Thank you very much for this. I am now in a large evangelical church in Minneapolis area. Leadership and most of congregation have drunk the Scofield Kool-aid. I have been trying to debunk Dispensationalism with friends there for some time with almost no success. What you have done here may help me. I grew up as a Lutheran so heard nothing of Dispensationalism. When I started to go to my evangelical church I kept hearing about the Rapture. I bought it for a long time. When Covid and lockdowns hit us I wondered if the tribulation was at hand, I did my own research into Dispensationalism, beginning with Darby, then Scofield and back to the Rothschilds. Didn't take long to realize the whole program was unbiblical and that there was a hidden agenda to the whole program. What you are saying I had found to be accurate. Keep up the good work. My prayers are with you. JM
I was Pentecostal Zionist from head to toes , but no anymore, the more I investigated about darvy, parham, Seymour,scotfield the more God opened my eyes that that dispensationalism isn’t from God.
"In the last days before the return of Christ, true believers will go through persecution... We will go through suffering and God wants us to be awake and aware and prepared so that we can preach the Gospel." AMEN! We are to be Christ's light, shining in the darkness of the end time of the last days.
We will Not going to go thru the suffering " and persecution --we will escape the horrible time --- It's called raptured" those of us in Christ Jesus will be raptured before all that tribulation Armageddon start.... God is not going to allow us to go through that would, you allow your children to go through horrible situations and times if you could prevent it. ....... It's going to be the worst time ever is the end time the ending of this world is going to be horrific when we leave this earth we take the light with us, So there will only be darkness on this Earth Read your word-
@@loleki737 Yes, every generation goes through persecution and tribulation. It isn't reserved for the so-called last days, because we have been in the last days since Christ came and bore our sins on the cross.
Any who truly know God won't fear persecution. Jesus said that fear of man is a trap and the bible is clear that there are no cowards in his kingdom. Pretrib rapture heresy is a doctrine of cowardice. Peter chose worse persecution than Christ as he said he wasn't worthy. How much dedication do we have these days like that? Anyone who is a coward does not know Christ. Matthew 7:21-23 proves that many will say Lord Lord but Christ will say he never knew them. Jesus said that no servant is greater than his master. Who are these cowards that think they are better than Christ?
Although this preacher misrepresents what Calvinism is, he is absolutely correct on dispensationalism being error and heresy. I used to be a member of an IFB church that taught dispensationalism and never knew there was anything else. Then I started learning about the reformed faith (doctrines of grace rediscovered during the Protestant Reformation) and the Lord opened my eyes to understand the doctrine of election and predestination through deeper study of the Word of God. It was glorious. Soon afterward He opened my understanding about how wrong dispensationalism is, and I became post-millennial and that was also glorious. Praise His holy name for His faithfulness to not leave me in darkness and error!
The standard calvinist answer " you misrepresent" so as yo invalidate ALL criticism. Calvinism is a different gospel and so is dispensationalism/rapture etc.
Funny, Pastor says, “you can have bad doctrines and still be saved”…yet goes on to judge the salvation of everyone who has a doctrine he disagrees with , classic! He calls out Ruckmanites as being heretical and unsaved, yet refuses to look at any Greek words, a classic Ruckmanite teaching!
Well, he doesn't cite a lot of scripture to back his claims. Apparently he is very sold on replacement theology. Myself, the Bible seems to show very clearly that God is not yet finished with the people of Israel. He is very quick to judge others. Also there is a distinct difference between demons (unclean spirits) and fallen angels. If the people he is denouncing had some problems, that doesn't necessarily mean that they didn't have some things figured out. All of the teachers and preachers I know that are teaching Dispensational Hermeneutics and pre-tribulation eschatology are using the Bible, and usually the KJV to back up their position. He also seems to have something against the KJV, which is the only English language translation that is trustworthy in my opinion. But perhaps he just doesn't like the Schofield etc editions. If salvation is only by the (correct) Gospel as Paul taught, then apparently nobody prior to the New Testament was saved? We all need to be discerning. He is entirely correct that the Masons are a very dangerous organization, and they promote very bad doctrines. 🙏✝️👑✝️🙏
This is right on. 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 says that Satan's servants masquerade as apostles of Christ. The 4th commandment has never changed and Hebrews 4:1-13 proves it. There is no Sunday mandate in the bible. Sunday is a pagan worship day. James 2:10 says that to stumble at any point of the law is the same as breaking it all. You have to be in all truth or else you settle for some lie.
There is a dichotomy here. I agree with the idea that dispensationalism is dangerous and wrong theology. I agree that the most dangerous part of dispensationalism is that it states that much of what Jesus said is not for Christians. All of it is for Christians. However, I do not see that this pastor has fully realized what the implications of that are. If every part of the Bible is for us than you cannot escape the Sermon on the Mount. That sermon is directed at us. If we are saved by grace alone, than we can ignore the Sermon on the Mount in our lives both public and private lives anyway we want, we could even be gay or drink or be addicted to drugs or commit crimes and it cannot effect our salvation. If however, there are sins that cannot be accepted in the church, then no sin can be accepted in the church, including failure to feed the hungry, help the poor, or visit the incarcerated. There is a very strong dichotomy today in the church and this guy is onto it but there is a ways to go.
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. New Covenant Whole Gospel: Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. Watch the RUclips videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
That is what Jesus said that we are to love our neighbors as ourself and that doesn't mean you're next door neighbor that means go and read about the Samaritan where the priest and the levite passed a man laying on the side of the road had been beaten almost to death and robbed and left to die but the Samaritan bandaged his wounds and took him to an end and told the innkeeper give him whatever he needs and when I return I will pay you because he was the Good Samaritan that is how we are supposed to look at those that are in trouble that are lost that are in need of a glass of water a coat a place to lay their not to pass them by and leave them laying on the street.
The globalists at the "World Economic Forum" have said by 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be "happy". Meanwhile many in the modern Church claim we do not need to be concerned about global government. The truth is found below. What does an understanding of the New Covenant do to the Pretrib Rapture doctrine? Since the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20, how is the New Covenant Church age going to end seven years before the Second Coming of Christ? Why would anyone think God is going back to the Old Covenant system now made “obsolete” by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13? We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it. The Capitol "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found. In Revelation 12:11 we find those under the blood of the Lamb. A person cannot be under the blood of the Lamb and not be a part of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ. Verse 12 of this passage proves at least part of the tribulation period is the wrath of Satan upon the people of God. Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time. "It may come as a surprise to most pre-Trib prophecy students that the post-Trib position (in its primitive form) is the oldest point of view." (The quotation above is from the book "Will You Escape The Tribulation? RAPTURE [Under Attack]", by Tim LaHaye, copyright 1998, Page 197.) Tim LaHaye was co-author of the “Left Behind” books and movies which have convinced millions of modern Christians that the Church age ends seven years before the Second Coming of Christ. Recently, Pastor Matt Furse of Mountain View Baptist Church in Custer, S.D. has written a book titled “Which One Is Right?’, which reveals the recent history of the pretrib rapture doctrine, and the fact it does not agree with what is written in the King James Bible. The gathering of the Church is described at the end of 1 Thess. Chapter 4, and the timing of the event is found in chapter 5. The word “But” in the first verse of chapter 5 connects the two chapters, and the words “we” and “sleep” in verse 10 of chapter 5 prove the two chapters are connected. The Greek words for “wrath” and “tribulation” are not the same word, as proven by the verse below. Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ. Watch the RUclips video “Pretribulation Paradox” by former pretrib believer skydiver626.
Darby, Scofield and Larkin didn't go fore enough. The "gospel of Grace" in opposite to the "gospel of the Kingdom" is one of the aspects of "Rightly dividing the Word or Truth". Otherwise you have to explain a lot of contradiction in the Word of God. God bless.
@@ScripturesAndScience *One gospel Acts 19:10 KJV [10] And this continued by the space of two years; so that all they which dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks.
The issue of bible versions was not that prevalent back then. Not so many versions. Wasn't as much of an issue. So there was not the material proof we have now. Larkin was great. Yes he did go to the R.V sometimes. But God used him greatly to provide light on end times prophecy. Way ahead of his time. Got most of it right in my opinion.
The most ironic claim by those who study history only long enough to satisfy their viewpoint. Darby never started dispensationism, as we know its mentioned four times in Paul's epistles - the Biblical proof. The historical proof - 1828 Websters dictionary in which Noah Webster( A christian) began compiling in 1807 - #4. dictionary explanation for dispensation - That which is dispensed or bestowed. A system of principles and rites enjoined. As the Mosaic dispensation; the gospel dispensation; including the former the Levitical Law and rites, the latter the scheme of the redemption of Christ. How much clearer and precise does history have to be?
@@LawofLiberty I can quote Paul's epistles over and over that clearly state "works" will not provide salvation, but why bother. Until you spend as much time studying the epistles of Paul as you probably have elsewhere you shall never comprehend the gospel of grace. All the Bible is to us, for doctrine, reproof, correction and righteousness but only the epistles of Paul are for us...in the dispensation we now reside. My question is can you count? How many gospel's are listed in this passage? Galatians 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; If I was a wagering man(which I am not)would bet you will twist this passage to suit your position, instead of taking it literally, just like 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH Dispensational believers take the Bible in a more literal manner. That being said, if your chosen path for salvation comes through works and not in faith alone in Christ blood for salvation, you will have an opportunity for remission of your sins if you make it through the tribulation period, via temple sacrifices during the millennial kingdom, having a earthly first estate. Personally I prefer a heavenly first estate with a body of light.
@@ScripturesAndScience You might as well be a Jehovah's Witness with that heretical B.S. You seek to denigrate the Salvation of Christ's sacrifice with future animal sacrifices, yet talk about rightly dividing the word of truth. I pray that you escape that delusion asap.
@@kenforesight9875 I would have thought the more important point was that i refuted Scripture and Science's claim that people will be saved in the future through animal sacrifices, which makes Christ's sacrifice nought. I wonder about the placement of your heart. You agree with him ?
Darby family members had lived in the most hunted castle called 'Leap Castle' in 18-21centuries. The early residents O`Carolls could be of giant race. Darby's latter fam meber was also an occult nobelist. A pile of bones found under a dungeon. The history of this castle is demonic. The dark spirit ppl were drawn to the Leap Castle. Look at Darby he look very possesed. Even Scofield, he has a different spirit, NOT the Holy Spirit. (btw, my gift is discerning.) >>The O’Carrolls, princes of Ely, whose chief stronghold this castle was, were all big men, in face, a race of giants, as the few relics of them extant attest. >>A little below this is a remarkable room, which none of the servants will enter after nightfall. It was a state bedroom of one of the princess of Ely, who was murdered six centuries ago by her lord, and the solid oak door retains the bloodstains of the royal victim. This part of the building is reputed to be haunted >>A gothic horror writer who often featured the castle in her work, Mrs. Darby was also fascinated by the occult. She conducted multiple séances in the castle’s corridors, and some believe that her communications with the other side is what awoke the Elemental.
Without the teaching of Darby? Without the theaching of Scofield? Without the teachings of Larkin? BUT ONLY WITH YOUR TEACHINGS? The church was not known in OT Eph 3:2-13. It started on pentecostal. There was a time of innocense Adam and Eve they needed not to be saved by grace before they had sin. So how the church existed from creation? Please rightly divide The Word.
eugenius kubiczek the church DID exist in the old testament. Church simply means assembly, or CONGREGATION, as the OT puts it. You've been deceived by wolves.
In the KJV Jesus said :"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."= Future tens
eugenius kubiczek Amen brother. Dispensationalism is the only way to read the bible. Once it's fully understood these clowns are soooo easy to spot... but extremely vexing to listen to.
Galatians 5 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. I have confidence in you through the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded: but he that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be. And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased. I would they were even cut off which trouble you. For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law. Galatians 3 Oh foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain. He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. Galatians 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, LET HIM BE ACCURSED.
The first part of your paragraph proves dispensation, a division of the scripture from Old Testament and New. Just like we dont stone people to death for adultery in the New Testament. I like the dispensation teacher I listen to. He does not teach anything this pastor is talking about that is bad and does study and think for himself. but this is good teaching also. Dr. Gene Kim. Bible teacher of dispensation. The Bible is Awesome.
@@BeckyCathell My Quotation from Scripture has NOTHING to do with Dispensation but with the UNIQUE and ONLY Gospel of Salvation given by Jesus Himself to Paul: Salvation is BY FAITH ONLY in the COMPLETED and SUFFICIENT WORK that Jesus performed in The Cross, and NOT BY WORKS. It is FAITH plus NOTHING. The second anyone ADDS ANYTHING to the Gospel DEFILES IT, and hence is subject to Galatians 1:8: BE ACCURSED, BE DAMNED, BY GOD, not by anyone else. BY GOD. Dispensation? IS THE LGIC CONCLUSION IF A BELIEVER READS THE SCRIPTURE PROPERLY. Whatever else is FOOLISHNESS. I know a lot of uneducated, scholarly DISINFORMED, SCRIPTURALLY ILLITERATE, like the one in this video, who calls us BORN AGAIN, SAVED BELIEVERS, INDWELLED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, REPROBATES. THEY WILL HAVE TO FACE JESUS and THE PUNISHMENT THEREIN.
How do you know this? Bible says Solomon paid King of Tyre and his helpers build it. They was worshippers of Baal. but does not mean they are demons. maybe had demons. God told Solomon to build the Temple. I would like to know the Biblical interpretations of the Temple. I know the Kabbalah one and it is false. God told King David how to build the Temple. measurements and such. King of Tyre did not worship the Lord, but he was freinds with King David also. I would like to know when / and why the glory of God left the Ark of the Covenant? Was it about the time Solomon started with his Idols?? anyone?
Many generations have wondered if it's thend of the world or living in the last days. Right now, things are precarious here in America and on fire in other parts of the world. The last days spoken of by Christ and His apostles, however, were speaking of the end of the OT age or eon. The sacrificial system was drawing to a close. Jerusalem, the temple and it's priesthood were utterly destroyed during THEIR tribulation. It wrapped up in AD 70. Secular history confirms these events. More importantly, Christ and His apostles speak to the first generation timeline over 100 times in the NT. As the end of the OT days, the NT or age of grace was ushered in. The Kingdom of God (heaven) has been a reality for some two thousand years now. It's spiritual and everlasting. The world is without end. Grace and peace to you.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
@@SpotterVideo So glad to see you show up here brother! I see your comments on a good many videos and your thorough explanations are very helpful! God bless!
The book of Hebrews Hebrews was written to people that are already saved on how they should live, not teaching you can be saved better good works, and not teaching you cal lose everlasting life. Hebrews 10: 26 KJV For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, Jesus died once for all sins, he is trying to teach the Hebrews that they don't need to make a yearly sacrifice for sin there was a payment made once and for all.
Wish I would have known this years ago, but God brings us through things for a reason. What is your church website? I dont have one here. So much deception. :( Few if any want to listen to the warnings. No discernment.
I thought the verse "ye might bear with him" means that they might get deceived by the false doctrine. Bearing with someone is when you listen to them and tolerate them. "be patient or tolerant with." according to Google. I hadn't heard that bearing with him meant we would contend with them.
There is no HELL, that's a false translation, among hundreds in the KJV, the correct translation is the word grave. Darby started the fallacy of a rapture, you have it correct regarding the nonsense of dispensation. It is false teaching to say after death one goes to Heaven or Hell, we wait in the grave for the resurrection of the righteous before the millennium and the wicked are judged after the millennium Rev 20
Demons are the nephillim, the fallen angels are bound but in Enoch it says will be loosed after a time And it says demons are the children of the fallen angels
Nephilim is merely Hebrew for "heroes", "giants", impressive persons, even bullies, ... Just look some good dictionary up. Using alien words doesn't make a concept smarter. And Genesis merely says that sons of men (born of the flesh, unbelievers) had daughters. And it says there were also "sons of God". Like children of God. If you are a believer you are a "child of God". So, basically believers started to marry daughters of unbelievers. And their offspring became terrible bullies. Filled with the bad morals and ideas of the unbelieving grandfathers, but mixed with some outward aspects of the believers. And out of that they became warriors, bullying others, founding mighty cities and early armies. Nephilim = giants, bullies, early fascist leaders.
The book of enough is an occultist source, square to anything you can find in the Bible, although it's using some biblical names and terminologies in between its cabalist doctrine.
@@chrise842 Deuteronomy 2:10-11 KJV: "10) The Enims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and TALL, as the Anakims, 11) Which were also accounted giants, as the Anakims, but the Moabites call them Emims. Deuteronomy 2:20-21 KJV: "20) That also was accounted a land of giants: giants dwelt there in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; 21) A people great, and many, and TALL, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead" And let's not forget Goliath, unless of course you think he was just your average sized soldier?? Not to be sarcastic, but how much of His Word do you actually believe is literal? Do you believe in a flood that covered the whole earth? Or the literal physical bodily resurrection of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ! If we start doubting what the text says, we are led to all sorts of ideas that are formulated by men. Dispensationalists don't do that. This entire video is a smear campaign against true bible believing men, who were not perfect, but were also not evil.
Sorry if these are old questions. My mom believes in this Jewish chosenness and Jews returning to the Jewish State central to the Coming of Jesus. Here in America, I understand this all comes from the Scofield Study Bible. I have several questions: Has the Scofield doctrine infiltrated into her King James Bible? Or is it just how her KJB scripture is interpreted? Or are there different versions of the KJB and how would you identity the correct version to get the true Word of God? I believe this is such an important issue in these days. Thank You.
Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” Note the word HEAVEN (singular) found in the KJV, most other false bibles, replace the word heaven by heavens (plural), God allowed for this waterproof mark to happen on the very first verse of His Holy Word for a reason..... Galatians 3 : 16.
Scofield used a given Bible translation and added commentary below it. Maybe he made some changes to the translation, too. And I guess he inserted countless headlines between the paragraphs of the Bible chapters.
@@chrise842 You do realize that nearly all of the dispensational preaching that was done for a very very long time, was done by preachers who viewed the King James Bible as the ultimate authority right? The greatest defender of the King James Bible was a Bible believing dispensationalist and he never once proclaimed that Scofield or Larkin were 100% accurate in every detail. Nor did he claim himself to be. But this guy and every one of his kind hate the man and literally claim that he is burning in hell! This great man was named Peter S. Ruckman! The NIFB is wrong on so many levels, and just because they are KJVO does not make them right.
She probably believes that because she read the Bible (KJV), Gen 12,15,17,26,28, God's covenant with Israel for the land, God never breaks a covenant (man can) , so Israel will someday have there promised land. Probably not until after the 7 years of Jacob's trouble yet to come.
Bill Wilson,. How can you deny God's plan for the remnant of Israel? If God gave up on His remnant of Israel He would have to give up on believers today. We are no better
That verse you read in 1 Peter is Jewish, in the old testament God wanted Israel to be a kingdom of priests, and the other language used such as the sprinkling of blood, all Jewish. Paul never refers to the body of Christ as a holy nation or any such thing.
YOU ARE WRONG: 1 Peter 1: 1 KJV Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the *strangers* scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
"Rosicrucian" means actually the "rose on the Cross" - by which is Rose =Life -- i.e. the Negation of Death viz. Death is the Negation of Life, thus that when Jesus died on the Crucifix Jesus became the Christ -- Negation of Negation = Affirmation of Life: the Christ taking upon Himself the Sin of humanity (sacrificial Lamb/ scapegoat) : the negation of sin and death viz. Christ Conquest of death resulting in sinless Eternal Life, without Sin
Bla blah! The cross of the rose was Luthers personal coat of arms he designed for himself. It had five parts like a rose flower, signifying certain aspects of his theology. A golden ring around it and mainly Christ's cross that brought salvation in the center of it. Forget your rose is life rubbish. What Luther just had as a fun emblem to try to teach also here in symbols what he preached daily in countless letters, sermons, university lectures, bible commentaries, children's catechism etc. was turned into some stupid cabalist mystic secrets by some corrupted and too well connected officials many years after him. Luther hated hidden secrets and made the biblical Gospel accessible to the children of the simplest peasants and to house maidens and simple work crew. Your cabalist friends mimicked his lingo and turned it into something of old satanic Egyptian mysteries into which only some corrupt rich fucks can be secretly initiated. You are enemies of the plain and simple Gospel of Christs forgiveness, out of Rosicrucianism came the darkest and murderous illuminati covens into which today's antichristian elites are heavily tied. Stop fooling us!
When you begin your sermon by misappropriating scripture, that is where you lose me. The warning in Revelation is referring to the book of Revelation, not the whole Bible. As for your attack on a believer that has been dead for almost 100 years and cannot defend himself, I see this as a means of attempting to lift yourself on a pedestal. C.I. Scofield was not guilty of changing the Bible. He added notes and a study system to a KJV Bible. If you disagree with some of his notes or teachings, then chew the meat and spit out the bones. Don't slander the man's name and call him a false prophet. Please show me in the Scofield Study Bible where a prophecy was written that did not come to pass. You can't, because he never claimed to be a prophet. If it is a question about some of his teachings, then ignore it. Don't drag the man's name through the mud while using it as a pedestal to exalt yourself. That is hypocrisy. The Scofield Study Bible has been an instrument of God for almost 100 years. Listening to you and others only drives me closer to the Bible that I have used for decades. Thank you for your encouraging sermon.
Spurgeon warned everyone to stay clear of them and their heresies. Are you saying Spurgeon is a liar? We are called to expose deception whether the person is alive or dead. If you have been preaching from this bible then you, Pastor Brett are also teaching heresies. I would suggest you look into history and learn the truth and repent before you are judged for leading God's sheep to hell with false doctrine.
Pastor Brett Hmmm A so called pastor that has confidence in a man that was unfit to stand behind a pulpit... Did you know that he wrote his erronous book rightly dividing the word of truth just before abandoning his wife and children... Did you know that he was a member of the lotus club (A group of unbelieving Jewish lawyers) Antichrists! Dispensation is stewardship... You keep on belching up poison and misleading people in your evidently biblically illiterate congregation... You will pay a big price... Read your bible and throw away the commentary... Especially the Schofield footnotes... He didn't even believe the KJV was a superior version... He wanted to use the Revised version... Look for yourself how he clearly attacks scripture in his footnotes and says this or that verse was omitted in the older better manuscripts... He relied upon the Alexandrian cult text Vaticanus /Sinaiticus...
The new IFB because they reject charismatic gifts for today (I think) reinterpret prophesy/prophet to preaching /preacher. That is why they can say those they disagree with are false prophets and reprobates.
Also because of the doctrine of preservation they see The KJV with out outside input as the standard. So to say the passage in Revelation is only for Revelation viewed as you changing the text.
I am confused but didn't Jesus say "Repent and believe" in His first sermon along with counting the cost of following Him before following Him. And Peter's first sermon on Pentecost he told them to repent. Repentance doesn't save as you still need a blood sacrifice and Christ did that but it is commanded in the Bible- not a good suggestion- commanded. And what about the 7 churches of Asia Minor that Jesus warned severely if they didn't repent? That was back in that time AFTER His resurrection, not some future dispensation as some dispensationalsts teach. One of the churches He said He would blot out their name out of the Book of Life if they didn't get right. He never said they weren't Christians. I have never heard a good sermon explaining any of these passages and I am only naming a few of many passages that I can name. Even the parable of the seed and the sower says "..they believed for a while.." which means they didn't continue in the faith. Also, aren't Darby, Scofield and Larkin saved according to the once-saved always saved doctrine?
Sacred Cowtipper none of those passages make any sense without dispensations. Rightly dividing does mean something. The Jews could lose salvation in the old testament. David said after sinning a couple great sins like murder and adultery: Lord take not thine Holy Spirit from me. The Spirit did depart from King Saul so he wound up going to see a witch. Today in the church age made up of primarily gentiles we are sealed by the Holy Spirit. When we get saved we become new creatures in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17). Our new man does not sin. I have never sinned since I got saved though my flesh does sometimes. See Romans chapter 7. That is why Paul said he kept his body (his flesh) in subjection. Once saved always saved is true for this church age dispensation. But folks in the old testament and during tribulation can lose their salvation. That explains falling away and being once enlightened (Hebrews). Also explains Revelation passages. Any more questions feel free.
Sacred Cowtipper, You easily tipped over the eternal security cow. They must have very itchy ears to want to listen to such a blatant lie. The Baptist with their eternal security doctrine of devils have done more damage than all the other wolves put together.
You repent by acknowledging the law condemning you, as a reply to that you believe in the Gospel of Christ taking your condemnation vicariously upon himself at the cross and giving you life and forgiveness when rising from the dead again. There you have your repent and believe.
Does God deals with us differently? If not what does Hebrews 1:1,2 means? Hebrews 1:1,2 Heb 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; KJV
Read Galatians 3 : 16 to find out WHO is The person (singular) who the ultimate recipient of The promises of God were promised to, once you understand that, The whole Old Testament will become a supporting document to the New Testament and to The Real Salvation Plan found ALONE in Jesus Christ to ALL of humanity...
@@pablovaldez5550 We are both in accord brother, THAT IS the only true Gospel of Salvation found in Jesus The Christ ALONE, Galatians 3 : 16 more than ratifies that the promises were given to Abraham and to HIS SEED as of ONE and NOT as of many, and Jesus being THAT SEED, and because of BELIEF, ALL that make Jesus their savior for their souls are ALSO inheritants of the the promises of God through Christ Jesus, no matter our background, nationality or race, but, as The Bible teaches, there will be a falling away from the faith (if you ask me, I believe it has already started for some time) in the later times, let us remind the brethren of THE SIMPLICITY of The Gospel of Salvation found ALONE in JESUS CHRIST. ALL The Glory be to GOD in the highest. Saludos y Bendiciones...
@@pablovaldez5550 Wow!!!, I visited your channel, and saw your video about "idol worship" also read, most of the comments on that video, I did learn a lot about you, have any of the ideas you posted on those messages have changed in the past 2 years? By reading the comments of those two persons you were communicating with, I have arrived to the conclusion that they were both judaizers or self professed jews (although, you asked straight up, and they denied it), whenever, anybody starts using the name of yashua or yeshua (to refer to JESUS), then it raises a red flag with me big time, also, one of them would NOT accept The Biblical Trinity, nor confirm That Jesus IS GOD (another judaizing false gospel trait), it more than confirms that ANOTHER gospel is being introduced among the christian churches that is leading most congregants to depart from the True Faith, with that being said, I was pleasently surprised to learn from your comments in your own video that you rely on the 1602 spanish version, now, for close to 5 years, I have discarded my old reina valera 1960 edition and relied solely in the Valera 1602 Purificada, when it comes to the spanish language Bible, I have also contacted the Church in Mexico and spoken to The Pastor of this incredible endeavour on bringing back The 1602 Purificada back to light, The Lord used me as well, to bring this Bible version to my local christian book store, where ever since then, it has been a best seller among the brethren in my community (I did NOT profit financially from this Godly task), it is wild to understand, that the Valera 1602 Purificada, PRECEEDES 9 full years the KJV Bible that came out in 1611, but, since we are in an english speaking country, the importance of the Valera Purificada 1602 has NOT received much attention, it is amazing to compare both Bibles (the 1602 and The KJV 1611) and how miraculously they support each other in their content!!!!. I have also read your comments about your family being catholic and how they reject The True Gospel of Salvation found in Jesus ALONE, I can also relate wholeheartedly, but understand this, no one is a prophet in his own land, even Jesus' message, was NOT received among his own hometown, therefore, I will pray for The Lord to send a Bible Believing messenger to your family members, so they can hear The Gospel of Salvation through Jesus, from the lips of Another person, also below, pls. Find a writting that I have used in the past to offer to roman catholics. I pray that our communication does NOT end and that we can continue sharing Biblical knowledge among each other. QUESTIONS TO ASK CATHOLICS -Who came into the world to save sinners, Jesus or Mary? -Who is the sinner's best friend? -When Mary and Jesus were on earth, did Jesus invite sinners to come unto himself or to Mary for their salvation? -Does the Bible show anywhere a sinner afraid to go to Jesus, and in turn asks Mary to approach Jesus to help him out? -The thief on the cross next to Jesus, did he do well to talk to Jesus or to Mary standing at his feet? -If Jesus loved sinners more than Mary did when He was on the earth and since Jesus is up in Heaven now, has He lost any of that superior, divine love and mercy that he had for lost sinners? -Then, if Jesus is my best friend, why shouldn"t I go directly to Him instead of Mary? -Why should anyone go to someone who is inferior in power, love and mercy for my salvation? -And if your RCC teaches you that mary is the mother of God and all wise, then, why don't you obey her and " do everything that He (Jesus) tells you to do" like she instructed people to do while she was alive? -Jesus never revered mary nor called her "mother", but instead chose to call her woman. Then, after ministering to them, pray to God to open their eyes and free their souls from the lies of the roman catholic institution, As true Christians, we know that the truth is found in the pages of his unchanging and ALL powerful Word The KJV Bible, all these poor people have to do is loose their lives and souls for eternity in hell and in the lake of fire, they need to stop placing their trust in man made dogma or in fairy tales created to subjugate and enslave them, share with them the knowledge that the final authority in everything Holy is The Bible, salvation is found within it's pages. 1 Timothy 2 : 5, 6 5 For there is one God, and ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. Acts 4 : 10, 11, 12. 10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. 11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. 12 Neither is there salvation IN ANY OTHER: for there is NONE OTHER NAME under heaven given among men, whereby WE MUST BE SAVED.
Just want everyone who doesnt realize it to know. Hebrews is written to Hebrews/ Jews. Not Christians. There are many flase teachers out there. I just watched one. Please use the holy spirit to discern. Dispensations are in the bible regardless of what any man says. Read it through and study 2 tim 2:15 and rightly divide the word of truth.
This "gospel of grace", "gospel of the kingdom", "the kingdom of God", "the kingdom of Christ" is nothing more than divisive gibberish. John 10:16 "And other sheep (the Gentiles) I have, which are not of this fold: (the Jews), them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold (of both Jews and Gentiles) and one shepherd (Jesus Christ). Eph 2:14 "For he is our peace, who hath made both (Jews and Gentiles) one (one body), and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us (Jews and Gentiles);" Eph 4:4-6, "There is one body(of Jews and Gentiles), and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all." Gal 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek (Gentile) there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus." Rom 16:17 "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause DIVISIONS and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and AVOID them."
The physical Jews are not gods chosen people, Christians are. (Matthew 21:42-43) (1 Peter 2:7-9) If anyone is in Christ, then he is counted for the seed of Abraham and the promises are then made to him as well. (Galatians 3:28-29) (Galatians 3:16) A Jew is one who is in Christ, not of the physical circumcision. (Romans 2:28-29) The rapture happens after the tribulation. (Matthew 24:29-31) (1 Corinthians 15:52) there is only one gospel, not multiple. Peter, Paul, and Jesus all preached the same gospel. (Galatians 1:8-9)The kingdom of heaven and kingdom of God are literally the same thing and used interchangeably. (Matthew 19:23-24) Jews were never saved by the law. (Galatians 3:21-22) (Romans 10:30-33) In fact, Paul is quoting Habakkuk 2:4 in Galatians 3:11. Also Galatians 3:8-9. The irony is that these people parrot 2 Timothy 2:15 like a mantra yet don’t even divide the truth rightly themselves. There is so much about dispensationalism that any Christian couldn’t agree with. Studying the scriptures, one would never conclude dispensationalism. Is that enough for you? It's not hard debunking dispensationalism. These men were of dubious character and despised the KJV.
One little error to correct sir. The Rosicrucian movement was not from or in the Roman Catholic Church. It was closely associated with Lutherans and Church of England. Read the Rosicrucian Manifestos ; they condemn the Pope and seek a reformation of all things.
They weren't true confessional Lutherans, just focusing on the traditional symbolism and some perverted terminology of it. Confessional Lutheranism is THE Sola scriptura, Sola fide movement per se. True confessional Lutherans abhor the teachings of Rosicrucianism. Back then among Protestant princes masonic ideas were made popular to allegedly fight against the romish counterpart. Indeed they were lured into that. And it were mighty officials in the slowly corrupted, still state aligned Lutheran regions coming up with such ideas. Confessional Lutheranism has almost completely left those structures by now, was heavily persecuted by them and led to new Sola scriptura based churches, mainly in the US.
"reformation of all things" is subversive language to convince Protestants that this mystic occultism would be biblical. They were kind of early illuminati and it's not very different from today's Tikun Olam teachings. Actually they share their inspirational sources: cabalism.
@@chrise842 You are wrong in assuming that Qabala is subversive of the Gospel. You should realize that the verses and prophecies used by the writers of the Gospels to show Jesus as the Messiah were all based on Qabalistic methodology. They cannot be used in their original context but had to be taken out of context and interpreted mystically. Without mysticism, the idea that the crucifixion and resurrection of the Messiah, saves a person when they apply faith, makes no sense.
@@thenowchurch6419 rest assured you will burn in hell eternally, ny sweet wordsmith, rhetor and sophist! How many people reject the graciousness of God!
The bible says that we are sealed unto the day of redemption and that if any man take the mark of the beast he will go to hell guaranteed?? How can you reconcile these two scriptures without a change in dispensation??, unless saved people can take the mark of the beast and loose the seal of God thus loosing the salvation that isn't by works??
If your title represents your true position You just trashed the Philadelphia Church Then, you exalted the Laodecian church which the LORD says he will spew out of His mouth into the tribulation Do you think today's church is "right"? Your position is entirely untenable.
Thus video is not correct neither..Darby was Anglican not Catholic and Catholic do not mention the rapture neither that the Pope is millennium on earth.
The angel s made the decision to fallow Satan before they left heaven from God from rebellion toward God and only sin to keep u from heaven is not believing acts 16 31
There's a lot of truth to this but there's a lot of your own perception of what Jesus is saying and meaning... And it's a little confusing and confusion is not true, So we can all have our different opinions about the word of God so we should all pray for the truth to be revealed and know the truth instead of listening to one person idea of it but a lot of this is not right....
So if this preacher doesn't believe in dispensations I guess he is still under the law! The Old and New Testament proves there are at least two dispensations!
Salvation has always been by faith, Old and New Testament Acts 10: 43 KJV To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
@@LawofLiberty Salvation wasnt possible until the blood was shed , there's no one in the old testament saved by the blood of the lamb , remission of sin is not the same as salvation its one component of it ,
Apostle Paul was a persecutor of Christians, after seeing the glory of Jesus, he became a Christian and an Apostle of Christ. But his roots were in Judaism, therefore he include some Judaism in his writings.
But later, he compared ALL of his "judaism" to DUNG, The Bible, clearly shows that Paul underwent an "evolution" in faith through time, first, although he was called by God to take The Gospel to the gentiles, Paul was hoping that by doing so, he will bring jelousy to his "own people" (the jews), hoping, that they would receive The Gospel of Salvation of The Lord Jesus Christ, also, The Bible gives details of how Paul erroneusly circumcised Thimoteus (by the pressure of the judaizers), so young Timotheus could enter into jerusalem, but later, Paul himself declared that circumcision does NOT benefit those redeemed by The Blood of Christ and should NOT be circumcised at ALL, also, after Paul was persecuted, jailed and stoned numerous times by the jews, he finally gave up on the idea to continue taking The Gospel to the jews, and decided to "take it to the gentiles" exclusevily. also, he started talking about the jews as a distant and separate group of people, like he did not feel a connection or bond with them anymore, after ALL sorts of persecution by his own ethnic people (the jews), he finally realized that being a Christian (a follower of Christ) was what it really mattered. Philippians 3 : 2 to 8 2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION. 3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE FLESH. 4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. 7 But what things were gain to me, those I COUNTED LOSS FOR CHRIST. 8 Yea doubtless, and I COUNT ALL THINGS BUT LOSS FOR THE EXCELLENCY OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF CHRIST JESUS MY LORD: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but DUNG, that I may win Christ,
some Jews follow strictly the Torah, you can not lump all jews as under the talmud. I am Christain an listen to some Torah teachers as long as they dont teach Kabbalah.
Everytime I scroll this man appears "critizing" everyone and anything. Wouldn't it be better to go out into the real world, find a job, earn an honest wage and be a witness to those who are perishing without Christ
WOW this young man is so wrong. He probably doesn't like God's plans for the remnant of Israel God will NOT put His church through the tribulation. The tribulation will be horrific
The globalists at the "World Economic Forum" have said by 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be "happy". Meanwhile many in the modern Church claim we do not need to be concerned about global government. The truth is found below. What does an understanding of the New Covenant do to the Pretrib Rapture doctrine? Since the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20, how is the New Covenant Church age going to end seven years before the Second Coming of Christ? Why would anyone think God is going back to the Old Covenant system now made “obsolete” by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13? We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it. The Capitol "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found. In Revelation 12:11 we find those under the blood of the Lamb. A person cannot be under the blood of the Lamb and not be a part of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ. Verse 12 of this passage proves at least part of the tribulation period is the wrath of Satan upon the people of God. Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time. "It may come as a surprise to most pre-Trib prophecy students that the post-Trib position (in its primitive form) is the oldest point of view." (The quotation above is from the book "Will You Escape The Tribulation? RAPTURE [Under Attack]", by Tim LaHaye, copyright 1998, Page 197.) Tim LaHaye was co-author of the “Left Behind” books and movies which have convinced millions of modern Christians that the Church age ends seven years before the Second Coming of Christ. Recently, Pastor Matt Furse of Mountain View Baptist Church in Custer, S.D. has written a book titled “Which One Is Right?’, which reveals the recent history of the pretrib rapture doctrine, and the fact it does not agree with what is written in the King James Bible. The gathering of the Church is described at the end of 1 Thess. Chapter 4, and the timing of the event is found in chapter 5. The word “But” in the first verse of chapter 5 connects the two chapters, and the words “we” and “sleep” in verse 10 of chapter 5 prove the two chapters are connected. The Greek words for “wrath” and “tribulation” are not the same word, as proven by the verse below. Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ. Watch the RUclips video “Pretribulation Paradox” by former pretrib believer skydiver626.
The middle point the anchoring basis for Christianity is martyrdom a living being had to die for the sins of all men and women so that’s the conceptual basis forever and for always good life will be hard ugly and mean and that’s how you based your life wow
I read somewhere that the Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew and the New Testament was written in Greek. Saying they changed the Hebrew to Greek. So it’s not completely the same meaning anymore? That the Old Testament was for the Jews to understand and their way of life . The New Testament was written to teach the gentiles? Can you please explain the difference? You are saying it’s for all yet we shouldn’t follow the law? I’m confused .
Theresa Heller Check out Unlearn the lies by Lex Meyer. I believe the whole Bible is for everyone. I had a baptist preacher tell me the red letters were for the Jews!!! Most churches have most things wrong. Unlearn the lies, trunews are two sites that have most things right.
Ok. The Old Testament was speaking to the people of the Hebrew speaking Israelites. God used them as a nation back then until Christ came to exemplify basic theological ideas. They're later referenced as symbols/examples in the New Testament. While that he also gave them secular laws as a nation and practical rules for everyday life. As back then the full truth as in the New Testament wasn't there yet, he gave them also a very guided way on how to do worship. That contained back then a lot of physical activity and objects. That's how you learn. These two latter parts were then no more needed because Jesus himself arrived, explained everything, fulfilled everything, gave the Holy Spirit for better understanding. New Testament Christians are more "abstract" kind of. We believe Jesus died for our sins and rose from the dead. But imagine telling someone in the Old Testament times: one day someone will come and be killed in your place and that is giving you already now forgiveness. Instead God thought it would be wise to teach them very practically: * You are a sinner, separated from God * The price of sin is death * But God came up with a solution: he will replace the one to be killed * Not the sinner is dying, but in his mercy God allows to exchange you for a clean animal to be sacrificed once a year (= important part of OT worship) * But punishment was necessary, but grace allowed to have someone/something else in your place * At the same time God pointed out already that this is just a teaching example for back then and the real thing still to come * God became man himself to let himself be killed instead of us * Since Jesus came, all these physical examples in the reoccurring worship were no more necessary Also with the real thing walking in person on earth there was no need anymore for a sample nation to exemplify religious ideas via physical symbols that became perverted over time. So, both the secular government parts/practical life rules as well as the old symbolic/physical worship rites were abolished in the New Testament. They are only used as theoretical examples from history in the New Testament. Now the main things in worship are preaching the Bible (it's core the law and Gospel), and two slightly physical things: baptism with the WORD and water and the supper with bread and wine and Christ's body and blood present in it. Today we're "merely" circumcised on the heart, crossing the Red Sea in our baptism symbolically, Jesus being our Passover lamb, no slaughterhouse in the church necessary anymore. The OT temple was a huge slaughterhouse operation. Countless animals sacrificed in a day. We don't need that anymore. God used it in his wisdom back then for their limited understanding.
The New Testament was written in Koine Greek by St. Paul, a well educated former jewish rabbi living in different parts of the Roman empire. Koine Greek was something like common English, the world language back then. Further St. Luke was a Roman himself, writing an account on what happened in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts, other writers of the NT were exiled to other parts of the Roman empire. Like St. John, St. Peter, etc. And, yes, the audience was now no more mainly the one nation to exemplify religious concepts in a very drastic physical way. But now, since the feast of Pentecost (Book of Acts), all nations were invited to come to the table. Also now the single person was addressed more directly. Before there was more dealing with the leaders of a nation, of a family, a tribe. Now the harvest out of all nations. Today God would use English as koine Greek was the world language. And Luke definitely never started out in Hebrew and translated later because his mother tongue never was Hebrew. And as Palestine was under Roman rule all the apostles were definitely capable of speaking koine Greek the world language back then. It's again funny myths that it all started differently and we would need some back to what no one knows Hebrew and then come again into our modern languages. That's the Hebrew New Testament movement. They don't show how they got there. They just make you believe that this is what they might have said in Hebrew instead and now here it is in English. There's no reason to doubt the content of the very early Greek manuscripts we have in fragments even from the time of the apostles and their direct students sitting at their feet. There's 10.000s of manuscripts scattered all over the Mediterranean sea region from the earliest moments. Faking impossible.
@@Joe-mk3ii unlearn the lies may be the biggest liar out there! Oh the irony is so thick anymore! That guys sole mission is to put you back under the law by claiming that we can't trust the word of God! And yes, he uses Scripture to prove his point, but so does every cult leader! Jesus is the Word and the Word proclaims that those who are in Christ are no longer under the law. Romans 10:4: "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth" He is a deciever of the worst kind! My goodness!
And how does the Messiah return to the temple and bring Deliverance to Zion less you completely misuse words right how does the Messiah drool from his throne in in Zion how did the Jews fulfill the promises to the latter half of the book of all the prophets to be restored to their own land
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it. Watch the RUclips videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay.
Not at all it's covenant theology that falls apart. The covenant is a land promise. Israel has never possessed the land. The Temple has to be rebuilt. Water must flow from it.
@@morganfrmn Do you think Joshua was confused below? Jos 21:43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein. In the passage below Jesus said the "son" is the "heir" to the land and the kingdom would be taken from those who reject Him as the "chief cornerstone" and it would be given to another nation bearing fruit. Mat 21:37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son. Mat 21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance. Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him. Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen? Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons. Mat 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Mat 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. That "holy nation" which accepts the "chief cornerstone" is found below. 1Pe 2:4 To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of God, and precious, 1Pe 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. 1Pe 2:6 Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. 1Pe 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, 1Pe 2:8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed. 1Pe 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: 1Pe 2:10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.
@@SpotterVideo The land promised goes to the Euphrates River. And in Zach there is a temple with a river flowing from it. I suppose you are not premillennial either
@@SpotterVideo You just disproved your self. Matt 21:43. Jesus was rejected by the Jews. We are called the church. Eklaseea. No where are we called Israel.
@@morganfrmn Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. Jas 1:2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; Jas 1:3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.
Wow….ok, so Jesus was a Jewish man and all of the disciples were as well. They were well versed in all Jewish traditions and scripture. At the last supper, Jesus ordained the disciples the priest of the new religion Christianity according to the law God laid out to Moses and Aaron ordaining the priesthood of the Levites in the sins of Aaron. later, he gave Peter the keys to his (Jesus) kingdom, setting Peter at the top of the newly ordained priests (disciples ). Please study the Old Testament and the giving of keys to a trusted person. Jesus didn’t stop there. He said whatever you bind on earth, will be bound in heaven. Whatever you loose on earth, will be loosed in heaven knowing that these men and. Men they ordained after themselves would need to address issues that would come up. These disciples spread out and started churches in an area, ordaining priest and bishops and leaving them in charge of the established church. The disciples, now apostles, would move on to the next area writing letters back to the bishop in the towns they had just left, these would be the churches of Ephesus, Corninth, etc. these letters were a way to keep everything stable in the churches they had established and keep moving establishing new churches. The book of revelation starts out w Jesus telling John that he must tell his 7 churches to get in shape or punishment would come to them. This is the establishment of the Catholic Church. All priest in the Catholic Church can be traced back to the apostles of Jesus. Peter, the man Jesus gave the keys to was the first pope. Here is the lineage of popes from Peter to Sylvester. They existed in Rome, but were constantly martyred, so they were “underground” Peter Linus Anacletus 157-168 Clement Evaristus Alexander I Sixtus I Telesphorus Hyginus Pius I Anicetus Soter Eleutherius Victor I Zephyrinus Callixtus I Urban I Pontian Anterus Fabian Cornelius Lucius I Stephen I Sixtus II Dionysius Felix Eutychian Caius Marcellinus Marcellus Eusebius Miltiades Sylvester 107AD IGNATIOUS of Loyola “wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church” 313 Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire came into union w the existing Catholic Church (under Pope Sylvester) and gave them the protection of Roman Empire and an official geographical location for the headquarters, Rome. He also made Catholicism the official religion of the Roman Empire, calling it the Roman Catholic Church
cute story!! you forgetting our apostle Paul who is our pattern today for the body of christ and the apostle to the gentiles. and he was given several mysteries kept secret since the beginning of the world Pete and James didnt know teach or preach before Paul's conversion in acts 9!! Peter and James were preaching the gospel of the kingdom/ gospel of the circumcision , the catholic lineage is from peter who started the early jew church before the body was revealed to Paul so your following the wrong apostle the wrong message the wrong church and the wrong succession! 1timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting. 2 Tim 1:11 Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles. Paul is the only one with the title apostle to or of the gentiles!! Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: Ephesians 2:11-12 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: Ephesians 3:1-6 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
What about Dr Kim who is preaching dispensationalism and so many listening to him.....Very rare to find a church that preaches that we are saved by grace and not by RACE!!
There may be different forms of what ppl mean by dispensationalism. Are there different Ages? Reading Job where God speaks, I just love it, he walked through the base of the mountains of the deep -- way before Science even knew they were they there! Today I found in Ezekiel a statement about the "fishes" going along "paths". Modern Science is waaaay behind. I've been at this 60 yrs. Key is, Don't let someone else (even an angel from heaven) TELL you what is in the Bible. Because Jesus Christ said John 3:13 No man has ascended into heaven. Peter preached David was not in heaven. Take one subject is the way I did it, so you don't get overwhelmed. But our reward is in heaven, waiting till the Resurrection, when Christ shall stand on the Mount of Olives, where He ascended. The whole thing will split in two, kinda like a meteor strike. Christ will rule from a rebuilt Jerusalem. Also the 12 tribes , 12,000 of each, will have a "gate"? I'd have to look up. The 12 Apostles have special places in a PHYSICAL Temple. Those in the first resurrection will reign with Christ for a 1000 yrs. On Earth. Moreover , Revelation says the Ancient of Days came down. Christ said No one had seen the Fsther's face or heard his voice at any time. How could that be? Just good study subjects. Gen. and Revelations fit like a glove, love reading them. The race thing only comes in with the Israelite Tribes (Not just Judah, which will have to have a Big Change) comes in bc God is STILL trying to fulfill His Promise to Abraham, having had to deal with their rebellion while TRYing to bless them. Musta been irritating, :))) Okay, Day of Trumpets has come on. It's sunset. No Im not Jewish lol!
@@sevenbravo1805 kook /ko͞ok/ a crazy or eccentric person Anyone who blathers on about the pretrib rapture which cannot be found in scripture - yet talks confidently as if it were - is either crazy as a bed bug - or an agent of deception.
I can't believe how you so casually state that "being saved is believing on Jesus Christ, and that alone". How convenient for you; a license to sin. What, did you altogether lose the Book of James? You know, the one that says "Faith without works is dead", like a body without a spirit is too? Did you lose the Gospel where the VERY FIRST words recorded from Jesus' mouth at the beginning of His ministry are; "REPENT, and believe"? Did you lose the part where Jesus tells the woman He spared from being stoned to "Go and sin no more"? No, you didn't, yet you just cling to the verse where it says "Believe, and ye shall be saved". Argh, and you talk about others who have bad teachings. Well, today.. I worry for your salvation, 'O preacher. "Follow peace with all men, and HOLINESS, without which NO MAN shall see the Lord" ~Hebrews
@S.L. So you think you can keep cheating on your wife after marriage and still claim to "love" her? Is that love, having sex with other women? And is she the idiot to believe you? Is Jesus an idiot, because He said "If you love me, keep my commandments." STUMBLING into sin is not the same as walking up to a computer, switching it on, finding a pornography site by typing into a search engine, unzipping your pants, pulling out your penis, masturbating while watching other men and women engage in debauchery, ejaculating, cleaning up after yourself and then putting your penis away. Still don't comprehend? Is this why Jesus said "You MUST be born again"?, so you can indulge in filth over and over because Jesus was brutally tortured, humiliated and murdered for you? Before I give you Scripture, after Scripture, after Scripture, after Scripture, let me ask you; why did Jesus tell us, figuratively or not, to chop off our own hand if it causes us to sin? Why did He tell us to pluck out our eye if it causes us to sin? Why would He say that if sin cannot keep us from Him? Better it is to enter Heaven maimed than enter hell full-bodied, THAT'S what He said. But you need more Scripture do you? You call ME "unbelievable" do you? Wow, unbelievable. So, Scripture? You want Scripture? You mean more than the ones I have already supplied, like "...without HOLINESS, NO ONE shall see the Lord"? But more Scripture, is that what it takes? Of course you NEED to sin, so you will find any excuse to keep doing it and continue to use the Grace of Christ as a floor matt where you can wipe your dirty feet. Ok, buckle up, here comes The Scripture; "For if we sin WILLFULLY after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remain NO MORE sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgement and fiery indignation.." ~Book of Hebrews "Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, IF thou CONTINUE in goodness, OTHERWISE, thou shalt be CUT OFF" ~Book of Romans "Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, AND the ACKNOWLEDGING of the truth which is after GODLINESS." ~Book of Titus "And that He died for all, that they which live SHOULD NOT HENCEFORTH LIVE UNTO THEMSELVES, but unto Him which died for them" ~Book of II Corinthians "According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should BE HOLY and WITHOUT BLAME before Him.." ~Book of Ephesians "Be ye angry, and SIN NOT" ~Book of Ephesians "Whosever transgresseth, and abide not in the DOCTRINE of Christ, HATH NOT GOD." ~Book of II John "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth... seeing that ye have PUT OFF the old man WITH HIS DEEDS, and have PUT ON THE NEW MAN, which is RENEWED in the knowledge after the image of Him.." ~Book of Colossians "For God hath not called us to uncleanness, but UNTO HOLINESS." ~Book of I Thessalonians "Seeing then that all these these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in ALL HOLY BEHAVIOR and GODLINESS...?" ~Book of II Peter "KEEP THYSELF PURE" ~Book of "But with whom was He grieved forty years? Was it not with then THAT HAD SINNED, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?" ~Book of Hebrews "Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall NOT INHERIT the Kingdom of God?" ~Book of I Corinthians "He that saith he abideth in Him ought himself also so to walk EVEN AS HE WALKED." ~Book of I John "For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example , that YE SHOULD FOLLOW HIS STEPS, who DID NO SIN.." ~Book of I Peter "..that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled IN US, who walk NOT AFTER THE FLESH, but after the spirit." ~Book of Romans "For the eyes of the Lord are over THE RIGHTEOUS." ~Book of I Peter "For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the DOERS of the law SHALL BE JUSTIFIED." ~Bool of Romans "But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I MAKE MYSELF A TRANSGRESSOR." ~Book of Galatians "For we must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ: that every one may receive the things DONE in his body, according to that he hath DONE, whether it be good or bad." ~Book of II Corinthians "We then, as workers together with Him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God IN VAIN." ~Book of II Corinthians "For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward; HOW SHALL WE ESCAPE, if we NEGLECT so great salvation?" ~Book of Hebrews "Whosever abideth in Him SINNETH NOT. Whosever sinneth HATH NOT SEEN HIM, NEITHER KNOWN HIM.. Let no man deceive you: he that DOETH RIGHTEOUSNESS is righteous.. He that COMMITTETH SIN is OF THE DEVIL.." ~Book of I John I can go on and on and on and on.. Oh S.L, didn't you know that you MUST be born again? "Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin, because he is born of God." ~Book of I John
Darby family members had lived in the most hunted castle called 'Leap Castle' in 18-21centuries. The early residents O`Carolls could be of giant race. Darby's latter fam meber was also an occult nobelist. The dark spirit ppl were drawn to the Leap Castle. Look at Darby he look very possesed. Even Scofield, he has a different spirit, NOT the Holy Spirit. (btw, my gift is discerning.) >>The O’Carrolls, princes of Ely, whose chief stronghold this castle was, were all big men, in face, a race of giants, as the few relics of them extant attest. >>A little below this is a remarkable room, which none of the servants will enter after nightfall. It was a state bedroom of one of the princess of Ely, who was murdered six centuries ago by her lord, and the solid oak door retains the bloodstains of the royal victim. This part of the building is reputed to be haunted >>A gothic horror writer who often featured the castle in her work, Mrs. Darby was also fascinated by the occult. She conducted multiple séances in the castle’s corridors, and some believe that her communications with the other side is what awoke the Elemental.
You’re not allowed anything soft you’re everything is rough hewn your movement is a throwback to when white dudes were important not like they are now and I’m a white dude it up just let me know
You are explaning for a lot of time what a wolf is. In Darbys time there was a sleeping church that was the remenent of the reformation = Sardis, a death church. Filadelfia is the next coming up = Darby. Sorry brother repant and read your bible again.
yeah the Filadelphia church age was a golden age wasn't it? The 1800s, the so-called philadelphian church age, saw the rise of more false doctrine than any other "age". So the 7 church age doctrine is deeply flawed in its logic. Unless you think Mormonism, Jehovah's witnesses, 7th day adventism and dispensationalism are all true religions that came out of that "church age"
If God gave up on His chosen remnant of Israel He would give up on us Where does this young man think that Darby was a works salvation. The rapture is very soon
Did you really say that men could receive salvation as far back as Genesis 4? Simply by believing in the Lord? It's amazing how far from Scripture you preach. If Salvation was readily available to all prior to the crucifixion of Christ, then the sacrifice Christ made was in vain. You are completely in error and teach heresy.
@@jgvtc559 The souls in Abraham's Bosom were NOT saved prior to Jesus' sacrifice at the cross. Quite simple really. You can't change the order in which the Lord laid everything out in.
@@Vhladd1 this is the dominant teaching in all Covenant Theological seminaries today. If you mention dispensational salvations they will blow a head gasket brother! And then you try to explain what you mean by citing the exact fact that you pointed out, and they try to drive home their position even more! And boy are you ever correct when you made mention of the fact that their theology on salvation makes what He did at Calvary insignificant in their eyes! Of course they will deny that, but it does! God bless you and yours brother! He is coming soon indeed!
@@blake9358 Moses did speak of Jesus, the Messiah, The Christ. However, one is ONLY saved through the blood of the Christ......that blood had not been shed yet in Moses' time. Do your homework. It's simple "cause & effect". Salvation is the result of the penalty paid on the Cross through the shedding of the blood and death of the Christ; until that moment, Salvation was not in effect.
here is a dispensation Old Testament and New Testament your Bible is divided in half what would you called that? Are we to build an ark because of a flood? Do we keep the Law or not? Is there a fruit I must not eat 🤔 please show us master shifu 😂
H God has always had one people. The blessings are in Jesus. He is the True vine. He is the Son who is called out of Egypt (Hosea, read fulfillment in Gospel of Matthew. He is Good Shepherd, John 10. He tells us that He has other sheep of a different fold. He is the true seed. He will out of two make one, Jews and Gentiles, that is the Church. There is more but it is late for me. Look it up. God bless!,
It seems to me that he refuses to go to Greek because “the Bible is it’s own dictionary”…another classic Ruckmanite teaching. Supported by Ruckmanite followers like Gale Riplinger especially. It’s like this group left Ruckmanism after his death, but held on to all of his wacko teachings.
You're out of you're mind.... God's NOT done with Israel. You make God a liar. It's not called "the great tribulation" it's called "Jacobs trouble". Aka Israels trouble
contemplate God's not done with Israel. You need to study. And what version are you quoting "one new man in Christ" from?? Its not the King James I know that. Or your paraphrasing and just adding quotes (which is very dishonest).
Dave Maxwell There's no salvation outside of Christ. So why would that matter. Can you show me a single, clear passage where Jesus, Paul, or any other NT writer states that Jews will be saved nationally on the basis of ethnicity?
Dave Maxwell The one new man is in the king james. Think it says of twain one new man. But that is referring to the body of Christ in this age. God is going back to the Jews. How could folks think God was done with the Jews after reading Romans chapter 11 once? Or reading the prophets. Nothing but boastful pride...and that according to Romans 11 is why God is going back to the Jews when he does. When the fulness of the Gentiles is come.
Thank you very much for this. I am now in a large evangelical church in Minneapolis area. Leadership and most of congregation have drunk the Scofield Kool-aid. I have been trying to debunk Dispensationalism with friends there for some time with almost no success. What you have done here may help me. I grew up as a Lutheran so heard nothing of Dispensationalism. When I started to go to my evangelical church I kept hearing about the Rapture. I bought it for a long time. When Covid and lockdowns hit us I wondered if the tribulation was at hand, I did my own research into Dispensationalism, beginning with Darby, then Scofield and back to the Rothschilds. Didn't take long to realize the whole program was unbiblical and that there was a hidden agenda to the whole program. What you are saying I had found to be accurate. Keep up the good work. My prayers are with you. JM
I was Pentecostal Zionist from head to toes , but no anymore, the more I investigated about darvy, parham, Seymour,scotfield the more God opened my eyes that that dispensationalism isn’t from God.
that is why the word dispensation does appear in the Bible!
"In the last days before the return of Christ, true believers will go through persecution... We will go through suffering and God wants us to be awake and aware and prepared so that we can preach the Gospel." AMEN! We are to be Christ's light, shining in the darkness of the end time of the last days.
We will Not going to go thru the
suffering " and persecution --we will escape the horrible time --- It's called raptured" those of us in Christ Jesus will be raptured before all that tribulation Armageddon start.... God is not going to allow us to go through that would, you allow your children to go through horrible situations and times if you could prevent it. ....... It's going to be the worst time ever is the end time the ending of this world is going to be horrific when we leave this earth we take the light with us, So there will only be darkness on this Earth Read your word-
The first century saints sure went through that!
@@loleki737 Yes, every generation goes through persecution and tribulation. It isn't reserved for the so-called last days, because we have been in the last days since Christ came and bore our sins on the cross.
Any who truly know God won't fear persecution. Jesus said that fear of man is a trap and the bible is clear that there are no cowards in his kingdom. Pretrib rapture heresy is a doctrine of cowardice. Peter chose worse persecution than Christ as he said he wasn't worthy. How much dedication do we have these days like that? Anyone who is a coward does not know Christ. Matthew 7:21-23 proves that many will say Lord Lord but Christ will say he never knew them. Jesus said that no servant is greater than his master. Who are these cowards that think they are better than Christ?
@@christalone71
Exactly, only the final 7 years, and the final three and a half years of the 7 years, is reserved for the End of the Age
Keep doing what you are doing! Thank you for teaching and preaching the truth of the Word!
(Former Dispensationalist and former RC here)
I m back to the King James Version because of Acts 8:37
The Geneva is much better
Good for you!
Luther Bible 1546 for the win
Thomas Jefferson created his own Bible he took out all the parts where he felt like Jesus was being magic
Although this preacher misrepresents what Calvinism is, he is absolutely correct on dispensationalism being error and heresy. I used to be a member of an IFB church that taught dispensationalism and never knew there was anything else. Then I started learning about the reformed faith (doctrines of grace rediscovered during the Protestant Reformation) and the Lord opened my eyes to understand the doctrine of election and predestination through deeper study of the Word of God. It was glorious. Soon afterward He opened my understanding about how wrong dispensationalism is, and I became post-millennial and that was also glorious. Praise His holy name for His faithfulness to not leave me in darkness and error!
Amen 🙏🕊️
The standard calvinist answer " you misrepresent" so as yo invalidate ALL criticism. Calvinism is a different gospel and so is dispensationalism/rapture etc.
@@Dilley_G45 You are full of hate and bitterness. I pray the Lord saves you and heals your brokenness.
@@Dilley_G45 You are full of hate and bitterness. I pray the Lord saves you and heals your brokenness.
@@Dilley_G45 You are full of h.a.t.e and bitterness. I pray the Lord saves you and heals your brokenness.
Very well said. I enjoyed listening to this message more than anything that I've heard in a while.
Funny,
Pastor says, “you can have bad doctrines and still be saved”…yet goes on to judge the salvation of everyone who has a doctrine he disagrees with , classic! He calls out Ruckmanites as being heretical and unsaved, yet refuses to look at any Greek words, a classic Ruckmanite teaching!
Yes this guy has no idea and I wonder if he himself is even saved
Well, he doesn't cite a lot of scripture to back his claims. Apparently he is very sold on replacement theology. Myself, the Bible seems to show very clearly that God is not yet finished with the people of Israel. He is very quick to judge others. Also there is a distinct difference between demons (unclean spirits) and fallen angels.
If the people he is denouncing had some problems, that doesn't necessarily mean that they didn't have some things figured out. All of the teachers and preachers I know that are teaching Dispensational Hermeneutics and pre-tribulation eschatology are using the Bible, and usually the KJV to back up their position. He also seems to have something against the KJV, which is the only English language translation that is trustworthy in my opinion. But perhaps he just doesn't like the Schofield etc editions.
If salvation is only by the (correct) Gospel as Paul taught, then apparently nobody prior to the New Testament was saved?
We all need to be discerning. He is entirely correct that the Masons are a very dangerous organization, and they promote very bad doctrines.
🙏✝️👑✝️🙏
Great message. There is way too much confusion in Christianity today.
And I just heard some of it.
You not only know history and geopolitics really well you equally know the Bible and its truth.
For anyone interested. Walter Veith Total Onslaught series. Dispensationalism is a very real and sad state of mind today.
Great preaching pastor. And I like your water glass. It is exactly like the ones I have at my house!
Yea, it is the water glass that is the gospel
Yep.. a Mason jar.. sure to keep the liquid Square and Level. 🙄
This is right on. 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 says that Satan's servants masquerade as apostles of Christ. The 4th commandment has never changed and Hebrews 4:1-13 proves it. There is no Sunday mandate in the bible. Sunday is a pagan worship day. James 2:10 says that to stumble at any point of the law is the same as breaking it all. You have to be in all truth or else you settle for some lie.
They moved from the sabbath day on Saturday and changed it to worship of the solar Sun disc on the day “Sun”day.
That was due to rejecting the Moon Hebrew calendar and jumping to the sun god Gregorian calendar.
There is a dichotomy here. I agree with the idea that dispensationalism is dangerous and wrong theology. I agree that the most dangerous part of dispensationalism is that it states that much of what Jesus said is not for Christians. All of it is for Christians. However, I do not see that this pastor has fully realized what the implications of that are. If every part of the Bible is for us than you cannot escape the Sermon on the Mount. That sermon is directed at us. If we are saved by grace alone, than we can ignore the Sermon on the Mount in our lives both public and private lives anyway we want, we could even be gay or drink or be addicted to drugs or commit crimes and it cannot effect our salvation. If however, there are sins that cannot be accepted in the church, then no sin can be accepted in the church, including failure to feed the hungry, help the poor, or visit the incarcerated. There is a very strong dichotomy today in the church and this guy is onto it but there is a ways to go.
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word.
Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.
What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below.
New Covenant Whole Gospel:
Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him.
He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth.
Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:
Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD:
Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
Watch the RUclips videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.
That is what Jesus said that we are to love our neighbors as ourself and that doesn't mean you're next door neighbor that means go and read about the Samaritan where the priest and the levite passed a man laying on the side of the road had been beaten almost to death and robbed and left to die but the Samaritan bandaged his wounds and took him to an end and told the innkeeper give him whatever he needs and when I return I will pay you because he was the Good Samaritan that is how we are supposed to look at those that are in trouble that are lost that are in need of a glass of water a coat a place to lay their not to pass them by and leave them laying on the street.
*_God Bless Pastor_*
So many teach Dispensationalism far to readily without serious scrutiny of its sources.
The globalists at the "World Economic Forum" have said by 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be "happy". Meanwhile many in the modern Church claim we do not need to be concerned about global government. The truth is found below.
What does an understanding of the New Covenant do to the Pretrib Rapture doctrine?
Since the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20, how is the New Covenant Church age going to end seven years before the Second Coming of Christ? Why would anyone think God is going back to the Old Covenant system now made “obsolete” by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13? We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
The Capitol "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found. In Revelation 12:11 we find those under the blood of the Lamb. A person cannot be under the blood of the Lamb and not be a part of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ. Verse 12 of this passage proves at least part of the tribulation period is the wrath of Satan upon the people of God.
Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
"It may come as a surprise to most pre-Trib prophecy students that the post-Trib position (in its primitive form) is the oldest point of view."
(The quotation above is from the book "Will You Escape The Tribulation? RAPTURE [Under Attack]", by Tim LaHaye, copyright 1998, Page 197.) Tim LaHaye was co-author of the “Left Behind” books and movies which have convinced millions of modern Christians that the Church age ends seven years before the Second Coming of Christ. Recently, Pastor Matt Furse of Mountain View Baptist Church in Custer, S.D. has written a book titled “Which One Is Right?’, which reveals the recent history of the pretrib rapture doctrine, and the fact it does not agree with what is written in the King James Bible.
The gathering of the Church is described at the end of 1 Thess. Chapter 4, and the timing of the event is found in chapter 5. The word “But” in the first verse of chapter 5 connects the two chapters, and the words “we” and “sleep” in verse 10 of chapter 5 prove the two chapters are connected.
The Greek words for “wrath” and “tribulation” are not the same word, as proven by the verse below.
Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Watch the RUclips video “Pretribulation Paradox” by former pretrib believer skydiver626.
Darby, Scofield and Larkin didn't go fore enough. The "gospel of Grace" in opposite to the "gospel of the Kingdom" is one of the aspects of "Rightly dividing the Word or Truth". Otherwise you have to explain a lot of contradiction in the Word of God. God bless.
correct in your assessment.
Amen
2 gospels
@@ScripturesAndScienceGoing to hell
@@ScripturesAndScienceThere is only 1 gospel
@@ScripturesAndScience
*One gospel
Acts 19:10 KJV
[10] And this continued by the space of two years; so that all they which dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks.
Mark 1;4 Turn away from your sins and be baptized and God will forgive your sins
Excellent! Packed with truths! Much thanks⚓️
Packed with BS.😊
@@timothy4557Given it is BS, you sat through his entire talk because you thought it was BS. Hasbra troll much?
@@katiecat5500 Not much.
Amen Bro. Fannin. I think the wolf pack has done more damage than any other group to IFB churches.
That baby in the back didn’t let up lol..
The issue of bible versions was not that prevalent back then. Not so many versions. Wasn't as much of an issue. So there was not the material proof we have now. Larkin was great. Yes he did go to the R.V sometimes. But God used him greatly to provide light on end times prophecy. Way ahead of his time. Got most of it right in my opinion.
You are fooled
The most ironic claim by those who study history only long enough to satisfy their viewpoint.
Darby never started dispensationism, as we know its mentioned four times in Paul's epistles - the Biblical proof.
The historical proof -
1828 Websters dictionary in which Noah Webster( A christian) began compiling in 1807 -
#4. dictionary explanation for dispensation -
That which is dispensed or bestowed. A system of principles and rites enjoined. As the Mosaic dispensation; the gospel dispensation; including the former the Levitical Law and rites, the latter the scheme of the redemption of Christ.
How much clearer and precise does history have to be?
@@LawofLiberty
I can quote Paul's epistles over and over that clearly state "works" will not provide salvation, but why bother. Until you spend as much time studying the epistles of Paul as you probably have elsewhere you shall never comprehend the gospel of grace. All the Bible is to us, for doctrine, reproof, correction and righteousness but only the epistles of Paul are for us...in the dispensation we now reside.
My question is can you count? How many gospel's are listed in this passage?
Galatians 2:7
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
If I was a wagering man(which I am not)would bet you will twist this passage to suit your position, instead of taking it literally, just like
2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD OF TRUTH
Dispensational believers take the Bible in a more literal manner.
That being said, if your chosen path for salvation comes through works and not in faith alone in Christ blood for salvation, you will have an opportunity for remission of your sins if you make it through the tribulation period, via temple sacrifices during the millennial kingdom, having a earthly first estate.
Personally I prefer a heavenly first estate with a body of light.
@@ScripturesAndScience You might as well be a Jehovah's Witness with that heretical B.S.
You seek to denigrate the Salvation of Christ's sacrifice with future animal sacrifices, yet talk about rightly dividing the word of truth.
I pray that you escape that delusion asap.
@@thenowchurch6419 the very fact that you use the short term for the curse word is indicative of the placement of your carnal heart
@@kenforesight9875 I would have thought the more important point was that i refuted Scripture and Science's claim that people will be saved in the future through animal sacrifices, which makes Christ's sacrifice nought.
I wonder about the placement of your heart.
You agree with him ?
Darby family members had lived in the most hunted castle called 'Leap Castle' in 18-21centuries. The early residents O`Carolls could be of giant race. Darby's
latter fam meber was also an occult nobelist. A pile of bones found under a dungeon. The history of this castle is demonic.
The dark spirit ppl were drawn to the Leap Castle. Look at Darby he look very possesed. Even Scofield, he has a different spirit, NOT the Holy Spirit. (btw, my gift is discerning.)
>>The O’Carrolls, princes of Ely, whose chief stronghold this castle was, were all big men, in face, a race of giants, as the few relics of them extant attest.
>>A little below this is a remarkable room, which none of the servants will enter after nightfall. It was a state bedroom of one of the princess of Ely, who was murdered six centuries ago by her lord, and the solid oak door retains the bloodstains of the royal victim. This part of the building is reputed to be haunted
>>A gothic horror writer who often featured the castle in her work, Mrs. Darby was also fascinated by the occult. She conducted multiple séances in the castle’s corridors, and some believe that her communications with the other side is what awoke the Elemental.
Praise God preach it brother
Without the teaching of Darby? Without the theaching of Scofield? Without the teachings of Larkin? BUT ONLY WITH YOUR TEACHINGS? The church was not known in OT Eph 3:2-13. It started on pentecostal. There was a time of innocense Adam and Eve they needed not to be saved by grace before they had sin. So how the church existed from creation? Please rightly divide The Word.
eugenius kubiczek the church DID exist in the old testament. Church simply means assembly, or CONGREGATION, as the OT puts it. You've been deceived by wolves.
In the KJV Jesus said :"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."= Future tens
this is not christianity sorry
eugenius kubiczek
Amen brother. Dispensationalism is the only way to read the bible. Once it's fully understood these clowns are soooo easy to spot... but extremely vexing to listen to.
Pastor Brett so you’re saying people are saved by the law?
Galatians 5
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth?
This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.
A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.
I have confidence in you through the Lord, that ye will be none otherwise minded: but he that troubleth you shall bear his judgment, whosoever he be.
And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased.
I would they were even cut off which trouble you.
For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.
This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Galatians 3
Oh foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.
He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.
And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.
So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.
For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
Galatians 1:6
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED.
As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, LET HIM BE ACCURSED.
The first part of your paragraph proves dispensation, a division of the scripture from Old Testament and New. Just like we dont stone people to death for adultery in the New Testament. I like the dispensation teacher I listen to. He does not teach anything this pastor is talking about that is bad and does study and think for himself. but this is good teaching also. Dr. Gene Kim. Bible teacher of dispensation. The Bible is Awesome.
@@BeckyCathell My Quotation from Scripture has NOTHING to do with Dispensation but with the UNIQUE and ONLY Gospel of Salvation given by Jesus Himself to Paul:
Salvation is BY FAITH ONLY in the COMPLETED and SUFFICIENT WORK that Jesus performed in The Cross, and NOT BY WORKS.
It is FAITH plus NOTHING. The second anyone ADDS ANYTHING to the Gospel DEFILES IT, and hence is subject to Galatians 1:8: BE ACCURSED, BE DAMNED, BY GOD, not by anyone else. BY GOD.
Dispensation? IS THE LGIC CONCLUSION IF A BELIEVER READS THE SCRIPTURE PROPERLY. Whatever else is FOOLISHNESS. I know a lot of uneducated, scholarly DISINFORMED, SCRIPTURALLY ILLITERATE, like the one in this video, who calls us BORN AGAIN, SAVED BELIEVERS, INDWELLED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, REPROBATES. THEY WILL HAVE TO FACE JESUS and THE PUNISHMENT THEREIN.
Temple of Solomon was built by Demons
How do you know this? Bible says Solomon paid King of Tyre and his helpers build it. They was worshippers of Baal. but does not mean they are demons. maybe had demons. God told Solomon to build the Temple. I would like to know the Biblical interpretations of the Temple. I know the Kabbalah one and it is false. God told King David how to build the Temple. measurements and such. King of Tyre did not worship the Lord, but he was freinds with King David also. I would like to know when / and why the glory of God left the Ark of the Covenant? Was it about the time Solomon started with his Idols?? anyone?
Many generations have wondered if it's thend of the world or living in the last days.
Right now, things are precarious here in America and on fire in other parts of the world.
The last days spoken of by Christ and His apostles, however, were speaking of the end of the OT age or eon.
The sacrificial system was drawing to a close. Jerusalem, the temple and it's priesthood were utterly destroyed during THEIR tribulation. It wrapped up in AD 70.
Secular history confirms these events.
More importantly, Christ and His apostles speak to the first generation timeline over 100 times in the NT.
As the end of the OT days, the NT or age of grace was ushered in.
The Kingdom of God (heaven) has been a reality for some two thousand years now. It's spiritual and everlasting. The world is without end.
Grace and peace to you.
good job!
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
@@SpotterVideo So glad to see you show up here brother! I see your comments on a good many videos and your thorough explanations are very helpful! God bless!
@@christalone71 Thank you for the encouragement. It is very rare these days.
I will stick with Dave Hunt and The Berean Call truth
Google says that the official start of modern Zionism was 1897, too late for Darby.
19:16 - what is authority in this church? Bible? Or rather your understanding of Bible?
the Dispensation of GOD
Are you saying that we don't have to turn from our sins in order to be saved ? If so what of Hebrews 10:26 ?
The book of Hebrews Hebrews was written to people that are already saved on how they should live, not teaching you can be saved better good works, and not teaching you cal lose everlasting life.
Hebrews 10: 26 KJV
For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
Jesus died once for all sins, he is trying to teach the Hebrews that they don't need to make a yearly sacrifice for sin there was a payment made once and for all.
What sin did the thief on the cross repent of
Who baptized him
People believe traditions and error instead on plain scripture proving itself
Whoah, hold your horses there 😲
Wish I would have known this years ago, but God brings us through things for a reason. What is your church website? I dont have one here. So much deception. :( Few if any want to listen to the warnings. No discernment.
LawofLibertybaptist.com
Was everything these men taught correct? No.
I thought the verse "ye might bear with him" means that they might get deceived by the false doctrine. Bearing with someone is when you listen to them and tolerate them. "be patient or tolerant with." according to Google. I hadn't heard that bearing with him meant we would contend with them.
Yes, we will share in the cross of Christ.
Don't forget Ruckman!
There is no HELL, that's a false translation, among hundreds in the KJV, the correct translation is the word grave. Darby started the fallacy of a rapture, you have it correct regarding the nonsense of dispensation. It is false teaching to say after death one goes to Heaven or Hell, we wait in the grave for the resurrection of the righteous before the millennium and the wicked are judged after the millennium Rev 20
Is this Steve Anderson's brother? (faithful word Baptist church)
I thought it was him at first glance 😂
Demons are the nephillim, the fallen angels are bound but in Enoch it says will be loosed after a time
And it says demons are the children of the fallen angels
"And it says"
Where does it say that?
Nephilim is merely Hebrew for "heroes", "giants", impressive persons, even bullies, ...
Just look some good dictionary up.
Using alien words doesn't make a concept smarter.
And Genesis merely says that sons of men (born of the flesh, unbelievers) had daughters.
And it says there were also "sons of God". Like children of God.
If you are a believer you are a "child of God".
So, basically believers started to marry daughters of unbelievers.
And their offspring became terrible bullies.
Filled with the bad morals and ideas of the unbelieving grandfathers, but mixed with some outward aspects of the believers.
And out of that they became warriors, bullying others, founding mighty cities and early armies.
Nephilim = giants, bullies, early fascist leaders.
And please don't spread any cabalist book of enough ideas!
The book of enough is an occultist source, square to anything you can find in the Bible, although it's using some biblical names and terminologies in between its cabalist doctrine.
@@chrise842 Deuteronomy 2:10-11 KJV:
"10) The Enims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and TALL, as the Anakims, 11) Which were also accounted giants, as the Anakims, but the Moabites call them Emims.
Deuteronomy 2:20-21 KJV:
"20) That also was accounted a land of giants: giants dwelt there in old time; and the Ammonites call them Zamzummims; 21) A people great, and many, and TALL, as the Anakims; but the LORD destroyed them; and they succeeded them, and dwelt in their stead"
And let's not forget Goliath, unless of course you think he was just your average sized soldier?? Not to be sarcastic, but how much of His Word do you actually believe is literal? Do you believe in a flood that covered the whole earth? Or the literal physical bodily resurrection of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ!
If we start doubting what the text says, we are led to all sorts of ideas that are formulated by men. Dispensationalists don't do that. This entire video is a smear campaign against true bible believing men, who were not perfect, but were also not evil.
Sorry if these are old questions. My mom believes in this Jewish chosenness and Jews returning to the Jewish State central to the Coming of Jesus. Here in America, I understand this all comes from the Scofield Study Bible. I have several questions: Has the Scofield doctrine infiltrated into her King James Bible? Or is it just how her KJB scripture is interpreted? Or are there different versions of the KJB and how would you identity the correct version to get the true Word of God? I believe this is such an important issue in these days. Thank You.
Genesis 1:1
“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”
Note the word HEAVEN (singular) found in the KJV, most other false bibles, replace the word heaven by heavens (plural), God allowed for this waterproof mark to happen on the very first verse of His Holy Word for a reason.....
Galatians 3 : 16.
Scofield used a given Bible translation and added commentary below it. Maybe he made some changes to the translation, too.
And I guess he inserted countless headlines between the paragraphs of the Bible chapters.
@@chrise842 You do realize that nearly all of the dispensational preaching that was done for a very very long time, was done by preachers who viewed the King James Bible as the ultimate authority right?
The greatest defender of the King James Bible was a Bible believing dispensationalist and he never once proclaimed that Scofield or Larkin were 100% accurate in every detail. Nor did he claim himself to be. But this guy and every one of his kind hate the man and literally claim that he is burning in hell! This great man was named Peter S. Ruckman!
The NIFB is wrong on so many levels, and just because they are KJVO does not make them right.
She probably believes that because she read the Bible (KJV), Gen 12,15,17,26,28, God's covenant with Israel for the land, God never breaks a covenant (man can) , so Israel will someday have there promised land. Probably not until after the 7 years of Jacob's trouble yet to come.
Bill Wilson,. How can you deny God's plan for the remnant of Israel?
If God gave up on His remnant of Israel He would have to give up on believers today. We are no better
That verse you read in 1 Peter is Jewish, in the old testament God wanted Israel to be a kingdom of priests, and the other language used such as the sprinkling of blood, all Jewish. Paul never refers to the body of Christ as a holy nation or any such thing.
YOU ARE WRONG:
1 Peter 1: 1 KJV
Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the *strangers* scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
"Rosicrucian" means actually the "rose on the Cross" - by which is Rose =Life -- i.e. the Negation of Death viz. Death is the Negation of Life, thus that when Jesus died on the Crucifix Jesus became the Christ -- Negation of Negation = Affirmation of Life: the Christ taking upon Himself the Sin of humanity (sacrificial Lamb/ scapegoat) : the negation of sin and death viz. Christ Conquest of death resulting in sinless Eternal Life, without Sin
Bla blah!
The cross of the rose was Luthers personal coat of arms he designed for himself.
It had five parts like a rose flower, signifying certain aspects of his theology.
A golden ring around it and mainly Christ's cross that brought salvation in the center of it.
Forget your rose is life rubbish.
What Luther just had as a fun emblem to try to teach also here in symbols what he preached daily in countless letters, sermons, university lectures, bible commentaries, children's catechism etc. was turned into some stupid cabalist mystic secrets by some corrupted and too well connected officials many years after him.
Luther hated hidden secrets and made the biblical Gospel accessible to the children of the simplest peasants and to house maidens and simple work crew.
Your cabalist friends mimicked his lingo and turned it into something of old satanic Egyptian mysteries into which only some corrupt rich fucks can be secretly initiated.
You are enemies of the plain and simple Gospel of Christs forgiveness, out of Rosicrucianism came the darkest and murderous illuminati covens into which today's antichristian elites are heavily tied.
Stop fooling us!
Ok, so Anglican theology is from English Protestantism of RCC.
When you begin your sermon by misappropriating scripture, that is where you lose me. The warning in Revelation is referring to the book of Revelation, not the whole Bible. As for your attack on a believer that has been dead for almost 100 years and cannot defend himself, I see this as a means of attempting to lift yourself on a pedestal. C.I. Scofield was not guilty of changing the Bible. He added notes and a study system to a KJV Bible. If you disagree with some of his notes or teachings, then chew the meat and spit out the bones. Don't slander the man's name and call him a false prophet. Please show me in the Scofield Study Bible where a prophecy was written that did not come to pass. You can't, because he never claimed to be a prophet.
If it is a question about some of his teachings, then ignore it. Don't drag the man's name through the mud while using it as a pedestal to exalt yourself. That is hypocrisy. The Scofield Study Bible has been an instrument of God for almost 100 years. Listening to you and others only drives me closer to the Bible that I have used for decades. Thank you for your encouraging sermon.
Spurgeon warned everyone to stay clear of them and their heresies. Are you saying Spurgeon is a liar? We are called to expose deception whether the person is alive or dead. If you have been preaching from this bible then you, Pastor Brett are also teaching heresies. I would suggest you look into history and learn the truth and repent before you are judged for leading God's sheep to hell with false doctrine.
please go here and hear who Scofield really was.
Pastor Brett
Hmmm A so called pastor that has confidence in a man that was unfit to stand behind a pulpit... Did you know that he wrote his erronous book rightly dividing the word of truth just before abandoning his wife and children... Did you know that he was a member of the lotus club (A group of unbelieving Jewish lawyers) Antichrists!
Dispensation is stewardship... You keep on belching up poison and misleading people in your evidently biblically illiterate congregation... You will pay a big price... Read your bible and throw away the commentary... Especially the Schofield footnotes... He didn't even believe the KJV was a superior version... He wanted to use the Revised version... Look for yourself how he clearly attacks scripture in his footnotes and says this or that verse was omitted in the older better manuscripts...
He relied upon the Alexandrian cult text Vaticanus /Sinaiticus...
The new IFB because they reject charismatic gifts for today (I think) reinterpret prophesy/prophet to preaching /preacher. That is why they can say those they disagree with are false prophets and reprobates.
Also because of the doctrine of preservation they see The KJV with out outside input as the standard. So to say the passage in Revelation is only for Revelation viewed as you changing the text.
I am confused but didn't Jesus say "Repent and believe" in His first sermon along with counting the cost of following Him before following Him. And Peter's first sermon on Pentecost he told them to repent. Repentance doesn't save as you still need a blood sacrifice and Christ did that but it is commanded in the Bible- not a good suggestion- commanded.
And what about the 7 churches of Asia Minor that Jesus warned severely if they didn't repent? That was back in that time AFTER His resurrection, not some future dispensation as some dispensationalsts teach. One of the churches He said He would blot out their name out of the Book of Life if they didn't get right. He never said they weren't Christians. I have never heard a good sermon explaining any of these passages and I am only naming a few of many passages that I can name. Even the parable of the seed and the sower says "..they believed for a while.." which means they didn't continue in the faith.
Also, aren't Darby, Scofield and Larkin saved according to the once-saved always saved doctrine?
Sacred Cowtipper none of those passages make any sense without dispensations. Rightly dividing does mean something. The Jews could lose salvation in the old testament. David said after sinning a couple great sins like murder and adultery: Lord take not thine Holy Spirit from me. The Spirit did depart from King Saul so he wound up going to see a witch.
Today in the church age made up of primarily gentiles we are sealed by the Holy Spirit. When we get saved we become new creatures in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17). Our new man does not sin. I have never sinned since I got saved though my flesh does sometimes. See Romans chapter 7. That is why Paul said he kept his body (his flesh) in subjection. Once saved always saved is true for this church age dispensation. But folks in the old testament and during tribulation can lose their salvation. That explains falling away and being once enlightened (Hebrews).
Also explains Revelation passages. Any more questions feel free.
Sacred Cowtipper, You easily tipped over the eternal security cow. They must have very itchy ears to want to listen to such a blatant lie. The Baptist with their eternal security doctrine of devils have done more damage than all the other wolves put together.
You repent by acknowledging the law condemning you, as a reply to that you believe in the Gospel of Christ taking your condemnation vicariously upon himself at the cross and giving you life and forgiveness when rising from the dead again.
There you have your repent and believe.
Once saved always saved is wrong.
But Darby was never a believer probably. A lawyer!
@@chrise842 i never heard darby being a lawyer. He was an anglican i believe.
Does God deals with us differently? If not what does Hebrews 1:1,2 means?
Hebrews 1:1,2
Heb 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
KJV
Read Galatians 3 : 16 to find out WHO is The person (singular) who the ultimate recipient of The promises of God were promised to, once you understand that, The whole Old Testament will become a supporting document to the New Testament and to The Real Salvation Plan found ALONE in Jesus Christ to ALL of humanity...
@@condorcondorito2303 there’s only one salvation plan for us TODAY grace trough faith on the gospel 1 Corinthians 15:1,4
@@pablovaldez5550
We are both in accord brother, THAT IS the only true Gospel of Salvation found in Jesus The Christ ALONE, Galatians
3 : 16 more than ratifies that the promises were given to Abraham and to HIS SEED as of ONE and NOT as of many, and Jesus being THAT SEED, and because of BELIEF, ALL that make Jesus their savior for their souls are ALSO inheritants of the the promises of God through Christ Jesus, no matter our background, nationality or race, but, as The Bible teaches, there will be a falling away from the faith (if you ask me, I believe it has already started for some time) in the later times, let us remind the brethren of THE SIMPLICITY of The Gospel of Salvation found ALONE in JESUS CHRIST. ALL The Glory be to GOD in the highest.
Saludos y Bendiciones...
@@condorcondorito2303 amen brother 🙏🏻
@@pablovaldez5550
Wow!!!, I visited your channel, and saw your video about "idol worship" also read, most of the comments on that video, I did learn a lot about you, have any of the ideas you posted on those messages have changed in the past 2 years? By reading the comments of those two persons you were communicating with, I have arrived to the conclusion that they were both judaizers or self professed jews (although, you asked straight up, and they denied it), whenever, anybody starts using the name of yashua or yeshua (to refer to JESUS), then it raises a red flag with me big time, also, one of them would NOT accept The Biblical Trinity, nor confirm That Jesus IS GOD (another judaizing false gospel trait), it more than confirms that ANOTHER gospel is being introduced among the christian churches that is leading most congregants to depart from the True Faith, with that being said, I was pleasently surprised to learn from your comments in your own video that you rely on the 1602 spanish version, now, for close to 5 years, I have discarded my old reina valera 1960 edition and relied solely in the Valera 1602 Purificada, when it comes to the spanish language Bible, I have also contacted the Church in Mexico and spoken to The Pastor of this incredible endeavour on bringing back The 1602 Purificada back to light, The Lord used me as well, to bring this Bible version to my local christian book store, where ever since then, it has been a best seller among the brethren in my community (I did NOT profit financially from this Godly task), it is wild to understand, that the Valera 1602 Purificada, PRECEEDES 9 full years the KJV Bible that came out in 1611, but, since we are in an english speaking country, the importance of the Valera Purificada 1602 has NOT received much attention, it is amazing to compare both Bibles (the 1602 and The KJV 1611) and how miraculously they support each other in their content!!!!. I have also read your comments about your family being catholic and how they reject The True Gospel of Salvation found in Jesus ALONE, I can also relate wholeheartedly, but understand this, no one is a prophet in his own land, even Jesus' message, was NOT received among his own hometown, therefore, I will pray for The Lord to send a Bible Believing messenger to your family members, so they can hear The Gospel of Salvation through Jesus, from the lips of Another person, also below, pls. Find a writting that I have used in the past to offer to roman catholics. I pray that our communication does NOT end and that we can continue sharing Biblical knowledge among each other.
QUESTIONS TO ASK CATHOLICS
-Who came into the world to save sinners, Jesus or Mary?
-Who is the sinner's best friend?
-When Mary and Jesus were on earth, did Jesus invite sinners to come unto himself or to Mary for their salvation?
-Does the Bible show anywhere a sinner afraid to go to Jesus, and in turn asks Mary to approach Jesus to help him out?
-The thief on the cross next to Jesus, did he do well to talk to Jesus or to Mary standing at his feet?
-If Jesus loved sinners more than Mary did when He was on the earth and since Jesus is up in Heaven now, has He lost any of that superior, divine love and mercy that he had for lost sinners?
-Then, if Jesus is my best friend, why shouldn"t I go directly to Him instead of Mary?
-Why should anyone go to someone who is inferior in power, love and mercy for my salvation?
-And if your RCC teaches you that mary is the mother of God and all wise, then, why don't you obey her and " do everything that He (Jesus) tells you to do" like she instructed people to do while she was alive?
-Jesus never revered mary nor called her "mother", but instead chose to call her woman.
Then, after ministering to them, pray to God to open their eyes and free their souls from the lies of the roman catholic institution, As true Christians, we know that the truth is found in the pages of his unchanging and ALL powerful Word The KJV Bible, all these poor people have to do is loose their lives and souls for eternity in hell and in the lake of fire, they need to stop placing their trust in man made dogma or in fairy tales created to subjugate and enslave them, share with them the knowledge that the final authority in everything Holy is The Bible, salvation is found within it's pages.
1 Timothy 2 : 5, 6
5 For there is one God, and ONE mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Acts 4 : 10, 11, 12.
10 Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12 Neither is there salvation IN ANY OTHER: for there is NONE OTHER NAME under heaven given among men, whereby WE MUST BE SAVED.
I wish you would come plant a NIFB church here in Des Moines Iowa. I'd come in a heartbeat!
Just want everyone who doesnt realize it to know.
Hebrews is written to Hebrews/ Jews. Not Christians. There are many flase teachers out there. I just watched one. Please use the holy spirit to discern. Dispensations are in the bible regardless of what any man says. Read it through and study 2 tim 2:15 and rightly divide the word of truth.
This "gospel of grace", "gospel of the kingdom", "the kingdom of God", "the kingdom of Christ" is nothing more than divisive gibberish. John 10:16 "And other sheep (the Gentiles) I have, which are not of this fold: (the Jews), them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold (of both Jews and Gentiles) and one shepherd (Jesus Christ).
Eph 2:14 "For he is our peace, who hath made both (Jews and Gentiles) one (one body), and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us (Jews and Gentiles);"
Eph 4:4-6, "There is one body(of Jews and Gentiles), and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;
One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all." Gal 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Greek (Gentile) there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are ALL ONE in Christ Jesus." Rom 16:17 "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause DIVISIONS and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and AVOID them."
You cannot refute the doctrine so you attack the men's character.
The physical Jews are not gods chosen people, Christians are. (Matthew 21:42-43) (1 Peter 2:7-9) If anyone is in Christ, then he is counted for the seed of Abraham and the promises are then made to him as well. (Galatians 3:28-29) (Galatians 3:16) A Jew is one who is in Christ, not of the physical circumcision. (Romans 2:28-29) The rapture happens after the tribulation. (Matthew 24:29-31) (1 Corinthians 15:52) there is only one gospel, not multiple. Peter, Paul, and Jesus all preached the same gospel. (Galatians 1:8-9)The kingdom of heaven and kingdom of God are literally the same thing and used interchangeably. (Matthew 19:23-24) Jews were never saved by the law. (Galatians 3:21-22) (Romans 10:30-33) In fact, Paul is quoting Habakkuk 2:4 in Galatians 3:11. Also Galatians 3:8-9. The irony is that these people parrot 2 Timothy 2:15 like a mantra yet don’t even divide the truth rightly themselves. There is so much about dispensationalism that any Christian couldn’t agree with. Studying the scriptures, one would never conclude dispensationalism.
Is that enough for you? It's not hard debunking dispensationalism. These men were of dubious character and despised the KJV.
One little error to correct sir.
The Rosicrucian movement was not from or in the Roman Catholic Church.
It was closely associated with Lutherans and Church of England.
Read the Rosicrucian Manifestos ; they condemn the Pope and seek a reformation of all things.
They weren't true confessional Lutherans, just focusing on the traditional symbolism and some perverted terminology of it.
Confessional Lutheranism is THE Sola scriptura, Sola fide movement per se. True confessional Lutherans abhor the teachings of Rosicrucianism.
Back then among Protestant princes masonic ideas were made popular to allegedly fight against the romish counterpart. Indeed they were lured into that.
And it were mighty officials in the slowly corrupted, still state aligned Lutheran regions coming up with such ideas.
Confessional Lutheranism has almost completely left those structures by now, was heavily persecuted by them and led to new Sola scriptura based churches, mainly in the US.
"reformation of all things" is subversive language to convince Protestants that this mystic occultism would be biblical.
They were kind of early illuminati and it's not very different from today's Tikun Olam teachings.
Actually they share their inspirational sources: cabalism.
@@chrise842 You are wrong in assuming that Qabala is subversive of the Gospel.
You should realize that the verses and prophecies used by the writers of the Gospels to show Jesus as the Messiah were all based on Qabalistic
methodology.
They cannot be used in their original context but had to be taken out of context and interpreted mystically.
Without mysticism, the idea that the crucifixion and resurrection of the Messiah, saves a person when they apply faith, makes no sense.
@@thenowchurch6419 rest assured you will burn in hell eternally, ny sweet wordsmith, rhetor and sophist!
How many people reject the graciousness of God!
The bible says that we are sealed unto the day of redemption and that if any man take the mark of the beast he will go to hell guaranteed??
How can you reconcile these two scriptures without a change in dispensation??, unless saved people can take the mark of the beast and loose the seal of God thus loosing the salvation that isn't by works??
If your title represents your true position
You just trashed the Philadelphia Church
Then, you exalted the Laodecian church which the LORD says he will spew out of His mouth into the tribulation
Do you think today's church is "right"?
Your position is entirely untenable.
Thus video is not correct neither..Darby was Anglican not Catholic and Catholic do not mention the rapture neither that the Pope is millennium on earth.
The angel s made the decision to fallow Satan before they left heaven from God from rebellion toward God and only sin to keep u from heaven is not believing acts 16 31
There's a lot of truth to this but there's a lot of your own perception of what Jesus is saying and meaning... And it's a little confusing and confusion is not true, So we can all have our different opinions about the word of God so we should all pray for the truth to be revealed and know the truth instead of listening to one person idea of it but a lot of this is not right....
So if this preacher doesn't believe in dispensations I guess he is still under the law! The Old and New Testament proves there are at least two dispensations!
Salvation has always been by faith, Old and New Testament
Acts 10: 43 KJV
To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
@@LawofLiberty... Still under the Law because the whole Bible applies to him for there are no dispensation in his theology
@@LawofLiberty Salvation wasnt possible until the blood was shed , there's no one in the old testament saved by the blood of the lamb , remission of sin is not the same as salvation its one component of it ,
Apostle Paul was a persecutor of Christians, after seeing the glory of Jesus, he became a Christian and an Apostle of Christ. But his roots were in Judaism, therefore he include some Judaism in his writings.
Heresy
But later, he compared ALL of his "judaism" to DUNG, The Bible, clearly shows that Paul underwent an "evolution" in faith through time, first, although he was called by God to take The Gospel to the gentiles, Paul was hoping that by doing so, he will bring jelousy to his "own people" (the jews), hoping, that they would receive The Gospel of Salvation of The Lord Jesus Christ, also, The Bible gives details of how Paul erroneusly circumcised Thimoteus (by the pressure of the judaizers), so young Timotheus could enter into jerusalem, but later, Paul himself declared that circumcision does NOT benefit those redeemed by The Blood of Christ and should NOT be circumcised at ALL, also, after Paul was persecuted, jailed and stoned numerous times by the jews, he finally gave up on the idea to continue taking The Gospel to the jews, and decided to "take it to the gentiles" exclusevily. also, he started talking about the jews as a distant and separate group of people, like he did not feel a connection or bond with them anymore, after ALL sorts of persecution by his own ethnic people (the jews), he finally realized that being a Christian (a follower of Christ) was what it really mattered.
Philippians 3 : 2 to 8
2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the CONCISION.
3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE FLESH.
4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more:
5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
7 But what things were gain to me, those I COUNTED LOSS FOR CHRIST.
8 Yea doubtless, and I COUNT ALL THINGS BUT LOSS FOR THE EXCELLENCY OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF CHRIST JESUS MY LORD: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but DUNG, that I may win Christ,
@@condorcondorito2303
Paul was a false apostle. Jesus warned you not to believe Paul or you would be deceived, Matt 24:23-26. 12 not 13.
@@sanmcnellis94
What part of what Paul taught & preached in YOUR opinion was false and should not be heard and discarded???
some Jews follow strictly the Torah, you can not lump all jews as under the talmud. I am Christain an listen to some Torah teachers as long as they dont teach Kabbalah.
Talmud is what they follow
Darby was a bad man. There is no pre-tribe rapture. It js all ruptured .
He sounds like stephen Anderson with antisemitic and anti pretrib rapture nonsense, so sad
Wrong , in fact Christ never recognised unrepentant Jews as being Jews
It looks like the chickens have come home to roost for Adam.
Everytime I scroll this man appears "critizing" everyone and anything. Wouldn't it be better to go out into the real world, find a job, earn an honest wage and be a witness to those who are perishing without Christ
yes
making fun of people always make people look like donkey asses to me. even if they are right.
WOW this young man is so wrong.
He probably doesn't like God's plans for the remnant of Israel
God will NOT put His church through the tribulation. The tribulation will be horrific
The globalists at the "World Economic Forum" have said by 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be "happy". Meanwhile many in the modern Church claim we do not need to be concerned about global government. The truth is found below.
What does an understanding of the New Covenant do to the Pretrib Rapture doctrine?
Since the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20, how is the New Covenant Church age going to end seven years before the Second Coming of Christ? Why would anyone think God is going back to the Old Covenant system now made “obsolete” by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13? We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
The Capitol "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found. In Revelation 12:11 we find those under the blood of the Lamb. A person cannot be under the blood of the Lamb and not be a part of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ. Verse 12 of this passage proves at least part of the tribulation period is the wrath of Satan upon the people of God.
Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
"It may come as a surprise to most pre-Trib prophecy students that the post-Trib position (in its primitive form) is the oldest point of view."
(The quotation above is from the book "Will You Escape The Tribulation? RAPTURE [Under Attack]", by Tim LaHaye, copyright 1998, Page 197.) Tim LaHaye was co-author of the “Left Behind” books and movies which have convinced millions of modern Christians that the Church age ends seven years before the Second Coming of Christ. Recently, Pastor Matt Furse of Mountain View Baptist Church in Custer, S.D. has written a book titled “Which One Is Right?’, which reveals the recent history of the pretrib rapture doctrine, and the fact it does not agree with what is written in the King James Bible.
The gathering of the Church is described at the end of 1 Thess. Chapter 4, and the timing of the event is found in chapter 5. The word “But” in the first verse of chapter 5 connects the two chapters, and the words “we” and “sleep” in verse 10 of chapter 5 prove the two chapters are connected.
The Greek words for “wrath” and “tribulation” are not the same word, as proven by the verse below.
Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Watch the RUclips video “Pretribulation Paradox” by former pretrib believer skydiver626.
9:35 "all the -isms" but hes a "baptist". If you just go by the Bible you should be Lutheran
The middle point the anchoring basis for Christianity is martyrdom a living being had to die for the sins of all men and women so that’s the conceptual basis forever and for always good life will be hard ugly and mean and that’s how you based your life wow
So many lies just spewing from this man’s heart => just total nonsense!
I read somewhere that the Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew and the New Testament was written in Greek. Saying they changed the Hebrew to Greek. So it’s not completely the same meaning anymore? That the Old Testament was for the Jews to understand and their way of life . The New Testament was written to teach the gentiles? Can you please explain the difference? You are saying it’s for all yet we shouldn’t follow the law? I’m confused .
Theresa Heller Check out Unlearn the lies by Lex Meyer. I believe the whole Bible is for everyone. I had a baptist preacher tell me the red letters were for the Jews!!! Most churches have most things wrong. Unlearn the lies, trunews are two sites that have most things right.
Ok. The Old Testament was speaking to the people of the Hebrew speaking Israelites.
God used them as a nation back then until Christ came to exemplify basic theological ideas.
They're later referenced as symbols/examples in the New Testament.
While that he also gave them secular laws as a nation and practical rules for everyday life.
As back then the full truth as in the New Testament wasn't there yet, he gave them also a very guided way on how to do worship.
That contained back then a lot of physical activity and objects.
That's how you learn.
These two latter parts were then no more needed because Jesus himself arrived, explained everything, fulfilled everything, gave the Holy Spirit for better understanding.
New Testament Christians are more "abstract" kind of.
We believe Jesus died for our sins and rose from the dead.
But imagine telling someone in the Old Testament times: one day someone will come and be killed in your place and that is giving you already now forgiveness.
Instead God thought it would be wise to teach them very practically:
* You are a sinner, separated from God
* The price of sin is death
* But God came up with a solution: he will replace the one to be killed
* Not the sinner is dying, but in his mercy God allows to exchange you for a clean animal to be sacrificed once a year (= important part of OT worship)
* But punishment was necessary, but grace allowed to have someone/something else in your place
* At the same time God pointed out already that this is just a teaching example for back then and the real thing still to come
* God became man himself to let himself be killed instead of us
* Since Jesus came, all these physical examples in the reoccurring worship were no more necessary
Also with the real thing walking in person on earth there was no need anymore for a sample nation to exemplify religious ideas via physical symbols that became perverted over time.
So, both the secular government parts/practical life rules as well as the old symbolic/physical worship rites were abolished in the New Testament.
They are only used as theoretical examples from history in the New Testament.
Now the main things in worship are preaching the Bible (it's core the law and Gospel), and two slightly physical things: baptism with the WORD and water and the supper with bread and wine and Christ's body and blood present in it.
Today we're "merely" circumcised on the heart, crossing the Red Sea in our baptism symbolically, Jesus being our Passover lamb, no slaughterhouse in the church necessary anymore.
The OT temple was a huge slaughterhouse operation.
Countless animals sacrificed in a day.
We don't need that anymore.
God used it in his wisdom back then for their limited understanding.
The New Testament was written in Koine Greek by St. Paul, a well educated former jewish rabbi living in different parts of the Roman empire.
Koine Greek was something like common English, the world language back then.
Further St. Luke was a Roman himself, writing an account on what happened in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts, other writers of the NT were exiled to other parts of the Roman empire. Like St. John, St. Peter, etc.
And, yes, the audience was now no more mainly the one nation to exemplify religious concepts in a very drastic physical way.
But now, since the feast of Pentecost (Book of Acts), all nations were invited to come to the table.
Also now the single person was addressed more directly.
Before there was more dealing with the leaders of a nation, of a family, a tribe.
Now the harvest out of all nations.
Today God would use English as koine Greek was the world language.
And Luke definitely never started out in Hebrew and translated later because his mother tongue never was Hebrew.
And as Palestine was under Roman rule all the apostles were definitely capable of speaking koine Greek the world language back then.
It's again funny myths that it all started differently and we would need some back to what no one knows Hebrew and then come again into our modern languages.
That's the Hebrew New Testament movement.
They don't show how they got there.
They just make you believe that this is what they might have said in Hebrew instead and now here it is in English.
There's no reason to doubt the content of the very early Greek manuscripts we have in fragments even from the time of the apostles and their direct students sitting at their feet.
There's 10.000s of manuscripts scattered all over the Mediterranean sea region from the earliest moments.
Faking impossible.
@@Joe-mk3ii unlearn the lies may be the biggest liar out there! Oh the irony is so thick anymore! That guys sole mission is to put you back under the law by claiming that we can't trust the word of God! And yes, he uses Scripture to prove his point, but so does every cult leader! Jesus is the Word and the Word proclaims that those who are in Christ are no longer under the law.
Romans 10:4:
"For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth"
He is a deciever of the worst kind! My goodness!
@@flman9684 Romans 10, The whole chapter is about righteousness. You pick out 1 verse and twist interpret it to mean Jesus died so we could sin.
Nevertheless it's not it's talking about Israel and maybe you should say that instead of pretend you're not lying
search ancient teachings on rapture
Ephraim the Syrian on the rapture
And how does the Messiah return to the temple and bring Deliverance to Zion less you completely misuse words right how does the Messiah drool from his throne in in Zion how did the Jews fulfill the promises to the latter half of the book of all the prophets to be restored to their own land
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
Watch the RUclips videos "The New Covenant" by Bob George, and "New Covenant Theology Made Simple" by David H. J. Gay.
Not at all it's covenant theology that falls apart. The covenant is a land promise. Israel has never possessed the land. The Temple has to be rebuilt. Water must flow from it.
@@morganfrmn Do you think Joshua was confused below?
Jos 21:43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
In the passage below Jesus said the "son" is the "heir" to the land and the kingdom would be taken from those who reject Him as the "chief cornerstone" and it would be given to another nation bearing fruit.
Mat 21:37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.
Mat 21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
Mat 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Mat 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
That "holy nation" which accepts the "chief cornerstone" is found below.
1Pe 2:4 To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of God, and precious,
1Pe 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
1Pe 2:6 Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded.
1Pe 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
1Pe 2:8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.
1Pe 2:9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
1Pe 2:10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.
@@SpotterVideo The land promised goes to the Euphrates River. And in Zach there is a temple with a river flowing from it. I suppose you are not premillennial either
@@SpotterVideo You just disproved your self.
Matt 21:43. Jesus was rejected by the Jews. We are called the church. Eklaseea. No where are we called Israel.
@@morganfrmn
Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
Jas 1:2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations;
Jas 1:3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.
Wow….ok, so
Jesus was a Jewish man and all of the disciples were as well. They were well versed in all Jewish traditions and scripture. At the last supper, Jesus ordained the disciples the priest of the new religion Christianity according to the law God laid out to Moses and Aaron ordaining the priesthood of the Levites in the sins of Aaron. later, he gave Peter the keys to his (Jesus) kingdom, setting Peter at the top of the newly ordained priests (disciples ). Please study the Old Testament and the giving of keys to a trusted person. Jesus didn’t stop there. He said whatever you bind on earth, will be bound in heaven. Whatever you loose on earth, will be loosed in heaven knowing that these men and. Men they ordained after themselves would need to address issues that would come up. These disciples spread out and started churches in an area, ordaining priest and bishops and leaving them in charge of the established church. The disciples, now apostles, would move on to the next area writing letters back to the bishop in the towns they had just left, these would be the churches of Ephesus, Corninth, etc. these letters were a way to keep everything stable in the churches they had established and keep moving establishing new churches. The book of revelation starts out w Jesus telling John that he must tell his 7 churches to get in shape or punishment would come to them. This is the establishment of the Catholic Church. All priest in the Catholic Church can be traced back to the apostles of Jesus. Peter, the man Jesus gave the keys to was the first pope.
Here is the lineage of popes from Peter to Sylvester. They existed in Rome, but were constantly martyred, so they were “underground”
Peter
Linus
Anacletus 157-168
Clement
Evaristus
Alexander I
Sixtus I
Telesphorus
Hyginus
Pius I
Anicetus
Soter
Eleutherius
Victor I
Zephyrinus
Callixtus I
Urban I
Pontian
Anterus
Fabian
Cornelius
Lucius I
Stephen I
Sixtus II
Dionysius
Felix
Eutychian
Caius
Marcellinus
Marcellus
Eusebius
Miltiades
Sylvester
107AD IGNATIOUS of Loyola “wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church”
313 Emperor Constantine of the Roman Empire came into union w the existing Catholic Church (under Pope Sylvester) and gave them the protection of Roman Empire and an official geographical location for the headquarters, Rome. He also made Catholicism the official religion of the Roman Empire, calling it the Roman Catholic Church
cute story!! you forgetting our apostle Paul who is our pattern today for the body of christ and the apostle to the gentiles. and he was given several mysteries kept secret since the beginning of the world Pete and James didnt know teach or preach before Paul's conversion in acts 9!!
Peter and James were preaching the gospel of the kingdom/ gospel of the circumcision , the catholic lineage is from peter who started the early jew church before the body was revealed to Paul so your following the wrong apostle the wrong message the wrong church and the wrong succession!
1timothy 1:16
Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
2 Tim 1:11
Whereunto I am appointed a preacher, and an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.
Paul is the only one with the title apostle to or of the gentiles!!
Romans 11:13
For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
Ephesians 2:11-12
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
Ephesians 3:1-6
For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:
What about Dr Kim who is preaching dispensationalism and so many listening to him.....Very rare to find a church that preaches that we are saved by grace and not by RACE!!
Dr Kim is not mentally well nor intellectually sound.
There may be different forms of what ppl mean by dispensationalism. Are there different Ages? Reading Job where God speaks, I just love it, he walked through the base of the mountains of the deep -- way before Science even knew they were they there! Today I found in Ezekiel a statement about the "fishes" going along "paths". Modern Science is waaaay behind.
I've been at this 60 yrs. Key is, Don't let someone else (even an angel from heaven) TELL you what is in the Bible. Because Jesus Christ said John 3:13 No man has ascended into heaven. Peter preached David was not in heaven. Take one subject is the way I did it, so you don't get overwhelmed. But our reward is in heaven, waiting till the Resurrection, when Christ shall stand on the Mount of Olives, where He ascended. The whole thing will split in two, kinda like a meteor strike. Christ will rule from a rebuilt Jerusalem. Also
the 12 tribes , 12,000 of each, will have a "gate"? I'd have to look up. The 12 Apostles have special places in a PHYSICAL Temple. Those in the first resurrection will reign with Christ for a 1000 yrs. On Earth. Moreover , Revelation says the Ancient of Days came down. Christ said No one had seen the Fsther's face or heard his voice at any time. How could that be?
Just good study subjects. Gen. and Revelations fit like a glove, love reading them.
The race thing only comes in with the Israelite Tribes (Not just Judah, which will have to have a Big Change) comes in bc God is STILL
trying to fulfill His Promise to Abraham, having had to deal with their rebellion while TRYing to bless them. Musta been irritating, :)))
Okay, Day of Trumpets has come on. It's sunset. No Im not Jewish lol!
Kook
@@stevecarlson2242 explain yourself kook says nothing
@@sevenbravo1805
kook
/ko͞ok/
a crazy or eccentric person
Anyone who blathers on about the pretrib rapture which cannot be found in scripture - yet talks confidently as if it were - is either crazy as a bed bug - or an agent of deception.
The Arrogance
I can't believe how you so casually state that "being saved is believing on Jesus Christ, and that alone". How convenient for you; a license to sin. What, did you altogether lose the Book of James? You know, the one that says "Faith without works is dead", like a body without a spirit is too? Did you lose the Gospel where the VERY FIRST words recorded from Jesus' mouth at the beginning of His ministry are; "REPENT, and believe"? Did you lose the part where Jesus tells the woman He spared from being stoned to "Go and sin no more"? No, you didn't, yet you just cling to the verse where it says "Believe, and ye shall be saved". Argh, and you talk about others who have bad teachings. Well, today.. I worry for your salvation, 'O preacher.
"Follow peace with all men, and HOLINESS, without which NO MAN shall see the Lord" ~Hebrews
So did Jesus save you from hell or are you “saving” yourself?
m.ruclips.net/video/PFMc11gIMeM/видео.html
@S.L. So you think you can keep cheating on your wife after marriage and still claim to "love" her? Is that love, having sex with other women? And is she the idiot to believe you? Is Jesus an idiot, because He said "If you love me, keep my commandments."
STUMBLING into sin is not the same as walking up to a computer, switching it on, finding a pornography site by typing into a search engine, unzipping your pants, pulling out your penis, masturbating while watching other men and women engage in debauchery, ejaculating, cleaning up after yourself and then putting your penis away. Still don't comprehend? Is this why Jesus said "You MUST be born again"?, so you can indulge in filth over and over because Jesus was brutally tortured, humiliated and murdered for you? Before I give you Scripture, after Scripture, after Scripture, after Scripture, let me ask you; why did Jesus tell us, figuratively or not, to chop off our own hand if it causes us to sin? Why did He tell us to pluck out our eye if it causes us to sin? Why would He say that if sin cannot keep us from Him? Better it is to enter Heaven maimed than enter hell full-bodied, THAT'S what He said. But you need more Scripture do you? You call ME "unbelievable" do you? Wow, unbelievable.
So, Scripture? You want Scripture? You mean more than the ones I have already supplied, like "...without HOLINESS, NO ONE shall see the Lord"? But more Scripture, is that what it takes? Of course you NEED to sin, so you will find any excuse to keep doing it and continue to use the Grace of Christ as a floor matt where you can wipe your dirty feet. Ok, buckle up, here comes The Scripture;
"For if we sin WILLFULLY after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remain NO MORE sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgement and fiery indignation.."
~Book of Hebrews
"Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, IF thou CONTINUE in goodness, OTHERWISE, thou shalt be CUT OFF"
~Book of Romans
"Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, AND the ACKNOWLEDGING of the truth which is after GODLINESS."
~Book of Titus
"And that He died for all, that they which live SHOULD NOT HENCEFORTH LIVE UNTO THEMSELVES, but unto Him which died for them"
~Book of II Corinthians
"According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should BE HOLY and WITHOUT BLAME before Him.."
~Book of Ephesians
"Be ye angry, and SIN NOT"
~Book of Ephesians
"Whosever transgresseth, and abide not in the DOCTRINE of Christ, HATH NOT GOD."
~Book of II John
"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth... seeing that ye have PUT OFF the old man WITH HIS DEEDS, and have PUT ON THE NEW MAN, which is RENEWED in the knowledge after the image of Him.."
~Book of Colossians
"For God hath not called us to uncleanness, but UNTO HOLINESS."
~Book of I Thessalonians
"Seeing then that all these these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in ALL HOLY BEHAVIOR and GODLINESS...?"
~Book of II Peter
"KEEP THYSELF PURE"
~Book of
"But with whom was He grieved forty years? Was it not with then THAT HAD SINNED, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?"
~Book of Hebrews
"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall NOT INHERIT the Kingdom of God?"
~Book of I Corinthians
"He that saith he abideth in Him ought himself also so to walk EVEN AS HE WALKED."
~Book of I John
"For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example , that YE SHOULD FOLLOW HIS STEPS, who DID NO SIN.."
~Book of I Peter
"..that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled IN US, who walk NOT AFTER THE FLESH, but after the spirit."
~Book of Romans
"For the eyes of the Lord are over THE RIGHTEOUS."
~Book of I Peter
"For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the DOERS of the law SHALL BE JUSTIFIED."
~Bool of Romans
"But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I MAKE MYSELF A TRANSGRESSOR."
~Book of Galatians
"For we must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ: that every one may receive the things DONE in his body, according to that he hath DONE, whether it be good or bad."
~Book of II Corinthians
"We then, as workers together with Him, beseech you also that ye receive not the grace of God IN VAIN."
~Book of II Corinthians
"For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward; HOW SHALL WE ESCAPE, if we NEGLECT so great salvation?"
~Book of Hebrews
"Whosever abideth in Him SINNETH NOT. Whosever sinneth HATH NOT SEEN HIM, NEITHER KNOWN HIM.. Let no man deceive you: he that DOETH RIGHTEOUSNESS is righteous.. He that COMMITTETH SIN is OF THE DEVIL.."
~Book of I John
I can go on and on and on and on.. Oh S.L, didn't you know that you MUST be born again?
"Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin, because he is born of God."
~Book of I John
Did Darby get the plages of Revelation?
Darby is probably in hell for heresy and leading sheep there with him
@@Stretchgangin let's at least b honest about the man. Doctrines bread confusion and separation. Yahsua died to fix this
@@mlw8998 Are we speaking of Stephen Darby? Yall are so confused if you think he's false.
@Tom Price Oh ok, well yeah that's right.
Ephraim the Syrian on the rapture
Did Darby lose his salvation?
he was never saved
Leonard Allen no.
Which Darby are we speaking of because there's a pastor named Stephen Darby and he speaks straight truth.
Darby family members had lived in the most hunted castle called 'Leap Castle' in 18-21centuries. The early residents O`Carolls could be of giant race. Darby's
latter fam meber was also an occult nobelist. The dark spirit ppl were drawn to the Leap Castle. Look at Darby he look very possesed. Even Scofield, he has a different spirit, NOT the Holy Spirit. (btw, my gift is discerning.)
>>The O’Carrolls, princes of Ely, whose chief stronghold this castle was, were all big men, in face, a race of giants, as the few relics of them extant attest.
>>A little below this is a remarkable room, which none of the servants will enter after nightfall. It was a state bedroom of one of the princess of Ely, who was murdered six centuries ago by her lord, and the solid oak door retains the bloodstains of the royal victim. This part of the building is reputed to be haunted
>>A gothic horror writer who often featured the castle in her work, Mrs. Darby was also fascinated by the occult. She conducted multiple séances in the castle’s corridors, and some believe that her communications with the other side is what awoke the Elemental.
@Eonian Sage God will let us know who are real ignorant... will see! i even feel we r already in the last 7yrs!
Her Priests!!! Are you a priest
I didn’t hear any of this preacher or pastor teaching I’m sorry 😐.
It's your soul you are feeling sorry for
Did you try turning your hearing aid up?
great sermon! thanks.
You’re not allowed anything soft you’re everything is rough hewn your movement is a throwback to when white dudes were important not like they are now and I’m a white dude it up just let me know
You are explaning for a lot of time what a wolf is. In Darbys time there was a sleeping church that was the remenent of the reformation = Sardis, a death church. Filadelfia is the next coming up = Darby. Sorry brother repant and read your bible again.
eugenius kubiczek Are you sure it wasn't Effasus??? Lol
yeah the Filadelphia church age was a golden age wasn't it?
The 1800s, the so-called philadelphian church age, saw the rise of more false doctrine than any other "age". So the 7 church age doctrine is deeply flawed in its logic. Unless you think Mormonism, Jehovah's witnesses, 7th day adventism and dispensationalism are all true religions that came out of that "church age"
Mike Harrison there is some truth to it maybe. Lines up in places.
But really they are just future churches in the tribulation John is referring to.
If God gave up on His chosen remnant of Israel He would give up on us
Where does this young man think that Darby was a works salvation.
The rapture is very soon
define dispensation in english please. don't change the meaning of the word.
Did you really say that men could receive salvation as far back as Genesis 4? Simply by believing in the Lord? It's amazing how far from Scripture you preach. If Salvation was readily available to all prior to the crucifixion of Christ, then the sacrifice Christ made was in vain. You are completely in error and teach heresy.
Nonsense who did Christ go gather from abraham bosom
Sinners saved by faith through grace
You are the false one here
@@jgvtc559 The souls in Abraham's Bosom were NOT saved prior to Jesus' sacrifice at the cross. Quite simple really. You can't change the order in which the Lord laid everything out in.
@@Vhladd1 this is the dominant teaching in all Covenant Theological seminaries today.
If you mention dispensational salvations they will blow a head gasket brother! And then you try to explain what you mean by citing the exact fact that you pointed out, and they try to drive home their position even more!
And boy are you ever correct when you made mention of the fact that their theology on salvation makes what He did at Calvary insignificant in their eyes! Of course they will deny that, but it does! God bless you and yours brother! He is coming soon indeed!
Moses spoke of Christ, please do your homework
@@blake9358 Moses did speak of Jesus, the Messiah, The Christ. However, one is ONLY saved through the blood of the Christ......that blood had not been shed yet in Moses' time. Do your homework. It's simple "cause & effect". Salvation is the result of the penalty paid on the Cross through the shedding of the blood and death of the Christ; until that moment, Salvation was not in effect.
Add steves name to famose heretics of the 21st century...
And Jon calvin
This preach needs to read Matthew 7:1 & apply it to himself. And, he’s a replacement theologist. John Hagee could set you straight….or Allen Nolan.
I have a weird idea what is the Jews are just a different religion and it’s got nothing to do with you leave them alone have a great time
? Gen 2:9
here is a dispensation Old Testament and New Testament your Bible is divided in half what would you called that? Are we to build an ark because of a flood? Do we keep the Law or not? Is there a fruit I must not eat 🤔 please show us master shifu 😂
its not a dispensation, they are Testaments or a covenants
Law of Liberty The point is, there is a division right? old from new?
H
God has always had one people. The blessings are in Jesus. He is the True vine. He is the Son who is called out of Egypt (Hosea, read fulfillment in Gospel of Matthew. He is Good Shepherd, John 10. He tells us that He has other sheep of a different fold. He is the true seed. He will out of two make one, Jews and Gentiles, that is the Church. There is more but it is late for me. Look it up. God bless!,
You could be a wolf are you not?
darby preached a Christ for sinners that is ok
Stephen Darby was the realest preacher I ever heard, and it was because of him my relationship with God has grown so much.
It’s john Darby
It seems to me that he refuses to go to Greek because “the Bible is it’s own dictionary”…another classic Ruckmanite teaching. Supported by Ruckmanite followers like Gale Riplinger especially. It’s like this group left Ruckmanism after his death, but held on to all of his wacko teachings.
Why do those that preach against dispensationalism always misrepresent what they believe?
What did I say wrong?
Why do proponents of dispensationalism always argue against straw men? Oh, snap, see what I did there? 🤣
You're out of you're mind.... God's NOT done with Israel. You make God a liar.
It's not called "the great tribulation" it's called "Jacobs trouble". Aka Israels trouble
Yes, the NT teaches that God is done with Israel but only as a nation. Jew and Gentile are now "one new man in Christ".
contemplate
God's not done with Israel. You need to study.
And what version are you quoting "one new man in Christ" from?? Its not the King James I know that. Or your paraphrasing and just adding quotes (which is very dishonest).
Dave Maxwell There's no salvation outside of Christ. So why would that matter. Can you show me a single, clear passage where Jesus, Paul, or any other NT writer states that Jews will be saved nationally on the basis of ethnicity?
Ephesians chapter 2
Dave Maxwell The one new man is in the king james. Think it says of twain one new man. But that is referring to the body of Christ in this age. God is going back to the Jews. How could folks think God was done with the Jews after reading Romans chapter 11 once? Or reading the prophets. Nothing but boastful pride...and that according to Romans 11 is why God is going back to the Jews when he does. When the fulness of the Gentiles is come.
King James had his own Bible written why can’t that guy
Because it's about what the original texts say.