His opening is called... *well... I know it as what's called a "net & trident"... People who have been taught all those fancy styles like Gambit & Australian & fancy named openings or endgames... Those people don't use the terms I grew up with, nor do we use chess pieces in the same play style... Similar, yes... samesies, no... Still a blast playin' tho??? YES......
Crazy Mag... if I didn't know better, I'd say he was using what's called... awell, I grew up calling this style of chess game play: "G-Style", game play... I'm honored of he really is using "G-Style"... hopefully it's intentionally, if unintentionally, im still honored... -u most likely won't hear that style from anybody else... I'm 1 of the last that was taught to use it... idk why I'm sharing this but I've mentioned this style on other chess vids so wtheck... 🤷♂️why not, rt 🙌👏🤝 🫵Mag... heck of a game... 🫵 commentator dude, good play by play...
This is more like "Old Wine in a New Bottle." The move ...Na6 has been played before in analogous positions, though perhaps not in exactly the position in this game. GM John Speelman, in his monograph "New Ideas in the Caro-Kann (1992 MacMillan Chess Library) notes that Keith Arkell employed ...Na6 out of an Advance Caro-Kann against John Nunn in London 1990, using it in similar fashion as Magnus: 1) e4 c6 2) d4 d5 3) e5 Na6 4) c3 Nc7 5) Ne2 g6 6) Ng3 Nh6 7) Nd2 Bg4 8) f3 Bd7 9) f4 Ne6 10) Nf3 Ng7 11) h3 Nhf5 - but leaving out the move ...h7-h5 that is characteristic of the Gurgenidze System. GM Vlastimil Hort, in the chapter on the Gurgenodze from his book "The Modern Defence" from 1979 (RHM Press) mentions his own game Padevski-Hort from Varna 1967 in his notes to the well-known Fischer-Petrosian game from Belgrade 1970. Hort played as black: 1) d4 g6 2) e4 c6 3) f4 d5 -saving a tempo compared to Magnus- 4) e5 Na6!? 5) Nf3 h5 6) Nbd2 Nc7 &) Bd3 Nh6. Hort did not bring his knight to g7 via e6 and Padevski chose to develop his knight to d2 instead of Firouzja's Nc3.
I think Bobby Fisher would be very pleased to see this type of play. Throwing opening theory out the window and just forcing a game of pure chess. Beautiful.
Why use clickbait by calling this well-known variation (Rat Defence, Accelerated Gurgenidze) a new opening invention? Magnus himself has played 5...h5 at least 3 times previously and the first potential novelty in the game is ...Na6 (in previous games reaching this position black had tried ...b6, drawing (Renner-Hickl 1993) and ...e6, winning (Pacey-Hergott 2002). This is not the way to win loyal viewers to your channel.
That’s how to become successful at RUclips and has been for years. Do you not know this by now? Don’t worry about titles worry about content and this was great content. Chill and accept that titles need to be clickbait to be seen. Deep breaths you’re going to be ok.
@@FizzyElff I already marked this channel to YT not to recommend me any further videos. This is how to deal with clickbait. If more users used this option, the clickbait would quickly disappear.
I respectfully disagree with your loaded statement brother!! The idea of d6 g6 c6 then h5-h4 is super rare, and the queens knight path to a6 and then eventually g7 is a fundamental part of the opening as played by Magnus in this game. You admitted na6 was a novelty, further confirming the collective opening idea played by Magnus is new, novel, and yes more shocking than Jim Carrey exiting the rhino! Hans Niemann might even say the video’s performance speaks for itself 😉
@@drmikechess 9...Na6 is a novelty in the relatively small database I have access to but there are many more games showing the basic concept of this opening, including the ...h5-h4 advance. As an example featuring Magnus' opponent, if black chooses 9...Bh6 instead of 9...Na6, the game transposes to Firouzja-Nihal Sarin 2024. It should not be too difficult for experienced players to get from this game, played just a month ago, to potential prep in this variation.
I don't know what is calculating the computer score, but QC4 at 11:23 is a colossal blunder on the computer score, and it isn't even commented in the audio. And there's another Q move at 12:01 where white's score plummets from a decisive lead back to 50-50. I guess it's consistently hard to find the most precise open-board queen moves in an unorthodox structure at Blitz. Magnus is playing the clock hard, here. To judge by the computer score, on a standard time control, he's often trailing the play by a big margin. But only if his opponent finds the most precise queen move on an open board under tight time controls. Update: RF7 takes pawn throws the game away on the computer eval at 12:14. Magnus effectively wins on a massive blunder right here.
One of the many things you can't criticize Magnus for is how many ideas he has! Give him a complex position, I think he'd find more ideas than any other player. They just seem to flow from him - which we can see particularly in speed chess.
(2:55) i think Mag is gonna pretend a switch sides for board control (the net)... He's gonna end up controlling 3 columns/Letters "F&G"... I'll guess "DorH" -show attack weak side, slice a sliver off the strong... ending in a +2 piece for Mag with threat to King & 2 other pieces... (before using "rook with queen" & 2 pawns with a knight)
Ill be... dangit... Magnus did use a "net & trident" (trident: 3 point spear) *i mentioned this previously... -I believe i also mentioned just about everything he's doing up till now (12:05)... -I did mismention +2 (oops, ment -2) & a few minor details incorrect... -controls F&G, then B & ends up winning with checkmate on H... using Queen & Rook... Holy heck, i called this 1... no edited comments & hopefully time stamps for my posts align with game play... within reasonable time span... I'll pat myself on my back...
Back in the days, Magnus Carlsen bought everything from Garri Kasparov opnigns move about 10000 of them, I don't think Carlsen has used any of them yet ;)
Carlsen is a quick thinker so it is a good strategy for him to make unexpected moves that end up with strange boards. It forces both players to think more, and this is the territory where Carlsen excels.
(7:05) white: Knight to E4 (u said a good idea, I disagree) *blk Bishop will come up -Queen will have angle support -rook slids over & -knight will move 2Xs (maybe) These moves will take 2 or 3 pieces, offsetting white positioning in center of board... (lets see what happens, haha)
it's pretty well known that openings don't matter in blitz. accuracy and speed are what get you to the top in the world. 3 | 0 is three minutes, this isn't classical. speed and accuracy combo will always be king in blitz. openings don't matter at all
It's hard to know how sound such a strange opening is; but we can certainly see its benefits with that strong mating threat. IMHO, the loudness of the sound of the pieces moving could be about half of what it is here; since they are well louder than your narration.
Uggghhh... dang trash day, completely forgot... running outside barefoot, swinging arms to trash dude, stepoing in rocky dirt, dragging out 2 cans cauz i had to, hahahaha... crazy...
I'm pretty sure he likes unconventional openings, to take players out of opening preparation, and to make it more about calculation and strategy, which he is usually better at. He's also known to make disadvantageous sacrifices in closed positions, just to try to win the endgame, which he's really good at.
"Invents new opening" is very far from what did happen in this game. This way to play as black has a history of 70+ years, and Jaan Ehlvest recently authored a book about it (The Modern Gurgenidze). Objectively allowing so much space to white cannot be a very good idea, but this is not an important factor for nonclassical time controls.
Overall great analysis, however, you need to upgrade your engine to the latest Stockfish 16.1 dev-20240719-a8401e80, and perhaps a much more powerful PC, and then you won't make moronic statements, like at 11:54 "for example, let's say black wastes a move like Re1" - ummm, Re1 is, by far, the best move at +0.00, the next best move (Kh6) is -4.20 😮🙄 - basically, a huge blunder by Magnus. btw, I'm OK with clickbait titles from RUclipsrs with 446 subs, so that part is fine. 👍
Yes if memory is correct re1 was selected as it was the best, that was not the best phrase on my part, I should have explained it differently, thank you! 🙏
That’s literally the job of a chess commentator who is analyzing a game after it’s over 🤣 Obviously I’m not a GM, but it’s my job to explain the best ideas for both sides!
@@drmikechessThat’s really cool. In another perspective, I think this is why GMs deserve the respect: They don’t care if it’s a Bongcloud or a 600 Elo pawn storm opening or a midgame blunder, and can still win creatively with whatever disadvantage they are at.
Nothing new about this opening. This is a middlegame story, coming from a slightly worse opening. Middlegame and endgame is where Magnus gets the highest chunk of his ELO.
@@drmikechess I often see great players play the second or third best moves early in the game. Are they booked up or are they just using tactical mechanics? I don't know. For example I currently play the St George defense against 1.e4 only because Magnus did it in a game or two. Did he book up or did he just play 1... a6 because he felt like it? Good opening though.
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4 locking kingside, then novelty na6 connected with knight transfer to g7, is an entirely new concept, so by definition it’s new 😉
@@drmikechess I have and I've played the Gurgenidze. But I'm just an amateur watching amateur games and it's an amateur move.....until now. When Magnus plays it it is a novelty because GM's like Magnus don't play amateur moves. That's what I mean. Remember when Kasparov played 3.Ng1 against Anand in an English opening. They called it a novelty. It's been seen many times before in amateur games but when Kasparov played it then it's a novelty because Ng1 no longer is amateurish. It's a real move. Played at the highest level.
I think he will get better with time as do most good content creators. I suppose this is a startup (not sure) but it is a labor of love that takes time to be great.
Regarding some comments,ts about "clickbait" I do agree it is annoying. Far worse when such clickbait is used in serious videos like political analysis. You start watching and waiting and waste your time until you realize you were had. But as some have said, this is youtube par for the course. We live in a world where personal gain surpasses all other motivation.
Na6 was a novelty in the opening brother, intending na6 - g7!was new concept, so I delivered on title, hence not clickbait. But appreciate your feedback!
Please stop editing the audio to remove any breaths or pauses. Too many videos on youtube edit this way making it unpleasant. It is like reading a novel where all the commas, full stops and pharagraphs have been removed by the editing. Please leave the breaths and pauses in place. Otherwise a good video.
You’re a mind reader? You know Magnus wasn’t deliberately playing this to throw Alireza off? Well I’m not a psychic, I’ll defer to your mind reading abilities on this one 😉
The worst of ALL chess commentaries on RUclips.!! The English language uses punctuations, especially the full-stop; but of course you are commenting in the American language. 😱
Invents new opening? Seriously?!? Ahemm ... this is known for at least fice decades unter the name 'Gurgenidze System'! And Magnus´ way of playing with ...h5 is the old fashioned line (and obviously he played it pretty bad, if i watch your vid and the evaluation bar! :-/); more modern is ...f6 instead as evaluated on an opening-dvd by GM Victor Boilogan
What do you think of Magnus Carlsen's opening strategy from this game? Leave your thoughts below!
His opening is called...
*well... I know it as what's called a "net & trident"...
People who have been taught all those fancy styles like Gambit & Australian & fancy named openings or endgames...
Those people don't use the terms I grew up with, nor do we use chess pieces in the same play style...
Similar, yes... samesies, no...
Still a blast playin' tho??? YES......
Crazy Mag... if I didn't know better, I'd say he was using what's called... awell, I grew up calling this style of chess game play:
"G-Style", game play... I'm honored of he really is using "G-Style"... hopefully it's intentionally, if unintentionally, im still honored...
-u most likely won't hear that style from anybody else...
I'm 1 of the last that was taught to use it... idk why I'm sharing this but I've mentioned this style on other chess vids so wtheck... 🤷♂️why not, rt 🙌👏🤝
🫵Mag... heck of a game...
🫵 commentator dude, good play by play...
This is more like "Old Wine in a New Bottle." The move ...Na6 has been played before in analogous positions, though perhaps not in exactly the position in this game. GM John Speelman, in his monograph "New Ideas in the Caro-Kann (1992 MacMillan Chess Library) notes that Keith Arkell employed ...Na6 out of an Advance Caro-Kann against John Nunn in London 1990, using it in similar fashion as Magnus: 1) e4 c6 2) d4 d5 3) e5 Na6 4) c3 Nc7 5) Ne2 g6 6) Ng3 Nh6 7) Nd2 Bg4 8) f3 Bd7 9) f4 Ne6 10) Nf3 Ng7 11) h3 Nhf5 - but leaving out the move ...h7-h5 that is characteristic of the Gurgenidze System.
GM Vlastimil Hort, in the chapter on the Gurgenodze from his book "The Modern Defence" from 1979 (RHM Press) mentions his own game Padevski-Hort from Varna 1967 in his notes to the well-known Fischer-Petrosian game from Belgrade 1970. Hort played as black: 1) d4 g6 2) e4 c6 3) f4 d5 -saving a tempo compared to Magnus- 4) e5 Na6!? 5) Nf3 h5 6) Nbd2 Nc7 &) Bd3 Nh6. Hort did not bring his knight to g7 via e6 and Padevski chose to develop his knight to d2 instead of Firouzja's Nc3.
I think Bobby Fisher would be very pleased to see this type of play. Throwing opening theory out the window and just forcing a game of pure chess. Beautiful.
Who does Magnus think he is? Magnus Carlsen? lmao ty
🤣🤣🤣
Gurgenidze invented this. I've been playing it for 50 years
Carlsens adaptation with h5-h4 then na6 intending ng7 is the novelty 😉
@@drmikechess h5-h4 its typical in this system after h3,
Why use clickbait by calling this well-known variation (Rat Defence, Accelerated Gurgenidze) a new opening invention? Magnus himself has played 5...h5 at least 3 times previously and the first potential novelty in the game is ...Na6 (in previous games reaching this position black had tried ...b6, drawing (Renner-Hickl 1993) and ...e6, winning (Pacey-Hergott 2002). This is not the way to win loyal viewers to your channel.
That’s how to become successful at RUclips and has been for years. Do you not know this by now?
Don’t worry about titles worry about content and this was great content. Chill and accept that titles need to be clickbait to be seen. Deep breaths you’re going to be ok.
@@FizzyElff I already marked this channel to YT not to recommend me any further videos. This is how to deal with clickbait. If more users used this option, the clickbait would quickly disappear.
@@FizzyElffclickbait is one thing, a kind of doublespeak I can tolerate. This is just called lying
I respectfully disagree with your loaded statement brother!!
The idea of d6 g6 c6 then h5-h4 is super rare, and the queens knight path to a6 and then eventually g7 is a fundamental part of the opening as played by Magnus in this game.
You admitted na6 was a novelty, further confirming the collective opening idea played by Magnus is new, novel, and yes more shocking than Jim Carrey exiting the rhino!
Hans Niemann might even say the video’s performance speaks for itself 😉
@@drmikechess 9...Na6 is a novelty in the relatively small database I have access to but there are many more games showing the basic concept of this opening, including the ...h5-h4 advance. As an example featuring Magnus' opponent, if black chooses 9...Bh6 instead of 9...Na6, the game transposes to Firouzja-Nihal Sarin 2024. It should not be too difficult for experienced players to get from this game, played just a month ago, to potential prep in this variation.
Speaker's sound level : 2
Chess sounds level : 2000
Bruhhhh
The chess sounds were so loud that it made my dog start barking!
I’ll fix next time! Thanks for your feedback!! 🙏
One of the attempts to gain a tempo in the Gurgenidze. Noted by McDonald in the 1980s.
I wasn’t familiar with that opening name, thanks for the insight brother! 🙏
I love the lower volume and the way you comment. Pure information without being annoying. Thank you.
Thank you!! 🙏
To a degree this game struct me as an example of random evolution underpinning a fair percentage of the moves.
A lot of Magnus Carlsen’s moves seem random to me 🤣 that guy is on another level!
Your audio ducking setup seems backwards. Game audio reduced you mic volume. Or something. Voice was constantly lowering in volume
Ok I’ll fix this, thanks for the feedback!
I don't know what is calculating the computer score, but QC4 at 11:23 is a colossal blunder on the computer score, and it isn't even commented in the audio. And there's another Q move at 12:01 where white's score plummets from a decisive lead back to 50-50. I guess it's consistently hard to find the most precise open-board queen moves in an unorthodox structure at Blitz. Magnus is playing the clock hard, here. To judge by the computer score, on a standard time control, he's often trailing the play by a big margin. But only if his opponent finds the most precise queen move on an open board under tight time controls.
Update: RF7 takes pawn throws the game away on the computer eval at 12:14. Magnus effectively wins on a massive blunder right here.
Yes this was a weird blitz game where Magnus was having fun and trying to throw alireza off guard, there were massive mistakes by both players!
One of the many things you can't criticize Magnus for is how many ideas he has! Give him a complex position, I think he'd find more ideas than any other player. They just seem to flow from him - which we can see particularly in speed chess.
(2:55) i think Mag is gonna pretend a switch sides for board control (the net)...
He's gonna end up controlling 3 columns/Letters "F&G"...
I'll guess "DorH"
-show attack weak side, slice a sliver off the strong... ending in a +2 piece for Mag with threat to King & 2 other pieces...
(before using "rook with queen" & 2 pawns with a knight)
Ill be... dangit... Magnus did use a "net & trident" (trident: 3 point spear)
*i mentioned this previously...
-I believe i also mentioned just about everything he's doing up till now (12:05)...
-I did mismention +2 (oops, ment -2) & a few minor details incorrect...
-controls F&G, then B & ends up winning with checkmate on H... using Queen & Rook...
Holy heck, i called this 1... no edited comments & hopefully time stamps for my posts align with game play... within reasonable time span...
I'll pat myself on my back...
Magnus is a genius, he broke the Firouza preparation and he knew the weakness of the opponent.
Magnus had next level mind games, he smells a weakness then plays bizarre moves to break your spirit 🤣
Back in the days, Magnus Carlsen bought everything from Garri Kasparov opnigns move about 10000 of them, I don't think Carlsen has used any of them yet ;)
What a fun vid and great commentary, it really carried the excitement of the game.
Thank you! 🙏
Carlsen is a quick thinker so it is a good strategy for him to make unexpected moves that end up with strange boards. It forces both players to think more, and this is the territory where Carlsen excels.
Yes. Bobby Fischer became disgusted with chess because of all the memorization of book moves and theory, leading him to invent "Fischer Random."
"Turn up your vocal mic,check your levels before posting"-Sound Engineer
Thank you! I’m working on improving the audio! 🙏
This might be my favorite chess match. GG Magnus
👍
Best of luck. Hope this channel does immensely well.
Thank you brother!!!
At 6:36 is pawn to g4 to fork Magnus' 2 kns. goofy?
Maybe, can someone else help this brother out?
Why is your board so laggy?
wow. its amazing how one wrong move change the eval bar
I much prefer silent chess. It helps to understand the moves without someone rattling of this move or that move.
Mangus is the Great Confuser in chess.
🤣 agreed! 👍
thank you for that delightful play by play! :)
(7:05) white: Knight to E4 (u said a good idea, I disagree)
*blk Bishop will come up
-Queen will have angle support
-rook slids over & -knight will move 2Xs (maybe)
These moves will take 2 or 3 pieces, offsetting white positioning in center of board...
(lets see what happens, haha)
it's pretty well known that openings don't matter in blitz. accuracy and speed are what get you to the top in the world. 3 | 0 is three minutes, this isn't classical. speed and accuracy combo will always be king in blitz. openings don't matter at all
It's hard to know how sound such a strange opening is; but we can certainly see its benefits with that strong mating threat. IMHO, the loudness of the sound of the pieces moving could be about half of what it is here; since they are well louder than your narration.
Good cos this guy's annoying and who is he to nay say MC
I mean, it is blitz in an entertainment focused setting
Thank you for the feedback, I’ll tone down the piece noise next time!
Uggghhh... dang trash day, completely forgot... running outside barefoot, swinging arms to trash dude, stepoing in rocky dirt, dragging out 2 cans cauz i had to, hahahaha... crazy...
The name is Alireza not Alireshja. The opening is also called Blockade on the white squares and played in the early '70's. See 'The Modern Defence'.
thinking that H4 so long before was the trick. What a bullshit. Magnus just got lucky that Alireza blundered by taking the pawn 12:13
I think Magnus gets bored and tries new things just for some adventure,and stumble in to positions that are working! Love the strategy!
I'm pretty sure he likes unconventional openings, to take players out of opening preparation, and to make it more about calculation and strategy, which he is usually better at. He's also known to make disadvantageous sacrifices in closed positions, just to try to win the endgame, which he's really good at.
Yes you are right! It’s like Mike Tyson said - everyone has a plan until you get punched in the face! Haha
"Invents new opening" is very far from what did happen in this game. This way to play as black has a history of 70+ years, and Jaan Ehlvest recently authored a book about it (The Modern Gurgenidze).
Objectively allowing so much space to white cannot be a very good idea, but this is not an important factor for nonclassical time controls.
My guess is Mike isn't that familiar with the Modern Defense. Nothing highly unusual about how Magnus played this game.
Agree to disagree, his adaptation with h5-h4 to lock the kingside then na6 (novelty!!) intending transfer to g7 was new and highly provocative 😉
@@drmikechess
[Event "Ch Germany"]
[Site "Germany"]
[Date "1993.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Christoph Renner"]
[Black "Joerg Hickl"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
1. e4 g6 2. d4 d6 3. Nc3 c6 4. f4 d5 5. e5 h5 6. Be3 Nh6 7. h3 Nf5 8. Bf2 h4 9.
Nf3 b6 10. Bd3 e6 11. Ne2 Ba6 12. O-O Be7 13. Rc1 Bxd3 14. Qxd3 O-O 15. c4 a5
16. a3 Na6 17. cxd5 Qxd5 18. Nc3 Qd7 19. Rfd1 Nc7 20. Ne4 Nd5 21. Qd2 Kg7 22.
Rc2 Rac8 23. Rdc1 Rfd8 24. Nc3 Rc7 25. Nxd5 Qxd5 26. Rc4 Rdc8 27. Kh1 b5 28.
R4c2 b4 29. axb4 axb4 30. Qe1 Rh8 31. Rc4 Qb5 32. b3 Qd5 33. Kh2 Ra7 34. Rxc6
Ra3 35. Rc7 Rxb3 36. Rxe7 Nxe7 37. Bxh4 Ng8 38. Rc8 Rh5 39. Rd8 Qa5 40. d5 Rxf3
41. gxf3 g5 42. Bxg5 Rxg5 1/2-1/2
There are other examples. The whole idea with h5 h4, I first saw in an old David Norwood video in the 90s and ive used it quite a bit since.
Obviously, move for move, the game is unique, as are most games. But this isnt the invention of a "whole new opening" or crazy outrageous ideas.
Overall great analysis, however, you need to upgrade your engine to the latest Stockfish 16.1 dev-20240719-a8401e80, and perhaps a much more powerful PC, and then you won't make moronic statements, like at 11:54 "for example, let's say black wastes a move like Re1" - ummm, Re1 is, by far, the best move at +0.00, the next best move (Kh6) is -4.20 😮🙄 - basically, a huge blunder by Magnus. btw, I'm OK with clickbait titles from RUclipsrs with 446 subs, so that part is fine. 👍
Yes if memory is correct re1 was selected as it was the best, that was not the best phrase on my part, I should have explained it differently, thank you! 🙏
This is not a bad idea but my engine says there's a better one. Finally, a good idea, because my engine said so.
😂
1:10 who does Magnus think he is? Magnus Carlsen?
🤣🤣🤣
You took your time. Your love for chess the the love you showcased in your video, beware, you will be famous soon light warrior.
Thank you brother! I just want to make the best chess videos that I can! 🙏
who does Magnus think he is, Magnus Carlsen? 🤣hahahahahh
🤣🤣🤣
Imagine telling magnus that his chess move is not the best idea and then suggesting a better move to the best chess player ever.
If it is Stockfish making the suggestion then that's allowable - after all, Stockfish would never lose a single game to Magnus.
@@ngc-fo5teha!
That’s literally the job of a chess commentator who is analyzing a game after it’s over 🤣
Obviously I’m not a GM, but it’s my job to explain the best ideas for both sides!
@@drmikechess Great work I'm Subscribing .
@@drmikechess Well said, good job on the vid! Very fun!
Is the speaker cyber-bullying Alireza, or he has a malformation to his palate?
I’ve been told I’m mispronouncing his name, I’ll have it fixed for the next video!
…So maybe option #2 🤣🤣🤣
Please set move clicks down 6 db ,,, good podcast !
I was anmpyed for your continues and non stopped talking.
Sorry you didn't like it, I'll keep trying to improve!
Alireza is not ready for Magnus.
Pretty sure Morphy would destroy Carlson's poor play.
Accidently double spliced segmeny at 320
I’ll fix this - thank you! 🙏
3… c6 can’t be a new move. Use that many times in the past and have won some games with that.
Analysis of a board game to this degree tells me all I need to know about this world.
certainly tells us all we need to know about you
@@maht0x dang, who pissed in your corn flakes?
@@Makeallmensee you!
Some people just love an exciting game of chess! 💪
@@maht0x you should taste it straight from the hose
Seriously, I see this opening pawn structure (a7 b7 c6 d5 e7 f7 g6 h5) in 20% of my 600 Elo games.
And I lost to all of them.
🤣 carlsens idea of h5-h4 then na6 intending route to g7 is new in my database
@@drmikechessThat’s really cool. In another perspective, I think this is why GMs deserve the respect: They don’t care if it’s a Bongcloud or a 600 Elo pawn storm opening or a midgame blunder, and can still win creatively with whatever disadvantage they are at.
thank you very much
Thank you brother! 💪
your mic is low volume
I’m working on it, thanks for the feedback! 👍
Nothing new about this opening. This is a middlegame story, coming from a slightly worse opening. Middlegame and endgame is where Magnus gets the highest chunk of his ELO.
Na6 was a novelty, plan of na6 to g7 was new for this opening brother 😉 but yes Magnus is a middle game endgame monster!
@@drmikechess I often see great players play the second or third best moves early in the game. Are they booked up or are they just using tactical mechanics? I don't know. For example I currently play the St George defense against 1.e4 only because Magnus did it in a game or two. Did he book up or did he just play 1... a6 because he felt like it? Good opening though.
Fianchetto of the knight is common in the Czech Benoni.
Well na6 was a novelty, the concept of na6 - g7 was new to me at least 😁
Never heard alireza being called alirejža
stop cutting the pauses FCS
WHO does Magnus Carlson think he is? Magnus Carlson? 😂
The tune is so silent.
Invents?? This is simply common in bullet games, why would this be considered new in any way?
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4 locking kingside, then novelty na6 connected with knight transfer to g7, is an entirely new concept, so by definition it’s new 😉
Magnus has been getting material from GM Igor Smirnov’s site for quite a while now ….
Interesting!
blunderfest
1:54 bye bye. Click bait
See you next time!
bro the laggg . i cant
Sorry I will work on it!
Who does Magnus Carlsen think he is? Magnus Carlsen? 😅
Haha only reason I like the video is cause of this comment hahaha
🤣🤣🤣
Wasted 13min
why are you repeating moves?
What do you mean?
Really poor video editing....
@@drmikechess - 2:57 and 3:20 the video is repeated by bad editing.
Awesome game!
Thank you brother! 🙏
Ive seen this before. This isnt new. This is the gurgenidze.
You’ve seen na6 before? Then na6 - g7? Because na6 was a novelty 😉
@@drmikechess I have and I've played the Gurgenidze. But I'm just an amateur watching amateur games and it's an amateur move.....until now. When Magnus plays it it is a novelty because GM's like Magnus don't play amateur moves. That's what I mean. Remember when Kasparov played 3.Ng1 against Anand in an English opening. They called it a novelty. It's been seen many times before in amateur games but when Kasparov played it then it's a novelty because Ng1 no longer is amateurish. It's a real move. Played at the highest level.
Chess new ideas with engine move 😅
Can you adjust your volume and criticise less 2800 players
Ok I will work on both!
There is nothing one can invent in a game with fix rules
@Nickname_42 well yes you can because invent means come up with an idea people haven't played/thought of before
@@eyeofhorus1301 Its not possible to prove it. How could one know what xy played in 1854 i.e.
By that logic, one cannot invent anything in real life, as the laws of physics are fixed
We have to agree to disagree on this one brother!!
@@drmikechess Thought about that as well and in some way one can discover, but not invent.
@@Nickname_42 Same thing whoever was the first person who ever made a wheel is who invented it but no one can ever invent it again
What's new about this?I saw it many times,it's rare but not new
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4, then novelty na6, swinging knight a6 to g7, is very new brother, never played in history of chess 😉
Sound level way too low.
I’m working on improving the audio! Thanks for the feedback! 🙏
@@drmikechess 👍 Good to know, the content is great.
Video quality little poor
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
2:57 and 3:20 the video is repeated by bad editing.
I think he will get better with time as do most good content creators. I suppose this is a startup (not sure) but it is a labor of love that takes time to be great.
@@idocare6538 - yes - other than that it was pretty good.
Thank you - it’s fixed, will be updated shortly!! 🙏
Yes I’m just starting, I did not expect to get this many views so fast! I will keep improving!! 💪
Thank you! 🙏
Please learn how to correctly pronounce Alireza's first and last names.
Ok I’ll correct it, wasn’t aware I was mispronouncing, thanks brother!
Regarding some comments,ts about "clickbait" I do agree it is annoying. Far worse when such clickbait is used in serious videos like political analysis. You start watching and waiting and waste your time until you realize you were had. But as some have said, this is youtube par for the course. We live in a world where personal gain surpasses all other motivation.
Na6 was a novelty in the opening brother, intending na6 - g7!was new concept, so I delivered on title, hence not clickbait. But appreciate your feedback!
You have 412 subs, And 411 likes on the video! Who didnt like it???
Haha 😂
not fairuja but 'ferusha'
Thank you I’ll correct!
Please stop editing the audio to remove any breaths or pauses. Too many videos on youtube edit this way making it unpleasant. It is like reading a novel where all the commas, full stops and pharagraphs have been removed by the editing. Please leave the breaths and pauses in place. Otherwise a good video.
Ok thanks for the feedback brother, I'll keep improving!
Sound of pieces is too loud compared to your voice
gurguenidze defense nothing new 👍
wow!
This is just adaptive play..
You’re a mind reader? You know Magnus wasn’t deliberately playing this to throw Alireza off? Well I’m not a psychic, I’ll defer to your mind reading abilities on this one 😉
Pirc defence
alireza played really bad, another player would have won this
Dude! Normalize your audio, please. You're all over the place.
New videos are better, but thank you for the feedback!!
Click bait. Bye
Thanks for watching my video! It’s an old video, the new videos sound more your style, hope you stick around!
Lmao it's a well known opening. Funny to see clickbait beginner analysis
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Good commentary it just sounded his voice is monotonous. Maybe just me. I get bored easily on this analysis.
I’ll work on it, thanks for the feedback! 🙏
Practice pronunciation?😂
I’ll work on it! I’m new to the chess RUclips space 🤣
The worst of ALL chess commentaries on RUclips.!! The English language uses punctuations, especially the full-stop; but of course you are commenting in the American language. 😱
Sorry you didn’t like it brother! I’ll keep improving - see you next time!! 😉
Invents new opening? Seriously?!? Ahemm ... this is known for at least fice decades unter the name 'Gurgenidze System'! And Magnus´ way of playing with ...h5 is the old fashioned line (and obviously he played it pretty bad, if i watch your vid and the evaluation bar! :-/); more modern is ...f6 instead as evaluated on an opening-dvd by GM Victor Boilogan
But his idea h5-h4 then novelty na6 intending transfer to g7 is new concept brother, hence the title 😉
CLICK BAIT
😂😂🎉
A new opening????? Gurgenidze system . Your chess culture is rather low.
D6 g6 c6 d5, then h5-h4 to lock kingside, then novelty na6 connected with knight transfer to g7 is new opening concept brother!! 😉
Terrible game
shut uppp a second.........shut up ...breath
👍
very annoying voice....dont stop a fraction sec to talking talking talks
Thanks for your feedback!