That last part was cool, but my working was the reverse. I took logs of both quantities and rearranged so that I was now comparing ln(e)/e with ln(pi)/pi, justifying each step as I was applying an increasing function each time, preserving the inequality. Idk how you'd set out that sort of working out though, I used a question mark symbol, as I didn't know what the inequality was. Maybe a or symbol?
Awesome video - Very clearly explained! I hope you are able to post more videos like these! They are very useful. I have a maths channel too, it would mean a lot if you could show some support too!
This was very helpful, please make more!!!!
12:33 that was such an elegant way to prove it. None of the nitty gritty, trial and error. Great vid!!
More please! Enjoyed it
Fantastic video man! we need more of these!
awesome stuff. please make more of these
I'm gonna have a physic a interview but this was sum still very useful
thank you! subscribed!
what a lovely video! super helpful tyvm!
This was really helpful!
That last part was cool, but my working was the reverse. I took logs of both quantities and rearranged so that I was now comparing ln(e)/e with ln(pi)/pi, justifying each step as I was applying an increasing function each time, preserving the inequality. Idk how you'd set out that sort of working out though, I used a question mark symbol, as I didn't know what the inequality was. Maybe a or symbol?
These are really helpful
how can we justify that ln(x) increases more slowly than by how much 1/x decreases, other than by just judging from their graphs?
where to find the interview questions
based
Awesome video - Very clearly explained! I hope you are able to post more videos like these! They are very useful.
I have a maths channel too, it would mean a lot if you could show some support too!
do u do zoom mock interviews i’m fucked🤣
How did it go?