Recycled Disney Animation Compilation #2
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 мар 2021
- Thank you everyone who suggested this video! Here's to Disney and there recycling history!
(Video Generator): youtube-to-mp3.org/
(Editing Software): www.videosoftdev.com/free-vide...
All clips are rightfully owned by Disney Inc., I DO NOT own anything! 
Кино
I pointed this out to my family when I was little and they didn't believe me!!
Try showing them this now
You've got a good eye
Did you show them this vid? I'm really curious and want to know what their reaction and thoughts are about it
Congrats you have achieved what you always desired for 🤣
great
Hats off to your keen observation and countless hours efforts.
He is indeed an insider
Disney: "No one's gonna know"
"They gonna know!"
My childhood conspiracy theory is proved! I don't know if I'm satisfied or devastated now...
Tell us your theory!
I just love the lion king clip so much. The 1994 has more expression in it when Mufasa clings onto the rocks whilst the 2016 one has this goofy fall. 1:54
Disney: recycles a scene
Fans: *Hey, I've seen this one!*
Disney: What do you mean, you've seen this? It's brand new
Fans: never mind. I like it...
It’s a re run. What’s a re run?.... uhhhh you’ll find out
Back to the Future reference.
@@pchound5962 yessir
Ayyy thats from Back to the future :D
The one with The Lion King and The Lion Guard, it doesn't look reused. It was just a reference.
But he didn’t die in the lion guard just fell into a hole
I don't know why, but something about Disney secrets always feels very uncomfortable to me.
I feel ya.
Yes me too
Because it ruins the illusion we had when we were kids and believed the Disney world is cute and innocent and perfect. And now we see that Disney is probably one of the nastiest, greediest and the most disrespectful to its fans company.
they're watching you.
@@rustywilliams2497 what do you mean by nasty and disrespectful?
An animation for almost a hundred years ago still looks amazing
Some of them
Almost 100 years? It’s only been like 70…
In their defense: it was just simpler to reuse footage. Animation can be taxing, and if they already had the footage, and it fit, why not reuse?
I feel like I'm the only one that loves that they did this. Watching them side by side was absolutely stunning.
I think it's actually cool tbh and i still would take this over Computer animated anyways
It also saves money
Actually it wasnt easier. Animators complained about the reusing.
The problem with reusing the animation is that they had to paint over the first animation and also make it fit with the diferent background, this ended up being harder than just making new animation.
@@danielcasco4124 That’s ridiculous. The hardest part about animating is the initial movements and composition, and filling in the frames. If they already have that to work over, that would make it much easier.
Snow White had pretty smooth animation for 1937. Then again, it was the first feature length animated film.
Disney wanted absolute perfection so it stayed in development for 4 years and only the best of the best animated it
its smooth because it was rotoscoped
rotoscope + talents that don't exist today
@@Spherigon Rotoscoping ≠ smooth.
Examples: Fleischer's Superman cartoons and Ralph Bakshi's The Lord of the Rings
@@Spherigon Most of Disney's works in the early days got their fair share of rotoscoping. Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland, basically any of Disney's works from the 50s were rotoscoped, but none look as spectacularly real as Snow White.
I kinda knew it in the back of my mind. But i didn't care. It's remains great one of a kind animation to me. Never gets old.
They just wanted you to have that "familiar" feeling...;)
Haha no it’s manipulation, to get ppl to come back to the product like oh that’s familiar and I like familiar because familiar is all around now
It's also a cost-saving method
@@titan133760 unacceptable for any kind of serious and honest artistic work, especially one that makes millions.
No, it’s so they can save money and the animators don’t do much work. People need to cut costs.
@@villalobosedwin1214 and also they re use animation so instead of animating stuff they already animated on they could animate something better and more grand
The scenes with Mowgli and Christopher Robin make total sense since they're both voiced by Bruce Reitherman.
"Can i copy your homework?"
"Yes, but just make it a little different so it doesn't look like you copied it"
The homework:
So this is why I get a nostalgic feeling when I watch one before the other
0:00 - 0:49 The guy in the comment of the first video was right! That IS a reused animation! My respect for noticing that!
it's really hard and takes a lot of times to make this back then. really appreciate their hard work to make children happy.
An example I noticed is the scene with the kids fighting in the schoolhouse in The Legend Of Sleepy Hollow was re-used in the Goofy cartoon Teachers Are People. And in another re-use of Sleepy Hollow animation, Sleeping Beauty took the scene of the horse charging toward the camera.
1:07 I like how these two have recycled scenes and numbers on the years are swapped 19 3 7 and 19 7 3
Whoever did this montage is such a genius!
Great work 👏🏽
E
Callao y ve hacer otro vídeo ocurrencia
Hola ocurrencia
Eres kaka 💩 ocurrencia
HOLA FRANCO!!
I must get this out before anyone draws conclusions (No pun intended):
Personally, I find this technique quite fascinating. This video is NOT meant to reflect the technique in a negative light. I DO NOT believe Disney was "lazy" or "unmotivated" during this time. Yes, they WERE struggling financially after (And even before) Walt passed away. So it's easy to assume that they needed to cut-down on budgets and time, but I don't necessarily think that's the case.
Wolfgang Reitherman. One of Disney's 'Nine Old Men', wanted to create something of a tradition. He purposefully acquired pre-animated cells from prior movies to add to newer works because HE believed it would result in a "higher quality product". When in reality, it proved to be much more painstaking than the original way of drawing NEW cells! Another one of Disney's 'Nine Old Men', Milt Kahl, did not share his feelings lightly:
"I detest the use of-it just breaks my heart to see animation from 'Snow White' used in 'The Rescuers'. It kills me, and it just embarrasses me to tears." - Milt Kahl.
The alligator in Princess and the frog has the same manurisms as Madam Mimm from Sword in the Stone in a few scenes (he even does the evil eyes and Hair pull but with a large wad of seaweed/vines)
I remember noticing this stuff when I watched these cartoons as a kid in the early 90s.
So this is why Disney had so many princesses.
The Many Adventures of Winnie The Pooh has a few examples of this within the same movie. Tigger pulling his checks apart is the same animation 3 sperate times, when he bounces out of scene i think they use the same animation 4 times, and the opening scene of Pooh chasing the Butterfly is used twice, I think the second time its a leaf and he's wearing a scarf.
That's because that movie is made up of three pre existing shorts that were released years apart from each other. The first one in 1966, second in 1968, and third in 1974. They all reuse a lot of animation from one another but since they came out apart from each other it was harder to notice. When they're all played one by one it's a lot easier to notice the reused assets. Christopher Robin hopping over the fence is probably reused like 3 times.
2:22
Seeing as Heffalumps and Woozles is very similar to Pink Elephants On Parade, I actually find it kind of clever that they recycled the animation on that one.
If you play the two songs at the same time they are synced so perfectly (both songs have vocals and than long periods of instrumentals the vocals of Heffalumps & Woozles will play while Pink Elephants On Parade Instrumental plays both songs switch places at the same time)
It terrified me as a kid, the Winnie the Pooh one
The jousting/horse animation from the Mother Goose short actually originated from the Headless Horseman scene from Ichabod and Mr. Toad (1949), and was also used for the climax scene in Sleeping Beauty
I saw every those Disney movie during my chilhood and I have no idea this happened. Great job, very intersting!
(Sorry for my english)
Ditto
Some of these feel more like inspirations more than straight reused. The one at the end is the one that feels that way the most.
Using everything frame by frame for a straight 30 sec to 1 min is legitly straight reused. Inspired means you use the same concept, not being lazy and just apply a 100% identical storyboard frame by frame for a scene.
@@vk69525 I agree, but the last example was definitely not a case of recycling, but rather similarity. None of the movements are the same, it's simply the subjact matter (frontal shot of a snake) that's so similar.
At the end it was showing recycled characters, I believe.
Thanks, now i know how to seperate background and animation because i watch this video over and over again
Awesome stuff dude
I enjoyed it
Ooh, it finally came out! Thank you for posting!
You’re welcome
Dude, not you, the person who posted this
some of these comparisons i watched both movies but i never noticed the similarities!!
Unfortunately it is something that they decided to start doing after Walt Disney died the movies after 1968 and a lot of the layouts a lot of the character animations and a lot of things that they reused and it took away from the uniqueness of these films and they stopped being the animated blockbusters that Walt Disney and his team had created unfortunately They didn't get that back until 1989 that is a 25 plus year gap
The example from 0:51 happened when he was still alive, though
@@Sakisasvictorianmask that's true, Disney was still around in 1951, so they can't blame Disney not being around anymore for copying scenes
Keep in mind these movies where animated entirely by hand. Using another other scenes base cell and redrawing over was as mutch a time saver as it was a cost saver.
I almost ran out breath while reading this 😆
Full stop.
Disney wasn't so well after he and his brother died financially
There is also a recycled animation with The Disney short Small One compared to Jungle Book where both main characters throw a stick and kick the ground.
I think Don Blueth also recycled some of the music from that one in Secrets of Nymph, parts of the music are almost exactly the same
Actually Small One has a *lot* of recycled footage in it. I noticed that last time I watched it a few months ago.
Out of all the Recycled Animation I've seen, the Jousting Knights are my most favorite. The Truth about Mother Goose (1957) and The Sword in the Stone (1963). I wish Disney would've made a full Movie about those Two Knights.😃
1:21 technically Snow White came out at 1938, but that’s accurate!
No, it came out in 1937.
@@brianhalljr.2637 While the film was first shown in 1937 to a special audience, it did release worldwide on February 4th, 1938. So, technically, you're both right.
I love the jazz music!.
Funny how the original fall screen in the lion king looks a lot more realistic in movement compared to the other one as the other one reminds me of those Chinese cat things
Wasn't Lion Guard flash-animated? That might be why.
Lion guard is boring
Even similar backgrounds, pretty interesting
Heffalumps and woozles terrified me as a kid and didn’t even realize what they were ripping off…
1:58 that run animation is also used on phillip and his horse when he fought maleficent(in her dragon form)
Remember when Disney cared and put heart into their films? They wanted to entertain people, not make money. Disney wasn't always evil.
I mean, sure, but that could be said for any other corporation out there. To your point though Disney is certainty amongst the largest of them.
I had kinda noticed a few of them but nevwr actually checked side by side. This is funny and kinda sad at the same time😅
it's so weird seeing a lot of scenes that I remembered, despite not seeing these movies in so long, being traces of other movies.
Honestly, fair. I can only imagine the amount of time that was saved by recycling old animation instead of going through all the hours, days, possibly months it would have taken for them back then to create a new animation cycle on top of all the new ones they had to do for the new movie. Probably would have been a lot longer to wait for new movies to come out.
I actually do not care that they reused it, all these movies wer egreat and still are. It just looks pretty cool to see that side by side comparsion, thx for the work.
i never ever noticed that until i watch this
As others have pointed out, Robin Hood can be described as the height of the Dark Age of Disney animation. It took from so many previous films.
As much as that's true, I must say that it had its own unique charm as well. Still, it's both fascinating and slightly eerie to see just how much had been pilfered.
Yet its still up there as great for me.. the voice acting is incredible
Disney: Illusion skill increased to legendary.
I didn’t even notice this with Dumbo and Winnie the Pooh
Awesome! Very similar nice catch! Thank you for sharing!😊👍
the trumpet good lord thats nice
Every frame of drawing need lots of time... recycled that great way of time saving.
Yep
I have no words.
"they're just kids, they won't know the difference."
But them kids grow up like me lol
Yess! So cool!
the glow up from 1977 to 1990 at 1:43 is amazing
I will say, though. Theykwere able to recontextualise it so well that I didn't even consider that is was reused.
Super cool find
I’m pretty sure it’s more just using the same reference footage than “recycling animation”, whatever that means. It was still drawn frame by frame, just like the original, hardly lazy.
seeing mowgli’s jungle reshaped into christopher robin’s hundred acre wood is a feat on its own
Key example of work smarter, not harder
Animation kicks ass!!
THATS WHY THE CHARACTERS ALL LOOK IDENTICAL
Ideas are a rare game in the forest of words.
Hell the snow white, robin hood and Aristocats bit I noticed at 5 years old
Might as well add the legend of sleepy hollow for the horse running towards the camera. Can't forget the horse run in Sleeping Beauty either.
Disney animators really recycling 20, 30, *40 years old* animated scenes.
2:43 That one is a bit of a stretch.
But it's amazing to see what's been recycled over many decades
Yeah, I always thought that was a deliberate reference.
Good work
The scene does the same thing as the other movies.
It's like the looking glass self
Don't forget The Sword in The Stone when Arthur (aka. Wart) breaks a branch while stepping on it, which was patterned after a shot of Hayley Mills in Pollyanna.
Wow, it’s so interesting
once you know they just don't fit anymore, do they?
The mufasa scene made me spit my water out
Well I'll go to our house! Can't believe this!
This is interesting knowledge to see and know.
EVEN IN THE LION GUARD!!!!!! wow
This is actually harder to do. And it means the animation they are copying is considered perfect
For me,every Disney Animation movie have a prototype for something like that.
Disney sure knows how to Recycle it’s own resources
The year I was born 1977 - Raylene Price
in this 1:33-2:09 was stephen hillenburg's vocals that was muted off
I still wonder what the process was to reuse the animations. They didn't necessarily have CG back then but it feels like they have a skeleton and all they'd have to do is replace the models and everything would follow suit.
0:50 I actually noticed that too about a month or so ago.
Zowl: La verdadera razón detrás de las escenas recicladas de Disney
Funny fact about this Animation process is what it was more time consuming then doing it from scretch, stated by the animators.
see my commentary.
Lion gaurd was a low budget version lol
Pinoccho is my fav movie in disney ;)
My whole childhood is a literal lie 👁👄👁
Better than reused story
OH GOD I LOVE THE HEFFALUMPS BUT HATE THE PINK ELEPHANTS AND THERES A FRIKIN CONNECTION OH GOD
1:19 the alternate of 1937 which is 1973
1937
1973
I love it
0:50 Can we take a moment to appreciate how much better the animation from Bambi looked when compared to Alice in Wonderland, which came nearly a decade later.
Oh, my! True! 💜
So that’s why all Disney movies feel the same
There is one recycled scene I haven’t seen yet. It’s the one where Figaro from Pinocchio shimmies into his bed is recycled into The Aristocats where Berlioz does the same thing
Gotcha covered! Timestamp 1:02
ruclips.net/video/pCndxoYaJHk/видео.html