The Apostle Paul was the anti-christ according to the first Christians
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 сен 2013
- Jesus says do not change Jewish law. Paul says we do not have to obey those laws. The first Christians thought that Paul was the anti-christ. He did not know Jesus and was not with jesus and his claims in biblical times were not accepted by Jews or Christians.
Most independent religious historians point out that Jesus taught that the way to make it to Heaven was to love God and love your neighbor, in other words, by our deeds of love and mercy. Paul taught that the key was to have faith in Jesus. Most Christians today emphasize Paul's road of having faith and NOT Jesus' narrow way of loving God and loving others. Jesus even taught in Matthew that if we fail to feed the hungry and clothe the naked, we will not go to Heaven. Yet, most Christians today believe that faith in Jesus is all that is needed. However, this is NOT what Jesus preached.
Yes, to have eternal life. Do you believe in the resurrection? The righteous will inherit the kingdom on earth.
Because it is sooo convenient to just believe in Paul, you don't have to obey any law and avoid forbidden things, just have faith and forget what Jesus said all his life and you shall go to heaven, LOL it's so soothing, comforting, and convenient.
That’s why I call Paul’s teachings “Paul-inanity!” There’s nothing “Christ-inanity” about it. Paul IMHO was a charlatan and huckster, much like Donald Trump.
But what if we are poor ourselves and can’t do good works by helping the poor? Are we damned to hell?
@@tillyanne1133 there are many ways to be generous. Doesn't have to be with your wealth
Gotta laugh at the commenters who use Pauls writings to prove Paul. It would be same as using Joseph Smith writings to prove Joseph Smith...which Mormons do.
@TOUGH GUY Jesus is servant of God.
@TOUGH GUY But I ask God to send Peace & Blessings upon Jesus & I call upon the name of God of Jesus. I serve my God the Lord of Jesus. I worship Him alone like Jesus worshipped Him. I follow Jesus.
Peace♡
@TOUGH GUY I believe Jesus is word of God & Spirit from God.
@TOUGH GUY God said 'Be' & Jesus was created in the womb of Mary without a father. Jesus ﷺ is not God.
That is so true. Thankfully belief in Jesus doesn't exist solely with what is written about him. The Tanakh, or old testament and nature validate him perfectly. People misunderstood Jesus stopping an adulterer from being stoned and him and the apostles doing things on the Sabbath as him saying we don't need to follow the rules. Yet we can only bend rules to temper punishment with forgiveness and mercy, and doing things to glorify god and further the kingdom out of need and love.
"Better not call Paul"
I have a book about Paul the man (not Paul the Apostle). Paul the man it says was someone with a brash, forward personality who had to be in charge & first in everything. The more I read the book it sounds like if he wasnt doing what he did he probably would have been a used chariot salesman.
I read that sales book too 6 years ago. It was not a good book though.
Oh but he was salesman in religion..?
@@techknowsimply A good friend of mine calls him Promoter Paul
What was the name of this book?
@@nora2denver
I have so many books in a large storage unit I can't get in there. If I remember right it's something like greatest faith ever or something like that.
was a Pharisee. One day he had a ‘revelation’. He changed his name from Saul to Paul, and straightway preached his revelations about the ‘Christ’ in the synagogues. Paul continued to have new ‘revelations’ that spoke ‘of’ and ‘for’ a Christ, but he was glaringly silent about the actual life of Yahoshua (Jesus) and his teachings. In Paul’s epistles we find him using the words ‘Christ, Son of God, grace, redemption, resurrection, etc.’, but we learn little or nothing about Yahoshua and his actual teachings. They’re virtually absent from Paul’s epistles. What we learn about are Paul’s revelations. Roughly 50% of the New Testament (13 epistles) is from Saul, a man who neither knew Yahoshua in the flesh, nor was instructed by the apostles. Rather, he taught by unsubstantiated revelation, Ezekiel 13:2-9.
Paul considered himself the ‘apostle’ to the Gentiles, primarily because his doctrine (called ‘that way’, Acts 19:9, 23) was rejected by Jewish Christians and the Asian churches alike; and he was forced to seek converts who knew nothing of Yahudim (Jewish) customs and the Law. Paul’s doctrine was adverse to the teachings of Yahoshua; and he was often in conflict with James, Peter, and John; the real apostles. And by the way, Paul was not an apostle.
+Mary fares Paul brought the gospel that's the teaching that we all need to know and he's in no contradiction to James or Peter they all align together it's just that James and Peter were talking to pharisees that needed to understand that they can't be saved by works but only by faith in Jesus Christ which Paul adamantly talks about to the gentiles in a more lawless manner for gentiles didn't follow the law of God for they weren't Jews.
Also if you read 2 Peter you can sae him call Paul a beloved so if Paul is some outcast that contradicts the Gospel then how come do they call him brother and beloved ? The reason is because you are wrong about this and Acts 19:9 is talking about when Paul goes to a synagouge that has PHARISEES IN IT
Acts 19:8 "8And he entered the synagogue and continued speaking out boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading them about the kingdom of God. 9But when some were becoming hardened and disobedient, speaking evil of the Way before the people, he withdrew from them and took away the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus."
Those some in the passage are referring to Jews who hate the gospel of Jesus Christ for they are keepers of the law and liked it that way as they wallowed in their own self righteousness and of course Paul withdrew himself because there's no need for him to be there when their HEARTS ARE HARDENED so that means they won't listen to Paul so he goes elsewhere and the way is the WAY OF JESUS CHRIST it's pretty obvious as Jesus says I'm the way truth and the light no one comes to the Father except through me, so obviously Paul is using that fact about Jesus to call his message the Way which makes perfect sense
Way to go taking that out of context.
Sigur, you have too much faith in the Vatican scribes...they've profited handsomely from the Pauline doctrines.
Jesus came to end the blood sacrifices. NO shedding of innocent blood can atone for sins...in fact it can only ADD to the condemnation!
Paul has successfully convinced billions of people that it's ok to sin and to claim Jesus blood as payment for sins! If you wouldn't personally slice his throat like a sacrificial goat/lamb, or nail his hands to the cross....why do you consent to that evil act being done for, and on behalf of, you????
You were instructed to be truly sorry and humble about sinful mistakes...and to seek forgiveness from our Father. He is quick to forgive us and help us heal...but only through sincere repentance.
Blood sacrifice ENDED the second Jesus died on the cross...but Paul/Saul has got everyone claiming/pleading his blood as 'payment'...and thereby turning your back on our Fathers offering of mercy and forgiveness.
I despair at our gullibility. The Vatican will never tell you the truth. They've admitted their authority was gained through forged documents...it's common knowledge...and there is no lie they wouldn't tell, or any murder they wouldn't commit, to keep their position, wealth, and power.
Lastly...the Jesuits!!! There is little excuse for such gross ignorance in these days of free and extensive Internet facilitated research...the Jesuits are one of the most evil organisations on the planet of all time!! Perhaps you should read the Jesuits extreme oath (taken for the highest ranking positions) and then ask yourself if they would bat an eyelid at changing scripture or sneakily adding in false passages to validate their profitable deception???
There's something very very wrong with all religious organisations right now...they are forcing the Noahhide laws down our necks...but they aren't biblical...THEY'RE FROM THE BABYLONIAN KABBALISTIC TALMUD!!!
The Noahhide laws will be ruthless and tyrannical. It states in the Talmud that ALL Christians that refuse to renounce Jesus as God (or the son of God)...will be charged with idolatry, and that is an automatic death sentence! This is law in the Talmud for the non-Jewish goyim!
They've cleverly got people watching Islam and microchips...and forgetting the warnings about the hidden synagogue of Satan that pretend to be Jews!!! Talmud even instructs the rabbis that goyim Noahhides MUST be marked on their foreheads!!!
No one is going to see it coming!!!
Take care 😔💕
Those who followed Jesus were followers of the way. Those who follow Paul are called Christians.
You are spot on! I couldn’t have said that better.
Very well said. So glad there are more and more people to understand this!😘
If Pauls was so great Jesus would have said Paul will come after Him with another addition to His Truth
right, jesus pbuh said the praised one would come after him which is muhammad saw
True, I also found suspicious that Paul only met two of Jesus Disciples, Peter and James.
Paul's jesus was the thorn of satan in his flesh. Gospel of thomas 7 and 108 I BECOME that person. Yeshua is messiah but jesus is satan
@@crackedtv2195 No 😂
@@saintfreezy6914
Yes 😂. YOU just have NO CLUE.
BOTH Moses and Jesus foretold the coming of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon them all) who will bring THE FINALITY of God's message to mankind.
THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER, through BOTH Moses and Jesus, FORETOLD of the coming of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon them all). God Almighty also gave the very serious threat and warning that He Himself will be *THE REVENGER* AGAINST those who do not follow this Prophet.
🔥UNFORTUNATELY, YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT THE VERY SCRIPTURES WHICH YOU PROFESS TO UPHOLD. False teachers in the footsteps of Paul the FERO10US W0LF in SHEEP'S clothing whom Jesus WARNED about have done a fantastic job on YOU. The Bible testifies. 🔥
The foretelling through Moses connects with the foretelling through Jesus:
Deuteronomy 18 V 18
👉 *he* shall speak unto them 🚩 ALL that I shall command *him* 👈
👉 my words which *he* shall speak in my name 👈
John 16:13
👉 *He* will not speak on *his* own; *he* will speak only what *he* hears 👈
John 14:16 AND 16:13 *Jesus FORETOLD of the coming of the Prophet of Deuteronomy 18 V 18-19 Prophet Muhammad* (peace be upon him)
In 1 John 2:1 we are told:
My dear children, I write this to you so that you will not sin. But if anybody does sin, we have 👉 *A HELPER* 👈 with the Father--Jesus Christ, the Righteous One
And Jesus said in John 14:16
And I will ask the Father, and he will give you
👉 *ANOTHER HELPER* 👈 to help you and be with you forever--
👉 *A HELPER* Jesus to be replaced by *ANOTHER HELPER* Muhammad 👈
The term used there in Greek for *ANOTHER* IS allon
ἄλλον
another
This *ANOTHER* refers to someone of THE SAME KIND.
*Jesus was a man and a Prophet. So the ANOTHER HELPER was also a man and a Prophet* ✔️✔️
John 14:16 AND 16:13 *Jesus FORETOLD of the coming of the Prophet of Deuteronomy 18 V 18-19 Prophet Muhammad* (peace be upon him)
John 14:16
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you *ANOTHER HELPER* that he may abide with you for ever;
John 16:13
But when *he* , the Spirit of truth, comes, *he* will guide you into 🚩 ALL the truth. 👉 *He* will not speak on *his* own; *he* will speak only what *he* hears 👈
Deuteronomy 18:18 “I (God) will raise them up a Prophet from among their
brethren, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in *his* mouth; and 👉 *he* shall speak unto them all that I shall command *him* 👈.”
Deuteronomy 18:19 we read: “And it shall come to pass, [that] whosoever will not hearken unto 👉 my words which *he* shall speak in my name 👈 , I will require [it] of him.”
"... thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars!" - Rev 2:2
Amen there's nobody to talk to you about this there's no church or anything that follows this nothing... Everyone is Paul and Bible worshipers
@Rebecca mohr Look into Islam. One Message Foundation is a good debate/discussion channel for it.
Paul taking about no thing being unclean to eat and then Christ specifically calling out the practice of eating sacrificial meat is a very unambiguous proof to us that Paul was a liar and the antichrist of the era of our Lord.
@@jlinms8721 If y'all are complaining about Paul's reception on the Damascus road and his command about eating food, I'd hate to see what y'all would think of Peter's vision in Acts 10:9-16
@@DRYeisleysCreations I'd hate to see what you think about Jesus explicitly rebuking Paul's claim that food burnt at the alter was suitable to eat, which happened in Revelation.
Paul said '' if by my lie I spread the gospel why do people attack me '' Paul was based in Ephesus and Jesus told John in Revelations that the Apostles in Ephesus were fakes and liars
Yes, You are absolutely correct!💕
You sir, deserve a gold medal!
Finally someone who listens to the words of Christ and not to the evil scribes.
@@ismailkraimi5796 so the original text were destroyed? If I might say today bible (any bible) only equivalent of hadits since its heavily altered it's not even near close as "shahih"
@@ismailkraimi5796 no, what I meant is not NT but whatever text which still in the form pure Jesus teaching ...according to you it's Paul follower who destroy it? I though it was the Jews along with Rome official
Finally...... an acknowledgement that it's really Paulianity not Christianity.
Paul says not to say you are of Paul so you're really just hating the Bible which is the inspired word of God bro.
@frank sanders
True.
Jesus said: By the fruits ye shall know them.
Radical Monotheism exactly like the Jewish Prophets / Jews to believe in a uniquely ONE GOD - without any partners or equals or like a three in one coffee the abomination of the Trinity - plus believing in the Messiah Jesus the Prophet sent by God, and the essential consistency with his doctrine - the Muslim.
The very words that the Father - THE ONLY TRUE GOD - COMMANDED Jesus Christ to say. The doctrine of THE ONLY TRUE GOD that HE COMMANDED Jesus Christ to give.
The testimony of Jesus Christ on the Father:
- The Only True God (John 17:3)
- The Only One Who Knows The Hour (Mark 13:32)
- Greater than I (John 14:28)
- Greater than all (John 10:29)
- My God and Your God (John 20:17)
The doctrine of Jesus Christ =
The doctrine of a Muslim.
(Of course the term Father in the Jewish context. A figure of speech for their times. NOT that God has a literal Son. God has got Son by the Ton in the Bible.)
VERSUS
Christianity more like the Greek and Roman doctrines and the pagan doctrines like "God" coming down in human form and human / blood sacrifice that pagans had going hand in hand with Paul's doctrines of easy salvation with blood of an innocent, making the Merciful God in to a blood thirsty vampire.
2000 years ago, the Roman and Greek Empire with its culture and mythological and pagan roots already held the beliefs such as "God coming down in human form". So after witnessing just a single "miracle" from Paul the deceiver they were conforming to their already held beliefs. No wonder when they heard of this guy Jesus with all the stories of his miracles, it was very easy for them to take him as "Son of God" (and this concept later on developed in to taking him as God) as this already went hand in hand with their pagan and mythological belief system. Little wonder that those times and those places and people also had "Triads" and ancient "Trinities" and "God" in threes and stuff.
Acts 14:11
When the crowd saw what Paul had done, they shouted in the Lycaonian language, "THE GODS HAVE COME DOWN to us IN HUMAN FORM!"
******
Then of course the abomination of the alleged blood "sacrifice" of Jesus Christ making the Most Merciful in to some blood thirsty vampire. Going against the very teachings of the true Prophets and that includes Jesus Christ.
********
Unfortunately, it was the Pauline Christianity and Pauline doctrines, backed up by the powerful Roman Empire that eventually won out over the years and wiped out the Jewish Christianity of radical monotheism. Rome didn't convert to "Christianity", "Christianity" converted to Rome.
The power of God sets captives free. They preached Christ and him crucified and suffered at the hands of men, sang praises in chains and the prison door opened, a jail keeper and his family were saved and we all need to read the whole Bible for ourselves and not cherry pick.
Larry Cavalli who is your God?
@Larry Cavalli Jesus is my God and I could live by His words alone and, yes the bible has been edited etc.. but that does not take away from the works of the apostles and believers whom to this day and from the beginning were crucified, burned as candles, dropped in burning oil, thrown to lions and bears in front of crowds, beheaded etc....i love those people and i love their works....mostly i love Jesus Christ
It's very clear in acts alone who Paul is, I've found him misquoting Habakkuk and lying and manipulating. Barnabas was sent with him to keep tabs on him and after acts 15 he's completely cut off from any fellowship with the apostles there's so much to it its crazy
Paul is not Paul, Paul is Saul 20 to 50 years after Christ's death.
He was quoting the Septuagint not misquoting anything
@@ionutdinchitila1663 And God would not inspire him to quote from the Septuagint, if Paul were a true Apostle, since the Septuagint has been proven to be a later reading, not true to the original.
@@thealiachekzaifoundationof3822 Paul is a true apostle. Anyone who says otherwise is believing lies put forth by Bible haters.
It is very clear who Paul is. Paul is an apostle of Jesus Christ. Anyone who says he's not, needs to read their Bible and not the deceptive lies of Truth Haters.
Peter wrote about Paul, called him a beloved brother, and compared his writings to other scripture.
The Bible 100x> Anti-Paul LIARS.
It always amazes me how people either over look or purposely disregard the words of Christ when they try to justify their beliefs.
Like with the pre trib rapture.
They will toss a bunch of scripture verses at you, avoiding Matthew 24 at all costs.
I always ask," What should we do with what Christ says in matthew 24? They just toss more verses and eventually unfriend me or just no longer associate with me.
Pointing out Paul's contradicting many of the things Christ said infuriates them. They warn me about calling someone a false preacher.
It's sad and maddening
Islam is right. Christianity is corrupted.
Their mind is stoned. If you question about any contradiction in those Paul teach and everything, they would just do that.
They'd just say: have faith.
And all would be cleared. It's convenient
@@doupe9768 Do not believe this video or any lies about Paul. They are lies conceived by Bible skeptics and Bible doubters.
Notice how many of the people on here are Muslims and Bible scoffers?
That should tell you all you need to know about those beliefs.
In fact, one of the earliest people to conceive the notion that Paul was a deceiver and a plagiarist was Adolf Hitler, and look how messed up HIS version of Christianity. He didn't even believe Jesus was a Jew!
I just went and read it. Which part exactly about there being false prophets, the generation not passing before tribulation and the day of the Second coming not being known except for The Father do you refer to? Because nothing that's said there substantiated that Paul was practically "a false" prophet, Just that there will be some false Prophets.
I have no conclusion but to think your arguments are moronic and unsubstantiated.
Ergo: John 3:16.
Now go lie somewhere else.
@@doupe9768 If you think that's what THe Gospel is son, you're INDEED DUPED. Is moronic and plain wrong to think that. This is how you clarify it.
ruclips.net/video/soLhahpZMgI/видео.html
All you're doing is STRAW Manning people like this man:
William Tyndale.
And showing your complete and utter ignorance about the entire history of Christianity, what the real Gospel is and how EVERYONE lies.
Thanks for thinking so little about every real Christian ever. You're doing so well in your self deceived arrogance is actually sad to watch.
This is a doctrine of Devils.
1Cor 14;37 If any man think himself to be spiritual let him acknowledge the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord!
Paul was saying that the OT laws could only point out sin, and not really do anything else about it. He realized that trying to live a holy life by following the Commandments would be futile, something that Jesus certainly seemed to say in Matthew 5. Jesus completely fulfilled the Law, and He imparts that righteousness onto born-again believers.
lol
jesus himself prayed with his head ot the ground. like jews and muslims still do. chrisitians today...it's doesn't matter LOL
@@salman13 stop trying to make Jesus Muslim. You will answer for that one day, just wait
@@ASMRyouVEGANyet
Read the whole thing carefully. Ill use yoir own words to prove my point. You can consult with the holy spirit you pretend to have when reading the bible too. He'll be the first to prove his reading skills are terrible when we start looking at context and how you guys dont think about what you read.
Jesus prayed to a God. He said he doesn't want to get strung up and tortured but if his god wills, he's ok with it as well. That's submission. In arabic, we'd say he's Muslim 🤣. So , right off the bat, you're wrong.
I can back it up using jewish expressions and context. You cant make Jesus into god using his words alone because he is incompetent... that's why you need to put so many words in his mouth. That's the issue.
Let's see. You say he is god in human form. I say he is a man. That's a huge difference and nobody on their right mind will say it's the same. So let's look at one chapter.
In john 16, Jesus , god in his infinite wisdom in human form according to you, says he will not speak in parables or confusing terms.
What was his intention and what was the context?
He noticed his followers didn't grasp what he was saying. Correct?
We see that his followers say what i believe. He is a man sent by god. That's very different from then saying "you're god in the flesh". Did jesus correct them? He didn't. So jesus is either an incompetent teacher or a liar. Which is it?
Jesus says he will not speak in confusing terms. His followers say he is a man. Jesus then says only the father is the only true god.
Suddenly, you guys and Jesus dont know what only means. You know what only means when it fits your belief that jesus is the only begotten son of God.
Why is that? Was jesus so incompetent that you need to add to his words and correct him as if he's a child? What is it?
I'll tell you. You don't think about what you read. You don't even compare stories within the bible to see if the stories for.
Let's ignore me being a muslim. There is a 99.9% chance that you are what is known as a gentile. I'll prove my point that you dont think a out what you read. Your god didnt give you intelligence and then give you scriptures that are full of lies. Your IQ
So let's use two stories from your own book. Luke 2's symeon story where jesus is called a light to the gentiles and the end of mathew 28 where he tells his apostles ( not just tom dick and harry) to go and preach to the gentiles.
Do you think these two stories are legit or made up? I'll give you a week to get in touch with the holy spirit. Then let me know. Chances are you both will run away and prove that you'd struggle with grade 7 reading comprehension exams.
So tell me, why is it in acts 9 and 10, the apostles had no clue that they were allowed to preach to gentiles? It's stupid to think mathew wrote jesus told us to preach to gentiles and then not preach to gentiles for years. (Acts 9/10 is a while after Jesus was gone). Any reasonable person wpuld have to assume the apostles and mary knew each other but again, strangely, it's like mary never told them jesus would be a light to the gentiles. If they knew he was called that, any reasonable person would preach to gentiles right away....so tell me where did luke get this story from? Did you ever think? That fake holy spirit ( basically your ego) never ring bells and make you think?
Do you really believe the apostles would ignore the fact their God told them to preach to gentiles in favor of jewish customs? And then believe peter who said god told him in a vision it was ok to preach to gentiles and then they were all cool with preaching to gentiles? 🤣
Think!!! Instead you clowns hate on islam.thinkimg you're making your god proud. You idiots are brainwashed into thinking people who tried to kill the man you say is god , are his chosen people. Maybe read the book you pretend to follow for once and look at context.
Youd know of you broke the law, you wouldnt be able to use the chisen excuse. Deut 29. You would know deut 31:24-29...the people you say are chosen are called corrupt. You clowns are brainwashed into thinking israel isnfor Jews.....no it's for those who follow god and if you tey to kill his prophets or break his laws ( like the jews in jesus time for example), you're not chosen.
Think!! You got a head. Instead , you fake followers of jesus will still hate islam. I known your book better than you. You belueve first and that's why you ignore context and even jesus own words over and over again. You need thr vague passages more than the clear statements.
@@ASMRyouVEGANyetJesus.
Is not god so stop trying to make him god.
And you don't follow the teachings of jesus anyway.
Paul worked for the Roman government to infiltrate the nazarene movement.
PAUL WAS A FOLLOWER OF ROMAN CULTURE. HE TAUGHT CHRISTIANS TO EAT MEAT. HE PROMOTES ROMAN CULTURE NOT THE TEACHINGS OF CHRIST JESUS
Wrong.
And the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH can only exist based on Paul's work... it's a deception. Holy shit... 😯
But Christian’s can eat meat since the Old Testament
Can anyone let me know from which documentaries the clips were taken? Thanks!
It's called a garbage disposal.
The one thing most everyone is missing here is that the longest gospel as well as the book describing the history of the early Church were in fact written by a Gentile, St. Luke. In the Acts of the Apostles, God appears to Peter, a Jew, in a dream and commands him to kill an eat an animal that is forbidden according to the food laws. When Peter, a Jew, refuses because it violates the food laws, God says "Rise. Kill, and eat. How can you call anything I have made unclean." The whole Gospel is based on the fact that people cannot follow all of the Old Covenant laws, because of Original Sin. Even in the garden of Eden, God tells Satan that he will put enmity between his seed and Eve's seed and that the Serpent would bruise his heel and Eve's seed (Jesus Christ) would crush his head. Jesus Christ is present throughout the Old Testament in either literal or figurative language. Examples include: "Let Us make man in Our image", Melchezidek, the Angel that wrestled with Jacob, the serpent on the pole that provided healing to the Israelites in the wilderness, the burning bush, Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22 describe in detail both events of the Crucifixion as well as the purpose of Jesus. The purpose of the Christ was not to reform the Jewish Nation. The purpose of Jesus Christ was to take upon himself, fully human and fully divine, the entire sin of the fallen creation in time universal, and take all that sin to hell by his death on the cross, destroying Death for all time, and providing the Way for God's fallen creation to be reunited with him in eternity. Period. Jesus was the perfect sacrifice. Therefore, His death on the cross abolished all of the ceremonial and sacrificial laws as well, as he became the only acceptable propitiation for my sins and yours. Instead of trying to deconstruct the Bible, why don't you spend more time constructing the Truth, which is a single story of Salvation told first orally and then written down. The Church universal and the Bible are the only objective truth. The problem with subjective truth is that if all truth was subjective then nothing would have meaning. I will close with this. Jesus himself said "If you destroy this temple, I will rebuild it in three days." If he wasn't forshadowing his crucifixion and resurrection, then what? My prayer is that all will find the answer to Pilate's question "What is truth?"
*We should keep the 10 commandments.*
Thank you ❤
Not to be saved. We are made blameless ONLY by the blood of Jesus..
@I8UB4UCY Good luck with that
@I8UB4UCY Love is the very nature of the Holy Spirit. I have had the Holy Spirit since 27 years ago. I have never said the law is abolished,NOR does Paul, but believe exactly what scripture tells us. In Matthew 5 it tells us that Jesus fulfilled the law, it was not abolished. He did what NO other had or ever will. Keep the law perfectly.He was blameless, and His righteousness is imparted to the believer the moment he is born again. What is wicked , is doing the same thing satan did in the garden. Questioning God's council. His word IS the bible from Genesis to Revelation. However if you believe "keeping" the law will save you, then you reject the Messiah AND HIS POWER TO SAVE and place your salvation in YOUR hands, a created living breathing pile of dirt..It is the Spirit that gives life, you are dead till you are born again and BELIEVE on Jesus ..John 3, 6, 10, 1 Peter 1 proves that it is by FAITH that we receive salvation, NOT by keeping the law. You break one, your guilty of breaking all. We are all guilty, without the blood of Jesus we are dead and separated from the Father.
You would do well to STOP listening to others, and go to the Father and seek Him in prayer with a humble and sincere heart... Here ends the lesson..
@I8UB4UCY Love the insults bring em on son. They insulted my Savior, we can expect the same from the ungodly. By the way, not that you have any respect for people because your too immature to have any, BUT I am a 66 year old man. And my name doesnt end with a y. Yes I was filled by the Holy Spirit but not from a laying on of hands. I was doing intercessory prayer and wham !!!Holy Ghost filled!!! Better than any drug u can find. And you certainly do NOT have the Holy Spirit.. He who has no love doesnt have the Father..ThaTS ALL my time for you sonny... My time is valuable and I dont give it to people who are disrespectful..
I can prove Paul was a liar using his own words. On multiple occasions.
"If by my lie..." Peach brotha preach!
Finally people who quote scripture correctly
True.
Do not think I have come to abolish the law. No, I have come to fulfill it"
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
so what is the proper law the 10 commandments?
@@SeekAfterGod Love the Lord God with all your heart all your soul and all your mind. Love your neighbor as you love yourself in these two laws are all the commandments fulfilled.-Jesus
@Anonymous User Guy “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”
[27] Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
[28] But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
[29] And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
[30] And if thy right hand offend thee, cut if off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
[31] It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:
[32] But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
[33] Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
[34] But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
[35] Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
[36] Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
[37] But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
[38] Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
[39] But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
[40] And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also.
[41] And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
[42] Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
[43] Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
[44] But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
[45] That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
[46] For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
[47] And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
[48] Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
Jesus had to fulfill the law in order to lay down these two commandments which stand above all; to love God and love your neighbor.
@Anonymous User Guy “He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.”
Jesus word is above any man to exist, including Moses
“For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.”
In galatians, his first letter (yes its his first) he said the law was given to Moses by weak and beggarly angels/elemental.
So tell me more about whatever his speaking from both sides of his mouth.
Howbout the law is a curse?
The audacity of Paul to tell the original apostles of Jesus that he, Paul, knew more and knew better than them is astonishing to me. Where is the humility?
He didn't say any of that.
If yr a theologian you should know that the most letters of Paul have a anti-Jewish redaction first in 90 AC and by Marcion in 150 AC.
So if you read carefully the Greek text, you will see two Pauls! Even most letters of Paul are not from Paul espc the Galatians. They use material from Paul and constructed some letters like Galatians which is only the name of a province in nowadays Turkey with Ankara in its center.
Btw a letter is not that long as those which are called letters of Paul. Nobody would listen for more then an hour to a letter. Most letter were short mostly practical and formal. Also the double openings in one chapter is a sign that there are not a genuine letter as is shown in Romans.
Also the the two different styles of Greek in the letters shows the author who has rewritten Paul.
And all those parts who are specific against Jewish law are written in very typical kind of elaborate Greek that Paul didn't use.
Why they did it is also clear. The breakdown of the Jewish community in Jerusalem and the dispute between Jewish Christians and Hellenistic Christians that we already see in Acts got out of control. The later community in Ephesus took over and did rewrite Pauls letters.
The old testament is also called the old covenant. The old covenant was done between God and Abraham and in turn would only apply to Abrahams descendants, the jews. We, the descendants of gentiles never made a covenant like the one between God and Abraham, not even our gentile predecessors.
Paul wasnt in conflict with the early Christians, he was in conflict with early jewish Christians, because they demanded that gentile Christians become jewish, that means circumcism, tradition about food and cleanliness, etc.
In other words you don’t follow Jesus, you follow Paul. Good to know.
@@guitarandrumsAnswer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.
-Proverbs 26, 4+5
@@jonson856 lmao conveniently, you didn’t answer me at all, yet you want to call me the fool.
@@guitarandrums I corinthians 1: 10- 14
@@celiasleigh2805 Lmao. So as a retort to the assertion that you follow Pail and not Jesus, you send me more paul?
A muslim preacher said that our bible is distorted of because of PAUL.
Don't believe the Muslim preacher. Their beliefs were distorted by Muhammed.
Muhammed denied the resurrection, and denied the crucificixion.
@@DRYeisleysCreations God is one mate, don't say 3 . the trinity was established in the 4th century and Paul did the animal sacrifice and shaved his head when he was called to Jeuresalem, why? because he was teaching against the old testament laws, and he did that as repentance to what he did during his preaching to the gentiles. By the way the early Christians didn't believe Jesus was god or that he was crucified.
Clearly Jesus said about the father " that they shall know you (meaning the father) as the only true God" he didn't mention him self
" I by myself can do nothing"
Be reasonable, Jesus said " many will come to me on that day saying Lord,Lord.........................etc." he will tell them depart from me you evil dowers I never knew you
@@mashli10 Wrong. The Trinity was established in the Old Testament.
Remember what God said when he went to design man?
"Let us make man in our own image"
Unitarianism and the idea that Christ wasn't crucified didn't come about until the 4th century, and is a product of Arians and Gnostics who both hated Paul, and was repeated by that even greater heretic and deceiver, Muhammed.
St. Nicolas punched a guy in the face for speaking that heresy and rightfully so, because it goes against all the apostles wrote, not just Paul's.
You saying that the early Christians didn't teach Jesus was crucified or was God incarnate is calling the Bible a liar.
Jesus also said, "before Abraham was, I am" identifying himself with Jehovah God.
The Jews understood this and were ready to stone him for blasphemy.
it was Jesus himself who gave the command to baptize all in the name of the father, the son, and the holy spirit.
@@DRYeisleysCreations
Come on man lets come to a common term between us and worship 1 god and not to associate partners with him.
"Let us make man in our own image" its Hebrew language sir speaking in pleural of respect, the same as Arabic I myself say we. In Arabic its common thing, and the same applies to Hebrew .
what did Jesus said to the Jews ?
The Jews understood this and were ready to stone him for blasphemy. But he told them you are accusing me of blasphemy because I said I am the son of god, when god said about you (the Jews) "ye are gods".
The same applies to the devil " the devil is the god of this world" do you think the devil is god?? No its the language sir, the Hebrew again.
"before Abraham was, I am" what does it mean?? I am?? did he say I am god?? No.
The only trinitirian proof was "3 bare witness in heavens.......................etc" and guess what it wasn't in the early manscripts, it was a fabrication . What does that imply to you? Someone is trying to add verses to change the belief of people.
Jesus said anyone who breaks the law shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven, and who abolished the old testament? it was Paul.
@@mashli10 Elohim is a plural term. There is only 1 God, but he is manifested in 3 parts. The Father, the Son, and The Holy Spirit.
The Trinity is not 3 individuals, but 3 natures of one individual.
Think of water and how it can be liquid, solid, and vapor, or even how a man can be three things at once.
A man can be a father, a son, and a husband while all being one man.
Jesus never rebuked his disciples when they called him the Son of God. Remember, Jesus commended Simon Peter after he called him "The Christ, the son of the living God"
When Jesus said "Before Abraham was, I am" the Jews knew that I am" meant Jehovah. Jesus had just claimed to have known how Abraham reacted having seen him come.
Context, my good fellow, context.
If you met someone who claimed to know the patriarch of your people personally as God knew him despite being only about 30 years old and then suddenly he used one of God's titles (I Am) to refer to himself, wouldn't you think he was either truthful, crazy, or speaking heresy?
That's what Jesus did. No ands, ifs, or buts.
He used one of God's names.
Jesus also said that he was going to die and be raised up again on the third day, but the 4th century Gnostics and that false prophet Muhammed called Jesus a liar.
I hate to break it to ya, you're not talking to some novice here regarding Biblical manuscripts. Tertullian made reference to both the Trinity and the Johannine Comma in the 2nd Century AD, within the first 100 years after the New Testament was completed.
The claim that the Trinity was a later addition to Christian doctrine is considerably debunked by history.
There are other places in the Bible that allude to the Trinity, such as Isaiah 48.
The chapter starts out with God speaking very similar to Jesus in the Book of Revelation where he calls himself the First and the Last. Later in verses 17-18, God says Jehovah God and his spirit had sent him.
Also, the writers of the gospels make several references to passages referring to God.
Jesus also said he came to fulfill the law., in other words, be the only one good enough to fill every precept of the law.
Paul did not contradict Jesus, he contradicted Muhammed.
Regarding Paul and they who misconstrue his teachings... in his Second Epistle, the Apostle Peter says... “Just as in all of his letters he [Paul] spoke about these things, in which are things difficult for the intellect, which those who are without teaching and unstable, pervert, as also the other Scriptures, to their own destruction” 2 Peter 3: 16
For starters, just take a minute or two to absorb everything Peter is saying about Paul in the aforementioned verse. Firstly, he clearly distinguishes Paul as a co-worker in the Ministry, that alone speaks volumes does it not? Secondly, he acknowledges that many followers find Paul’s teachings difficult to understand... why should anything be any different today? And finally, he irrefutably places Paul’s writings on equal par with the “other Scriptures”, undoubtedly referring to The Old Testament.
If you are unsure about where Paul fits in the whole scheme of things pertaining to the Gospel, sincerely ask God for His guidance and with humble-mindedness carefully study the scriptures for testimony of Paul’s authority. God is merciful and will not ignore your plea if you truly seek after Him and His Word. If you choose to snub God in your quest for knowledge, He will simply leave you to your own devices to follow your own foolish counsels and the imaginations of others.
kangarootha AMEN...too difficult for the Learned, but simple enough for small children to comprehend and understand.
Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wisemen shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid. Isaiah 29:14
The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the LORD; and what wisdom is in them? Jer 8:9
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. 1 Cor 3:19
Looking back on what I had written previously there’s another point I would like to make. We who accept Paul’s authority don’t do so just because of the testimony of third parties. We do so because his writing are in absolute perfect harmony with Jesus’ message. If you cannot see this connection your understanding of the Gospel is distorted. If hearing this assertion makes you more angry than concerned, or at least curious, see it as evidence of your flawed understanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Read the Old Testament is what they need to do. Just like Paul was a scholar of.
Paul is wrong. I'll find the real God thanks
@@dadsapp there is belief that Peter didn't write 2nd Peter. He was dead when Paul's letters started circulating.
The Pauline followers who commented here really are in denial, maybe that's because they don't actually know much about their own supposed religion.
@paul c I am a Christian of only a few years reading the Bible for the first time and came here because of the obvious inconsistencies between the words of Christ and those of Paul.
Thats to be expected
@@Bankable2790 so what do you think about Paul's books?
@@johnplain1546 I started speaking with the Father at my church about it
of course, they don't know their 'supposed religion' - what does that even mean... the anti-Christians know Christianity better than Christians... they interpret the assertions of Jesus with all certainty, and~know that Paul knew nothing about Jesus, nor the forsat Christians.... incredible...
In 2nd Peter 3:15 Peter calls him our beloved brother.
That does not make him an apostle.
well he wasn't the anti-christ
J F if you reject Paul's teachings all of your doctrine will be in error.
Jesse: By whose standard? Paul's?? This is circular reasoning. I value Christ's doctrine over Paul's any day. If that makes me in error to Paul's doctrine, then I happily accept that.
J F well if Paul's story is true then it would be from Christ.
Do we throw out the entire new testament?
Is God not capable of protecting his word?
Do we disregard the apostle Peter word as well? Who says to the unlearned is Paul hard to understand to their own destruction?
“And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.”
2 Peter 3:15-17 KJV
All I will say is on The Day Of Judgement All Will See The Truth! And On That Day No One Will Be Able To Repent For Putting Anything or Anyone Before God!
Agreed
Bruh the real teaching of Jesus is in Islam
@@A1.4U yes, peace upon you and all muslims, brother, may Allah forgive us
Ancient Rageedi he made lots ppl atheist
@@A1.4U he made them Christians*
Then why would peter affirm the teachings of paul, in 2 Peter 3:15-16.
Because it is doubtful that the apostle Peter actually wrote that book.
Peter does not affirm, but rather tactfully denies Paul.
@@yasho8927 2 Peter 3:15-16
Keep in mind that the patience of our Lord means salvation, even as our beloved brother Paul has also written to you according to the wisdom given to him. As in all his letters, he writes about these things, in which some things are hard to understand, which the unlearned and unstable distort, as they also do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
How does Peter deny Paul's teachings when he says those who don't understand him distort him to their own destruction? (Which is what you are doing.)
@@timmebee6097 It's in the opening that it was from Peter. Peter may not have been educated and had help from people to write his letters, hence the confusion for textual critics.
Jews are well known for this throughout history.the did it to Christianity and had success. Tried it with Islam and had successfully divided them to Suni and Shia.
If the Jews had accepted Jesus as the Messiah, there would be no Christianity today.
It’s hard to not notice when Paul quotes the Jewish scriptures he often changes them. Take a passage he uses in his writings, then look it up in the Old Testament and compare the two for yourself and see what you come up with.
So what do we do with the Book of Acts? is it all a wash because it promotes Paul? What about the epistles of Peter? He mentions Paul? If we believe Luke wrote Acts do we then also forget the gospel according to Luke? I dont mean to be argumentative, just curious?
These are great questions.
The book of acts is an expose.
Notice how Peter is delivered from jail spiritually by God while Paul appeases ceaser to get out of jail
Jesus did say apostles will do works in his name and still be rejeted
Meaning they will balspheme the spirit, due to non repentance and in turn "i do not know you, deparr..."
Luke was a follower of Paul, not one of the apostles.
@@veronicagrave159 not a single bit of truth in any religion honestly. Throw it all out. Love your neighbor transcends the tribes of the man who tried to murder his own son because the voices in his head told him to.
@@isidoreaerys8745 for some reason this is refreshing to hear. It’s just everything is so contradicting or unclear. Even ppl who know the book may follow its rules but not spread love for a neighbor
jesus came with revelation
not paul
paul says himself the disciples wanted to kill me
why paul himself hunted down the followers of jesus and fed them to lions
the devil did his best act with this character paul ,
'dont worry commit sins
'dont worry forget the law
il sort it all
il get all of you to heaven'
+Rz Khan
l agree with you. Paul taught everyone they go to heaven when in-fact the meek shall inherit the earth Matthew 5:5.
Paul said messiah came then the law was done away with. Thats not true according to Mathew 15:17-19
The word law is not a true. It should be Torah or instructions.
+Rz Khan Idiotic. Learn to read sir.
Paul didnt teach ANY of thatonesense. He NEVER promoted sin either, you two-toned liar. You've never even read the Bible, have you? Clearly you haven't.
+Sami Ahmed you're dead wrong. you're miss-reading the New Testament. Apostle Paul did NOT contradict Jesus. In fact, all agreed with Jesus explicitly.
Please have your facts straight. Entering Holy things demand no deception.
In Christianity, God changes the executioner, and the fanatic and the evil ones into the persecuted, and the loving, and the people who are martyred for Christ. Contrary to other religions. The followers of Paul, are the follows of Christ.
Read the anthum of love by Paul, which no prophet, or poet, or literary men ever written such a sublime message like it in 1 Corinthians 13.and compare it to the father in English, and if you are fair you can see the difference.
Most churches do not teach the true teachings like Matthew 10:8
‘Freely you have received; freely give’; they teach that it is o.k. to reap the financial gifts in exchange of the spiritual gifts and preach the attractive teachings like:
‘And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified’ Romans 8:30
They try to make people feel happy with such attractive teachings in order to receive more donations.
“If we have sown spiritual seed among you, is it too much if we reap a material harvest from you?” 1 Corinthians 9:11.
Most churches do not follow the strict teachings which urge us to obey God as taught by Jesus in Matthew 22:35-40, Luke 10:25-28, Mark 12:28-34, but they prefer the attractive teachings of Paul like
‘We are saved by grace through faith apart from works’ - Ephesians 2:8-9
‘Even when we were dead in sins, we are saved by grace’ - Ephesians 2:5
‘A man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law’ - Romans 3:28
‘A man is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith’ - Galatians 2:16
‘For all who rely on the works of the law are under a curse’ - Galatians 3:10
Most churches do not follow the strict teachings like If your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out and throw it away which is taught by Jesus in Matthew 18:9, Matthew 5:29 and Mark 9:47, but they prefer the attractive teachings of Paul like:
‘God has chosen us before the foundations of the world’ - Ephesians 1:4
‘God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation’ - 2 Thessalonians 2:13
‘For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation’ - 1 Thessalonians 5:9
‘But let me reveal to you a wonderful secret. We will not all die, but we will all be transformed!’ 1 Corinthians 15:51
‘God has saved us and called us’ - 2 Timothy 1:9
‘We have been justified through faith’ - Romans 5:1, Romans 5:9
Most churches believe that Jesus’ death was necessary for the forgiveness of sins.
But Jesus, like all other prophets, taught that we can earn salvation by obedience, repentance, and good deeds to help others.
No human sacrifice is necessary for salvation.
No human bloodshed is necessary for salvation.
No savior should die for the salvation of others; everyone is responsible for his own salvation.
Jesus has also confirmed the same in Matthew 18:21-35, 6:14-15, Mark 11:25-26, Luke 6:35-38, Matthew 19:16-19, Matthew 21:43, and Matthew 25:41-46
When the scribes wanted to support the doctrine of atonement, they have added verses like Matthew 18:11 For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost
The bible footnotes explain that verse Matthew 18:11 was not in the original old scriptures
Hebrews 9:22 “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness” is a misunderstanding of verse Leviticus 17:10-14 which is not about atonement but is about dietary laws. God has clarified that blood in meat is not good for health; that clarification was necessary to the people who did not have advanced medical tools to know that eating the meat with the blood still in it is bad for health
The true word of God is not what is written by the unknown writer of Hebrews; it is what has been taught by Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jesus and the Prophets who taught the forgiveness is possible by obedience, repentance, and prayers
Proverbs 16:6 teaches that “In mercy and truth atonement is provided for iniquity.”
Psalm 69:30-31 teaches that praise worship is better than sacrifice
2 Chronicles 7:14 teaches that forgiveness is obtainable without a blood sacrifice
‘If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin’
Jonah 3 teaches that people are forgiven when they repented and fasted, without offering any sacrifice and without shedding any blood
Proverbs 17:15 states:
‘He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the righteous, both of them alike are an abomination unto God’
That should be considered as a warning to the teachers who promise free salvation to the sinners and who teach that the innocent has been punished on behalf of the sinners
Jesus taught the parable of The Prodigal Son in Luke 15:11-32 to highlight the importance of obedience and repentance as the main prerequisites for salvation
That is the core Christianity teaching as taught in Matthew 7:21 Not every one that said to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which is in heaven
Jesus has confirmed the teachings of the Old Testimony ‘in repentance and obedience is your salvation’ as taught in Isaiah 30:15
In Matthew 25:31-45 Jesus described the final judgment as being based on good works; he clarified that those who obey the law will be saved
Salvation is not based solely on belief and nothing else; salvation is not granted to those who merely profess acceptance of Jesus without performing kind or compassionate deeds
In Luke 13:3 and 13:5, Jesus taught that repentance is necessary for salvation
But unless you repent, you too will all perish
Mark 12:33 teaches: And to love one’s neighbor as himself, is much more than all burnt offerings and sacrifices
What Jesus taught here is not different from the wisdom taught by the old testimony Hosea 6:6
‘For I desire mercy and not sacrifice, And the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings’
That verse teaches us that forgiveness is possible by repentance and obedience; no sacrifice is necessary
Matthew 9:13 teaches that Jesus came to call the sinner to repentance
‘I desire mercy, and not sacrifice, for I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance’
The wrong teachings about original sin, atonement, and salvation by grace without obedience to God’s law were taught by Paul who was not educated by Jesus.
So in 2 Peter by Peters own statement that Paul is one of us this also a lie????
2nd peter has completely different style and education level of writing.. . so yes its a lie atleast that Peter wrote it
2 Peter 2:15-17 is warning readers not to read Paul's circular reasoning as it is headache inducing.
@@ivanfourie I believe Peter wrote it. Both epistles are against Paul from start to finish.
@@Hebrew42Day "Our beloved brother Paul...." why do people hate paul so much? I really dont get it, he preaches that the only escape from our sin is Jesus Christ.
@@michaelb5767 "our beloved brother"
Then Peter goes on to say that Paul's writings (graphe, not scripture) are headache inducing, easily twisted by the unlearned of Torah.
Why do I "hate" Paul? I don't, I hate his teachings which are against Yah's Torah. This is the same thing Peter warns of.
Verse 17, chapter 3 of Peter's second epistle.
You *beware* lest you also fall into the error of the wicked.
Were the wicked (another word for without Torah) keeping Torah, or using Sha'ul to come against Yah's Torah?
Were the wicked guarding His commandments, or using Sha'ul and his false teachings to come against Torah?
There's no way to read this in the Greek as being for Paul. The entire epistle is a treatise against Sha'ul and his grace teachings. Who is the teacher promising liberty without Torah in chapter 2?
Who is the man, telling us wild visions of the Messiah, who never walked with Messiah?
The only escape from sin, is to STOP SINNING.
Jesus never preached that he is a magic cover to make father blind. Paul does, and only Paul does.
As a Christian I’ve always wondered why Jesus would comeback the 2nd time to make Paul as an Apostle. He clearly mentions after his resurrection that he will never be seen again.
Jesus came back another time to convince Peter to witness to Cornelius.
Paul is a liar .
@@Muhammad-pz1bp The Prophet Muhammed is a liar.
@@DRYeisleysCreations you said [ the prophet ] you gave the title prophet to Muhammad which mean he is not a liar , you just refuted your self 😁
@@Muhammad-pz1bp He is a false prophet ;)
Muhammed denied Jesus rose from the dead or was crucified, which is a lie.
Muhammed couldn't even keep all the Suras straight in his head let alone speak a word of prophecy.
There is only one thing I need to know... what channel did this air on??
Can you say "NWO Agenda" boys and girls??
Looks to me like the original size was changed. But why would anyone want to do that? ; )
Shame for these bunch of so called scholars. They are darkened in their mind. If Paul is anti Christ, then there is no Christianity, and no God, and no salvation or eternity. You deny Paul means you deny the cross and the resurrection.
Huh? Are you insane? Denying paul means you're Denying the cross? Nope
WHAAAAT??? I don't even know how to respond to such blasphemy. So you're savior is Paul? In order to be saved one must believe in Paul?? Ummm if all I had were the first four books of the New Testament, it would be enough.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
This proves nothing
It’s only you quoting scripture. Did you just want to participate?
@@benjamingraden9026 Jesus is real u just choose not to believe in him don't you want to know your awesome savor.
@@mirandarogers3595Where in the Scriptures does it say that Christ would rise on the third day? Remember that the only scriptures Paul had were the Old Testament when he wrote that. I dare anyone to find it!
@@mariobethell3731 it says it in the new testament in 1 corinthians is the new testament what are you talking about.
@@benjamingraden9026The whole video is about what's in the scriptures. So, the main commenter referencing and quoting scriptures is very much apt under the circumstances.
Now, I should ask you: do you just feel like participating, even if you'll be saying rubbish?
I live in Alexandria Egypt. The disciple Mark, one of the authors of the gospel of Christ, brought Christianity here to Alexandria, built a church, and was buried under that church after being killed. At NO time did any of this church denounce the apostle Paul as anti Christ or any such thing. In fact he is, and was always, a respected church elder and called by Christ Jesus, and like Christ and mark, martyred for his faith and testimony. What has your faith cost you to judge this man Paul. The state of this church was very truly described as "a bloody stump of it's early years". Satan is always hard at work weakening "victory thru the blood of the Lamb and the Word of (our) testimony", by taking us back to the old law and crucifying Christ again. Better recheck your idea of what an "anti Christ" is.
+Luke Abdu Zeid
_"The disciple Mark, one of the authors of the gospel of Christ,"_
Oh dear, you have a lot of reading up to do.
_"At NO time did any of this church denounce the apostle Paul as anti Christ or any such thing. "_
How do you know this? Can you refer to *any* writings by your church about Paul from the 1st century? Oh, that's right, you can't. Like all other branches of Christianity, you're completely blind to the period and get all your information from a much later period, after the religious cleansings within Christianity were completed.
_"and like Christ and mark, martyred for his faith and testimony."_
There's no evidence of any martyrdom - sorry. You're just quoting late Church traditions.
_"What has your faith cost you to judge this man Paul."_
What the fuck? Why would anyone need to sacrifice anything to be able to criticize factual problems with a text? But anyway, given that the martyrdom of the disciples are just made up I'm sure we can make up some stuff for Price as well. Price was executed 3 times by decapitation for his beliefs and rose again after re-assembling himself. I bear witness to this fantastic miracle so Price's opinion about Paul is therefore true - because Price died more times than Paul for his beliefs.
_"Better recheck your idea of what an "anti Christ" is."_
I'd think that a man whose teachings directly contradict those of the gospel Jesus is a snug fit for that concept. Of course, Paul lived much earlier and probably had never heard of any of the teachings put in the mouth of Jesus in the gospels, but that's another story.
Both Jesus and Paul said that the Levitical law was repealed and that the ten commandments still stand. There is no contradiction in the teachings of Jesus and Paul.
Lol, Mark was not a disciple of Jesus
JESUS CHRIST SAID...."IT IS NOT WHAT GOES INTO YOU THAT MAKES YOU UNCLEAN BUT IT'S WHAT COMES OUT OF YOU"
ThatS Paul not Jesus 😭😭
Then why you stop at pork? then dead animals, vultures and all kinds of animals are clean for you.
@@A1.4U its true (Matthew 15: 11-20)
forbidden meats are unclean themselves, "and defile both body and soul
In the book of acts the apostles themselves said not to lay the burden of the law.. which cannot save... on the gentiles..a law they not their fathers could keep. So they left gentile believers with these to follow
Do not fornicate... do not eat blood or the meat of strangled animals... Just read the book of acts. You cannot pick and choose what to believe in the Bible just because you want to appear religious. And to answer that other comment.. commonsense days not to eat roadkill if the Lord doesn't want us to eat strangled animals. Jesus said my yoke is easy and my burden is light. If you wanna throw the burden of the levitical law on yourself when the Bible says to gentiles not to... that is your choice but don't try to say it's what God wants. I know it's hard for people to let go of false beliefs but it's more respectful to admit you are wrong than to double down on your error. That's how I've learned much of what I've learned... by admitting sometimes im wrong. To say Christians are to keep the levitical law is wrong.
"Orthodox" Christianity is ultimately what Paul taught and NOT what Jesus the man himself taught. This is not me saying this is what prominent NT scholars say. Jesus a Jewish man preaching to Jewish people about Jewish law and preparing for coming kingdom of God on earth, yet what does Paul teach? Salvation only through faith in Jesus death and resurrection and not following the law?! Christianity as we know it is invention of Paul. Unbelievable that People still have a hard time to see through this.
You do know that Hitler said the same thing about Paul right? Do you really want to have that on your concsience?
Saturday, Saturn's Day, Saterdag, Samstag, Sambaztac, Σάββατο Day, Shabb'tai Day, Shabtai Day, Shabat Day, Shabbat Day, Sabbath Day, Saturday. Shabb'tai means Saturn in Hebrew. Shabbat is the word used in the ten commandments for the Seventh Day.
The Romans found it strange that the Jews were celebrating their day of rest and prayer on what they considered a malevolent day (Saturn was a malevolent god, and Saturday was considered a bad to to go anywhere). Out of jest, they began calling the Jews' day of rest 'dies Saturni' or 'day of Saturn', and eventually it changed to 'Shabb'tai' for the Hebrew word for saturn.
Paul and his followers began breaking bread in remembrance of Jesus' ressurection on Sunday, as well as continuing to observe the Sabbath on Saturday. Paul, being a Roman and probably aware of the stigma of Saturday gathering, helped the Saturday practice soon fizzle out and it was transferred completely to Sunday.
It's ironic that Sunday is the day of the sun god, who was said to have ressurected every day after dying and traveling through Hades, and Jesus was said to have ressurected on Sunday. Seems to be one of the earliest examples of pagan incorporation for the benefit of peace of mind.
Its all mixed up. The Emperor Constantine changed the Sabboth Day as well. To God be the glory. Its the resurrection itself, not the day.
Here's what I think of Saint Paul - it's next to Minneapolis.
You mean the Apostle Paul?
LOL
15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
2 Peter 3:15-16
Yes do away with pride so as not to see it in paul
Paul is the definition of “if you can’t beat em join em” and then deceive them
Jesus’s divinity is most deceived by John, not Paul. Jesus himself says his kingdom is not of this world, so to say he’s a political reformer is also anti-Scriptural.
To all heretics, read and lament your idiocy:
2nd Epistle of Peter, Chapter 3, verses 15-16:
"...even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; {3:16} As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction".
So if, in your foolishness, reject Paul, by necessity you must also reject Peter and by extension all the Apostles and by further extension Jesus Christ Himself.
This is no endorsement. Read it real slowly.
Paul contradicts Jesus
And you used Paul’s writings which make no sense
Peter is low-key talking bad about Paul and his epistled being "unlearned". Peter was not a fan of Paul
@@MrDonche414 Peter did not call Paul unlearned, he called the people who argued with Paul's writings unlearned
"...which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." This is to anti-Paulines, TBH.
In other words, he's talking about you.
I agree with the point made in this video, but differ on the explanation given. During the time of Jesus, there weren’t any Jewish sects advocating turning away from the law per se, but only varied on doctrine-method, emphasis, strictness, etc,- and otherwise just became lapsed to varying degrees out of preoccupation with other matters of life. So Jesus didn’t say this in Matthew due to a great need to bring Jews back to the law and it’s ordered practices, he made the comment out of a need to defend and protect himself, because many of his actions seemed afoul of the law, harvesting on the sabbath, etc. By making this comment, what seemed peculiar about his own actions could then be attributed to him fulfilling the law, while still stating all are to follow the existing law to the T. Secondly, while Paul was a Jew, he was also a citizen of Rome with all the privileges that brought one. His allegiance was to Rome more than to his Jewish brethren and Rome employed him to wipe out the followers of Jesus (going by the name of Saul at this time) which he proceeded to do always with a Roman contingent attached to his company. After his vision and becoming a follower of Jesus himself, then “Paul” had trouble with the Jewish clergy because he wanted to relax the law’s requirements (circumcision for one) for gentiles wishing to become Jews of the Jesus sect (calling themselves Christians came later than the occurrences of this time). This is what brought about the friction and eventual separation causing the two distinct faiths to emerge. But it wasn’t because Paul was trying to convince Jews not of the Jesus sect that J was the messiah and couldn’t that he turned to the gentiles, as stated in your video, because Paul was converting gentiles from his start as an “apostle” but as said, the break came when Paul started converting gentiles without making them follow the law’s requirements in order to do so. So when the split came, the “Christians” became made-up of primarily gentiles henceforth. Under Paul’s leadership an entirely Jewish sect, where it’s central figure Jesus himself stated there was to be no wavering from the stated law, the Tora, became completely co-opted by gentiles, which perverted the true message of Jesus into something other. Paul was the first to come in his name (J’s) as “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.”
This is something I'll research, but these commentators don't appear to have read the whole of the new testament.
What you say is not from Scripture. Where did you get your story from?
@@gracewright8038 Well did it sound like I was quoting scripture? No. This is from historical research from many different scholars and sources knowledgeable of the subject
@@randstrickfaden4148 I need to check more, but Paul's teaching aligns with Christ's teachings super well in my mind. He didn't self contradict like Mohammed or Joseph Smith. At the moment, I'm quite sure he was an apostle of Christ and my favorite Biblical author. He was the apostle to the gentiles.
@@travissharon1536 Not really. Jesus taught one needed to follow the “Golden Rule” in all respects. To be loving of the Father and to humankind. To be merciful, forgiving, giving, sharing, etc, and when failing to do so, truly repent before God for your error and vow to do better. That is the recipe for God’s kingdom here on earth. And this is how you gain entry to heaven and everlasting life. Jesus said, he came not to change the law (the Tora) but to complete it, by saying God is not a spiteful God but a loving, merciful, good God. And also one should be too, use greater common sense when following the law-if your lamb falls in the well on Saturday, the sabbath, don’t wait till Sunday to pull it up dead, but go immediately to try and save its life. If the grain is ripe for harvesting on Saturday, don’t wait till Sunday after the wind has thrashed the field bare. “God made the sabbath for man not man for the sabbath.” So, the day of rest can be interrupted by circumstances that demand immediate attention. And, with those completions by Jesus, he said, that not even a smidge of the law shall not be followed. That means males to be circumcised on the right day, for one, dietary rules be followed, and many more requirements be followed.
But here comes Paul, preaching that only having faith in God, and Jesus as being the messiah the Jews were on the lookout for, was enough to gain salvation. Sure, it’s good to do all that nice stuff Jesus talked about but not necessary compared only to your faith. He was wanting to convert gentiles too, and they weren’t too keen on having to be circumcised, or having to follow other parts of the law either, so Paul started converting them anyway and having them attend his Jewish sect, as it was at that time. He and Jesus’ brother James the Just, in charge of the Jesus movement in Jerusalem after the crucifixion were at odds over this, as James said it was not in accord with what was required for one to join the Jesus sect. Other Jewish sects did not approve either nor think they should be allowed to worship with them, as they’d strayed so far from the law. So, Paul caused the breakaway and the Jesus movement henceforth practiced contrary to how Jesus said they were to. Then later, and as the Christian church developed, salvation comes through faith in Christ (Jesus) and by accepting he died on the cross for all humankind’s sin as the ultimate sacrifice. Odd, as Jesus when alive preached against the sacrifice of living beings, as they are innocent and not fodder for such a purpose. And the rituals the church chose, such as the sacrament, were taken from other already existing pagan ones, such as Mithraism. In fact they took the date of December 25th, which was the highest day of worship in Mithraism, to be Jesus’ birthday. Why? Most likely because it made it easier to convert them to Christianity if they could still hold on to their old customs to a large extent. The Church, especially Roman Catholic Church, has done this all over the World to gain converts, that is, co-opt many pagan and otherwise non Christian customs and means of worship and showing reverence into their litany of practices.
So, Travis, I’m afraid Paul did contradict what Jesus taught and called for, and the Christianity that came to be is “Pauline Christianity” which, is primarily based on tenants different than what Jesus actually taught and called for. Sorry to break it to you.
these people are not spiritually blind.
When Jesus came to fulfill the law he was referring to the Covenant between God and Sons of Jacob that if they kept their end of the bargain he would bless them and give them a nation and one day bring about a Messiah. It was not referring to the ceremonial or dietary laws.
Paul was stoned, flogged, imprisoned, shipwrecked and much more, all for a lie? Even Peter. The apostles and descriptions used in revelations (which was written after Paul), all agree with Paul and his writtens. Even him preaching to the gentiles salvation based on faith, not works.
It is an interesting concept to claim Paul as a false apostle, but under scrutiny it doesn't hold any water.
How do you know Paul went through all those things? Because he says so? Why did he teach that the followers of Jesus should not obey the Commandments? Why would a man of God teach that?
Not a single scholars would attest to anything you just said. Also, he have corroborating data that suggest Paul actually did suffer persecution, just as non biblical sources tell us.
-mic drop-
@@iConquis4Christ
ALL Christians suffer persecution! So what? Examine all the things Paul said logically and rationally. They don't make any sense because he made most of it up! Listen to: "The Biggest Lie - The life of the Apostle Paul with Kenneth Humphreys."
Jesus healed on the Sabbath. He also technically practiced necromancy (Lazarus). He also forgave sin and minimised the importance of what you eat. All direct violations of the mosaic law, but He says that it is all ok because it is out of love, and since Jesus never sinned, therefore He never went against the Law.
This can only mean one thing, that the mosaic law we see in in the OT, is law written by men, and that there is a true, higher, God given Law which derives automatically from the practice of Love (as Paul concludes also) and it is this Law that Jesus refers to in Matthew, not the mosaic law. Just think also how elegant it is that God has inscribed His Laws in our hearts, all we have to do is practice Love to know it, it's within everyone's reach, no priests, no education, no understanding needed, only the will to Love.
@Aajonus Online amen brother
@@siddislikesgoogle Beautifully said! These types of videos seem to do much more harm than help.
Jesus makes it sound like the old testament was not just written by men
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr you mean the people quoting Jesus. Jesus never wrote anything himself. What we have are the records of other peoples attestation of what Jesus said. To what degree of accuracy Christs original meaning or wording has been faithfully preserved is.... debatable.
Any thoughts on the issue of Christ not following OT laws yet being resurrected (because that at least, is true, or no Chrstian would be born again)
@@siddislikesgoogle
Luke 14:3 And Jesus answering spake unto the lawyers and Pharisees, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?
4 And they held their peace. And he took him, and healed him, and let him go;
5 And answered them, saying, Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the sabbath day?
6 And they could not answer him again to these things.
John 7:23
If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day?
Jesus is a higher law that supercedes the old testament I think.
Whoever reads this I hope as a Muslim, that god will guide you all to straight path brothers and sisters.
I am a muslim. I also love Jesus as a Messenger of ALLAH. If I do not believe Jesus, I can’t stay in islam. But I believe him as a Messenger of ALLAH. He came and honored Mohammed. He will come again because his followers misunderstood him as God so he will come to atone for his followers.And this is the only eternal truth because it is not about me, it is about the Holy Quran and the Bible. According to the Holy Quran and the Bible, he will come again to correct the mistakes of his followers.
@Rebecca mohr you give many explain, I believe one day you will also be muslim….when truth come, false will destroy
@Rebecca mohr IF YOU DONT BELIEVE PAULS,THEN HOW DO YOU BELIEVE BIBLE OR CHRISTIAN AND STILL IN THE CHRISTIAN?.....1 SHOULD YOU KNOW,IF PAULS IS FALSE APOSTLE(LIKE JESUS SAY,ONLY 12 DISCIPLES AND NOT 13@14)THEN HOW DO YOU STILL BELIEVE BIBLE AND CHRISTIAN,IF JESUS WORDS ABOUT PRAY(HIS TEACHING)PRAY TO FATHER!!!!....AS I DO,DO YOU DO SAME LIKE JESUS(MATTHEW 26:39),JOHN 7:16-17,JESUS ANSWERED,"MY TEACHING IS NOT MY OWN,IT COMES FROM ONE(GOD)WHO HAS SENT ME.(JESUS ALSO HAS GOD)LIKE HE SAY TO HIS DISCIPLES,"I GO TO MY FATHER(GOD),AND YOUR FATHER(GOD),MY GOD AND YOUR GOD"...IT CLEAR BY JESUS,NOW WHAT IS YOU REALLY BELIEVE,IF PAULS IS FALSE,THE BIBLE IS WRONG TOO..IF YOU WANT TO FOLLOW JESUS WORDS,LOOK AT FIRST MY COMMENT ABOUT PRAY,IF THIS YOU FAILED MEAN FOREVER YOU ARE SLEEP LIKE YOUR ANCESTORS..
@Rebecca mohr
Jesus MUST remain in heaven UNTIL *The Prophet* who is foretold in the scriptures, to come after Jesus, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon them both) has arrived and delivered his message of *all truth* to the people. Only after that can Jesus return.
ACTS 3
20 Then times of refreshment will come from the presence of the Lord, and he will again send you Jesus, your appointed Messiah. 21 *For he (Jesus) must remain in heaven until the time for the final restoration of all things, as God promised long ago through his holy prophets* . 22 Moses said, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from among your own people. Listen carefully to everything he tells you.’23 Then Moses said, ‘Anyone who will not listen to that Prophet will be completely cut off from God’s people.’
My wish is that you accept in you heart Jesus Christ God resurrected king 👑 messiah and be guided by him
This is based on a misunderstanding of Paul’s theology. Paul wasn’t erasing the law. He basically said that we don’t need to follow the letter of the law, but we do still need to follow the SPIRIT of the law, which is Love. He writes in Galatians 5:14,
“The whole law is fulfilled in one word: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’”
Paul isn't the antiChrist. Paul was a legitimate leader of the ministry who helped keep the original teachings of Jesus in the Gentile world.
I'm not surprised why you all are arguing whether he's legit or not, because it's the rise of ROME that gave the priests power over religion during the Persecution of the gentile Church of Christ (the reign of Emperor Nero).
The persecution and death of the Last apostles in the gentile churches gave the Roman priests the chance to Claim the throne and Adopt Christianity (by the way, Catholics invented this term...Paul and the others didn't call themselves "Christians" per se, but the followers of "the way" which Romans thought was a SECT of JUDAISM). And so whenever WE think of Christianity, we think about the ANTI-CHRIST, the Iglesia Apostolica Romana (Iglesia católica apostólica romana) who teaches that JESUS is GOD. They teach the wrong Jesus and adopted Paganistic rituals and beliefs and incorporated it into "Christianity" which then TAINTED the NAME of CHRIST up to the modern era.
Think about these before you all trip yourselves to your own destruction.
jesus said , this after God said what not to eat. Matthew 15:11 11What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but what comes out of their mouth, that is what defiles them."
Mark 7:18-20 18"Are you so dull?" he asked. "Don't you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? 19For it doesn't go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body." (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.) 20He went on: "What comes out of a person is what defiles them.
Matthew 15:18 18But the things that come out of a person's mouth come from the heart, and these defile them.
this is more on how christ said opposite to what God stated .
Matthew 5:38-39 38Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: 39But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
@@itstheotherwhitemeat ?
@@yodelrekishi i agree with you. and jesus did change laws.
@@itstheotherwhitemeat 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
If paul was false we lose most of the new testament.
Also, how could he cast out evil spirits,and raise the dead.
They will say to me in heavan "We have cast out demons and preformed many wonders in your name" to them I will say "Depart from me, I never knew you, he who practices lawlessbess!" -Jesus on sermon on the mount according to Matthew
why did peter john and james agree with him then?
those his followers who he told made books agreeing with him
@@crackedtv2195 so you're calling john and james followers of paul? even though paul went to THEM to get approval for what he was saying and doing?
@@Xenotypal yes
@@Xenotypal paul wrote the 2nd peter too
@@crackedtv2195 what has made you come ot this conclusion?
I don't agree with anything on this video except for one thing: If people practiced Christian ethics, the world would be better for all. Unfortunately, Christians have mostly failed at this, but I don't believe in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Jesus is the human race's only HOPE. And some Christian authors, including Ron Sider and Lucien Bracquemont (an autistic Christian author from Maine) have sought to address this. The Gospel is simultaneously eternal, personal, and social. Each Christian is called to imitate the virtues of Jesus. While we are justified by God's grace (thank God), we should show our appreciation to our Savior by loving all our neighbors as ourselves for what God has done for us through Christ. Bracquemont has discovered in one of the later epistles of the New Testament the Great Charter of Social Justice and equality, and it is not what most activists preach. It is very counter-cultural! Liberals claim that the Bible is "culturally conditioned," but guess what? All of us, including the liberals, are culturally conditioned!
The Apostles: * Existing for three decades after Jesus and spreading the Gospel.
Paul: Hey guys, I'm totally just like you because Jesus spoke to me on a road and told me so !
Matthew 7:21" Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father (GOD)which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity".
You want to know why?Because you did not followed what Jesus preaches.Jesus said ONE God, but you said trinity.
Also true. Paulites are their own religion.
@@tonewilhelmsen2425 Anti-paulites are Nazis.
@@DRYeisleysCreations oh it's better than that, Paul does not preach in his own name, he preaches Christ crucified. These clowns are antichrist 🕊
John 10.30 The Father and I are one.”
31 Once again the people picked up stones to kill him. 32 Jesus said, “At my Father’s direction I have done many good works. For which one are you going to stone me?”
33 They replied, “We’re stoning you not for any good work, but for blasphemy! You, a mere man, claim to be God.”
34 Jesus replied, “It is written in your own Scriptures that God said to certain leaders of the people, ‘I say, you are gods!’ 35 And you know that the Scriptures cannot be altered. So if those people who received God’s message were called ‘gods,’ 36 why do you call it blasphemy when I say, ‘I am the Son of God’? After all, the Father set me apart and sent me into the world. 37 Don’t believe me unless I carry out my Father’s work. 38 But if I do his work, believe in the evidence of the miraculous works I have done, even if you don’t believe me. Then you will know and understand that the Father is in me, and I am in the Father.”
@@peskymogwai7742 none of these verses made Jesus god none he neither claimed to be god this is all assumptions
Hiya all you Seekers of Truth out there, I want to address an important word. The word is apostle, it is defined as one who is sent out, (like go away, get lost). Most people get that confused with Disciple. The Messiah said if you follow and obey my words, then you are my disciples. So who wants to be an apostle. This word was inserted purposely and used to confuse us. God is not the author of confusion.
Paul meant, when he was speaking about being saved not by the law, about the 10 lost tribes, who were reconciled by the blood of Jesus while they nolonger kept the law. In the new covevnant the law is writen on the hearts and not in the letter. So there is no difference in those who kept the law and those who nolonger kept the law. The 10 tribes were concindered to be gentiles ( among the nations). The problem with the Paul deniers is that they keep to the Roman Catholic teachings of heaven and hell. Thats where the confusion comes from.
What does “fulfilling” the law mean?
No, re: jot and tittle Jesus was criticizing the Pharisees for being so exact with their laws and judgment, he was encouraging them to open up, to lose their hardness of heart.
Exactly
"However, if it's from God, you won't be able to stop them. You may even discover that you're fighting against God.""
@Black Hole the god of abraham never had any covenant with muhammad. muhammad was a false prophet he received a revelation from a spirit not from god. all the prophets of god receives revelations fromp god directly. islam is of the devil and this video is a fraud: jesus allowed all foods as clean in mark 7 and chyanged severals laws from the torah in the gospel such as prohibiting stonning read the texts by yourself
@@godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 he changed them?
@@godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 Did you even read the Quran? Islam is the only logical option when compared with other religions, hence why handreds if not thousands of people are converting everyday.
@@khaledmerzouk6110 islam from satan follow satan i follow god.
@@godhasgivenussalvationinth5223 you Are So So Stupid.MUHAMMAD(PBUH) WAS NEVER EVER a ***** prophet At All AND THE GOD ALMIGHTY OF PROPHET Abraham(PBUH) NEVER EVER had covenant with Is ONLY a Stupid claim you made.MUHAMMAD(PBUH) TRUELY HAD A COVENANT WITH THE GOD ALMIGHTY OF PROPHET Abraham(PBUH).THAT IS WHY MUHAMMAD(PBUH) IS NEVER EVER a ***** prophet AND IS ONLY A TRUE PROPHET. MUHAMMAD(PBUH) IS THE NEXT PROPHET TOLD BY PROPHET Jesus christ(PBUH) WHO WOULD COME AFTER HIM.it is The Biggest Lie That PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) GOT HOLY REVELATION FROM some spirit AND NOT GOD ALMIGHTY.PRIPGET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) GOT THE HOLY REVELATION FROM GOD ALMIGHTY ONLY.PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) GOT THE HOLY REVELATIONS REVEALED TO HIM BY THE HOLIEST ANGEL Gabriel(PBUH).EVEN THE PROPHETS(PBUT) WHO GOT HOLY REVELATIONS FROM GOD ALMIGHTY ALSO GOT IT FROM THE HOLIEST ANGEL Gabriel(PBUH).SO PROPHET MUHAMMAD(PBUH) IS THE LAST ONE TO GET THE HOLY REVELATION FROM GOD ALMIGHTY.STOP believing in the Biggest Stupid Lie that ISLAM from the *****s.ISLAM IS NEVER EVER from the *****s At All.No Other Religion HAS THE TRUTHS LIKE HOW ISLAM HAS THE TRUTHS.Stop believing this Video is A fraud.THIS Video Is NOT a fraud At All.you people are still insisting to believe in the Big Big Lies of paul.it is paul who is the Big Big fraud.THIS VIDEO IS A TRUTH.This Video SHOWS how paul is A Big Big Liar and Is NOT an apostle Of Anybody At All.paul made up Big Big Lies Only.it is paul who changed the laws.PROPHET Jesus christ(PBUH) NEVER EVER changed Any LAWS that were there before HIS TIME.That is Only A Big Big Lie.PROPHET Jesus christ(PBUH) NEVER EVER told all foods As clean.All The ANIMALS That Does NOT Have TWO SPLIT HOOFS DIVIDED INTO TWO AND THAT CHEW CUD ARE NOT clean for eating For Anybody. PROPHET Jesus christ(PBUH) NEVER EVER changed Any Laws At All BUT ONLY CAME TO DO OUT ALL THAT LAWS.THE LAW GOD ALMIGHTY GAVE TO PROPHET Moses(PBUH)'S People IS ALSO THE LAW TO BE FOLLOWED BY PROPHET Jesus christ(PBUH)'S People.THAT IS IT.
Jesus also never taught us to renounce our families or friends or homes. He never renounced his own family. The Synoptic Gospels claim that he taught us to renounce everything we have, but in reality he never did such a thing. Renunciation never had a place in Judaism, nor was it a decree in Judaism. Judaism never condemns TV shows, movies, video games, or comic books and graphic novels containing depictions of sin. Psalms 101: 3 only warns us against pursuing idolatry, not watching images of sin in pop culture. Every story needs depictions of good vs evil and depictions of sin so it can be entertaining and in the end good triumphs over evil. Isaiah 65: 22 makes it clear that we will enjoy the works of our hands which includes TV, movies, video games, social media, comic books and graphic novels, music of any kind, and YHWH does not condemn them for containing depictions of sin, since they show that in the end good wins over evil.
The Apostle Paul wrote about the "man of lawlessness" in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-12. The man of lawlessness represents the pinnacle of what Christ reverses and is appropriately referred to as "Antichrist". Paul's description of the Antichrist in 2 Thessalonians warns Christians to avoid deception. Many scholars believe that the person referred to by Paul as “the man of lawlessness” in 2 Thessalonians 2 is the same person or phenomenon referred to by John as “the antichrist”. Both figures fulfill a pattern that originates in the Book of Daniel and that reappears in John’s vision.
Paul's prophetic outline in 2 Thessalonians 2 is mandatory to view against the background of Daniel's original prophecy of the Anti-Messiah. Jerome wrote: "Says the apostle [Paul in the Second Epistle to the Thessalonians], 'Unless the Roman Empire should first be desolated, and antichrist proceed, Christ will not come.'" He also identifies the little horn of Daniel 7:8... scholars believe that this passage contains no genuine prediction, but represents a speculation of Paul's own, based on his knowledge both of Daniel and contemporary events.
St. Paul was identified with Antichrist by Jews because he preached against their religion
This is a big bunch of fallacies and purposeful misunderstandings. Paul did NOT say we don't have to obey the law, but that THE MEANS OF SALVATION is by grace through faith, not by works / obedience to the law. Also, to say Jesus was a political figure and NOT GOD characterizes you as an ANTICHRIST and FALSE PROPHET from the Father of Lies. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also." (1 John 2:22-23)
glad you posted.....
James 2:14-24 contradicts that theory
_Paul did NOT say we don't have to obey the law_
Really? Paul said that the Law kills, also said that he is not under the Law, also said it's not important what day one observes. Also he fraudulently called Torah an öld testament". No, in essence, Paul was a satanic preacher of lawlessness
We are made new in Christ, would it make sense that we are in the same state as unsaved Jews of old? No it would not. The Holy Spirit is the answer to lawlessness, *not* simple admonitions from one man to another.
_We are made new in Christ, would it make sense that we are in the same state as unsaved Jews of old?_
You are made new ONLY IF YOU REPENT AND SIN NO MORE, that was the Gospel. Otherwise you are of devil. After Jesus' resurrection, John said this *the one who sins is of devil* and *sin is lawlessness*. So you see, if you sin, you are of devil, not new in Christ. And sin is when you break the Law, the unique Law of your creator.
just realized, John the most loved lost his clothes while escaping and paul was the young boy who held the clothes for those who slew Stephen, the first martyr. Wow.
LOL No he wasn't !!!
Stephan is made up by Paul, "Stephan" was in fact James, one of the twelve, the first matyr.
@@theOldestCraze Please tell me more! Very interested. Heard it before, but forgot where! :)
@@tonewilhelmsen2425 m.ruclips.net/video/JA1qWIH2aBg/видео.html
Now this guy knows about Paul and this video is about James "Stephan," but he has totally thrown Christianity out with the Saul bath water. But he does good reporting if you can tolerate the Gnostic stuff he also preaches. I have not watched it yet, myself, so please excuse me if he speaks on something else beside "Stephan" being Paul.
Now thats what you call a real revelation.😊
If this is true, why did Jesus say to abandon your parents to follow him? The 2nd commandment would clearly contradict this. I'm a Paul Skeptic, and this argument couldn't even convince me.
UUmm You know that Jesus spoke in parables and metaphorically, correct?
He said to love Him more than anything or anyone; that's the point.
Where do you come up with the claim that Jesus died “long before Paul” as you stated @4:04 when he did all his work before the fall of Rome in 70 A.D.?
This is why I always say that the appropriate name for Christianity should be Paulianity.
A lot of people (including Christians) don't realize that the book of Mark was written BEFORE the book of Matthew. The book of Matthew contains the sermon on the mount speech, but the book of Mark doesn't. Also, the books Matthew and Luke very heavily depend on the gospel of Mark. Just my opinion, but I find it very problematic that Mark (the first Gospel) didn't include the sermon on the mount speech because if it indeed happened, it would have been an important event that should have been documented in Mark as well. If Mark was indeed written around 65 - 70AD and Matthew was written in the 80's AD, why did people have to wait so long for an anonymous author to document that part of the oral tradition (sermon on the mount)? Unlike many Christians, I have to ask myself questions about this stuff. Jesus supposedly died around 33AD. The Gospel of Matthew was probably written somewhere around 80-85AD. The sermon on the mount was more than likely a story that had been told through oral tradition for about 50 years until someone finally wrote it down. We all know that undocumented stories told by word of mouth change over time. My guess is that if the sermon on the mount speech really did occur, I'm almost certain that the story we have in Matthew doesn't perfectly match up with what really occurred. I mean, if someone has actually taken good notes on the life of Jesus while he was actually living, I don't think that the person would have waited 50 years to finally decide to write a piece on Jesus' life!!!
I find much about the Gospels troubling, but many Christians will ignore what I find troubling. The gospel of Mark ends abruptly with the women being at the empty tomb and telling no one about what they saw. The alternate ending to Mark (16 : 9 - 20) that doesn't leave the reader puzzled started showing up centuries later. It was a scribal addition. The earliest available manuscripts of John don't include the passage about the adulterous woman in John 8 : 1 - 11. It was a scribal addition. Here is my question people. If we know that there were scribal additions that were added in and could not have come from the original authors, isn't it highly possible that a lot of the material in our Bibles is stuff that was just flat out made up? Why do people assume that that everything about the Bible is so honest and pure? Matthew 27 : 52 - 53 speaks of dead saints coming up out of their graves and going into Jerusalem for many people to see. Did that actually happen, was it a lie or is it possible that the author didn't expect people to take him literally? Matthew also mentions the resurrection and ascension. Did that actually happen, was it a lie or is it possible that the author didn't expect people to take that literally either?
The fact remains that Christians are basically forced to worship an entity (Jesus) who was written about first by a person (Paul) who only came to know about Jesus from a supposed vision. How many other historical figures can you think of other than Jesus, who were recorded into history where we first get to know about them in spirit and then many years later, anonymous people finally decide to write about their actual lives? Jesus may have very well existed, but I seriously doubt that all we know about him is 100% accurate.
+Sean Grimes One thing you seem to be missing here is that documents prior to Paul's letters and the Gospel According to Mark existed. It is likely that many were lost in the Siege of Jerusalem 70 AD. Any surviving that did not agree with the agenda of the Catholic Church would have been destroyed, if they turned up before the Reformation. What's important is to Do unto others, love your neighbor, forgive your enemies, put your effort into improving yourself not your possessions. Other gospels have been recovered and you can read them online.
+Nonya Damnbusiness I've heard of the Q Gospel that would have predated Mark, but its existence is pretty much hypothetical. From the research I've done, Paul is the first person we know of to write anything about Jesus. I can tell you one surviving document that was rejected by the catholic church though. it was called the Didache. The Didache is supposedly a guide of teachings as told by the 12 apostles. If you read chapter 1 of the Didache, it pretty much states EXACTLY what you stated above.
www.gnosis.org/library/didache.html
Sean Grimes If you haven't already, look up Nag Hammadi texts. A 1945 find of mostly Gnostic documents from Eqypt hidden from the Church of Rome in the fourth century. I'm fond of the Gospel of Thomas.
+Nonya Damnbusiness I've also looked into other Gospels. I've researched some of them, but have not read them yet.
Here is something I learned that is very interesting though. I'm sure you know that the KJV of the Bible was completed in 1611. The New Testament of the KJV was built upon a work put together by Erasmus in the 16th century. Erasmus' editions were only based off of a few manuscripts that he had access to at that time which was somewhere around 10 or so manuscripts. Erasmus' edition became know as the Textus Repceptus (TR). Here is where things get a little shaky. Since 1611, MANY more Greek manuscripts have been found. The total number is somewhere around 5600 altogether. That's a lot more than what Erasmus had access to. Erasmus' TR contains certain passages that were not found in many of the older Greek manuscripts. For example, Mark 16 : 9 - 20, John 7 : 53 and John 8 : 1 - 11 are not in the earlier manuscripts (those are the only verses I can remember right now). If you have a NIV Bible, you'll notice that those verses are italicized or footnoted to indicate what I just stated. This pretty much makes us all aware that the Bibles we have do not say exactly what the original authors may have said. Our Bibles are highly accurate, but because scribes had to do the tedious job of hand copying these manuscripts for many, many years, a lot of changes (some big and some small) did make their way into our Bibles. It would be nice if a find of manuscripts from the middle of the 1st century were discovered. I really doubt that will ever happen though.
+Sean Grimes I think Jesus left it this way on purpose. There is no specific walk that one can read about. The details are different for everyone. He calls us all then sets our path. Or vice Versa, Idk? He also said "I have more to teach you but you are not ready yet". Leads me to believe that the Bible is a starting point to understanding the Messiah. He perfects your faith as you go. I've learned to trust him. Idk about Paul. I'm going with what Jesus said. Looks like I'm reading the Torah again.
Paul never said get rid of the laws. His message was the works of the law no longer justify a man only Jesus does. Very simple.
Dispensationalist theology will clear up any confusion.
What do people read/study then, if not the New Testament?
Without law there's chaos.
Love fulfils the law, Paul advocated.
@@mosestwinkle7922 But at the same time, the same paul had no problem with Christians eating food sacrificed to idols and he claimed that food does not bring us near to God in 1 Corinthians 8 verses 1 to 8. I exposed the fraud nature of Paul in my video on Paul.
The old law says no pork and shellfish etc... but doesn't Jesus say that anything that goes in your stomach cannot defile you? Is saying that means food laws have changed since Jesus a wrong interpretation? Can somebody offer something else? Thanks.
Which is more likely - that a man ran around feeding thousands, raising the dead, healing the blind and floating to the sky (and Paul or any commentator never noticed) or that these tales evolved over the decades. I've always thought it odd that Paul never mentions a virgin birth, baptism, miracle, teaching or event yet knew the disciples.
Paul never referenced Jesus' teachings, either.
@@vanessamontes8951 Church goers get a tale. The gospels - contradictions and all - are combined. Paul's actual letters are equated with forged ones. Acts (100 AD) is taken as historical despite numerous dating errors and contradictions of Paul's own words. Mary Magdalene was a prostitute, there were 3 wise men and the trinity is in the Bible. LOL
@@smb123211 where does it say she's a prostitute?
@@tulip811 It doesn't - that's my point. It's one of those things that has become part of the tale - like 3 wise men or eating an apple or the big fish being a whale or Paul's images of Jesus being real vs a vision.
Peter talks about Paul in Peter 2
2 Peter 3:15-16
"Bear in mind that our Lord’s patiencemeans salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction."
@noachianff
2 Peter is a well known FORGERY in the name of Peter.
@@faisalsiraj9423 so does ur Quran and no Christian disagree on 2 Peter, it's not a well known forgery we have ECF referencing Paul
@@faisalsiraj9423 well known by muslims? They reject even the four gospels, why is this one any different?
@@faisalsiraj9423 Known forgery..? that's pathetic.. Peter clearly supports paul and basicly disproves everything this stupid video is trying to teach; Yes, just say FORGERY on anything that is not suiting your agenda... so lame.
@@I--May--I
*BY THE FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM*
Thanks to Saul aka Paul the Feroci0us W0LF in SHEEP'S clothing whom Jesus WARNED about, it's Christians 🚩 AGAINST Jesus Christ till the end of times.
1)
✔️ Jesus: THE FATHER IS THE ONLY TRUE GOD.
✖️ Christians: NO. The Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit (The Trinity) is the true God.
2)
✔️Jesus: NO payment needed, NO Jesus died for us. Just repent sincerely and the Merciful God (THE ONLY TRUE GOD - THE FATHER) forgives.
✖️ Christians: NO. Salvation comes by the blood of Jesus and his dying on the cross
3)
✔️ Jesus: Keep the Laws and the commandments if you want eternal life
✖️ Christians: NO. Eternal life comes by faith in the sacrifice of Jesus
4)
✔️ Jesus: Do NOT neglect even the smallest laws
✖️ Christians: NO. Those laws are unimportant
5)
✔️ Jesus: I was sent ONLY for the lost sheep of Israel
✖️ Christians: NO. Jesus came for us all, Jesus came for all of mankind
Who are all these "early Christians" that "didn't agree with Paul?" 6:20
Ebionites
Bill Sturm 😂
@Truther 4 Christ No. Stop lying. Greek was not language of Yahoshowa. There is no religion called Christianity. You are deceived from day one. Paul, the anti-christ, doomed the generations of so called 'Christians'. Repent and get back to Most High.
The early followers of the disciples.
They kept the commandments.
And believed jesus was the Messiah.
According to the gospel of James held in bethlehem, jesus was the servant of God
the ebionites
At the end of this video the man says "critically if anyone wanted to be a true advocate of Jesus he would be a jew". Now in the year 2021 For the most part the Jews to this day reject Jesus so what are you talking about?
Anyone that see contradictions in the Bible...doesn't know the Bible nor believes it or God.
There is a war in the new testament.
Every epistle is an expose on Paul. The gospel of john written against his heresy.
Once you see it, it's incredible.
Can u give an example?
The only war is by evildoers from without trying to cast doubt on what's within.
They'd rather learn from Gnostics(who denied Jesus and Paul), Muslims (who deny Jesus's execution), and Hitler (who claimed Paul hijacked Christianity and that Jesus was an Aryan)
Oh Paul, need no worry many gentiles of modern era love you
Saul of Tarsus, and how his influence is so ingrained in the religion, has always bothered me. Something has always nagged at me about it and I really think it's just intuition. Intuition that something just isn't right about the man. I feel like he hijacked the Way and I REALLY don't want to think that, but 🤷🏻♂️.. that nagging concern has never left me.
God's Word says that in the last days men and women will not accept sound doctrine and will rather accept a doctrine which will "scratch" their itchy ears...... A doctrine of men.
If you don't accept ALL that is taught in God's Word ( whether written by Paul or Peter )that means you are either an immature(young)believer or a non believer.
God's Word teaches us that He is NOT a God of confusion, that ALL scripture is God inspired and that we are not to add or remove any of what has been written in His Word. For a man to say that Paul is a false teacher is meaning that God doesn't know what He is doing. God's Word on many occasions says that Paul was an Apostle, chosen by God to do His work. Saul met Christ on the road to Damascus and was changed/ born again and Paul knew at that moment that God is real and therefore put his faith in God.The problem lies within mens understanding of God's Truth.
Without receiving revalation ( which is what Saul received)when reading God's Word would be like reading the news paper. Trying to understand God's Word with an intellectual mind will get you nowhere. We need to be born again/ changed with the mind of Christ and a heart of God.
That's why the Jews didn't see the promised land......their hearts didn't change and they kept in the stubborn ways and each one of that generation fell dead in the wilderness but two.
I have failed to see where Jesus commanded that I read/follow Paul.
Here’s what Jesus said
He commanded his disciples to make disciples in ALL nations, to be baptized, and to observe ALL that he commanded.
Matthew 18:18-20
I can’t find one single scripture where Paul taught the commands of Jesus.
Do what you like but I’m following Jesus
@@williamcarr3976 well, if you are truly following Jesus as you claim to be , then you would be following Paul aswell. Scripture teaches us this. It's not good to pick and choose verses from the Bible which please you. It's ALL or nothing
John 14:15
John 15:10 If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
Orland Alcasid your Yahweh, who isn’t even mentioned by that name ONCE in the New Testament that you ONLY follow, never came for you Gentiles!!! He said it himself
That he came ONLY for the lost sheep of Israel. He ain’t your messiah or savior or god. Accept it, it’s written in that book you call a bible.
@@edbtzkhud Galatians 3: …27 "For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise.…"
Kim Westwood are you a follower of Jesus or Paul?? I ask you this because you know and I know that Paul said those words not Jesus. Paul was not the son of God nor was he a Prophet. Matter of fact he taught the exact opposite of Jesus. He’s the one that included the gentiles not Jesus. Remember when Jesus said I came not to change the law but fulfill it? What law was he talking about? If you think you know then tell me. He was fulfilling the Mosaic law that applied to JEWS not people like you. Do you keep the Sabbath? No you don’t, do you avoid eating swine? No you don’t, GEEE I wonder why, maybe it’s because you follow Paul’s ways not Jesus’ Jesus said for all men to be circumcised, do all gentiles get circumcised? No they don’t. I wonder why, maybe it’s because Paul said you don’t have to even though the HYPOCRITE had Timothy circumsized supposedly because his mother was a Jew. See? You are true followers of Paul not Jesus, you preach the words of Paul not Jesus. You people are truly LOST
@@edbtzkhud Those who want to keep the law and reject the promise of salvation by grace want to exclude Paul and 2 thirds of cannonized scripture . Peter called Paul a BELOVED BROTHER. Paul preached Christ CRUCIFIED all throughout the NT...I can tell you exactly how Jesus fulfilled the law and the purpose for it...Jesus fulfilled ALL the OT laws knowing full well nobody COULD nor will they ever. We are all guilty , not just the Jewish people. We are all lawbreakers. We are liars, sexually immoral, slanderers, blasphemers, murderers...WE ARE WRETCHES...We are reconciled to the Father only by the cross and the blood of the Lamb sealed by the Holy Spirit ( 1 Peter 1) . He was blameless, and the born again believer with a new spirit is blameless ( 1 John 3) . I have the Holy Spirit alive in me testifying that I am an adopted son . I dont need any confirmation from a man about my position with the Father. So sling those arrows old buddy. Insult me !!! I love it praise God!!!! ...John 3 specifically tells us Jesus died to take away the sins of the WHOLE world. All nations, tribes, tongues will stand before the Father ( Revelation) All who come to Him, repent and obey the gospel will never perish. John 3, 6, 10 and 1 Peter 1 gives council to the one time event of salvation and its permanence... Whatever book written by a man that planted the ideas in you to refute Paul as an apostle is just the work of the anti christ. Satan ' MO hasnt changed since the garden when he challenged God's word. He's busy , twisting, deceiving, and lying and he knows his time is very short....Jesus will come again, separating His children from the sinners.. Heres the deal my man, opinions, beliefs never change the truth..You can continue to try and refute Paul and reject most of the NT, but a day of reckoning will come and Yeshua our King will set everything straight.
@@edbtzkhud By the way, I am saved because of the Holy Spirit opening my eyes to see I was a sinner, and needed a Savior. I am a believer sealed by the Holy Spirit .. so NO I am not a follower of Paul. From your words you are obviously either by birth Israelite or you were told by a false teacher you are an Israelite. We do not inherit the promise in the flesh, you must be born again ( John 6)... Revelations 7:9 reveals the people standing before the throne of the Almighty..And no I dont eat pork. Whatever
It's crazy how y'all believe in Phillipians 4:13 but deny Philippians 4:9 when Paul talks about prosperity you scream amen to the top of your voices when He condemns wrong he becames antichrist? I am starting to think you also think hell is a lie soon you may start saying the whole Bible is false .This is why I don't let people teach me about the Bible I read it myself...anyway May God's mercy and grace be with you and most importantly may Jesus show you the truth
Exactly, they're all just a bunch of religious fanatics who are dying to prove that they're right and the rest of the people are wrong, its nothing but utter folly, we should all focus on Jesus, and on him only for salvation.
a little leaven
Bible is completely!
@@D-Paramountcy then read the words of Christ. They are diametrically opposed to Paul’s
@@Bankable2790 ever heard of dispensationalism? I suggest you look it up, it doesnt complicate anything, and if you're a work based based Catholic then I'm sorry cause your church considers him a saint, also that same church has a Pope that condones and allows same sex marriage, and he's supposed to be Jesus's representative? Last but not least, Paul wrote half of the new testament, therefore proving he was ordained. He preached pure Jesus, and wasnt trying to get rid of works, it may look that way, but he was just trying to get believers to stop depending on their works for salvation but put 100% faith in Christ Jesus for salvation
"With the
rabbinical impudence that characterizes everything about him, Paul put this interpretation, this perversion of an interpretation into a logical form: 'if Christ did not rise from the dead, then our faith is in vain'. -And in one fell swoop, the evangel becomes the most contemptible of all unfulfillable promises, the outrageous doctrine of personal immortality ... Paul himself still taught it as a reward!" NIETZSCHE, "The Anti-Christ"
The best is Paul's invention of the Rapture in "his" letter to the Thessalonians to calm the Christians who were told Jesus was coming back "before this generation shall pass away" and they're dying and he has not come back:
13But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. 14For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep.15For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep.16For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.17Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. 18Therefore encourage one another with these words.
-1 Thessalonians 4:13-18
This was a real problem for early Christians - where is he?? Christians of every generation constantly think the End Times are right around the corner but for the first Christians it was far more serious. Just change the facts! Another favorite... time is just redefined, a "day" is really "a thousand years":
7 But the heavens and the earth which now are, by the same Word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the Day of Judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing: that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
9 The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
2 Peter 3:7-9
Was Abraham justified by the written law alone (or) by faith alone ?
@I8UB4UCY Romans 3:21-31 !!! Please read 3:28 again & again & again !!! Genesis : 15:6, Galatians 3:6, Romans 4:3 & James 2:23 !!! Yes. Truly, I am a vile sinner than the one mentioned in St. Luke 18:13 & a perfect hypocrite as you have mentioned. !!! Salvation is by His mercy alone, by His grace alone, by His faith alone, by His Scriptures alone, by The Blessed Lord Jesus Christ alone & for the glory of The Blessed Holy Trinitarian God of The Holy Bible alone !!! Ephesians 2:8-10, Titus 3:3-9, & Psalm 106:8 !!! Salvation is The Blessed Holy Trinitarian God’s “gift” which can “Never” be “earned” !!! Of course “NOT” by “Works of the Law” !!!
@I8UB4UCY If you could perform God’s written Law, why The Blessed Lord Jesus Christ of The Holy Bible died on the cross and rose again on the third day as prophesied & written in The Holy Bible ???
@I8UB4UCY I believe entire Holy Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 as The Word of God of The Holy Bible. But, you have stated clearly that you do not believe in half of the New Testament saying The Great Blessed Apostle St. Paul as Anti-Christ !!! 2 Corinthians 6:14 !!!
@I8UB4UCY 1 Corinthians 2:14 !!! Please read in between Proverbs in 14: verses 16&17 !!!
@I8UB4UCY Thank you very much for your blessings !!! The Blessed Holy Trinitarian God of The Holy Bible bless you !!!
so this religion what we all know is Jesus religion is actually Paul religion. interesting
You're a muslim, you (msulims) always rant against Paul, so that's indeed interesting...
So much hatred on Paul proves he truly lived for Christ and gained by dying for His name. He indeed was NOT a people-pleaser just like his Master Jesus. A true follower of Christ indeed.
Dear Servant Michael, do you love satan? If not, then you prove he truly lived in Christ according to your let's say "logic".
+emanuel e, what foolishness is this that you speak? I HATE the devil and his demons. However way you decide to interpet my statement is upon you.
Servant Michael That's your "logic", sweetie. Not mine. Rather lack of logic.
2 Peter 3:15-16 King James Version (KJV)
15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
That's right
They stil call Paul a false one but do they even understand the writings?of Paul?
It seems that this video stated that Paul don't have any choice but to go to the gentiles ?
Hmmm
Where does the apostle Paul say that we do not have to obey the Law? Paul says the Law is good. The problem was that man in his sinful nature and condition could not keep the Law, therefore it became a minister of condemnation and death to those under the Law. Christ died to redeem us from under the curse of a broken Law. God now approaches man on the principle of Grace received by Faith. Grace is a ministration of righteousness to the believing sinner. Not only that but it is the righteousness of God. 2 Corinthians ch. 5 v 21. To say that the apostle Paul was antichrist is so ridiculous it is stupid. Before his conversion he most certainly was, but afterwards he was ordained by the glorified Jesus Christ to be the preacher to the Gentiles. It is no wonder the Jews hated him and still do. The preaching of the gospel of grace put their noses out of joint and showed them that their special relationship was interrupted until the gentile church was drawn in by the Holy Spirit of God. It did exactly what the prophet said it would, made the Jew jealous, so much that they crucified the Lord of glory and rejected their Messiah.
dude. Paul showed up 10 years after the messiah was gone. why? were the 12 apostles screwing up so bad? what were they doing wrong that they needed this scumbag? How badly did the messiah screw up training his 12? Paul says in Philippians 2:7 that Jesus came in the “likeness of men”. Paul claims in Romans 8:3 that Jesus came in the “likeness of sinful flesh.” 1st John says anyone who says that Christ came in something other than flesh is of the spirit of antichrist. This is known in theology as the doctrine of docetism. Why is Paul excused for teaching this doctrine?
This is so interesting.
Then explain this
Romans 3:31 King James Version (KJV)
31 Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law
@Black Hole
His wisdom and knowledge is what solves these "riddles".. second...
The holy spirit is a great at revealing what most are ignorant/ arrogant to
It’s not. It’s heresy
@Black Hole you are preaching to the choir when you talk about the false apostle Paul! Paul taught a different Jesus, he taught a different gospel! You lose me when you talk about Muahamid, this man was NEVER mentioned anywhere in the bible! Mahamid was just another Paul sent to destroy the Islamic faith! He was special and heard from Allah himself and didn't haveto follow the teachings in the quaran.
@Black Hole you lose me when you claim that Paul wrote 80% of the new testament, less than 1/3 was written by Paul, 2/3 of it have absolutely nothing to do with Paul! Get you're facts straight if you want to reach readers of the bible, you can make you're point by simply saying Paul wrote over 1/3 of the new testament, maybe half if you throw in Luke and Mark.
I thought Jesus had burnt brown skin and woolly hair and Paul looked like a ancient Egyptian
But did he walk like an Eqyptian?
@@williamkarle976 ...😆
"
"I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.". ~ Jesus John 5:43
To the enemies of the most high God and His own, to those who are trying to figure God out through their human brains, forgetting that Jesus hid Himself and His teaching from the Pharisees and anyone who doesn't have the heart for God, He said in Luke 8:10 "The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, SO THAT" though seeing, they may not see, though hearing , they may not understand".
" 15 Bear in mind that the patience of our Lord means salvation-just as our dearly loved brother Paul also wrote to you with the wisdom given to him. 16 He speaks about these matters in all of his letters. Some things in them are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist (as they also do with the rest of the Scriptures)-to their own destruction."
2 Peter 3:15-16
You people are borderline heretics. Here you can clearly see that Peter gives full approval to Paul. smh
Sean Hammer Amen!!!
You think that is an endorsement? Keep reading as Peter warns about that lawless one. Unstable and uneducated people cannit read Paul and ger confused an endorsement?
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of the lawless(paul) and fall from your secure position.
Here is why Paul calls paul brother.
38 “Teacher,” said John, “we saw someone driving out demons in your name and we told him to stop, because he was not one of us.”39 “Do not stop him,” Jesus said. “For no one who does a miracle in my name can in the next moment say anything bad about me, Mark 9.
I'm in no way confused. You think that was reproof? Paul's writings are beyond your understanding because you fail to see Christ or the Holy Spirit in the Tanakh. Paul saw Jesus on the road to Damascus, and his understanding allowed Him to see that Jesus was exactly who he said he was. Read the Law and the Prophets. Then read them again. I pray you see Christ on your own road to Damascus.
@@edwardhunga4488 sorry but no he NEVER saw Jesus . he assumed.,perhaps deceived. perhaps he was just crazy. Jesus clearly stated that he was not spirit, "Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have."