Astronauts Journeys To Jupiter Encountering A Highly Advance Species
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июл 2021
- An imposing black structure provides a connection between the past and the future. When Dr. Dave and other astronauts are sent on a mysterious mission, their ship's computer system, HAL, begins to display increasingly strange behavior, leading up to a tense showdown between man and machine that results in a mind-bending trek through space and time.
More Recap Channels To Watch:
linktr.ee/RecapChannels 
Кино
people in 1968: surely by 2001 we'd be able to routinely travel to other planets
2021: for the last time, the Earth is ROUND
lmaoo ,bro
😂😂
"science is FAKE NEWS"..
We don't even go to the moon anymore.
The apes in the movie contribute more to the gene pool then flat earth believers.
This guy just straight up said tapirs are "Creatures resembling anteaters"
Hes built different
He needs to reach 500 words on his essay
Tapir.
Facepalm
@@asdrubalegirolamo660 yyoooo I'm dead
😂😂😂
Totally glossed over the fact that HAL read their lips when they were discussing his potential fate in the pod, which prompted the ensuing homicidal behavior. Also, Dave doesn't go to Jupiter, he goes into the star gate that the monolith opens.
He actually Explains a lot in these with out giving away to much, or the ending wrap up.
yeah, i noticed that these "recaps" miss a lot/and often get a lot wrong. i feel bad for people/someone who thinks "i watched the 10 minute recap so i dont see any reason to watch the movie anymore." it'd be like listening to 20 second snippets of songs and thinking you heard the entire album.
@It doesn’t matter What your name is i think you missed the part where i was talking about those who think they no longer need to watch the movie(disregarding the entire experience that comes with witnessing a movie because they saw a 10 minute recap. that's all i'm saying. not hating because obviously i'm here on the video too. just saying one shouldn't let these videos replace the experience that comes with watching a movie, be it good or bad, you still made a memory/rather than contribute to the short attention span of content consumers these days.
@@titlewave489 Totally agree with you. I’ve seen or read reviews or recaps of newly released movies and I’ve never let them stop me from seeing the whole thing afterwards.
It’s interesting to note that I’m quite capable of wiping the review from my mind very quickly - I watch the full movie and nothing is spoiled. Nothing at all.
Now it makes a lot more sense
9:45 “no remorse can be seen from the red dot” 💀😂 this made me laugh
I was looking for this exact comment, lol!
😂😂😂
The script on this episode is one of the finest; even funnier that the narrator itself is an AI 😂
this was filmed in 1968 btw. The cinematography and the HD in this film was revolutionary. Kubrick modified the cameras himself after studying his whole life. I just love showing someone this film and then saying this was filmed in the late 60's. their expression on their face is priceless
Well, a lot of the aesthetics in the film are obviously 60s-style. The furniture, some of the hair, the somewhat flat look of the sharpness. It was revolutionary, though, and it’s so clean and clear for a movie from back then even on film that it absolutely blew people’s minds.
Yeah they're shocked because it's the same camera trickery NASA used till people started noticing they were looking at painted boards
@@Gaybraham.Lincoln lmao
@@Gaybraham.Lincoln why fake something as random as a moon landing lmao?
Its them hats the ladies wear wot gives it away guv!
Don’t even think Kubrick could explain this one.
The room is weird because the radio broadcasts that reached the aliens told them "this is human architecture " even tho it is out dates by the time of the film, because radio waves take time to travel. The aliens, through the monoliths, enhance beings they deem worthy intelligence, like the ape that figured out tools after touching the monolith. Since Dave was the first one to reach Jupiter, he became a timeless energy being, like the creators of the monolith.
Long and the short if it, from the book, which was written at the same time as the film.
Its a movie about the evolution of consciousness.
Rob Aeger has great analysis for this
Most confusing film ever…
The answer is simple yet complicated to explain.
The movie is LITERALLY a movie.
The black monolith represents a movie screen.
So when in the end scene where the guy realise what the monolith represents he broke the 4th wall by acknowledging who he is.
Just a character in a movie.
The ape part is hilarious knowing its just people in costumes
Getting pounced by a leopard, comedy gold. All jokes aside, that leopard was trained for play fighting.
when the guy was beating the other ape with a bone I was laughing so hard
What I wouldn’t give to be paid to put on a suit and revert to monkey
And tapirs played the anteaters.
Yes
actually "the astronaut" didn't go to the jupiter, he jumped trough space/time to somewhere else, to an unknown planet when he entered the monolith
I believe you’re correct. I never thought it was Jupiter I always thought he went though a black hole or something to another planet.
I agree. On Jupiter he would have probably been instantly yeeted by the craziest storms ever seen
Yes.
In the book, they found the monolith on a moon of SATURN and that’s where he went in. 🤦🏽♀️
@@296jacqi yes, in Saturn's moon, but not on it, but in it's orbit. There is rumors that Kubrick didn't used Saturn as in the book, because it was too challenging to make the scenes with it's rings and Júpiter was also a good option because it was bigger then Saturn.
"Creatures resembling an anteater"
Tapirs: 👁👄👁
sad tapir noises
:(
More like: 👁 👁
👄
uncultured people, screw anteaters, they're idiots, I saw one once at a bar, he couldn't even find his way to a bar stool before falling on the ground, cus they're stupid, tapirs are awesome
@@thegamingtapir5449 Tapirs reading your comment:
👁 👁
👄
Sad Tapir honking
This movie was WAY ahead of its time.
@gyrergd space Odyssey 2001
Still is
still is
Star trek is too.
@gyrergd I know someone already said this but the movie is called 2001: A Space Odyssey, for some reason people assume it was made in 2001 and it’s not their fault considering the quality of the movie but it was actually released in 1968.
the mother of all sci-fi films, just imagine in the 1960s watching this masterpiece
Surprisingly not the first film to feature AI either. Though considering it was '68, probably more accurate to assume the majority of people saw it in the 70s. Now, think about how wild it must have been to be watching a movie about AI in 1927 with the movie Metropolis. That had to have blown some minds.
Imagine all the blown minds in the theatre.
that would be metropolis not this movie.
Probably feels similar like watching "Interstellar" 😁😊
The book was better imo
These sci fi movies are so trippy and I would've never understood the plot if you didn't explain it, if I watched it by all by myself
The legend himself.
I have found u not surprised now tbh
How are you everywhere
I also like the movie because the actor is george floyd
@@rlm2933 wrong floyd 🙈
This one still looks so aesthetically pleasing and futuristic, without any CGI madness. A masterpiece that lasts.
This movie and interstellar are peak cinematography
@@yourgrandmasalzheimerpills1143 Interstellar is my favorite movie. SO good!!!
CGI is like a competition of bad taste, fucking sucks
@@yourgrandmasalzheimerpills1143 what about Alien ?
You're going to explain an unexplainable movie, I'm all ears.
I mean, its really not that unexplainable lol
But the point of these kinds of channels is to recap what happens, not really explain anyway
Well there is Kubrick's way, one can interpret in lots of ways, he even say this . And there is the book way, by Arthur Clarke. I prefer the book way.
And it is the only case which I think it is better to watch the movie first and then read the book.
The movie was basically a secret love letter to esoteric traditions such as alchemy, freemasonry and qabalah.
@@bill775how so?
@@rubenbarrera7338 He put alot of symbolism and esoteric stuff in his movies. 2001 and Eyes Wide Shut were great representations of that, you can't miss it
Personally, i would title it "Astronauts Journey To Jupiter Encountering A computer problem."
Hal talks about Langley that should be a hint....
and the dimension's of the monolith,,, 1 x 4 x 9
Why "Journeys" tho? Makes no sense "astronauts journeys " ? 😂
So japanese name
Loooool 😂 computer problem, you know!
You saying the title should be "Astronauts Journeys to Jupiter Encountering an advanced AI"
" a man jogs along the floor and the ceiling "
me: huh?
" ..of a circular room "
me: oh you ;) and your descriptions
so funny and hilarious and cool and entertaining and amazing wooow
@@PipMane What
😂😂
funny comment ;D
I can imagine the little wrist flick thing while you say “oh you”
Just realized this guy has been doing this for 3 months and has this much recapped already, yeah my man has a faithful subscriber!
He has other channels that he's been running for longer. Everything here is on the other channels as well. Copy paste.
@@lorelange still a champ in my opinion
He never puts the film name in the title so you have to watch an ad to find out
@@lorelange how do you know they are by the same person??
@@hyunjinlimb4089 same voice and style.
I realized that the monolith forcefully evolves two different beings in this movie. The ape with the bone realizing what can be done with the tool in his hand and HAL achieving self awareness, making mistakes on his way to true sentience. Both are completely different beings one of flesh and one of electricity, however the monolith gives them both the same chance to evolve. Meaning the aliens either dont understand or care about the differences between the two beings seeing both as similar.
Which pretty much establishes the aliens to be unfathomable beings, and the confusing ending I think just plays into this theme that we cannot understand no matter how hard we try. To be honest, to me this makes sense.
Great explanation!! Very well said
I like your take on the forced evolution of the ape and Dr. Poole but HAL's malfunction was due to human error. HAL was asked to lie and conceal the true purpose of the mission (the monolith) from Dr. Poole. This caused a conflict in HAL which he couldn't resolve. This caused him to malfunction. Now when they started plotting to disconnect him he then had to kill them to complete the mission at all costs.
@@GizmoMaltese HAL Does however (in the books)later on receive the forced evolution from the Monolith.
Or we read the book whereit is explained :D
No, HAL never becomes self aware. It has a malfunction (probably caused by its inability to deal with the monoliths instructions as well as the humans programming). This is covered in more detail in the sequel wherein they go over Hals malfunction in more detail. The guy who invented, built and programmed/raised HAL goes to Jupiter and he diagnoses exactly what went wrong with HAL and why.
HAL's name is derived from Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer.
It’s also a wink and a nod at IBM
HAL is one off alphabetically from IBM
No it stands for Hey Autism
Nah HAL is clearly short for HAL 3000
@@scorchercast8366 that's for the company not the movie
@@jim-mf3dv it actually is a nod to IBM the song "daisy" was a demonstration of IBM's first text to speech program to demonstrate the capabilities of their new IBM computer at the time
"The pod approaches the gas giant."
_Later..._
"David travels the lands, deserts, and ocean of Jupiter."
Me: *Hol up-*
the narrator forgot to tell that david goes into a stargate that the monolith opened, not on jupiter
Ohh.. Now it make sense.
Hahaha I had the same thought!
@@samijacquin8814 THANKS! Explains a lot actually
You mean the 'pod' !?!???!!
40 years old, watched this movie for the first time last night after years of putting it off, scratched my head and BOOM! Recap drops today!
Interesting. Synchronicity. Collective subconscious.
unfortunately the recap is rather confused it's self, Just read the book it's not even that long of a novel and explains everything.
5:00 this is the most poetic you have been with a story recap “a tension weighs them down, more than the heavy space suits they wear”
Honestly, this movie is so confusing. Makes interstellar a very easy to understand movie
Yeah, completely agreed. I've never experienced a bigger waste of time than 2001, I can't stand this film. And this video did nothing to explain it lmao. The only way to get real information is to read the original novel.
It seems like the stories and the progression are poorly connected. The only connection is the black monolith and the effect it has on evolution.
Betas can’t keep up with this wonderful film. You need the monolith in your lives
This channel is perfect for watching movies I want to watch but knew I never was going to.
Same 🤣
tbh i find the movie pretty boring so im glad he did a story recapped on it to see what happened
@@callmeche1215 Well, 2001: A Space Oddysey was never meant to be an enoyable popcorn flicks like Star Wars or Marvel Movies.
It's a hard watch and only people with acquired tastes and hardcore film nuts enjoy it
@@Villenueve1101 I mean I was enjoying it but I got adhd so I never got to finish it, it just got pretty annoying the start of the movie was just shots of space and not nothing going on
@@callmeche1215 2001: A Space Oddysey relies on visual storytelling which means every scene and frame has a meaning
I remember my dad showing me this movie in the early 1990's. He was very enamored with the possibility of being able to have visual phone conversations with our loved ones and lamented that he would never get to see something like that in his lifetime. Little did he know that the iPhone was just around the corner and would change things forever!
For years I wander how they made effect with floating pen, without CGI. They glue pen to large glass and rotate glass. And lady that walk upside down - rotating chamber connected to also rotating camera. Actor needed to match rotation speed and enter in precise moment. It took them days to make that scene, and women injure her knees. Masterpiece.
Fun fact: Beach house used this movie to make a music video for their song "Space Song" which is that music that's being played while pedro pascal is laughing then crying
I'm pretty sure that was a fan video but either way some pretty cool trivia. Love Space Song!
@@harrykelly9526 haha... well that's awkward...
It sucks that such a beautiful song was reduced to “the one in the crying guy tiktok” song
@@mel-ju7kp yeah... really sucks
@@harrykelly9526 was hoping to find the Beach House stans in the comments!!!!
The ending was perfect. It just clarifies that when it comes to beings much more spiritually and technologically advanced than we are, no matter how hard we try, we will never truly be able to grasp or understand...
And sadly it is more likely that AI would explore stars, not us...We are just a step in the evolution of a plsnet
"No remorse can be seen from the red dot" What a Legend.
Sorta reminds me of the robot from wall e that looks like a steering wheel
Yeah that line was perfekt
@@Wilford736 This is what we professionals call "Inspiration"
Many sci-fi movies are inspired by 2001: a space odyssey.
There were more sci fi movies before 2001
@@grimreaper6896 he said after the 2001 movie not before lol
@@frostyplayzzz3762 well I still understand then what he was getting at then I thought he meant that all sci fi movies were inspired by this movie
@@grimreaper6896 he said many not all............
This definetly influenced deadspace
I don't know about u guys, but I sure love to pick bugs off my friends and eat them.
The fuck lol
Isnt that where all our modern grooming techniques originate from haha
For real man?? Tell me because i might start to eat bugs too in the future considering my unemployment
@@tabularasa9576 we need a job for picking off fleas and bugs off of our mates and eating them for nutrients
@@isaacballson3046 the world would be a much healthier place
This movie created in 1968. Amazing how some of the futuristic things portrayed in the movie are became a reality now
wtf like a year before the moon landing, i thought it came out way after
The first time I watched this, I just remember a constant feeling that I was missing something. Hearing someone explain it makes it clear that this movie really was just meant to feel vague and uneasy.
One of the most influential science-fiction films ever.
one of the most significant/important movies to our entire species...
@@titlewave489 seriously ? How ?
I have heard a lot about this movie but its not interesting at all
@@taurussilver3053 just the simple aspect... Video Call
Never seen this movie before, pretty trippy.
It's one of the greatest sci fi movies of all time.
It's famous
Only the ending. I concede that it is beautifully filmed and classic, but is boring as fuck. No, I dont like big explosions and that kind of thing in my sci fi, but still I would onlye reccomend it as a work of art and nothing more.
@@JunguianPhantom I’ve never heard anyone make that critique of this classic.
@@JunguianPhantom if the movie is too boring, people can just watch story recapped. I didn’t find it boring. It would’ve been good to see in the cinema
You would think this movie came out in the 2000's with how it looks. So clean and crisp. Perfection.
This is still one of the greatest movies I have ever seen in my life! So many great shots! It’s still unbelievable that it was shot in 1968. 🤯
Great recap! One of the things you missed though was that HAL was able to read lips, that's how he knew what the two astronauts were talking about when they were trying to hide their conversation from HAL in the pod.
Who else has been binge watching this channel and others like it?
Damn I feel bad for you
@@rinderragout354 for me lol?
@@nzebram yes, and others who watch these videos as a substitute for the actual film.
@@rinderragout354 well I don’t have time to sit down for hours to watch it and I rather just get the summary
@@nzebram Seems like you got enough time to binge watch these videos for hours. That should be enough time for at least one film, no?
such a great channel! Keep up the good work story recapped, making my day 10x better :D
I'm in awe at the lighting, dynamics, and camera angels the film crew put together for this film.
2:00 the sun lighting the middle of the pit for the fight
5:00 the room lighting made me feel like i was sitting back there watching them.
10:00 the light casting on his face.
I've never seen this movie but i want to watch it now.
If the lighting in this movie draws your awe, I strongly encourage you to watch Barry Lyndon. It's beginning to end natural light. I mean, NO artificial lighting of any kind, only sunlight, moonlight, and starlight.
It blew my mind wide open, especially given my education in lighting design for video and film.
The plot and acting are great, too!
Hands down one of the best films ever made
“No remorse is seen in the red dot” lol
Now THIS is a masterpiece. Not just classic.
Im sorry but i still didn't understand, care to explain it to me? 😬
@@lordmiow Do I know you? This film is just strangely bizarre about how astonishing it is. Great science fiction never used before, iconic shots and lines, and is all around a great movie.
@@MrBlueSkyof1607 No you don't know me, im just asking about confusing movie plot are so that what the plot show? a literature about science?
@@lordmiow well think back to the start, when apes discovered monolith, the essentially evolved into using tools and becoming something different - human. Hence, they needed to evolve so they can survive (drive predators away and fight rival tribes). The ending shows us David undergoing so sort of transcendence into a higher state of existence, but to evolve into star child, his old self has to die.
I would take this as allegory for the need of humans to grow past our current selfs and become something more🤷🏻♂️
@@lordmiow oh that. Ask Christopher above me.
I'm binge watching this channel before sleeping
"... no remorse can be seen from the red dot..."
Imagine my shock, hal being unable to express remorse through the lone red bulb...🙄
Keep em coming I'll keep watching.
this is the best channel on YT i watch this everyday
The prequel to Wall-E is intense.
I wasnt realizing it before, but (re)watching this recap reminded me of the scene from Interstellar movie as Cooper went into the blackhole n found himself inside somekind of tesseract structure is pictured (almost) identical as the one here as he decends onto Jupiter. Maybe those of Interstellar get their ideas from this very scene or they r simply paying tribute to (then mindblowing concept of) Kubrick's 2001:Space Odyssey!?
I think the director of interstellar stated that one of his inspirations is space odyssey so it was a type of tribute
Def... the Director of Interstellar really idolized Kubrick. I think it all points to civilization evolution (Kardashev scale) , and dimensions.... 5-D being the scene in Interstellar where he can not only partake in multiple/adjacent universes, but influence them as well. Deep stuff.....
I’m reading the book. It’s actually nice to listen to this, since it gives me an idea of what to come. Thanks mate.
I can't get enough of these spaces recaps
No one:
Story recapped: "Creatures resembling anteaters"
Tapirs: and I took that personally
Me: Soooooo the monolith is the alien... and changes humans into stars, got it👍🏾
Director: absolutely wrong!!!
Wait that’s wrong? So then wth is going on 😂 I’m so confused still. I literally thought that was what it was about.
I definitely thought that's what happened 😰
The monoliths are PLACED BY the aliens, and humans who come into contact with them achieve a higher state of evolution.
@@CraftySouthpaw how is him becoming a star a higher state of evolution? Or is that even what he actually became? What was the room? Why the rapid aging? Everything after the wormhole acid trip makes no sense.
Probably The Best SciFi Movie Ever.
Great old movies! I hope you'd do more of these, and thank you so much.
Anyone notice this is the movie the Futurama episode was based off of when bender sleeps with the ship . The big red eye is in the show !
it’s been parodied over and over by tons of other media.
Best sci-fi movie ever. Can be really boring if you aren’t amped up to watch it.
I am just very confused by it
Honestly, in this case, the book is better
"...and the heavy tension weighs them down more than their spacesuits"--love the casual observations like this
thanks for uploading
For those of you who are confused: the ending is intended to be completely ambiguous. You can weave a bunch of different semi-coherent meanings out of it, but none is actually correct. It's purely abstract, and Kubrick has made this clear in interviews.
Personally i hate movies with such endings. Its a cheap way of getting people to think the movie is deep.
@@emmanuelasare5658 ya. That's why I hate that evangelion anime with a passion. It makes no sense but it's fans seem to think its so deep
Well, if evolution is true , what is possibly being conveyed is man's ultimate evolution into a type 6 civilization.... which is pure energy. We aren't stage 1 right now on the Kardashev scale .... kind of sorry to be a star , imo lol
I'm sorry Dave. I'm afraid I can't let you do that
Take a look at your history, everything you build leads up to me
@@vizelya I'm C++, say hello world I'm about to be your daisy girl
Dude, 😍👀I asked you for this and you delivered 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💕👀
Thank you! Great recap!
The movie seemed so interesting, and then that ending just messed it up for me. Glad I watched this instead!
That's kind of the point. 2001 isn't a movie about plot, it's a movie about philosophical questioning and futuristic portrayal. As well as just being a space movie, after all it was released in 1968 so space exploration and whatnot were not common.
Additionally, the cinematography and how scenes are constructed visually and not is another great part of this movie. Hence why it wouldn't be easy to remake it as good today. Don't go into this movie expecting some great plot with an equally great conclusion, it's not that, or in my view; it's more than that.
Yeh I just fell asleep and woke up at the end thinking I was high
@@dudicorn6503 "I'm so smart and deep". It seemed interesting plot-wise until that bizarre ending. But of course, geniuses like you can surely make sense of the nonsense because you are so smart and deep. Even then, you still never explained your interpretation of what happened. "philosophical questioning and futuristic portrayal" is some vague bullshit with no real meaning as pertaining to the movie ending.
@@MelvinJ64 he’s not a genies he just looked deeper into the intended message of the film but. This channel does not substitute for actually watching a great film like this
@@MelvinJ64 he travels through a Star Gate which causes him to evolve at a rapid paces, and in his mind he perceives the evolution in a limited way his mind can cope with, showing his slowly age from each scene, until he is literally reborn as a new life form which is more energy then matter, the star child, in the three books Bowman’s evolutionary life cycles are glimpses of what The Firstborn (the monolith aliens) have become-reincarnating just as the Star Child, from flesh and blood beings, to energy beings, to merging with their computers, to ultimately becoming “Lords of the Galaxy
I always wanted to watch this but I never had time + i completely forgot about it, awesome movie choice!
This videos are very enjoyable, thank you for your time and effort in making them.
Love your vids man god bless keep doing what your doing
This brings a lot of clarity to the movie Interstellar and Interstellar brings a lot of clarity to the end of this movie too. Damn.
I was always frustrated that the movie changed it from Saturn in the book to Jupiter in the movie. The interactions of the rings in the book were beautifully described. Would’ve been nice to see on screen.
There are rumors Kubrick choosed Jupiter because it was too difficult to make the rings of Saturn that time and Jupiter was a good choice because it was bigger and more dramatic.
I’m so glad I came across this channel❤️
"The Red Dot showed No Remorse" . . . I freakin love this channel
"Creatures resembling anteaters"
Tapirs: Am I a joke to you?
I love how you want us to watch out and take care for the space odyssey in 2001
I’ve been binge watching since yesterday
"No remorse can be seen in the red dot" got me dead asff
Watch we are gonna see the mustache man again and i luv it
Earned a subscriber!
Never understood what was happening when I seen it glad this is uploaded
Stanley Kubrick was a legend.
9:04 Correction: Dave did see Frank, that's why he went out to space to rescue Frank from death.
Also, near the end, it doesn't take a genius to know that when when Dave is traveling through the Stargate and the strange worlds, that is because he neared the obelisk and it is speaking to Dave, and the strange worlds are not Jupiter, they are other worlds. Jupiter does not even have a surface and oceans, and is just a ball of gas and storms. Nobody can go into Jupiter as it would kill you instantly.
Fun Fact: The scenes where Dave sees the strange worlds, it's just film captured by the director, Stanley Kubrick's assistant viewed from a helicopter with various filters put over it. The scenes where Dave witnesses nebulae forming and etc. is Kubrick filming drops of various paints and oils dropped in his coffee to make that effect.
“His calm manner remains, but the frustration, sadness, and fear are evident in his eyes.”
I remember watching this at the drive-in theater way back in 60's
The synopsis misses one crucial factor: the two step into the pod to make sure that HAL can’t hear them talk about HAL’s potential “breakdown” and what to do about it. But you notice there’s a window they’re looking out of toward HAL. There’s a short close-up shot, perspective looking INTO the pod where the two are talking, no sound (for the audience), of their lips moving.
HAL knows exactly what they are planning.
HAL=IBM or the computer in Brussels Belgium the IBM 3666 computer
Yes, but how? HAL read their lips.
Also, the synopsis missed a lot of stuff, but that ia good.
@@jamesgary2351 H+ 1 letter = I and soo on
My high school library used to have the option to borrow dvds from the school's collection and watch them in the school or at home, I usually watch them in school. And I remember watching this over 3 different times because my ex-gf at that time will end school later than me and we'll meet up after her class.
So, each time I watched this, I did not understood what each time was trying to say, because of the time gap between each time. But I remember vividly that I told myself that I need to finish it because I need to know what is happening exactly. And I love it. after many years, I finally watched it in 1 sitting..
I like how you explain movies. Keep it up!👍
This channel is pretty epic
Well that was underwhelming I still don’t get what the whole point was 🤔
if you're interested, read the books - they do a decent job of explaining
Have you read The Odyssey by Homer?
It's kinda like that, but in Space.
You need to actually watch the film
@@joebloggs6922 No he doesn't. The film does jack shit to explain any of this and is one of the most boring 2 hours I've ever wasted. Literally zero additional information of any kind is gleaned by watching the whole film. Reading the original Arthur C. Clarke novel is the only way you get a better experience.
@@Enzar17 just because it isn’t a fucking Michael Bay Transformers movie doesn’t make it boring. It’s literally a masterpiece
( two videos in a day..😯)
Story recapped: I can do this all day..
Thank you all who explains movies i saw 100 movies in 2 days
thanks! i could never have sat through this one in real time.
"I'm going to explain..."
::Popcorn::
This should be interesting.
“Peace, serenity, and boredom radiate from the environment.”
The fact that the cinematography looks better than most movies in the 80s and 90s.
Wow, what a classic. Thanks for reviewing this.
I love how an article in the Guardian claims that the SFX of the late 60's were so bad that the Apollo missions couldn't be a hoax. What about this gem:
"You would also have to imagine that 2019-era special effects were available to Nasa in 1969 and not one of the 600 million TV viewers noticed anything amiss. Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) is a decent indication of what Hollywood special effects could do at the time - and it’s extremely shonky. It genuinely was simpler to film on location."
Shonky.
"No remorse can be seen from the red dot"
"2010" - I saw before this movie. Very faithful to the author's original vision of this old book.
Thank you for bringing the voice back nigga listened 🙏🏾
This movie was AGES Ahead of it's Time....HATS OFF To Director and Story Writer