After watching the video with you texts between her and her mother, I find something isn't right...I think her mother helped her deliver the baby and helped her cover it up... Go back to the interragation with the parents and u see them act like they knew nothing about the birth control pills but the mother was the one making the appointments telling her to exercise and take the pills so she did not get pregnant at the prom, then giving her dulcolax... Something isn't right... The mother is guilty as well I think, IDK....
cclynn c That texting between Skylar and her mom is an important piece of evidence. Is it a coincidence that Skylar did not see a gynecologist until April 26 or that the decision was made to get birth control at that time. Maybe mom realized it was close to the due date and now birth control would be needed soon. Went back for birth control 10 weeks after the birth ( hoping the nurse and doctor wouldn't be so smart as to remember the April conversations). If she had got out of the doctor's office unscaved on that July visit we possibly would not be here today. Mom's anger,(IMO), came from getting caught. (Just my thoughts, don't beat me up too bad for them)
I think her brother helped! He was very close to her room ! Plus when dad took the stand he was kinda vague when asked if he thought his son heard her in labour ..( not wanting to lie or tell )
So prosecution rests? If this is all of their evidence how could anybody convict on this?What this girl did is wrong but there is no solid proof that baby was alive? I kept waiting for an aha moment... I thought for sure the prosecutor would have some sort of evidence that this baby was alive... I mean we can all assume all day long that she's guilty but can it really be proven? I say no...
I actually didn't watch today's testimonyI'm getting ready to watch it but what I had seen so far before today I just didn't see proof that the baby was aliveI mean trust me I do believe that she's completely wrong here but at the same time where is the proof maybe today's testimony or change my mind I haven't watched it yet I'm not going to lie
@@justbrandy8520 They jumped the gun and overcharged this case because they were going on the presumption she burned the baby. Then they didn't want to admit they were wrong and procede to claim that she could have still burned the baby's skin?! Ridiculous!! She didn't murder that baby. Just made a terrible decision
@@DandyBeingTandi I agree 100%I thought for sure at any moment the prosecution was going to show me something that this baby taken a breath...never once did they show me anything that convinced me that baby was alive I'm eager to see the defense witnesses... Honestly watching these interviews I am more convinced than ever that she did not do this
Say what you want, I find it quite convenient that such an unwanted pregnancy and baby would produce a stillborn. No attempt to assist the baby in ANY way. The baby wasn't even worth a family discussion. All the baby got from this, is a hole in the backyard. Twelve people will decide this, but a terrible interrogation makes NOT an innocent party. Facts determine that, and for me, the defendant's version of facts are far too convenient for the ultimate outcome she wanted and created, which was a flat belly and no baby.
L.DOT.M. That mother was the cause of all this. My God....who tells their teen to overuse laxatives. Jesus she needs to be on trial for abusing her daughter.
SMH I could not believe those text messages that the mother sent her daughter. You rock and you’re going to be the boss with all that weight loss saying weight loss in several different texts.”you will be Brandon’s HOT GF”
Hum....experienced and well paid attorney released his client without getting permission from the judge? Should be an interesting start of the day tomorrow, if we are allowed to see it.
They’re trying to despute her confessions are all LieutenantFeins fault. Trying to say that his interrogation technique was leading and very passive aggressive .
At first she stated the baby was dead. After they completely bungled the investigation by making her confess to something that is on record as never happening, they cohersed her into saying the baby was alive. If you listen they tell her over and over that what she is telling them is a lie, bc they “know” the truth. They then tell her their version of the truth (which has been refuted) and tell her that if she wants to go home and wants the baby to come home so they can give her a proper burial she has to admit to THEIR truth. Which she does bc she thinks they are going to release her and the baby if she tells them what they want to hear. This is the parents fault for sending her in there with no lawyer!!!
You mean the investigators lead confession? That poor girl did not admit to a live child till after they beat her over the head with it during the 2nd interview. State has zero proof.
If I was prosecutor i'd research if the defendant was tanning for prom after the fact she was informed she was pregnant and taking laxatives to cause miscarriage. I would show everything she could do to kill her baby before and after birth. I believe her mom was aware the whole time and helped her
I cannot believe the State has rested! There are more questions to be asked for sure. As far as "Princess" goes...you cannot tell me she had no clue she was pregnant. She didn't want the baby in the first place and didn't care that it died. The only time she showed any emotion was when she was being questioned by the police and all she was concerned with was if she was going to get to go home. As far as cause of death...the poor little baby was so decomposed there was nothing left to show cause. I believe she did cause her death!
JoanneLG1960 YES!!! I have a friend who was 34 weeks pregnant with her THIRD before she found out she was even pregnant. She even works in the medical field and had no clue she was pregnant!
@@AlinaSween what facts do you have the shows she DIDN'T KILL THE BABY?!! There certainly is a ton of evidence that she didn't want the BABY! Then she gives birth and burys it?! Yea...sounds like an innocent person to me..
Michael S That doesn’t matter in the court of law. It’s the states job to show without a reasonable doubt that she did the crime she is accused of doing. In this case this was not done. Skylar is guilty of many things murder is not one of them. Bottom line here is the state has not proven its case.
Emilie Gilbert at 14:00 in they clearly state why LEGALLY she cannot be charged with tampering of evidence. The stillborn baby was not evidence at the time. By all legal definitions. That’s why it’s thrown out.
The more I read comments in “THIS CASE” the more I realize just how ignorant the world really is...She told the truth in the first interview with the police...She’s just a child herself...The police were wrong for doing what they did to her...Some of y’all need to learn how to put yourself in another persons shoes and realize “What would you do, in the same situation, with the same type parents?” But you can’t because you’re to busy passing judgment on others...Get a clue!!!
Linda Von Haugg When she realized the baby was not alive, with her young mind, she thought that was the next step...She may not have wanted a child, a lot of women don’t, until they hold it in their arms...So imagine, she was scared, nobody knew, she thought that was the next step...She wouldn’t have put flowers over top of that baby unless she cared...That alone shows she loved her instantly...She wouldn’t even have thought of flowers except to her, that’s what you do when someone you love dies...You have to think with a child’s mind, not an adult...She was a worldly girl!!
I can absolutely put myself in her shoes because I was in a very similar situation 35 years ago. I am passing judgement on her because I've been there. I got pregnant 3 months after I graduated high school and knew for sure I had to be pregnant 3-4 months into it. I didn't go to a doctor until I was 8 months and then HAD to tell my parents. They were furious!! But, I did the right thing..."Little Princess" decided her looks were more important! She wasn't unhappy at all that the poor baby died and she put the pot of flowers on top of the so-called grave to cover it up! I do not believe that baby was stillborn!
I think Skylar needs mercy ...but in no way should she be able to walk away from this freely . She needs some strong support and therapy. Why she was so compelled to conceal her baby is truly because of the environment she was raised in...but she still has her own freewill. She still needs to be accountable in some way and she will. It's up to God in the end.
In all seriousness of the case. As almost every case I have watch lately are all almost all circumstantial evidence , Now from my time and generation you needed facts not a story to made up and if believable it must be fact. Where am I wrong be here? It's not fair concerning our individual Rights. Please come on now xx What is going wrong with our entire system.
I also remember a time when if there was only circumstantial evidence, the defense would simply decline to put on a case, and still get an acquittal. I guess it all changed in the 70s, when people were indoctrinated with the belief that justice equals a guilty verdict. Particularly troubling is also the sensationalism surrounding female defendants. I mean, how could the judge decline a change of venue in the face of this publicity?
I could argue ,before the dawn of dna which is the ace of hard evidence ,most cases were tried with mostly circumstantial evidence ,convicted wrongly and set free from dna ! In my opinion having a case purely circumstantial in this day of technology re: text message ,pictures etc. Would hold more weight than say an eye witnesses ( not in this particular case ) as it tell a very compelling " story" relationship between mother and daughter ! The defendant here in my opinion has shown total disregard for the life growing inside her ! She took birth control to make the illusion of not being pregnant ! I do however feel this defendant although guilty of causing the death of her baby regardless if it was born stillborn ! In a society of today we dont have women bury stillborn babies ! Once a fetus is past 26ish weeks its presumed a mother does everything to have a thriving baby to raise or give up for adoption ! Even drug addicts usually show up at a hospital to born their babies ! I believe this girl was very cunning in her behavior by hiding this pregnancy which led to the demise of infant ! However she definently has mitigating circumstances such as a poor role model and previous body image, eating disorder mental illness .I dont think she needs to go to prison but she needs to be held accountable!
Donna Cox the defendant has to know there was an investigation ongoing for it to be considered tampering with evidence. They discuss this at around the 14:00 mark. There was technically no tampering bc it wasn’t known to Skylar that there would be an investigation and the investigation had not started yet.
I am very surprised no one asked Skylar what her plan was for her baby. One would assume that she was expecting to deliver a live healthy baby. The baby was healthy at her one and only prenatal visit two weeks before the birth. She had no reason to think the baby would be stillborn. WHAT WAS HER PLAN?
it may be discovered that an abnormality or an infection led to the stillbirth. However, in most cases it’s because of something that happened during labour or birth. A problem with the placenta or umbilical cord, such as a knot in the cord, may mean the baby did not have enough oxygen.
Ok I am not saying I agree or that she is guilty or innocent but how did the doctor know if she went to another practice and another doctor. We know this to not be true but at the time it could have happened. She could have secretly delivered a baby and gave it to someone. She didnt have to ever tell anyone what actually happened she didn't have to say anything.
The teeanager said that the baby was crying. So the baby was alive. Did the umbilical cord killed the baby after? So what's the percentage of babies being killed by umbilical cord, is it rare? Did the baby die because of the abnormal labor, no doctor, no assistance, no nothing. Or she just killed the baby to get rid of it. So it looks like this case is not behond doubts, then she won't go to jail. If she did not kill, and the baby died naturally, why she could not call the parents or somebody else. I don't if she buried the baby to destroy the evidences, or if she was terrified, afraid and ashamed of the parents. It's a fact, she tampered the evidences that's what will get her in trouble.
@@pakaza No the detective implied that...The full term fetus was measuring at only 32 weeks, that's failure to thrive! The M.E. can't say it wasn't a stillbirth! Why are so many throwing this very naive teen under the bus with no evidence? The umbilical cord is the lifeline for a baby and this one was born without it, you evidently have never had a baby or even know how gestation works! The placenta wasn't delivered until the next day so how did she manage burying the baby as she did not cut the cord? Also google "Reid Technique" that the detective's used on Skylar
@@JoanneLG1960- Hi, I worked in a DR for 4 years. I also spent the majority of my career working in neonatal ICU's. I've given birth x2. Skyler had a fundal height of 32cm.. however this measurement is a screening tool in this case. Towards the end of pregnancy during cephalic presentation, the baby's head becomes "engaged" or dropped further into the pelvis thus the fundal hight would be considerably less, when this baby was much further along in gestational age.
@@JoanneLG1960 No,, there is another video where it says she said the baby was crying, I think it's the video where the parents are talking to her in the police torture room. I am just the messenger. LOL.
Yah but they don't smash their skulls in and bury them in the backyard then send texts saying how freakn happy they are the day they killed their child
Emilie Gilbert in an interview that has been proven to be coerced. I don’t believe anything she said in the second interview bc they put words in her mouth ever time. They told her basically “tell us you did this and we will let you go and give you her remains.”
I think the dad should get in trouble she said she didn’t wanna get pregnant I think that she was with another boy and the dad was having we. With her NOT GUILTY
After watching the video with you texts between her and her mother, I find something isn't right...I think her mother helped her deliver the baby and helped her cover it up... Go back to the interragation with the parents and u see them act like they knew nothing about the birth control pills but the mother was the one making the appointments telling her to exercise and take the pills so she did not get pregnant at the prom, then giving her dulcolax... Something isn't right... The mother is guilty as well I think, IDK....
cclynn c That texting between Skylar and her mom is an important piece of evidence. Is it a coincidence that Skylar did not see a gynecologist until April 26 or that the decision was made to get birth control at that time. Maybe mom realized it was close to the due date and now birth control would be needed soon. Went back for birth control 10 weeks after the birth ( hoping the nurse and doctor wouldn't be so smart as to remember the April conversations). If she had got out of the doctor's office unscaved on that July visit we possibly would not be here today. Mom's anger,(IMO), came from getting caught. (Just my thoughts, don't beat me up too bad for them)
I think her brother helped! He was very close to her room ! Plus when dad took the stand he was kinda vague when asked if he thought his son heard her in labour ..( not wanting to lie or tell )
I’m not sure if her mother helped with the crime, but, I believe her mother knew and her father was getting suspicious...
@@ceecee333 when did the dad take the stand? I missed that...
@@k-yk-y5044 yesterday
So prosecution rests? If this is all of their evidence how could anybody convict on this?What this girl did is wrong but there is no solid proof that baby was alive? I kept waiting for an aha moment... I thought for sure the prosecutor would have some sort of evidence that this baby was alive... I mean we can all assume all day long that she's guilty but can it really be proven? I say no...
I actually didn't watch today's testimonyI'm getting ready to watch it but what I had seen so far before today I just didn't see proof that the baby was aliveI mean trust me I do believe that she's completely wrong here but at the same time where is the proof maybe today's testimony or change my mind I haven't watched it yet I'm not going to lie
I agree. There is no case here. It's a disgrace this non-case has gone this far.
@@ChuckRosseel absolutely agree!!
@@justbrandy8520 They jumped the gun and overcharged this case because they were going on the presumption she burned the baby. Then they didn't want to admit they were wrong and procede to claim that she could have still burned the baby's skin?! Ridiculous!! She didn't murder that baby. Just made a terrible decision
@@DandyBeingTandi I agree 100%I thought for sure at any moment the prosecution was going to show me something that this baby taken a breath...never once did they show me anything that convinced me that baby was alive I'm eager to see the defense witnesses... Honestly watching these interviews I am more convinced than ever that she did not do this
Say what you want, I find it quite convenient that such an unwanted pregnancy and baby would produce a stillborn. No attempt to assist the baby in ANY way. The baby wasn't even worth a family discussion. All the baby got from this, is a hole in the backyard. Twelve people will decide this, but a terrible interrogation makes NOT an innocent party. Facts determine that, and for me, the defendant's version of facts are far too convenient for the ultimate outcome she wanted and created, which was a flat belly and no baby.
Please show me the “facts” that this baby was ever alive..
It’s a good thing that the Justice system tends to use real facts vs your gut feelings.
LEGALLY IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.
That household sure was dysfunctional.
L.DOT.M. That mother was the cause of all this. My God....who tells their teen to overuse laxatives. Jesus she needs to be on trial for abusing her daughter.
They’re gonna get a reality show after this if she gets off.
SMH I could not believe those text messages that the mother sent her daughter.
You rock and you’re going to be the boss with all that weight loss saying weight loss in several different texts.”you will be Brandon’s HOT GF”
@@nursingismybag525
I have been looking at them and they are extremely childish too.
Without a don’t! I think the mother was more concerned with her reputation then her child’s wellbeing!
Hum....experienced and well paid attorney released his client without getting permission from the judge? Should be an interesting start of the day tomorrow, if we are allowed to see it.
Everyone keeps saying wheres the proof that the baby was born alive. Is her admitting that in the interrogation room not enough proof?
They’re trying to despute her confessions are all LieutenantFeins fault.
Trying to say that his interrogation technique was leading and very passive aggressive .
At first she stated the baby was dead. After they completely bungled the investigation by making her confess to something that is on record as never happening, they cohersed her into saying the baby was alive. If you listen they tell her over and over that what she is telling them is a lie, bc they “know” the truth. They then tell her their version of the truth (which has been refuted) and tell her that if she wants to go home and wants the baby to come home so they can give her a proper burial she has to admit to THEIR truth. Which she does bc she thinks they are going to release her and the baby if she tells them what they want to hear. This is the parents fault for sending her in there with no lawyer!!!
You mean the investigators lead confession? That poor girl did not admit to a live child till after they beat her over the head with it during the 2nd interview. State has zero proof.
If I was prosecutor i'd research if the defendant was tanning for prom after the fact she was informed she was pregnant and taking laxatives to cause miscarriage. I would show everything she could do to kill her baby before and after birth. I believe her mom was aware the whole time and helped her
Forget the laxatives, I want to know if Skylar took RU-486, it's available online.
Wasn't she taking birth control?
Laxatives do not cause abortions. I was told to take laxatives by my obgyn during both of my pregnancies.
Tanning also does not cause abortions and where is their proof she was tanning? Ever heard of a spray tan?
Don’t you think the state would have brought up the tanning and laxatives if it cause harm to the baby. Y’all are ridiculous. Reaching...
I cannot believe the State has rested! There are more questions to be asked for sure. As far as "Princess" goes...you cannot tell me she had no clue she was pregnant. She didn't want the baby in the first place and didn't care that it died. The only time she showed any emotion was when she was being questioned by the police and all she was concerned with was if she was going to get to go home. As far as cause of death...the poor little baby was so decomposed there was nothing left to show cause. I believe she did cause her death!
Do you remember the A&E show "I Didn't Know I Was Pregnant"? There were women on that show who were in their 2nd pregnancy and didn't know!!!
JoanneLG1960 YES!!! I have a friend who was 34 weeks pregnant with her THIRD before she found out she was even pregnant. She even works in the medical field and had no clue she was pregnant!
No one cares what you believe. What facts do you have that she killed the baby... NONE.
@@AlinaSween what facts do you have the shows she DIDN'T KILL THE BABY?!! There certainly is a ton of evidence that she didn't want the BABY! Then she gives birth and burys it?! Yea...sounds like an innocent person to me..
Michael S That doesn’t matter in the court of law. It’s the states job to show without a reasonable doubt that she did the crime she is accused of doing. In this case this was not done. Skylar is guilty of many things murder is not one of them. Bottom line here is the state has not proven its case.
This is absolutely facinating. I wonder why we don't get to see this post jury action in other trials?
This channel tends to post these types of hearings, held outside the jury's presence. They're some of my favorite parts of trials.
Come on judge!! How does the tampering with evidence charge get thrown out when that is obviously clear?! You can tell which side he is taking 😒😒
She HID the baby how much more did he need
Where did she tamper with evidence?
@@MrsMrMoney a corpse for 1!
Emilie Gilbert at 14:00 in they clearly state why LEGALLY she cannot be charged with tampering of evidence. The stillborn baby was not evidence at the time. By all legal definitions. That’s why it’s thrown out.
@@MrsMrMoney what about the deleted messages? Or skylar having the boyfriend come help her clean up and move her bed over where the blood had been?
The more I read comments in “THIS CASE” the more I realize just how ignorant the world really is...She told the truth in the first interview with the police...She’s just a child herself...The police were wrong for doing what they did to her...Some of y’all need to learn how to put yourself in another persons shoes and realize “What would you do, in the same situation, with the same type parents?” But you can’t because you’re to busy passing judgment on others...Get a clue!!!
Kristie Satterwhite I totally agree
Linda Von Haugg When she realized the baby was not alive, with her young mind, she thought that was the next step...She may not have wanted a child, a lot of women don’t, until they hold it in their arms...So imagine, she was scared, nobody knew, she thought that was the next step...She wouldn’t have put flowers over top of that baby unless she cared...That alone shows she loved her instantly...She wouldn’t even have thought of flowers except to her, that’s what you do when someone you love dies...You have to think with a child’s mind, not an adult...She was a worldly girl!!
Kristie Satterwhite .. totally agree
I can absolutely put myself in her shoes because I was in a very similar situation 35 years ago. I am passing judgement on her because I've been there. I got pregnant 3 months after I graduated high school and knew for sure I had to be pregnant 3-4 months into it. I didn't go to a doctor until I was 8 months and then HAD to tell my parents. They were furious!! But, I did the right thing..."Little Princess" decided her looks were more important! She wasn't unhappy at all that the poor baby died and she put the pot of flowers on top of the so-called grave to cover it up! I do not believe that baby was stillborn!
I think Skylar needs mercy ...but in no way should she be able to walk away from this freely . She needs some strong support and therapy. Why she was so compelled to conceal her baby is truly because of the environment she was raised in...but she still has her own freewill. She still needs to be accountable in some way and she will. It's up to God in the end.
I’m frankly surprised that the judge didn’t throw out the case. However, it is always better to err on giving it to the jury to decide.
teambeining why he dismiss it. She buried her poor baby
I’m surprised too.
Yep it should have never made it this far. What a waste of taxpayers money.
In all seriousness of the case. As almost every case I have watch lately are all almost all circumstantial evidence , Now from my time and generation you needed facts not a story to made up and if believable it must be fact. Where am I wrong be here? It's not fair concerning our individual Rights. Please come on now xx What is going wrong with our entire system.
I also remember a time when if there was only circumstantial evidence, the defense would simply decline to put on a case, and still get an acquittal. I guess it all changed in the 70s, when people were indoctrinated with the belief that justice equals a guilty verdict.
Particularly troubling is also the sensationalism surrounding female defendants. I mean, how could the judge decline a change of venue in the face of this publicity?
I could argue ,before the dawn of dna which is the ace of hard evidence ,most cases were tried with mostly circumstantial evidence ,convicted wrongly and set free from dna ! In my opinion having a case purely circumstantial in this day of technology re: text message ,pictures etc. Would hold more weight than say an eye witnesses ( not in this particular case ) as it tell a very compelling " story" relationship between mother and daughter ! The defendant here in my opinion has shown total disregard for the life growing inside her ! She took birth control to make the illusion of not being pregnant ! I do however feel this defendant although guilty of causing the death of her baby regardless if it was born stillborn ! In a society of today we dont have women bury stillborn babies ! Once a fetus is past 26ish weeks its presumed a mother does everything to have a thriving baby to raise or give up for adoption ! Even drug addicts usually show up at a hospital to born their babies ! I believe this girl was very cunning in her behavior by hiding this pregnancy which led to the demise of infant ! However she definently has mitigating circumstances such as a poor role model and previous body image, eating disorder mental illness .I dont think she needs to go to prison but she needs to be held accountable!
Even DNA is circumstantial.
@@Thebeautiful11 yes but it can be direct ,when other evidence is provided with it ..
Wow, really surprised the Judge dismissed the tampering charge just like that.. how can you call burning and burying a body not tampering ????
Even the state's medical experts said there was zero evidence the baby was burned.
Donna Cox the defendant has to know there was an investigation ongoing for it to be considered tampering with evidence. They discuss this at around the 14:00 mark. There was technically no tampering bc it wasn’t known to Skylar that there would be an investigation and the investigation had not started yet.
Is there court today in this trial?
Wow comments are so diverse on this trial. I'm on the fence till all evidence is in.
There is no evidence of murder from the medical examiner
Keep waiting bc the state has rested so...
I am very surprised no one asked Skylar what her plan was for her baby. One would assume that she was expecting to deliver a live healthy baby. The baby was healthy at her one and only prenatal visit two weeks before the birth. She had no reason to think the baby would be stillborn. WHAT WAS HER PLAN?
Diana Mulroney yes.
Law and Crime why can’t you number these videos for continuity?
THANK YOU
Who the hell is doing the clicking AGAIN??? WHAT do we have to listen to.. damn😠
Do you have misophonia, OP? I do, and clicking is one of the worst sounds.
Does anyone know if Skylar was offered a plea deal?
She absolutely tampered with evidence in burying the baby.
it may be discovered that an abnormality or an infection led to the stillbirth. However, in most cases it’s because of something that happened during labour or birth. A problem with the placenta or umbilical cord, such as a knot in the cord, may mean the baby did not have enough oxygen.
ummm... was the first law enforcement witness allowed not to be on camera??
Ok I am not saying I agree or that she is guilty or innocent but how did the doctor know if she went to another practice and another doctor. We know this to not be true but at the time it could have happened. She could have secretly delivered a baby and gave it to someone. She didnt have to ever tell anyone what actually happened she didn't have to say anything.
She didn't go to a different practice. She went to two different doctors, Dr Andrew & Dr. Boyce, both at Hilltop OBGYN.
The teeanager said that the baby was crying. So the baby was alive. Did the umbilical cord killed the baby after? So what's the percentage of babies being killed by umbilical cord, is it rare? Did the baby die because of the abnormal labor, no doctor, no assistance, no nothing. Or she just killed the baby to get rid of it. So it looks like this case is not behond doubts, then she won't go to jail. If she did not kill, and the baby died naturally, why she could not call the parents or somebody else. I don't if she buried the baby to destroy the evidences, or if she was terrified, afraid and ashamed of the parents. It's a fact, she tampered the evidences that's what will get her in trouble.
She NEVER said the baby was crying! Your just like the prosecution making stuff up to back your narrative!!!
@@JoanneLG1960 She said the baby "gurged." A dead baby does not gurgle.
@@pakaza
No the detective implied that...The full term fetus was measuring at only 32 weeks, that's failure to thrive! The M.E. can't say it wasn't a stillbirth! Why are so many throwing this very naive teen under the bus with no evidence? The umbilical cord is the lifeline for a baby and this one was born without it, you evidently have never had a baby or even know how gestation works! The placenta wasn't delivered until the next day so how did she manage burying the baby as she did not cut the cord? Also google "Reid Technique" that the detective's used on Skylar
@@JoanneLG1960- Hi, I worked in a DR for 4 years. I also spent the majority of my career working in neonatal ICU's. I've given birth x2. Skyler had a fundal height of 32cm.. however this measurement is a screening tool in this case. Towards the end of pregnancy during cephalic presentation, the baby's head becomes "engaged" or dropped further into the pelvis thus the fundal hight would be considerably less, when this baby was much further along in gestational age.
@@JoanneLG1960 No,, there is another video where it says she said the baby was crying, I think it's the video where the parents are talking to her in the police torture room. I am just the messenger. LOL.
Omg!! She knew from the start that she was not going to let this baby live! No matter what she had to do!
Where is the cross of the prom boyfriend by the defense?
Jacquelyn Goad I believe the defense chose not to cross.
What could they possibly ask him thst would benefit their murdering client.. Wonder if he dumped her murdering ass
did the biological dad have to testify
@@JMac-27 Yes, Trey testified toward the beginning.
If you watched the trial, you'll see that the defense-- after a brief discussion-- opted not to cross-examine Brandon.
I like this judge
My fear, if she is found not guilty.. reality show. 🤦♂️
Does anyone think Skylar is gonna testify?
nope.
No
No way in hell
I would think she would...I think the jury would want to hear from her.
She would be crazy to do so. Not a good idea.
Amish women have babies all the time not in a hospital or with a doctor following their pregnancy
Yah but they don't smash their skulls in and bury them in the backyard then send texts saying how freakn happy they are the day they killed their child
@@monicavictoriagirl5262 I didn't hear testimony where she smashed the baby's skull in
@@monicavictoriagirl5262 wtf
I pray she is found guilty! 😣😣😷
Emilie Gilbert no way. No proof the baby was ever alive.
In what world?
@@MrsMrMoney she even said the baby was alive for 5 mins. No stillborn is going to "gurgle" or move its arms.
Emilie Gilbert in an interview that has been proven to be coerced. I don’t believe anything she said in the second interview bc they put words in her mouth ever time. They told her basically “tell us you did this and we will let you go and give you her remains.”
Lawyers seem soulless.
I Love this Defence team !!!!!
Is this anew defense atty? Don't see old fart. The new guy is almost as handsome as the original one
Dead baby and that's whats going through your mind?
Donna not the white headed one (dad). Now I see 2 younger defense guys
All three have been present throughout the whole trial. Two of them are father and son.
Such a travesty!
I think the dad should get in trouble she said she didn’t wanna get pregnant I think that she was with another boy and the dad was having we. With her
NOT GUILTY
Micah Vandeventer pay attention. The paternity of this baby was establish via DNA.
Poor judge is seriously gofer throated.
👊😂🤦