongest beyblade ever