💡Get The Crystal-Clear Guide To Reach 2000+ ELO Rating Faster . Join the FREE Masterclass ► chess-teacher.com/masterclass 💲Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
► Chapters 00:00 King's Gambit Counter For Black 00:53 Black loses in the most played line 02:43 King's Gambit Accepted: Bonsch-Osmolovsky Variation 04:56 1) White plays 5.exd5 07:57 2) White plays 6.Bc4 11:16 3) White plays 5.e5
The problem with facing the King's Gambit is that you face it so rarely. I've tried learning lines for the counter-gambit, but have always forgotten them by the time I see the opening on the board. 😂
@@NormalKid84do you got some program for that where u just check moves instantly with engine, i think if i will know and use this its just easy 2000+ elo to get
@@NormalKid84 I literally just said that doesn't work well. I have to play lines repeatedly and frequently to really understand them - that's when they ingrain. Some people have good rote memory, others have stronger conceptual memory. I'm in the second demographic.
That's the issue not only with responding to the king's gambit but a zillion other dubious gambits that arise after double king pawn openings. That's why I recommend to play something else in short time controls. In slow games, sure you can try to challenge their prep, but in fast time controls defending is practically impossible or almost.
As a Kings Gambit player I always play Bishop to C4 first after gambit is accepted cos it’s rare and very sharp, I develop the other Knight later on. It’s nice to know an opening and have it counter, Great way to learn makes it more flexible
Usually the Falkbeer is hard to play against as it sort of constantly baits white to make the wrong move while blacks plan is pretty straight forward. At least for amateurs like me.
I like to play a variation off the Kings Gambit Accepted called the Breyer Gambit. Basically it goes e4 e5 f4 exf4 (Kings Gambit Accepted) then instead of bringing the knight to f3, you place the Queen there. Here's the theory.... Gambits aren't meant to be the definitive way the chess game should have logically gone. Its meant to give an advantage. Usually that means seizing a very strong initiative, or superior tactical positions. In this one, its meant to play on the tyoe of player the opponent is. If the are very safe, they try to develop without trading, then castle queenside (since my Queen is hovering on his kingside). Depending how black plays, there are some 4ply traps that he can fall into....or he could save it. But a good gambit should provide the opportunity for some hard to see traps.
King's Gambit is my go-to for white. While I don't know much of the theory on it, I do very, very well with it. But I have encountered a few defenses against it which threw me for a loop. Igor, this video is perfect timing as I wanted to look up some defences against it to play the opening even better.
Is there ever an explanation of black going queen h4 immediately… seems that’s the most common move but never even mentioned. Is it an obvious trap and blunder?
7:45 what about knight to a3 to defend against the royal fork square? I know they can take the bishop and you lose castle rights, but is there someting even worse or is it a manageable position?
A hundred years ago when I was an active player I used to play 2… B-B4 (that’s 2… BC5 for you young whipper snappers). I’m pretty sure Igor is familiar with it. Solid, Trappy and irritating as hell for the white player who was undoubtedly dreaming of a powerful swashbuckling attack.
I am old, too. The Bishop gambit was Bronstein's recommendation. Now using the computer, John Shaw has refuted it. But chances are near nil that you meet an opponent who has 1) read that refutation 2) understood it 3) still remember the moves. So it is pretty uninteresting which gambits are proven incorrect, as long as it isn't crap like the Englund gambit. When it comes to the King's gambit, everyone should know that it's a high risk venture for both sides. I refuse to be at the receiving end of it; i.e. I don't play 1...e5, no P-K4 as black.
2...Bc5 is The Classical Declined and is as old as the KG itself. I have only been aware of the Falkbeer. The most trappy lines in the Classical seem most fun. If white is annoyed by these, he or she is no King's gambiteer. Perhaps better play the London, as Shaw writes.
Of course nobody as white should choose the king's gambit without reading John Shaw's book. Ne7 d4 d5 Nc3 de Ne4 Nd5 and among a bunch of other fun we could have Bd3 Be7 c4 Bb4 Kf1
Thank you for sharing your strategy for binary options trading with. It's inspiring to hear that you've been able to achieve a daily income of $300 as a beginner. Your success is a testament to the effectiveness of your strategy, and I'm sure it will be helpful to many others who are just starting out in binary options trading. Thank you again for sharing your knowledge, and I hope you continue to see great results!
![Punish 1.d4 With The King's Indian Defense [Key ATTACKING Ideas]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rJ8LqYZZvnc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Punish 1.d4 With The King's Indian Defense [Key ATTACKING Ideas]](/img/tr.png)
💡Get The Crystal-Clear Guide To Reach 2000+ ELO Rating Faster
. Join the FREE Masterclass ► chess-teacher.com/masterclass
💲Join the RCA Affiliate Program, promote our courses, and get 50% commission - chess-teacher.com/partnership/
► Chapters
00:00 King's Gambit Counter For Black
00:53 Black loses in the most played line
02:43 King's Gambit Accepted: Bonsch-Osmolovsky Variation
04:56 1) White plays 5.exd5
07:57 2) White plays 6.Bc4
11:16 3) White plays 5.e5
The problem with facing the King's Gambit is that you face it so rarely. I've tried learning lines for the counter-gambit, but have always forgotten them by the time I see the opening on the board. 😂
I somehow face it often enough to get demolished everytime
Practice & learn on analysis board you'll learn/memorise it
@@NormalKid84do you got some program for that where u just check moves instantly with engine, i think if i will know and use this its just easy 2000+ elo to get
@@NormalKid84 I literally just said that doesn't work well. I have to play lines repeatedly and frequently to really understand them - that's when they ingrain. Some people have good rote memory, others have stronger conceptual memory. I'm in the second demographic.
That's the issue not only with responding to the king's gambit but a zillion other dubious gambits that arise after double king pawn openings. That's why I recommend to play something else in short time controls. In slow games, sure you can try to challenge their prep, but in fast time controls defending is practically impossible or almost.
As a Kings Gambit player I always play Bishop to C4 first after gambit is accepted cos it’s rare and very sharp, I develop the other Knight later on. It’s nice to know an opening and have it counter, Great way to learn makes it more flexible
Finally a chess teacher that is interesting and fun to learn from. Excellent.
Usually the Falkbeer is hard to play against as it sort of constantly baits white to make the wrong move while blacks plan is pretty straight forward. At least for amateurs like me.
This is amazing GM Igor Smirnov! I didn't think we can really punish this opening so much! Thank you so much!
I have found nimzovich Marshall counter gambit and pickler gambit so effective against kings gambit.
Love your videos, Igor! Thank you
Masterful tks bro Shalum!
I like to play a variation off the Kings Gambit Accepted called the Breyer Gambit.
Basically it goes e4 e5 f4 exf4 (Kings Gambit Accepted) then instead of bringing the knight to f3, you place the Queen there.
Here's the theory....
Gambits aren't meant to be the definitive way the chess game should have logically gone. Its meant to give an advantage. Usually that means seizing a very strong initiative, or superior tactical positions.
In this one, its meant to play on the tyoe of player the opponent is. If the are very safe, they try to develop without trading, then castle queenside (since my Queen is hovering on his kingside).
Depending how black plays, there are some 4ply traps that he can fall into....or he could save it.
But a good gambit should provide the opportunity for some hard to see traps.
I much prefer Naroditsky's 2. ... c6 recommendation. He also takes a deep dive into the Schallopp defense.
the bots are faster than the speed of light.
I would like a video about the schalloopp defense
King's Gambit is my go-to for white. While I don't know much of the theory on it, I do very, very well with it. But I have encountered a few defenses against it which threw me for a loop. Igor, this video is perfect timing as I wanted to look up some defences against it to play the opening even better.
🆙✅Great video!! Some of the lines are akin to the 2...d5 3.exd5 exf4 4.Nf3 Nf6 lines!! 🆙✅
I've never met the Kings gambit but I'll make sure to keep this in mind
Best gambit
How did a 15 minute video end so quickly
I understand how some GMs have gone insane.
Interesting line, I will keep that in mind when I would be bored of the pickler gambit
Is there ever an explanation of black going queen h4 immediately… seems that’s the most common move but never even mentioned. Is it an obvious trap and blunder?
7:45 what about knight to a3 to defend against the royal fork square?
I know they can take the bishop and you lose castle rights, but is there someting even worse or is it a manageable position?
at the conclusion : after .......Nf3 (double)+; Kh1 why not ....Bxh2 ? If Bx(Q)d1, Nx (Q) b6 and I think White is equal ?
Im reminded of the amazing game between anand and morozevich
This is the rarest and coolest trap ever.🙂
I am playing it next time.😃
I played Falkbeer counter gambit from your old vedio and destroyed my opponent in 8moves😅
Igor rules
1:58 the best is just Qg7 😂
good
A hundred years ago when I was an active player I used to play 2… B-B4 (that’s 2… BC5 for you young whipper snappers). I’m pretty sure Igor is familiar with it. Solid, Trappy and irritating as hell for the white player who was undoubtedly dreaming of a powerful swashbuckling attack.
I am old, too. The Bishop gambit was Bronstein's recommendation. Now using the computer, John Shaw has refuted it. But chances are near nil that you meet an opponent who has 1) read that refutation 2) understood it 3) still remember the moves. So it is pretty uninteresting which gambits are proven incorrect, as long as it isn't crap like the Englund gambit. When it comes to the King's gambit, everyone should know that it's a high risk venture for both sides. I refuse to be at the receiving end of it; i.e. I don't play 1...e5, no P-K4 as black.
I am going to check out that 2...Bc5. Looks annoying, yes.
2...Bc5 is The Classical Declined and is as old as the KG itself. I have only been aware of the Falkbeer. The most trappy lines in the Classical seem most fun. If white is annoyed by these, he or she is no King's gambiteer. Perhaps better play the London, as Shaw writes.
My board start from left side to right, your board start from right to left
I would've fallen for a all of these traps lol...also what in the hell is up with the bots
15:02 what if bxh2?
The rook! 😮
You never analised the merits of Barnes Hammerschlag opening.
Of course nobody as white should choose the king's gambit without reading John Shaw's book. Ne7 d4 d5 Nc3 de Ne4 Nd5 and among a bunch of other fun we could have Bd3 Be7 c4 Bb4 Kf1
Thank you for sharing your strategy for binary options trading with. It's inspiring to hear that you've been able to achieve a daily income of $300 as a beginner. Your success is a testament to the effectiveness of your strategy, and I'm sure it will be helpful to many others who are just starting out in binary options trading. Thank you again for sharing your knowledge, and I hope you continue to see great results!
For a kings gambit like myself I appreciate learning what to do against the counter attack
Winning in 6 moves is definitely misleading.
Tf you want checkmate ?
💯
🎉
the goat
big fan
😎
Where's today's puzzle?
It’s too bad you don’t respond to emails. Not very good customer service