0:29 and 1:28 The opponent is forced to use imperm here. If the ulti-cannahawk search goes through then we can immediately summon ulti-nochiudrago afterward which turns off all targeting effects. (Elder + Winda) If they let us search and then use imperm on Ulti-Cannahawk before we can reach an open game state for the summon of ulti-nochiudrago, we can link the Ulti-Cannahawk into Ulti-Kimunfalcos for a better end board since we didn't SS elder + winda yet. 2:10 Didn't return the banished ulti-cannahawk to the GY to play around called by the grave 4:23 This early gaiapelio line ends on 1 less negate when compared to the other lines. The advantage is the early insulation from Nibiru or other disruptions.
A really smart opponent could let ulti-cannahawk's eff resolve and add wen, and then use imperm on resolution, before you can summon ulti-nochiudrago. Also, if you make the ulti-nochiudrago here, you are then vulnerable to Nibiru, so you would pretty much have to take a gamble in what you think your opponent might have.
3x ETele is more important than 3x Inheritance - inheritance is neg card advantage - inheritance is weak to droll - inheritance without RB monsters is scoop - multiple inheritance is bad + Etele + canna gives 5 disruptions + Etele will play trough handtraps + Etele in multiples is not bad
I think it’s a different philosophy right? Inheritance can make a meh hand rlly good in seconds with e tele your basically going into the single canna without just canna
@@bryanhickernell7189 of course, but if someone says "i play 3 inheritance and 2 etele because i think inheritance is more important" that means the 3rd copy competes for the same slot. i listed why i think otherwise
I think that’s prob 1 of the open slots of the deck you can play e tele for even more consistency or you could go like me and play macro/ dim fissure for more I want to banish all the things thing. It’s all in what your trying to do with the deck, the deck has become surprisingly versatile as a stun deck
Also with e tele your kinda relying on having either a ritual beast or spiritual beast tamer in your hand where as with inheritance that problem doesn’t rlly exist
Great video! I do have a stupid question tho... What do you mean with cards like Spellbound don't affect us? Even though we aren't performing a fusion summon aren't the materials for a contact fusion classed as fusion material? Anyway as an avid RB enjoyer who played them religiously when they came out I love what you are doing, might start playing Yugioh again because of you! 😄
Nevermind about the question, it counts as a special summon (and I read Spellbound again *facepalm*). If I may suggest some music tho I think Library of Ruina OST's would go hard on these type of videos 😅 Keep up making awesome content!
I'm currently opting to cut it because the deck is already very consistent with the new support and I don't want to play any harder into droll. Kind of like how some fire king players are cutting prosperity even though they don't really need most of their extra deck to function. We don't have as many one card starters but we're also more reliant on our extra deck and can't banish 6 as freely. It's a personal preference whether you want to run it. You could replace some engine cards for 1-3 copies of prosp based on what works best for you.
Currently testing with 3 macro 3 dim fissure and it’s a blowout vs most decks. Shifter does the same thing but I find dim fissure and macro to be more consistently good bc shifter is rlly only good turn 1
Still learning the deck, thankfully most of it is cheap now but i gotta ask, can we get away with just one of the new Lara? The card is hella expensive and all :(
Playing with only one SBT Lara shouldn't change TOO much but there definitely times where the second one comes up. You'll just mainly lose some consistency so you could play more prosp or inheritance to make up for it
There's almost no difference, it's just an extra psychic target. I usually don't want to banish the second ulti-reirautari (since the first ulti-reirautari can't be reborned if it was summoned with bond). So our best options for a psychic target are an extra ulti-kimunfalcos or ulti-gaiapelio. I figured the second ulti-gaiapelio would come up more often since it's possible to summon it twice in the BP to OTK (by crashing winda for the first gaiapelio and then using bond to summon the second giapelio after the first one attacked). I very rarely find myself wanting a second ulti-kimunfalcos in the grind game since I usually reborn it (from banished with ulti-nochiudrago or from GY with lara/pilica) and tag it back into the extra deck for extra bodies. If you find that an ulti-kimunfalcos may work better for your playstyle you could definitely play it over ulti-gaiapelio. But it won't matter since it's there to banish off rampengu anyway.
@@Chu627 Ulti Gaia is light, enabling opponents to banish it with those new idk-how-they-are- called monsters that summon themselves by banishing light / dark from out GY. There fore 2x falco is better
It should be at rogue (or maybe tier 2 at best). Depending on the format I can see it getting some regional tops or even wins. I won't be surprised if ends up consistently topping a ycs, but I don't think it will ever be a tier 1 deck because there are side cards like lancea that will insta win the matchup. Also, I believe it won't have as much representation as other decks because of its higher complexity. This makes it difficult to play this deck perfectly for multiple matches at a tournament setting.
Imperm won't be able to stop elder's extra normal summon. The ruling is that as long as Elder is sucessfully normal summoned, the player gets to normal summon again any time during the turn - even if Elder is destroyed, negated, flipped face-down, linked off, etc
I'd say Yes, its both a Spiritual Beast and a Ritual Beast Tamer so its very flexable, it can be banishes by Rampengu by banishing the Link-2, its a potencial target for E-tele if you're willing to play it, and its another monster you can recycle through to use Ulti-Cannhawk eff
So as a ritual beast player your not so much worried about getting the smaller guys effs off apart from canna, and pengu; the ulti versions is what your trying to get to and trying to get as many of those effs off as much as possible. The limitations on the smaller guys make an almost required thing to have as many names as possible in the deck to cycle through with ulti-canna. That’s why the spiritual-beast tamers are so good they count as both
I really like the combo through Nibiru. With regards to the decklist, I don't like the new continuous spell very much. I feel it is just better to play more rampengu and I am even playing Noble Knights shield bearer. While the rampengu 1 card combo is the weakest combo in the deck, it is still a 1 card combo nonetheless. Also, pengu + teleport/shifter/elder/lara is full combo.
Hi, thanks for the comment! In my opinion, shield bearer isn't good for the list. Although it's a one card combo, we're already extremely consistent and opening with more normal summons means that even though we didn't brick, we just lose to a single imperm/ash. I'd rather look for ways to play through interruption than add more one card combos. The reason I like inheritance is that it specifically gets us to elder+canna/pengu, which is way more valuable than opening a hand such as e-tele + elder. It plays through more effect negations and it's the only 2 card combo that can play through Nib. Another approach to building the deck is to remove inheritance and play 3x e-tele with relinquished anima in the extra deck. This can open up going second lines such as Anima -> S:P -> Nochiudrago which is something that inheritance can't do.
@@Chu627 Thanks for the reply. This was a long time ago and I have since tested and agreed that the continuous spell is better than shield-bearer. Although I still absolutely think 3 teleports is the way to go.
Hate to say it, but any smart player won’t try to Imperm Ulti-Hawk. They’ll just wait for the tag out and Imperm Cannahawk again. That’s what we have to play through.
That's a mistake because if they let the ulti-cannahawk search go through the player can immediately summon ulti-nochiudrago afterward to turn off all targeting effects. And if they let us search and then use imperm before we can reach an open game state for the summon of ulti-nochiudrago, we can link the ulti-cannahawk into ulti-kimunfalcos for a better end board since we didn't SS elder + winda yet.
@@spyreofthewolves8125 that's exactly the same outcome as the video. Imperm on Ulti-Cannahawk's summon or effect won't make a difference when there's not enough targets in banished since Ulti-Cannahawk doesn't search if it can't return at least one card to the GY
Bro, why are you predating it for 6 hours?? Show us the nice nice spice I’m here for it. Sadly I don’t think the algorithm will recommend me you Video at 6 pm
They both have their pros and cons but I think pure is currently better. For my current zefra build I'm testing 60 cards with small world and 22 hand traps. (There is a line where we can search wakaushi with small world, banish the small world with S:P, and then setup baronne + savage + divine strike alongside our regular RB end board.) This build gives us a similar hypergeometric distribution as the pure for opening non-engine going second. But I think pure still has the advantage because playing 40 gives us a better chance to open power cards like shifter, droll, side deck cards, etc. And Ritual Beasts can already auto-win going first after siding the beatrice with transmigration rollback. Having three omni negates alongside this is a little overkill, it makes the Zefra RB combo less necessary.
![HOW TO PLAY MELODIOUS (IN-DEPTH COMBO GUIDE) [Yu-Gi-Oh!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wew_dJPlZ4E/mqdefault.jpg)
0:29 and 1:28 The opponent is forced to use imperm here. If the ulti-cannahawk search goes through then we can immediately summon ulti-nochiudrago afterward which turns off all targeting effects.
(Elder + Winda) If they let us search and then use imperm on Ulti-Cannahawk before we can reach an open game state for the summon of ulti-nochiudrago, we can link the Ulti-Cannahawk into Ulti-Kimunfalcos for a better end board since we didn't SS elder + winda yet.
2:10 Didn't return the banished ulti-cannahawk to the GY to play around called by the grave
4:23 This early gaiapelio line ends on 1 less negate when compared to the other lines. The advantage is the early insulation from Nibiru or other disruptions.
A really smart opponent could let ulti-cannahawk's eff resolve and add wen, and then use imperm on resolution, before you can summon ulti-nochiudrago. Also, if you make the ulti-nochiudrago here, you are then vulnerable to Nibiru, so you would pretty much have to take a gamble in what you think your opponent might have.
Might be the best RB video yet 💙
Great content! We need more mono-grinders in Yu-Gi-Oh, keep up the good work! I'll recommend this channel to my friends.
Insane content bro congrats
3x ETele is more important than 3x Inheritance
- inheritance is neg card advantage
- inheritance is weak to droll
- inheritance without RB monsters is scoop
- multiple inheritance is bad
+ Etele + canna gives 5 disruptions
+ Etele will play trough handtraps
+ Etele in multiples is not bad
I think it’s a different philosophy right? Inheritance can make a meh hand rlly good in seconds with e tele your basically going into the single canna without just canna
@@bryanhickernell7189 of course, but if someone says "i play 3 inheritance and 2 etele because i think inheritance is more important" that means the 3rd copy competes for the same slot. i listed why i think otherwise
I think that’s prob 1 of the open slots of the deck you can play e tele for even more consistency or you could go like me and play macro/ dim fissure for more I want to banish all the things thing.
It’s all in what your trying to do with the deck, the deck has become surprisingly versatile as a stun deck
Also with e tele your kinda relying on having either a ritual beast or spiritual beast tamer in your hand where as with inheritance that problem doesn’t rlly exist
@@bryanhickernell7189 inheritance without spiritual beast monster does nothing, you need a tamer/ beast to go with it
Great video!
I do have a stupid question tho... What do you mean with cards like Spellbound don't affect us? Even though we aren't performing a fusion summon aren't the materials for a contact fusion classed as fusion material?
Anyway as an avid RB enjoyer who played them religiously when they came out I love what you are doing, might start playing Yugioh again because of you! 😄
Nevermind about the question, it counts as a special summon (and I read Spellbound again *facepalm*). If I may suggest some music tho I think Library of Ruina OST's would go hard on these type of videos 😅
Keep up making awesome content!
excellent video and content brother, I have been a Ritual Beast player since its time and I want to return to it, one question, why not play Pot?
I'm currently opting to cut it because the deck is already very consistent with the new support and I don't want to play any harder into droll.
Kind of like how some fire king players are cutting prosperity even though they don't really need most of their extra deck to function. We don't have as many one card starters but we're also more reliant on our extra deck and can't banish 6 as freely.
It's a personal preference whether you want to run it. You could replace some engine cards for 1-3 copies of prosp based on what works best for you.
Currently testing with 3 macro 3 dim fissure and it’s a blowout vs most decks. Shifter does the same thing but I find dim fissure and macro to be more consistently good bc shifter is rlly only good turn 1
Still learning the deck, thankfully most of it is cheap now but i gotta ask, can we get away with just one of the new Lara? The card is hella expensive and all :(
Playing with only one SBT Lara shouldn't change TOO much but there definitely times where the second one comes up. You'll just mainly lose some consistency so you could play more prosp or inheritance to make up for it
Imperma elder not work? Or on rampengu?
no
do you think that it makes a big difference if i play 1 more kimunfalcos instead of the second ulti gaiapelio?
There's almost no difference, it's just an extra psychic target.
I usually don't want to banish the second ulti-reirautari (since the first ulti-reirautari can't be reborned if it was summoned with bond).
So our best options for a psychic target are an extra ulti-kimunfalcos or ulti-gaiapelio. I figured the second ulti-gaiapelio would come up more often since it's possible to summon it twice in the BP to OTK (by crashing winda for the first gaiapelio and then using bond to summon the second giapelio after the first one attacked). I very rarely find myself wanting a second ulti-kimunfalcos in the grind game since I usually reborn it (from banished with ulti-nochiudrago or from GY with lara/pilica) and tag it back into the extra deck for extra bodies.
If you find that an ulti-kimunfalcos may work better for your playstyle you could definitely play it over ulti-gaiapelio. But it won't matter since it's there to banish off rampengu anyway.
@@Chu627 Ulti Gaia is light, enabling opponents to banish it with those new idk-how-they-are- called monsters that summon themselves by banishing light / dark from out GY. There fore 2x falco is better
hi do u think this deck will be competitive once support drops?
It should be at rogue (or maybe tier 2 at best). Depending on the format I can see it getting some regional tops or even wins. I won't be surprised if ends up consistently topping a ycs, but I don't think it will ever be a tier 1 deck because there are side cards like lancea that will insta win the matchup.
Also, I believe it won't have as much representation as other decks because of its higher complexity. This makes it difficult to play this deck perfectly for multiple matches at a tournament setting.
Why dont imperm first moove first combo?
Imperm won't be able to stop elder's extra normal summon. The ruling is that as long as Elder is sucessfully normal summoned, the player gets to normal summon again any time during the turn - even if Elder is destroyed, negated, flipped face-down, linked off, etc
@@Chu627 ok thx !
is spiritual beast tamer winda really needed?
I'd say Yes, its both a Spiritual Beast and a Ritual Beast Tamer so its very flexable, it can be banishes by Rampengu by banishing the Link-2, its a potencial target for E-tele if you're willing to play it, and its another monster you can recycle through to use Ulti-Cannhawk eff
So as a ritual beast player your not so much worried about getting the smaller guys effs off apart from canna, and pengu; the ulti versions is what your trying to get to and trying to get as many of those effs off as much as possible.
The limitations on the smaller guys make an almost required thing to have as many names as possible in the deck to cycle through with ulti-canna. That’s why the spiritual-beast tamers are so good they count as both
What do you mean contact fuse face down? Like banish face down RB to summon cannahawk??? enlighten me bro HAHA
It is a legal play to banish two face down ritual beasts to summon ulti-cannahawk
I really like the combo through Nibiru. With regards to the decklist, I don't like the new continuous spell very much. I feel it is just better to play more rampengu and I am even playing Noble Knights shield bearer. While the rampengu 1 card combo is the weakest combo in the deck, it is still a 1 card combo nonetheless. Also, pengu + teleport/shifter/elder/lara is full combo.
Hi, thanks for the comment! In my opinion, shield bearer isn't good for the list. Although it's a one card combo, we're already extremely consistent and opening with more normal summons means that even though we didn't brick, we just lose to a single imperm/ash. I'd rather look for ways to play through interruption than add more one card combos.
The reason I like inheritance is that it specifically gets us to elder+canna/pengu, which is way more valuable than opening a hand such as e-tele + elder. It plays through more effect negations and it's the only 2 card combo that can play through Nib.
Another approach to building the deck is to remove inheritance and play 3x e-tele with relinquished anima in the extra deck. This can open up going second lines such as Anima -> S:P -> Nochiudrago which is something that inheritance can't do.
@@Chu627 Thanks for the reply. This was a long time ago and I have since tested and agreed that the continuous spell is better than shield-bearer. Although I still absolutely think 3 teleports is the way to go.
Hate to say it, but any smart player won’t try to Imperm Ulti-Hawk. They’ll just wait for the tag out and Imperm Cannahawk again. That’s what we have to play through.
That's a mistake because if they let the ulti-cannahawk search go through the player can immediately summon ulti-nochiudrago afterward to turn off all targeting effects.
And if they let us search and then use imperm before we can reach an open game state for the summon of ulti-nochiudrago, we can link the ulti-cannahawk into ulti-kimunfalcos for a better end board since we didn't SS elder + winda yet.
@@Chu627 and if they Imperm on Summon of Ulti-Hawk?
@@spyreofthewolves8125 that's exactly the same outcome as the video. Imperm on Ulti-Cannahawk's summon or effect won't make a difference when there's not enough targets in banished since Ulti-Cannahawk doesn't search if it can't return at least one card to the GY
Bro, why are you predating it for 6 hours?? Show us the nice nice spice I’m here for it. Sadly I don’t think the algorithm will recommend me you Video at 6 pm
I'm just testing out different upload times for now and according to RUclips's analytics that's the time where the most of my viewers are active
Do you think the pure version is better than the Zefra one?
They both have their pros and cons but I think pure is currently better.
For my current zefra build I'm testing 60 cards with small world and 22 hand traps. (There is a line where we can search wakaushi with small world, banish the small world with S:P, and then setup baronne + savage + divine strike alongside our regular RB end board.) This build gives us a similar hypergeometric distribution as the pure for opening non-engine going second.
But I think pure still has the advantage because playing 40 gives us a better chance to open power cards like shifter, droll, side deck cards, etc. And Ritual Beasts can already auto-win going first after siding the beatrice with transmigration rollback. Having three omni negates alongside this is a little overkill, it makes the Zefra RB combo less necessary.
Ulti gaiapelio is terrible Bad 😂😂