@@Nickle314You mean he was banned from making false statements under oath without consequences? Yeah they would be a good reason to self censor in court.
@@sircrapalot9954 Present your evidence. Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications In particular why did the judge say someone in the executive branch waas not allowed to put his defence that he had this privilege.
@@Nickle314 Q. Are there limits to the invocation of executive privilege? A. Yes, there are. Courts have not had much to say about executive privilege, but in the 1974 case over President Richard Nixon’s refusal to release Oval Office recordings as part of the Watergate investigation, the Supreme Court held that the privilege is not absolute. In other words, the case for turning over documents or allowing testimony may be more compelling than arguments for withholding them. Indeed, in that context, the court ruled 8-0 that Nixon had to turn over the tapes. This is from an APNews article about executive privilege. I’d link it but RUclips doesn’t like outside links anymore.
This guy is being prosecuted for sharing his opinion. How many democrats were prosecuted for swearing they'd impeach Trump, for example, shortly after he won? Exactly. This is stupid...
@user, like many of your kind, you are not intelligent enough to define Nazi, which is a far right ideology. Now visit your local library and try to learn more about history. You then wouldn't make ridiculous comments on RUclips.
@lorddavidlawrenceNavarro was legally subpoenaed, tried to appeal/dismiss the subpoena and lost, then simply didn’t show up as required. That’s why he was convicted of Contempt of Congress. In your example, you’d have to at least show up in court to plead “not guilty.” He didn’t even have the decency to do that and just assert his 5th Amendment rights at every question.
@@sircrapalot9954 Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications He has the legal right to say no. Why did the judge not allow him to present his defence?
@@Nickle314Navarro made a blanket “executive privilege” claim without specifics. That doesn’t fly in court. He has to state where the privilege applies and why. What you’re claiming, that the court “wouldn’t let him present his defense,” is misleading at best. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
I feel bad for this guy. He must have nobody in his life to talk to. He just forced all those people to listen to him for like 15 minutes is he rambled on about nothing. He didn't show up and respond to a congressional subpoena after he was told that it was a lawful subpoena and he had to respond to it. I bet you. Are the only people he talked to all week. I mean other than the ones that he pays to listen like his lawyers
7 million people illegally crossed the border since Biden. Federal immigration law was broken. Obviously they are above the Way above the law. Right poly? I too Intelligent to need five emojis.
“We are going down a very dangerous path” what kind of gibberish is spilling out of this face with a hole. He shouldn’t even be able to walk out of the court after being lawfully convicted of defying congress! Was Eric convicted? Then dont use him as an example
hey Trumpists, its about the facts and the law.... oh and our constitutional rights. I used to love federal charges but now I love state charges because the president can't pardon state convictions easily.
I think we all have contempt at this stage. 1st ammendment rights disappearing , stay tuned to find out if we are already living in a communist state. 2024 Trump
Who is feeling pinched by inflation in audience’s asked in room of regular working people! Everyone’s hand went UP! Almost 99% of people working are having troubles paying bills, like rent to mortgages, Food to Utilities like water sewer trash! The shock is insurance from car, insurance health, life insurance and rental insurance to liability accidents for home to rental property! there is nothing that hasn’t gone up by double digits in the last three years since the pandemic started! From Israeli to USA the pain is felt Gov. is important to stop the crisis instead is fueling it…Soon The People will be rioting like In Lebanon if Gov. doesn’t Stop the companies Profiteering from this mess!
England is like garden of Eden after Brexit innit? I mean economy is booming, people are happy with lower costs of everything from food to mortgages right? And golden boy Boris, fabulous. Now go to closest beach and try to dip in ecoly flawoured benefits of Brexit to cool down a little bit mate.
Sad, this guy just wants to speak, and morons in the background can't keep their disrespecting mouths shut. Very sad. *This will be an important case to watch going forward.*
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government Judge says I'm banning your defence.
You keep repeating this all over the comment section and you’re still wrong. Blanket claims of “executive privilege” are not an automatic win. The defense has to successfully argue where and why the privilege applies to withholding specific evidence. The court determines if the interest of executive privilege overrules the importance of turning over the evidence. Navarro’s blanket executive privilege defense was insufficient, and the subpoena was not quashed. He had to appear and testify to Congress under oath per the subpoena. He could have exercised his 5th amendment rights and refused to answer appropriate questions, but he couldn’t be arsed to even show up in the first place. Actions have consequences. Navarro spurned the legal system and is paying the appropriate price. Isn’t that what “law and order” is supposed to be?
@@sircrapalot9954 The defense has to successfully argue where and why the privilege applies to withholding specific evidence ==== Correct. The judge however said you are not even allowed to argue or present that. You've admitted he could use that as an argument. Quite reasonable. However the judge wants a guilty verdict so says you can't. What we have have is legal warfare where the swamp is trying to prevent Trump being elected, with the consequences to them.
@@Nickle314 From a Politico article on Aug 30: Navarro has long claimed that Trump asserted privilege to block him from appearing before the Jan. 6 select committee in early 2022 when the panel subpoenaed him. But Navarro has never produced direct evidence to back that claim and, more importantly, Trump and his attorneys have repeatedly declined to say whether Navarro was accurately reflecting their conversations. Mehta cited Trump’s refusal to corroborate Navarro’s claims as the most compelling reason that he found Trump did not, in fact, seek to block Navarro’s testimony to the select committee. “There was no formal invocation of executive privilege by [Trump] after personal consideration nor authorization to Mr. Navarro to invoke privilege on his behalf,” Mehta said. TL;DR: Navarro’s defense invoking executive privilege didn’t hold water because he couldn’t provide evidence that his interactions were covered under the privilege, and the president’s own lawyers haven’t substantiated Navarro’s claim. So he still had to show up in Congress to testify.
Actually if the court knows his job description they already know executive privilege was not applicable. Ergo his defense would be like this impromptu gossip sesh - a lot of wasted time on everyone’s parts.
"They wont let me talk!" he said, talking to all major news networks and broadcast around the world.
He was banned from making the obvious defence in court. That's means the statement is correct.
@@Nickle314You mean he was banned from making false statements under oath without consequences? Yeah they would be a good reason to self censor in court.
@@sircrapalot9954 Present your evidence.
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications
In particular why did the judge say someone in the executive branch waas not allowed to put his defence that he had this privilege.
@@sircrapalot9954wake up fool
@@Nickle314 Q. Are there limits to the invocation of executive privilege?
A. Yes, there are. Courts have not had much to say about executive privilege, but in the 1974 case over President Richard Nixon’s refusal to release Oval Office recordings as part of the Watergate investigation, the Supreme Court held that the privilege is not absolute. In other words, the case for turning over documents or allowing testimony may be more compelling than arguments for withholding them. Indeed, in that context, the court ruled 8-0 that Nixon had to turn over the tapes.
This is from an APNews article about executive privilege. I’d link it but RUclips doesn’t like outside links anymore.
Funny how the guy who helped to fuel the divide is now moaning about the dangerous divide
Cheater biden won fake election
Spot on!
Did anyone notice he mentioned about left Marxist and division but didn’t mention the the far right?
@@queeniebaby100 he’s just name dropping. I was surprised he didn’t also say satanist 🤣🤣
This guy is being prosecuted for sharing his opinion. How many democrats were prosecuted for swearing they'd impeach Trump, for example, shortly after he won? Exactly. This is stupid...
My main worry is lack of remorse by Trump's co-defendants. No one is remorseful
@user, like many of your kind, you are not intelligent enough to define Nazi, which is a far right ideology. Now visit your local library and try to learn more about history. You then wouldn't make ridiculous comments on RUclips.
@lorddavidlawrence That's why this Fascist enabler was found guilty by a jury. Because he is guilty.
He was banned from making the obvious defence.
@@Nickle314no his defense was garbage
@@mytruecrimelibrary Why wasn't he allowed to use executive privilidge as a defence?
Fun fact Peter Navarro didn’t present a defence in court
@lorddavidlawrenceNavarro was legally subpoenaed, tried to appeal/dismiss the subpoena and lost, then simply didn’t show up as required. That’s why he was convicted of Contempt of Congress.
In your example, you’d have to at least show up in court to plead “not guilty.” He didn’t even have the decency to do that and just assert his 5th Amendment rights at every question.
Fun fact. The judge said he wasn't allowed to present his defence.
@@sircrapalot9954
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications
He has the legal right to say no.
Why did the judge not allow him to present his defence?
@@Nickle314Navarro made a blanket “executive privilege” claim without specifics. That doesn’t fly in court. He has to state where the privilege applies and why.
What you’re claiming, that the court “wouldn’t let him present his defense,” is misleading at best.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
@@Nickle314fun fact Navarro ignored a congressional subpeona.
That is illegal.
Case closed.
Did he really call the left Marxist after claiming trying to have an "honest" discussion?
They’re inventing reality as they go and they tail at same folks for not confirming to their dreamworld.
The left are Marxists, can't get more truthful than that!
why didn't he just go and say "I don't recall" like every law-breaking official does?
I feel bad for this guy. He must have nobody in his life to talk to. He just forced all those people to listen to him for like 15 minutes is he rambled on about nothing. He didn't show up and respond to a congressional subpoena after he was told that it was a lawful subpoena and he had to respond to it. I bet you. Are the only people he talked to all week. I mean other than the ones that he pays to listen like his lawyers
Took the jury just 3 hours to find you guilty ….. says it all…
Yes tainted juries are a dime a dozen. Grand juries are even easier to stack.
Not an ounce of remorse. Disgusting
No one is ABOVE the law, especially deceitful, evil people like this pratt 😮🇬🇧🌈🇺🇦🙏
Go to hell Ukraine
That includes joe and Hunter Biden then ???
But of course you know nothing about that ..
Buy the way .Do you support Azov battalion?
7 million people illegally crossed the border since Biden. Federal immigration law was broken. Obviously they are above the Way above the law. Right poly? I too Intelligent to need five emojis.
Trump and his minions will learn the meaning of the law. Accountability is coming.
Persecution of political opponents
LMAO, you mean how Biden's cheating globalist minions helped him win by rigging the election? Learning the meaning of the law did you say? lol. Fool!!
What law would that be? You're about to learn the consequences of fascist weaponized law enforcement.
He's going to look SO GOOD in orange.
His ego is huge
Trump & ALL his republican associates NEED an intervention and a TIMEOUT 🤕🤕🤕
They will win, and this time they will take revenge.
All of them will be in jail. @@Nickle314
@@Nickle314If they knew they were going to win we wouldn't have had situations like the Michigan fake electors in 2020.
@@Nickle314 moron 🤕😵😵💫🤪🤮🤐😆😜😝
That's rich ("this is nuts") coming from this guy, who was an integral part of planning and executing a coup of the American democracy!!
“We are going down a very dangerous path” what kind of gibberish is spilling out of this face with a hole. He shouldn’t even be able to walk out of the court after being lawfully convicted of defying congress! Was Eric convicted? Then dont use him as an example
He wasn't allowed to present his defence by the judge. I wonder why?
@@Nickle314because the judge decided it was nonsense. That's what judges do.
He deserved it. He was guilty of contempt. It's a shame that Herr Navarro is given any air time at all.
Some people accept to lose their dignity to save a madman, like trump😅Trump's actions already disqualified him to occupy 🏢 officials office
What actions would that be? It's easy for an idiot to accuse with no intelligent follow up. Like you did
@@KaiserBlade 🙄 !
Book him, Dano
The REPUGNANT moral landscape that the GOP inhabits makes a vote for Joe Biden an unquestionable DUTY to my Country, my Children and to Myself.
And to your dead relatives to vote in by mail
Attorneys running from liar
The sleepy fascist “right” . Lock them up
Jim Jordan is guilty of the same thing. Why is he still loose ???
Hopefully Gym's time will come.
Jim might be getting obstruction if he keeps messing with the state case in Georgia.
He is guilty and should do JAIL TIME! Yackity Yack it don't hack.
Woman in the background needs help:
Somebody just touched me... liar... I want to press charges...
Eric Holder and Lois Lerner . Same crime.
hey Trumpists, its about the facts and the law.... oh and our constitutional rights. I used to love federal charges but now I love state charges because the president can't pardon state convictions easily.
How to live in peace, humanity and equality now follows..
Now..4 months later..they can go after Hunter now
All Trump's guys off to prison?
Trump surrounds himself with people who would otherwise be on park benches in their pajamas, feeding pigeons and ranting at passersby.
San Diego's blessed not having him as a city council.
Gorgo. You think that is an intelligent comment? Really?
@@KaiserBlade I do, in fact. But thanks for trolling, comrade!
"People will not let me talk..." he says into the microphone
😂😂😂
what a disgrace, sad to see what is happening in USA
The witchhunt rolls on.
Voting Republican!
You cannot have the second time or the next one, if the first time hasn't yet occurred.
How can you DEMAND respect?! If Congress is contemptible, why shouldn't people treat it with contempt?
She is brilliant
Anonymously.
Nobody has "executive privilege" to commit crimes.
Except Joe Biden taking Chinese bribes and holding secret documents
BIG MISTAKE ON AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, TIME FOR PAYING BACK ON WHAT YOU DID
What a muppet show... all of it. 😂
Anyone want to guess if he serves any time?
Usa so selfish
Trump was really speaking honestly
The innocent need not be compelled to testify. The innocent are more than happy to cooperate and testify willingly. He’s low hanging fruit!
Blah blah blah😅
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
All children
"This case isn't over by a long shot!" - and won't be till sentences have been served.
Don't tread on me.🐍
The arrogance of this man.
You committed a crime, you are going to jail.
Crook
YOU LIVE UNDER THE RULE OF LAW MR. NAVARRO
I love the lady with the sign prison for Navarro. ❤❤❤❤❤❤.
prison for traitor
liar, liar, pants on fire!
The first "Revolution of Justice" will be televised in Atlanta. [written by an American]
This is straight out of Bob Altman's "Nashville"!
Its too complex to be understandable by people... At the end of the day, second guessing the law is not a good idea.
I want to talk...Mumble mumble keywords mumble mumble.
Lawyer: we have the right to keep it all secret. 😅
Face the facts u broke the law n got busted !!😮😮
Weird how everyone around Trump gets in trouble but not trump himself…
This puts the bolics intos Shambolic, like everything surrounding Trump.
They hold a phone like a nun with a switchy stick. Desperate to sceech for their right to speech in order to suppress his and ours to hear him.
Navarro ain’t getting out of this one!!!😁😁😁
Love the protestors! 👍🇺🇸💙
Love
You and tour fellows caused this division Among Americans
The 1st amendment is about the freedom of speech not the freedom to lie.
You can lie, it's not illegal
Invoke, confidential conversation, testify, sacrosanct, presumptive, defiant, variously,
👍
Lol
🙌🏽🙌🏽🙌🏽🥳🥳🥳
NOTHING BURGER
Who invited the entitled Karen with the banner! 😂
She didn’t need an invite to be where she’s standing. Just telling the truth
😂😂😂😂😂 Just like coming criminal. Always coming up with never rules.
Do any of Trumps team members know what Marxism is?
Banana Republic. Sorry for the US
More and more every day and there seems to be many who are blinkered to it.
I think we all have contempt at this stage.
1st ammendment rights disappearing , stay tuned to find out if we are already living in a communist state.
2024 Trump
Political.
not even close!
Errrrrr no... but his crimes were, what are you saying?
@@MsDebSteeves Yes it is and will remain so when people are selectively attacked for doing what everyone else is doing.
Ditzy Dingy Dodo.
Who is feeling pinched by inflation in audience’s asked in room of regular working people! Everyone’s hand went UP! Almost 99% of people working are having troubles paying bills, like rent to mortgages, Food to Utilities like water sewer trash! The shock is insurance from car, insurance health, life insurance and rental insurance to liability accidents for home to rental property! there is nothing that hasn’t gone up by double digits in the last three years since the pandemic started! From Israeli to USA the pain is felt Gov. is important to stop the crisis instead is fueling it…Soon The People will be rioting like In Lebanon if Gov. doesn’t Stop the companies Profiteering from this mess!
Trump and Brexit really messed up the script hey. The political elites and their friends in the legacy media will never let that happen again 😂
England is like garden of Eden after Brexit innit? I mean economy is booming, people are happy with lower costs of everything from food to mortgages right? And golden boy Boris, fabulous. Now go to closest beach and try to dip in ecoly flawoured benefits of Brexit to cool down a little bit mate.
Remember Afghanistan 🇦🇫 please 🇦🇫.
Sad, this guy just wants to speak, and morons in the background can't keep their disrespecting mouths shut. Very sad.
*This will be an important case to watch going forward.*
That's fine talking about a person that literally tried to silence democracy 🙄
Don't normalize what these Fascists have done to the U.S. They all need to be behind bars immediately!
Lock him up
BBC news 😂😂😂😂
I forgot. Americans are dumb collectively. Your post proves what everyone knows.
> BBC news
You managed to read the channel name. That's a step forward.
Wokedom of U.S.
Define wokeness
Imagine being above the age of 12 and still using terms like "woke."
Very dumb people use the term woke. Usually right wingers who are cultists.
Go back to bed sweetums 🍼
Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government
Judge says I'm banning your defence.
You keep repeating this all over the comment section and you’re still wrong.
Blanket claims of “executive privilege” are not an automatic win. The defense has to successfully argue where and why the privilege applies to withholding specific evidence. The court determines if the interest of executive privilege overrules the importance of turning over the evidence.
Navarro’s blanket executive privilege defense was insufficient, and the subpoena was not quashed. He had to appear and testify to Congress under oath per the subpoena. He could have exercised his 5th amendment rights and refused to answer appropriate questions, but he couldn’t be arsed to even show up in the first place.
Actions have consequences. Navarro spurned the legal system and is paying the appropriate price. Isn’t that what “law and order” is supposed to be?
@@sircrapalot9954 The defense has to successfully argue where and why the privilege applies to withholding specific evidence
====
Correct.
The judge however said you are not even allowed to argue or present that.
You've admitted he could use that as an argument. Quite reasonable.
However the judge wants a guilty verdict so says you can't.
What we have have is legal warfare where the swamp is trying to prevent Trump being elected, with the consequences to them.
@@sircrapalot9954 So why does the defence have to prove anything?
@@Nickle314 From a Politico article on Aug 30:
Navarro has long claimed that Trump asserted privilege to block him from appearing before the Jan. 6 select committee in early 2022 when the panel subpoenaed him. But Navarro has never produced direct evidence to back that claim and, more importantly, Trump and his attorneys have repeatedly declined to say whether Navarro was accurately reflecting their conversations.
Mehta cited Trump’s refusal to corroborate Navarro’s claims as the most compelling reason that he found Trump did not, in fact, seek to block Navarro’s testimony to the select committee.
“There was no formal invocation of executive privilege by [Trump] after personal consideration nor authorization to Mr. Navarro to invoke privilege on his behalf,” Mehta said.
TL;DR: Navarro’s defense invoking executive privilege didn’t hold water because he couldn’t provide evidence that his interactions were covered under the privilege, and the president’s own lawyers haven’t substantiated Navarro’s claim.
So he still had to show up in Congress to testify.
Actually if the court knows his job description they already know executive privilege was not applicable. Ergo his defense would be like this impromptu gossip sesh - a lot of wasted time on everyone’s parts.
Was the judge a Russian spy 😂
Biden fake president fake election
Il lake tarmpallwo pople gave trp fot voit Meena HD
Contempt of Congress is a virtue
A liar never ran out of lies..PETER NAVARRO..