The Ultimate Weapon Smashing Russia Behind Enemy Lines

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024

Комментарии • 998

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot Год назад +209

    Attack 'ums sounds like something I'd buy a bag of at a gas station.

    • @ericdpeerik3928
      @ericdpeerik3928 Год назад +14

      Sounds more like what you drop in the toilet bowl after eating at the gas station

    • @ericquarles9333
      @ericquarles9333 Год назад +6

      Say that 5 times fast... while drunk.

    • @jackslagle2019
      @jackslagle2019 Год назад +3

      Right. It reminds me of Tony Stark selling those bombs in the first Iron Man

    • @terrellstandefer6646
      @terrellstandefer6646 Год назад +4

      I've been laughing every time this guy says it, how can he not laugh at this! I can't wait until we give them the jizams hahaha! Y'all figure out what that stands for, I have no idea.

    • @prillewitz
      @prillewitz Год назад

      Warning: Too much Attackums can raise your blood pressure.

  • @andie_pants
    @andie_pants Год назад +201

    _"...the use of ATACMS skyrocketed."_
    I see what you did there.

  • @MrDDiRusso
    @MrDDiRusso Год назад +67

    The use of ATACM's skyrocketed.
    🤯

  • @hansericsson7058
    @hansericsson7058 Год назад +19

    If you attack a country and strike it with crusemissiles, against most urban areas(both civilian and millitary). You have no right to set any Red lines in your own country. Slava Ukraina💛💙

    • @bijaysahoo4039
      @bijaysahoo4039 Год назад +5

      Are you thankful to west and U.S creating another Afganistan out of a beautiful country ?

    • @christopherdukes2425
      @christopherdukes2425 Год назад +4

      ​@@bijaysahoo4039 you can't be serious or did you mean Russia????

    • @bijaysahoo4039
      @bijaysahoo4039 Год назад +3

      @@christopherdukes2425 what I mean is very clear, you need to read carefully. There was no problem between Russia and Ukraine, Expansion of NATO was a problem. What if Russia deploys its Nuke in Cuba ? War can't considered good at any cost. But US war complex is always hungry to make money out of human life. Vietnam, Korea, Libya, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Afganistan list is really long... It's all about business and making money for U.S nothing else.

    • @robertpatrick3350
      @robertpatrick3350 Год назад

      @@bijaysahoo4039 😂 Afghanistan is a basket case because of Russia….. they set it on the course it’s on now……

    • @manh9105
      @manh9105 Год назад +3

      Zelinsky fanboys don't get it

  • @Braddeman
    @Braddeman Год назад +24

    MLRS when you don’t want that grid square to exist any more. I use to love watching them fire their whole pods. I was in the m109a6 paladin but we were always in the field together.

    • @jonnyqwst
      @jonnyqwst Год назад +3

      I was 13M many years. Probably saw you in graf

    • @tapio83
      @tapio83 Год назад +1

      "see that grid square?" "yes sir" "i don't want to"

    • @Nathan-xr4gv
      @Nathan-xr4gv Год назад

      Shit broke down every other day when I was serving.

    • @TheJon2442
      @TheJon2442 21 день назад

      ​@@Nathan-xr4gvoperator error?

  • @davidelliott5843
    @davidelliott5843 Год назад +3

    Russia constantly escalates the war and constantly complains about the latest red line. Providing more powerful missiles would simply allow Ukraine to fight back, instead of simply defending itself.

  • @JacobT-1
    @JacobT-1 Год назад +116

    It is so cool and smart they made the front of the launcher look the same with each size of missile. So if anyone was able to peek at them well enough, they wouldn't be able to tell the range of what was being carried.

    • @kiowablue2862
      @kiowablue2862 Год назад +19

      Not just the range, but what's loaded, period. i.e. Is it ATACMS or MLRS?

    • @JacobT-1
      @JacobT-1 Год назад +10

      @@kiowablue2862 You're totally right.

    • @AlexKarasev
      @AlexKarasev Год назад +9

      Everything has value, but there will be a strong temptation to keep these longer range weapons farther back from the front-lines vs vanilla HIMARS, thus telegraphing the increased range capability to the satellite.

    • @oldmech619
      @oldmech619 Год назад +10

      The Ukrainians need to be able to hit the command and control centers as we as pushing back the supply system

    • @MrBen527
      @MrBen527 Год назад +7

      At the same time being cost effective with only one type of cover.

  • @brappy5037
    @brappy5037 Год назад +14

    I LOVE THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

    • @chrisperry9002
      @chrisperry9002 Год назад

      And they love you paying them to dick off on Facebook all day.

    • @andie_pants
      @andie_pants Год назад +3

      Me too!

    • @eugenehong8825
      @eugenehong8825 Год назад

      This video has been endorsed by the Hunter Biden Consortium

    • @openphoto
      @openphoto Год назад +3

      This beats healthcare , especially after a pandemic.

    • @CircaSriYak
      @CircaSriYak Год назад +1

      This but unironically

  • @mjerry3
    @mjerry3 Год назад +49

    I was with 4/27 MLRS in the gulf war and they were pretty impressive from our end. Glad I never got to see the recieving end other than what was left behind. I remember the sonic boom from an ATCM waking us up one night. Scared the crap out of us.

    • @Nirotix
      @Nirotix Год назад

      Don't think anyone would want to be on the receiving end of that. Certainly wouldn't live to talk about it.

    • @andyvonbourske6405
      @andyvonbourske6405 Год назад

      STEEL RAIN !!!

    • @andyvonbourske6405
      @andyvonbourske6405 Год назад

      @@TheMcspreader in training The concussion of firing the older at-4 were so bad there was a limit on how much you could fire in one day . that thing was painful.

    • @SubvertTheState
      @SubvertTheState Год назад

      Well yeah its literally a ballistic missile. I dont really get why the Army wants in on the Ballistic Missile game let alone expose a crew of Joes to such high decibals and shockwaves.

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 Год назад +50

    @9:10 You described the range of the PrSM's as "499 Km". That's an artificial value applied to comply with the limitations imposed by the Interim Ballistic Missile Treaty. Since Russia abrogated that treaty when they fielded the Iskander-M system, the PrSM's range is probably a good bit longer than 499 Km now.

    • @MrDJAK777
      @MrDJAK777 Год назад +9

      Everything points to them being capable of 60km-600/650 km (60km min actually more impressive imo) as originally designed when "limited to

    • @Matlockization
      @Matlockization Год назад +7

      The official range is 499.666 km.

    • @UnratedMadness
      @UnratedMadness Год назад

      Bidens America banned export of fentanyl to Russia last year, calling it "potential weapon". USA is number 2 in use while Russia 67th place. Biden will not benefit nether democracy nor the people of his country. Who is going to ban fentanyl imports to America? ATACMS will bring down inflation by giving people jobs and rescuing Ukraine from a dictators regime. If we do nothing, no innovation nor skillful jobs will exist. Who cares about inflation, if you work so much there is no time to spend the money?

    • @killsudo
      @killsudo Год назад +6

      @@MrDJAK777 They are already discussing a maritime PrSM for the pacific with a 1200km reach along with firing PrSM in volleys off ships via HIMARS. Once the PrSM is in flight, nearby F35s or drones can feed them proper targeting information while performing battle damage assessment. More advanced versions of PrSM seekers call for different optics for transmitting back data onway/before impact or PrSM coordinating at target for assignment or call off/redirect to secondary targets if the first target is destroyed. This will also fit nicely with the F35 package with less missile room but able to coordinate a range of current and next-gen US missiles that can link up with the F35s from air, land, and sea mid flight and have the range to perform operations once reaching the target.

    • @mmadmic
      @mmadmic Год назад +3

      When Army says, it's maximum 499km, it's just to comply with international laws, in fact is not the actual limit, affect the trajectory or the amount of fuel and the range could drastically changes .

  • @YellowJack1020
    @YellowJack1020 Год назад +48

    Also, ATACMS is a undeniably cool sounding name

  • @robinpettit7827
    @robinpettit7827 Год назад +8

    I was actually one of the technical advisors on the navigation and guidance for parts of this and related systems. I was supporting DARPA at the time. It is a very capable system. Obviously, I can't go into details.

  • @voncth5791
    @voncth5791 Год назад +54

    Love this channel! Very high quality content! Keep it up 🤠

    • @kevint1910
      @kevint1910 Год назад

      ...to me this shit has become an obscenity with ignorant fools jacking off over how many dead we have created with these ill considered policies. this is none of our business and never was , the state department never should have over thrown the Ukrainian government 9 years ago and it has just gotten worse from there

    • @nitramnitram1966
      @nitramnitram1966 Год назад

      Apart from every single time he says Army Tactical Missile system or ATACMS.

    • @PomyMagnum
      @PomyMagnum Год назад

      @@teddy.d174 this is not good content. More half the videos put out by the ‘dark’ channels are full of misinformation and straight bullshit. When you actually know a lot about military hardware and watch these channels you just feel embarrassed for them. Their research is incredibly lazy.
      Ukraine does not even have ATACMS and yet the title says they do.

  • @bc-guy852
    @bc-guy852 Год назад +20

    I think there WILL be ATACMS sent to Ukraine - not a lot of them - at $1 Mil each - they are spendy and the GLSDB's are 1/20th the cost and have longer range. But - I do think the US (or other country) WILL send a few ATACMS to the UAF - to ensure the Kerch Bridge remains unable to function enough to use the rail portion. They might have to try more than once - but it has to drop.

    • @bc-guy852
      @bc-guy852 Год назад +1

      @@generaldisarray6488 I don't think so. A few, as I said but mostly GLSDB's. ATACMS are about $1Mil each - and there aren't that many made - nor can they be made in high quantity.

    • @TheHk1966
      @TheHk1966 Год назад +1

      How about sending them whatever leftover Lance missiles are left in warehouses. Couple those with leftover napalm and cluster bombs

    • @tapio83
      @tapio83 Год назад +2

      @@bc-guy852 I bet ATACMS also have shelflife so they could send the ones expiring sooner than later.

    • @bc-guy852
      @bc-guy852 Год назад +1

      @@tapio83 I doubt they have many ATACMS on the shelf. Not sure if they have a 'best before date' (probably decades if so) but for sure - when this is over - ALL of the older tech gear will be shipped and the shelves WILL be refilled with brand new assets.
      Sort of makes one wonder which came first - the need for the bombs and means of destruction - - or the actions requiring a response...??
      But it sure will be good - - for American manufacturing. ALL plants making war-related equipment have all gone to triple-shifts...

    • @tapio83
      @tapio83 Год назад +2

      @@bc-guy852 I have no info on shelf life of these but they are chemically powered rockets&explosives so they do have some set dates. As for numbers, publicly 3700 built, ~500 used in iraq&afghanistan. 650sold (some export numbers not public so +hundredorso). That leaves ~2500 to stock with manufacturing dates starting from ~30 years ago.
      Though some of that 2500 may have been destroyed also due to expiry unless they managed to use the aging stocks in iraq. Exported ones are likely new.
      So I suppose they could send some but number is likely closer to 100 than 1000.

  • @MrEnajiza
    @MrEnajiza Год назад +10

    Glory to the Warriors of Ukraine..SLAVA UKRAINI...Stay strong Ukraine....🇺🇦💪🇦🇺

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ Год назад +2

      @@generaldisarray6488 merc nazis fighting merc commies. Same old story

    • @revolvermaster4939
      @revolvermaster4939 Год назад +1

      It’s just another corrupt communist oligarchy! FUkraine & FJB

  • @jessboswell2581
    @jessboswell2581 Год назад +3

    Ukraine already got enough of our shit

  • @Maddog-xc2zv
    @Maddog-xc2zv Год назад +21

    The ATACMS is to be replaced with Lockheed Martin's Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), also able to be used in the Himars and M270 Platforms with 500km range, plus 200kms than the ATACMS. They call them the ATACMS on steroids.

    • @gardnert1
      @gardnert1 Год назад

      How do YOU know what the actual range is of the ATACMS is?

    • @Maddog-xc2zv
      @Maddog-xc2zv Год назад

      @@gardnert1 I don't. the info provided regarding the ATACMS and PSM are the ones allowed to be shared with the mass public by the providers. If it's real or "top secret", then the errors about their range are not mine but on purpose build up truths acorded by providers and State. The same with everything: jet speeds, thrust vector, submarine speeds, time in water without resurfacing, whatever in the military mainly to maintain confidentiality of a given product: that's one of the reason behind of the why the F-22 was never exported by the US, not even to their closest allies. Otherwise, if uou think especially the military is like a credible open source info source, just visit the official sites and there's a lot of info on their products you can find there: this is not a US policy only, rather used all around the world by every nation able to produce top tier technologic products - or so all say they are...

    • @gardnert1
      @gardnert1 Год назад

      @@Maddog-xc2zv that's a lot of you saying nothing...

    • @Maddog-xc2zv
      @Maddog-xc2zv Год назад

      @@gardnert1 not me, but thanks anyway 😁

    • @john1182
      @john1182 Год назад

      @@gardnert1 you see there is a thing called the internet and on the internet there is a site called wiki and if you search for ATACMS there right on the first page it lists the page as 300km. and remember thats the de clasifid range

  • @travelinman70
    @travelinman70 Год назад +12

    pronouced AAA tack ems.
    I used to be a technician on the MLRS system. very effective and accurate mobile indirect fire.

  • @ElegantMessTechPC
    @ElegantMessTechPC Год назад +55

    I don't think ATACMS will be sent to Ukraine for a couple reasons, extremely high cost of over $1 million a shot & low stock being the two big ones. But on the bright side it seems that Ukraine may have gotten the first batch of the GLSDB's which have a range of ~150k if I remember. A video covering the GLSDB's from SAAB & Boeing would be really cool

    • @joshschneider9766
      @joshschneider9766 Год назад +5

      Google it, its already been promised as well as higher range himars ammo.

    • @drtmi8789
      @drtmi8789 Год назад

      So you're a NAZI?

    • @perkunast9680
      @perkunast9680 Год назад +5

      The GLSDB has a low power warhead. Its not much good at taking out high priority targets like bridges. Also150k is not exactly long range

    • @ericdpeerik3928
      @ericdpeerik3928 Год назад +3

      Which would explain how they hit Mariupol. That's approximately a 150km shot

    • @EmmEff3168
      @EmmEff3168 Год назад +5

      Actually, the problem with taking out some priority targets is warhead power. GLSDB and HIMARS GMLRS warheads are 250 lb class and M48/Harpoon is 500 lb, takes far too many for something like the Kerch strait rail bridge. Need to start at 1000 lb, so we'll see.

  • @Skyrunner13
    @Skyrunner13 Год назад +4

    Scary. I think all protagonists should be made to watch this. It might just shorten some wars.

  • @xandersnyder7214
    @xandersnyder7214 Год назад +1

    Do you see that grid square?
    Yes sir.
    I don't want to anymore.

  • @Ejvid04
    @Ejvid04 Год назад +9

    When did Ukraine get these? Last I checked the USA has not OKd them.

    • @jimhollywood2763
      @jimhollywood2763 Год назад

      All warfare is based on deception. So what we think we know is controlled. We deployed HARM missiles without announcing them. Hopefully when these are used there is still denial that they exist.

    • @mingming9604
      @mingming9604 Год назад +1

      yes, this video is definitely deceiving!

    • @TheDrage123
      @TheDrage123 Год назад +1

      They havent recieve that, but there are rumors they got the glsdb for the MLRSs we gave them.

  • @troysurrett7317
    @troysurrett7317 Год назад +31

    When will Dark learn that "Mk 4" is spoken "Mark Four" not "Emm-Kay Four"?

    • @Will-W
      @Will-W Год назад +8

      He won't, he's either chosen to completely ignore the common use or it's a bot reading a script.
      Still worth watching either way, but I'm going to go with never.

    • @Unb3arablePain
      @Unb3arablePain Год назад +2

      "7.62 caliber" is also a favorite of mine.

    • @Nobodyfromnowhere42
      @Nobodyfromnowhere42 Год назад +3

      "Mark" is the US way of saying it , the rest of the world uses Mk.

    • @joshuaboudreau5258
      @joshuaboudreau5258 Год назад

      Right?

    • @ericdpeerik3928
      @ericdpeerik3928 Год назад +3

      M'kay

  • @johnericpamintuan6718
    @johnericpamintuan6718 Год назад +5

    Perfect/ Ideal Missile system for the Philippines Arm Forces

  • @mr.martyr8573
    @mr.martyr8573 Год назад +25

    As someone that's spent the last 20 years in the defense industry, I think we cant get them there fast enough. We really need to up production.

    • @OliHandy2008
      @OliHandy2008 Год назад +3

      They are very expensive though, I think because of the rising cost of groceries and household energy, they should halt production and development of all destructive capabilities and have world peace for a few years, you know, until people are no longer struggling to feed their families and keep them warm. I think that would be nicer. Don't you agree? I've spent over 40 years NOT in the defence industry, so I know what i'm talking about!

    • @UnratedMadness
      @UnratedMadness Год назад

      @@OliHandy2008 Bidens America banned export of fentanyl to Russia last year, calling it "potential weapon". USA is number 2 in use while Russia 67th place. Biden will not benefit nether democracy nor the people of his country. Who is going to ban fentanyl imports to America? ATACMS will bring down inflation by giving people jobs and rescuing Ukraine from a dictators regime. If we do nothing, no innovation nor skillful jobs will exist. Who cares about inflation, if you work so much there is no time to spend the money?

    • @lordphullautosear
      @lordphullautosear Год назад +4

      ​@@OliHandy2008-- you'd only need about 30 days as a slave in the RF to understand why your dream isn't currently possible. Can't "koombayah" with the unevolved from Darwin's waiting room...and it's not "just their government"...

    • @LuvBorderCollies
      @LuvBorderCollies Год назад +1

      @@lordphullautosear I never gave human evolution much thought, but now I certainly believe it stopped in Russia over 10,000 years ago. They barely came out of the caves and they just froze up.

    • @gianniformica8235
      @gianniformica8235 Год назад +2

      ​@OliHandy2008
      Right...
      Because the United States stepping back from its security agreements and guarantees, the same ones that have allowed it to be the primary beneficiary of not only European, but global markets, and just allow those markets to devolve and fall apart in war, would mean "cheaper food" for Americans.
      It wouldn't cause an economic disaster in the United States or anything.
      I got an idea...
      How about the United States just steps back completely.
      I mean China has been trying to tell the Europe that it should be using its currency instead of the American dollar for global commerce for a long time.
      I'm sure the EU would just go right on supporting the American dollar just to be nice.
      It's not like being the currency of global exchange means much anyway.
      I'm sure it'll be very beneficial to the prices of household goods in the US.
      The United States is the greatest economy that has ever existed.
      But that's not a given.
      It requires a constant presence.
      Americans can't have one without the other.

  • @MrJdebest
    @MrJdebest Год назад +6

    "Only the dead have seen the end of war", Quote from ?

    • @masshysteria9657
      @masshysteria9657 Год назад +2

      George Santayana

    • @razony
      @razony Год назад +1

      Patton?

    • @liamo8932
      @liamo8932 Год назад +1

      Never interupt me when I am making a mistake ~ me

  • @first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456
    @first-thoughtgiver-of-will2456 Год назад +4

    It's really disappointing to hear Russia is invading their own comrades. I was really hoping as a young kid in the 90s that Russia would westernize and we'd have awesome global market, science and tech collaborations. I really like Russian culture and principles it's terrible how leadership corruption has plagued those people.

    • @OliHandy2008
      @OliHandy2008 Год назад

      So Western governments aren't corrupt, you say? Just the Russian leadership you say? Well I've never been so enlightened. I thought ALL the global elites were equally corrupt. But it's just the Russians eh? Hmmmm. Incredible insights you provide.

    • @ToeCutter0
      @ToeCutter0 Год назад

      @@OliHandy2008 Hmm, someone strike a nerve? I only ask as the OP never suggested corruption was unique to Russia? You seem to have made that up all on your own.
      The West has been aware of Putin’s nonsense over the past 30 yrs. No other country assassinates political opponents using nerve agents. No other country assassinate political opponents using Polonium. Only RUSSIA misbehaves this way. The reason the entire world has decided to end Putin’s military is due to all this past nonsense.
      What you seem to have missed is how the OP expresses their interest in Russia becoming a nation that can be welcomed by the rest of the world with trade and other positive relations. That said, Putin has pulled so much shit in Russia’s name and the world has grown tired of Putin’s tantrums. Putin fuked around and found out just how pathetic his armed forces have become after more 20+ yrs of HIS leadership. The pathetically poor condition of the Russian military is just one more example of the depth of corruption that Putin has allowed to flourish.
      Why is a convicted-criminal-turned-caterer (Prigozhin) running the invasion of Ukraine?! It’s laughable to to see an old convict dressed up in a military uniform recruiting other convicts to go to war for Russia. It’s also why Sergey Lavrov was literally *laughed* at in New Delhi when he suggested that the West started the war in Ukraine.
      When will the Russian people finally decide the future of Russia? Global trade has lifted so many out of poverty and Russia has some of the highest skilled workers in the world. Nations no longer conquer other countries for resources, they make goods and establish brands. Russia’s economy was smaller than that of Texas *before* Putin’s horribly misguided invasion of Ukraine. How many decades will it take to recover after Putin’s long gone?

    • @andrewforward3812
      @andrewforward3812 Год назад

      well, id you thinking the West is any better, you should invest further time in learning more about the glorius west........

  • @stevea2909
    @stevea2909 Год назад +6

    Imagine Slim Pickens riding one of these badboys! I know it's not an A- bomb but it's 2023 not 1964! YEEHAW!!!

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад +1

      I mean it can be an "A-bomb"

    • @pezpengy9308
      @pezpengy9308 Год назад +3

      points for what is now (but didnt used to be) an obscure reference.

    • @dutchsailor6620
      @dutchsailor6620 Год назад

      He was riding an H-bomb, not an A-bomb.

  • @truettgarner4505
    @truettgarner4505 4 месяца назад +1

    In 1991, a truck driver friend parked his rig on the farm I lived on. He was headed to Wilmington NC with a load of some of the first ATACMS.

  • @emerlabra1934
    @emerlabra1934 Год назад +3

    Those man-made island fortifications of the chinese ccp in the SCS would be a good target for this tactical weapon system 👍👍

  • @sushibar777
    @sushibar777 Год назад +6

    We need to get these to Ukraine asap. They should have been supplied early last year.

  • @WTH1812
    @WTH1812 Год назад +4

    ATACMS sits atop of the all-service 'MS line. Others are:
    JAVMS,
    BOMBMS,
    DRONEMS,
    HOWITZMS,
    MORTARMS,
    SHOOTMS,
    STABMS,
    STRIKEMS,
    - and -
    BingAI'MS

  • @Kingcarparpeggio
    @Kingcarparpeggio Год назад +2

    I like when he said “ it would be seen as escalatory” if Ukraine fired missiles deep into Russia …..no thought that Russia has invaded deep into Ukraine,committed countless war crimes and only recently Lavrov addressed an audience in India and claimed Ukraine had invaded Russia…..mind you most of the audience pissed theirselves laughing 😂😂😂

    • @Catharsys1
      @Catharsys1 Год назад

      The Indians laughing was legendary. Poor Lavrov didn't expect that 😂😂😂

  • @markmilan57
    @markmilan57 Год назад +4

    If it goes beyond 600 miles than it is jaw dropping!

  • @dannypierce9528
    @dannypierce9528 Год назад +1

    We should have been training them the entire time and helping them set up infrastructure since 2014 as hard we could

    • @VikingVic76
      @VikingVic76 Год назад

      We had trainers/advisors in Ukraine since 2016 maybe earlier. We still have ppl/ advisors there now.

  • @brikaf6001
    @brikaf6001 Год назад +6

    you guys make the absolutely best videos, thank you!

    • @Au60schild
      @Au60schild Год назад

      Yeah, too bad that their accuracy is less than a scud's.

  • @bigstyx
    @bigstyx Год назад

    Of course every Russian is going to say, is it hypersonic. Hyper sonic is like in a wheelchair. Are they kidding. We are way beyond hyper sonic.

  • @sabatheus
    @sabatheus Год назад +4

    Honest question: I thought cluster bombs were against the Geneva Convention, or some other treaty? I don't know if ATACMS is classified as this, but the footage clearly shows missiles breaking apart into sub-munitions before impact.

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ Год назад +10

      Its in a treaty but the US was one of the countries to not sign off on it, so we still have cluster munitions

    • @ToeCutter0
      @ToeCutter0 Год назад +5

      See Desert Storm & Op Iraqi Freedom where cluster munitions were regularly deployed by US.

    • @TheHk1966
      @TheHk1966 Год назад +4

      Ukraine isn’t a signatory to that pact🧐😇😏🥸

    • @rhensontollhouse
      @rhensontollhouse Год назад +4

      The big problem with older cluster munitions is the bomblets failed to explode leaving them lying in wait for civilians and friendly forces, making some areas deadly minefields for years to come. Newer munitions have resolved that issue. Russia regulary uses cluster munitions against Ukraine. The soon to be deployed GLSDB rocket motors used to carry old-fashioned cluster munitions. The cluster warneads were destroyed and are replaced with SDB, thus complying with the core issue of treaty.

    • @TheHk1966
      @TheHk1966 Год назад +3

      Why should Ukraine honour a deal that Russia itself doesn’t abide by??

  • @raimobrunning3657
    @raimobrunning3657 Год назад +2

    Ukraine needs long range weapons 🇺🇦🇺🇸✌️

  • @bryanmontgomery996
    @bryanmontgomery996 Год назад +4

    MK is pronounced "mark" in military designations.

  • @MrDavidwilson86
    @MrDavidwilson86 Год назад

    I picture a scientist baby talking his creation. Ooze a cute little atackumms 😂

  • @DerDrecksack87
    @DerDrecksack87 Год назад +2

    Didnt help Bakhmut much, just got taken if the videos are to be trusted and 50k ukrainians are cut off now in a pot...

  • @Tirani2
    @Tirani2 Год назад +1

    That's why the military has been handing out HIMRS systems and compatible missiles like candy to Ukraine. They know they're about to get new toys.

  • @chesspiece81
    @chesspiece81 Год назад +4

    Only in America would we have an extremely deadly missile with a 130 mile range named ATACMS pronounced Attack-ems.

    • @kiowablue2862
      @kiowablue2862 Год назад +1

      Not pronounced Attack-ems. The A is long. it's A-tac-ems.

  • @dirkaminimo4836
    @dirkaminimo4836 Год назад +1

    Ukraine is the perfect weapons testing theater, best ever since WW2! By the gods will you all give Ukraine the ability to win? Stop dragging this out!!

  • @La-familia-de-Fazio
    @La-familia-de-Fazio Год назад +18

    I originally learned about this devastating destructive power in the Eric Banna Hulk Movie where a similar type weapon was used except I think it was fired from an artillery in placement!
    It’s was the warhead being delivered that shotgun spread the artillery round out like God took a Shotgun from heaven and rained down death below!

    • @Rimasta1
      @Rimasta1 Год назад

      I think those were 155mm DPICM rounds. Would’ve been better to use a copperhead round on the Hulk. Cool scene.

  • @JUSTINOURSE
    @JUSTINOURSE Год назад +1

    Ukraine doesn't just attack them they ATACMS!

  • @DetroitMicroSound
    @DetroitMicroSound Год назад +7

    HIMARS is the stuff in RuZFed's nightmares, nightly. Still.

    • @carinhall4508
      @carinhall4508 Год назад +5

      Lancet drones are the stuff in HIMARS and M777 nightmares

    • @DetroitMicroSound
      @DetroitMicroSound Год назад +4

      @@carinhall4508 Which HIMARS crew has been taken out? Give me map coordinates, so I can verify your claim.. OH, STILL NOT A SINGLE TRUCK, THAT WASN'T A DECOY?

  • @vojtechpribyl7386
    @vojtechpribyl7386 11 месяцев назад

    Russians: *Gasp* They might shoot back at us?!? Inconcievablyat!

  • @Matlockization
    @Matlockization Год назад +3

    I like the block 1A MGM-140 tactical missile system with the high explosive submunitions.

  • @littleshopofelectrons4014
    @littleshopofelectrons4014 Год назад +1

    Aside from the use of nuclear weapons I don't think Russia has anything left to escalate with so why not supply ATACMS to Ukraine.

  • @matthewhuszarik4173
    @matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад +5

    I don’t think Ukraine is demanding anything of the US or the Western allies. A much more accurate term would be requesting from the US.

    • @atomicwedgie8176
      @atomicwedgie8176 Год назад +3

      Demanding weapons and $Billions in taxpayer money? Otay👌 -Joe

    • @matthewhuszarik4173
      @matthewhuszarik4173 Год назад

      @@atomicwedgie8176 Ukraine isn’t demanding anything they are requesting. A demand has an implied or overt threat.

  • @Air-bear
    @Air-bear Год назад

    Gadfly here 😯. That doesn’t mean Ukraine can’t use its own technology 😬

  • @overanDownUnder
    @overanDownUnder Год назад +21

    Give Ukraine the ATACMS. Russia has had no problem indiscriminately targeting civilians. It’s time for Russian military personnel, bases, critical military infrastructure to be able to be targeted at the furthest ranges.

    • @rodneytuxedo7559
      @rodneytuxedo7559 Год назад

      Both corrupt shitholes kill civilians. Turn off your tv. Youre being played.

    • @TheDrage123
      @TheDrage123 Год назад +4

      Agreed, the only thing I would forbid is ICBMS and tactical nuke arms. Anything else tho? Give it to them. A-10. Abrams. f-16, f-15, f-18, AWACS, ect. Ukraine needs to control the air

    • @menwithven8114
      @menwithven8114 Год назад +2

      ​@TheDrage123 what will "controlling the air" actually accomplish? It won't have any real word affect because Russia hasn't been using their Air Force at all. All it will accomplish is seeing video of an American made fighter jet inevitably being shot down and pissing everyone off and costing an enormous amount of money to Americans for training, fuel and hardware and maintenance.

    • @ryateo1
      @ryateo1 Год назад

      ​@@TheDrage123 no.
      No.
      No.
      It obvious now that Russia doesn't even KNOW how to fight. And if we didnt sanction them, they WOULD be broke.... But we dumb. Gave our two greatest adversaries a common enemy.

    • @ryateo1
      @ryateo1 Год назад

      ​@@TheDrage123 a side note......
      A10 is built for wars Two decades past....
      It actually would be perfect.....
      Except neither russia nor ukraine have air superiority out side of you tube videos🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.....
      Neither country could field A10s... Because video games are the only place their planes live up to the "specs"🤣🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁😁😁🤡🤡🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤣🤡🤡

  • @societyreborn33
    @societyreborn33 Год назад +2

    Poor Ukraine. Getting the tax $$ of millions of working class, insane amounts of high tech weapons, and still losing slowly on all fronts to the world's weakest and most overrated military: Russia. Something here doesn't add up

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ Год назад

      Its not a war meant to be “won”. Its just a money laundering proxy war

  • @mankihonda983
    @mankihonda983 Год назад +3

    Ultimate weapon attacking civilians behind enemy lines*

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад +1

      Ah yes.... never mind the 33-foot(11m) kh-22 hitting grocery stores and apartment buildings with Russia saying "the missiles have all hit their intended targets."

    • @mankihonda983
      @mankihonda983 Год назад

      @@nick4819 Ukrainean air defense has been revealed as the culprit for the missiles missing their intended targets every time. They make the call to risk civilians instead of their NATO weapon caches.

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад

      @@mankihonda983 An air defense missile looks nothing like a KH22. You can see the KH22 CLEARLY in videos. Ukraine does not have KH22's anymore as they don't have the aircraft to carry them. Only Russia. Your lies have been exposed time and time again. The only people to believe them are your own people.

  • @DjJ785
    @DjJ785 Год назад +1

    Wish all the leader fought each other instead of having kids go to war

  • @Neobert5240
    @Neobert5240 Год назад +3

    Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦

  • @donprincoify
    @donprincoify Год назад +1

    I say give whatever weapon system Ukraine needs to expel all the Russian invaders. Russia already crossed the red line when they invaded a sovereign state without provocations. They are in no place to dictate terms of how America and NATO helps the brave Ukrainians defend themselves.

  • @stevenhart9004
    @stevenhart9004 Год назад

    What a terrible shame to have to waste these beautiful looking missiles on Russians.

  • @georgepalmer5497
    @georgepalmer5497 Год назад +4

    Maybe they could design an ATACMS anti armor warhead that breaks up into guided sub munitions, and that would take out large numbers of tanks.

    • @georgeau2523
      @georgeau2523 Год назад +3

      Like 155mm Excalibur but less practical?

    • @georgepalmer5497
      @georgepalmer5497 Год назад +2

      No. They have a bomb in the GBU series that breaks up into guided submunitions. A single one of these bombs could take out like about forty tanks. The ATACMS series of guided missiles would lend itself to this kind of configuration. It could probably take out thirty or forty tanks by itself. It would be good for hitting staging areas and any other place where armor was congregating.

    • @jessehachey2732
      @jessehachey2732 Год назад

      @@georgepalmer5497 You play too many video games, this is real life 🙄🤦🏼‍♂️🇺🇦🌻

    • @georgepalmer5497
      @georgepalmer5497 Год назад

      They already have a bomb dropped from an airplane that breaks up into guided submunitions that can take out forty or more tanks. It shouldn't be too great a trick to make a similar bomb delivered by an ATACMS missile.

  • @EderReis
    @EderReis Год назад

    Ukraine didn't demand ATACMS, Ukraine asks for them.

  • @Theredmengroup
    @Theredmengroup Год назад +2

    I definitely watched this video as I wrote this comment

  • @kawythowy867
    @kawythowy867 Год назад +1

    Nice!! Love it. Turn this equipment loose on these fools.

  • @johnbethea4505
    @johnbethea4505 Год назад +4

    I thought that cluster bombs were outlawed???

    • @Nobodyfromnowhere42
      @Nobodyfromnowhere42 Год назад +3

      It was an agreement that both the US and Russia didnt follow , so its invalid basically

    • @dwaneanderson8039
      @dwaneanderson8039 Год назад +3

      The Convention on Cluster Munitions only applies to the countries that signed it. The United States, Russia, and China never signed it.

    • @charliechop4891
      @charliechop4891 Год назад

      i think the only nations to not sign into that were US and Russian. not sure tho.

    • @joshschneider9766
      @joshschneider9766 Год назад

      Charlie the above poster is correct, China never signed it either

  • @ramonpunsalang3397
    @ramonpunsalang3397 Год назад

    300Km? Storm Shadow reporting for duty.

  • @rider3859
    @rider3859 Год назад +9

    Good to see my tax dollars hard at work for anther corrupt war instead of being spent on my fellow countrymen who are suffering in record numbers.

    • @TheDrage123
      @TheDrage123 Год назад

      Is that what tucker carlson told you? I promise you friend, your qanon reps were never gone give you that money or any support. You are being pitted against your own by the mega rich

    • @joshschneider9766
      @joshschneider9766 Год назад +1

      We could do both. Very easily. Blame obstructionist Republicans for not taking care of you. Not suffering Ukrainians for defending themselves

    • @drtmi8789
      @drtmi8789 Год назад

      @@joshschneider9766 You're an idiot leftard. FOAD

    • @Summitclym
      @Summitclym Год назад +1

      It’s not an either/or matter.

    • @arkangel7782
      @arkangel7782 Год назад +1

      Good to see trash takes are still going strong on the internet

  • @timothywood4402
    @timothywood4402 Год назад +2

    It’s just amazing how many different items like these we have.It’s AWESOME.😊

    • @tapio83
      @tapio83 Год назад +1

      700B / year buys a lot of toys. I like the meme "* is about to find out why us doesn't have free healthcare"

    • @Au60schild
      @Au60schild Год назад

      @@tapio83 Wait, what does that meme mean?

    • @tapio83
      @tapio83 Год назад

      @@Au60schild Usually it's accompanied with picture of stealth bomber or something similar and It means some country messing with US is about to find out what shit ton of military budget buys and enables contry to do - and what us has as capability while they don't have free education or healtcare

    • @Au60schild
      @Au60schild Год назад

      You threw me by misspelling "United States" as "us", which in itself is a word, you know, a pronoun.

  • @Nathan666
    @Nathan666 Год назад +6

    So far, only one attack has been done with this missile, hitting Mariupol and having no reported damage.
    The issue is that Russian ADA has been very effective at destroying most of the MLRS salvos of 12+ missiles that 1 or 2 make it thru, so now with a single missile or a pair, it is unlikepy they are gonna make it to the target, not to mention the longer flight times means longer tracking times and more time to engage as many times as needed to destroy it. Just as the reported 10 "secret projectiles" fired on Mariupol most likely were all shot down and the reported explosions were them being destroyed since no damage was reported, and that was 8days ago.

    • @kevinshort3943
      @kevinshort3943 Год назад +7

      That was GLSDB, NOT ATACMS.
      GLSDB is a Swedish/US bomb with wings and a cheap (relatively) rocket motor.

    • @nimbusnimbus.IV.
      @nimbusnimbus.IV. Год назад

      Nathan must be a supporter of the eViL hItLeR pUtInS. The az0v n@zis will get these missles and win the war!

  • @mybirds2525
    @mybirds2525 Год назад +1

    ATACMS is fired from Fort Sill OK. The target is White Sands Missile Range. That range is 599 miles. With the strategic arms treaties gone trash by Russia they will probably make it far higher performance.

  • @nick4819
    @nick4819 Год назад +3

    38 Russkies mad already.
    EDIT: Gaining some momentum. 82 Russkies so far. Dark Tech, I had no idea you had so many Russian viewers lol they better be enjoying these videos. Won't be long now until papa putin disconnects their internet from the world. I see a law that just was changed/passed that says now they can't use a social platform owned by a foreign country. What a great, free, prosperous nation.
    🙄

    • @JC89.
      @JC89. Год назад +1

      🤣 they are crying in the comments

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад

      @@JC89. They are fucking insane. They love it when their state TV talks about killing all of the West and murdering women and children....yet they lose their shit when a youtuber makes a video about a weapon that was specifically designed for fighting Russkies.

  • @machdaddy6451
    @machdaddy6451 Год назад +1

    ATACMS would enable Ukraine to take back Crimea.

  • @rougecampos317
    @rougecampos317 Год назад +2

    Yet Ukraine is losing..

  • @tankandspank
    @tankandspank Год назад

    Looks like Stormshadow has taken that role...

  • @novorossian2279
    @novorossian2279 Год назад +10

    Russia will defeat all attempts at destroying it. She is an anvil that will wear out all hammers. Unsubscribed!

    • @JC89.
      @JC89. Год назад

      Bye Orc 🤡 may you burn in hell

    • @mingming9604
      @mingming9604 Год назад +5

      you are already being destroyed!!

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад +1

      You are a busted anvil who won't stop invading its neighbors in hope of reviving an empire that has constantly collapsed the last few centuries. Of all the problems your nation faces, your least concern should be taking territory. The amount of land and resources available to you, you should be THE world power....have you not ever wondered why you have failed time and time again?

    • @everydayhero5076
      @everydayhero5076 Год назад

      To unsubscribe from a channel because they said something you didn't agree or because your feelings got hurt with is a closed-minded way of thinking. He didn't say anything bad about Russia. Nobody wants to "destroy Russia" not even Ukraine, they just want their land back and Russia out. No one gave two shits about Russia before their "special military operation" invasion of Ukraine. It's Putin no one likes now, not the Russian people, he's the one who brought war, death, famine, and destruction. GTFO of Ukraine or overthrow Putin and all could be well again in 10 years or so but that won't happen now will it.

    • @mrmunchkin2181
      @mrmunchkin2181 Год назад +4

      Who is actively invading Russia with ground forces and tanks?

  • @Colonel1233
    @Colonel1233 Год назад

    no matter what, ukraine needs those !!!

  • @gotohellfast
    @gotohellfast Год назад +9

    "Smashing Russia"? I subscribed for neutral info not for indoctrination. Unsubbed.

    • @JC89.
      @JC89. Год назад

      Bye orc 🤡 nobody wants you here anyway

    • @mingming9604
      @mingming9604 Год назад

      good riddance! go back to your rusky hideout!

    • @elijah_9392
      @elijah_9392 Год назад +4

      To be fair, S400s are not intercepting these rockets and they are effectivly disabling Russian supply lines.
      Ammo depots keep getting moved back, tank columns are being blown up, and generals are being killed. All thanks to these rockets.

    • @nick4819
      @nick4819 Год назад

      Bye Russki. ATACMS isn't smashing you....yet....but its baby brothers are. It isn't "indoctrination." Many western weapons were specifically designed for smashing the USSR/Russia. Sure, they are used for other places. But since you have always wanted to destroy the West, many of its weapon systems were specifically designed and built to destroy your military capabilities. You should be thankful. Ours aren't programmed for civilian houses. Seems yours are though.

    • @mrmunchkin2181
      @mrmunchkin2181 Год назад +3

      @@elijah_9392 Yeah, this does constitute as Russia getting smashed at least in terms of logistics.

  • @matthewbrunner5908
    @matthewbrunner5908 Год назад +3

    So it’s basically a cluster bomb from the video. Aren’t those internationally outlawed? I know Russia used them in Ukraine but we can’t give out goods that are not legal to use. If I’m wrong correct me.

    • @kiowablue2862
      @kiowablue2862 Год назад +2

      Cluster munitions is but one payload ATACMS uses. There are others.

    • @jamesjellis
      @jamesjellis Год назад

      The US is decommissioning their cluster munitions bombs that launch small explosive bomblets due to the risk of unexploded ordinance. However they are still using bombs and missiles that launch solid tungsten metal balls.

    • @galatians-2.20
      @galatians-2.20 Год назад +4

      I could be wrong but I believe both the US and Russia never agreed to not use cluster munitions nor did they sign the pact.

    • @ToeCutter0
      @ToeCutter0 Год назад +3

      @@galatians-2.20 This is the correct response. Cluster munitions were used extensively by US in Iraq, both ‘91 and ‘03.

  • @kasimjabari
    @kasimjabari Год назад +2

    From all the destruction inflicted on Ukraine's armed forces, one wonders; how come none of these Smashing US wonder weapons didn't help Ukraine to at least slow down the Russians. The idea of stopping Russia is a fantasy, let's just slow them down.
    No "ATACMS" which is a fancy name for an imitated Russian Katyusha which has been around since early 1940s, and no other fancy US made weapon could make a dent in Ukraine. Daydreaming does help though but not in the battle field since Russia has over a dozen of more destructive types of multiple rocket launchers most of which have bigger warheads, longer range and better precision.
    In Artillery and rockets Russia dwarfs US and the world in both quality and quantity.

  • @GoldsmithsStats
    @GoldsmithsStats Год назад +5

    I would guess this is being kept in reserve against the time - if it ever comes - when Russia either crosses an American red line e.g. , tactical nukes, or seems to be breaking through to capture Kiev.

    • @Oregon123
      @Oregon123 Год назад

      Russia already gave the nuclear warning if America crosses its red line. What else are nukes good for besides detering demons like the biden administration. The usa is not lord of the world. It cannot be allowed to rape countries year after year. Decade after decade. Really the world needs to turn its back on the west.

    • @Bob-qk2zg
      @Bob-qk2zg Год назад +1

      It goes back to the Cold War when we were expecting to fight in Germany

    • @AmricanEagl
      @AmricanEagl Год назад +1

      Capture Kiev?! They have been trying to capture Bakhmut (a small city in the east) for the past 8 months with thousands upon thousands of dead soldiers! How are they gonna capture Kiev?! With their T72 tanks 😂😂

    • @Oregon123
      @Oregon123 Год назад

      @@AmricanEagl257,000 ukranian dead NAZI, 85,000 escaped from the military, 157,000 wounded. Zelinsky keeps throwing ukraines youth into the meatgrinder in Bahmut. To the last ukranian as Biden and Zelinsky say. Soon it will be to the last nato NAZI because either the last ukranians escaped ukraine or they are dead. The west wants ukraine so bad it can taste it. Their peoples toes are curling.

    • @AmricanEagl
      @AmricanEagl Год назад

      @@Oregon123 cope and seethe harder commie, the end of putinstan in near

  • @tryscience
    @tryscience Год назад

    Since when does Russia dictate our foreign policy?

  • @effingsix3825
    @effingsix3825 Год назад +3

    Why wouldn’t ATACAMS be used, since Kaliber cruise missiles have been launched from within Russia at Ukrainian civilian targets with a longer range? Why not just hand over Tomahawk cruise missiles? Russia has engaged in every type of provocation and escalation, so Ukraine should be legitimately targeting the Kremlin.

    • @reaperinc7752
      @reaperinc7752 Год назад

      Putin would have a hisy fit if Ukraine targeted the Kremlin.

    • @effingsix3825
      @effingsix3825 Год назад

      There’s another missile strike on a civilian target in Ukraine, why would the west or more especially Europe care about what hysteria it causes in the Kremlin if they get their own medicine?

    • @effingsix3825
      @effingsix3825 Год назад

      If things escalate out of hand into a global conflict, that would mean a nuclear exchange. We’re not there yet. It’s all a question of what, exactly the Russians want. They want to stand in the way of Europe emerging as a superpower and being subsumed by it. They have already hastened the emergence of an expansion of NATO and the awakening of European defence contractors getting involved in the mix.

  • @thedeathwobblechannel6539
    @thedeathwobblechannel6539 Год назад

    Lance: can we bring the brewskis?
    Putin: yes, yes bring the brewskis

  • @mabotiyn
    @mabotiyn Год назад +2

    The Russians needs to test the results of American ingenuity. Give this to Ukraine

    • @drtmi8789
      @drtmi8789 Год назад

      NAZI supporter.

    • @mabotiyn
      @mabotiyn Год назад

      @@drtmi8789 🤔🤔🤔. You confused af! Look at what Putin is doing and saying and look at what Hitler did and said

    • @drtmi8789
      @drtmi8789 Год назад

      @@mabotiyn I'm not confused at all. I know exactly what's going on over there. You're the sheep who believes everything the liberal media tells you.

    • @John_Redcorn_
      @John_Redcorn_ Год назад +1

      @@mabotiyn maybe so, but since you mentioned hitler its kind of ironic that one side has literal nazi factions in their ranks. Idk who can honestly support this “war” from any angle

  • @samsneedwatchaneed2715
    @samsneedwatchaneed2715 Год назад

    Yup, I just bought two bags of the cheese snack ems and one bag of the cinnamon fire attack ems for the party tonite

  • @tomc5803
    @tomc5803 Год назад

    Ukraine has been begging for these for months, but our cowardly leaders won't let them have them. We keep seeing the ruthless attacks on civillians in Ukraine but our leaders don't want Ukraine to be able to strike into Russia. This make no sense at all. We need to supply them with the biggest missiles we have so they can inflict the same damage on Russia that they have been inflicting on Ukraines cities and towns and it's civillians!!! Anything else is just an example of our cowardess.

  • @kennypowerz1267
    @kennypowerz1267 Год назад

    So if they constantly upgrade the block 1? What do they do with the missiles before the upgrade? What do they do with the old ones ?

    • @Au60schild
      @Au60schild Год назад

      Give 'em to Israel, of course.

  • @dna129
    @dna129 Год назад

    If you have the closed captions on, the captions continuously call them "attackums". Mmmm, Attackums, the forbidden snack. "Destroy your enemies, destroy your hunger."

  • @w3vjp568
    @w3vjp568 Год назад

    “Try the new jalapeño flavored Attack’Ums! Bet you can’t eat just one!”

  • @bobdadnaila7708
    @bobdadnaila7708 Год назад

    The REAL Scoville challenge...

  • @josephdestaubin7426
    @josephdestaubin7426 Год назад

    First of all, Ukrainians doesn't make demands, they make requests. Secondly, Russia said that about everything.

  • @KDFRxpo2
    @KDFRxpo2 Год назад +2

    Interesting as always!

  • @ronaldmarcks1842
    @ronaldmarcks1842 Год назад +2

    Russia and its crazy "red lines". Since when does the bank robber get to draw red lines against police activity?

  • @newtagwhodis4535
    @newtagwhodis4535 Год назад

    On Ukraine: only a negotiated settlement will end incursions and further land disputes. I say for the security of all NATO allies, the US puts conditions on its provided resources. War is never good. Best avoided and negotiated. Power trades hands but wanton imperialism after the dawn of nuclear proliferation is truly a stranglehold on word peace and should be confronted. I’m torn. Luckily not war torn. Best to all the vets that might see this, you all secure our rights and ideals in the states. Thank you for your service. Peace to Europe is my hope.

  • @vonMohl
    @vonMohl Год назад

    There would be no hunger in the world if all the money used for weapons was used for fighting famine.

  • @kevinv7178
    @kevinv7178 Год назад +1

    Sure, send them all to Ukraine. It's not like we'll ever need them. eye roll*

  • @LXIX_
    @LXIX_ Год назад +2

    Nice.

  • @regularguy8592
    @regularguy8592 Год назад +1

    they need to get the got dam things over to Ukraine asap

  • @hanrockabrand95
    @hanrockabrand95 Год назад +2

    Block 1, eh? Yeah, sure, the MGM-140 through -168 are great, but I'm holding out for the MGM-1000 (aka MGM-Grand). 🦁

  • @gregchambers6100
    @gregchambers6100 Год назад

    So Russia can attack deep inside Ukraine but Ukraine can't attack deep inside Russia. "You can't negotiate with someone who says what's mine is mine and what's yours is negotiable." John F Kennedy.